Loading...
PZC Packet 110591STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION November 5, 1991 Lot 27, Block 2, Wildridge Michael Sanner Duplex Building Color Change INTRODUCTION Michael Sanner has requested design review to change the color of his duplex located on Lot 27, Block 2, Wildridge. Mr. Sanner is the owner of both sides of the duplex. The building is currently stained with a redwood colored semi -transparent stain. Mr. Sanner wishes to change the color of the building to navajo white with a grey trim. The applicant intends to use a solid color Olympic stain. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Review and discussion of proposed building color change. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Presentation of Application 2. Applicant's Presentation 5. Commission Review 6. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Jim Curnutte Town Planner PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION/ Approved as submitted (lam Approved with Recommended Conditic.ns ( ) Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn Date Patti Dixon, Secrf7 The Commission approved the color change as sibmitted. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION November 5, 1991 Lot 17, Block 2, Wildriege Stonebriar Townhomes Mark Harrison for Sandstone Final Design Review INTRODUCTION Subdivision Development Corp. Mark Harrison, on behalf of Sandstone Development Corporation, is requesting final design review of a proposed fourplex building (Stonebriar Townhomes) on Lot 17, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision. Lot 17 is 0.66 of an acre (28,750 sq. ft.) and is located on the west side of June Creek Trail. The lot has a moderate grade (5-10%), which slopes toward the northwest. The building will house one three bedroom unit and three two bedroom units. Each unit has a one car garage anti a gas fireplace. The maximum building height is 28 feat above finished grade. Exterior building materials include 6' smooth wood composition siding, asphalt shingles, and double pane wood clad windows. The driveway and two requ7red guest parking spaces will be finished with asphalt. The applicant wishes to use the Certainteed "Independence' Shangle on the root. This product will weigh at least 300 lbs per square. The proposed color is "Weathered Wood". A sample of the shingle as well as a color rendering of the building will be presented ,it the meeting. A grading and drainage plan and a landscape Flan have been submitted for the Commission's review. Unfortunately, some last minute changes to the grading plan were not carried over to the landscape plan (closing the second entrance and moving the guest parking area). The applicant has agreed to revise the landscape plan prior to applying for a building permit. The landscape plan indicates that all disturbed areas will be revegetated with either sod or a native grass mixture. The sod areas of the lot will be watered by an automatic sprinkler system and a drip system will be provided to areas outside the sprinkler system. STAFF COMMENTS The Commission shall consider the following items It reviewing the design of a proposed project: STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION November 5, 1991 Page 2 of 4 Lot 17, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision Stonebriar Townhomes Mark Harrison for Sandstone Development Corp. Final Design Review 6.11 - The conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. COMMENT: This proposal is in conformance with toe Avon Zoning Code and other applicable rules and regulations of the Town. This lot is zoned fourplex and that is exactly what the applicant is proposing to build. 6.12 - The suitability of the improvement, including type and quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located. COMMENT: The type and quality of both building and landscaping materials are suitable with Town guidelines. The The Commission recently decided to allow asphalt shingles if they meet certain weight, color and texture specifications. The proposed shingles have been approved on other projects in Wildridge. 6.13 - The compatibility of the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties. COMMENT: The siting and landscaping of the building is sympathetic to the adjacent residential property. All grading will be contained within lot lines. The architecture of the building would not appear to have any definable negative impact on the surrounding community. 6.11 - The compatibility of proposed improvement with site topography. COMMENT: This project appears to have been designed compatibly with existing site topography. The living level of these units is approximately 3.5" below the elevation of June Creek Trail. All units will have unfinished walkout basements. 6.15 - The visual appearance of any proposed improvement as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. COMMENT: The appearance of this residence from neighboring properties and public ways seems acceptable. As STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION November 5, 1991 Page 3 of 4 Lot 17, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision Stonebriar Townhomes Mark Harrison for Sandstone Development Corp. Final Design Review mentioned previously, a landscape plan has been provided, but does not currently match the grading plan. 6.16 - The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. COMMENT: Staff sees no conflict with this criteria. 6.17 - The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of the Town of Avon. COMMENT: This proposal is in general conformance with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of the Town of Avon, with the exception that the driveway grade out in the public right-of-way appears to exceed 4%. