PZC Packets 030194E2
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
March 1, 1994
Lot 3 Nottingham Station Subdivision
Nottingham Station P.U.D. Completion
PROJECT TYPE: Nottingham Station P U.D
ZONING: PUD COMPLIES WITH ZONING?
INTRODUCTION:
This is a Public Hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission.
SouthWest Partners is requesting approval for the completion of a P.U.D. for Lot 3
of Nottingham Station Subdivision. The property is currently zoned PUD, but lacks
an approved PUD Plan and Development Standards.
The property is 13.9 acres in size. The proposal consists of approximately 225,000
residential square feet comprising 160 units, which could be apartments, duplexes and
townhomes.
ZONING SUMMARY
The Nottingham Station property (consisting of Lots 1,2, and 3, Tracts A and B) was
annexed into the Town in December, 1981 At that time, Lot 3 received SPA zoning -With
no detailed uses or development standards and criteria, The zoning designation changed
from SPA to FUD in 1991. Therefore, this lot has a PUD zoning designation but no
development plan has been approved for the property This application consists of a
request to approve a Development Plan and Development Standards - thereby completing
the PUD zoning requirements for Lot 3
At the January 4, 1994 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, the proposal was
reviewed as a discussion item and the Commission commented on the following
I . Hurd Lane connection and related issues;
2 Bicycle path and location;
3. Avon Road and Hurd Lane intersection;
4. Drainage from the site in relation to the river;
5. Picnic area within the site,
6. Alignment of Hurd lane intersections within the development;
7 Linear nature of buildings along Hurd Lane;
8. Site lighting,
9. Landscaping,
10. Density being appropriate, and
II Parking.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
March 1, 1994
Lot 3 Nottingham Station Subdivision
Nottingham Station P.U.D. Completion
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Overview:
• One hundred sixty townhouse and condominium residential units are proposed for a
9.05 acre portion of Lot 3.
• A 3.51 acre portion of Lot 3 along the Eagle River will be dedicated to the Town of
Avon as Open Space.
• A 50' R.O.W. for Hurd Lane will be dedicated through the property.
Site Features:
Lot 3 is a relatively flat site with the exception of the bank along the Eagle River, which
has slopes ranging from 30-509/6. The site has mature stands of cottonwood trees, aspens,
some spruce and willows, generally following the bank along the river. There are existing
structures on the site, which are not historic.
Site Layout:
Proposed Hurd Lane provides a physical division between the two main types of housing
proposed for the development. The condominiums have been placed in a linear fashion
along the railroad tracks to buffer certain types of noise from the trains. Smaller
townhomes are located south of the proposed Hurd Lane. The river side townhomes are
situated to allow for the maximum privacy and proximity with the Eagle River corridor.
Parking is provided on the north side of the condominium buildings and along an interior
lane (Boulder Lane) for the townhouse units.
No development is proposed between the Eagle River and the 30' mean high water
setback.
Site Accessi
Access to Lot 3 from the west will be from the intersection of Hurd Lane and Avon Road.
Hurd Lane is improved to the west property line of Lat 3. This proposal provides for a
dedication of a 50' R.O.W. through the property to allow for an east/west connection of
Hurd Lane into the Eaglebend area.
There is currently no public access connection to the east of Lot 3 for a connection to
Hurd Lane in the Eaglebend area Easements in this location would allow a transit and
emergency access connection.
Oft
I�
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
March 1, 1994
Lot 3 Nottingham Station Subdivision
Nottingham Station P.U.D. Completion
PROPOSED PUD ELEMENTS:
Following are the Development Standards for the PUD:
A. Lot Area:
Does not apply
B. Site Dimensions:
Does not apply
C. Setbacks:
Setbacks shall be consistent with Title 17 and as further noted herein.
I Lot perimeter building setbacks shall be a minimum of 10' at the east and west ends of
the property
2 The north property perimeter building setback shall be a minimum of 20'
3 The south property setback shall be 30' from the mean annual high water mark as
shown on the PUD Plan.
4 Building setbacks from either side of the Hurd Lane right-of-way (to be dedicated)
shall be a minimum of 10'
5 Building to building separations shall be a minimum of 10' allowing for an
encroachment of roof and balcony projections of no more than 2' into each
setback
D. Height:
A maximum building height of 48'.
E. Density
The maximum residential density shall not exceed a total of 160 dwelling units or a total of
225,000 square feet of gross enclosed living area This is approximately 18 units per acre.
This may be achieved in a variety of solutions that meet the requirements of this document
as well as the other regulatory documents adopted by the Town of Avon
N�
04
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
March 1, 1994
Lot 3 Nottingham Station Subdivision
:"Mottingham Station P.U.D. Completion
F. Site Coveraee:
The maximum site coverage shall be 35% of the total developable area (excluding the 3.41
acre riverside dedication).
