PZC Packet 060590STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
June 5, 1990
Lot 63, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision
Bruce and Sue Kelly
Single Family Residence
Final Design Review
INTRODUCTION
Bruce and Sue Kelly are proposing to construct a single
family residence on Lot 63, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision.
Lot 63 is .80 of an acre (34,848 square feet) and the
building footprint is approximately 2,250 square feet for a
building area ratio of 6.5%. The building is approximately
2,500 square feet for a floor area ratio of 6.5%. Maximum
building height is approximately 33 feet (south elevation).
The house is set approximately 95 feet back from the road
(Wildridge Road West), 20 fleet from the west lot line, and 50
feet from the south iot line.
A landscape plan indicating species and size, with a
revegetation plan for disturbed areas, and an irrigation
system is included with the submittal.
The building is a two story building with a gable roof. The
exterior materials are 10" diameter peeled and stained
(silver oak) logs with mortar white' colored chinking. The
house trim (window frames) will be painted arctic white. The
roof materials are grade r, cedar shake shingles. All exposed
foundation areas will be covered with stucco (mortar white).
The applicant would like to leave the driveway in gravel for
a period of 1.5 years to allow for compaction, after which
time the driveway will be asphalted.
STAFF COMMENTS
The Commission shall consider the following items in
reviewing the design of a proposed project:
6.11 - The conformance with the Zoning Code and other
applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon.
COMMENT: This project is in conformance with th-
zoning code and other applicable Town of Avon regulations.
6.12
- The
suitability of the
improvement. including
type and
quality
of materials of
which it is to be
constructed
and the
site upon which it
is to be located.
COMMENT: The exterior materials are hand peeled log,
wood trim and stucco with cedar shake shingles.
• 11
4011
401
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
June 5, 1990
Page 19 of 19
Commission val �` Date
n ek
A
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
June 5, 1990
Lot 63, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision
Bruce and Sue Kelly
Single Family Residence
Final Design Review
INTRODUCTION
Bruce and Sue Kelly are proposing to construct a single
family residence on Lot 63, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivisior.
Lot 63 is .80 of an acre (34,848 square feet) and the
building footprint is approximately 2,250 square feet for a
building area ratio of 5.5%. The building is approximately
2,500 square feet for a floor area ratio of 6.5%. Maximum
building height is approximately 33 feet isouth elevation).
The house is set approxima'-ely 95 feet back from the road
(Wildridge Road West), 20 feet from the west lot line, and 50
feet from the south lot line.
A landscape plan indicating species and size, with a
revegetation plan for disturbed areas, and an irrigation
system is included with the submittal.
The building is a two story building with a gable roof. The
exterior materials are 10" d - .meter peeled and stained
(silver oak) 'logs with 'mortar white" colored chinking. The
house trim (window frames) will be painted arctic white. The
roof materials are grade A cedar shake shingles. All exposed
foundation areas will be covered with stucco (mortar white).
The applicant would like to leave the driveway in gravel for
a period of 1.5 years to allow for compaction, after which
time the driveway will be asphalted.
STAFF COMMENTS
The Commission shall consider the following items in
reviewing the design of a proposed project:
6.11 - The conformance with the Zoning Code and other
applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon.
COMMENT: This project is in conformance witn the
zoning code and other applicable Town of Avon regulations.
6.12 - The suitability of the improvement, including
type and quality of materials of which it is to be
constructed and the site upon which it is to be located.
COMMENT: The exterior materials are hand peeled log,
wood trim and stucco with cedar, shake shingles.
000 ,o 1
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
June 5, 1990
Page 2 of 4
Lot 63, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision
Bruce and Sue Kelly
Single Family Residence
Final Design Review
6.13 - The compatibility of the design to minimize
site impacts to adjacent properties.
COMMENT: The house is sited approximately 95, 20 and
50 feet from the front, west and south property lines
respect-valy. Landscape clusters have been provided around
the entire structure.
6.14 - The compatibility of proposed improvement with
site topography.
COMMENT: The owner has chosen to incorporate a waikout
basement into his building design. The majority of this
portion of the building is below finished grade. The
building appears to work well with the existing topography of
this site.
6.15 - The visual appearance of any proposed
improvement as viewed from adjacent and neighboring
properties and public ways.
COMMENT: The appearance of this residence from
neighboring properties and public ways se -ms acceptable. The
residence will set lower than the surrounding roads and most,
of the adjacent lots in the area.