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of this design review application with the following conditions: 1. The landscape plan must be amended to match the grading/drainage plan. The landscaoe plan should also describe what plants will be planed in the 'planting areas'. 2. The grading and drainage plan must be amended to show that the driveway grade within the public right-ot-way does not exceed 4%. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION November 5, 1991 Page 4 of 4 Lot 17, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision Stonebriar Townhomes Mark Harrison for Sandstone Development Corp. Final Baa ign Review Respectfully submitted, /'�� CWXA'� Jim Curnutte Town Planner PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions (Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdr r Date Patti Dixon, Secretary The Commission granted final design approval to Lot 17, Block 2, Storebriar Townhomes, with the condition that the landscaping/grading and drainage will be approved by Staff and that the landscaping plan include the ect si ', ?ON STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION November 5, 1991 Lot 5, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision cooper Single Family Residence Final Design Review INTRODUCTION Casey Cooper is requesting final design review of a proposed single family residence on Lot 5, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision. Lot 5 is .685 of an acre (29,839 square feet), however, the actual buildable portion of the lot is approximately half of the total lot area. The western part of the lot has a 20' high knoll on it before dropping off steeply (60%) into a natural drainage. The proposed residence is one story (28' high) in order to reduce the building's profile as viewed from surrounding properties. In order to achieve the proper driveway grade (10% maximum) the owner has opted to utilize a detached garage. However, due to budgetary constraints, Mr. Cooper is not proposing to construct the garage at this time. Mr. Cooper understands that he will need to come back to the Commission for design review of the garage. The building's exterior materials include 1" x 8" shiplap horizontal cedar siding, wood clad insulated casement windows and cedar shingles. All portions of the building siding will be treated with a semi -transparent stain. The driveway will be finished with asphalt. A grading and drainage and a landscape plan have been presented for the Commission's review. Unfortunately, at the time of submittal, the grading/drainage plan did not match the accompanying landscape plan. The boulder retaining wall and rock lined stairway between the house and parking area is not reflected on the grading/drainage plan. Although Casey has made arrangements to correct this discrepancy, no new grading/drainage plan has been provided at the time of writing this report. The landscape plan states that ail disturbed areas will be reseeded with a native grass -wildflower seed mix and all planing and seeded areas will be irrigated. with an automatic system. Note, number six on the landscape plan is not acceptable with Staff. The retaining wall must be designed and reviewed prior to issuance of a building permit. This application did receive conceptual review by the Planning and Zoning Commission on June 18, 1991. The Commission had the following comments: STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION November 5, 1991 Page 2 of 4 Lot 5, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision Cooper Single Family Residence Final Design Review - Consider breezeway between garage and house. - Detached garage acceptable. - Hip roof form on house is acceptable - should do the same for the garage. - Do some creative grading (boulder work). - The front elevation of the house could be more interesting. STAFF COMMENTS The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of a proposed project: 6.11 - The conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. COMMENT: This proposal is in conformance with the Avon Zoning Code and other applicable rules and regulations of the Town. This lot is zoned duplex and the applicant wishes to construct a single family residence. The applicant is in the process of redrawing the grading plan to conform with Town regulations. 6.12 - The suitability of the improvement, including type and quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located. COMMENT: The type and quality of both building and landscaping materials are suitable with Town guidelines. The proposed building materials are commonly found throughout Wildridge. 6.13 - The compatibility of the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties. COMMENT: All grading will be contained within lot lines. The building has been limited to one level in order to reduce its visual impact. Also, the garage has been STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION November 5, 1991 Page 3 of 4 Lot 5, Block 2, Wildridge Subd vision Cooper Single Family Residence Final Design Review detached from the house in an attempt to reduce the amount of overlot grading. 6.14 - The compatibility of proposed improvement with site topography. COMMENT: This particular lot has a very high profile as viewed from other areas of Wildridge. The proposed building seems to be as good of a solution as any for this lot in light of the limited buildable area. 6.15 - The visual appearance of any proposed improvement as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. COMMENT: The appearance of this residence from neighboring properties and public ways seems acceptable. As mentioned previously, the applicant has limited his building to one story in order to reduce its visual impact. Adequate landscape clusters have been provided throughout the property. 6.16 - The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that value,, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. COMMENT: Staff sees no conflict with %his criteria. 