G. Landscavine:
1. A 3.51 acre Open Space Tract will be dedicated to the Town.
2. The 9.05 acre developable portion of Lot 3 will have a minimum of 20% landscape
coverage.
3. Berming shall be used wherever practical to provide minor undulation of final land
forms along Hurd Land and other open space areas. Specific berming shall be
provided along the north property line to buffer and separate these uses from the
railroad.
H. Open Space:
In addition to the above, the applicants are dedicating 3.51 acres of open space along the
Eagle River. In addition, they are proposing a pathway to the river on the western edge of
the property for the use of public to access the river A bike path along the river is not
being proposed. The bike pathway is proposed along Hurd Lane.
A playground area has been designated south of Hurd Land near the east end of the
development.
1. Parkine:
Parking requirements shall be consistent with the Off -Street Parking Table within Title 17,
Zoning Code. The parking requirements shall be met in total within each phase of
development.
The only assigned spaces shall be those within covered or enclosed areas and in front of
townhome garages.
A minimum of 35% of the total parking shall be covered or enclosed.
J. Phasine:
Phasing of the project is being proposed. Each phase shall be completed in their entirety
as approved at the time of Design Review and building permit approval. However, phases
may be combined if desired by the developer, but not reduced in scale
lag
l at
IRD
PLANNING AND ZONAii MISSION STAFF REPORT
March 1. 1994
Lot 3 Nottingham Station Su ision
Nottingham Station P.U.D. C• .zpletion
Phase I: Construction of the Hurd Lane right-of-way improvements including drainage
features and distribution of site utilities to or near each future building area and
construction of buildings 6 and 7 along with the associated site work.
Phase If: Construction of buildings 4 and 5 along with the associated site work required.
Phase III: Cors ruction of buildings 3 and 9 along with the associated site work required.
Phase IV: Construction of buildings I, 1, and 9 along with the associated site work
required.
Phase V. Construction of buildings 10, 11, 12, and 13 along with the associated site
work required.
STAFF ANALYSIS:
Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning include:
North of the site: Railroad tracks, Shopping Center Zone District:
South of the site Eagle River, Riverside PUD, which allows for residential,
West of the site. Neighborhood Commercial Zone District; and
East of the site Single family residence, Eaglebend PUD.
The applicants should be required to complete the connection of Hurd Lane and
Stonebridge Lane. This issue must be resolved prior to commencement of any
construction.
The plan shows z)ne bus stop in the development. The Transportation Master Plan
identifies this area as Phase II-Transit/Pedestrian System Improvements which states
"Tcwn Route 2 is a new service along the proposed Hurd Lane corridor Connections
would be provided between US 6/West Beaver Creek Boulevard on the west and
Stonebridge Drive on the east Specific routing of this service should conform to future
development patterns " The applicants are requesting bus service to this development
upon completion of Phase II There has been no detailed discussion on bus service for this
development to date
A wetland delineation map has been provided to Staff, which shows very little, if any,
wetlands will b� disturbed There will be no site disturbance in the 30' setback from the
mean annual high water line, which is where the majority of the wetlands are located As
an assurance that no disturbance will take place in the 30' setback, the applicants shall
install a temporary fence for protection of this area during all phases of construction.
0 �4
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
March I, 1994
Lot 3 Nottingham Station Subdivision
Nottingham Station P.U.D. Completion
STAFF COMMENTS:
1. Conformity with the Avon comprehensive plans, goals and objectives;
Comment. The proposal plan complies with the Comprehensive Plan in the intended uses
and location.
2. Conformity and compliance with the overall design theme of the town, the sub-
area desi^,a recommendations and design guidelines adopted by the town;
Comment: The proposal complies with the recommendations for the Sub -area 10,
Riverfront District.
3. Design compatibility with the immediate environment, neighborhood, and
adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building height,
buffer zones, character, and orientation;
Comment: The proposal is compatible with the surrounding properties and improvements.
4. Uses, activity, and density which provide .a compatible, efficient, and workable
relationship with surrounding uses and activity;
Comment The surrounding uses and a(;tivity dictate the level of density and use on this
property due to commercial on rate north and west and high density residential to the
east (with high density residential proposed to south).
