Loading...
PZC Packet 120793,. ......:..:. ....-: ., r.- ;:t.... +, -w-: ,.t :^ ..... ,,wx.. , .. N..::.i ,..r .-. ., a,.�.;v .,- _ - a;.:.. -« .xr-;FS."' ."r."-TS".'�. _ _ _ _ `� _ _ _ _ — _ _ k... _ _— _ — _— r-. _ ,>n.-« P-::... ..r-a..- �:«_<. :+,. �.s-... .. ..K..h• -... re.+ in. .Z� ,.... ✓� ra:.,rr .r .-:?.r'...r .,. ,.. . ,'.. ..x..,• , t h, p .A t'.::¢ .,.vi .xn „¢ .z.;::;w as .... r . ... .. *,-,. ., v. R.. ., . ,. . .,.. ... . + ,, v. J +..K: -i Yw-. ,c"xilb+"N.... vr. ...... x.-x ,_,i ..M.. ri'.:. .t �X. 4. KAf;-:' '4.e'^t'r"r" i+N, rMJ-.ara `M:^_. lF I.04 ++,+'1 ..d..cSeE x: zw, fi'H+t wr a �y v -. .o- Y^ :. .. _ e .^a.Yw::ra .. 4 .. " r.K . " i .g:. .,s,rs.nv i :.. 11i'9kr %a. n E. x , :%', r{ a r`� wa*<t,4k,�^t •., r ..,udt ."5 . 'i`"'g�'N':�3?.. -.,.. -'., .£"Y' . YP e ian : , , .. .. . S :5a" ......: .. „. a .w i .: < .. wir : . , .. ^. hII, .. .. . .. w••. •.y :41 eNY I NNIW ' IN :N I�.. , T "ol MdML I jdm� omm NUT OA NG & ZONING C ISSION MI ES PL FICHE, rr zz ic r NOVEMB 1993 END ER 7 ( . . : 91 tg� rw START 16 1993 Eli I NOVEMBEP.,w -v.:: .;.-:"`..,..Y; .a;Np%;,,.. ., ra r .41 jr; ga . r. {t e ?'1 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT December 7, 1993 Lot 1-2, The Lodge at Avon Subdivision Avon Town Square Special Review Use - Off -Site Parking PROJECT TYPE: Commercial ZONING: Town Center COMPLIES WITH ZONING? No, Parking Requires Special Review Use INTRODUCTION: Mr. A] Williams, the applicant has submitted an application for a retail/commercial building of approximately 25,783 gross square feet. The building will be three levels (which includes a basement level). The Commission reviewed and commented on the Conceptual Design on November 16, 1993. The project requires a total of 75 off-street parking spaces. The applicant is requesting that 30 of the 75 spaces be provided off-site. Off-site parking for a commercial nse must be within 300 feet of the building. Establishment of off-site parking shall be a special review use. If approved, off-site parking shall be by deed or lease filed and recorded with Eagle County. Any deed or lease must be perpetual. Parking_SummM: Garden Level Commercial Space Main Level Retail/Office Space Second Level Office Space 15% Reduction 5,960 sq ft (4/1000) 24 spa, -.es 7,271 sq ft (5.5/1000) 40 spaces 5.943 sq ft (4/1000) 24 spaces 12,756 sq ft 88 spaces 13 spaces 75 spaces Up to 401/o of the parking requirement may be provided off-site. Thirty (30) off-site spaces could be allowed for the development.. STAFF COMMENTS: Before acting on a special review use application, the Commission shall consider the following criteria when evaluating an application: A. Whether the proposed use otherwise complies with all requirements imposed by the zoning code. COMMENT: The proposed land use (retail/office) conforms with the Zoning Code. M •• PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF RI'rORT om December 7. 1993 Lot I-2, The Lodge at Avon Subdivision e Avon Town Square Special Review Use - Off -Site Parking B. Whether the proposed use is in conformance with the Town Comprehensive Plan. WIM COMMENT: The proposed land use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. C. Whether the proposed use is compatible with adjacent uses. COMMENT: The proposed land use is compatible with adjacent existing and proposed uses. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommendation is for approval of the specia! review use to allow 30 off-site parking spaces on Lot 2, The lodge at Avon Subdivision. Staff feels that the request moets the required criteria necessary for approval, with the following condition: 1. That a off-site parking easement be recorded on Lot ?, i he Lodge at Avon Subdivision. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Open Public Hearing 4. Close Public Hearing 5. Commission Review 6. Commission Action Respectfully submits d, l_ Stev Amsbaugh Director of Community Development 9•• a PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF RETORT December 7, 1993 ® Lot 1-2, The Lodge at Avon Subdivision Avon Town Square Special Review Use - Off -Site Parking I� Cm PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions (✓j Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date /993 Sue Railton, Secretary The Commission Commission approved Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution 93-11, granting approval of the Special Review Use Permit for off-site parking for Lots 1 and 2, Lodge at Avon Subdivision ig r, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT December 7, 1993 Lot 1-2, The Lodge at Avon Subdivi--ion Avon Town Square Variance - Front Yard Setback PROJECT TYPE: Commercial ZONING: Town Center COMPLIES WITH PONING? No, Requires a Variance to Front Yard Setback Requirements INTRODUCTION: Mr. Al Williams, the applicant has submitted an application for the development of a retail/commercial building of approximately 25,783 gross square feet on Lot 1, The Lodge at Avon Subdivision. The building will be three levels (which includes a basement level). The Commission reviewed and commented on the Conceptual Design on November 16, 1993. REQUEST: The applicant is requesting relief from the 25 foot front yard setback requirement in order to locate a trash dumpster enclosure adjacent and attached to the west end of the proposed building. The request is to allow the enclosure to be placed six (6) feet into the 25' frontyard setback. Because of grade changes, the enclosure wall will be approximately 42" in height. The enclosure will be fl-ushed with stucco and painted to match the building. Landscaping is proposed to further screen the trash enclosure in this location. An alternate, conforming, location exists in a landscape island just west of the loading zone. However, the topography would require the enclosure to be six feet in height and separated from the building. This location would also displace proposed landscaping in this area. STAFF COMMENTS: Before acting on a variance application, the Commission shall consider the following factors with respect to the requested variance: Section 17.36.40, Approval Criteria: A. The relationship of the requested variance to existing and potential uses and structures in the vicinity. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF RETORT December 7, 1993 Lot 1-2, The Lodge at Avon Subdivision Avon Town Square Variance - Front Yard Setback Comment. The encroachment would not effect any existing structures in the vicinity. Staff feels that there is an insignificant impact on the relationship of the requested variance to future structures in the vicinity. B. The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibly and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity. Comment. The degree of relief is insignificant to the present and future use of this or adjacent properties. Staff feels that denial of the requested variance in order to achieve uniformity of treatment would be an unnecessary and unreasonable hardship to place on the applicant. C. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety. Comment. The requested six foot front yard setback variance would not effect traffic safety, utility locations, pedestrian circulation or public safety. D. Such other factors and criteria as the Commission deems applicable to the requested variance. Comment. Staff has not identified any other factors for the Commission to consider. Other conforming locations may be more visible to pedestrians. FINDINGS REQUIRED: The Planning and Zoning Commission shall make the following findings before granting a variance: A. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties in the vicinity. B. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. C. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons: i. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title; ii. There are exceptional or extrao-dinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the vicinity; r* PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF RErORT I December 7. 1993 Lot 1-2, The Lodge at Avon Subdivision Avon Town Square Variance - Front Yard Setback iii. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the vicinity. STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND FINDINGS: Staff recommendation is for approval of the front yard setback variance -.;quest. Staff feels that the request meets the required criteria necessary for approval. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Open Public Hearing 4. Close Public Hearing 5. Commission Review 6. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Steve Amsbaug Director of Community Development 0*4 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF RETORT December 7, 1993 Lot 1-2, The Lodge at Avon Subdivision Avon Town Square Variance - Front Yard Setback PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted (✓) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date ,lea IU3 Sue Railton, Secretary The Commission approved Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution 93-12, granting approval for the requested front yard setback variance for Avon Town Square, Lot 1, The Lodge At Avon Subdivision PLANNING AND 'ZONING COMMISSION STAFF RETORT December 7, 1993 Lot 1-2, The Lodge at Avon Subdivision Avon Town Square Final Design Review PROJECT TYPE: Commercial ZONING: Town Center COMPLIES WITH ZONING? Yes INTRODUCTION: Mr. Al Williams, the applicant has submitted an application for Final Design Review of a retail/commercial building of approximately 25,783 gross square feet. The building will be three levels (which includes a basement level). The Commission reviewed and commented on the Conceptual Design on November 16, 1993. Development Requirements for Town Center District: 1. Allowed uses include retail shops, professional offices, restaurants,etc. 2. Minimum lot size, 30,000 sq ft. 3. Maximum building height, 80 feet. 4. Minimum building setbacks are 25' front, 10' rear and 7.5' each side. 5. Maximum site coverage is 50% (building footprint). 6. Minimum landscape area is 20% (does not include sidewalks). 7. Parking standards are 4/1000 for retail and 3/1000 for office uses. 8. Design Guidelines - Streetscape Standards. Summary of the Development Proposal: • Proposed uses include retail and office condominium spaces. The basement level will include office space and assigned storage spaces for first and second floor businesses. • Lot size is currently 33,000 sq ft; however a lot he adjustment is proposed to add 12 feet to the south property line. The revised lot size will be 37,269 sq ft. An amended Final Plat will be needed to change the lot area.. • Building height is 37 feet. • Building setbacks are dimensioned at 25' for front and 7.5' for the east sideyard. A proposed trash enclosure is proposed to extend 6 feet into the front yard setback. A variance will be required. • Building coverage is indicated at 23%. • Minimum landscape area of 20% is required. In addition, applicant will be _squired to develop the area adjacent to Benchmark Road to conform to the Town's Streetscape Standards. • In order to achieve the required parking, the applicant has shown parking spaces on adjacent Lot 2. This is a Special Review Use. ai PLANNING AND LONING COMMiFO-ION STAFF REPORT December 7, 1993 Lot 1-2, The Lodge at Avon Subdivis ® Avon Town Square Final Design Review a Accent columns will be Dark Warm Grey. Everglade Green painted metal railings are proposed. pJ■ SIGN FROGRAM: Building Identification Signage The Program calls out three building identification signs and one entryway sign at the driveway entrance. These signs will have black lettering, 15' in height. Tenant Signage Fourteen tennant signs are proposed. Sign locations are shown on proposed building elevations. A tenant sign schedule is provided in Exhibit 6, attached. These signs will be reverse pan channel letters, blue in color. Total copy may be 24" in height. Each tenant will have two signs, one on the north and one on the south. Typestyles and logos will be up to tennant selection. Garden level signage will be limited to 7.5 sq R , to be located within the garden level walkway. Sign background will be similar in color to the building body color. Text and logos will be Blue. Second level tennants are not allowed exterior or windor signage. A tennant directory will be placed by the south building entrance to direct persons to the upper floor. Temproary banners will be allowed during the manafacturing of .he permanent signage. No other temporary mt.,- be used. 0 PLANNING AND 'ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT December 7, 1993 Lot 1-2, The Lodge at Avon Subdivision Avon