6.17 - The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of the Town of Avon. COMMENT: This proposal is in general conformance with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of the Town of Avon. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of this design review application with the following conditions: 1. Final Staff review and approval of the grading/drainage plan and driveway/road intersection. 2. The landscape plan must match the grading/drainage plan and number 6 on the landscape plan must be removed. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION November 5, 1991 Page 4 of 4 Lot 5, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision Cooper Single Family Residence Final Design Review REQOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Jim Curnutte Town Planner PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Fpproved as submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions ( ) Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( Denied ( ) Wit Date Patti Dixon, Secretar The Commission tabled this application until the November 19 1991, _ me•tinq to give the applicant time to resolve the final garage solution, the landscape/grading/drainage problems con_ideration of drivev.ay angles, U11- MISSION STAFF REPORT TO irlE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION November 5, 1991 Lot 63,Block 4, Wildridge Fehringer Residence Final Design Review INTRODUCTION Stephen Richards, on behalf of Duane Fehringer, is requesting Final Design Review approval of a proposed duplex on Lot 63, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision. Lot 63 is located on Longsun Lane. The lot is 0.42 of an acre in size and has a moderate slope to the west at approximately 24%. The proposed building is approximately 6,150 square feet in size. The north unit is approximately 2620 sq. ft. and the south unit is approximately 3530 sq. ft. in size. This two story, with loft, (30 ft. high maximum)building has gable roofs. Exterior building materials include cedar shake shingles, stucco, 1" x 6" cedar lap siding, cedar trim and Hurd clad windows. The building's flues and flashings will be painted to match the trim. More detailed information regarding building colors will be presented at the meeting. The driveway will be finished with asphalt. It is not clear if the two proposed fireplaces are gas or wood burning. A grading/drainage plan and a landscape plan have been provided for review. STAFF COMMENTS The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of a proposed project: 6.11 - The conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. COMMENT: phis proposal is in conformance with the Avon Zoning Code and other applicable rules and regulations of the Town. This lot is zoned duplex and that is what the applicant is proposing to put on the property. 6.12 - The suitability of the improvement, including type and quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located. COMMENT: The type and gUality of both building and landscaping materials are suitable with Town guidelines. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION November 5, 1991 Page 2 of 3 Lot 63, Block 4, Wildridge Fehringer Residence Final Design Review The building materials proposed for this building are commonly used throughout Wildridge. 6.13 - The compatibility of the design to minimize site impacts tc adjacent properties. COMMENT: The siting and landscaping of the building is sympathetic to the adjacent residential property. All grading will be contained within lot lines. Sufficient landscape clusters are proposed on all sides of the building. 6.14 - The compatibility of proposed improvement with site topography. COMMENT: The building has been designed to step down slightly in the direction of the natural topography of the lot. 6.15 - The visual appearance of any proposed improvement as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. COMMENT: The appearance of this residence from neighboring properties and public ways seems acceptable. Portions of the north elevation of the building are the least interesting. The addition of a few larger plants along this side would be beneficial. 6.16 - The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. COMMENT: Staff sees no conflict with this criteria. 6.17 - The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of the Town of Avon. COMMENT: This proposal is in general conformance with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs c° the Town of Avon. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff rec:ommenus approval of this design review application with the following condition: STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION November 5, 1991 Page 3 of 3 Lot 63, Block 4, Wildridge Fehringer Residence Final Design Review 1. Final ataff review and approval of grading and drainage plan at the time a building permit application is submitted. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Jim Curnutte Town Planner PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions (roved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continue ( ) Denied ( ) With rawn Date Patti Dixon, Secreta The Conmiss on granted final design approval with the condition of final Staff review and approval of grading and drainage plan at the time a building permit application is submitted and that larger trees be included along the north elevation. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION November 5, 1991 Lot 39, Block 3, Koenke Residence Conceptual Design INTRODUCTION Wildridge Subdivision Review Steven Richards, on behalf of Don and Miriam Koenke, is requesting conceptual design review for a proposed single family home on Lot 39, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision. Lot 39 is 1.29 acres, however, the actual buildable portion of the lot is approximatel; half of the total lot area. The northern portion of the lot is relatively flat before dropping off steeply toward the southeast. The proposed building is a two story log home with a two car garage. The house is approximately 4700 square feet in size not including the 650 square foot garage. Exterior building materials are as follows: - Cedar shakes. - Swedish cope exterior walls (spruce). - Aluminum clad windows (bronze). - River rock fireplace chase. - 1" x 6" and 2" x 10" cedar fascia. - Log deck rails. The driveway will be finished with asphalt. The applicant should consider increasing the driveway width (currently shown as 12' wide). A very complete landscape plan has been provided, however, the grading and drainage portion need additional detail. Despite the large amount of relatively flat area on the lot, the applicant wishes to place the house beyond the top of the bank. Although this will increase the visibility of the house as viewed from the south somewhat, it will substantially decrease the mass of the house as viewed from the north, east and west. STAFF COMMENTS As this is a conceptual review, no formal staff recommendation will be presented at this time. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION November 5, 1991 Page 2 of 2 Lot 39, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision Koenke Residence Conceptual Design Review RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review/Discussion Respectfully submitted, A Jim Curnutte Planner STAFF REPORT TO THE 'al-APNING AND ZONING COMMISSION November 5, 1991 Lot 12, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Alpenflora II Condominiums Amy and Paul Britvar Conceptual Design Review INTRODUCTION Amy and Paul Britvar are requesting conceptual design review of a thirteen unit condominium project (Alaenflora II) on Lot 12, Block 2, Benchmark Subdivision. The applicants have indicated tnat the units will be cuntained in two buildings, ont six-plex and one seven-plex. The six-plex building will house two 3 bedroom units, two 2 bedroom units, and two studio units. -he seven-plex building is exactly the same except that a two bedroom unit has been added at the garden level. The buildings will be staggered on the lot. The applicants intend to use the ::ame architectural design and building materials as the Alpen 'ora I project located on Lot 11, except that one of the buildings will have a fourth floor. This application was originally presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission on October 15, 1991. Unfortunately, the applicants were not able to be present at that meeting nor was the application considered complete, so it was tabled by the Commission until tonight's meeting. The application now appears to be complete with the exception of north and west elevation drawings for the seven unit building. STAFF COMMENTS Since this application is a conceptual review, Staff will not offer a formal recommendation, however, we have done a preliminary review and offer the following comments. More detailed drawings of the proposed parking structure are necessary. The structure is currently shown encroaching into setbacks and utility and drainage easements. The driveway leading to the lower level of the parking structure has a 13% grade. The driveway is also located in a utility and drainage easement. The parking spaces nearest west Beaver Creek Blvd. are located within 10' of the front lot line. The trash enclosure on the east end of the parking STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION November 5, 1991 Page 2 of 3 Lot 12, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Alpenflora II Condominiums Amy and Paul Britvar Conceptual Design Review structure is within the side yard setback and the utility and drainage easement. Additional detail of proposed site lighting is necessary. The slope on the east side of building #1 is at 70%. The landscape plan needs work: There is no reference to proposed method of irrigation. The proposed tree sizes are not given. Bushes should be identified by species rather than the phrase "Foreground Plantings". No limit of disturbed area is shown. Will the disturbed area be reseeded or sodded. A fence detail has been provided, but its location is not shown on the plan. More substantial landscaping should be provided along West Beaver Creek Blvd. The lot area shown on the plan is not correct The s ale of the grading and drainage plans and landscaping plan should be increased to 1" = 10' The fireplaces shown on the drawings must be gas. The minimum number of parking spaces for this project is 26, however, there are only 22 shown. Parking for the project is calculated as follows: STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION November 5, 1991 Page 3 of 3 Lot 12, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Alpenflora II Condominiums Amy and Paul Britvar Conceptual Design Review UNIT TYPE Studio 2 Bedroom Bedroom QUANTITY 4 5 4 Guest Parking Total Required REQUIRED PARKING 4 spares 10 spaces _8_ spaces 22 spaces + 4 spaces 26 spaces The Avon Fire Department has some concerns about this project (vehicle weight load limit on parking structure, fire hose distance, etc.). RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review/Discussion Respectfully submitted, f4;t" c•n"V� Jim Curnutte Planner 1-1 -IN STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION November 5, 1991 aw Lot 3, Wildridge Acres Steve Riden for Bob Kedrowski Kola Residence Final Design Review J INTRODUCTION Steve Rider, on behalf of Bob Design Review of a single Wildridge Acres Subdivision. square feet) and is located at Kedrowski is requesting Final family residence on Lot 3, Lot 3 is .19 of an acre (8,161 2804 Sheperd Ridge. The proposed building has a flror area of 2,400 square feet