5. Identification and mitigation or avoidance of natural and/or geologic hazards
that affect the property upon which the PUD is proposed;
Comment: Generally, site development reflects all identified site constraints. The
applicants will be constr!ctmg a protective fence to avoid any disturbance in the 30'
setback from the mean annual high water mark
6. Site plan. building design and location and open space provisions designed to
produce a functional developm;:tt responsive and sensitive to natural features,
vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the community;
Comment: The PUD Plan generally complies with this provision effectively in the
dedication of the open space along the river corridor; however, the existing vegetation,
not in the 30' setback, will be cleared from the site. The applicant has proposed
landscaping to replace the loss of the mature trees on-site.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
March 1, 1994
Lot 3 Nottingham Station Subdivision
Nottingham Station P.U.D. Completion
7. A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing on
and off-site traffic circulation that is compatible with the town transportation
plan;
Comment: Internal vehicular and pedestrian circulation and parking for the project is
functional. No river corridor pedestrian pathways are shown. Bicycles are proposed
to use Hurd Lane.
8. Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to optimize and
preserve natural features, recreation, views and function;
Comment: The dedication of the open space along the river corridor insures preservation
of the wetland area, recreation for the general public, and views of the river.
4. Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, functional and
efficient relationship throughout the development of the PUD. The phasing plan
shall clearly demonstrate that each phase can be workable, functional and
effrcieut without relying upon completion of future project phases;
Comment: The proposed phasing will only include work to be done with each phase,
thereby, minimizing premature excavation.
Ill. Adequacy of public services such as sewer, water, schools, transportation
systems, roads, parks and police and fire protection; and
Comment: The utilities are adequate to serve the project
11. That the existing streets and roads are suitable and adequate to carry
anticipated traffic within the proposed PUD and in the vicinity of the proposed
PUD.
Comment: The only existing street is a Hurd Lane extension to the property line at the
intersection of Avon Road Hurd Lane is constructed to adequately handle the
projected traffic, with a left hand turn lane onto Avon Road The proposed Hurd Lane
will be built to carry the anticipated traffic within the development.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
March 1, 1994
Lot 3 Nottingham Station Subdivision
Nottingham Station P.U.D. Completion
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission approve the PUD
Development Plan and Development Standards for Lot 3, Nottingham Station with
the following conditions:
1. The PUD Guidelines and Standards described in this report (including allowed uses,
density, site access, and development standards) be incorporated into and binding
upon the PUD zone district designation for the parcel.
2. The Hurd Lane connection be completed by the applicant prior to construction of
Phase L.
No site disturbance (including grading or structures) be allowed within the 30' mean
high water setback.
4. A protective fence be installed along the 30' setback from the mean annual high
water/100 year flood mark prior to and during all phases of construction.
A pedestrian trail/pathway be shown on the PUD Plan along the Eagle River. This trail
shall connect to Hurd Lane west of Building 1. The developer shall construct thi--
pathway during Phase I.
6. That the final PUD Development Plan show existing Lot 3, Nottingham Station
Subdivision as three (3) development tracts and one (1) open space tract and that
each tract show the size, intended use and maximum allowable density.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
March 1, 1994
Lot 3 Nottingham Station Subdivision
Nottingham Station P.U.D. Completion
RECOMMENDED ACTION
1. Introduce Application
2. Applicant Presentation
3. Open Public Hearing
4. Close Public Hearing
5. Commission Review
6. Commission Action
Respectfully Submitted
ItH
Steve Amsbaugh
Director of Community Development
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
March I, 1994
Lot 3 Nottingham Station Subdivision
Nottingham Station P.U.D. Completion
PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION:
Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( )
Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued (✓f Denied ( )
Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action
Date -3111 Sue Railton, Secretary 1A�/[�..
After considerable public input and discussion from the applicants and
C m ssion mem ers, the Come ssion tabled this item until the March
15, 1994 meeting.
9
A
4
G
V
A
4
G
64 so
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
March 1, 1994
Mountain Star, Filing 2
Mountain Star Subdivision
PUD Amendment
PROJECT TYPE: Mountain Star PUD Amendment
ZONING PUD COMPLIES WITH ZONING) Yes
INTRODUCTION
This is a Public Hearing to consider rezoning 619.75 acres of land currently zoned
Open Space, Landscaping and Drainage (OLD) to Planned knit Development
(PUD) and amend the Mountain Star PUD to include this property.
The existing PUD was approved on January 12, 1993 and includes 88 single family
residences with caretaker units The acreage for the existing PUD is 683.94
In October, 1993, the US Forest Service issued a Decision Notice that will result in
conveyance of 626.94 acres of National Forest land to Mountain Star Limited Liability
Company This land exchange included a detailed Wildlife Mitigation Agreement and a
Conservation Easement to protect sensitive plant and animal species.
