PZC Packet 121890'-%� #',i
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
DECEMBER 18, 1990
Lot 5, Wildridge Acres Subdivision
Steve Riden for Bob Kedrowski
Dubois Single Family Residence
Final Design Review
Continued From December 4, 1990
INTRODUCTION
At the Design Review Board meeting of December 4,1990, this
application was continued until December 18, 1990, in order
to allow the applicant time to provide additional
information. The following items were discussed at the
November 20, 1990 meeting:
- The proposed landscape plan was not considered complete
enough for final design review approval. A more detailed
plan is required which reflects a more formal landscape
treatment around the houses, tapering off to a more natural
appearance away from the house. Native grass seed should be
used to revegetate the disturbed areas instead of kentuc:ky
bluegrass (outside of sodded area). Top soil should be
brought into all sites. The addition of large rocks was
suggested, especially along the west side of this house.
- The roof form should be changed to prevant snow and water
from shedding on the entryway and possibly garage entrance.
The addition of a hip roof should be considered.
- The applicant should consider introducing more siding and
less stucco, or vice versa, to make the residences look
different from the others, rather than just using the roof
forms to make the difference.
- A change in the direction of the siding was suggested.
- The use of semi -transparent stains is preferable to solid
body stains.
Revised plans have been submitted for review, and it appears
that the applicant has adequately addressed the concerns
raised by the Design Review Board at their November 20, 1990,
meeting.
Respectfully submitted,
Jim Curnutte
Planner
� r
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
DECEMBER 18, 1990
Page 2 of 2
Lot 5, Wildridge Acres Subdivision
Steve Riden for Bob Kedrowski
Dubois Single Family Residence
Final Design Review
Continued from December 4, 1990
PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION
Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended
Conditions (V') Approved with Modified Conditions ( )
Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( )
Date--k9-I t Clayton McRory, Secretary_
The Commissi
ranted final design review
h the condi
that the size of caliper and height of the proposed landscaping be
increased by one foot.
i
"., n+4
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
DECEMBER 18, 1990
Lot 9, Wildridge Acres Subdivision
Steve Riden for Bob Kedrowski
Huntoon Single Family Residence
Final Design Review
Continued From December 4, 1990
INTRODUCTION
At the Design Review Board meeting of December 4,1990, this
application was continued until December 18, 1990, in order
to allow the applicant time to provide additional
information. The following items were discussed at the
November 20, 1990 meeting:
- There were concerns about the shedding of snow and water
onto the entryway. It was suggested that the entry would
benefit from the addition of a gable roof form.
- The two doors which access the 2nd floor deck, as seen on
the south elevation, should be brought together, lowever, if
the owner really wants the doors to be separated, then the
windows above them should be combined.
- The applicant should present a comprehensive color scheme
for the entire subdivision. All colors to be used in the
subdivision (stucco, siding, trim, etc.) should be reviewed
and approved at the next meeting.
- The Commission felt that a smaller scale overall site plan
showing all building roof lines, should be presented at the
next meeting.
Revised plans have been submitted for review, and it appears
that the applicant has adequately addressed the concerns
raised by the Design Review Board at their November 20, 1990,
meeting.
Respectfully submitted,
Jim Curnutte
Planner
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ?ONING COMMISSION
DECEMBER 18, 1990
Page 2 of 2
Lot 9, Wildridge Acres Subdivision
Steve Riden for Bob Kedrowski
Huntoon Single Family Residence
Final Design Review
Continued from December 4, 1990
PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION
Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended
Conditions ( V11) Approved with Modified Conditions ( )
Continued( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( )
Date IZ -V6-Q-D Clayton McRory, Secretary
Th fomg�miccinn 9ranta�i fi al ri cin +a,., '.;ion
that the size of caliper and height of the proposed landscaping be
increased by one foot.
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
DECEMBER 18, 1990
Lot 10, Wildridge Acres Subdivision
Steve Riden for Bob Kedrowski
Vest Single Family Residence
Final Design Review
Continued From December 4, 1990
INTRODUCTION
At the Design Review Board meeting of December 4,1990, this
application was continued until December 18, 1990, ir, order
to allow the applicant time to provide additional
information. The following items were discussed at the
November 20, 1990 meeting:
- The introduction of stone to Lot 10 is interesting, but
needs to be estended horizontally under the window and taken
around the corner of the building.