Town Square Final Design Review Identified Approvals Staff has identified the following land use approvals as necessary to implement this project: I. Final Design Approval 2. Special Review Use Permit - Off -Site Parking 3. Final Plat Amendment - Lot line revision 4. Front Yard Setback Variance 5. Condominium Final Plat 6. Encroachment Permit - CDOT SITE PLAN: A grading, drainage and landscape plan has been submitted for the Commissions review. On-site grading and drainage has been reviewed by the Town Engineer and meets the technical requirements. Generally, the proposed building has frontage on Benchmark Road, just west of Avon Road. Access to the development would be from a sharred driveway from Benchmark Road. Parking is proposed on the south side of the building. Fourty-five spaces are proposed on-site. Thirty spaces are porposed on adjacent Lot 2 Landscaping will include streetscape improvements along Benchmark Road, plant beds and sod on the north and west side of the building, garden level planter boxes along the south side of the building and planter islands within the parking lot. Sculpture pedestals are proposed in seven locations. The trash dumpster will be screened by a wall extending west from the building. The loading zone and dumpster will be approximately 4 feet below existing grade. Handicap parking and ramps are proposed at the east and west end of the building. The east ramp is proposed within the 7.5 foot sideyard setback. BUILDING: The proposed building footprint is 8600 square feet and will be approximately 37 feet in height. The building will have a hip roof form with a prominent central dormer and a tower on the east end. A standing sear,, metal roof material is proposed in Fawn Grey. Roof facia will be Everglade Green. Siding will generally consist of a Light Warm Grey dryvit finish with Taupe colored window systems. The proposed sign band above the first floor will be Light Warm Grey. PLANNING AND LONING COMMISSION STAFF RETORT December 7, 1993 Lot 1-2, The Lodge at Avon Subdivision Avon Town Square Final Design Review STAFF COMMENTS: Staffhas reviewed the proposal and the project appears to be in general conformance with the Codes and Regulations of the Town of Avon. Approval of a front yard setback variance and a Special Review Use permit for off-site parking are required. Final Design Review The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the final design of this project: Conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable regulations of the Town. Comment: This proposal is in conformance with Town codes (Variance and Special Review Use approval also required). The suitability of the improvement, including type and quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located. Comment: The type and quality of proposed building materials and landscape materials is consistent with Town guidelim-s. The compatibility of the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties. Comment: This is a flat development site within the Town core. The compatibility of the proposed improvements with site topography. Comment: The proposed building and driveway have been designed to cause minimum impact upon the topography. The visual appearance of any proposed improvement as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. Comment: The applicant has designed the proposal utilizing the Town's Design Guidelines for the Town Core. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. Comment: The proposal meets the objective of this guideline. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF RE:rORT December 7, 1993 Lot 1-2, The Lodge at Avon Subdivision Avon Town Square Final Design Review Comment: The proposal is in conformance with the goals, policies and programs for the Town of Avon. Sign Program "Sign Guidelines" and Review Criteria from the Sign Code. Section 15.28 060 Sign Design Guidelines A. Harmonious with Town Scale. Sign location, configuration, design, materials, and colors should be harmonious with the existing signs on the structure, with the neighborhood, and with the townscape. B. Harmonious with Building Scale. the sign should be harmonious with the building scale, and should not visually dominate ,'re structure to which it belongs or call undue attention to itself. C. Materials. Quality sign materials, including anodized metal; routed or sandblasted wood, such as rough cedar or redwood; interior -lit, individual plexiglass - faced letters; or three dimensional individual letters with or without indirect lighting, are encouraged. Sign materials, such as printed plywood, interior -lit box --type plastic, and paper or vinyl stick -on window signs are discouraged, but may be approved, however, if determined appropriate to the location, at the sole discretion of the Commission. D. Architectural Harmony. The sign and its supporting structure should be in harmony architecturally, and in harmony in color with the surrounding structures. E. Landscaping. Landscaping is required for all free-standing signs, and should be designed to enhance the signage and surrounding building landscaping. F. Reflective Surfaces. Reflective surfaces are not allowed. G. Lighting. Lighting should be of no greater wattage than is necessary to make the sign visible at night, and should not reflect unnecessarily onto adjacent properties. Lighting sources, except neon tubing, should not be directly visible to passing pedestrians or vehicles, and should be concealed in such a manner that direct light does not shine in a disturbing manner. H. Location. On multi -story buildings, individual business signs shall generally be limited to the ground level. PLANNING AND CONING COMMISSION STAFF RErORT December 7, 1993 Lot 1-2, The Lodge at Avon Subdivision Avon Town Square Final Design Review Section 15.28.070 - Sign Design Review Criteria In addition to the sign Design Guidelines fisted above, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall also consider the following criteria while reviewing proposed sign designs: A. The suitability of the improvement, including materials with which the sign is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located: Comment: The proposed Sign Program is consistent with the Town's Sign Design Guidelines. B. The nature of adjacent and neighboring improvements: Comment: The