PZC Packet 050493rvxM...
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
May 4, 1993
Page 1
Lot 45, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Falcon Point Condominiums
Color Change Request
Ufflotoiliff4w e,
Steve Lyden, manager of Falcon Point Condominiums is requesting
Final Design Review approval for a change to the existing exterior
colors of that project.
The specific request is to repaint the green trim in burgundy, the
beige siding will be changed to a "blue spruce", the off white
stucco will be repainted "Navaho white". Color samples will be
presented at the hearing.
STAFF COMMENTS
As this is a color change request, staff has no comments.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff does not have a recommendation on this request.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
1. Introduce Application
2. Applicant Presentation
3. Commission Review
4. Commission Action
(Respectfully submitted,
V
Tom Allender
Planner
Approved as submitted (X) Approved with recommended
conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( )�
Continued ( Denied ( ) w� n ( )
Date Patti Dixon, Secretary `
Approved color- are "Rltip Snrura" fnr tha trim that is rurrontlu green
"Navaho Whita" fnr tha ctnrrn and a natural wourl rs rd r rnlnr for tho
wood siding.
. w _ E A N N p t A T I p R
P A R C E L /—.,A
1 �
I
I
t OP
•s 1 ^•cr . WHITE RI
NA T 1 0 N A L
PLD IY y1
OLD
tea' a\
mr�
+.•v. �, S"', B E N C H M A RI
. BEA VER CR AT
EEK
GLl- D
lJ j•1 ' �� CLDRc
1
E]RJ1 *
1 p � (U _
utdo _
WH
I T E R 1 V
N A T I O N A L FSUNROAr
I
SUB01\1 O yr \ ,
SGN f \
f
SWIFT GULCH
�e.yr
l c r 1 aesli I°°a cao°s •^•m [
° I rc
CE AT AVON0 „
� � f
q � wrr t Y
\ m n
� f el.cr • bM1 e
q •.Or. s,.np. � ` .nfEr
V[PIL .. VNb
T
awrpl
n.c,.
\ f
\ \
•= TR. 5 � ♦ � w. L 9RT �J �
NC TTINLNAM of —
\ BEAVER CPEE« I STA TIpN f9
f9�\
\ SUBDI VISUN ' I - qo
.4. ,ON
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
May 4, 1993
Page 1
Lot 71, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision
Steve and Laurie Thompson
Variance from Front Yard Setback
Public Hearing
ffRQ;L*J9J8_LV•,
Sam Sterling, of Sterling Homes Inc., representing Steve and Laurie
Thompson, is requesting a variance from the required front yard
setback for Lot 71, Block 1, Wildridge. The specific request is
for 10 feet of relief from the required 25 foot front setback. The
applicant believes that a variance would allow them to construct a
driveway with a reasonable grade, avoids a bridge type drive and
substantially reduces required site grading.
Lot 71, Block 1, slopes down steeply to the south of Saddlerid7e
Loop. In the areas of the required 25 foot setback the slope is in
excess of 45%.
STAFF COMMENTS:
APPROVAL CRITERIA: Before acting on a variance request, the
Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider the following
factors.
a. The relationship of the requested variance to
existing and potential uses and structures in the vicinity.
COMMENT: The applicant is proposing a single-family
structure for this residential lot, which is zoned PUD with a
duplex designation. The structure on the adjacent lot received a
variance from the required front setback, and is within 15 feet of
the road.
b. The degree to which relief from the strict or
literal interpretation and enforcement of a specified regulation is
necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment
among sites in the vicinity.
COMMENTS: The structure on Lot 70, Block 1,
Wildridge, immediately to the east of Lot 71, was granted a
variance by this Commission in February of 1990 because of the
steep terrain. Staff feels that approving the variance before us
would of constitute a granting of special privilege, and that the
steep topography is a real and legitimate physical hardship. A
variance for Lot 71 is necessary to achieve compatibility and
uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity.
