The URL can be used to link to this page

PZC Packet 061593STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION June 15, 1993 Page 1 Lot 14/15, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek T.J. Conners Variance from Required Parking and Maximum Allowed Height INTRODUCTION T. J. Conners and Karl Bell, architect, are requesting variance from required parking and maximum allowed height. The requests relate to a proposed 57,600 square foot commercial/industrial building on Lots 14 & 15, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek. These lots are located on the west side of Metcalf Road, They are approximately 2.79 acres in total area, the lots slopes to the east toward Metcalf Road. The zoning is IC-Industrial/Commercial. The lots have a 25 foot roadway eesement and a 110 foot utility easement along the front of the lot. The back 160 feet of the lot is to steep to be usable. The proposed building is four stories high. The top two floors of each building would contain self storage mini warehouse space, the bottom two level would contain spaces for service commercial offices/warehouses. As proposed, the two building exceed the maximum allowed height by four feet at the front facade and from four to zero feet on the south east corner of the roofs of each building. The applicants is also seeking a variance from the required parking for the self storage units. This Commission has granted a similar variance in this area in the past, staff has not heard of any problems with the parking at the location of the previous variance. STAFF COMMENTS: APPROVAL CRITERIA: Before acting on a variance request, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider the following factors. a. The relationship of the requested variance to existing and potential uses and structures in the vicinity. COMMENT: Metcalf Road in this area is dominated by warehouse type uses. Staff feels that this request would have little effect on the existing and potential uses Wind structures in the vicinity. b. The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity. STAFF REPORT TC THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION June 15, 1993 Page 2 Lot 14/15, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek T.J. Conners Variance from Required Parking and Maximum Allowed Height COMMENTS: Relief from the parking setback requirement is necessary to achieve uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity of Lot 14/15, a similar variance was granted on Lot 25. Due to the easements on the front of the lot and the steep terrain on the rear of the lot, this leaves little usable space, for this reason a height variance is necessary to achieve uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity. C. The effect of the requested variance on light and airs distribution of population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, an public safety. COMMENTS: The requested variance would have little effect on the above conditions or facilities other than the potential visual impact on Metcalf Road. d. Such other factors and criteria as the Commission deems applicable to the requested variance. COMMENTS: Staff has not identified other factors or criteria. FINDINGS REQUIRED: The Planning and Zoning Commission shall make the following findings before granting a variance: A. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privileVe inconsistent with the limitations on other properties in the vicinity. B. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. C. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons: i. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title; a o- '4 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION 0 June 15, 1993 Page 3 e Lot 14/15, Block 1, Benchmark ac Beaver Creek T.J. Conners Variance from Required Parking and Maximum Allowed Height ii. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the site of the variance that do no;: apply generally to other properties in the vicinity; iii. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the vicinity. STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND FINDINGS: Staff recommendation is for approval of the variances and would apply finding from Section 17.36.050 r,, B, Ci, Cii, and Cii. or C111. ACTION: 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, V Tom Allender Planner a ob A A -A STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION June 15, 1993 Page 4 Lot 14Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Con T.J. Conners Variance from Required Parking and Maximum Allowed Height PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as submitted ( ) Approved w.th recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) i Date Patti Dixon, Secretary The Commission tabled this item until the July 6, 1993 metinQ Ir IMAM j1JN 15 '93 10:4rGM GENESIS TECHNOLOGY INC. P.1/1 a i Our FAX number is 303-476-3.518 USA Our voice number is 303-476-3012 Attention.- Avon Design review Board From: Paul McGowan Subject: Vail -Avon Crmmercial Park Date: TUESDAY, JUNE 15, 1993 fiwd.1w, i/i Orn Qr0%.c I am writing this letter in support of the Vail -Avon Commercial Park as I feel that the facility is needed. We are considering occupying approximately 5000 square feet for our speaker development business. I know many other business -owners in the valley that are presently seeking square footage _rex nsion and this project is necessary to fulfill this demand. , Inc. VALLEY WIDE �. Mechanical, Inc.✓ .� The Professionals' go i June 8, 1993 Recording Secretary Planning and Zoning Commission Town of Avon PO Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 To Whom It May Concern: I do not have a problem with the variance Thomas Conners has requested for Lots 14 & 15, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek. His request for exceeding the allowed height by 4 feet on the front of the building and for waiving required parking for self storage are very reasonable and I wish him the best of luck. Sincerely, ��BV`'OL" S . 0, 6-'0 " LS Thomas S. D'Agostino, President Valley Wide Plumbing & Heating, Inc. P.O. BOX 5080 • AVON, COLORADO 81620 • (303) 949.1747 9 FAX (303) 845.7144 r a fes' STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION June 15, 1993 Lot 14/15, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Commercial/Industrial Building Final Design Review INTRODUCTION T. J. Conners and Karl Bell, architect, are requesting final design review for a 57,600 square foot commercial/industrial build4ng on Lots 14 & 15, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek. These lots are located on the west side of Metcalf Road, north of Avon Auto Body and the recently approved Valley Wide Plumbing Building. They are approximately 2.79 acres in total area, the lots slopes to the east toward Metcalf Road. The zoning is IC-Industrial/Commercial. The proposed building is four stories high. The exterior finish is metal on the upper level, with a stucco product utilized on the lower level. Colors will be presented at the hearing. An elevator shaft on the front of the building breaks up that facade. The buildings utiliaad a metal mansard roof form, which has been increased to it's original size in response to comments at the last review. The top two floors of each building would contain self storage mini warehouse space, the bottom two level would contain spaces for service commercial offices/warehouses. Concurrently the applicant has requested a variance to exceed the maximum allowed height by a few feet and relief from the required parking for the self storage units. This Commission has granted a similar parking variance in this area in the past, staff has not heard of any problems with the parking at the location of the previous variance. This project will also require tho vacation of the lot line dividing lot 14 and 15. The applicant has redesign the parking and loading configurat4in to enable trucks to reach the loading docks without blocking Metcalf Road. Signage will be presented at the hearing. Other than the height slightly exceeding the maximum and the required parking variance, the project appears to meet Town requirements. STAFF C0MMMNTS The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of the proposed project: 6.11 - The conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. COMMENT: This applicant is concurrently requestinc a variance for exceeding the maximum height allowed and for parking associated with the self storage units, and the property line between the lots will need to be vacated. otherwise the project appears to be in conformance with the Zoning Code and all other town of Avon rules and regulations. v44 k.,;- I STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION June 15, 1993 Lot 14/15, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Commercial/Industrial Building Final Design Review 6.12 - The suitability of the improvement, including type and quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located. COMMENT: These improvements, as proposed, are not inappropriate to the neighborhood. 