sign materials are consistent with allowed signs on adjacent and neighboring buildings. C. The quality of the materials to be utilized in any proposed improvement: Comment: The quality of the proposed sign materials are acceptable. D. The visual impact of any proposed improvement as viewed from any adjacent or neighboring property: Comment: The visual impact of these proposed improvements will be consistent with existing area sirs. E. The objective that no improvement will be so similar or dissimilar to other signs in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic, will be impaired: Comment: Staff feels that consistent sign locations provide clarity while each sign/logo will provide diversity. F. Whether the type, height, size, and/or quant- y of signs generally complies with the sign code and appear to be appropriate for the project: Comment: The type, size and location of the proposed signs generally comply with the Sign Code. G. Whether the sign is primarily oriented to vehicular or pedestrian traffic, and whether the sign is appropriate for the determined orientation. Comment: These signs a. a primarily oriented toward vehicular traffic. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF RErORT December 7, 1993 Lot 1-2, The Lodge at Avon Subdivision Avon Town Square Final Design Review STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this Final Design Review and Sign Program for Lot 1/2, Lodge at Avon, subject to the following conditions: 1. That street and streetscape improvements for the Benchmark Road frontage, extending to Avon Road, be provided by the applicant. These improvements must be reviewed and approved by the Town Engineer prior to issuance of a Building Permit. 2. Final drainage, gnAing, driveway design and culverts be approved by the Town Engineer prior to issuance of a Building Permit. 3. The building colors be indicated on the approved Final Design Review plans. 4. The dumpster gate be relocated to allow for a 35' loading dock area. 5. All streetscape lighting and furniture conform to Town specifications. 6. A landscape irrigation system by provided. 7. Landscape islands in the parking lot include two additional trees each. 8. The sculpture pedestal be eliminated in the landscape island at the west end of the site. 9. The handicap ramp located in the east sideyard setback be relocated. 10. The entry drive sign be relocated to allow for future sidewalk improvements. 11. The streetscape improvements be extended on Lot 2 to the westerly end of the proposed off-site parkir,�. 12. First level tenant signage shall not exceed 20 sq ft per commercial tenant. 13. True PMS color for signage be included in the Sign Program. 14. Approval of technical corrections identified by Staff. ACTION: 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfu ly submitted #1 Stev sbaugh Director of Community Development PLANNING AND LONING COMMISSION STAFF RErORT t o December 7, 1993 Lot T The Lodge at Avon Subdivision an Town Square Final Design Review PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions (4 Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date_ -!i /4V-3 Sue Railton, Secretary A SEE ATTACHED SHEET o• '�"9 Lot 1, Lodoe At ,Avon Subdivision, Avon Town Square, Ftnal Design Review MimThe Commission granted final design approval with the following conditions: r 1. The street and streetscape improvements on Benchmark °oad frotnage be extended to Avon Roed, and be provided by the applicant. Those basically are the lighting pedestals and the sidewalks. These improvements must be reviewed and approved by the Town Engineer prior to permit issuance. 2. Final drainage, grading and driievay and culvert be approved by the Town Engineer prior to building permit issuance. 3. The building colors be indicated on the approved design plans. 4. The dumpster gate be relocated back toward the dumnster to allow for the complete use of the 35' loading dock. 5. All streetscape lighting and furniture conform to Town specifications as set forth in the Town Guidelines. 6. A landscape irrigation system be provided. 7. The entry drive sign be relocated to allow for future sidevalk improvenents. S. The streetscape imnrove^ient he extended on Lot 2 to the westerlu end of the proposed off-site parking. Q. The roof color and cap flashings come back to the Commission for approval. 10. The tenant sign program be brought back to the Commission for approval. 11. True PMS color for signage be included in the sign pron.ram. o 12. The following items be approved by Staff: Additional landscaping in the landscape islands in the parking lot. The sculpture pedestal be eliminated in the landscape island at the vest end of the site. �W_j® The handicap ramp located in the east sideyard setback be relocated or redesigned. moll® Approval of technical corrections identified by Staff. c==Sl�NJ, COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PROGRAM-� , ; 1 " 9 AVON TOWN SQUARE'S 1 BENCHMARK RD. AVON, COLORADO NOVEMBER, 1993 N -V z 3 1993 0,11 d,040 DEVEI OPOiENT THE AVON TOWN SQUARE COMPLEX WILL CONSIST OF TWO BUILDINGS HAVING A MOMD USE OF RETAIL AND COMMERCIAL TENANTS. PHASE ONE, A TWO STORY BUILDING, IS COVERED WITHIN THIS SIGN PROPOSAL. THE INTENT IS TO PROVIDE A POSITIVE DEVELOPMENT TO THE COMMERCIAL CORE OF AVON. IN KEEPING WITH THIS GOAL, ALL DESIGNS, MATERIALS, WORKMANSHIP, AND MAINTENANCE WILL BE OF A FIRST CLASS NATURE. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS INTENT THE COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PROGRAM SHALL: 1. IDENTIFY THE DEVELOPMENT FROM ADJACENT STREETS TO VEHICULAR TRAFFIC. 2. IDENTIFY THE GROUND FLOOR TENANTS AND SERVICES FROM "STREETSIDE" ON THE NORTH AND EAST, AND "MALLSIDE" FROM THE SOUTH AND WEST. 3. MENTIFY TO PEDESTRIANS AND VEHICULAR TRAFFIC THE SITE CIRCULATION, BUILDING ENTRANCES AND PARKING LOCATIONS. 4. IDENTIFY GROUND FLOOR TENANTS AND GARDEN LEVEL TENANTS AS INDICATED. A. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: I. ALL TENANTS AND OWNERS WILL SUBMIT TO THE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ALL PROPOSED SIGNAGE. WRITTEN APPROVAL IS NEEDED PRIOR TO SUBMISSION TO THE TOWN OF AVON. 2. ALL IMPROVEMENTS WILL BE MAINTAINED BY THE CONDOMINIUM OWNER, AND UPON VACATING BY A TENANT, THE EXISTING SIGNAGE WILL BE REMOVED AND ALL HOLES AND DISCOLORATION WILL BE PROMPTLY AND PROFESSIONALLY REPAIRED, (BY THE CONDOMINIUM OWNER). TIM CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIAT,ON WILL HAVE THE RIGHT TO PERFORM SUCH WORK, IF NOT DONE BY THE CONDOMINIUM OWNER IN A TIMELY OR PROFESSIONAL MANNER, AND LIEN THE PROPERTY FOR ALL COSTS INCURRED. 