6.16 - The objective that no improvement be so similar
or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary
or aesthetic will be impaired.
COMMENT: staff sees no conflict with this criteria.
6.17 - The general conformance of the proposed
improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of
the Town of Avon.
COMMENT: The proposal is in general conformance
with adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of the Town of
Avon.
A
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
June 5, 1990
Page 3 of 4
Lot 63, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision
Bruce and Sue Kelly
Single Family Residence
Final Design Review
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of this design review applicatio
with the following conditions:
1.) The driveway entrance must comply with
applicable requirements of the down of Avon.
2.) A more detailed drainage plan be submitted fo
staff review at the time of building perm.t application.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
1. Introduce Application
2. Applicant Presentation
3. Commission Review
4. Commission Action
Respectfully sub,aitted,
Lrt"V
Jim Curnutte
Planner
C
ft
X11, OR%
0"� ^
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNINU ANO ZONING COMMISSION
June 5, 1990
Page 4 of 4
Lot 63, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision
Bruce and Sue Kelly
Single Family Residence
Final Design Review
PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION
Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended
Conditions (`) Approved with Modified Conditions ( )
Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn (
Date 5 `� Terri Jeppson, Secretary_
The Commission granted final design review
Lot 63, Block
Wildridge Subdivision, Kelly single family residence with the conditions
that the driveway entrance must comply with the applicable requirements__
of the Town of Avon and that the driveway be made as wide as possible and
still maintain an acceptable grade on the driveway; and a more de ailed
drainage plan be submitted for staff review at the time of building permit
application.
r
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
June 5, 1990
Lot 38, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision
Ackerman Residence
Design Review
INTRODUCTION
On September 19, 1989, the Planning and Zoning Commiss-on
granted final design approval for a single family residence
on Lot 38, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision.
In March of 1990 the applicant submitted a proposed revision
which included two separate units on the property. The
Planning and Zoning Commission informed the applicant that
unless a rezoning occurred the development of two units would
be required to meet the definition of "duplex".
The applicant may, at a future time, pursue a rezoning or the
property, but at this time is requesting design approval for
a single family house. The house is sited on the western
portion of the lot and is about 2,700 square feet in size,
including garage.
The house is a single story stucco building witn a cedar
shake roof. A grading and landscape plan has been designed
and submitted by the applicant. The residence meets or
exceeds all zoning criteria.
STAFF COMMENTS
The Commission shall consider the foliowing items in
reviewing the design of a proposed project:
6.11 - The conformance with the Zoning Code and other
applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon.
COMMENT: The residence is in conformance with ail Avon
Zoning regulations. The specific driveway oesign must meet
Town of Avon design standards upon issuance of a building
permit.
6.12 - The suitability of the improvement, including
type and quality of materials of which it is to be
constructed e.nd the site upon which it is to be located.
COMMENT: The materials are very similar to the
previously proposed residence. A mushroom color stucco is
the primary building material. The roof material is cedar
shakes.
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
June 5, 1990
Page 2 of 3
Lot 38, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision
Ackerman Residence
Design Review
6.13 - The compatibility of the design to minimize
site impacts to adjacent properties.
COMMENT: The site of this lot allows all impacts of
this grading plan to remain on site. There are no negative
impacts to adjacent properties due to site construction.
6.14 - The compatibility of proposed improvement with
site topography.
COMMENT: The slope of this site is relatively gentle,
yet fairly substantial grading will be required to site this
residence. The applicant's desire to maintain a single story
house, as opposed to a garden level or walkout, is forcing
quite a bit of site work. The staff does not feel that this
approach to building design is compatible with site
topography.
6.15 - The visual appearance of any proposed
improvement as viewed from adjacent and neighboring
properties and public ways.
COMMENT: The arch--tecture and materials of this
structure should be visually compatible with adjacent
properties.
6.16 - The objective that no improvement be so similar
or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary
or aesthetic will be impaired.
COMMENT: Staff sees no conflict with this criteria.
6.17 - The general conformance of the proposed
improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of
the Town of Avon.
COMMENT: The proposal is in general conformance
with adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of the Town of
Avon.
