PZC Packet 091989STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
September 19, 1989
Lot 24, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Deep Rock Water Distribution Facility
Landscape Design
INTRODUCTION
The applican- wishes to alter the conditions of final design
review apprc,-al in regards to the requirement that a concrete
curb and gutter be placed a'ong entrance drives.
The applicant stipulates that revisions to the drainage plan,
which calls for the inclusion of a 4' wide and 2" deep
concrete cross pan at the eastern driveway entrance causes
the location of a raised concrete curb along the entrance
drives to be impractical.
STAFF COMMENTS
Section 6.10 - The Commission shall consider the following
items in reviewing the design of a proposed project:
6.11 - The conformance with the Zoning Code and
other applicable rules and regulations of the Town, of Avon.
COMMENT: The proposed change appears to meet
applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon.
Unusual drainage conditions occur.
6.12 - The suitability of the improvement,
including type and qL-ality of materials of which it is to be
constructed and the s,te upon which it is to be located.
COMMENT: The type and quality of materials are
compatible with existing structures in the vicinity.
6.13 - The compatibility of the design to :Minimize
site impacts to adjacent properties.
COMMENT: The compatibility of the drainage design
appears to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties.
6.14 - The compatibility of proposed improvements
with site topography.
COMMENT: The location of the cross pan indicates
that it is compatible with site topography.
6.15 - The visual appearance of any proposed
improvement as viewed from adjacent and neighboring
M
a
Staff Report to the Planning and Zoning Commission
September 19, 1989
Page 2 of 3
Lot 24, Block 1, Benchmark ac Beaver Creek
Deep Rock Water Distribution Facility
Landscape Design
properties and public ways.
COMMENT: The visual appearance of the cross pan
gutter .foes not appear to pose any deleterious nor enhancing
effects from or upon adjacent and neighboring properties and
public ways.
6.16 - Tha objective that no improvement be so
similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values,
monetary or aesthetic will be impaired.
COMMENT: The improvement is not so s-milar or
dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or
aesthetic will be impaired.
6.17 - The general conformance of the proposed
improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs
for the Town of Avon.
COMMENT: The proposal is in general conformance
with adopt3d Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of
Avon.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The cross pan is a suitable curbing material to allow for the
circulation of heavy industrial vehicles while preventing
breakup and deterioration along the edge of asphaltic
surfaces.
Consistency of curbing materials throughout the
industrialized area should f considered. Raised curbing is
often heavily damaged due co the circulation of industrial
vehicles.
The landscape plan was not reviewed in consideration of this
application.
Suitable means and method of maintenance should be identified
to protect landscape areas in heavy traffic circulation areas
from excessive damage, mutilation or demolition.
Staff Report to the Planning and Zcming Commission
September 19, 1989
Page 3 of 3
Lot 24, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Deep Rock Water Distribution Facility
Landscape Design
The qualitative appearance of landscaped areas in the
industrialized areas is an essential design, element in the
enhancement of the aesthetic character of the community.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
1. Introduce Application (Staff);
2. Presen;.ation by Applicant;
3. Staff Comments;
4. Commission Review - Action
Respectfully submitted,
James F. Lamont
PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION
i
Approved as Submitted (✓ )
Approved with Recommended
Conditions ( ) Approved with Modified Conditions ( )
Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( )
Date 9- lea Y g Denise Hi 11 , Secretary 1G 1udZ 1U1
The Commission granted final approval to Lot 24, Block 1, Benchmark at
Beaver Creek, Deep Rock Water Distribution Facility drainage alterations
as presented.
a
e
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
September 19, 1989
Lot 25, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Mini -Warehouse Facility
Landscape Design
INTRODUCTION
The applicant wishes to alter the conditions of final design
review approval in regards to the requirement that a concrete
curb and gutter be placed along entrance drives.
The applicant stipulates that revisions to the drainage plan,
which calls for the inclusion of a 4' wide and 2" deep
concrete cross pan at the eastern driveway entrance causes
the location of a raised concrete curb along the entrance
drives to be impractical.