As a result of the land exchange, Mountain Star Limited Liability Company, has submitted
an application requesting an amendment to the existing Mountain Star PUD The
amendment would include the addition of 619.75 total acres with the following
specific uses:
1. Six additional residential lots (Lots 89,90,91,92,93and 94),
2. A new location of ranch central (Tract X),
3. 567.34 acres designated as open space (Tracts V and W).
The remaining 7 19 acre Tract Y, located adjacent to and east of Metcalf Road, will be
dedicated to the Town of Avon This dedication will occur with the subdivision of this
property
Access:
Access to the Mountain Star PUD and this amendment is from existing Mountain Star
Drive and existing Wildwood Road
Utilities:
Utility to this amended PUD will include
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
March 1. 1994
Mountain Star, Filing 2
Mountain Star Subdivision
PUD Amendment
Water Avon Metropolitan District (area not currently in District)
Sewer Upper Eagle Valley Consolidated Sanitation District
Elect, Gas, Phone, Cable will be extended from locations in Mountain Star Filing 1, as
necessary.
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS:
Permitted Uses
A. Not more than one signal family residential dwelling unit shall be permitted per platted
lots 1-94 (Each single family residence may include, as an accessory unit not to be sold
or conveyed separately from the primary unit, one caretaker/guest residential dwelling unit
not to exceed 1,800 square feet.) Accessory uses may include garages, swimming pools,
patios, gazebos, private greenhouses, or other recreational facilities customarily incidental
to single family residential uses.
B. Tracts A, B, C, E, F, J, L, N, P, T, Q. and V are designated as open space. Trails,
picnic benches, decks, enclosed amenities, and other similar recreational facilities and
accessory uses shall be permitted within these tracts.
C. Tracts H, G, 1, K, and M are designated as access, open space and utilities. Tracts S,
D, O, and U are designated as access and utilities. The allowable uses of these tracts shall,
in addition to the uses allowed on open space tracts, be vehicular access and utility
services.
D. Tract X, in addition to the uses listed above shall permit the following uses
caretaker dwelling unit
temporary sales office
project manager's office
homeowner's association office
neighborhood post office
enclosed equipment storage
accessory uses
E. Tract W, in addition to the uses listed above, shall allow a summer -use only equestrian
center and accessory uses as shown on the he Mountain Star Filing No 2 Development
Plan.
oft
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
March 1, 1994
Mountain Star, Filing 2
Mountain Star Subdivision
PUD Amendment
Minimum Lot Area:
Lot areas are shown on the PUD Plan Map.
Lot 89
4.21 acres
Lot 90
3.03 acres
Lot 91
11.29 acres
Lot 92
5.91 acres
Lot 93
3.84 acres
Lot 94
2.99 acres
Tract X (Ranch Central)
4 60 acres
Open Space
567.34 acres
Mt. Star Drive
16.54 acres
Minimum Buildine Setbacks:
Front - 20 feet
Side - 20 feet
Rear - 15 feet
iw
The above setbacks apply to lots 1-94, inclusive with the following exceptions due to
special site circumstances and topographical limitations
Lot 37 shall be permitted a rear setback of 5 feet.
Lots 67, 74, and 75 shall be permitted a front setback of 5 feet
Buildine Height:
Maximum building height shall not exceed 40 feet
Maximum Site Covernee:
30%
Minimuminot max.) Landscape Area
5000
tNo
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
March 1. 1994
Mountain Star, Filing 2
Mountain Star Subdivision
PUB Amendment
Maximum Density:
dm
One single family dwelling unit per lot, plus one caretaker/guest dwelling unit per lot.
Parkine•
Provided in accordance with Section 17.24, Parking Standards, Zoning Code.
aLzm
All signs shall conform to the Town of Avon Sign Regulations
Road Standards:
All road standards shall conform to previously approved standards for the Mountain Star
PUD and related Plats
STAFF COMMENTS:
Access to the summer -only use equestrian center has not been shown and needs to be
indicated.
The trails referred to in the PUD are not shown on the plat and need to be shown.
Further, the trails need to be indicated as public or private.
There is a trail head and related parking that has been approved for Mountain Star Drive,
but not indicated on the PUD Plan. Staff is requesting that the trail head and parking be
shown.
The Commission should consider the following Design Criteria in :valuating a
proposed PUD:
1. Conformity with the Avon comprehensive plans, goals and objectives;
Comment: The proposed plan complies with the Comprehensive Plan in the intended uses
and with the sites location.