^ 00%
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
June 5, 1990
Page 3 of 3
Lot 38, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision
Ackerman Residence
Design Review
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
This application appears complete.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
1. Introduce Application
2. Applicant Presentation
3. Commission Review
4. Commission Action
Respectfully submitted,
1C.0 L
Rick Pylman
Director of Community Development
PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION
Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended
Conditions ( ) Approved with Modified Conditions ( )
Continued ( V-) Denied l ) withdrawn
Date-(-.5--0)Terri Jeppson, Secretary T�
Int 38 Block 2 Wildridge Subdivision until such time, as designated by
Sl to Work. elevations and a better detailed draw -i na of the site plan.
^
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
June 5, 1990
Lot 3, Block 3,
Valley Business
Design Review
INTRODUCTION
Lot 3, Block
parcel located
Beaver Creek
currently has
Benchmark et Beaver Creek
Center
3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek is a 1.02 acre
on the north east corner of Highway 6 and West
Boulevard. The property is zoned RHDC and
o development rights assigned to it.
On March 20th of this year the Planning and Zoning Commission
granted final design approval to a two story commercial
building. The applicant is requesting a revision to this
previous approval. The request is to separate the uses
proposed into two buildings. The main building, housing the
restaurant and office uses, is sited in relatively the same
position, while the car wash facility has been placed in a
separate free standing building to the west of the
restaurant. The building materials remain essentially the
same as previously approved, with the exception of roof
material. The previously approved material was red cedar
shakes. The applicant is requesting approval of an asphalt
shingle material. All zoning considerations, including
parking, are met by this proposal.
STAFF COMMENTS
The Commission shall consider the following items in
reviewing the design of a proposed project:
6.11 - The conformance with the Zoning Code and other
applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon.
COMMENT: T'iis proposal is in confor,nance with the Town
of Avon Zoning Code.
6.12 - The suitability of the improvement, including
type and quality of materials of which it is to be
constructed and the site upon which it is to be located.
COMMENT: The type and quality of materials, with the
exception of roof material, is unchanged from our previous
review and approval. The applicant's request for a roof
material change should be addressed by the Commission.
6.13 - The compatibility of the design to minimize
site impacts to adjacent properties.
0f;
(")
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
June 5, 1990
Page 2 of 3
•
Lot 3, Block 3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Valley Business Center
Design Review
COMMENT: The building design and associated
landscaping should minimize any visual impacts to adjacent
properties. A drainage plan will be required at .wilding
permit application.
6.14 - The compatibility of proposed improvement with
site topography.
COMMENT: This lot is relatively flat, topography
should not be a factor in this re•-iew.
6.15 - The visual appearance of any proposed
improvement as viewed from adjacent and neighboring
properties and public ways.
COMMENT: The visual appearance of this project appears
satisfactory.
6.16 - The objective that no improvement be so similar
or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary
or aesthetic will be impaired.
COMMENT: Staff sees no conflict with this criteria.
6.17 - The general ccirormance of the proposed
improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of
the Town of Avon.
COMMENT: The proposal is in general conformance
with adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of the Town of
Avon.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff feel this is a complete application.
STAFF REPORT
June 5, 1990
Page 3 of 3
THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
Lot 3, Block 3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Valley Business Center
Design Review
RECOMMENDED ACTION
1. Introduce Application
2. Applicant Presentation
3. Commission Review
4. Commission Action
Respectfully submitted,
Rick Pylman
Director of Community Development
PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION
Approved as u�b1mi ted (rte" Approved with Recommended
Conditions ( ) Approved with Modified Conditions
Continued l ) Denied lam) Withdrawn ( 1
Date
S Terri Jeppson, Secretary C
q-hmitted, as it complicates the traffic flout ;[Ad site PlAn iaa.-Iss'Les—
..
., .. . ..... nrecaltP to
the Commission for final approval
•)
L-
a
r'1
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
June Fi, 1990
Lots 2 -12 and Tract A, Filing 4, Eaglebend Subdivision
Jeff Spanel for Eaglebend Partnership
Eaglebend Apartments
Conceptual Design Review
CHRONOLOGY
Late 1970's - The Eagle County Board of County Commissioners
approved the final plat of `he Eaglebend Subdivision, which
was located in unincorporated Eagle County at the time.
June 10, 1986 - The Avon Town Council approved the Petition
by Eaglebend Partnership for annexation '.nto the Town of
Avon, SPA Zoning of the property and the preliminary plan,
all at the same time. Exhibit B" (Zoning Plat for
Eaglebend) of Ordinance 86-12 established the allowed
densities, uses and zoning criteria (building heights,
setbacks, etc.) for each of the six development areas shown
on the plat.