6.13 - The compatibility of the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties. COMMENT: The project appears to have no adverse site impacts on adjacent properties and retains the access necessary to adjacent lots. 6.14 - The compatibility of the proposed improvement with site topography. COMMENT: Considering that this is a steep site, the project is relatively compatible with the site topography. 6.15 - The visual appearance of any proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. COMMENTS: The proposed improvements appear to be visually compatible with the neighborhood. 6.16 - The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. COMMENTS: Staff sees no conflict with this criteria. 6.17 - The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of he Town of Avon. COMMENTS: This proposal is in general conformance with the adopted goals, policies and programs of the Town of Avon. STAFF RECONMENDATION: :staff recommendation is for approval with the conditions that: 1. The grading plan be approved by the Town engineer. 2. The property line between Lot 14 and Lot 15 Le vacated. OWN •• STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION 40 June 15, 1993 PasLot 14/15, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Commercial/Industrial Building Final Design Review RECOMMENDED ACTION: 40 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Torn Allender Planner PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued L.Y- Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Date -�% Patti Dixon, Secretary :r The Commission tabled this item until the July b, 1993 meet ng. G i b 4 ' 1 r BENCHMARK AT BEAVER CREEK b i N I 12 1YI(]Rr+( N WATER TANK $ITE 1 _ENTER 1/♦ LCR. YC. 2 -- Is — �-— N M N :L o N yp { [[[ F O R E S T S E R V m t I P A c A Q� 1♦. C! ♦ 1 B E N C H M A R K A T B E A V E R C F E E K '0 ntcr• a J OO a _ W �}�� ✓ T.N tea% � � I _ �AU 6 UCAKU �k f q gotoy♦N! BENCHMARK AT BEAVER CREEK sotowAnt nnnru rwn \ SIXT, CREEK SUBDIH5ION ` FIUNG TRACI' 0 t r t OLD yY m L. L -�\ PLANNING AND ZONING CONIMISSION STAFF REPORT June 15, 1993 Lot 55, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Century 21 Building Sign Program Final Design Review Shapiro development Company and High Tech signs have developed a comprehensive sign program for the proposed Century 21 Building. The sign program includes provisions for awnings, neon signage, information kiosks and traffic directional signage. Staff feels the sign program is complete and appropriate to the building and it's location. There is some wording in the program, with regard to the 2nd floor area, which should be clarified. Staff feels this can be accomplished prior to the meeting. Staffrecomm:ndation is for approval. Respectfully Submitted Rick Pyhnan PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions r } Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( Conceptual, No Action Date Patti Dixon, Secret The Commission granted final design aonroval with the following conditions: 1. All awnings be installed at the same time per floor. 2. No less than 50% of each sign reflect the actual name of the business. 3. A maximum of three neon signs be allowed on the second floor per side of the building. 4. The language be clarified and the final sign program be approved by Staff. TECH Signs That Mean Business SIGN PLAN June 8, 1993 CENTURY 21 BUILDING LOT 55 - BLOCK 2 BENCHMARK AT BEAVER CREEK AVON, CO 81620 DEVELOPER Shapiro Development Company P.O. Box 5640, Avon, CO 81620 Introduction: It is the purpose of this sign plan to serve the communications needs of the landlord (Shapiro Development Co.( and the various tenants while creating an upscale, effective sign program commensurate with the building and surrounding area. The plan should meet the following criteria: 1. Identify the project and its tenants to vehicular and ,redestrian traffic. 2. Identify site circulation, including traffic and building entrances, parking and tenant locations. 3. Restrict other signage that doesn't meet these objectives. A. Purpose The purpose of this sign program is to serve as a guide for all initial and future exterior building identification and tenant signage. All signage shall be of superior quality and image and shall be compatible with the architecture and design of the Century 21 Building as well as surrounding structures and landscaping. B. General 1. TENANTAWNING SIGNAGE The building consists of commercial tenant space on the first floor and the second level, being equally divided between frontage on Avon Road and Benchmark Boulevard. There wiil be awnings, as shown in plans previously approved by the DRB on ",e first floor, and optional awnings on the second floor as shown in ExhibilsA& C. EacH awning section will contain one signage panel of a maximum display area of 7.5 square feet Allocation of these signage areas will be at the landlord's discretion. See Exhibit A" for typical placement of tenant awnings for each level See Exhibit B" for details of awning materials, colors and specifications 2. TENANT DISPLAY SIGNAGE Space is reserved for neon or other illuminated signs to be placed behind the center glass panels at the upper level as indicated in ExhibitsA &C. The landlord shall approve this sign. continued... P.O. Box 2688, Vail, CO 81658 • Production Center: 910 Nottingham Rd., S-2, Avon, CO 81620 Eagle / Summit Counties: 303.949-4565 • Aspen / Glenwood Springs: 303.945-6695 FAX: 303.949-4670 HIGHTECH SIGNS VAIL ./039494670 P.01 Shopirov-Sign Plan .2. Tenant space by each glass 'grouping' (between column elements) may contain a neon or other ilio, r,inated sign as approved by the landlord. First Floor tenants, at each glass grouping, may have tip to 10 square feet of such illuminated signage. in the event landlord elects not to install second floor awnings, neon or other illuminated signage may be substituted per window grouping. Each tenant with direst doorway access to the outside of the building may place name and business Identific tion signage directly upon, or behind the glass door. Additionally, business hours may alllo be so displayed. 3. BUILDING An internally back shown in Exhibits approve text and A similar or Identical southwest come - 4. FREE-STANDING I Up to four, free•stan Signs at the primary building (Avon Cem only. Al shall be inte form for final DRB at A four-sided kiosk be Illuminated int use by the comms F9 CM hted )halo effect) sign for the north east comer of the building as & C shall be permitted on the wall of the building. The landlord must 5. PARKING LOT SIGN The landlord reserves size and conforming t space for the purpose required 'handicappe 'Handicapped Parkinc 6. COLORS, LOGOS Awnings, where use in Exhibit Bfor disp throughout second Exhibit B. Awnings within prescribed ar surrounding colors a conb"nued... may be permitted on the exterior of the building at the JMENT SIGNS monument signs shall be allowed /see ExhlbltD,' nce areas will display building name plus na ne of adjacent i/ding/. Two, smaller signs shall be for directional information r Illuminated. Specific designs shall be forthcoming in specific al prior to Installation. Specific locations as Indicated on site plan, be constructed and located as shown in ExhibltD. This fixture will y and externally. Display area will be allocated by the landlord for tenants. to right to place Individual signs, not to exceed 12' x 18' each in standard'parking information configurations, for each parking f regulating usage of parking facilities. These signs will include zoning. There will be no reserved parking other than d TYPOGRAPHY shall be consistent throughout and of a Burgundy color as shown on the first floor. Second floor awnings, If used, will be exclusively )r of either matching Burgundy or Forest Green colot as shown in 7 signage will be illuminated and may contain logos and/or text Copy and logo colors shall be compatible with awnings and I shall be used at the discretion of the landlord. IHIGHTECH SIGNS VAIL 3039494670 P_p� �.A Shapi-o Sign Plan • ,3. q7. TEMPORARY SIGNA Temporary signage, is permanent signage, c a period not to exceet rary signs may not exc the landlord and shall 8. MISCELLANEOUS All the following shall 21 Building; 1. Tenants sh< of tem 2. AJI mountin In corn 3. The landicr under Exhibits Included: A. Current, B. Awning C. Enlarger D. Current nti;ying a new tenant, in the absence of, or during production of nature and size acceptable to the landlord, shall be allowable for 30 days from the date of permanent signage application. Tempo - ed 7.5 square feet. Placement shall be allowed at the discretion of re for a strictly limited time frame. applicable to meet the general sign requirements of the Century be responsible for obtaining all proper permits prior to installation Crary or permanent signs. components, fasteners and electric service and equipment 4hall be lete compliance with all applicable codes and regulations. shall have the right to approve all contractors used by the tenant its sign program. ord's 4/Color rendering I; styles, fabrics, colors building center section >rd's Site Plan and monument sign drawing STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION June 15, 1993 Lot 62, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision Jerry McMahan Design Change Request Eric Vogelman, representing Jerry McMahan is requesting approval for a design change for the southwestern style home under construction on Lot 62, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision. The specific request is to add an additional garage bay to the approved two car garage. Staffs only concern is the grading between the new garage and the drive appears to exceed a 2:1 bank. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approval conditional on the applicant providing staff with a grading plan that does not have grades that exceed 2:1. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, V v Tom Allender Planner PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved assubm t`�ed ( ) Approved with recommended conditions Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) 't awn ( ) Date Patti Dixon, Secretary The Commission granted approval to the request to add an additional bay to ^orrect the grading concern. ILOCK 3 -ET 2 OF 6 v 58 53 52 TT 1 2 3 Tj SJ BLOCK 4 51 __ SHEET 3 OF 6 52 W3,r" SI 38 RIDGE 37FERRET LANE 36 3a t. 9 �sz sit �5O 1, 61 69 Be 47 67 20 7 7 3 46 59 2 16 15 i0 42 :4 41 31 45 BLOCK 5 38 39 4 14 SHEET 6 OF 6 32. 1 34 56 47 43 0" 33 48 52 29 91 '09 54 I 92 an 27 i9\ 2/ 97 94 Z ,796 IDS 9 N,JUNE CREE4 97 TRA14 Wt 104 a 03 TRACT 9 77 \too az '4 81 02 4 TO 51 720 Vi 3 101 TE 5 1. 5 4 aB 33 31 50 34 54 56 17 21- 3 it 6 35 31 -BLOCK 2 48 TPAA*T M SHEET 4 OF 6 4 18 9 39 20 16 65 66 40 26 1 it 2 58 43 5 22 9342 2A23 SEC. 2 BLOCK I SHEET 5 OF 6 PLANNING AND ZONING JUNE 15, 1993 Mr. Stan Barrows Lot 6, Block 5, Wildrid'3e Conceptual Design Review Page 1 PROJECT TYPE. 2 -three plexes ZONING. PUD -6 units COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES SITE PLAN: Average slope of lot. 28 Percent Max. Slope of Driveway. 10 Percent Lot Coverage. 7 Percent Driveway is paved. yes Parking provided is adequate. yes Snow storage is adequate. yes Grading plan is adequate. yes Landscape plan is adequate. no Plant sizes meets criteria. no Meters are on building. Meets setback requirements. yes unknown Other site plan issues. Boulder retaining walls are utilized. Landscape plan was not provided. BUILDING: Habitable Space. 1,000 Square feet per unit. Maximum Height. 29 Feet. Roof Form. Off set gable. Material Color Roofing asphalt medium brown Walls, Dominant stucco dark tan Walls, Other none Fascia wood off white/tan Soffits wood off white/tan Windows wood off white/tan Window Trim wood off white/tan Doors wood off white/tan Door Trim wood off white/tan Other building issues. Trash enclosure is stucco with asphalt shingles. STAFF COMMENTS OR CONCERNS: Staff has no comments IN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION W JUNE 15, 1993 Mr. Stan Barrows Lot 6, Block 5, Wildridge • Conceptual Design Review Page 2 ®1® STAFF As this is a conceptual review staff makes no recommendation. RECOMNENDED ACTION: 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Tom Allender Planner PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as submitted ( ) conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Approved with recommended Approved with modified conditions ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action (V/) Date — Patti Dixon, Secretartic - - c No formal action was taken. The Commission felt this was a very much improved nrolect. ^hey made some suggestions regarding the architecture and materials LOCK 3 _ ' `- :ET 2 OF 6 SEC. 26 6 yd SJ 52 it 1 2 S i! TK 34 - BLOCK 4 = 51 SHEE i 3 OF 6 26 9 55 yp 6 4 • 6] 25 56 494d 4'l', 7 e 7 2 57 ° 90 9 IC II 12 7 1.19 20 64 27 ] T 17 29 44. .. 73 26 Apr:. ... 22 3] p 43 89 42 & OXOTE RIDGE � 21 31 TH BB R ° 74 i 34 J2 0. 55 87 B6 ` J956 54 39 94 83 B2 15 SB 37 71 72 73 g 31 36 3T 33 36 52 49 SI 50 49-EEQRE7 80 70 LANE 36 .�-8:... 39 61 69 lib 20 7 47 ... e7 52 66 Y 46 6 5 69 2 1 19 9 43 64 IB 16 4 � i \ 1'N•7 ; ii• 42 I BLOCK 5 31 JB ... 39 40 45 / SHEET 6 OF 6 46 34 32 Al 333, 48 51 90 .2 29 29 55 .'` 91 109 _. 23 t9 92 x µ . � 24 27 1`.19 M B7 l 93 •G95 94 07 -�2 4 6 23 106 10 ..:. BS 96 UNE CREEK '9! i .. ` 97 103 9 79 9B 104 B TRAIL S f 99 03 6 TNACT t! / 3 TD .. 7] SI 32 9 t01 3 TE I�2 50 54 a d 4 37 32 76 48 17 1 ` .� J 3 5 34 IB I _ 6 BLOCK 2 49 35 36 Y3 — Z 7 57 / SHEET 4 OF 64 29 I9 ;.' T 46 � 5 66 � t' 13 67� 44 40 26 I w T}ttCT d1 23 2 'SJ 43 ez 2•2J;i4 'TNiCf �• SEC. 2 BLOCK I \ SHEET 5 OF 6 8 tlb ,1 • ab Mb STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING ANn ZONING COMMISSION June 15, 1993 Page 1 Lot 4, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Automobile Service Center and Car Wash Mr. Ron Bifani Conceptual Design Review IWMODUCTION: Ronald Bifani is proposing to construct and operate a full service Goodyear Automotive Service Center and Car Wash, (no gasoline sales) on Lot 4, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision. Lot 4 is a 70 acre Neighborhood Commercial (NC) zoned lot located on Nottingham Road. It is the western most lot in that commercial area, and is adjacent to Buck Creek. The property west of Buck Creek is zoned residential and is developed with multifamily projects. The project, as proposed would service bays, 2 automatic car space, and 1 accessory apartment would provide full service auto limited auto accessory sales and include 8 interior automotive wash bays, office and storage for employees. The business service and repair, tire sales, car washing. The main level of the structure would house the 8 service bays, the office, and the automatic car washes. The apartment would be in the upper level, and storage in the basement. The exterior would be predominantly finished in split -faced block, the upper level would be finished in cedar board siding . The roof form on the front of the structure is gabled with a dormer, the roof over the service bays will be flat. Fiberglass shingles will be the finish material. Colors will be presented in the hearing. As submitted, this proposal meets all Town height, setback and lot coverage requirements. This proposal received a Special Review Use approval only for the automobile service and repair component of the project. The car washes and the accessory apartments are uses by right. The conditions placed on that approval are: The Planning and that potential residential prope during the desi critical to revie building archite storage, noise planning. Zoning Commission should ensure negative impacts to the rty to the west are addressed gn review process. Factors w include the lighting plan, cture, landscape buffers, trash buffers, and general site 1. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION June 15, 1993 Page 2 Lot 4, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Automobile Service Center and Car Wash Mr. Ron Bifani Conceptual Design Review 2. The catch basin design must ensure that any site runoff is filtered and all oil, gasoline, soap, or suspended material be removed prior to discharge. 3. No underground storage tanks be allowed. No auto repair or service will take place outside. There will be no storage of junk vehicles or miscellaneous parts outside. All trash receptacle and used tires waiting for proper disposal shall be stored in a well screened area. At a previous conceptual review this Commission was concerned with the garage doors facing the residential area to the west, the noise associated with the operation when the garage doors are open, the arrangement of the landscaping, lack of landscaping to the east and south, and the long flat roof. The roof form has be altered, the landscape material has been rearranged, and a planting strip has been added to the east boundary, although no plant material is shown in the strip. The applicant will also provide noise information and a color rendering Lt the hearing. STAFF COMMENTS: Since this is a Conceptual Design Review, recommendation will be provided. ACTION: 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review/Discussion Respectfully submit: -ed Tom Allender Planner no formal staff — -- CEYiP 7/1 CW SEC IORL /\ — — — — — — WATER TANK 4 — I I v. C E A N N E X A T I ON A R C E L 'A' I I I .•.cr e alwnaE >wM 1 fe� �9.q. ► euAci e RLD I 4�4 p•>, a eebill O maOS n V 1. D a +L j n SOVM t(. H COP. SEC. 1 :f Imo' R •wr.�uW[ n m'4 I MMG : c� q1 P CFN9bp .LL1M1. ♦ v M 4' EEK wE�vw '014 14 PA' n""i°x05 ao'� a eE� SUNROAD SUBDI%190N usa ° 94 a •rh row �•� w e I \ rpu4 HD \ o CE AT AVON &) I � tf Q YL94[ M I OYM \ \ 3 ' ., v a+,cI c (D 8 C N C H M A R K A T BEA VER CrRE E K CLD WHITE R I v E R N A T I O N A L F O R E S' ---04- .IT _O4AKT I /MOS n p w.n . 