- The third story door should be better lined up with the
doors on levels one and two.
- The rear elevation of the building is a rather long blank
plane. The garage should be offset a few feet to provide
some relief.
Revised plans have been submitted for review, and it appears
that the applicant has adequately addressed the concerns
raised by the Design Review Board at their November 20, 1990,
meeting.
Respectfully submitted,
Jim Curnutte
Planner
.I
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
DECEMBER 18, 1990
Page 2 of 2
Lot 10, Wildridge Acres Subdivision
Steve Riden for Bob Kedrowski
Vest Single Family Residence
Final Design Review
Continued from December 4, 1990
PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION
Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended
Conditions ( ) Approved with Modified Conditions ( )
Continued ( ) 9enied ( ) Withdrawn ( )
i
Date 1 v'l 9— `l0 Clayton McRory, Secretary
The Commission granted final desicn rQyi ew approval
that the height of the trees he increased by nna font anri that a windnW
��be added to the_---
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
DECEMBER 18, 1990
Lot 89, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision
Ken Sortland for Deer Ridge
Resubmittal of Landscape Plan
Design Review
INTRODUCTION
At the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing of June 19,
1990, Mr. Sortland received final design approval for three
duplex buildings on Lot 89, Block 1, Wiidridge Subdivision.
The Commission's approval was granted with the following
conditions:
1. Revisions to the driveway to the middle unit as
specified.
2. The chimney details lowered to the ground and moved off
of the corner.
3. The landscaping be excluded from this approval and to be
brought back.
4. Woodruff shingles to be used.
5. All the above revisions to be brought back prior to
issuance of building permit.
On August 21, 1990, the following action was taken regarding
this application:
"The commission granted approval of the presented driveway
plan; stated that the trash enclosure must remain in the
original location; accepted the relocation of the chimneys;
and stated that the final approval of the landscaping be
tabled, subject to the submittal of a detailed plan designed
by a landscape architect; that the tabling would not delay
the issuance of a building permit; that final approval of the
landscape plan be in place before a temporary certificate of
occupancy will be issuec."
A new landscape plan has been submitted for review. This
plan was prepared by Richard Matthews and Assoc. Staff
offers the following comments regarding the new landscape
plan.
1.1 The plan itself appears to be suitable for this project.
(species type, location, size, etc.), however, all planting
materials north of the driveway have been removed, with the
exception of grass/sage mix.
2. The applicant is not proposing an automatic irrigation
system.
3. The common trash disposal area has been deleted in favor
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
December 18, 1990
Page 2 of 2
Lot 89, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision
Ken Sortland for Deer Ridge
Resubmittal of Landscape Plan
Design Review
of individual home garbage can pickup. The applicant has
stated that BFI has agreed to this particular garbage
disposal arrangement.
4. The project entrance sign is still located within the 10'
front yard setback area required by the Avon Sign Code. The
shape of the sign appears to be different from the one shown
on previous drawings, however, no new information is
provided.
Respectfully submitted,
) , Qn'r
Jim Curnutte
Planner
PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION
Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended
Conditions ( V ) Approved with Modified Conditions ( )
Continued ( ) Denied ( ) withdrawn ( )
Date_ ��-I� �C� Clayton McRory, Secretary
SEE ATTACHED SHEET
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
December 18, 1990
Lot 18, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision
Mark Donaldson for Greg Kraft
Wild lower Condominiums
Fractionalization of Development Rights
Public Hearing
INTRODUCTION
Mark Donaldson, on behalf of Greg Kraft, is requesting
approval of a Fractionalized Project on Lot 18, Block 1,
Wildridge Subdivision. A request for Final Design Review
approval has also been submitted in conjunction with this
project. The lot currently has four (4) Residential
Development Rights assigned to it. If approved, this
fractionalization will result in the creation of eight (8)
dwelling units on the property.
On September 2, 1986, the Avon Planning and Zoning Commission
granted final design review and fractionalization approval,
with conditions, to the Wildflower Condominium project. On
November 17, 1986, after revision of the plan to satisfy the
approval conditions, a building permit was issued for Phase I
(one (1) four unit building) of the project. Due to lack of
progress on the building, the previously approved building
permit, design review and fractionalization approvals have
expired. In November, 1990, the unfinished/abandoned portion
of the building was demolished and the site was restored to
its natural condition.