July 22, 1986 - The Avon Town Council approved the
Subdivision Improvements Agreement and the final plats for
all four filings of the Eaglebend Subdivision. At that time
the approved development plan for Lots 2 - 12 and Tract A,
Filing 4, consisted of a 90 unit hrghrise building (6 stories
of residential over a 2 story covered parking structure),
approximately 13,000 square feet of commercial area, 11-1u
plex buildings, two acres of open space (Tract A), and
recreational amenities (clubhouse, swimming pool, tennis
courts, children's play area, bike path, etc.).
INTRODUCTION
Eaglebend Filing 4 currently includes Lots 1-12, Tracts A & B
and that portion of Eaglebend Drive located west of
Stonebridge Drive. This conceptual review application
involves only Lots 2-12 (development areas I and II) and
Tract A.
Although currently approved for the type of use and density
shown on the recently submitted conceptual plan, the
applicant is proposing to amend the existing SPA for the
purpose of reapportioning the density across the property in
a different manner.
The applicants would like to vacate all interior lot lines to
facilitate the placement of 20 - 12 unit buildings across the
P. Iv� 00' 1001
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
June 5, 1990
Page 2 of 4
Lots 2 -12 and Tract A, Filing 4, Eaglebend Subdivision
Jeff Spanel for Eaglebend Partnership
Eaglebend Apartments
Conceptual Design Review
property for a total of 240 units. There are currently 1.33
development rights assigned to the property, so this will
require normal fractionalization approval.
Upon vacation of interior lot lines, the resulting land area
would total approximately 9.314 acres (including tract A).
The amount of open space remaining after full buildout of
this project is significantly less than the previously
approved plat at approximately 40% (including Tract A).
The buildings are three story wood frame buildings witn
pitched roofs. Exterior walls will be finished with hard
board siding. Roof materials are proposed to be tiberglas
shingles. Each building will include 12 covered parking
spaces, a laundry or storage room and a choice of six
diferent floor plans. Building footprints are approximately
5,000 square feet each and floor area is approximately 8,250
square feet each. Building heights will be about 44, from
finished grade to thepeak of the highest ridgeline. A total
of 397 parking spaces are provided on the property (240
covered).
Two access drives are currently shown entering the property
from Eaglebend Drive. The applicants are considering
relocating one of the drives to Stonebridge Drive.
No landscape plan hk.s been submitted for staff review.
STAFF COMMENTS
The following staff comments are of a conceptual nature and
are based on the plan as submitted. More &atailed staff
comments concerning this proposal will be presented in
conjunction with the Final Design Review, SPA Amendment ane.
Fractionalization application reviews.
- The Eaglebend Apartments are located within Town Subarea
10 (RiverFront District) as described in the Avon
Comprehensive Plan. Design recommendations for this district
include in part:
- Set buildings back from the river to preserve
its natural character.
of
a
a
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING
June 5, 1990
Page 3 of 4
Lots 2 - 12 and Tract A, Filiong 4, Eaglebend Subdivision
Jeff Spanel for Eaglebend Partnership
Eaglebend Apartments
Conceptual Design Review
- Limit building heights to three to tour stories,
use sloped roofs, indingenous materials and
muted colors.
- Design buildings to "step down in height as
they near the river.
- Provide public river access for public enjoy-
ment and encourage the construction of a
recreation trail along the river.
- The existing boundry lines of Tract A should be adjusted
by the applicant as necessary Lo promote efficient site
design and building layout. The final placement of the
adjusted tract line should not preclude the construction of a
future recreation trail along the top of the bank. A minimum
of 15' from the edge of the bank is recommended.
- At 240 dwelling units, the potential population of this
project could ver- well exceed 400 people. Staff would like
to see provisions made for:
- Public Transportation - At least two areas on
the property should be labled "future bus stop".
- Recreational Amen.tie_s - The current plan
includes two volleyball courts and several
charcoal grills. Staff would like the applicant
to consider a community ouilding to provide
some indoor recreational activities during the
winter months. the building could also be used
as an on-site management office. River Run
Apartments, Timber W-1ge Apartments, Eagle
River Mobile Home Pe,k and Benchmark Mobile
Home Park all have community buildings which
are used extensively by their residents.
- Child Care Facilities - If deemed necessary by
the Planning and Zoning Commission, the
applicants should address how they are proposing
to mitigate the increased demand on an already
short supply of child care facilities in the
Avon area.
r •s n n M
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
June 5, 1990
Page 4 of 4
Lots 2 - 12 and Tract A, Filing 4, Eaglebend Subdivision
Jeff Spanel for Eaglebend Partnership
Eaglebend Apartments
Conceptual Desitgn Review
- Internal road widths and turning radii do not appear to be
adequate for fire department vehicles.
