Loading...
PZC Packet 070693START: "%� r•. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION July 6, 1993 Page 1 Lot 14/15, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek T. J. Conners Variance From Required Parking and Maximum allowed Height r'ublic Hearing INTRODUCTION: T. J. Conners and Karl Bell, architect, are requesting variance from required parking and maximum allowed height. The requests relate to proposed 57600 square foot commercial industrial building o- .ots 14 and 15, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek. These lots are located on the west side of Metcalf Road. They are approximately 2.79 acres in total area, the lots slope to the east toward Metcalf Road. The zoning is IC- Industrial/Commercial. The lots have a 25 foot roadway easement and a 110 foot utility easement along the front of the lot. The back 160 feet of the lot is too steep to be usable. The proposed building is four stories high. contain self storage mini warehouse spaces, for service commercial offices/warehouses. The top two floors of each building would the bottom two levels would contain spaces As proposed, the t:vo buildings exceed the maximum allowed height by four feet at the front facade and from four to zero feet on the south east corner of the roofs of each building. The applicant is also seeking a variance from the required parking for the self storage units. Thus Commission has granted a similar variance in this area in the past. Staff has not heard of any problems with the parking at the location of the previous variance. The total building area is 57,600 square feet. At the required 1 parking space per 800 square feet of building area, the required parking would be 72 spaces. The parking provided is 58 spaces for a variance of 14 parking spaces. The building square footage is split, 28,600 to warehouse and 28,800 to mini storage. The warehouse space at I per 800 requires 36 parking spaces, leaving 22 spaces for the mini storage portion of the building. STAFF COMMENTS: APPROVAL CRITERIA: Before acting on a variance request, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider the following factors: •• STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION July 6, 1993 Page 2 Lot 14/15, block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek T. J. Conners Variance from Requires Parking and Maximum Allowed Height � Public Hearing a. The relationship of the requested variance to existing and potential uses and structures in the vicinity. COMMENT: Metcalf Road in this area is dominated by warehouse type uses. Staff feels that this request would have little effect on the existing and potential uses and structures in the vicinity. b. The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity. COMMENTS: Relief from the parking setback requirements is necessary to achieve uniformity or treatment among sites in the vicinity of Lot 14/15, a similar variance was granted on Lot 25. Due to the easements on the front of the lot and the steep terrain on the rear of the lot, this leaves little usable space, for this reason a height variance is necessary to achieve uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity. c. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety. COMMENT: The requested variance would have little effect on the above conditions or facilities other than the potential visual impact on Metcalf Road. d. Such other factors and criteria as the Commission deems applicable to the requested variance. COMMENT: Staff has not identified other factors or criteria. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION July 6, 1993 Page 3 Lot 14/15, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek T. J. Conners Variance from Required Parking and Maximum Allowed Height Public Hearing FINDINGS REQUIRED: The Planning and Zoning Commission shall make the following findings before granting a variance. A. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties in the vicinity. B. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. C. that the variance is warranted for one or more of the follo•Mng reasons: i. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title; ii. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the vicinity; iii The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the vicinity. STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND FINDINGS: Staff recommendation is for approval of the variances and would apply findings from Section 17.36.050 A, B, Ci, Cii, and Ciii. [(e STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION July 6, 1993 Page 4 Lot 14/15, Brock 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek T. J. Conners Variance from Required Parking and Maximum Allowed Height Public Hearing RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Open Public Hearing 4. Close Public Hearing 5. Commission Review 6. Commission Action Respectfully submitted Rick Pylman �i � r STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION July 6, 1993 Page 5 I.ot 14/15, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek T. J. Conners Variance from Required Parking and Maximum Allowed Heigl : PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted (•)'*' Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn () Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date 7�6,�3 Sue Railton, Secretary The Commission granted approval to the variance request for the required parking and for the requested height variance, citing the following findings: A. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the lunitations un other propertleS hi he vicinity. B. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health or olfi;r. Qv materially injurious tr+; t the vicinity. C. That the variance is warrented for the^following±reasons: i. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title; and e specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of OtherPropertiesin the vicinity .. M JUN 15 '93 10: 47AM GENESIS TECHNOLOGY INC. ,,;: ,v Our FAX number is 303-476-3513 USA Our voice number is 303-476-3012 Attention: Avon Design Review Board Ev,.,luiion in prrgrus.r From: Paul McGowan Sub;ect: Vail -Avon Commercial Park Date; TUESDAY, JUNE 15, 1993 1 am writing this letter in support of the Vail -Avon Commercial Park as I feel that the facility is needed. We are considering occupying approximately 5000 square feet for our speaker development business. ,I I I know many other business -owners in the valley that are presently seeking square footage rex nsion and this probe --t is necessary to fulfill this demand. , Inc. P.1/1 10 ,s• h�'N O :-] 0 Mechanical, Inc r T1� The'Pro(essionals' .�..�+e...a�.3.w•:..u..�Yvi�".u�s... .'�w[iut'aS'I'i�1a '�u't'w".v^^''" June 8, 1993 Recording Secretary Planiing and Zoning Commission Town of Avon PO Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 To Whom It May Concern: 70livAi I do not have a problem with the variance Thomas Conners has requested for Lots 14 & 15, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek. His request for exceeding the allowed height by 4 feet on the front of the building and for waiving required parking for self storage are very reasonable and I wish him the best of luck. Sincerely, Aov" S . q)' Aq's"�' , e"'<S Thomas S. D'Agostino, President Valley Wide Plumbing & Heating, Inc. P.O. BOX 5080 9 AVON, COLORADO 81620 0 (303) 949-1747 • FAX (303) 8457144 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION June 15, 1993 Lot 14/15, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Commercial/Industrial Building Final Design Review INTRODUCTION T. J. Conners and Karl Bell, architect, are requesting final design review for a 57,600 square foot commercial/industrial building on Lots 14 & 15, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek. These lots are located on the west side of Metcalf Road, north of Avon Auto Body and the recently approved Valley Wide Plumbing Building. They are approximately 2.79 acres in total area, the lots slopes to the east toward Metcalf Road. The zoning is IC-Industrial/Commercial. The proposed building is four stories high. The exterior finish is metal on the upper level, with a stucco product utilized on the lower level. Colors will be presented at the hearing. An e'evator shaft on the front of the building breaks up that facade. ::he buildings utilized a metal mansard roof form, which has been increased to it's original sive in response to comments at the last review. The top two floors of each building would contain self storage mini warehouse space, the bottom two level would contain spaces for service commercial offices/warehouses. Concurrently the applicant has requested a variance to exceed the maximum allowed height by a few feet and relief from the required parking for the self storage units. This Commission has granted a similar parking variance in this area in the past, staff has not heard of any problems with the parking at the location of the previous variance. This project will also require the vacation of the lot line dividing lot 14 and 15. The applicant has redesign the parking and loading configuration to enable trucks to reach the loading docks without blocking Metcalf Road. Signage will be presented at the hearing. Other than the height slightly exceeding the maximum and the required parking variance, the project appears to meet Town requirements. STAFF COMMENTS The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of the proposed project: 6.11 - The conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable.rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. COMMENT: This applicant is concurrently requesting a variance for exceeding the maximum height allowed and for parking associated with the self storage units, and the property line between the lots will need to be vacated. Otherwise the project appears to be in conformance with the Zoning Code and all other town of Avon rules and regulations. r STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION June 15, 1993 Lot 14/15, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Commercial/Industrial Building Final Design Review 6.12 - The suitability of the improvement, including type and quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located. CONTENT: These improvements, as proposed, are not inappropriate to the neighborhood. 