The proposed development is nearly identical to that
originally approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission in
1986. The new plans show that the windows on the south and
west walls of the third story "mechanical room" have been
deleted.
The proposed project consists of two buildings, each
containing four two bedroom units. All units are 799 square
feet in size (1/2 of a development right each) and are layed
out in two different floor plans. The residential portion of
the buildings is located on the 2nd and 3rd levels with 5
parking garages and some storage areas located on the first
floor. Each building contains a common meeting room (2nd
floor) and mechanical room (3rd floor). Each unit contains a
gas fireplace.
The Planning and Zoning Commission acts on fractionalization
requests in conjunction with Final Design Review. A public
hearing is held on each request for fractionalization of
development rights. The Planning and Zoning Commission may
prescribe appropriate conditions and safeguards to mitigate
impacts related to proposed fractionalization.
STAFF REPORT
December 18,
Page 2 of 4
TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
1990
Lot 18, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision
Mark Donaldson for Greg Kraft
Wildflower Condominiums
Fractionalization of Development Rights
Public Hearing
STAFF COMMENTS
The Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider the
following factors in addition to the Design Review Guidelines
listed in Section 6.00 of the Design Procedures, Rules and
Regulations for the Planning and Zoning Commission of the
Town of Avon when reviewing a project involving the
fractionalization of residential development rights:
1. The adequacy of access to the site with respect to the
width of the adjacent streets, their grades, intersection
safety, visibility and entrance into the lot to be developed.
COMMENT: Access to the site appears to be adequate
to serve eight units. The driveway will be required to meet
Town of Avon driveway/entrance standards.
2. The need for, and availability of public or private
transportation to serve the proposed development;
COMMENT: Public transportation is a desirable
goal for all potions of the Town of Avon. The character of
this project, however, will not necessitate the construction
of public or private transportation facilities.
3. The impact of the proposed project upon public and
private services and facilities serving the area;
COMMENT: There does not appear to be any
definable impact to public or private services that are a
result of this fractionalization request.
4. The compatibility of the proposed unit sizes and unit
mix with existing and potential development in the vicinity;
COMMENT: The proposed project appears to be
compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. This project
was originally found to be compatible with the surrounding
area in 1986.
The two bedroom units would serve to address some of the
needs identified in the recent Housing Needs Assessment
completed by the Eagle County Affordable Housing Task Force.
a
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
December 18, 1990
Page 3 of 4
Lot 18, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision
Mark Donaldson for Greg Kraft
Wildflower Condominiums
Fractionalization of Development Rights
Public Hearing
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommendation is for approval. The lot is situated in
a multi -family neighborhood and the unit mix is appropriate
to both the site and the community.
The recent Housing Needs Assessment identified the need for
an additional 800 units within the valley. These units will
make a positive contribution to ':he community, while the
scale of the proposal eliminates any negative impacts.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
1. Introduce Application
2. Presentation by Applicant;
3. Open Public Hearing for Fractionalization
4. Close Public Hearing
5. Consideration by Commission
6. Act on Request
Respectfully submitted,
Jim Curnutte
Planner
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
December 18, 1990
Page 4 of 4
Lot 18, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision
Mark Donaldson for Greg Kraft
Wildflower Condominiums
Fractionalization of Development Rights
Public Hearing
PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION
Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended
Conditions ( ) Approved with Modified Conditions ( )
Continued( c) Denied ( A Withdrawn ( )
Date IZ-(g— lC Clayton McRory, Secretary
The Commission denied the fractionalization request, citing the
incompatibility of thos project with the surrounding development.
•I
�I
001
•1
-11% 100%�
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
December 18, 1990
Lot 18, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision
Mark Donaldson for Greg Kraft
Wildflower Condominiums
Final Design Review
INTRODUCTION
Mark Donaldson, on behalf of Greg Kraft, is proposing to
construct a multi -family project on Lot 18, Block 1,
Wildridge Subdivision. Lot 18 is .71 of an acre (30,928
square feet) in size and the combined buildings coverage is
approximately 4,400 square feet for a building area ratio of
approximately 14%. The combined floor area of the buildings
is 3,392 square feet for a ratio of 11%. Nearly 1/2 of the
lot area, or approximately 15,000 square feet is covered with
impervious materials. The maximum building height is 35 feet
from finished grade to the highest ridgeline.