- Additional internal fire hydrants must be provided to
assure proper fire protection.
- A fire alarm system will be required per Avon Municipa,
Code.
- More detailed information is necessary to adequately
review proposed site drainage, grading and revegetation,
- Extensive buffering (landscaping and berming) should be
provided along the west property line to minimize the impacts
of this project on the adjacent property.
- Since this is a conceptual design review, no formal action
will be taken by the Commission at this time.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
1. Introduce Application (Staff);
2. Presentation by Applicant;
3. Commission Review/Discussion;
Respectfully submitted,
Jim ^urnutte
Planner
00� vj
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISbIJIN
June 5, 1990
Lots 7, 11, 70, 71, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision
Marvin Simon for M. B. S. Development Corporation
Wildridge SPA Plan Amendment and Special Review Use to
Transfer Two Residential Development Rights
INTRODUCTION
Marvin Simon is proposing to transfer one residential
development right from Lot 7 to Lot 70 and one residential
development right from Lot 11 to Lot 71, all in Block 4,
Wildridge Subdivision. Each of these lots currently has two
residential development rights assigned to it.
In order to accomplish this density transfer, the applicant
must receive approvals of both an SPA Amendment/Zone change
application and a Special Review Use application.
Lot 7 (5762 Wildridge Road East) and Lot 11 (5720 Wildridge
Road East) are 1.46 acres (63,598 square feet) and .95 of an
acre (41,382 square feet) respectively. Approximately 1/3 of
each of these lots is platted as "non -developable area". The
average slope of both of these lots appears to be
approximately 25-30%.
Lot 70 (5391 Ferret Lane) and Lot 71 (5380 Ferret Lane) are
.89 of an acre (38,768 square feet) and .53 of an acre
(23,087 square feet.) respectively. The average slopes of
these lots appears to be of approximately 20%.
STAFF COMMENTS
In considering the suitability of the special review use, the
Avon Planning and Zoning Commission and Town Council shall
determine the following:
1. Whether the proposed use othc-rwise complies with all
requirements imposed by the zoning code.
COMMENT: All four of the subject lots are
currently undeveloped and in compliance with the Avon Zoning
Code.
2. Whether the proposed use is consistent with the
objectives and purposes of the zoning code and the applicable
zoning district.
COMMENT: The proposed transfer would occur totally
M
•
a
e-51 1 d 3 h
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
June 5, 1990
Page 2 of 4
Lots 7, 11, 70, 71, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision
Marvin Simon for M.B.S. Development Corporation
Wildridge SPA Plan Amendment and Special Review Use to
Transfer Two Residential Development Rights
within Block 4 of the Wildridge Subdivision and therefore
would not change the previously approved density for the
area. The proposal would however, introduce triplex zoning
into an area surrounded by duplex zoned lots. The entirety
of Block 4 is presently comprised of 2 single family lots, 78
duplex lots, 3 triplex lots, 3 fourplex lots, and two open
space tracts.
3. Whether the proposed use is designed to be compatible
with surrounding land uses and uses in the area.
COMMENT: Due to the relative steepness of LoLs 7
and 11, the proposed density transfer would appear to be
beneficial to the area north of Wildridge Road East, by
rezoning the lots to single family. Rezoning Lots 70 and 71
to triplex, however, would not appear to be compatible with
surrounding uses. Lots 70 and 71 are located in an area
zoned duplex in a;l directions for at least 300-400 feet.
If lots 70 and 71 were to receive a third residential
development right each, they would then have the capability
of being fractionalized and therefore up to 7 residential
units could theroretically be built on each lot. Lots with 2
development rights or less assigned to them cannot be
fractionalized.
Not enough detail of intended use of the lots has been
provided for staff to determine whether or not there is
sufficient lot area necessary for efficient site development
vehicular circulation on these proposed multi -unit lots.