6.13 - The compatibility of the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties. COMMENT: The project appears to have no adverse site impacts on adjacent properties and retains the access necessary to adjacent lots. 6.14 - The compatibility of the proposed improvement with site topography. COMMENT: Considering that this is a steep site, the project is relatively compatible with the site topography. 6.15 - The visual appearance of any proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. COMMENTS: The proposed improvements appear to be visually compatible with the neighborhood. 6.16 - The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. COMMENTS: Staff sees no conflict with this criteria. 6.17 - The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of the Town of Avon. COMMENTS: This proposal is in general conformance with the adopted goals, policies and programs of the Town of Avon. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION • July 6, 1993 Lot 14/15, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek ® Commercial/Industrial Building Final resign Review MI® STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Subject to submission and approval of grading and drainage plan prior to application for building permit. kevise grading to confine grading operation within property lines and drainage easements, eliminate grading in street, provide appropriate erosion control in drainage swales and provide for detention and treatment of parking lot drainage in accordance with Town of Avon regulations. 2. Floor plans must match site plan dimensions. 3. Address grades at ramps and parking lot to fire department satisfaction. 4. address snow storage requirements. 5. Address architectural treatment of retaining walls. It is the opinion of the Staff that although there are many positive attributes to this project, and there is an identified community need, the request for two variances, the grading problems, the steepness of the parking and ramp areas and the sheer quantity of retaining wall indicates that too much building is being forced onto this site. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION July 6, 1993 Lot 14/15, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Commercial/Industrial Building Final Design Review RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted Rick Pylman PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( 0 Approved with modified conditions ( ) continued ( ) Denied (✓)" Withdrawn () Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date 6 A-3 Sue Railton, Secretary development is too large for the site. PLANNING j1ND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT • July 6. 1993 Lot 4, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision 0 Golden Eagle Automotive Service Center Final Design Review PROJECT TYPE: Final Design Review ZONING: NC COMPLIES WITH ZONING? Yes SITE PLAN: Average slope of lot. Max. slope of driveway. Lot coverage. Driveway is paved. Parking provided is adequate. Snow storage is adequate. Grading plan is adequate. Landscape plan is adequate. Plant sizes meet criteria. Meters are on building. Meets setback requirements. Other site plan issues BUILDING: Habitable Space. Maximum Height. Roof Form. Roofing Walls, Dominant Walls, Other Fascia Soffits Windows/Trim Doors/Trim Other Building Issues: 6% 4% 66% Yes Yes 14 Spaces Yes Yes Yes Yes Exceeds Minimum Standards Unknown Yes N/A 25 Ft. Gable & Flat MATERIAL Asphalt Split Face Block Board & Batten Cedar Plywood Aluminum COLOR Gray/Brown Gray/Beige Milkweed mqe PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT low July 6, 1993 Lot 4, Block 1 Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision 1,02 Golden Eagle Automotive Service Center Final Design Review STAFF COMMENTS OR CONCERNS: All issues raised at Conceptual Reviews have been addressed STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommendation is for approval. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted", C ' ' �-Wvl Rick Pylman YHOMPSON HUGHES SYSTEMS(I Mr. Norman Wood Avon Planning Office P.O. Box 975 Avon, Colorado 81620 Fax*: 949-9139 Aol� 00') RIN 3 0 1993 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Re: Golden Eagle Service Center Lot 4, Block 1 . Benchmark at Beaver- Creek. Gear Mr. Wood: Thank you for your thoughts yesterday, regarding the design of our catch basins, and the use of the Claycomb report. Bruce Lewis of High Country Engineering told me that they have it, and will pull it out this morning, so that we may bring to you a design for these surface drainage filtering systems, for your meeting on July 6th. You should be receiving todey, our lighting plan for the Site, via Federal Express. It shows 6 small bollard lights, three along each edge of the parking Accompanying this plan is a catalog cut of the fixture. Please note that it is designed to project light downward, and only on one side. I think this will provide what little lighti ng v+e need along tire edges, and the rest of our lighting will come from recessed can downlights located under our building overhangs. All in all, I think we have a lighting layout and spec. which will not disturb )ur neighbors. I trust that you receiver; the colored