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND VING COMMISSION
May 4, 1993
Page 2
ab
Lot 71, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision
Steve and Laurie Thompson
Variance from Front Yard Setback
Public Hearing
C. The effect of the requested variance on light and
air, distribution of population, transportation and traffic
facilities, public facilities and utilities, an public safety.
COMMENTS: The requested variance would have little
effect on the above conditions or facilities
FINDINGS REQUIRED: The Planning and Zoning Commission shall
make the following findings before granting a variance:
A. That the granting of the variance will not
constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the
limitations on other properties in the vicinity.
B. That the granting of the variance will not be
detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially
injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
C. That the variance is warranted for one or more of
the following reasons:
i. The strict or literal
interpretation and enforcement of the regulation would result in
practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent
with the objectives of this title;
ii. There are exceptional or
extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the site of
the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the
vicinity;
iii. The strict or literal
interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would
deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other
properties in the vicinity.
Staff recommendation is for approval based on the steepness of the
lot. Staff feels all the above required findings can be made
concerning this variance request.
,cl
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
May t, 1993
Page'3
iL6t 71, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision
Steve and Laurie Thompson
Variance from Front Yard Setback
Public: Hearing
RECOMMENDED
ACTION
1.
Introduce
Application
2.
Applicant
Presentation
3.
Commission
Review
4.
Commission
Action
Respectfully submitted,
Tom Allender
Planner
..1 9) J 4 . to) .
Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended
conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( )
X
Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( )
Date Patti Dixon, Secretary
setback.1()' parking
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
May 4, 1993
Lot 71, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision
Steve and Laurie Thompson
Single-family Residence
Conceptual Design Review
INTRODUCTION
Sam Sterling, architect, is representing the Thompson's who are
requesting a Conceptual Design Review for a proposed single-family
residence on Lot 71, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision. This project
is concurrently requesting a variance from the required front yard
setback. This lot is located on the south side of Saddleridge Loop
and is approximately 1.01. acres in size. The lot slopes down to
the south in some areas in excess of 40 percent. The zoning is PUD
with a duplex designation.
The structure is two stories high with approximately 2000 square
feet of habitable space, not including the attached garage. The
structure, as proposed, is within all Town height, lot coverage and
setback restrictions.
The exterior is of the lower level is finished in stucco, the color
is "French Vanilla", the upper level is 1X8 channel rustic in a
cedar tone finish. Windows will be wood clad with a bronze finish,
no trim will be used. Fascia will be 2 X 10 rough sawn cedar with
a Cedar Tone stain; soffits will be 3/8 fir plywood. The roof form
is an offset gable, it will be finished with Heritage II Asphalt
Composition shingle in d Shadow Gray.
The landscape plan leavers the majority of the lot
planted appears adequate. There are some real
grading plan. It plan is not really complete, an
appears to run at 10 percent, I question whether
build it as shown without placing fill material
lot. A retaining wall may be necessary on the
drive along it's entire length. Irrigation and
have not been discussed.
STAFF COMMENTS
Since this is a Conceptual Design Review,
recommendation will be provided.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Introduce Application
2. Applicant Presentation
3. Commission Review/Discussion
Respectfully submitted
Tom Allender
Planner
natural , what is
concerns with the
d while the drive
it is possible to
on the adjacent
north side of the
exterior lighting
no formal staff
TJ
BLOCK 4
SHEET 3 OF 6
2 ,
2
TE RIDGE
}4 56 S9 BS 64 B3,-.
39 82
4
!] Sr 58 )t 72
9 13
36 32 Si o9 Bo )O ,
37 38 52 51 SO 46 J TERRE' UNE
36 39 61 69 6B
R•
20 47 62 67
66
7
3 • 6 y 46 6J 6]
69 2 1�, '. 64
19 9 45
B 1 16
4
LITTLE \ 44 n3
nINT 15 TO 42 42
�e
e
2 4 0 0 41 —l/
J' 3S 51
3i 4p BLOCK
36 39 4645 4 SHEET 6 OF 6
32
33 4 3
33 34 S6 47 aC
52 48
90
7 79 ss
9. •09
24 'B 51 53 .