000
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
March 1, 1994
Mountain Star, Filing 2
Mountain Star Subdivision
PUD Amendment
2. Conformity and compliance with the overall design theme of the town, the sub-
area design recommendations and design guidelines adopted by the town;
Comment The proposed project complies with the Town's design theme and guidelines
3. Design compatibility with the immediate environment, neighborhood, and
adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bvlk, building height,
buffer zones, character, and orientation;
Comment The proposal is compatible with the surrounding properties and improvements
4. Uses, activity, and density which provide a compatible, efficient, and workable
relationship with surrounding uses and activity;
Comment: The intended residential uses will compliment the surrounding residential uses
5. Identification and mitigation or avoidance of natural and/or geologic haze -ds
that affect the property upon which the PUD is proposed;
Comment. An extensive environmental assessment was prepared for the exchange..
6. Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions designed to
produce a functional development responsive and sensitive to natural features,
vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the community;
Comment: Of a total of 619 total acres, 36 acres are proposed as residential use In
addition, individual homesites are selected for each lot
7. A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing on
and off-site traffic circulation that is compatible with the town transportation
plan;
Comment Internal circulation and parking for the project is existing
8. Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to optimize and
preserve natural features, recreation, views and function;
Comment A majority of the parcel proposed for inclusion into the PUD will be
designated open space.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
March 1. 1994
Mountain Star, Filing 2
Mountain Star Subdivision
PUD Amendment
9. Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, functional and
efficient relationship throughout the development of the PUD. The phasing plan
shall clearly demonstrate that each phase can be workable, functional and
efficient without relying upon completion of future project phases;
Comment: No phasing is proposed.
10. Adequacy of public services such as sere, water, schools, transportation systems,
roads, parks and police and fire protection; and
Comment: The utilities are in place and are adequate to serve the project. Project must
petition for inclusion into the Water District.
I I. That the existing streets and roads are suitable and adequate !o carry
anticipated traffic within the proposed PUD and in the vicinity of the proposed
PUD.
Comment: The existing streets are adequate to handle the additional traffic.
In addition to the above guidelines, Section 17.28.080 establishes criteria for review,
recommendation and approval of a rezoning, which are listed below:
1. Is the proposed rezoning justified by changed or changing conditions in the
character of the area proposed to be rezoned?
Comment. Is justified by the change in character of the area created by the adjacent
residential developments.
2. Is the proposed rezoning consistent with the Town's Comprehensive Plan?
Comment The proposed PUD amendment is consistent with Comprehensive Plan
3. Is the proposed use(s) compatible with the surrounding area or uses?
Comment The proposed use will compliment the surrounding residential uses
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
March 1, 1994
Mountain Star, Filing 2
Mountain Star Subdivision
PUD Amendment
4. Are adequate facilities available to serve development for the type and scope
suggested by the proposed zone?
Comment: There are adequate facilities available to serve the proposed project.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Commission approve the rezoning of the 619.75 acres
from OLD to PUD and amend the existing Mountain Star PUD by incorporating an
additional 619.75 acres into the PUD, with the following findings and conditions :
Findings:
1. The rezoning is justified due to the changing character of the area.
2. The rezoning is consistent with the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan.
3. The proposed use is compatible and complimentary to the surrounding area and
uses.
Conditions:
I . The amendment to the Mountain Star PUD will be incorporated into the existing
Mountain Star PUD. Subdivision of this land will be identified as Mountain Star
Filing Number 2.
2. The PUD Plan and PUD Guidelines and Standards described above (including
allowed uses, site access and development standards) be incorporated into and
binding upon the PUD zone district designation for this parcel of land.
3. The property be annexed into the Avon Metropolitan Water District.
4. Access to the proposed equestrian area must be shown on the PUD Plan.
5. Public trails and related parking areas must be shown on the PUD Plan.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
March 1, 1994
Mountain Star, Filing 2
Mountain Star Subdivision
PUD Amendment
RECOMMENDED ACTION
1. Introduce Application
2. Applicant Presentation
3. Open Public Hearing
4. Close Public Hearing
5. Commission Review
6. Commission Action
Respectfully Submitted
J
Steve Amsbaugh
Director of Community Development
0•
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
March 1. 1994
04 Mountain Star, Filing 2
Mountain Star Subdivision
PUD Amendment
PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION:
Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions (�
Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( )
Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( )
Date 3/Jy_ Sue Railton, Secretary /tis
/ /
The Commission approved Planning and Zoning�Commission Resolution 94-2,
recommending T0'f >F e o Town ofunc i l'Tp v ifA ening Of 619.75
Acres Of Land Currently Zoned Open Space, Landscaping And Drainage To Planned
Unit BevelvpmerttAged Amend The Mountain StaF Planned Unit Beveloplilent To
Include This Property, which includes the Findings 1, 2, 3, and the
rnnditinns ae recommended by Staff_
r
L'
Al
so
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
March 1, 1994
Lot 63, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision
Guida Du nilex
Final Design Review
PROJECT TYPE: Guida Duplex
ZONING: PUD, Two Units COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES
INTRODUCTION:
T
ohn Railton has submitted an application for final design review of a three level duplex on
behalf of Mike and Lisa Guida. The duplex will be located on Lot 63, which is
approximately I acre in size and has slopes ranging from 2440%. Access to the property
is from Fox Lane. The east portion of the lot will contain the driveway access and the two
proposed garages.