A landscape plan indicating plant species and size has been
provided. The irrigation system as indicated on the Flans
will be underground and automatic. Project signing is
located on the east elevation of the building (2' x 9'). No
information has been provided regarding proposed color,
materials, lighting, etc. of this sign.
The building is A three story wood frame building with a
gable roof. Exterior building materials include wood siding
(1" x 6" T & G smooth cedar), cedar shingles, clad windows
and round metal deck railing. Twenty-three parking spaces
are provided on the lot (19 required) including 10 garages.
Outside parking and access areas will be covered with
asphalt.
Color and material samples of all building materials will be
presented at the meeting.
STAFF COMMENTS
The Commission shall consider the following items in
reviewing the design of a proposed project:
6.11 - The conformance with the Zoning Code and other
applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon.
COMMENT: The proposal will be in conformance with the
Town of Avon Zoning requirements, provided that the
accompanying application for fractionalization is approved by
the Avon Planning and Zoning Commission.
6.12 - The suitability of the improvement, incliding
type and quality of materials of which it is to be
__N AWN r")
STAFF REPORT
December 18,
Page 2 of 4
TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
1990
Lot 18, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision
Mark Donaldson for Greg Kraft
Wildflower Condominiums
Final Design Review
constructed and the site upon which it is to be located.
COMMENT: The type and quality of both building and
landscape materials are consistent with Town standards for
multi -unit residential structures. The addition of landscape
materials along the north and west property lines would be
mutually be eficial to residents and surrounding property
owners.
6.13 - The compatibility of the design to minimize
site impacts to adjacent properties.
COMMENT: The siting of the building is sympathetic to
the adjacent residential property. The design of the
building does not appear to adversely effect the distribution
of light and air of adjacent properties.
6.14 - The compatibility of proposed improvement with
site topography.
COMMENT: The property slopes toward the southwest at
approximately 6%. The lower (garage and storage) portion of
the building has been designed to be partially below finished
grade. All grading will be contained within lot lines.
6.15 - The visual appearance of any proposed
improvement as viewed from adjacent and neighboring
properties and public ways.
COMMENT: The appearance of this residence from
neighboring properties and public ways seems acceptable. The
proposed improvement does not inhibit principal views nor
block the solar exposure of adjacent and neighboring
properties. It appears that the proposed landscaping will
have an acceptable visual appearance as viewed from
surrounding areas.
6.16 - The objective that no impro,lement be so similar
or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary
or aesthetic will be impaired.
COMMENT: The mass of the proposed buildings appear to
be consistent with the two and three story structures on
adjacent properties. Unit size and mix is also consistent
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
December 18, 1990
Page 3 of 4
Lot 18, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision
Mark Donaldson for Greg Kraft
Wildflower condominiums
Final Design Review
with existing development in the neighborhood. Exterior
materials are similar to those in the vicinity.
6.17 - The general conformance of the proposed
improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of
the Town of Avon.
COMMENT: The proposal is in general conformance with
adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of the Town of Avon.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff feels that this is a complete application and
recommends approval with the following conditions:
1. The fractionalization requested in conjunction with this
application be approved.
2. Project signage be discussed and approved by the Planning
and Zoning Commission.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
1. Introduce Application
2. Applicant Presentation
3. Commission Review
4. Commission Action
Respectfully submitted,
l�c.�r�✓� �c 4 )
Jim Curnutte
Planner
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
December 18, 1990
Page 4 of 4
Mark Donaldson for Greg Kraft
Wildflower Condominiums
Final Design Review
PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION
Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended
Conditions ( ) Approved with Modified Conditions ( )
Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Witndrawn (t✓
Date 1Z -U3-q0 Clayton McRorv, Secretary
This item was not discussed since the request for fractionalization was
donitpH
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
December 18, 1990
Lot 69, Block 2, Benchmark At Beaver Creek
Mike Trujillo for Domino's Pizza
Sign Variance and Design Review
INTRODUCTION
Mike Trujillo, representing Domino's Pizza, is requesting a
Sign Variance and Design Review approval to allow for the
placement of a sign which is not in conformance witn the
approved sign program on lot 69, block 2, Benchmark
Subdivision.