34 92
93
:n
24 21 49 87 1
2 4 94 e] 107 n
25 26 95
_ 106 IO
JUNE CREEM6J 8 9) 105 9 Qo
TRAIL
'4 BO 'Al TRACT R
75 i 6
a2 r. n 100
8 102 4 w
T 13 SI 52 SJ ! e
01
3 TE .2 50SI o S
• Jz ss i _ 3 6
S 34 1J ]6
` BLOCK 2e e •
/ SHEET 4 OF 6 Sr T TR4•T!!
41 36 2f 19 I
g 20
69�45 J9 2 20 165 ' TlIIC1
65 66 0
67 44 40 26 1 \\
50 43 41 25 22 r tr II
3 42 24 23
.1. TAIACTY 1
'1 `
_SE - 2
BLOCK I
SHEET 5 OF 6
41
49
49
24
Sr
27
4
6
23
28
4 -
29
2
4344
33
30
42
TN
31
!4 32
0
TJ
BLOCK 4
SHEET 3 OF 6
2 ,
2
TE RIDGE
}4 56 S9 BS 64 B3,-.
39 82
4
!] Sr 58 )t 72
9 13
36 32 Si o9 Bo )O ,
37 38 52 51 SO 46 J TERRE' UNE
36 39 61 69 6B
R•
20 47 62 67
66
7
3 • 6 y 46 6J 6]
69 2 1�, '. 64
19 9 45
B 1 16
4
LITTLE \ 44 n3
nINT 15 TO 42 42
�e
e
2 4 0 0 41 —l/
J' 3S 51
3i 4p BLOCK
36 39 4645 4 SHEET 6 OF 6
32
33 4 3
33 34 S6 47 aC
52 48
90
7 79 ss
9. •09
24 'B 51 53 .
34 92
93
:n
24 21 49 87 1
2 4 94 e] 107 n
25 26 95
_ 106 IO
JUNE CREEM6J 8 9) 105 9 Qo
TRAIL
'4 BO 'Al TRACT R
75 i 6
a2 r. n 100
8 102 4 w
T 13 SI 52 SJ ! e
01
3 TE .2 50SI o S
• Jz ss i _ 3 6
S 34 1J ]6
` BLOCK 2e e •
/ SHEET 4 OF 6 Sr T TR4•T!!
41 36 2f 19 I
g 20
69�45 J9 2 20 165 ' TlIIC1
65 66 0
67 44 40 26 1 \\
50 43 41 25 22 r tr II
3 42 24 23
.1. TAIACTY 1
'1 `
_SE - 2
BLOCK I
SHEET 5 OF 6
41
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
May 4, 1993
Page 1
Lot 45, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Anointed Christian Fellowship Church
Final Design Review
Erwin Bachrach, representing the Anointed Christian Fellowship
Church is requesting final design review for a proposed church
and parsonage on Lot 45, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Subdivision. The lot is a one-half acre in size and is zoned
Residential Low Density; it is located on the north side of
Nottingham Road. The lot is bordered by Town of Avon owned open
space tracts on the east and north sides, and by the A -Y
Townhomes on the west side.
In May of 1992, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved a
Special Review Use for a church and parsonage to be located on
this lot. The conditions of that approval were as follows:
1. The property be linited to uses typically
associated with church activities ( i.e. weekend services,
Sunday school, weddings).Any expansion of use beyond that
discussed at the meeting (i.e. provisions of community day care,
rental of fellowship hall to other groups and organizations,
etc.) must be brought back to the Commission for further review.
2. No external noise making devices will be allowed
(bells, speakers, etc.) and internal noise volume should be kept
to a level compatible with surrounding properties.