Unit A contains 3096 square feet with a 660 square foot garage. Included, also, in unit A
is a wood bumer, which the applicant must pay a $1,500 fee to secure. Unit B contains
2438 square feet with a 528 square foot garage and a gas fireplace, Site lighting will be
provided via wall lights on the building at all exterior doors.
The duplex will consist of the following materials:
Roof
cedar shingles
natural in color
Siding
1 x 8 rough sawn shiplap
green
Other
stucco on concrete
gray
Fascia
rough sawn cedar
green
Soffits
rough sawn fir
gray
Window
wood metal clad
beige
Window Trim
2 x 10 rough sawn cedar
not given
Door
wood metal clad
beige
Hand/ Deck Rail
rough sawn cedar
green
Flues/Flashings
galvanized metal
gray
Chimney
stucco
gray
The colors indicated on the application do not coincide with the colored rendering.
The landscape plan consists of 13 aspen at 2" caliper, 1 Russian olive at 8-10' in height, 5
ponderosa pine at 6'-8' high, and select shrubs and perennials. Sod and native grasses are
shown for revegitation with an irrigation system.
The Commission reviewed this project as a conceptual on January 18, 1994, and at that
meeting the Commission commented on:
' The use of metal as a roofing material;
$4
M:
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
March 1, 1994
Lot 63, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision
Guida Duplex
Final Design Review
* Overhang on the back being cantilevered or supported with devices other than a
post;
* Introduction of a second material; and
* The west elevation being more varied
STAFF COMMENTS:
Staff has reviewed the proposal and following are our comments.
Site Plan Comments.
The rock and concrete retaining walls on the south portion of the site need to be
moved out of the sideyard setback and easement, or a variance granted for their
location;
The required grading plan, for the issuance of a building permit, must show true linuts
of disturbance;
Retaining walls over 4' in height must be designed by an engineer;
A concrete driveway has been proposed, but the driveway must have an asphalt apron
where it ties into Fox Lane, and
A culvert needs to be added under the driveway entrance.
DESIGN REVIEW CONSIDERATIONS:
The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of this project.
Conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable regulations of the Town.
Comment This proposal is in conformance with Town codes
The suitability of the improvement, including type and quality of materials of which
it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located.
Comment The type and quality of proposed building and landscape materials are
consistent with Town guidelines and the Wildridge Subdivision.
The compatibility of the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties.
Comment. All impacts will be contained on site
r�
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
March 1, 1994
Lot 63, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision
Guida Duplex
Final Design Review
The compatibility of the proposed improvements with site topography.
CommentThe design will minimize the impact to the site.
The visual appearance of any proposed improvement as viewed from adjacent and
neighboring properties and public ways.
Comment: This lot slopes away from the street and the adjacent property is higher than
the proposed improvements.
The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the
vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired.
Comment: The proposal meets the objective of this guideline.
The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals,
Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon.
Comment: The proposal is in conformance with the goals, policies and programs for the
Town of Avon.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Commission approve this application with the following conditions
I. Where the driveway ties into Fox Lane, an asphalt apron be provided, instead of
concrete.
2. A culvert be added under the driveway at the entrance to the lot.
3. The building height not exceed 35'.
4. The rock and concrete retaining walls on the south portion of the site be moved out
the sideyard setback and easement or a variance granted for their location.
5. Meters be placed on the building.
6. All flashing, flues and vents must have a finished surface to match the building.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
March 1. 1994
Lot 63, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision
Guida Duplex
Final Design Review
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
1. Introduce Application
2. Applicant Presentation
3. Commission Review
4. Commissior Action
Respectfully Submitted
Mary Holden
Town Planner
PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION:
Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions (�
Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( )
Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( )
Date 3 / _Sue Railton, Secretary ,A -
SEE ATTACHED PAGE
Lot 63, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision
Guida Duplex
Final Design Review
The Commission granted final design review approval with the
following conditions:
1. Where the driveway ties into Fox Lane, an asphalt apron be provided
instead of concrete.
2. A culvert be added under the driveway at the entrance to the lot.
3. The building height not exceed 35'.
4. The rock and concrete retaining walls on the south portion of the
site be moved out of the sideyard setback and easement or a variance
granted for their location.
