Loading...
PZC Packet 060689STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION June 6, 1989 Lots 26/27, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Mountain Center Buiding Unit B-2 Jerry's Automotive Repair Special Review Use Jerry Vekre Owner Public Hearing Continuance Page 1 of 3 Jerry Vekre of Jerry's Automotive Repair is seeking continuance of a Special Review Use approval of his business in the Mountain Center Building. Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution 88-8, adopted August 16, 1988 recommended to approve the SRU with six conditions, the sixth one being; re-evaluation at the time Phase II of the project is started or not later than June 1, 1989. Mr. Vekre applied for re-evaluation at the May 16, 1989 meeting and the item was continued to the June 6th meeting. The May 16th staff report recommended approval of the continuance of the Special Review Use subject to the following conditions: 3. The use of the western portion of the site be mainta.iied as a car storage area and that the following improvements be subject to Planning and Zoning Commission approval as a Design Review Application and be completed on or before August 15, 1989: a. The car storage area be adequately regraded, revegetated, and surfaced in a manner appropriate to its use; b. All cars shall be screened from the adjacent private property and public right of ways; 4. The number of cars in the designated car storage area be limited to a maximum of fifteen and the storage of any additional material or debris shall be prohibited; In response to these conditions Les Shapiro, owner of the Mountain Center stated at the May 16th meeting that he already had plans to redesign the existing parking area. The Commission requested that Mr. Shapiro submit drawings and specific information on the proposed improvements and continued the review to the June 6th meeting. Staff Report to the Planning and Zoning Commission June 5, 1989 Lots 26/27, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Jerry's Automotive Repair Special Review Use Re-evaluation Page 2 of 4S On June 1, 1989 the applicant submitted a diagramatic plan, to the Department of Community Development indicating a parking area and berming but 'inadequate topographic and dimensional information was provided to evaluate the proposal. The applicant requested that he be given additional time to provide the needed information and that the item be continued to the June 20, 1989 meeting. Mr. Vekre indicated that this would be an adequate period of time to engage the needed technical assistance and prepare additional drawings. STAFF RECOMMENDATION If the Commission has adequate findings staff recommends continuance of this item til the June 6, 1989 meeting. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Presentation by Applicant 3. Open Continuance of Public Hearing 4. Close Public Hearing 5. Continue Public Hearing and Review to the June 6, 1989 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting. Respectfully �Submi /t I c/lyAl/ ./� L� Fri tzlen " Department of Community Development Staff Report to the Planning and Zoning Commission June 6, 1989 Lots 26/27, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Jerry's Automotive Repair Special Review Use Re-evaluation Page 3 of 3 PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Conditions ( ) Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Date-- (- Denise Hill Secretary rho rnmmiccinn rnntinued this item until t 11 / 11 / 1" 1• i" ". STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION June 6, 1989 Lot 54, Block 3, Wildridge Ptach Residence Single Family Residence Stephen Richards Architect Final Design Review Page 1 of 4 INTRODUCTION Stephen Richards, on behalf of Tom and Cindy Ptach, is requesting final design review for a single family residence located on Lot 54, Block 3, Wildridge. The lot is is located within the Wildridge Specially Planned Area and has two residential developments rights assigned to it. (See exhibit) At the May 16, 1989 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting this project was reviewed on a preliminary basis. Discussion centered on the access and associated retainage. The applicant requested approval of an unpaved driveway. STAFF COMMENTS: 6.10 DESIGN REVIEW CONSIDERATIONS The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of a proposed project: 6.11 THE CONFORMANCE WITH THE ZONING CODE AND OTHER APPLICABLE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE TOWN OF AVON COMMENT. Section 17.24.020 of the Avon Municipal Code states: "All open, off steet parking areas shall be surfaced with asphaltic concrete, concete, or other approved hard surface, which will be constructed and maintained in accord with specifications of town engineering department." The proposed driveway is asphalt from the right of way to the property line and gravel from there to the garage. A gravel drive for this proposal may create problems, particlarly in light of the potential difficulties presented by the steep grades, snow plowing/storage, and emergency vehicle access. 