and a maximum building height of 34-1/2 feet above finished grade. Exterior building materials inclu.'e 8" cedar siding, clad windows and masonite shingles (Woodruf). The driveway will be finished with asphalt. Color samples will be presented at the meeting. Although the proposed landscape plan for this lot complies with the overall landscape plan for Wildridge Acres, recent conversations with the applicant indicate that he does not agree with the plan submitted by his architect. On June 4, 1991, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved a different single family home on this lot (Hancock residence). The proposed owner decided not to purchase the home, so a new home has been designed for the lot. STAFF COMMENTS The Commission shall consider the following items 1r. reviewing the design of a proposed project: 6.11 - The conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. COMMENT: This pr000sal is in conformance with the Avon Zoning Code and other applicable rules and regulations of the Town, with the exception that the site plan does not appear to accurately reflect the actual location of the Sheperd Ridge cul-de-sac. If the proposed fireplace is intended to be wood burning, then $1500.00 will be collected at building permit time. STAFF REPORT November 5, Page 3 of 4 TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION 1991 Lot 3, Wildridge Acres Steve Riden for Bob Kedrowski Kola Residence Final Design Review west side of the building will be finished. Also, it would seem that the addition of a window or two on the east elevation would improve the appearance of the house. It should also be noted that on virtually all other homes in Wildridge Acres where the garage door is shown on the outside wall it eventually gets moved to the side nearest the house entry. 6.16 - The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. COMMENT: Although this particular house plan is very similar to two other homes already built in Wildridge Acres, Staff does not feel that monetary or aesthetic values of other homes in the vicinity will be impaired. 6.17 - The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs oT the Town of Avon. COMMENT: This proposal is in general conformance with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of the Town of Avon. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of this design review application with the following conditions: 1. The applicant should indicate on the record, whether or' not, he agrees with the landscaping plan and architectural drawings presented by his architect. Has the potential owner reviewed these plans? If the home presented at this meeting is not the one he intends to build or the landscaping he intends to install, then Staff would recommend tabling this application until the accurate plans can be presented. 2. If, as a result of discussions during the meeting, changes are made to the plans and the applicant receives final design approval, said changes must be reflected on the drawings presented for building permit application. The building permit application drawings must accurately reflect STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION November 5, 1991 Page 4 of 4 Lot 3, Wildridge Acres Steve Riden for Bob Kedrowski Kola Residence Final Design Review the Sheperd Ridge cul-de-sac location as well as building and landscape design. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Jim Curnutte Town Planne- PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions ( ) Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued (--T'Denied ( ) With r Date Patti Dixon, Secreta �__Q.. The Commission tabled this application until the November 19, 1991 meeting due to the lack of detail as presented at this time. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION November 5, 1991 Lot 4, Wildridge Acres Bob Kedrowski Proposed Design Revisions for Corwin/Brown Residence INTRODUCTION On July 16, 1991, Bob Kedrowski received final design approval of the Corwin/Brown residence or. Lot 4, Wildridge Acres. A building permit was issued shortly after the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting and construction of this building began. Last week a final inspection was requested on the building so that the new owners could occupy it. During the inspection it was discovered that numerous siding and fenestration changes had been made to the building (see plans). Also, a fireplace and deck has been added that were not included in the plans. Since these changes have not received the necessary approvals, they are being presented tonight. Mr. Kedrowski has made several unauthorized changes to buildings in Wildridge Acres. After the first unauthorized change the Planning and Zoning Commission asked the Staff to write a letter to Mr. Kedrowski explaining hor the process works (see attached letter). A second letter was sent to Mr. Kedrowski in May after further unauthorized changes were mad on Lot 9 (see second attached letter). STAFF RECOMMENDATION Although the unauthorized changes without previous approval, they Avon's design review guidelines. of the proposed revisions. RECOMMENDED ACTION Presentation of Application 2. Applicant's Presentation 5. Commission Review 6. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Jim Curnutte Town Planner were made to the building do not in any way violate Staff recommends approval STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION November 5, 1991 Page 2 of 2 Lot 4, Wildridge Acres Subdivision Bob Kedrowski Proposed Design Revisions for Corwin/Brown Residence PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions ( ) Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Date 11/5/91 Patti Dixon, Secretary C. Pascuzzi, Recording Secretary This item was not discussed by the Commission since it was resolved administratively prior to the meeting.