The proposed development consists of an approximate 5235 square
foot church and a 4600 square foot parsonage. The church is a
two level structure with a fellowship hall, three classrooms, and
a kitchen on the lower level and a 1450 square foot sanctuary,
two counseling rooms, nursery, and a pastor's office on the upper
level.
The parsonage consists of a three story, five bedroom, three and
one-half bath dwelling unit with an oversized two car garage.
The church building utilizes a combination of grey stucco and
vertical T&G cedar siding, also in gray. Fascia will be 2 X 12
cedar, soffits will be wafer board, both with a blue gray finish.
The roof form is an offset gable with a central dormer. The
proposed roof material has been changed from metal to medium
cedar shakes.
The parsonage uses the same exterior finishes as the church. It
also has a gable roof form and has two dormers on the street
elevation. The dormers on both the parsonage and the church will
be stucco.
w�'
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
May 4, 1993
Page 2
Lot 45, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Anointed Christian Fellowship Church
Final Design Review
The landscape plan includes a substantial buffer between the
townhomes to the west of the project and the parsonage. As per
the request of this Commission the sizes of the plant material in
this buffer have been increased. An automatic irrigation system
is proposed.
At the conceptual review of this project this Commission was
concerned about the color of the proposed metal roof, some
members were concerned with the material itself, the finish
treatment of the two dormers on the parsonage was an issue, and
the size of the landscaping on the west side was discussed. The
applicant has responded to all these concerns.
STAFF COMMENTS
the Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing
the design of the proposed project:
6.11 - The conformance with the Zoning Code and other
applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon.
COMMENT: This proposal appears to be in conformance with
the Zoning Code and all other Town of Avon rules and regulations.
6.12 - The suitability of the improvement, including type
and quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the
site upon which it is to be located.
COMMENT: These improvements, as proposed and with the
conditions imposed during the Special Review Use hearing, are
appropriate to the site.
6.13 - The compatibility of the design to minimize site
impacts to adjacent properties.
COMMENT: With the substantial landscape buffer that is
proposed, the residential feel of the design and the limitations
imposed a- part of the Special Review Use approval this project
should have no adverse site impacts on adjacent properties.
6.14 - The compatibility of the proposed improvement with
site topography.
COMMENT: Keeping in mind that the rear of this lot is
very steep, this design is reasonably compatible with the site
topography.
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
May 4, 1993
Page 3
Lot 45, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Anointed Christian Fellowship Church
Final Design review
6.15 - The visual appearance of any proposed improvements
as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public
ways.
COMMENTS: The proposed improvements have been designed
to have a residential feel, because of this it should be visually
compatible with the neighborhood.
6.16 - The objective that no improvement be so similar or
dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or
aesthetic will be impaired.
COMMENTS: Staff sees no conflict with this criteria.
6.17 - The general conformance of the proposed
improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of the
Town of Avon.
COMMENTS: This proposal is in general conformance with the
adopted goals, policies and programs of the Town of Avon.
Staff feels that the site planning, landscaping, and parking are
all ripPropriate, and that with the changes to the building, staff
can recommend approval .
RECONKENDED ACTION
1. Introduce Application
2. Applicant Presentation
3. Commission Review
4. Commission Action
Rospectfully submitted,
Tom Allender
Planner
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
0 May 4, 1993
Page 4
Lot 45, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
0 Anointed Christian Fellowship Church
Final Design Review
r
PLANNNING AND ZONING ACTION
Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended
conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions (X)
Continued ( ) Denied ( )
Date Patti Dixon, Secretary
Applicant must present revised colors to PU
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
May 4, 1993
Page 1
Lot 16, Filing 1, Eaglebend Subdivision
Mr. Tony Seibert
Design and Construction Services
Final Design Review
Lot 16, Filing 1, Eaglebend is a 16,000 square foot duplex lot that
slopes south toward the Eagle River. Design and Construction
Services is proposing 2 detached dwelling units connected by a
breezeway.
The structures have a total of approximately 5,860 square feet of
habitable space, which does not includes the attached garages.