3. ALL WORKMANSHIP AND SPECIFICATIONS WILL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS. 4. THE COST OF OBTAINING PERMITS AND APPROVALS WILL BE THAT OF THE CONDOMINIUM OWNER 5. ALL FIRST FLOOR OCCUPANTS ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE SIGNAGE, AND THAT SIGNAGE IS TO BE IN CONFORMITY WITH THE APPROVED SIGN PLAN. HIGHTECHSIGNS P.O.Box2688 Production Center Aspen& Vail, CO81658 910 Nottingham Road Glenwood Sprgs. 303.949.4565 Suite S.2 303.945.6695 FAX9494670 Avon, CO 81620 1) B. SIGNAGE SPECIFICATION 1. BUILDING IDENTIFICATION THE BUILDING IDENTIFICATION LOCATIONS ARE THE EAST SIDE OF THE TOWER THE NORTH AND SOUTH SIDES OF THE ENTRY ARCHES, AND ON THE NORTH WEST BUILDING CORNER AS SHOWN IN EXHIBITS 1, 2 AND 3, (LOCATIONS B-1, B-2, B-3 AND B-4). THESE SIGNS SHALL CONSIST OF INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED REVERSE PAN CHANNEL LETTERS FOR THE TOWER, AND PAINTED METAL LETTERS, STUD MOUNTED OVER THE ARCHES, ALL TO BE BLACK IN COLOR. THE NORTH, SOUTH AND NORTH WEST LETTERS WILL BE EXTERNALLY ILLUMINATED. SIZES ARE AS INDICATED IN EXHIBITS 4 & 5. 2. FIRST FLOOR TENANT SIGNAGE TENANT IDENTIFICATION WILL BE IN THE AREAS INDICATED ON EXHIBITS 2 AND 3. THESE SIGNS WILL BE REVERSE PAN CHANNEL. LETTERS, BLUE IN COLOR (PMS -), AND MAY CONSIST OF TEXT AND LOGOS, WITH THE LOGOS COMPRISING A MAXIMUM OF 35% OF THE ACTUAL SIGNAGE. MAXIMUM DIGHT SHALL BE 32", AND MAXIMUM LENGTH SHALL BE 60% OF THE SPACE FRONTAGE. (SEE EXHIBIT 6). MAXIMUM LETTER HEIGHT FOR A SINGLE LINE OF TYPE SHALL BE 20". A MAXIMUM OF TWO LINES OF COPY SHALL BE ALLOWED, IN WHICH CASE A MINIMUM HEIGHT SHALL BE 8", AND A MAXIMUM SHALL BE 16" PER LINE. THE TOTAL COPY MAY BE A TOTAL OF 24 " FOR TWO LINES OF COPY (WITHOUT COUNTING SPACE BETWEEN THE LINES). SEE EXHIBIT 6 FOR ADDITIONAL SPECIFICATIONS. THE TEXT PORTION MAY CONSIST OF A BUSINESS NAME AND THE NATURE OF THE BUSINESS. THE BUSINESS NAME SHALL BE 50% OF THE SIGN SQUARE FOOTAGE, OR GREATER. THE NATURE OF THE BUSINESS PORTION MAY BE ILLUMINATED, OR NOT, AT THE OPTION OF THE BUSINESS. IF NOT ILLUMINATED, THE TEXT SHALL BE PAINTED METAL LETTERS, WITH PMS BLUE_ STUD MOUNTED, 1/2" OFF THE WALL. A TENANT WILL HAVE TWO SIGNS (ONE ON THE NORTH AND ONE ON THE SOUTH ELEVATION) IF THEIR SPACE GOES TO EACH ELEVATION. IF A TENANT SPACE 1S SUBDIVIDED, THE PROPORTIONAL FRONTAGE OF LINEAL FOOTAGE WILL BE ALLOWED FOR THAT TENANT. (I.E. 50% OF THE FRONTAGE WILL PERMIT 5001. OF THE SQUARE FOOTAGE, BUT THE 60% WIDTH RULE WILL APPLY TO THE REDUCED FRONTAGE.) TYPESTYLES AND LOGOS SHALL BE UP TO TENANT SELECTION, BUT REQUIRE WRITTEN CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION APPROVAL IS REQUIRED TO INSURE COMPATIBILITY OF SUCH SIGNAGE WITH THE FIRST CLASS IMAGE THAT THE AVON TOWN SQUARE COMPLEX IS MAINTAINING. IF A GROUND FLOOR BUSINESS OCCUPIES MORE THEN ONE SPACE, THAT TENANT CAN USE THE C OMBINED FOOTAGE ALLOWANCE FOR THE SPACE USED. - ALL WINDOW SIGNAGE SHALL CONFORM TO THE THEN CURRENT TOWN OF AVON PERMITTED SIGNAGE. COLORS, SIZE AND PLACEMENT SHALL FIRST REQUIRE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION TO INSURE COMPATIBILITY OF SUCH SIGNAGE WITH THE FIRST CLASS IMAGE THAT TILE AVON TOWN SQUARE COMPLEX IS MAINTAINING. 3. GARDEN LEVEL SIGNAGE EACH TENANT ON THE GARDEN LEVEL WILL HAVE A N A30 MW SIGNAGE ALLOWANCE OF 7.5 SQ FEET, WITH PLACEMENT AS SHOWN IN EXHIBIT 7 THESE SIGNS MAY BE EXTERNALLY ILLUMINATED BY LIGHTING SHOWN IN THIS EXHIBIT. MATERIAL FOR THE SIGN SHALL BE SAND BLASTED REDWOOD OR SIGN FOAM, WITH THE BACKGROUND TO BE TAN COLOR SIMILAR TO THE BUILDING, AND TEXT AND LOGO TO BE BLUE (PMS __). TENANTS CAN UTILIZE ANY COMBINATION OF LOGO AND TEXT WITH THE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION. IF A GARDEN LEVEL TENANT OCCUPIES MORE THAN ONE SP ::E, THEY SHALL BE ALLOWED THE SIGNAGE FOR EACH SPACE IN THAT SPACE'S SIGN AREA SHOWN IN EXHIBIT 3, G -I- G7. 4. SECOND LEVEL TENANTS SECOND LEVEL TENANTS ARE NOT PERMITTED EXTERIOR OR WINDOW SIGNAGE. 5. BUILDING DIRECTORY A TENANT DIRECTORY SHALL BE PLACED IN THE LOCATION SHOWN IN EXHIBIT 8 (BY THE SOUTH BUILDING ENTRANCE). THE PR %4ARY PURPOSE SHALL BE TO DIRECT PERSONS TO THE UPPER AND GARDEN LEVEL TENANTS. THE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION SHALL DETERMINE LISTING AND SIZES WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED SIGNAGE AREA. EXHIBIT 9 SHOWS THE DIRECTORY LAYOUT. 6. VEHICULAR ENTRY SIGNAGE A MONUMENT SIGN, AS SHOWN IS EXHIBIT 8, WILL BE INSTAi LED TO AID IN THE VEHICULAR TRAFFIC FLOW WITHIN THE AVON TOWN SQUARE DEVELOPMENT. EXHIBIT 10 SHOWS LAYOUT OF SIGN. TEXT WELL BE BLACK METAL LETTERS, STUD MOUNTED. •• • '7 ob 7. TEMPORARY SIGNAGE AFTER APPROVAL OF A PERMANENT SIGN BY THE TOWN OF AVON, THE TENANT CAN UTILIZE A TEMPORARY BANNER THE COLOR SHALL BE A TAN SIMILAR TO THE BUILDING COLOR, THE COPY WEL- BE A BLUE SIMILAR TO PMS _ COLOR, AND THE COPY SIZE, LAYOUT AND TYPESTYLE SHALL BE SIMILAR TO THAT APPROVED IN THE PERMANENT SIGNAGE. THE TEMPORARY BANNER MAY BE USED FOR A MA30MUM OF 60 DAYS DURING THE MANUFACTURING OF THE PERMANENT SIGNAGE. NO OTHER TEMPORARY SIGNS MAY BE USED, INCLUDING SALE SIGNS. 8. CONSTRUCTION AND SALE SIGNAGE THE DEVELOPERS MAY FABRICATE AND INSTALL A 4'X 8' SIGN TO BE PLACED AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT 8. THE PURPOSE OF THE SIGN IS TO NAME THE PROJECT, THE DEVELOPERS, CONTRACTORS, AND SALES AGENT. a a D w al z i r• is it SS m I T H tT . • , L' // rii--� jcys ''J I"RAMPTO\ CEN T E R �T ,6Z7 ao� VA I tl 4021 •» N i 1 i I - be EXHIBIT 6 TENANT SIGNAGE ADDITIONAL SIGN SPECIFICATIONS ACTUAL FOOTAGE BASED ON 24" COPY 23.40 30.00 24.00 24.00 28.90 22.80 21.60 30.00 28.90 28.90 28/90 24.00 28.90 28.90 *'"ACTUAL SIGNAGE WELL BE LIMITED TO LINES OF COPY TOTALLING 24 HIGH COPY FOR TWO LINES (EXCLUDING SPACE BETWEEN LINES). 1. ALL PERMITS FOR SIGNS AND THEIR INSTALLATION SHALL BE OBTAINED BY THE TENANT AND COMPLY WITH ALL GOVERNMENTAL ORDINANCES. ALL SIGNS AND THEIR INSTALLATION SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL LOCAL BUILDING, ZONING, AND ELECTRICAL CODES. 