5. Meters be placed on the building.
6. All flashings, flues and vents must have a finished surface to match
the building.
7. Additional landscaping of the natural variety, including sage and
natural grasses be placed 'n close proximity to the supports on the
loner four corners of the house.
8. All color samples, including stucco samples be brought back to this
Board for approval.
9. Cut sheets for the light fixtures be brought back along with the
color samples.
10. Limits of construction be shown on the site plan.
004
+ewe _ s.a se
WR D
GENERA_ :07ze
wlr «roGw,w �m.uo.
ww4+w r� .A.0 .nv
�o..,.cmrt x .tavr n.v
t.alw I,IPt,lto arf.m
s.nVlfi WMItb. AW..
MM 1V .MR
C4YRT N.I. A4 eRIVZ
.iO4e QIG-hQO•f r(.01
AND5GAvr_NOTE:
p.5N .•0Mf � t
4T..MAK UI.tLttANG
d ni.t4w Anw.
:ws ,...✓Te.G •Ravin
c.Iwiuc ants C+ta
i
•.e. Mal.
. •-�•
wlr «roGw,w �m.uo.
ww4+w r� .A.0 .nv
�o..,.cmrt x .tavr n.v
t.alw I,IPt,lto arf.m
s.nVlfi WMItb. AW..
MM 1V .MR
C4YRT N.I. A4 eRIVZ
.iO4e QIG-hQO•f r(.01
AND5GAvr_NOTE:
p.5N .•0Mf � t
4T..MAK UI.tLttANG
d ni.t4w Anw.
:ws ,...✓Te.G •Ravin
c.Iwiuc ants C+ta
m
a
' Y 7
r
bA
i
a
V
' Y 7
�i
y
/ k
-
I. I .
� -
�`
� • .n.
�yT�
. �a
� �
_
_ ..
.,
,,
'
�i
dw
r 21
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
March 1, 1994
Lot 53, Block 4, Wlldridge Subdivision
Duplex
Conceptual Design Review
PROJECT TYPE: Duplex
ZONING: PUD COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES
INTRODUCTION:
An application for conceptual review of a duplex has been submitted by George Plaver.
The duplex will be located on lot 53, which is approximately 1.65 acres and slopes to the
west at approximately 24-28%.
The duplex will contain two levels and stand approximately 28-32' in height Building
orientation is to the south. There will be a total of approximately 5500 square feet for
both duplexes
The duplex will consist of the following materials
Roof
asphalt shingles
slate green
Siding
cedar bevel lap
natural
Other
stucco
white
Fascia
cedar
natural
Soffits
T & G cedar
natural
Windows
clad/wood
white
Window Trim
brick mold
white
Doors
clad/%-
natural
Door Trim
bri-
white
Hand/ Deck Rail
logs
natural
Flues/Flashings
G A
natural
Chimney
stucco
white
The landscape plan consist of the following
Blue Spruce
3
8-10'
Aspen
28
1" cal
Russian Olive
8
6' min
Tammy Juniper
21
i gal.
Potentilla
13
1 gal
STAFF COMMENTS:
Staff has reviewed the proposal and following are our comments.
W-4
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
March 1, 1994
Lot 53, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision
Duplex
Conceptual Design Review
Site Plan Comments:
1. An accurate grading plan, on a certified topography of the site, showing true limits of
disturbance, all easements and the limit of developable land must be submitted for
Final Design Review;
2. The building appears to abut the setbacks, in which case, overhangs are not allowed to
extend into the setl;acks;
3. Snow storage a:.eas need to be called out on the site plan;
4. Retaining walls over 4' in height need to be designed by an engineer;
`i. The boulder retaining wall needs to be reflected on the site plan;
6. Type of driveway needs to be indicated;
7. Landscaping should be located out of snow storage areas and at least 4' from the
building;
Design Comments:
. Indicate gas or wood burning for the proposed fireplaces;
2. An east elevation needs to be submitted for Final Design Review,
3. The landscape plan must meet the minimum size requirements (2" caliper for
deciduous tree, 6' minimum height for coniferous, and 5 gallon minimum for shrubs)
and irrigation is recommended for planting bed and tree clusters;
4. Building lighting needs to be reflected on the elevations submitted for FDR;
5. Are there additional floor plans for west unit' If so, submit them for FDR;
6. Clarify whether the arches are open underneath,
7. Indicate type of material and color for garage doors.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
As a conceptual review, the Staff has no formal recommendation.