Both units utilize finished walkout basements. Includinq the
walkouts, the buildings are three stories.
The structures will be finished with vertical board and batten
siding in a blue grey color. Roof will be standing seam metal in a
dark gray. Window and door trim will be 1X4 cedar, finished in a
blue gray, the clad windows will be white. The soffit and fascia
will be blue grey. The roof forms are 9/12 gables.
The landscape plan appears to be adequate, and includes an
automatic irrigation system. Site lighting is provided by wall
lights at each side of the garage doors and at all exterior eyits.
The project, as designed, meets all setbacks, and has adequate snow
storage and parking.
"WAVaRkS10
The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the
design of the proposed project:
6.11 - The conformance with the Zoning Code and other
applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon.
COMMENT: This proposal does not appear to be in
conformance with the Zoning Code, it is very questionable if the
two detached structures meet the Town's definition of a duplex.
That definition includes " ..a detached building containing two
dwelling units..." Staff believes this proposal does not fit the
definition. The Planning Commission granted final design •.eview
approval for detached duplex structures on this lot on FebruE.ry 22,
1989, this approval expired in February of 1991. A building permit
was applied for in June of 1991, but was never picked up. The
-y
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
May 4, 1993
Page 2
Lot 16, Filing 1, Eaglebend Subdivision
Mr. Tony Seibert
Design and Construction Services
Final Design Review
staff report for that approval stated that the project complied
with all zoning regulations, current staff believes that
determination was in error. In 1989 the Avon zoning code specified
a minimum common party wall of 20%. The applicant has addressed
this issue in an attached letter. Otherwise, the project is within
all Town rules and regulations.
6.12 - The suitability of the improvement, including type
and quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the
site upon which it is to be located.
COMMENT: Other than the zoning issues, these improvements,
as pro, -)sed, are appropriate to the neighborhood.
6.13 - The compatibility of the design to minimize site
impacts to adjacent properties.
COMMENT: The project's design preserves views to the Eagle
River from ad)acent property and does not appear to have any
adverse site impacts on adjacent properties.
6.14 - The compatibility of the proposed improvement with
site topography.
COMMENT: As submitted, the project is compatible with the
site topography.
6.15 - The visual appearance of any proposed improvements
as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways.
COMMENTS: The proposed improvements appear to be visually
compatible with the neighborhood.
6.16 - The objective that no improvement be so similar or
dissimilar to others in the vicinitN.- that values, monetary or
aesthetic will be impaired.
COMMENTS: Staff sees no conflict with this criteria.
6.17 - The general conformance of the proposed improvements
with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of the Town of Avon.
COMMENTS: Other than the zoning issues, this proposal is
in general conformance with the adopted goals, policies and
programs of the Town of Avon.
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
May 4, 1993
Page 3
Lot 16, Filing 1, Eaglebend Subdivision
Mr. Tony Seibert
Design and Construction Services
ad Final Design Review
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommendation is for denial due to the detached nature of
the two dwelling units.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
1. Introduce Application
2. Applicant Presentation
3. Commission Review
4. Commission Action
Respectfully submitted,
Tom Allender
Planner
PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION
Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended
conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( )
Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( 1
Date Patti Dixon, Secretary
The vote on the motion to approve was tied, therefore the motion eras
dpn i pd
a
Q --
P
- P
I Q ey c,
r -
/ / V
/ � I
2 W�
O
/ 2
/ O G
I
_Q
� f
1
0
.o
T a
to
3i
I
a �
I
_Q
� f
1
0
.o
T a
to
3i
I
a.�
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
May 4, 1993
Lot 6, Filing 1, Eaglebend Subdivision
Ken Harkias for James Robinson
Single Family Residence
Final Design Review
INTRODUCTION
Ken Harkias of Trends West, on behalf of James Robinson has requested
a Final Design Review for a proposed single family residence on Lot
6, Filing 1, Eaglebend Subdivision.