STAFF COMMENTS
Section 6.10 - The Commission shall consider the following
items in reviewing the design of a proposed project:
6.11 - The conformance with the Zoning Code and
other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon.
COMMENT: The proposed change appears to meet
applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon.
Unusual drainage conditions occur.
6.12 - The suitability of the improvement,
including type and quality of materials of which it is to be
constructed and the site upon which it is to be located.
COMMENT: The type and quality of materials are
compatible with existing structures in the vicinity.
6.13 - The compatibility of the design to minimize
site impacts to adjacent properties.
COMMENT: The compatibility of the drainage design
appears to minimize site impacts :o adjacent properties.
6.14 - The compatibility of proposed improvements
with site topography.
COMMENT: The location of the cross pan indicates
that it is compatible with site topography.
6.15 - The visual appearance of any proposed
improvement as viewed from adjacent and neighboring
Staff Report to the Planning and Zoning Commission
September 19, 1989
Page 2 of 3
Lot 25, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Mini -Warehouse Facility
Landscape Design
properties and public ways.
COMMENT: The visual appearance of the cross pan
gutter does not appear to pose any deleterious nor enhancing
effects from or upon adjacent and neighboring properties and
public ways.
6.16 - The objective that no improvement be so
similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values,
monetary or aesthetic will be impaired.
COMMENT: The improvement is not so similar or
dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or
aesthetic will be impaired.
6.17 - The general conformance of the proposed
improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs
for the Town of Avon.
COMMENT: The proposal is in general conformance
with adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of
Avon.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The cross pan is a suitable curbing material to allow for the
circulation of heavy industrial vehicles while preventing
breakup and deterioration along the edge of asphaltic
surfaces.
Consistency of curbing materials throughout the
industrialized area should be considered. Raised curbing is
often heavily damaged due to the circulation of industrial
vehicles.
The landscape plan was not reviewed in consideration of this
application.
Suitable means and method of maintenance should .')e identified
to protect landscape areas in heavy traffic circulation areas
from excessive damage, mutilation or demolition.
Staff Report to the Planning and Zoning Commission
September 19, 1989
Page 3 of 3
Lot 26, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Mini -Warehouse Facility
Landscape Design
The qualitative appearance of landscaped areas in the
industrialized areas is an essential design element in the
enhancement of the aesthetic character of the community.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
1. Introduce Application (Staff);
2. Presentation by Applicant;
3. Staff Comments;
4. Commission Review - Action
Respectfully submitted,
James F. Lamont
PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION
Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended
Conditions ( ✓) Approved with Modified Conditions ( )
Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( )
Date 9-19-69 Danise Hill, Secretary P. d
The Commission granted approval for the drainage alterations on Lot 25,
Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek, Mini -Warehouse Facility, with the
condition that the owner will maintain the filter gallery, stipulating
both on and off site maintenance.
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
September 13, 193Q
Lot 38, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision
Ackerman Single Family Residence
Design Review
INTRODUCTION
The applicant wishes to construct on Lot 38, Block 2 of the
Wildridge Subdivision a single family residence.
The site plan indicates that the single family residence is
the first phase of a detached suplex proposal.
According to information contained in the application, the
proposed structure is 2,434 square feet with a full basement
having on -grade access. At its highest point the structure
is 33 feet above grade.
The exterior of the structure is "mushroom" colored stucco,
natural color sealer cedar fascia, forest green custom color
clad windows, and cedar single shakes on all roofs.
The site plan indicates that disturbed areas of land will be
revegetated with natural grasses, specific types of grasses
are not indicated. Approximately 50% of the site will be
disturbed. Type of existing vegetation is native grasses,
sage, and indigenous low brush. Along the southern boundary
of the site, extensive revegetation has been conducted to
cover sewer line excavation. Twelve 2-1/2 gallon narrow leaf
cottonwood trees are indicated on the site plan.