The applicant has indicated that his intended use of lots 70
and 71 would ultimately result in 6 single family dwelling
units on the combined area of the two lot rather than the
construction of two triplex buildings or a fractionalized
project on the property. If indeed, the applicant is
requesting this density transfer for the sole purpose of
resubdividing lots 70 and 71 into six single family lots,
additional information should be provided to show the
feasibility and compatibility of such a proposal.
olft9 oft� P-'� el
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
June 5, 1990
Page 3 of 4
Lots 7, 11, 70, 71, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision
Marvin Simon for M.B.S. Development Corporation
Wildridge SPA Plan Amenvment and Special Review Use to
Transfer Two Residential Development Rights
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
If it is the applicants intention to simply transfer these
development rights for the purpose of constructing triplex
buildings or a fractionalized project on lots 70 and 71, or
selling the lots to others for that purpose, staff would
recommend denial of the SPA Amendment and Special Review Use
applications.
If on the other hand, the applicant is only interested in
transferring density on to lots 70 and 71 for the purpose of
resubdividing the property into 6 single family lots, staff
would recommend that no action be taken on the SPA Amendment
or the Special Review Use applications until such time that a
site specific development plan is reviewed and approved in
conjunction with said applications.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
1. Introduce Application (Staff);
2. Presentation by Applicant;
3. Open Public Hearing
4. Close Public Hearing
5. Commission Review/Discussion;
6. Comm.ssion Action.
Respectfully submitted,
Jlr-„
Jim Curnutte
Planner
P'+
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
June 5, 1990
Page 4 of 4
Lots 7, 11, 70, 71, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision
Marvin Simon for M.B.S. Development Corporation
Wildridge SPA Plan Amendment and Special Review Use to
Transfer Two Residential Development Rights
PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION
Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended
Conditions ( ) Approved with Modified Conditions ( )
Continued (✓ ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( )
Date (0— S q o Terri Jeppson, Secretary
•- •• 61 I. 11- •. �- .•� ..•
n
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
June 5, 1990
Lot 67 & 68, Block
City Market Entry
Design Review
INTRODUCTION
2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
City Market Inc. intends on carrying ouL a major exteri':r
renovation and 15,000 square foot addition to the store
located on Lots 67 & 68, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek.
The master plan for this project includes realignment of
entry drives, new parking lot �urfacing, new parking
configurations, additions to the nor+,h and south sides, a new
entry and a new sign program. This portion of that plan is a
request for final approval of the new entrance architecture.
The remainder of the oroJect will receive final approval at
another time.
The new entry consists of a 576 square foot expansion with
new roof and window forms. Materials consist of split face
block, block and metal AEP roofing. The windows will match
existing.
STAFF COMMENTS
The Commission shall consider the following items in
reviewing the design of a proposed project:
6.11 - The conformance with the Zoning Code and other
applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon.
COMMENT: The new entry is in compliance with all Town
of Avon rules and regulations. Although the overall plan for
redevelopment will require careful scrutiny with regard to
development standards, the entry creates no unusual
conditions.
6.12 - The suitability of the improvement, including
type and quality of materials of which it is to be
constructed and the site upon which it is to be located.
COMMENT: The type and quality of materials is suitable
with existing building materials as well as neighboring
developments. The Staff would recommend that the roof color
be chosen with care.
6.11 - The compatibility of the design to minimize
site impacts to adjacent properties.
P" O
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
,lune 5, 1990
Page 2 of 3
COMMENT: As review of the new entry architecture only,
there is no impact to this criteria.
6.14 - The compatibility of proposed imp ovement with
site topography.
COMMENT: No impact.
6.15 - The visual appearance of any proposed
improvement as viewed from adjacent and neighboring
properties and public ways.
COMMENT: The new entry appears to be a significant
visual and functional improvement to the existing conditions.
6.16 - The objective that no improvement be so similar
or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary
or aesthetic will be impaired.
COMMENT: Staff sees no conflict with this criteria.
6.17 - The general conformance of the proposed
improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of
the Town of Avon.
COMMENT: The proposal is it, general conformance
with adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of the Town of
Avon.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Review color samples, including roof material.
r' -ON
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
June 5, 1990
Page 3 of 3
Lots 67 & 68, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek.
City Market Entry
Design Review
RECOMMENDED ACTION
1. Introduce Application
2. Applicant Presentation
3. Cc-mmission Review
4. Commission Action
Respectfully submitted,
Rick Pylman
Director of Community Development
PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION
Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended
Conditions ( ) Approved with Modified Conditions ( )
Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( )
Date )-5- o Terri Jeppson, Secretary__ _
The Commission granted final design approval to Lo 7/ 8ffBlock 2, __,_
Benchmark at Beaver Creek, City Market entry way and metal roof only.
a
r:
41
a
41