Respectfully Submitted
Mary Holden
Town Planner
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
March 1. 1994
Lot 53, Block 4, Wiidridge Subdivision
Duplex
Conceptual Design Review
PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION:
Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( )
Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( )
Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action (✓f pI
Date ✓3 l / Sue Railton, Secretary
As a conceptual review, no formal action was taken at this time. The
Commission generally liked the project, u asked the applicant o provide
a massing model at final design to show how the building was stepped down
the site a, d te—de as
also asked to provide color samples and roofing material samples at
final deeign review_
U
� F -
t11
w
so
t1a
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
March 1. 1994
Lot 2, Block 5, Wildridge Subdivision
SpiegeIrfracey Duplex
Final Design Review -Condition of Approval
PROJECT TYPE: Duplex
ZONING: PUD COMPLIES WITH ZONING" YES
INTRODUCTION:
This residence received Final Design Review approval, with conditions on April 16, 1991,
and final approval of those conditions on January 19, 1993 At the December 7, 1993,
Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, the applicant received approval for various
modifications with conditions.
Two of the conditions are that a roof product sample be brought back for approval and it
be architecturally dimensioned asphalt shingles, and color samples for the front doors,
balconies and rails be brought back The applicant has submitted the roof sample and
colors for Commission approval
The roof sample is from GAF Building Materials Corp, their Timberline Series, and is
slate blend
Following are the proposed building colors
Body
Flagstone 1M51D, (gray)
Trim
Commander, ID51C, (dark gray)
Accent
Smoky Slate, 2U36B, (dark blue)
Front Door
Commander
Balconies
Commander
Rails
Commander
STAFF COMMENTS
The color scheme and the roof material will appropriately blend with each other and the
adjacent neighbors
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Since this is a review of a condition of approval, State has no recommendation
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
March 1. 1994
Lot 2, Block 5, Wildridge Subdivision
Spiegel/Tracey Duplex
Final Design Review -Condition of Approval
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
1. Introduce Application
2. Applicant Presentation
3. Commission Review
4. Commission Action
Respectfully submitted.
-';/0 0-'J
Mary Holden
Town Planner
PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION:
Approved as submitted (100( Approved with recommended conditions ( )
Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( )
Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( )
Date ! Sue Railton, Secretary
The conditions for approval of this project were that the applicant bring
back the colors and roofing material samples s o pprova The omm ssion
granted final design approval for the colors and roofing material
presented, , Hunn voting nay.
i
so
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
March 1, 1994
Lot 63, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Seasons at Avon
Final. Design Review -Modifications
PROJECT TYPE: Commercial Building
ZONING: TC - Town Center
COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES
INTRODUCTION:
Mark Donaldson, on behalf of the Seasons at Avon, has submitteu an application for
modifications, as follows
I Addition of four skylights in place of the roof monitor in the lobby,
2 Addition of a water cooling tower and enclosure on the east side of the building
STAFF COMMENTS:
The four proposed skylights will be 48" x 48" and match the other sk,, :ghts in material
and coloring (see attached plan view)
The cooling tower will be contained in a 15' x 24' enclosure which will be finished with
stucco It will stand 12' high and be located on the east side of the building, on the
property line The enclosure needs to be located out of the side yard setback, which is7 5
feet, or a variance applied for and approval given for the encroachment
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Planning and 'Zoning Commission approve this application with the
following conditions
I That all modifications match the approved color theme and design styles
2 The cooling water tower and enclosure be located out of the 7 5 foot side yard setback
or a variance given for the encroachment
Al
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
March 1. 1994
Lot 63, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Seasons at Avon
Final Design Review -Modifications
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
1. Introduce Application
2. Applicant Presentation
3. Commission Review
4. Commission Action
Respectfully submitted,
Mary Holden
Town Planner
oft
/i
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
March 1, 1994
Lot 63, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Seasons at Avon
Final Design Review -Modifications
PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION:
Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( )
Approved with modifed conditions ( ) Continued Denied ( 1
Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action
Date 3 % __Sue Railton, Secretary
Since no representative for the Seasons at Avon was present, the
i4�1994 meting.__
i
EEu1111 .TIMI HIVILY
• .. hlrj� .
:.y
12'-O-Hfgh
5 1/2'*M '
N SHEA 6
BOTH •S!M-
ocq
zLU
Q `\
�Z o�
nil)
Ul
U�O
f- w
.
N
�
U1 fes-
U~l
Lf)
i j .
ocq
zLU
Q `\
�Z o�
nil)
lit
✓
�yf
�
,0ij
fir •"
�
�!
t
±
•
�
J
! i
�l
?
r)�
�. .
j'
ala
S, Y
�^
4
- -
.y
•
1a
Y�
i
f
♦
�'
r
S
rfj
, d