This lot is located between Eaglebend Drive and the Eagle River,
toward the east end of the Eaglebend Subdivision. The lot is .37
acres in size and slopes toward the Eagle River. The zoning is PUD
with a duplex designation.
The proposed structure is a two story log home, with approximately
4000 square feet of habitable space, not including the attached 550
square foot garage. The roof form is a series of gables with a shed
roof over the front porch, medium cedar shakes will be utilized. The
structure, as proposed, complies with all Town zoning regulations.
The exterior is to be constructed of full diameter logs with a
natural wood tone stain. A stone veneer is to be utilized on the
chimneys and to cover the foundation. Fascia will be 2X cedar,
painted green, soffits 1X6 spruce tongue and groove left natural.
Windows are clad casements, grids will be brown wood tone, window
trim will be 1X4 cedar, painted green. The rear door is a french
clad patio door, the front door is wood, trimmed in cedar. The
applicant will present color samples at the hearing.
The landscape plan is adequate and meets the approved design
guidelines of the Town. Site lighting and irrigation have not been
addressed.
P 1*41 • Ya
The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the
design of the proposed project:
6.11 - The conformance with the Zoning Code and other
applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon.
COMMENT: This proposal appears to be in conformance with the
Zoning Code and all other town of Avon rules and regulations.
6.12 - The suitability of the improvement, including type and
quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the site
upon which it is to be located.
COMMENT: These improvements, as proposed, are ap—jpriate to
the neighborhood, the materials to be used are of a high quality.
6.13 - The compatibility of the design to minimize site
impacts to adjacent properties.
•
.o
w0 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
May 4, 1993
Lot 6, Filing 1, Subdivision
Ken Harkias for Jamesames RobinsonRobi
Single Family Residence
Final Design Review
COMMENT: The project's design preserves views to the Eagle
River from adjacent property and does not appear to have any adverse
site impacts on adjacent properties.
6.14 - The compatibility of the proposed improvement with
site topography.
COMMENT: As submitted, the project is compatible with the
site topography.
6.15 - The visual appearance of any proposed improvements as
viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways,
COMMENTS: This Commission has approved other log homes in
this subdivision. The proposed improvements appear to be visually
compatible with the neighborhood.
6.16 - The objective that no improvement be so similar or
dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or
aesthetic will be impaired.
COMMENTS: Staff sees no conflict with this criteria.
6.17 - The general conformance of the proposed improvements
with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of the Town of Avon.
COMMENTS: This proposal is in general conformance with the
adopted goals, policies and programs of the Town of Avon.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Approval with the recommendation that a automatic irrigation system
be installed.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
1. Introduce Application
2. Applicant Presentation
3. Commission Review
4. Commission Action
Respectfully submitted,
6
Tom Allender
Planner
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
May 4, 1993
e Lot 6, Filing 1, Eaglebend Subdivision
Ken Harkias for James Robinson.
Single Family Residence
Final Design Review
0
PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION
Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended
conditions (X) Approved with modified conditions ( )
Continued ( ) Denied
Date .- -Patti Dixon, Secreta__
The Commission granted final design review approval with the condition of
an automatic irrigation system being added.
Q
L
1D
m
Z
O
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COAMISSION
May 4, 1993
Lot 14/15, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Commercial/Industrial Building
Conceptual Design Review
INTRODUCTION
T. J. Conners and Karl Bell, architect, are requesting another
conceptual design review for a proposed 57,600 square foot
commercial/industrial building on Lots 14 & 15, Blcck 1, Benchmark at
Beaver Creek. This represents a 2,400 square foot decreese from the
first review of this project, the overall length of the structure has
been reduced by 10 feet.
These lots are located on the west side of Metcalf Road, north of
Avon Auto Body and the recently approved Valley wide Plumbing
Building. They are approximately 2.79 acres in total area, the lots
slopes to the east toward Metcalf Road. The zoning is
IC-Industrial/Commercial.