The approved sign program for the building limits the tenant
identification signs to 20 square feet. Individual letters
(6" to 18" high) are to be mounted on a painted (white) steel
mesh backing. The individual letters must be cast aluminum
with a baked enamel finish. The letters must be the same
color as the corresponding tower color (blue or green). The
painted steel mesh backing is to be located in the building
tower openings. Store #5 (Domino's space) may split their 20
square feet of sign allowance between the two available
frontages (north and east). All signs are to be indirectly
illuminated by the existing suspended spot lights.
The proposed Domino's sign(s) would be an internally lit
metal box sign with a plexiglass face. Sign colors are
proposed to be black, white, red and blue. Although the
applicant has provided several alternatives for identifying
their business, their preference is for a 2'X 8' Domino's
Pizza sign and a 3'X 3' Domino's Pizza logo (25 square feet).
These signs would be located in the northern most tower
opening.
Section 15.26.080 (O,1) of the Avon Sign Code states " Sign
programs shall be compatible with the site and building, and
should provide for a similarity of types, sizes, styles, and
materials for signs within a projact."
All three of the applicants proposed sign alternatives differ
from the approved sign program in type, size, style,
materials and color.
The following variance procedure must be followed for
reviewing a variance request as per Section 15.28.090.
2. APPROVAL CRITERIA: Before acting on a variance request,
the Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider the
following factors:
^.N 01
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
December 18, 1990
Page 2 of 4
Lot 69, Block 2, Benchmark At Beaver Creek
Mike Trujillo for Domino's Pizza
Sign Variance and Design Review
A. The relationship of the requested variance to
existing and potential uses and structures in the vicinity.
COMMENT: Other than the proposed location, the
applicants proposed signing bears no relationship to the
existing or potential signs on the building. If approved,
aesthetic values may be impaired since the design theme for
the sign program will not being carried out. The prop::oed
metal box signs do not seem to relate very well with the
strong architectural form of the building. In addition, the
back side of the boxes would be highly visible to people
viewing the building from the east.
B. The degree to which relief from the strict or
literal interpretation and enforcement of a specified
regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and
uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity.
COMMENT: The degree to which the applicant has
requested relief from the strict provisions of the sign
program appears to be excessive in order to relieve their
perceived hardship. The Domino's Pizza brochure indicates
that it is possible for franchisees to order blue individual
letters. Since the sign program for the building allows the
letters to be up to 1.5 feet high they should be easily
visible from East Beaver Creek Blvd.
C. Such other factors and criteria as the
Commission deems applicable to the requested variance.
COMMENT: Staff has no further comment.
3. FINDINGS REQUIRED: The Planning and Zoning Commission
shall make the following findings before granting a variance:
A. That the granting of the variance will not
constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the
limitations on other properties in the vicinity.
B. That the variance is warranted for one or more
of the following reasons:
i. The strict or literal interpretation
and enforcement of the regulation would result in practical
difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with
the objectives of this title;
STAFF REPORT
December 18,
Page 3 of 4
Lot 69, Block
Mike Trujillo
Sign Variance
extraordinary
site of the
properties in
TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
1990
2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
for Domino's Pizza
and Design Review
ii. There are exceptional or
circumstances or conditions applicable to the
variance that do not apply generally to other
the vicinity;
iii. The strict or literal interpretation
and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the
applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other
properties in the vicinity.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
It would appear that strict
the sign program would not
and unnecessary hardship
recommendation is for denial
RECOMMENDED ACTION
1. Introduce Application
2. Applicant Presentation
3. Commission Review
4. Commission Action
Respectfully submitted,
c�
Jim Curnutte
Planner
compliance with the provisions of
result in a practical difficulty
for Domino's Pizza. Staff
of the variance request.
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
December 18, 1990
Page 4 of 4
Lot 69, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Mike Trujillo for Domino's Pizza
Sign Variance and Desigr Review
PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION
Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended
conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( )
Continued ( pp) Denied ( ✓)/ Withdrawn ( )1/�Jln'
Date 1Z J g lV Clayton McRory, Secretary
The Commission denied the sign variance request, citing the finding at
the strict compliance with the sign program would not result in a
practical difficulty and unnecessary hardship for Domino's Pizza_