building elevations we sent last week. These show the accomplishment of several changes which were discussed by the P&Z on the 15th of June: > We changed the sidi ng on the second floor spar tment to cedar vertical batten type, which hel ps to unify the apartment uud die --ice bay roof together. > We made the west side ma er the service bay doors much deeper, with less space between the top of doors and the batten Biding. We think this is an improvement over the narrow band we had before. We changed the roofing shingle color from black to gray, with a touch of brown in it. I am unsure as to whether our rendering did the color justice, but we will bring samples of the shingles, siding and the split -face block to your meeting next week. The colored Site Plan we had submitted last time has ch3riged a bit, as you can see by looking at the bluelines re sent last week. We will bring another color -%4 Site Plan over to hang before your meeting starts. The changes include: > Landscaping along the east edge of the site, including Blue Spruce and willow trees. > Trees located along the south edge of our parking, adjacent to the •acstbound 1-70 entrance ramp. I have some serious rest, vations about placing trees here, because of our proximity to the ramp, %,. hich I am certain will cause whatever we piant to be buried in plowed snow and and from ;he highway ramp. There is considerable evidence of road sand in this area, and it tells me that our plantings along that edge will probably rot last very long. > We have changed the placement of the trees in our western -side river setback area, such that the two clusters we had shown in the central area are now spread out into one larger cluster. P.O. BOX 530 • BASAI r, COLORADO, M621 • (303),)27-4768 • FAX (303) 927-9168 to [• [• lab This will create a greater visual and sound barrier between the western service bay doors and the residential building to our west. We have altered the dumpster area to show an enclusure, which is to be made of split -face block. I believe that these changes in the design have addressed all of the concerns I heard at the last P&Z meeting, on June 15th. With the exception of the trees along the south edge, I think that all of the concerns expressed hove resulted in improvements to our design. If the Board generally agrees with me, that the trees along the south edge will probably suffer from burial by Highway snowplowing, we will be happy to add them to the plantings along the western edge, near Buck Creek. If not, we will leave them as currently shown. Once again, Norman, thank you for all of your help! I look forward to meeting you on the 6th of July, at our final Design Review hearing. Very truly yours, Thompson Hughes 5 stems Inc Michael P. Thompson AIA V.P. Design •• PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT July 6, 1993 Lot 4, Block 1 Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Golden Eagle Automotive Service Center Final Design Review PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted (✓) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) DateSue Railton, Secretary The Commission granted final design approval with the following conditions: 1. Roofing product be textured and other than black, with the recommendation of the blue/gray 2. TH siding be used and brought back for approval. 3. Cut sheet of lights and revised plan. 4. Revised elevation with a roof enclosure over the trash. 5. The sign program be presented at a later date. PLANNING AND ZONING CONLMISSION STAFF REPORT a July 6, 1993 Lot 1, Block 3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Sunridge Phase II Color Change we Final Design Review At the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of June 1, 1993, the Board approved a color change for Sunridge Phase II to a Cape Cod Gray body, Brown windows and Forest Green deck rails and fascia. Bonnie Havlick, manager of Phase II is requesting an amendment to that approval. The owners desire to substitute Arden Green for the Forest Green fascia and deck rail color. Color samples will be presented at the meeting As a color change, Staff has no formal recommendation. Respectfully Submitted Rick Pylman PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted (✓� Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date 10 3 Sue Railton, Secretary/ -'r The Commission granted final design approval for the requested color change as submitted. W do a rON PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT July 6. 1993 Lot 18, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision s Fourplex Final Design Review PROJECT TYPE: Fourplex, Final Design Review ® ZONING:PUD Fourplex COMPLIES WITH ZONING? Yes SITE PLAN: Average slope of lot. 10% Max. slope of driveway. 6% Lot coverage. 16% Driveway is paved. Yes Parking provided is adequate. Yes Snow storage is adequate. Yes Grading plan is adequate. Yes Landscape plan is adequate. Yes Plant sizes meet criteria. Yes Meters are on building. Yes Meets setback requirements. Yes Other site plan issues None BUILDING: Habitable Space. 