The proposed buildings are four stories high. The exterior finish is
metal on the upper level, with a stucco product utilized on the lower
level. Colors will be presented at the hearing. The elevator shaft
has been moved to the front of the building to break up that facade.
The buildings utilized a metal mansard roof form. The top two floors
of each building would contain self storage mini warehouse space, the
bottom two level would contain spaces for service commercial
offices/warehouses.
As proposed, the two building exceed the maximum allowed height by a
few feet. A variance would be required, staff does not see this as a
major problem. The applicants would also be seeking a variance from
the required parking for the self storage units. This Commission has
granted a similar variance in the area in the past, staff has had no
problems with the parking at the location of the previous variance.
Other than the height slightly exceeding the maximum and the required
parking variance, the project appears to meet Town requirements.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Since this is a Conceptual Design Review,
recommendation will be provided.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
1. Introduce Application
2. Applicant Presentation
3. Commission Review/Discussion
Respectfully submitted
Tom Allender
Planner
no formal staff
BENCHMARK AT BEAVER CREEK
WATER TANK SITE
<c.2
W'H I TE RI V ER
N A T 1 0 N A L
�i I F J R E S T
O I
W
m
S t to
F 0 F E 5 T 5 E R V i C E A
P A R C E L 'A
n
,
1
B E N C H M A R K A T B E A V E R C REE K
O
iE 70
a n I
>• u Ib /
\�A � •EPS _�__ _
U • • w
A[YJY NT RMD
BENCHMARK AT BEAVER CHEEK �� y
a, D AN IA �
60
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
W May 4, 1993
Lot 65, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision
David Hymes & Sarah Smith
Single-family Residence
Conceptual Design Review//;O/(, Rgvr�
v ,�Y
INTRODUCTION
Dave Peel, architect, representing the owners, is requesting a
Conceptual Design Review for a proposed single-family residence on
Lot 65, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision. This lot is located on the
north side of Longsun Lane where it intersects Wildridge Road East.
It is approximately 0.46 acres in :;ize. The lot sloes to the
southeast at about 12 percent. The zoning is PUD with a duplex
designation.
The proposed structure has two levels with approximately 3000 square
feet of habitable space including the unfinished space above the
garage, :iut not including the garage. The structure, as proposed,
appears to be within all Town height, lot coverage and setback
restrictions.
The exterior is finished in stucco. Doors and windows will be clad,
finished in a "desert tan". Fascia will be 2X10 with a 1X4 shadow
board, a solid stain in "flagstone" will be utilized, Soffits will
be plywood, also in "flagstone". Color samples will be presented at
the hearing. The roof form is gabled, finished with Prestique I
High Definition Antique Slate, a 300# composition shingle product.
The site plan shows a driveway with a maximum grade that is
marginally over 10 percent, site drainage is directed away from the
structure, overall the finished grades are moderate. The landscape
plan is adequate on the south and east sides of the structure, the
northeast corner of the property could use some planting material.
The majority of the lot will be planted with a native seed mix. The
plans indicate irrigation will be left to the owners, a drip
irrigation system should be utilized. Exterior lighting has not
been discussed.
STAFF COMMENTS
Since this is a Conceptual Design
recommendation will be provided.
ACTION
Introduce Application
2. Applicant Presentation
Commission Review/Discussion
Respectfully submitted
C
Tom Allender
Planner
Review, no formal staff
M
00
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
4a May 4, 1993
Lot 65, Block 4, h Smith Subdiv_sion
David Hymes & Sarah Smithth
Single-family Residence
!401 Final Design Review
r
PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION
Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended
conditions ( ) Approved with moditied conditions (X)
Continued ( ) Denied
---
Date 5 2� �_ Patti Dixon, Secretar4�
Prnaert Isar given final approval pith I rnnditionc-
1. An automatic irrigation system be utilized.
2. Add plant mater -.al to N.W. corner of lot.
3. Use a less bright whi',:e on the stucco.