2. CONDOM M 41UM ASSOCIATION WILL SUPPLY 120V POWER TO AN ELECTICAL JUNCTION BOX IN THE SIGN AREA, A LICENSED ELECTRICIAN WILL NEED TO MAKE THE FINAL ELECTRICAL CONNECTION AFTER SIGN INSTALLATION. 3. ALL REVERSED PAN CHANNEL LETTERS WILL BE 5" DEEP, FABRICATED FROM PAINTLOK SHEET METAL (24 GUAGE), MOUNTED DIRECTLY TO THE BUILDING (NO RACEWAYS PERMITTED), AND REMOTE WIRED. THE MINIIHUM STROKE SHALL BE 13/4" TO PERMIT PK HOUSINGS FOR ALL WALL PENETRATIONS. 4. ALL NON-ILLUMINAIED COPY AND LOGO WILL BE STUD MOUNTED WITH A 1/2" TO I" REVEAL, SIMILAR TO THAT OF REVERSED PAN CHANNEL LETTERS, AND BE FABRICATED FROM CAST OR CUT OUT METAL LETTERS PAINTED. 5. ALL SIGNS ARE TO BE CENTERED HORIZONTALLY AND VERTICALLY IN THE TENANT SIGN AREA, EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION. 6. THE COLORS OF THE LETTERS SHALL BE PMS # BLUE. SQUAREFOOTAGE LINEAR FRONTAGE PERMITTED'"* LOCATION T-1 19'6" 10.95 T-2 25' 52.50 T-3 20' 42.00 T-1 20' 42.00 T-5 24' 50.00 T-6 19' 39.90 T-7 18' 37.80 T-8 25' 52.50 T-9 24' 50.00 T-10 24' 50.00 T-11 24' 50,00 T-12 20' 42.00 T-13 24' 50.00 T-14 24' 50.00 ADDITIONAL SIGN SPECIFICATIONS ACTUAL FOOTAGE BASED ON 24" COPY 23.40 30.00 24.00 24.00 28.90 22.80 21.60 30.00 28.90 28.90 28/90 24.00 28.90 28.90 *'"ACTUAL SIGNAGE WELL BE LIMITED TO LINES OF COPY TOTALLING 24 HIGH COPY FOR TWO LINES (EXCLUDING SPACE BETWEEN LINES). 1. ALL PERMITS FOR SIGNS AND THEIR INSTALLATION SHALL BE OBTAINED BY THE TENANT AND COMPLY WITH ALL GOVERNMENTAL ORDINANCES. ALL SIGNS AND THEIR INSTALLATION SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL LOCAL BUILDING, ZONING, AND ELECTRICAL CODES. 2. CONDOM M 41UM ASSOCIATION WILL SUPPLY 120V POWER TO AN ELECTICAL JUNCTION BOX IN THE SIGN AREA, A LICENSED ELECTRICIAN WILL NEED TO MAKE THE FINAL ELECTRICAL CONNECTION AFTER SIGN INSTALLATION. 3. ALL REVERSED PAN CHANNEL LETTERS WILL BE 5" DEEP, FABRICATED FROM PAINTLOK SHEET METAL (24 GUAGE), MOUNTED DIRECTLY TO THE BUILDING (NO RACEWAYS PERMITTED), AND REMOTE WIRED. THE MINIIHUM STROKE SHALL BE 13/4" TO PERMIT PK HOUSINGS FOR ALL WALL PENETRATIONS. 4. ALL NON-ILLUMINAIED COPY AND LOGO WILL BE STUD MOUNTED WITH A 1/2" TO I" REVEAL, SIMILAR TO THAT OF REVERSED PAN CHANNEL LETTERS, AND BE FABRICATED FROM CAST OR CUT OUT METAL LETTERS PAINTED. 5. ALL SIGNS ARE TO BE CENTERED HORIZONTALLY AND VERTICALLY IN THE TENANT SIGN AREA, EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION. 6. THE COLORS OF THE LETTERS SHALL BE PMS # BLUE. .. ) .. k .. �, �� ' � � i � i - ' �. - '� /. i� � `14 1 _ a r' k .. �, �� ' � � i � i - A ,40 T af le I I 'F P l fl i 141 CTT ,tee, I T. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF RLrORT December 7, 1993 Lot 39, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision Nelson Single Family Final Design Review PROJECT TYPE: Single Family Residence ZONING: PUD, Duplex COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES INTRODUCTION: Michael Sanner, on behalf of Steve Nelson, has submitted plans for final design review approval of a single family residence, with an accessory apartment, on Lot 39, Block 2 of Wildridge Subdivision. This plan was reviewed as a conceptual at the October 19, 1993 Planning and Zoning meeting and the Commission stated the residence looked nice. The lot slopes at approximately 14% from north to south., The residence is located on the southwestern portion of the site. There will be three levels, and will stand at approximately 33' in height at the tallest point. The applicant will bring color and material samples to the meeting, but they are as follows: • Roof Asphalt Shingles, charcoal in color; 300 lb., architectural dimensioned shingle • Siding: 1 x (?) lap cedar, stained with semi -transparent cedar: • Other material: stucco, painted an off-white; • Fascia: 5/4 x 10 over 5/4 x 6 (color ?) • Soffits: Tongue and Groove Pine, white washed; • Windows: Wood clad, white in color; • Window trim: 3 x 8 cedar • Doors: Wood, with natural sealer; • Door trim: 5/4 x 6 wood, stained to match doors; • Hand/deck rails: log and wood with cut outs, stained natural cedar; • Flashing: Galvanized metal; and • Chimney: Stucco l'he landscaping plan calls for twelve Quaking Aspen, 2-3 inch caliper in diameter and five Narrow leaf Cottonwood, also, 2-3 inch caliper. The plan calls for approximately 67 shrubs and forbs that include: • service berry at windbreaks, • sagebrush; • mountain mahogany; • scrub oak, • Utahjuniper, • snowberry, • white yarrow. • Indian paintbrush; • PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF RErORT December 7, 1993 r Lot 39, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision Nelson Single Family Final Design Review • • blanket flower, blue flax; • palmer penstemon; "" • black -eye Susan; and • Fcarlet globe mallow. The plan does not specify container size, but the code requires a minimum of five gallon containers. STAFF COMMENTS: The proposed single family residence meets with the Design Review Considerations as specified in Section 6.10 of the Planning and Zoning Commission Procedures, Rules and Regulations. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission approve this application with the following conditions: I. The meters be placed on the building. 2. The shrubs be a minimum of 5 gallons in size. 3. Retaining walls 4' in height or over must be designed by a licensed Engineer and the design submitted to the Town of Avon for approval prior to construction of the retaining wall. 5. All flashings, flues and vents be painted a flat dark color, or to match the color where they are located. Respectfully Submitted -rkAy- W'k Mary Holden Town Planner e• • PLANNING AND LONING COMMISSION STAFF R)h,rORT • December 7, 1993 40 Lot 39, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision Nelson Single Familg Final Design Review PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted (• ) Approved with recommended conditions (14 Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date ooa& / -.3 Sue Railton, Secretary_ AA::� The Commission qranted final design review approval with the following conditions: 1. The meters be placed on the building 2. The shrubs be a minimum of five gallons in size. 3. Any retaining walls over 4' height b- designed by a licensed engineer. 