7• ` ttwwn fhTeMc a a GILD WHITE R'VER N A T I O N A L V 0 R E PYPa r SWIFT GULCH ADDITI • ` .vn a June 15th, 1993 TO: Avon Flannina_ Town of Avon Avon Municipal POB 975 Avon, Colorado Commission Comp 1 e:; 81620 n SE VICE CENTER. INC. FM: Ron Bifani - Applicant Golden Eagle Service Center, Inc. POB 7547 Breckenr dae, Colorado 80424 RE: NOISE STUDY OF IMPACT WRENCHES Dear Commissioners. Upon the Commissioners request, I found that the Breckenridge Fire Department owned a Simpson Decimeter; and one of their employees, Mike Craig, could operate the OSHA approved decimeter that could measure the decibel rating of the questioned "impact wrench" used in the process of changing tires. This is by far the noisiest piece of equipment that would be used in the shop. According to the operating manual, the operational sound specifications, when impacting, is 99 dba.. From 65 feet, the clear distance from the shop door to the western property line of Lot 4, MiKe determined that the decimeter consistently measured 70 to 75 decibels while the wrench was continuously impacting. From the attached information sheet, this rating would compare to the low end range of a truck: passing that point, machinery or normal street noise. However, it was also determined that loudness depends on the physical intensity and duration of the sound. Very brief bursts of sound. as with the impact wrench, are less loud than longer bursts. In summary, the impact wrench would not cause any more noise than the traffic an the adjacent I-70 Interstate or Nottingham Road, and would be less loud when considering the intermittant duration of the sound. Respectively Submitted, Ron Bifani, Applicant and Owner of Golden Eagle Service Center, Inc. G (� 0DY-11YE R 10092 HWY 9. FRENCH CREEK CENTER. • P.O. BOX 7547. BRECKENRIDGE. CO 80424 • (303) 453 1823 I"1 Allow 812 Loschmidt's number these animals are nocturnal .and fend mostly on insects, although they also eat fruit and eggs. The gestation period for the bushbaby is about 17 weeks: usually, only one or two young are horn, though females have four mammary glands, two of which are. inguinal. The young remain in the nest and are not carried about by the mother. These animals mature in about 20 months. They have a peculiar habit of constantly licking their hands and feet as they climb in the trees, but the s:gnificannc of this action is unknown. See I.Fmux; lL M.NIALIA; PRIMATES. [CHARLES R. CORTIN] Loschmidt's number The number of molecules in 1 ml of a perfect gas at 1 atm pressure and 0°C. It is found by dividing the Avogadro number by the normal molar volume or normal gram -molecular volume in milliliters. Its value is VA719~_-0.0001 x 1019 orna/ml. See Avo. GADRO NUa111ER. [THOMAS C. WADDINGTON] Loudness The perceptual intensity of sound. Loudness de. pends importantly on the physical intensity of sound, increasing when physical intensity in. creases and decreasing when physical intomity decreases. But loudness also depends on other physdeal properties of sound, such as frequency and duration. Sound waves with frequencies be. twcen 1000 and 5000 hrru (Hz) are louder than sound waves that have the same, intensity but lower or higher frequencies. Very brief bursts of sound are lcsa loud than arc longer bursts, loud- ness increasing regularly as duration increases up Lee about 0.1-0.2 s. beyond which point in time, loudness no longer increases with increasing dura• tion. Sound Pressure Leval, Loudness dB sones 130 512 120 let plane 256 110 128 100 truck 64 90 o 32 .80—. .machinery lli i 70' e t street noises 0 100 1000 10,000 60 Fig. 2. Relationship between loudness level in phor 4 {{ ordinary coriveriation 40 ; 1:I 30 quiet office 20whisper— 10 0954 . thresholds 0 .. i • :al Fig. 1. Decibel and loudness scales of common sounds. 120• M 100 100phons 7 60 o s. •: phons 40 ,40 20 .threshold , 0 100 1000 10,000 frequency, Hz Fig. 2. Relationship between loudness level in phor and sound pressure level for audible frequencies. Decibels. In most work, the physical level sound is expressed in decibels (dB). Decibels a: units that denote relative intensity ur pressure.. of sound. One: bel is defined as the logarithm to ;I. base 10 of the ratio of a given sound intensity to reference intensity. A decibel is one-tenth of a bc. Hence, a decibel level of 10 dB mearts an iniensir 10 times that of the reference: a level of 20 d! means an inludsky 100 time., the reference. Although decibels are defined primarily in term of relatise intensity, sound levels are temially me_ curt of In units of sound pressure. Under most cir cumstances, the intensity of it sound wave is pro preniunal, stilt to its pressure, but to the square'. Its pressure. A sound whose pressure is 10 time: that of the reference, therefore, has an intensity 100 times the reference. and decibel level of 20 dB Thu most commonly used reference level for deet bel scales is a sound pressure of 0.00002 nuwian me. When expressed in terms of this reference ; decibel level is called sound pressure level OL; Typical SPLs of sonic ordinary sounds are: a wlas per, 20 dB; a quiet office. 30 d1l; sure%" noises. 60- 70 A a truck. 100 dB: a jet plane. 120 dB IN. li. Phens. Because loudness depends on sound frequency as well as sound intensity or pressure. different stimuli with the came SPL may not be equally loud. One type of decibel scale. Balled the ph, a scale, overcomes this deficicncy.'file level -if a sound in phons is the SPL in decibel% of an equally loud 1000•Ha tone. Thus A 1000 Ha -lone 91 40 -dB SPI. has a level of 40 phuna, as do all other sounds that equal its loudness. even though these other sounds may have SPLs much greater than 40 dR. Figaro 2 shows the relationship between decf bels SPL and phuns in terms of several equal - loudness contours. The lowest curve Is tine audibil• ity function, the absolute threshold for sound. Note that Are equal -loudness curves become flatter and Hatter at higher and higher levels of loudness. This Hmtcning is most evident at low frequencies. In other words, the higher the intensity, the more closely phon levels correspond with SPI. through' out the range of audible frequencies. Loud sounds (70-100 phuna) with the samc fre' i1) 'd SSSS899£0£ 'ON Xdd 00100SINdt811 00 11WWf1S 8b21 MI £6-8 -Nflf PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION S JUNE 15, 1993 Ron Preston for Parkwood Realty, Inc. Lot 18, Block 1, Wildridge ® Conceptual Design Review Page 1 PROJECT TYPE. 4-Plex ZONING. PUD 4 -Units COMPLIES WITH ZONING? NO SITE PLAN: Average slope of lot. 10 Percent Max. Slope of Driveway. 7 Percent Lot Coverage. 1.5 Percent Driveway is paved. yes Parking provided is adequate. yes Snow storage is adequate. yes Grading plan is adequate. yes Landscape plan is adequate. yes Plant sizes meets criteria. yes Meters are on building. meeting Meets setback requirements. no unknown Other site plan issues. As proposed the building encroaches into the northern side yard setback. BUILDING: Habitable Space Maximum Height. Roof Form. Roofing Walls, Dominant Walls, Other Fascia Soffits Windows Window Trim Doors Door Trim 1800 Square feet per unit. 37 Feet Utilizes gables, hips and dormers. Material Color asphalt shingles at meeting cedar siding at meeting stucco w stone at meeting 2 X 10 cedar at meeting T-111 at meeting aluminum clad at meeting 1 X 4 cedar at meeting painted metal at meeting stucco at meeting Other building issues. As proposed the interior units have roof that are 37 feet tall, the maximum allowed in this zone is 35. STAFF COMMENTS OR CONCERNS: As proposed this project does not meet zoning due to height and setback requirements. I • o• J PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION JUNE 15, 1993 Ron Preston for Parkwood Realty, Inc. Lot 18, Block 1, Wildridge Conceptual Design Review Page 2 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: As this is a conceptual review, staff has no recommendation. Approval RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Tom F�llender Planner PLANNING AND ZONING ACTIUN Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action Pil Date Patti Dixon, secretary As this was a conceptual review, no action was taken. The Commissio felt that this project was well done and urged the applicant to proceed, but suggested that he provide a very good landscape plan at time of final design review. to A loll PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT June 15, 1993 Tract N, Wildridge subdivision . Wildwood Public Works Facility Final Design Review PROJECT TYPE: Municipal Facility r ZONING: PUD COMPLIES WITH ZONING? Yes SITE PLAN: Average slope of lot. Max. slope of driveway. Lot coverage. Driveway is paved. Parking provided is adequate. Snow storage is adequate. Grading plan is adequate. Landscape plan is adequate. Plant sizes meet criteria. Meters are on building. Meets setback requirements. 20% Flat N/A Yes Yes Yes Yes Will Bring to Meeting See Above Yes Yes Other site plan issues. Boulder retaining walls, native grasses and earth sheltered approach present a minimum impact to this site. BUILDING: Habitable Space. 44'x %' three bay garage facility Maximum Height. 23' Roof Form. Earth Sheltered - Native Grass MATERIAL COLOR Roofing Earth & Grass Natural Walls, Dominant Concrete To be presented Walls, Other N/A N/A Fascia N/A N/A Soffits N/A N/A Windows/Trim N/A N/A Doors/Trim Metal Painted To be presented Other Building Issues: PLANNING AND ZONING CONMSSION STAFF REPORT Ma June 15, 1993 Tract N, Wildridge Subdivision o Wildwood Public Works Facility Final Design Review l4m STAFF COMMENTS OR CONCERNS: None STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval conditioned upon color selection and landscape plan. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Rick Pylman ODEPLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tract N, Wildridge Subdivision Wildwood Public Works Facility Final Design Review PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: v Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) r Date d�AmPatti Dixon, Secretary The Commission granted final design review approval with th— condition that the meters be on the building STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION June 15, 1993 Page 1 Lot 14/15, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek T.J. Conners Variance from Required Parking and Maximum Allowed Height INTRODUCTION T. J. Conners and Karl Bell, architect, are requesting variance from required parking and maximum allowed height. The requests relate to a proposed 57,600 square foot commercial/industrial building on Lots 14 & 15, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek. These lots are located on the west side of Metcalf Road, They are approximately 2.79 acres in total area, the lots slopes to the east toward Metcalf Road. The zoning is IC-Industrial/Commercial. The lots have a 25 foot roadway easement and a 110 foot utility easement along the front of the lot. The back 160 feet of the lot is to steep to be usable. The proposed building is four stories high. The top two floors of each building would contain self storage mini warehouse space, the bottom two level would contain spaces for service commercial offices/warehouses. As proposed, the two building exceed the maximum allowed height by four feet at the front facade and from four to zero feet on the south east corner of the roofs of each building. The applicants is also seeking a variance from the required parking for the self storage units. This Commission has granted a similar variance in this area in the past, staff has not heard of any problems with the parking at the location of the previous variance. STAFF COMMENTS: APPROVAL CRITERIA: Before acting on a variance request, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider the following factors. a. The relationship of the requested variance to existing and potential uses and structures in the vicinity. COMMENT: Metcalf Road in this area is dominated by warehouse type uses. Staff feels that this request would have little effect on the existing and potential uses and structures in the vicinity. b. The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION • June 15, 1993 Page 2 � Lot 14/15, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek. T.J. Conners Variance from Required Parking and Maximum Allowed Height COMMENTS: Relief from the parking setback requirement is necessary to achieve uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity of Lot 14/15, a similar variance was granted on Lot 25. Due to the easements on the front of the lot and the steep terrain on the rear of the lot, this leaves little usable space, for this reason a height variance is necessary to achieve uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity. C. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, an public safety. COMMENTS: The requested variance would have little effect on the above conditions or facilities other than the potential visual impact on Metcalf Road. d. Such other factors and criteria as the Commission deems applicable to the requested variance. COMMENTS: Staff has not identified other factors or criteria. FINDINGS REQUIRED: The Planning and Zoning Commission shall make the following findings before gr-.nting a variance: A. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties in the vicinity. B. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. C. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons: i. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with t:e objectives of this title; s14 ?'N STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION June 15, 1993 Page 3 Let 14/15, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek T.J. Conners Variance from Required Parking and Maximum Allowed Height ii. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the vicinity; iii. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the vicinity. STAFF RECONHENDATION AND FINDINGS: Staff recommendation is for approval of the variances and would appl;, finding from Section 17.36.050 A, B, Ci, Cii, and Cii. or C111. RECOIIItMED ACTION: 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, V Tom Allender Planner ^ 0% 00r 100,1 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION June 15, 1993 Page 4 ILot,.�® 14/15, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek ® T.J. Conners Variance from Required Parking and Maximum Allowed Height r PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued Denied ( ) Wi drawn ( ) i Date Patti Dixon, Secretary The Commission tabled this item until the July 6, 1993 m eeting JUN 15 '93 10:47AM GENESIS TECHNOLOGY INC. Our FAX number is 303-476-3518 USA Our voice number is 303-476-3012 i Attention: Avon Design Review ,Board From: Paul McGowan Subject: Vaii-Avon Commercial Park Date: TUESDAY, JUNE 15, 1993 Fwdulinn in progress I I am writing this letter in support of the Vail -Avon Commercial Park as I feel that the facility is needed. We are considering occupying approximately 5000 square feet for our speaker development business. I know many other business -owners in the valley that are presently seeking square footage �nsion and this project is necessary to fulfill this demand. 1c. P.I'1 a J r VALLEY WIDE Mechanical, Inc. 'The Professionals' June 8, 1993 Recording Secretary Planning and Zoning Commission Town of Avon PO Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 To Whom It May Concern: b 'j 1 )993 I do not have a problem with the variance Thomas Conners has requested for Lots 14 & 15, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek. His request for exceeding the allowed height by 4 feet on the front of the building and for waiving required parking for self storage are very reasonable and I wish him the best of luck. Sincerely, Thomas S. D'Agostino, President Valley Wide Plumbing & Heating, Inc. P.O. BOX 5080 • AVON, COLORADO 81620 • (303) 949.1747 • FAX (303) 845-7144 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION June 15, 1993 Lot 14/15, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Commercial/Industrial Building Final Design Review INTRODUCTION T. J. Conners and Karl Bell, architect, are requesting final design review for a 57,600 square foot commercial/industrial building on Lots 14 & 15, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek. These lots are located on the west side of Metcalf Road, north of Avon Auto Body and the recently approved Valley Wide Plumbing Building. They are approximately 2.79 acres in total area, the lots slopes to the east toward Metcalf Road. The zoning is IC-Industrial/Commercial. The proposed building is four stories high. The exterior finish is metal on the upper level, with a stucco product utilized on the lower level. Colors will be presented at the hearing. An elevator shaft on the front of the building breaks up that facade. The buildings utilized a metal mansard roof form, which has been increased to it's original size in response to comments at the last review. The top two fluors of each building would contain self storage mini warehouse space, the bottom two level would contain spaces for service commercial offices/warehouses. Concurrently the applicant has requested a variance to exceed the maximum allowed height by a few feet and relief from the required parking for the self storage units. This Commission has granted a similar parking variance in this area in the past, staff has not heard of any problems with the parking at the location of the previous variance. This project will also require the vacation of the lot line dividing lot 14 and 15. The applicant has redesign the parking and loading configuration to enable trucks to reach the loading docks without blocking Metcalf Road. Signage will be presented at the hearing. Other than the height slightly exceeding the maximum and the required parking variance, the project appears to meet Town requirements. ST"F COMMENTS The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of the proposed project: 6.11 - The conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. COMMENT: This applicant is concurrently requesting a variance for exceeding the maximum height allowed and for parking associated with the self storage units, and the property line between the lots will need to be vacated. Otherwise the project appears to be in conformance with the Zoning Code and all other town of Avon rules and regulations. i• STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION r June 15, 1993 Lot 14/15, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Commercial/Industrial Building Final Design Review 6.12 - The suitability of the improvement, including, type and quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located. COMMENT: These improvements, as proposed, are not inappropriate to the neighborhood. 