Loading...
PZC Packet 100593PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT October 5, 1993 Lot 4, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Golden Eagle Service Center Final Design Review, Submittal of Conditions The Planning and Zoning Commission granted final Design Review approval, with conditions, to the Golden Eagle Service Center on July 6, 1993. The conditions are as follows: 1. Roofing product be textured and other than black, with the recommendation of the bluelgray. 2. T&G cedar siding be used and brought back for approval. 3. Revised elevations with a roof enclosure over the trash. 4. Cut sheet of lights and revised plan. 5. The sign program be presented at a later date. The applicant has submitted revised drawings which address the conditions of approval and will present lighting, roofing material, siding material and the roof over the trash enclosure. As a submittal of previous conditions, Staff has no fon.nal recommendations. Respectfully submitted, Mary Holden Town Planner PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT' October 5, 1993 Lot 4, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Golden Eagle Service Center Final Design Review, Submittal of Conditions PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions (✓) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date 492?�S Sue Railton, Secretary �Z� The Commission aranted anproval to the T & , siding as presented, approved the trash enclosure with the condition that some type of wood clad door be applied to the enclosure, and approved the lighting clan as presented with the following conditions: 1. The type of lamp be high pressure sodium in all exterior fixtures. 2. The ytpe of C Fixtures attached to the building have no more than 50 watts and the type K fixtures, bollard fixtures, have a 70 watt Maximum. arm PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT October 5, 1993 Lot 98.. Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Sterling Duplex Final Design Review - Plan Modification PROJECT TYPE: Duplex ZONING: PUD, Duplex COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES INTRODUCTION: The applicant, Sam Sterling, is requesting various changes to the elevations of his proposed duplex. He received final design review approval at the May 18,1993 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting. The originally approved plans and the proposed changes will be available at the Planning and Zoning Meeting on October 5, 1993. BUILDING CHANGES: West Elevation: • Changing one window from twin pane glass to single pane glass. East Elevation: • Western second story deck extended to cover first story door. • Eastern second story deck moved from centered position to extend over other first story door. South Elevation: • Second story window changed from twin pane glass to single pane glass. • Windows under deck increased and made single pane instead of twin pane. • Window reduced in size on second level, overlooking the deck. • Windows changed to doors under deck and on second level. North Elevation: • No changes. STAFF COMMENTS OR CONCERNS: Staffs main concern with this request are the various window styles being proposed for each elevation as a result of the elimination of the mullions on several windows. The design guidelines suggest divisions of windows by mullions and muntins to add character and give scale to the building. Another concern deals with the issue of the deck placements. The original elevations showed a balance between the windows,decks and the gabled roof forms. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT October 5, 1993 Lot 98, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Sterling Duplex Design Review Plan Modification STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the requested changes to the building elevations with the following condition: 1. That all revised windows retain the the previously approved trim and mullion detail. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Mary Holden Town Planner PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT October 5, 1993 Lot 98, Block I Wildridge Subdivision Sterling Duplex Design Review Plan Modification PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions (V� Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) DateSue Railton, Secretary=� The Commission granted approval for the requested changes to the west elevation, including a mid-sized double casement kitchen window, and approved the deck changes, with the obligation that the applicant come up with a waterproofinq solution over the entry. The Commission denied the south elevation window changes and these were not included in the above approval. Aluminum, steel, painted wood, or clad wood windows are allowable. Prohibitions include: mirrored glass, snap -in muntlns, glass curtain walls, and other assem- blies which are clearly out of character with the Town Core. 6. Doors and Entryways Public Doors and entry ways within The Town should be a combination of glass and metal or wood, or solid s� wood. All -glass or all -metal doors are discouraged. Doors should be used to establish interest, character, and s� 35 U 9 Particular attention must be paid to the location of ex- 2 haust vents from commercial kitchens which can emit unpleasant odors and noise. These vents must meet or ¢a exceed local codes and are subject to modification and/or should be clustered and screened within chimney -like enclosures. 5. Windows Chimneys must be carefully located to avoid fumigation of adjacent buildings and ground areas. Generally they should be as high as possible and on the upwind side of the roof for best results. Aluminum, steel, painted wood, or clad wood windows are allowable. Prohibitions include: mirrored glass, snap -in muntlns, glass curtain walls, and other assem- blies which are clearly out of character with the Town Core. 6. Doors and Entryways Public Doors and entry ways within The Town should be a combination of glass and metal or wood, or solid s� wood. All -glass or all -metal doors are discouraged. Doors should be used to establish interest, character, and s� 35 U 9 Particular attention must be paid to the location of ex- 2 haust vents from commercial kitchens which can emit unpleasant odors and noise. These vents must meet or ¢a exceed local codes and are subject to modification and/or relocation at the request of the Town of Avon if the system does not perform adequately. 