1800 Sq. Ft. per unit Maximum Height, 35 Ft. Roof Form. Gable and hip Roofing Walls, Dominant Walls, Other Fascia Soffits Windows/Trim Doors/Trim Other Building Issues: MATERIAL Asphalt Wood 8" Lap Stucco 2 x 10 rough sawn T -I I plywood Aluminum/ Ix4 trim Metal COLOR To be presented Meter panels • losed on building wall a PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT a July 6, 1993 Lot pl Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision WEFourplex Final Design Review STAFF COMMENTS OR CONCERNS: Building height and setback concerns at conceptual review have been corrected. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommendation is for approval ACTION: 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Rick Pylman K40 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ON July 6, 1993 • ■s Lot 18, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Fourplex Final Design Review PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted (✓) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date 6 3 Sue Railton, Secretary The Commission granted Final design approval with the following condition: 1. The landscape plan be amended to double the amount of aspens which should be a minimum two inch caliper, and six additional spruce or pines, minimum o ?O" "'1 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT July 6. 1993 Lot 87, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision McNeil Residence Final Design Review PROJECT TYPE: Single Family, Final Design Review ZONING:PUD Duplex COMPLIES WITH ZONING? Yes SITE PLAN: Average slope of lot. 32% Max. slope of driveway. 4% Lot coverage. 90/0 Driveway is paved. Yes Parking provided is adequate. Yes Snow storage is adequate. Yes Grading plan is adequate. Yes Landscape plan is adequate. Yes Plant sizes meet criteria. Yes Meters are on building. No Information Meets setback requirements. Yes Other site plan issues BUILDING: Habitable Space. 2625 Sq. Ft. Maximum Height. 27 Ft. Roof Form. Gable MATERIAL COLOR Roofing Asphalt Presidential Slate Gray Walls, Dominant 1x8 Lap Channel Cedar Stonehedge Walls, Other Stucco ??? Fascia 1x4 &2x8 cedar Heritage Blue Soffits Plywood Windows/Trim Wood Clad/Ix4 cedar Bronze/Hert. Blue Doors/Trim Wood Other Building Issues: Flues painted to match roof a eR4 pi'1 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT am July 6, 1993 Lot 87,Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision . McNeileil Residence Final Design Review STAFF COMMENTS OR CONCERNS: 1. Meter location and stucco color need to be identified. 2. Grading cuts and retaining wall be eliminated in 10' slope maintenance easement. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommendation is for approval RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, 1tC C-W� Rick Pylman • ?ON en) • PLANNING AND ZONING COIVMSSION STAFF REPORT • July 6, 1993 Lot 87, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision NcNeil Residence Final Design Review PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted (W Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn /( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date (0 3 Sue Railton, Secretary The Commission granted final design approval with the following conditions: 1. The building be moved approximately 10 feet south, thus enabling the retaining wall of the street side to be tiered. 2. Four deciduous trees be added. [• a D A01 ."� PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT July 6, 1993 Lot 69, Block Wildridge Subdivision onBrethauer Single Family Final Design Review PROJECT TYPE: Single Family, Final Design Review ZONING: PUD Duplex COMPLIES WITH ZONING? Yes SITE PLAN: Average slope of lot. Max. slope of driveway. Lot coverage. Driveway is paved. Parking provided is adequate. Snow storage is adequate. Grading plan is adequate. Landscape plan is adequate. Plant sizes meet criteria. Meters are on building. Meets setback requirements. Other site plan issues BUILDING: Habitable Space. Maximum Height. Roof Form. Roofing Walls, Dominant Walls, Other Fascia Soffits Windows/Trim Doors/Trim Other Building Issues: 35% 5% 3% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Decidous trees should be minimum 1-1/2" Caliper Unknown location Yes 15" high stone retaining wall needs to be described in much greater detail. 3586 Sq. Ft. 29 Ft. Hip MATERIAL COLOR Asphalt Presidential Weathered Wood 1 x 8 cedar Olympic 911 Stucco Eggshell 1 x 6& 2 x 10 cedar Olympic 905 Plywood Olympic 911 1 x 6 cedar Olympic 911 1 x 6 cedar Olympic 911 Flues painted to match roof PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT July 6, 1993 Lot 69, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision Brethauer Single Family Final Design Review STAFF COMMENTS OR CONCERNS: The Planning and Zoning Commission made several recommendations at conceptual review: I. Stain colors should be lightened. The applicant has addressed this issue. 2. Leak at roof relationship. No changes have been made. 3. Look at entry roof drip line. This comment has not been addressed by the architect. 4. The caliper of trees to be 2" minimum. The architect has not addressed this comment. The Staff has further concerns with the design details of the 15' high retaining wall in back of the structure. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Table this application unless the applicant adequately addressed conceptual review comments, and the retaining wall issue. This wall will be a very prominent visual element and needs to be addressed in detail. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, \ ?Icr—Vw— Rick Pylman [• �qft [• PLANNING AND ZONING CONMSSION STAFF REPORT July 6, 1993 Lot 69, Block aridge Subdivision Brethauer Singll Fm Single Family Final Design Review PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted (✓) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date 6 3 Sue Railton, Secretary The Commission granted final design approval with the following conditions: 1. The site plan be brought back to the Commission, with site sections cut, with particular attention to the retaining wall; 2. The minimum size of the deciduous trees be 1-1/2" caliper V a I& PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT July 6. 1993 Lot 33, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Klein/Sherwood Single Family as Conceptual Design Review PROJECT TYPE: Single Family, Conceptual Design Review + ZONING: PUD Duplex COMPLIES WITH ZONING? Potential setback issue with roof overhang. SITE PLAN: Average slope of lot. 20% Max. slope of driveway. 10% Lot coverage. Less than 10% Driveway is paved. Parking provided is adequate. Snow storage is adequate. Grading plan is adequate. Landscape plan is adequate. Plant sizes meet criteria. Meters are on building. Meets setback requirements. Other site plan issues BUILDING: Habitable Space. Maximum Height. Roof Form. Roofing Walls, Dominant Walls, Other Fascia Soffits Windows/Trim Doors/Trim Other Building Issues: Unknown Yes Yes No, access needs work Need legend on plan Yes Yes, enclosed meter box Question garage overhang Access must be coordinated with Lot 34. Utility locations and cuts must be identified 2000 Sq. Ft. 31 Ft. Gable MATERIAL COLOR Asphalt Presidential Dark Brown 8" redwood Seagull Gray Stucco Off White 2 x 12 & 1 x 6 Blue Heron 1/4" Cedar Blue Heron Brickmold Blue Heron Brickmold Blue Heron Meter panels enclosed on building wall PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT July 6, 1993 Lot 33, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Klien/Sherwood Single Family Conceptual Design Review STAFF COMMENTS OR CONCERNS: Driveway construction must be coordinated with Lot 34. Grade exceeds 10% from road to property line., it should be 4% maximum. Garage roof overhang may encroach into setback. Utility line connections should be shown on site plan. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Conceptual review only. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, �- I C ycw'.X� Rick Pylman a:, r; PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT July 6, 1993 Lot 33, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Klien/Sherwood Single Family Conceptual Design Review PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action (.I/ Date 71,6117-3 Sue Railton, Secretary As this was a conceptual design review, no formal action was taken. The Commission did direct the applicant to return with the driveway for Lot 34 shown on the plans for Lot 33 as this is a shared access. Also, the Commission asked the applicant to consider the comments made about the band board and the trenching of snallow services. PLANNING A14D ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT a July 6, 1993 Lot 43/44, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Beaver Creek West Final Design Review Beaver Creek West, Phase I, is requesting a design change to the building exterior. The Association would like to change out the existing solid wood balcony railings on the balconies that face into the courtyard. The proposal is to replace the existing railings with black metal railings. The 42" high railing would consist of 1" square metal top and bottom rails and 1/2" metal pickets on 4" centers. The charge is requested to facilitate a more transparent look to the railings. Staff recommendation is for approval. Respectfully Submitted /-Ww,." Rick Pylman PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued (✓S Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) y Date ��% Q 3 Sue Railton, Secretary,� 4� & /� . The applicant indicated that the owners would be repainting the buildings at a later date. The Commission tabled this item to allow the applicant to return with an overall plan and color scheme which incorporates the railings IMN h PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT • July 6, 1993 Lot 7, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision • Balas West Final Design Review The Balas West Condominium Association is proposing to amend the south elevation of the building by enclosing existing decks and adding new decks to the building The first floor existing decks that are currently "recessed" into the building will be enclosed out to the existing roof edge and a new uncovered deck at grade will extend out 12' from the building. The similar "recessed" decks on the second floor will be treated in a similar fashion, with a new uncovered deck cantilevered out 6' from the building. All new siding, windows and deck materials will match existing materials. All new construction will be painted to match existing construction. Material samples and photographs will be presented at the meeting. Staff recommendation is for approval, assuming detail issues can be worked out at the meeting. Respectfully Submitted Rick Pylman PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued (,/f Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action (u+r Date— 716 Sue Railton, Secretary ` The Commission tabled this application to allwo the applicant to return with more detailed information. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION July 6, 1993 Lots 27/28, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Commercial Industrial Building Mountain Center Phase II Conceptual Desigi. Review Vail building Arts Association is the owner and developer of the existing commercial building located on Lots 27/28, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek. The development was constructed as a phased project with the existing building representing Phase I. A second building, virtually identical to the first is proposed to be constructed immediately to the west of the existing building. The second building will connect to the west end of the existing building to continue the existing facade. There are several issues which must be addressed as the second phase is developed. the special Review Use granted to Jerry's Automotive Repair contains a condition which requires re-evaluation at time of application of the second phase. this should be done in conjunction with the Phase II architectural review. There are numerous general commercial office and personal service outlets in the existing phase which are subject to conformance with the parking regulations. A thorough review of existing uses and their parking demand must be completed in conjunction with this review. The building architecture and colors proposed are identical to existing, so upon review of parking and site plan issues, a final approval should be relatively straight forward. Respectfully submitted, Rick Pylman C� No formal action was taken at this time. The Commission requested the applicant return in two weeks with the existing uses and their parking demands and also requested that the owner of Jerry;s Automotive be present for review of his Special Review Use, which stipulates that the Special Review Use will be reviewed at such time that Phase II comes in for approval. 0% ew' PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT M July 6. 1993 Lot 84, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision Mm Beltracchi Duplex Conceptual Design Review PROJECT TYPE: Conceptual Design Review • ZONING: PUD, Duplex COMPLIES WITH ZONING? NO, Setback issue w/parking SITE PLAN: Average slope of lot. Max. slope of driveway. Lot coverage. Driveway is paved. Parking provided is adequate. Snow storage is adequate. Grading plan is adequate. Landscape plan is adequate. Plant sizes meet criteria. Meters are on building. Meets setback requirements. Other site plan issues BUILDING: Habitable Space. Maximum Height. Roof Form. Roofing Walls, Dominant Walls, Other Fascia Soffits Windows/Trim Doors/Trim Other Building Issues: 35% Flat 10% Unknown No Yes Yes Yes, but more vertical materials at back of house would be appropriate Yes Yes No Utilizing side lot easements may minimize hillside scarring 2600 sq. ft. total 30 Ft. Gable & Hip MATERIAL COLOR Asphalt/Timberline Not Listed Hardboard Not listed Stucco 2x4/2x8 Plywood Wood/1 x 4 Metal/ 1 x 4 t. aw PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT July 6, 1993 Lot 84, Block 4 Wildridge Subdivision Beltracchi Duplex Conceptual Design Review STAFF COMMENTS OR CONCERNS: 1. Exterior parking located in front setback 2. South elevation garage wall needs some detailing. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: As a conceptual review, there is no formal recommendation. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, V,"— " l" l J Rick Pylman 4D PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT July 6, 1993 Lot 84, Block 4 Wildridge Subdivision Beltracchi Duplex Conceptual Design Review PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn //( ) Conceptual, No Action (✓f Date b 3 Sue Railton, Secretary As a conceptual design review, no action was taken at this time. The ommtissi— n�id ave comments on a parKing spaces Shown in a se ac and were also concerned with the rear elevation. 0• PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT e July 6, 1993 Lot 35, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Quiring/Pagent Duplex Color Change Final Design Review K. C. Warnke, representing the owners of the existing duplex on Lot 35, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision, is proposing a color change. The new siding color will be Gray Smoke and the fascia, soffit and garage door will be Blue Balsam. Actual color samples and photographs of the existing building will be presented at the meeting. As a color change, Staff has no formal recommendation. Respectfully Submitted Rick Pylman PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted (✓) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date 6 3 Sue Railton, Secretary / The Commission granted final design approval for the color change as submitted. [• 1• :w1 oftk r PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT July 6. 