6.13 - The compatibility of the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties. COMMENT: The project appears to have no adverse site impacts on adjacent properties and retains the access necessary to adjacent lots. 6.14 - The compatibility of the proposed improvement with site topography. COMMENT: Considering that this is a steep site, the protect is relatively compatible with the site topography. 6.15 - The visual appearance of any proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. COMMENTS: The proposed improvements appear to be visually compatible with the neighborhood. 6.16 - The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. COMMENTS: Staff sees no conflict with this criteria. 6.17 - The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of the Town of Avon. COMMENTS: This proposal is in general conformance with the adopted goals, policies and programs of the Town of Avon. STAFF RECOMENDATION: Staff recommendation is for approval with the conditions that: 1. The grading plan be approved by the Town engineer. 2. The property line between Lot 14 and Lot 15 be vacated. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION • June 15, 1993 Lot 14/15, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek w Commercial/Industrial Building Final Design Review RECOMMENDED ACTION: 0 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Tom Allender Planner PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Date Patti Dixon, Secretary �1 y nAcr A P BENCHMARK AT BEAVER CREEK >w v N WATER TANK SITE ///•••�� INTER lI1 COR. SEC.2 -- -- r•__ Ltd F—' __ NEST r/1 COR. SEC 1 _� I 1 II F O R E S T S E R V I m jYf= I P A R m i i r•.cr n ) B E N C H M A R K A T B E A V E R C R E E K b n.n n O News . 1 a o . O o u m Ar OO AAMR.w a $// AiE Tp ` a .N tCp S` _ t, OEA1IR_ �G S1ME tA[L% �••.nr4�5 r rR 1/1 COR. SEC_�r —_ .qR N0p5 BENCHMARK AT BEAVER CREEKRLD VARK r K A f�l•RMi-aaiiw niNmof[ Al A. I °4.s I r r - { BENCHMARK AT BEAVER CREEK SPA, OLD N Z I (NOTTINGHAM LAKE) A, L cJ ` �. 1 ie. WCMOCYMUY� e'f SLNRNQ Al.VphMS.TT ° ISHNYN4uS W A r l^% c A.CN "SR v.�A 4A, D AGrNFKr M+� b 9 T\\��F ETRw;;THHCSON��'L •-_ 1O.Kr L� 1 A'r"Ae00wR� n�ww� 0 L/�-`r.6 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT June 15, 1993 Lot 55, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Century 21 Building Sign Program Final Design Review Shapiro development Company and High Tech signs have developed a comprehensive sign program for the proposed Century 21 Building. The sign program includes provisions for awnings, neon signage, information kiosks and traffic directional signage. Staff feels the sign program is complete and appropriate to the building and it's location. There is some wording in the program, with regard to the 2nd floor area, which should be clarified. Staff feels this can be accomplished prior to the meeting. Staff recommendation is for approval. Respectfully Submitted Rick Pylman PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions (r ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( l Date Patti Dixon. Secret The Commission granted final design approval with the following conditions: 1. All awnings be installed at the same time per floor. 2. No less than 50% of each sign reflect the actual name of the business. 3. A maximum of three neon signs be allowed on the second floor per side of the building. 4. The language be clarified and the final sign program be approved by Staff, "I C "TECH SIGNS Signs That Mean Business SIGN PLAN June 8, 1993 CENTURY 21 BUILDING LOT 55 - BLOCK 2 BENCHMARK AT BEAVER CREEK AVON, CO 81620 DEVELOPER Shapiro Development Company P.O. Box 5640, Avon, CO 81620 Introduction: It is the purpose of this sign plan to serve the communications needs of the landlord (Shapiro Development Co.) and the various tenants while creating an upscale, effective sign program commensurate with the building and surrounding area. The plan should meet the following criteria: 1. Identify the project and its tenants to vehicular and pedestrian traffic. 2. Identify site circulation, including traffic and building entrances, parking and tenant locations. 3. Re-trictother signage that doesn't meet these objectives. A. Purpose The purpose of this sign program is to serve as a guide for all initial and future exterior building identification and tenant signage. Al signage shall be of superior quality and image and shall be compatible with the architecture and design of the Century 21 Building as well as surrounding structures and landscaping. B. General 1. TENANT AWNING SIGNAGE The building consists of commercial tenant space on the first floor and the second level, being equally divided between frontage on Avon Road and Benchmark Boulevard. There will be awnings, as shown in plans previously approved by the DRB on the first floor, and optional awnings on the second floor as shown in ExhibitsA & C EacH awning section will contain one signage panel of a maximum display area of 7.5 square feet. Allocation of these signage areas will be at the landlord's discretion. See Exhibit A" for typical placement of tenant awnings for each level See Exhibit B" for details of awning materials, colors and speurications. 2. TENANT DISPLAY SIGNAGE Space is reserved for neon or other illuminated signs to be placed behind the center glass panels at the upper level as indicated in ExhibitsA &C. The landlord shall approve this sign. continued.. P.O. Box 2688, Vail, CO 81658 • Production Center: 910 Nottingham Rd., S-2, Avon, CO 81620 Eagle / Summit Counties: 303.949-4565 • Aspen I Glenwood Springs: 303.945-6695 FAX: 303.949-4670 Shapirra/_cign Plan .2. Tenant space by each or other illuminated sit grouping, may have u landlord elects not to i be substituted per win HIGHTECH SIGNS VAIL 3039494670 ass 'grouping' (between column elements) may contain a neon as approved by the landlord. First floor tenants, at each glass to 10 square feet of su-h illuminated signage. In the event tall second floor awnings, neon or other illuminated signage may )w grouping. Each tenant with direttl doorway access to the outside of the building may place name and business identific tion signage directly upon, or behind the glass door. Additionally, business hours may all4o be so displayed. k�:1�11U71�Ce] SIGN An Internally backlighted (halo effects sign for the north east corner of the building as shown in ExhibfdA &',C shall be permitted on the wall of the building. The landlord must approve text and desk A similar or Identical sign may be permitted on the exterior of the building at the southwest corner. r 4. FREE-STANDING MONUMENT SIGNS Up to four, free-standing monument signs shall be allowed (see Exhlb&D). Signs at the primary eAtrance areas will display building name plus name of adjacent building (Avon Centerguildingl.. Two, smaller signs shall be for directional information only. Ali shall be inte ally Illuminated. Specific designs shall be forthcoming in specific form for final DRB app oval prior to Instaliation. Specific locations as Indicated on site plan. A four-sided kiosk shallbe constructed and located as shown in Exhiblt D. This fixture will be Illuminated internally and externally. Display area will be allocated by the landlord for use by the commercial; tenants. 5. PARKING LOT SIGNS The landlord reserves a right to place Individual signs. not to exceed 12' x 18' each in size and conforming t standard parking information configurations, for each parking space for the purpose pr regulating usage of parking facilities. These signs will Indude required 'handicapped' zoning. There will be no reserved parking other than 'Handicapped Parking,. 6. COLORS, LOGOS arjd TYPOGRAPHY Awnings, where used, shall be consistent throughout and of a Burgundy color as shown in Exhibit 6for display on the first floor. Second floor awnings, If used, will be exclusively throughout second floor of either matching Burgundy or Forest Green color as shown in Exhibit B Awnings and signage will be illuminated and may contain logos and/or text within prescribed areas. Copy and logo colors shall be compatible with awnings and surrounding colors anti shall be used at the discretion of the landlord. continued... P.01 Shapiro Sign Plan W .3. _ 7. TEMPORARY SIGNA Temporary signage, Ic permanent signage, c a period not to exceei rary signs may not exc the landlord and shall S. MISCELLANEOUS Al the following shall 21 Building: 1. Tenants shz of tem 2. Al mountin In torr 3. The landlor under Exhibits Included: A. Current, B. Awning C Enlarger D. Current HIGHTECH SIGNS VAIL 3039494670 !ntilying a new tenant, in the absence of, or during production of a nature and size acceptable to the landlord, shall be allowable for 30 days from the date of permanent signage application. Tempo - ed 7.5 square feet. Placement shall be allowed at the discretion of >e for a strictly limited time frame. applicable to meet the general sign requirements of the Century be responsible for obtaining all proper permits prior to instillation xary or permanent signs. components, fasteners and electric service and equipment shall be lete compliance with all applicable codes and regulations. shall have the right to approve all contractors used by the tenant its sign program. Ord's 4/Color rendering I; styles, fabrics, colors building center section >rd's Site Plan and monument sign drawing P.02 IN mmwmmm— ILOCK 3 EET 2 OF 6 Pot r 2' -3 22 21 34 20 H 87 94 to. IO 85 96 I JNE CREEK 9397 94 TRAIL 7 80 75 .92 74 77 a. I T 151 52 33 T, 12 so 3 32 54 5 49 34 31 BLOCK 2 40 _. 