5. Windows Windows must serve many purposes in the design of buildings. They establish patterns, rhythms, and scale on the exterior walls, they respond to uses and needs on the interior, and they can be recognizable indications of what goes on behind them. They provide passive solar heating for interior spaces and also contribute to heat loss from within. Variety in the use of windows is en- couraged within certain limits. Commercial spaces must have large areas of glass opening onto public pathways, i� streets, or sidewalks (suggested goal is 75% glass). Residences, hotels, and other private uses should have .� more limited use of glass. In boli: cases, large uninter- rupted areas of glass are discouraged. Division of win- dows by mullions and muntins adds character and gives scale to the building. Aluminum, steel, painted wood, or clad wood windows are allowable. Prohibitions include: mirrored glass, snap -in muntlns, glass curtain walls, and other assem- blies which are clearly out of character with the Town Core. 6. Doors and Entryways Public Doors and entry ways within The Town should be a combination of glass and metal or wood, or solid s� wood. All -glass or all -metal doors are discouraged. Doors should be used to establish interest, character, and s� 35 U 9 '-75 % Glass a! Felwl Arc Alfe 2 iii i l �• / / '-75 % Glass a! Felwl Arc Alfe ` \ T � w.�w� n «.��� - _ � � .. n �� / t � '. .. I i :.. _. ,. . ; . .. i 9 - .. - 7 C . ; . - .. i . 0 i 7 7 Y ' r PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT October 5, 1993 Lot 4, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Ridgeline Condominium Landscaping Plan Modification PROJECT TYPE: Multifamily ZONING: PUD, Multifamily COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES INTRODUCTION: Ridgeline Condominiums received final De�:bn Review approval on September 7, 1990. The applicants, Mr. Wahl and Mr. Degen, are requesting a modification to their landscape plan to allow for native grass in place of all the sod areas. STAFF COMMENTS AND CONCERNS: Our main concern with this request addresses the question of how appropriate it is to have just native grass in this high density area when the majority of the surrounding projects have sodded yards. Native grass is appropriate in certain locations, since it is in keeping with the natural environment. Sodded yards are also appropriate as play and outside use areas in multi -family projects. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission approve this application to allow native grasses in lieu of sod with the following condition: 1. That sod be retained in the rear of the buildings as useable lawn areas and that it be reflected on the site/landscaping plan. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action �Respectfully submitted, Hol en 44 ` kl— Mary PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STikFF REPORT October 5, 1993 Lot 4, Block t Wildridge Subdivision Ridgeline Condos Landscape Plan Modification PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( Withdrawn .� ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date 6u 19f3 Sue Railton, Secretary The Commission denied the request to change the approved sod area to a seeded native grass. A�► PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT October 5, 1993 Lot 14, Block 1, Eaglebend Subdivision • Duplex Residence for Siebert Investments Final Design Review Modifications ■ 4ft PROJECT TYPE: Duplex ZONING: PUD COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES INTRODUCTION: This residence received final Design Review approval on January 5, 1993. John Railton, the agent representing the owner, has submitted an application requesting various changes that include: • a one story addition, which will consist of one bedroom and bath to be located on the northeast portion of the residence; • location change of driveway entrance; and • changing the siding and roofing materials from log siding and metal roofing to cedar lap siding and cedar shake shingles. SITE PLAN: The building footprint has changed by extending the northeast portion of the building east. The original garage location is now the addition with the garage further east. The driveway location has moved from the northern comer of the lot to the southern comer of the lot. The change is to accommodate the new location of the garage. BUILDING CHANGES: Due to the addition of the bedroom and bath the north, east and west elevation have changed as follows:. • The east elevation includes two, one car garage doors and a residential door. • The west elevation will have one door and a set of triple pane windows. • On the north elevation, the original garage doors will be replaced with siding and a window. The applicant is further requesting a change in materials. The request is to have cedar lap siding with cedar shake roof shingles instead of the approved log facade with a metal roof. PLANNING AND ZONING CONA iON STAFF REPORT October 5, 1993 Lot 14, Block 1, Eaglebend Subd' evion Residence for Siebert Investments Final Design Review Modification STAFF COMMENTS AND CONCERNS The driveway relocation is appropriate to allow access into the revised garage location, but must be built to Town standards, which includes having a 4% sloped driveway for 20 feet from the driveway cut extending back onto the property. . In this location there is a meter pedestal which should be •emoved and the meters placed on the buildings (see conditions of approval). STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Commission approve this request with the attached conditions: 1. The slope of the driveway, where it meets the right-of-way and 20 feet onto the property, shall be no more than 4%. 2. The meter pedestal shall be removed for the front of residences and placed on the buildings. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Mary Holden Town Planner �w PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT October 5, 1993 Lot 14, Block 1, Eaglebend Subdivision Residence for Siebert Investments Final Design Review Modification PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( " j Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date 06/S 19? 3 Sue Railton, Secretary4 �/ — Since there was not a representative present to answer Commission questions the Commission tabled this item until the October 19, 1993 meeting