4. All flues, flashings, and vents be painted a flat dark color, or a color to match the building. F 5.30 All property owners and residents of the Town are resoonsible for determining the applicability of this Rargulaticn to their proposed development, improvement, or repair. Section 6.00_ Pesicn 6uidelin 21 i �70_De5ian Review Ccnsider aticn The Commission shall consider the following i•.ams in reviewing the design of a proposed project: 6.11 The cenfcrmar.ce with the Zoning Code and other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. 6.12 The suitability of the improvement, including type and quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located. 6.13 The compatibility of the design to minimize si.te impacts to adjacent properties. 6.14 The compatibility of proposed improvements with site topography. 6.15 The visual appearance of any proposed improvement as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public rays. 6.16 The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. 6.17 The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. 6_2-0 Desitin Criteria 6.21 General: A. Conformance with Zoning Regulations; B. General conformance with Goals, Policies and Programs as adopted by the Town of Avon; C. Adequate Development Rights for proposed improvements. 6.22 Site Improvements: A. Access to Site: 1. Adequate distance from intersections and proper relation to other entrances; 1" 2. Satisfactory width, grades, radii, etc.; , 3. Turn lanes if required. a� PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF RErORT December 7, 1993 Lot 2, Block 5, Wildridge Subdivision Spiegel Duplex Final Design Review -Modifications PROJECT TYPE: Duplex ZONING: PUD COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES INTRODUCTION: This residence received Final Design Review approval, with conditions on April 16, 1991 and final approval of those conditions on January 19, 1993. The applicant, Chris Spiegel, is requesting approval of various modifications to the building and site plan. Following are the changes being proposed: West Elevation (Front): Switching the two entry elements, they will remain the same, but be on the opposite entry as originally approved. South Elevation (Richt): • Adding dormer • Adding five windows East Elevation (Rear): • Adding deck and stairs • Changing window to door on the second level; • Adding door on first level; and • Changing two windows in style and location. Site Plan Changes: • Retaining wall in front now a boulder retaining wall. Material and Colors • Roof: Aspen gray asphalt, 300 Ib. architectural dimensioned shingle; • Body Color: 1M51D, Flagstone (gray with a blue hue) • Trim: 1D51C, Commander (darker gray with more blue hue) • Accent: 2U36B, Smoky Slate, (deep blue) STAFF COMMENTS: The changes being requested comply with the applicable codes. The boulder retaining walls, if over 4' in height, will need to be designed by a licensed Engineer. ,,:..A PLANNING AND CONING COMMISSION STAFF RETORT • December 1993 ® L 2, Block 5, Wildridge Subdivision � Spiegel Duplex Final Design Review -Modifications K 4 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission approve this request with the following conditions: I. Any retaining walls over 4' in height be designed by an licensed Engineer, and such detail be submitted to the Town of Avon for approval. 2. The meters be placed on the building. 3. All flashing, flues and vents be painted a flat dark color or match the building color where they are located. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3, Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, —/ , (Q&b_)K� Mary Holden Town Planner .•1, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF RETORT December 7. 1993 Lot 2, Block 5, Wildridge Subdivision Spiegel Duplex Final Design Review -Modifications a M PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: ob Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions (✓f Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date 0024- / { Sue Railton, Secretary ffw The Commission granted final design review approval with the following conditions: 1. A full roof product sample be brought bacl fpr approval, and it be an architectural dimensional asphalt shingle. 2. Color samples for the front doors and balconies and rails be brought back. 3. Any retaining walls over 4' in height be designed by a licensed Engineer, and such detail be submitted to the Town of Avon for approval. 4. The meters be placed on the building. 5, All flashings, flues and vents be painted a flat dark color or match the building color where they are located. 1 \`� 0 � 1 0 A 1 . � m 1 1 1 . . I Y � ` , ,. r k 4. 6 _ �, � . I I. � ., I f a ■ U n ll m G w u %PWJ PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF RE, ORT December 7. 1993 Lot 18/19, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Metcalf Place Conceptual Design Review PROJECT TYPE: Warehouse/Office ZONING: Industrial/Commercial COMPLIES WITH ZONING? Yes, With Approved SRU INTRODUCTION: Mark Donaldson has submitted plans for a conceptual review of a warehouseloffice building, of appro)dmately 27,648 square feet. It will be two stoc es in height with materials being three types of concrete block, and stucco at the bay infill areas. STAFF COMMENTS: Following are Staff concerns with the proposed project: • The 1:1 slope to the west of the building is not allowed. At a minimum it must be 2:1, or 1 1/2:1 with a soils report; • A drainage report is being required for final design review submittal. This is due to the fact that this area is a main drainage corridor for the vicinity; • An amended final plat will be required to vacate the lot line. This involves Town Council approval; • The office use will require Special Review Use approval; • If there are residential units proposed, a Special Review Use approval will be required (one residential unit is allowed/lot by Special Review); • Loading spaces need to be called out which meet Town requirements; (not loading zones); • Slope retention and retaining walls will need to be addressed by detailed design and, if necessary, designed by a licensed Engineer; and • The parking, loading spaces and circulation plan must be provided with Final Design submittal showing functional circulation within the parking areas.. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: As a conceptual review, the Staff has no formal recommendation. Respectfully Submitted Mary Holden Town Planner PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REQ JRT December 7. 1993 Lot 18/19, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Metcalf Place M4 Conceptual Design Review ti= PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( Date 4Q%, Sue Railton, Secretary 444 As a conceptual design review, no formal action was taken at this time. However, the general consensus of the Commission was that is is a very good project as long as the applicant respond to the following Staff concerns: 1. The 1:1 slope on the west side of the building is not allowed. At a �_it must ha 9.1 nr 1-1'19.1 with a snild rpnnr''__ _ 2. A drainage report is being renuired for final design review submittal, due to the fact that thsi area is a main drainage corridor for the vicinity. 3. An amended final p -t; will be required to vacate eo line. its involves Town Council approval. 4. The office use will ieclumic a S.rjecial Review Use in the stria;/Commercial District. 5 loadinq qparpc need to he called out which meet the Town requirements, not loading zones. 6. Slope retention and retaining walls will need to be addressed by detailed design and if necessary designed by a licensed engineer. 7. The parking, loading spaces and the circulation plan must be provided with final design submittal showing functional circulation within the parking area. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF RE. JRT December 7, 1993 Lot 24, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision Klein Residential Development Conceplual Design Review PROJECT TYPE: Duplex ZONING. PUD, Duplex COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES INTRODUCTION: The applicant, Jim Klein, has submitted a conceptual plan for two single family homes on Lot 24, Block 3 in Wildridge Subdivision. Submitted, also, are plans for a duplex. This lot is accessed by Wildridge Road on two sides. 1Jetached Duplex Application Staff is not reviewing the detached duplex concept since Resolution 91-17 states, ". . . the Town of Avon Council direct the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Design Review Board to no longer allow any further subdivision of residential lots in the Wildridge Subdivision. Additionally, the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Design Review Board would be instructed to enforce the regulations as written in Wildridge to interpret that two unit lots mean 'attached duplex buildings and no detached duplex allowed and three unit or greater lots would mean multi -family attached buildings of three units or more per building'." Duplex Application The lot slopes steeply from east to west. The steepest slope occurs on the east side of the lot, where the duplex is proposed. Access to the duplex is proposed by a driveway/parking bridge, that is approximately 70' in width at Wildridge Road. The materials proposed are industrial grade asphalt shingles, cedar siding and hand textured stucco. STAFF COMMENTS: The following comments should be considered by the applicant: the proposed duplex is placed on the steepest part of the site, requiring extensive retaining walls and maximum site disturbance: the driveway entrance does not meet Town standards where it ties into the road. Ads PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF RE. JRT • December 7, 1993 Ai Lot 24, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision Klein Residential Development Conceptual Design Review STAFF RECOMMENDATION: =■ As a conceptual review, the Staff has no formal recommendation. Respectfully Submitted 4'AA�- XZV611�� Mary Holden Town Planner PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF RE. JRT December 7, 1993 Lot 24, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision Klein Residential Development Conceptual Design Review PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action (✓f Date A& 3 Sue Railton, Secretary 'f/f'E-P� 1—iaweti � - The applicant actually submitted two proposals._ One was for a duplex and the second one was fora detached duplex. is o is very steep an a so has access from Wildridge Road on two sides. Due to the steepness of the lot, -the eonunission agreed with t'M al)[HiCant that the best possible soluti n would be the detached version, however, due to the moratorium on snlitting lots, hey were unable to review this ornnncal_ Considerable discussion followed on holding worksession meetings to try to come up with a solution to allow this type of construction on lots with this type of situation. The Commission and Stattcomm e o working toward dratting up policies Tor e n Council to stucy. 7 7 • EQ i [40 Ir 0 4 ! I -------------- ---------- I , �� r s l � r o - C �� C .�.� ,° , .,. , �� �_ �E/'i �' �' I �1 '` s l � r o - r r. .� �. • �� �: r. .� C "t � .� .. � .. - _ _ � ,. � � '- - I . 'J � j _ - 1 .e . . . - C • • Edi! PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT December 7, 1993 Lot 45, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Falcon Point Window Additions Final Design Review Modifications PROJECT TYPE: Multi -Unit Residential ZONING: PUD COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES INTRODUCTION Falcon Point is requesting approval to add four new windows on the northwest elevation of the building. The windows will match the existing windows in size, materials, color and alignment. STAFF COMMENTS AND CONCERNS Falcon Point is requesting the window additions to allow for more natural light in the living area of four units. The only natural light into the unit is through a door off the deck. The addition of the windows will blend with the existing windows. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission approve this application as presented. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Mary Holden Town Planner Yk I• t• PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT December 7, 1993 I• Lot 45, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Falcon Point Window Additions 40M Final Design Review Modifications PLANNING AND ZONINGG ACTION: Approved as submitted (✓) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date—.&6,c- /993 Sue Railton, Secretary The Commission qranted final design approval for the addition of four windows, as submitted.