35 36 — SHEET 4 OF 6 .,/\J7 BLOCK 4 SHE U 3 OF 6 RIDGE LANE 42 2 41 BLOCK 5 SHEEN 6 OF 6 TRACT x 4 4 3 44 2 TRACT 10 -2 A SEC, 2 BLOCK I SHEET 5 OF 6 it �.s STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION June 15, 1993 Lot 62, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision Jerry McMahan Design Change Request Eric Vogelman, representing Jerry McMahan is requesting approval for a design change for the southwestern style home under construction on Lot 62, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision. The specific request is to add an additional garage bay to the approved two car garage. Staffs only concern is the grading between the new garage and the drive appears to exceed a 2:1 bank. aTAFF RECOMMENDATION Approval conditional on the applicant providing staff with a grading plan that does not have grades that exceed 2:1. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, V Tom Allender Planner PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as subm' ed ( ) Approved with recommended conditions Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) 't awn ( ) Date Patti Dixon, Secretary The Commission granted approval to the request to add an additional bay to correct the grading concern. '0-A PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION JUNE 15, 1993 Mr. Stan e Lot 6, Blockck 5, Wildridge Conceptual Design Review am Page 1 PROJECT TYPE. 2 -three plexes 1,000 Square feet per unit. ZONING. PUD -6 units 29 Feet. COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES SITE PIAN: Off set gable. Average slope of lot. 28 Percent Max. Slope of Driveway. 10 Percent Lot Coverage. 7 Percent Driveway is paved. yes Parking provided is adequate. yes Snow storage is adequate. yes Grading plan is adequate. yes Landscape plan is adequate. no Plant sizes meets criteria. no Meters are on building. wood Meets setback requirements. yes Other site plan issues. Boulder retaining walls are utilized. Landscape plan was not provided. BUILDING: unknown Habitable Space. 1,000 Square feet per unit. Maximum Height. 29 Feet. Roof Form. Off set gable. Material Color Roofing asphalt medium brown Walls, Dominant stucco dark tan Walls, Other none Fascia wood off white/tan Soffits wood off white/tan Windows wood off white/tan Window Trim wood off white/tan Doors wood off white/tan Door Trim wood off white/tan Other building issues. Trash enclosure is stucco with asphalt shingles. STAFF COARSENTS OR CONCERNS: Staff has no comments O 04 6�--, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TUNE 15, 1993 Mr. Stan Barrows Lot 6, Block 5, Wildridge Conceptual Design Review as Page 2 STAFF As this is a conceptual review staff makes no recommendation. ACTION: 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Tom Allender Planner PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ✓) Date Patti Dixon, Secretarw_ No format action was taken. The Commission felt this was a very much improved project. They made some suggestions regarding the architecture and materials ,LOCK 3 1, TET 2 OF 6 SEC. 26 58 53 52 TI 2 3 T 7K 5.\ BLOCK 4 51 4 ooI r SHEET 3 OF 5 26 S 13 21 .2 5 55 50 6 4 2] 69 48 .. 7 56 47 � 49 9 24 5 7 20 1 90 64 2> 4 9 IC II 12 1 19 23 29 4 7 17 29 80 IB 2S 22 4344 09 75 26 33 yp 42 R A 27: OVOTE RIDGE 21 31 TM 88 74 34 32 4, 55 97 06 ]8 SB 8° 83 02 54 58 19 55 57 71 72 73 49 9 36 37 53 60 37 36 52 SI SO FERRET LANE 36 39 48 61 tl 47 67 20 7 62 66 j 46 63 65 y h• �. 69 6 19 9 2 67 Ifi • 16 ay t 1 a0•y1 �a/ 3 15 f0 ' •...<2 44 4o 42 /. i '2 ° •p �, 35 � 41 31 BLOCK BLOCK 5 36 39 4645 SHEET 6 OF 6 32 .4 35 a a7 43 34 33 48 52 90 p 79 55 1 23 [R y 53 1 � 9 09 54 I 9 92 24 9 O 9a 25.6 O 2 4 `86 107 I1 - 06 10 8j, 85 6 9697 105 9 7 ? 1 ONE CREEK - TRAIL - \79 98 104 8 5 eo 7y 99 103 6 TRACT R � 74 77 \ 100 $2 eI oz 3 ° t0 W y -73 52 3 u 5 Y 3 ,. SI 9 \101 � TE ?2 50 54 \ o y 4 49 }4 35 ]+ 1 6 a 6 2 3 6 17 ' { _ y 6 BLOCK 2 48TIPA 3s 36 SHEET 4 OF 6 _7p 47 2918 e6 r 69 4y 39 227?0 16 66 68 15 67 44 40 26 I 0 SB 43 41 25 22 - .\ N, 11 b3 42 24 23 �z A � TRACT IO SEC 2 BLOCK I SHEET 5 OF 6 II6 ' 10 a e STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION June 15, 1993 Page 1 Lot 4, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Automobile Service Center and Car Wash Mr. Ron Bifani Conceptual Design Review INTRODUCTION: Ronald Bifani is proposing to construct and operate a full service Goodyear Automotive Service Center and Car Wash, (no gasoline sales) on Lot 4, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision. Lot 4 is a .70 acre Neighborhood Commercial (NC) zoned lot located on Nottingham Road. It is the western most lot in that commercial area, and is adjacent to Buck Creek. The property west of Buck Creek is zoned residential and is developed with multifamily projects. The project, as proposed would include 8 interior automotive service bays, 2 automatic car wash bays, office and storage space, and 1 accessory apartment for employees. The business would provide full service auto service and repair, tire sales, limited auto accessory sales and car washi.ng. The main level of the structure would house the 8 service bays, the office, and the automatic car washes. The apartment would be in the upper level, and storage in the basement. The exterior would be predominantly finished in split -faced block, the upper level would be finished in cedar board siding . The roof form on the front of the structure is gabled with a dormer, the roof over the service bays will be flat. Fiberglass shingles will be the finish material. Colors will be presented in the hearing. As submitted, this proposal meets all Town height, setback and lom coverage requirements. This proposal received a Special Review Use approval only for the automobile service and repair component of the project. The car washes and the accessory apartments are uses by right. The conditions placed on that approval are: 1. The Planning and that potential residential prope during the desi critical to revie building archite storage, noise planning. Zoning Commission should ensure negative impacts to the rty to the west are addressed gn review process. Factors w include the lighting plan, cture, landscape buffers, trash buffers, and general site A-•4% STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION June 15, 1993 Page 2 Lot 4, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Automobile Service Center and Car Wash Mr. Ron Bifani Conceptual Design Review 2. The catch basin design must ensure that any site runoff is filtered and all oil, gasoline, soap, or suspended material be removed prior to discharge. 3. No underground storage tanks be allowed. 4. No auto repair or service will take place outside. There will be no storage of junk vehicles or miscellaneous parts outside. All trash receptacle and used tires waiting for proper disposal shall be stored in a well screened area. At a previous conceptual review this Commission was concerned with the garage doors facing the residential area to the west, the noise associated with the operation when the garage doors are open, the arrangement of the landscaping, lack of landscaping to the east and south, and the long flat roof. The roof form has be altered, the landscape material has been rearranged, and a planting strip has been added to the east boundary, although no plant material is shown in the strip. The applicant will also provide noise information and a color rendering at the hearing. STAFF COMMENTS: Since this is a Conceptual Design recommendation will be provided. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Prese.itation Commission Review/Discussion Respectfully submitted Tom Allender Planner Review, no formal staff �•` CENnR 1/4 cm SEC t 1 I I E S T S E R V I C E A N N E k A T 1 0 N P AR CEL 'A' i I �JIII rn.c� e ^Y�N r:L.D - ` •� t ., meg( »«" � ro vo� eu — Y,Y._� ro 1. ILrj .wWI .] .S .O L .]