1993 ® Lot 1, Block 1, Avon Town Square Subdivision Commercial Building Conceptual Design Review PROJECT TYPE: Conceptual Design Review ZONING: TC COMPLIES WITH ZONING? NO, Parking & Setbacks SITE PLAN: Average slope of lot. Max. slope of driveway. Lot coverage. Driveway is paved. Parking provided is adequate. Snow storage is adequate. Grading plan is adequate. Landscape plan is adequate. Plant sizes meet criteria. Meters are on building. Meets setback requirements. Other site plan issues BUILDING: Habitable Space. Maximum Height. Roof Form. Roofing Walls, Dominant Walls, Other Fascia Soffits Windows/Trim Doors/Trim Other Building Issues: Not Available - Flat Not Available 24% Building - 72% Impervious Yes No, Short 5 Spaces No Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Will Require Setback Variance Shared Access and Parking Proposed 18,899 Sq. Ft. leasable, including stg. 26 Ft. Gable MATERIAL COLOR Metal Wood/Stucco .--N ,0� - PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT 4 July 6, 1993 Lot 1, Block 1 Lodge at Avon Subdivision _ Commercial Building Conceptual Design Review 40 STAFF COMMENTS OR CONCERNS: This is a very conceptual review of a commercial/retall building. Urban Design Guidelines must be consulted. Access, parking, setback, landscaping and architectural issues should be reviewed carefully. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Review and give comment. A second, more detailed conceptual review is suggested. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Rick Pylman 1• PLANNING AND ZONING CONMSSION STAFF REPORT July 6, 1993 Lot I, Block 1 Lodge at Avon Subdivision r Commercial Building ® Conceptual Design Review PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action (v� ^ NN Date 3 /-/JSue Railton, Secretary � xa-� The general consensus of the Commission was that this was a very pleasant addition and encouraged the applicant to proceed. ^ 00� PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT July 6. 1993 Lot 4, Block 5, Wildridge Subdivision Triplex, The Aspens Conceptual Design Review PROJECT TYPE: Triplex, Conceptual Design Review ZONING: PUD Triplex COMPLIES WITH ZONING? Yes SITE PLAN: Average slope of lot. 100/6- 16% Max. slope of driveway. 4% Lot cove age. 20% Drivewa} is paved. Yes Parking provided is adequate. Yes Snow storage is adequate. Yes Grading plan is adequate. Yes Landscape plan is adequate. Yes Plant sizes meet criteria. Yes Meters are on building. Yes Meets setback requirements. Yes Other site plan issues BUILDING: Habitable Space. Maximum Height. Roof Form. Roofing Walls, Dominant Walls, Other Fascia Soffits Windows/Trim Doors/Trim Other Building Issues: Good site plan and landscape plan 1475 Sq. Ft. per unit 30 Ft. Gable MATERIAL Asphalt Presidential 1 x 8 channel rustic 1x4&lx 6trim 1x4 Aluminum 1x4/1x6 Ix4/1x10 COLOR Weathered Wood P ?0�, PLANNING AND ZONING CONINUSSION STAFF REPORT July 6, 1993 Lot 4, Block 5, Wildridge Subdivision Triplex,The Aspens as Conceptual Design Review STAFF COMMENTS OR CONCERNS: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: As a conceptual review, the Staff has no formal recommendation. There are no significant issues. This is a well done project. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Rick Pylman 'y 04 o-, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT � July 6, 1993 Lot Block 5, Wildridge Subdivision Triplex, The Aspens Conceptual Design Review • PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted (`�) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date 3 Sue Railton, Secretary Although this was submitted as a concentual design review, the Commission felt it was a complete application, therefore, they granted final design approval as submitted ", 0"i, MEMO TO: William D. James, Town Manager FROM: Norman Wood, Town Engineer DATE: July 1, 1993 RE: Utility Meters and Above Ground Facilities RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve amendment to Planning and Zoning Commission Design Procedures, Rules and Regulations by the addition of the following subsection "E" to Section 6.24: E. Utility Meters and Above Ground Facilities Utility meters and/or remote readouts shall be installed on the primary structure in an accessible location that is screened from public view. Above ground incidental utility facilities such as transformers, pedestals, etc. shall be incorporated into landscape plan to minimize visual impacts. This amendment is proposed in response to the recent influx of electric :peters being installed on separate panels in highly visible locations adjacent to public streets. The Avon Municipal Code provides that Planning and Zoning Commission, Rules and Regulations and any amendments are to be submitted to the Town Council for approval by motion, with direction for adoption by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Commission approved recommending to the Town Council this amendment to Section 6.24 of the Planning and Zoning Cnmmission, Design Procedures Rules and Regulations.