6.12 THE SUITABILITY OF THE IMPROVEMENT, INCLUDING TYPE AND QUALITY OF MATERALS OF WHICH IT IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED AND SITE UPON WHICH IT IS TO BE BUILT. COMMENT: Exterior materials are cedar shakes, wood siding, stucco and river rock. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION June 6, 1989 Lot 54, Block 3, Wildridge Ptach Residence Final Design Review Page 2 of 4 6.13 THE COMPATIBILITY OF THE DESIGN TO MINIMIZE SITE IMPACTS TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES. COMMENT:Retainage is proposed in the public right of way and the driveway drainage runs over the wall and into the roadside swale. It is recommended that drainage be directed back onto the lot and thr: retainage be moved out of the public right of way. 6.14 THE COMPATIBILITY OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS WITH SITE TOPOGRAPHY. COMMENT: The site is large but steeply sloped. There are two frontages to the lot, one being Wildridge Road East the other being North Point Road. Both road frontages are extremely steep and present difficult access design problems. The proposed access is from the lower road. Topographical information and driveway details have been provided since the preceding review. The driveway scales at approximately 200'-0" in length and has been widened from 12' to 16'. Gravel is proposed as the surfacing material. The driveway requires up to 30' in height of retainage. Retainage proposed has three stepped 10'-0" riprap walls with intermediate shelves of landscaping. This treatment is approximately 120' in length. Other siting alternatives were discussed at the previous meeting but it was determined that the location was acceptable as proposed if the retainage were properly designed. 6.15 THE VISUAL APPEARANCE OF ANY PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT AS VIEWED FROM ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND PUBLIC WAYS. COMMENT: The retainage and driveway will have a significant impact on the visual appearance of this project. Revegatation of cut and fill areas are proposed to be native grasses and and sage. New landscaping consists of 21 deciduous trees, aspen and birch, no low landscaping elements are proposed. It is suggested that plant material such as tall shrubs and native ground covers more suited to the microclimate be considered in light of the difficulties that will be encountered with irrigation. Irrigation is not addressed in the application. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION June 6, 1989 Lot 54, Block 3, Wildridge Ptach Residence Final Design Review Page 3 of 4 6.16 THE OBJECTIVE THAT NO IMPROVEMENT BE SO SIMILIAR OR DISSIMILIAR TO OTHERS IN THE VICINITY THAT VALUES, MONETARY OR AESTHETIC WILL BE IMPAIRED. COMMENT: Proposal is unique to the vicinity. 6.17 THE GENERAL CONFORMANCE OF THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS WITH THE ADOPTED GOALS, POLICIES, AND PROGRAMS OF THE TOWN OF AVON. There are no adopted goals for Wildridge. STAFF RECOMMENDATION If the commission has adequate findings staff recommends final design review approval with the followinng conditions: 1. A more throroughly developed landscape plan, subject to commission review, be submitted prior to issuance of building permit. 2. Approval of exterior material samples as presented at the meeting. 3. Approval of exterior lighting specification as presented at the meeting. 4. Engineered drawings for the retainage be submitted with the building permit application. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Presentation by Applicant 3. Consideration by Commission 4. Act on Request Respectfully Submitted, /Lynitzlen Dep tment of � munity Development STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION June 6, 1989 Lot 54, Block 3, Wildridge Ptach Residence Preliminary Design Review Page 4 of 4 PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Conditions ( ) Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Date Denise Hill Secretar�—L(z more thoroughly developed landscape plan be submitted for the staff to review and approve prior to issuance of building Permit,• and 2. Engineered d wings for the retainage be submitted with the building permit • 49, 0, 6E; STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSIO14 June 6, 1989 Lot 2, Filing No. 1, Eaglebend South Harbor Development Tony Seibert Duplex Residence Final Design Review Page 1 of 3 INTRODUCTION Tony Seibert on behalf of South Harbor Development is requesting Final Design Review for a duplex residnece located on Lot 2, Filing No. 1, Eaglebend . The lot is zoned SPA and two residential development rights are assigned to it. This proposal is identical to the proposal approved February 7, 1989 for Lot 7, Filing No. 1. A copy of the February 7, 1989 staff report is included. It is the intent of the owner to construct a single family residence and abandon the previous approval for Lot 7. 6.10 DESIGN REVIEW CONSIDERATIONS The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of a proposed project: 6.11 THE CONFORMANCE WITH THE ZONING CODE AND OTHER APPLICABLE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE TOWN OF AVON COMMENT: Back decks encroach into the required 30'setback from the mean annual high water mark. It is suggested that the decks be redesigned to comply with the requirements. 6.12 THE SUITABILITY OF THE IMPROVEMENT, INCLUDING TYPE AND QUALITY OF MATERALS OF WHICH IT IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED AND SITE UPON WHICH IT IS TO BE BUILT. COMMENT: This proposal similiar but not identical to the duplex appro.ed and now under construction on Lot 12, Filing No. 1. Approval of exterior colors should be based on distinguishing this duplex from its similiar neighbor as well as other applicable design criteria. Previously approved colors were blue and grey and off white stucco. 6.13 THE COMPATIBILITY OF THE DESIGN TO MINIMIZE SITE IMPACTS TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES. COMMENT: There do not appear to be any unusual or significant impacts to adjacent properties. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION June 6, 1969 Lot 2, Filing No. 1, Eaglebend Duplex Residence Final Design Review Page 2 of 3 6.14 THE COMPATIBILITY OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS WITH SITE TOPOGRAPHY. COMMENT: Site is gently sloped and easily accomodates the proposed improvements. Proposed buildings sit primarily behind the beginning of the river bank. 6.15 THE VISUAL APPEARANCE OF ANY PPOPOSED IMPROVEMENT AS VIEWED FROM ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND PUBLIC WAYS. COMMENT: Landscape plan is well developeo and serves to screen parking areas and side elevations from adjacent properties. 6.16 THE OBJECTIVE THAT NO IMPROVEMENT BE SO SIMILIAR OR DISSIMILIAR TO OTHERS IN THE VICINITY THAT VALUES, MONETARY OR AESTHETIC WILL BE IMPAIRED. COMMENT: If the approval for Lot 7, Filing No. 1, Eaglebend remains in place there is the potential that there would be two identical buildings within sight of each other. 6.17 THE GENERAL CONFORMANCE OF FHE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS WITH THE ADOPTED GOALS, POLICIES, AND PROGRAMS OF THE TOWN OF AVON. There are no adopted goals for Eaglebend. STAFF RECOMMENDATION If the Commission has adequate findings approval is recommended conditioned by the following: 1. Approval of material samples as presented at the meeting. 2. Prior to issuance of the building permit revised plans indicating rear decks outside of the applicably setback be submitted. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Presentation by Applicant 3. Consideration by Commission 4. Act on Request STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION June 6, 1989 Lot 2, Filing No. 1, Eaglebend Duplex Residence Final Design Review Page 3 of 3 Respectfully�u¢m' ted, y Fritzlen Department of C mmunity Development PLANNING AND Z011ING ACTION Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Conditions ( ) Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Date- tF_ Denise Hill Secretar The Commission granted final design review approval for Lot 2, Blk 1, Filing 1, Eaglebend duplex residences as submitted. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION June 6, 1989 Lot 18, Filing No. 3, Eaglebend Subdivision Single Family Residence William Loughridge Owner John Rosolak Architect Final Design Review Page 1 of 4 INTRODUCTION John Rosolak on behalf of William Loughridge is requesting Final Design Review for a single family residence located on Lot 18, Filing No. 3, Eaglebend Subdivision. Eaglebend Subdivision is zoned Specially Planned Area. At the March 21, 1989 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting John Appleby and John Loughridge requested a sideyard and frontyard setback variance, in conjunction with a replat of Lots 17 and 18, to allow for two separate residences located within Filing No. 3 commonly known as the Stonebridge Condominiums site. The requested subdivision and variance was subsequently approved by the Town Council. The newly platted Lots 17 and 18 allow for two detached residences with a common driveway rather than the townhouses as originally proposed. On April 4, 1989 the Appleby residence located on Lot 17 received Final Design Review. John Railton architect provided schematics of the proposed site improvements for the development of Lot 17 and 18 at the March 21, 1989 meeting. The proposal being reviewed, designed by John Rosolak for Lot 18 is in accordance with those schematics. STAFF COMMENT 6.10 DESIGN REVIEW CONSIDERATIONS The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of a proposed project: 6.11 THE CONFORMANCE WITH THE ZONING CODE AND OTHER APPLICABLE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE TOWN OF AVON ,~*A Staff Report to the Planning and Zoning Commission June 6, 1989 Lot 18, Filing No. 3, Looughridge Residence Page 2 of 4 Eaglebend Subdivision Final Design Review COMMENT: The application is in conformance with applicable regulations. 6.12 THE SUITABILITY OF THE IMPROVEMENT, INCLUDING TYPE AND QUALITY OF MATERALS OF WHICH IT IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED AND SITE UPON WHICH IT IS TO BE BUILT. COMMENT: The architectural style is contemporary and distinct from Victorian character of Stonobridge Condominiums and the proposal approved on Lot 18. 6.13 THE COMPATIBILITY OF THE DESIGN TO MINIMIZE SITE IMPACTS TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES. COMMENT: Design of the driveway access is integral to the development of Lot 17 on the east. The site plan presented addresses configuration of the driveway access and building location for both Lot 17 and 18. Proposed driveway improvements are located on Tract B, which is common area owned by the Stonebridge Condominium Association. It is suggested that Design Review Approval be contingent upon approval of the Condominium association for the application as submitted. 6.14 THE COMPATIBILITY OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS WITH SITE TOPOGRAPHY. COMMENT: Site and building design incorporate minimal regrading. 6.15 THE VISUAL APPEARANCE OF ANY PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT AS VIEWED FROM ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND PUBLIC WAYS. COMMENT: All elevations of this residence have an equal level of architectural detail and interest. Landscape and site design are well developed. 6.16 THE OBJECTIVE THAT NO IMPROVEMENT BE SO SIMILIAR OR DISSIMILIAR TO OTHERS IN THE VICINITY THAT VALUES, MONETARY OR AESTHETIC WILL BE IMPAIRED. COMMENT: The architectural design is unique to the vicinity. Staff Report to the Planning and Zoning Commission June 6, 1989 Lot 17, Filing No. 3, Eaglebend Subdivision Loughridge Residence Final Design Review Page 3 of 4 6.17 THE GENERAL CONFORMANCE OF THE PROPOSES IMPROVEMENTS WI''iH THE ADOPTED GOALS, POLIO ES, AND PROGRAMS OF THE TOWN OF AVON: There are no applicable goals for Eaglebend. STAFF RECOMMENDATION If the Commission has adequate findings Final Design Review Approval is recommended subject to the following conditions: 1. Any further conditions imposed by the Stonebridge Condominium Association in regard to the design of the driveway access and site improvements on Tract B as presented with the application for Final Design Review. 2. Approval of exterior material samples and proposed lighting as presented at the meeting. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Presentation by Applicant 3. Consideration by Commission 4. Act on Request Respectfully Submitted Lynn�ritzlen Department of Community Development Staff Report to the Planning and Zoning Commission June 6, 1989 Lot 18, Filing No. 3, Eaglebend Subdivision Loughridge Residence Final Design Review Page 4 of 4 PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Conditions ( I Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Date y Denise Hill Secretary_ The Ckmssion granted final design review approval for the Loughri ge residence on Lot 18, Filing 3, Eaglebend as submitted.