!YI ro ior�¢ EEK c ].,A ' Ui fi 11 `t /♦ ecsT BKST e.ua OLDi 5OUT4 I/� COR. RHD SUB0 IS a KU4 J/ r •� f •V \ \ E AT AVJti �\ ` \ \ ..ON Sl.rp. \ \ ,�� YCBI{F ,SOY( 4YfR \ ♦ \`� TR ♦ \ WATER TANK9� —_ —• -- _ T..]r e O ,1 poi A WT a P ,f O WH I TE RI VER N A T 1 0 N A L F 0 R E S O I O I 't I . OLD I ZBENCHMA tont• c RKA T E A V E R C R E E K CLD ] •♦ WHITE RIVER \ 519 N A T I O N A L FOR E o I fq \ O o S'MFT GULCH AODM \ rYy ] Let,. owrstc uq¢ coaos . \ r kal June 15th, 1993 TO: Avon Planning Town of Avon Avon Municipal POB 975 Avon, Colorado Commission Complex 816^0 n ,-, SERVICE CENTER, INC. FM: Ron Bifani - Applicant Golden Eagle Service Center, Inc. POB 7547 SrecE::enridge, Colorado 80424 RE: NOISE STUDY OF IMPACT WRENCHES Dear Commissioners. Upon the Commissioners request, I found that the BrecF::enridge Fire Department owned a Simpson Decimeter; and one of their employees, Mik:e Craig, could operate the OSHA approved decimeter that could measure the decibel rating of the questioned "impact wrench" used in the process of changing tires. This is by far the noisiest piece of equipment that would be used in the shop. According to the operating manual, the operational sound specifications, when impacting, is 99 dba.. From 65 feet, the clear distance from the shop door to the western property line of Lot 4, Mil -..e determined that the decimeter consistently measured 70 to 75 decibels while the wrench was continuously impacting. From the attached information sheet, this rating would compare to the low end range of a trucF:: passing that point, machinery or normal street noise. However, it was also determined that loudness depends on the physical intensity and duration of the sound. Very brief bursts of sound, as with the impact wrench, are less loud than longer bursts. In summary, the impact wrench would not cause any more noise than the traffic on the adjacent I-70 Interstate or Nottingham Road, and would be less loud when considering the intermittant duration of the sound. Respectively Submitted, Ron Bifani, Applicant and Owner of Golden Eagle Service Center, Inc. F GOOD -YEAR 1n" 11"' ` _! . , -- - `� --- P.O. BOX 7547, BRECKENRIDGE, CO 80424 - Q03) 453 1823 812 Loschmidt's number hese animals are nocturnal and fend mo. .1 on insects, although they also eat fruit and eggs. The gestation period for the bushbaby is about 17 weeks; usually, nnly one or two young are born, though females have four mammary glands, two of which arc inguinal. The young remain In the nest and are not carried about by the mother. These animate mature in about 20 months. They have a peculiar habit of constantly licking their hands and feet as they climb in the trees, but the significance of this action is unknown. Sec LF-MUR; MAMNALLA; PRIMATES. [CHARLES R. CURTIN] Loschmidt's number The number of molecules in 1 ml of 4 perfeet gas at 1 atm pressure and O'C. It is found by dividing the Avogadro number by the normal molar volume or normal gram -molecular volume in milliliters. Its value is 2.68719:t: 0.0001 x lots ums/nil. See Avo. GADRO NUMBER. [THOMAS C. WADDINGTON] Loudness The perceptual intensity of sound. Loudness de- pends importantly on the physical intensity of sound, inereaeing when physical intensity in- creases and docreasiog when physical intensity decreases. But loudness also depends on other phy=_foal proparlfes of sound, such as frequency and duration. Sound waves with fi-equencfes be. twren 1000 and 5000 here 1Hz) are louder than sound wave.5 that have the same intensity but lower or higher frequencies. Very brief bursts of sound are less loud than are longer bursts, loud- ness increasing regularly as duration increases up to about 0.1-0.2 s, beyond which point in time. loudness no longer increases with Increasing dura- tion. Sound Pressure Level, CIS Loudness sones 130 512 120 jet plane --256 110 128 100 -truck-- 64 90 32 80 machinery 16 70' 8 Street noises 60 4 .. 50 ++< 2 :? ordinary conversation 40 1 ':I 30 quiet office 5 t1 20 whisper .2 10 .085,4 ` threshold 0 i fi¢.I. DecO..rl and loudness scales of common sounds. 140 120.' m 100 phons 9100 . - - .f. J ..1.. .. BC _ 70 phons . 60 vF� R 40 40 phom; . 20 . threshold 0 100 1000 10= frequency, Hz Fig. 2. Relationship between loudness level in char and sound pressure level for audible frequencies. Decibels. In most work, the phy-sinal level sound is expressed in decibels (dB). Decibels or unite that denote relative intensity or pressure of sound. One bel is defined as the logarithm to tit, base 10 of the ratio of a given sound intensity to reference intensity. A decibel is one. -tenth of a bcl Henec, a decibel level of 10 dB meats an imensir 10 times that of the reference; a level of 20 dl means an intensity 100 times the reference. Although decibels are defined primarily in term of relathe intensity, sound levels are usually mai cured in units of sound pressure. under most cit cumstances, Lite intensity of a sound wave is pit, portional, not to its pressure, but to the square o its pressure. A sound whose pressure is 10 time: that of the reference, thrrofore. has an inteu;ily 100 timr-s the reference. and decibel level of 20 dl1 The most commonly used reference level for dcri bel scales is a sound pressure of 0.00002 ucwtor ms. When expressed in terms of this reference . docibcl level is called sound proseure level OLt Typical SPLs of sonic ordinary sounds are: a whit per, 20 dB; a quiet office, 30 dR; streel noises, 60- 70 A a truck. 100 dB; a jet plane, 120 dI3 (Fig. D. PhOnS. Because loudness depends on sound frequency as well as sound inter>ity or pressure• different stimuli with the same SPL may not be equally loud. One type of decibel scale, called the phun Seale, overcomes this deficiency. The level -if a sound in phuns is the SPL in decibeli of an equally loud 1000 -Hz tone. Thus a IUUU HL -tope si 40-11B SP1. has a level of 40 phone, as do all other sounds that equal its loudness. even thought these other sounds may have SPLs much greater than 4C dB, I'Sl2 allows the relationship between deci bels SPL and phons in terms of several equal loudness contours. The lovem curve is the audibil- ity function, the absolute threshold for sound. Note that the aqua' !cudnem curves become flatter and Railer at higher and higher levels of loudness. This Battening is most evident at low frequencies. In other words, the higher lite intensity, the more clusely phun levels correspond with SPI. through' out lite range of audible frequencies. Loud sounds (70-100 pitons) with the sane fre- IO'd 5595899£0£ 'ON XdJ 03100SM'811 00 11WWAS 8b1Zi 3M £6-8 -NM PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION JUNE 15, 1993 Ron Preston for Parkwood Realty, Inc. Lot 18, Block 1, Wildridge Conceptual Design Review Page 1 PROJECT TYPE. 4-Plex ZONING. PUD 4 -Units COMPLIES WITH ZONING? NO SITE PLAN: Average slope of lot. 10 Percent Max. Slope of Driveway. 7 Percent Lot Coverage. 16 Percent Driveway is paved. yes Parking provided is adequate. yes Snow storage is adequate. yes Grading plan is adequate. yes Landscape plan is adequate. yes Plant sizes meets criteria. yes Meters are on building. Meets setback requirements. no unknown Other site plan issues. As proposed the building encroaches into the northern side yard setback. BUILDING: Habitable Space. Maximum Height. Roof Form. Roofing Walls, Dominant Walls, Other Fascia Soffits Windows Window Trim Doors Door Trim 1800 Square feet 37 Feet Utilizes gables, Material asphalt shingles cedar siding stucco w stone 2 X 10 cedar T-111 aluminum clad 1 X 4 cedar painted metal stucco per unit. hips and dormers. Color at meeting at meeting at meeting at meeting at meeting at meeting at meeting at meeting at meeting Other building issues. As proposed the interior units have roof that are 37 feet tall, the maximum allowed in this zone is 35. STAFF COMMENTS OR CONCERNS: As proposed this project does not meet zoning due to height and setback requirements. aPLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION JUNE 15, 1993 Ron Preston for Parkwood Realty, Inc. Lot 18, Block 1, Wildridge Conceptual Design Review Page 2 • STAFF RECOMMENDATION: As this is a conceptual review, staff has no recommendation. Approval RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Tom Allender Planner PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date Patti Dixon, Secretary As this was a conceptual review, no action was taken. The Commissio felt that this project was well done and urged the applicant to proceed, but suggested that he provide a very good landscape plan at time of final design review. 04 0% 114 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT _ June 15, 1993 Tract N, Wildridge subdivision _ Wildwood Public Works Facility Final Design Review PROJECT TYPE: Municipal Facility ZONING: PUD COMPLIES WITH ZONING? Yes SITE PLAN: Average slope of lot. Max. slope of driveway. Lot coverage. Driveway is paved. Parking provided is adequate. Snow storage is adequate. Grading plan is adequate. Landscape plan is adequate. Plant sizes meet criteria. Meters are on building. Meets setback requirements. 20% Flat N/A Yes Yes Yes Yes Will Bring to Meeting See Above Y es Yes Ocner site plan issues. Boulder retaining walls, native grasses and earth sheltered approach present a minimum impact to this site. BUILDING: Habitable Space. 44'x 50' three bay garage facility Maximum Height. 23' Roof Form. Earth Sheltered - Native Grass MATERIAL COLOR Roofing Earth & (irass Natural Walls, Dominant Concrete To be presented Walls, Other N/A N/A Fascia N/A N/A Soffits N/A N/A Windows/Trim N/A N/A Doors/Trim Metal Painted To be presented Other Building Issues: t• PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT June 15, 1993 Tract N, PSubdivision � Wildwood Public Works Facility Final Design Review C STAFF COMMENTS OR CONCERNS: None STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval conditioned upon color selection and landscape plan. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Rick Pylman .. PLANNING AND ZONING CONOWSSION STAFF REPORT Tract N, Wildridge Subdivision Wild -wood Public Works Facility Final Design Review s PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION; Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date Patti Dixon, Secretary The Commission granted final design review approval with th— condition that the meters be on the building