The building, deck and driveway coverage is approximately
13.7% of the site. The usable open space area is not
indicated on site plan.
Main drainage channel for the site is not indicated on the
site plan. Driveway grade is 7.5%.
STAFF COMMENTS
Section 6.10 - The Commission shall consider the following
items in reviewing the design of a proposed project:
6.11 - The conformance with the Zoning Code and
other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon.
COMMENT: The project appears to meet applicable
rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. No unusual
conditions occur.
Staff Report
September 19,
Page 2 of 4
to the Planning and Zoning Commission
1989
Lot 38, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision
Ackerman Single Family Residence
Design Review
6.12 - The suitability of the improvement,
including type and quality of materials of which it is to be
constructed and the site upon which it is to be located.
COMMENT: The type and quality of materials are
compatible with existing structures in the vicinity.
6.13 - The compatibility of the design to minimize
site impacts to adjacent properties.
COMMENT: The driveway entrance has been located at
the best location to observe traffic and minimize the grade
of the driveway.
6.14 - The compatibility of proposed improvements
with site topography.
COMMENT: Thi alteration of topography and removal
of vegetation may be excessive. Drainage appears to be
sufficient. Disturbed areas should be reduced and fill areas
consolidated.
6.15 - The visual appearance of any p,-oposed
improvement as viewed from adjacent and neighboring
properties and public ways.
COMMENT: The visual appearance of the residence
does not appear to pose any deleterious effects from adjacent
and neighboring properties: and public ways.
6.16 - The objective that no improvement be so
similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values,
monetary or aesthetic will be impaired.
COMMENT: The improvement is residential in nature
and is not so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity
that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired.
6.17 - The general conformance of the proposed
improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs
for the Town of Avon.
COMMENT: The proposal is in general conformance
with adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of
Staff Report to the Planning and Zoning Commission
September 19, 1989
Page 3 of 4
Avon.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
An appropriately sized culvert be located in drainage channel
at the beginning of the driveway.
Consolidation of fill dirt areas should be considered.
Consolidation will reduce the disturbed area of the site.
Snow storage areas and drainage swales should be indicated on
the site plan.
The applicant has not submitted materials or exterior color
samples for review.
Setback lines should be indicated on the site plan.
Dimensions indicating location of structure in relationship
to north property line should be shown on the site plan.
The applicant has not indicated method of irrigation.
Suitability of vegetation material for local climate cannot
be determined. Revegetation methods for disturbed areas
having steep slopes cannot be determined. Method of
maintaining revegetated areas is not indicated. Letter
indicating specific means and methods of maintaining
revegetation areas should be submitted.
Utility locations and alignments should be indicated on site
plan.
Exterior lignting: Should be located on site plan.
Compatibility of detached duplex cannot be determined at this
time.
Staff Report t3 the Planning and Zoning Commission
September 19, 1989
Page 4 of 4
Lot 38, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision
Ackerman Single Family Residence
Design Review
RECOMMENDED ACTION
1. Introduce Application (Staff);
2. Presentation by Applicant;
3. Staff Comments;
4. Commission Review - Action
Respectfully submitted,
James F. Lamont
PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION
Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended
Conditions ( ✓) Approved with Modified Conditions ( )
Continued ( ) Dr,nied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) ',n
Date q-lq-g)9 IJ'�M
Denise Hill, Secretary a a
The Commission granted final design approval for Lot 38, Block 2,
Wildridge, as a single family residence, with the understanding that this
Commission is not endorsing a detached duplex concept, and that if the
second unit is developed in the future, it will nave to meet the Town's
zoning crdinances. Approval is conditioned by:
1 The applicant complete the information requested by staff
and resubmit.
2 The applicant submit a more detailed lanascape plan to the
board for their review.
3 The applicant submit cut sheets for any liqht f;,xtures, attached
or detached, on the site.
These conditions must be submitted prior to final certificate of occupancy.