Loading...
PZC Packet 060292STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION June 2, 1992 Lot 26, Block 1, Wildridge SUbb)VIsion Front Yard Setback Variance Request Public Hearing INTRODUCTION Donald and Marylir Elterman are requesting a van ante to allow for a two (2) foot deck and stairway encroachment into the required ten (10) foot side yard setback on Lot 2b, Bloch 1, Wildridge Subdivision. The applicants have indicated that the deck and stairway encroachments are necessary to carry out an expansion of the existing 6' x 15' deck and provide access to the yard from the deck. The deck is located on the southeast side of the building and has one corner right on the 10' setback line. No portion of the deck expansion or stairway will encroach into the 7.5' utility and drainage easement. The applicants have indicated that the new deck ana stairway will be finished to match the existing buitding (same materials and colors). STAFF COMMENTS Before acting on a variance application, the Coonm,ssion snail consider the following factors with respect to the requested variance: SECTION 17.36.40 Approval Criteri-a A. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity; STAFF RESPONSE: The proposed deck and stairway expansion is located on the southeast side of the duplex and will be almost entirely screened from the view of the owners of the north half of the duplex. Lot 25 to the south is vacant, as well as the properties to the east. The proposed deck expansion and new stairway should not negatively effect potential uses and structures in the vicinity. B. The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation ant erorcements of a speritied regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity, or, to attain the objectives of this title without grant of special privilege: M1 M a STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION June 2, 1992 Page 2 of 4 Lot 26, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Front Yard Setback Variance Request Public Hearing STAFF RESPONSE: The degree to which the appiicant is requesting relief from the strict enforcement of the regulation is minimal. It would appear however, that it is possible to expand the deck and provide access without encroaching into the setback area at all. C. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety; STAFF RESPONSE: There would not appear to be any negative effects upon the above criteria if the variance were granted. SECTION 17.36.50 Find_ings_Required The Commission shall make the following written findings before granting a variance; A. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations of other properties classified in the same district; B. That the granting of the variance will riot be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; C. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons: 1. The strict, literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objec'-ives of this title, 4W1 401 .7 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING >ND ZONING COMMISSION June 2, 1992 Page 3 of 4 Lot 26, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Front Yard Setback Variance Request Public Hearing 2, There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone, 3. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owner's or other properties in the same district. STAri RECOMMENDATION Staff recommendation is for denial of the variance request as presented. Staff agrees with the applicant that approval of the variance would not have a significant detrimental impact on surrounding properties. However, Staff feels that granting the variance will constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations of other properties classified in the same district and that the literal interpretation of the regulation would not deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. A resolution documenting the Commission's decision and findings regarding this variance request will be presented at the June 16, 1992, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Applicat=on 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Open Public Hearing 4. Close Public Hearing 5. Commission Review 6. Commission Action ft a STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION June 2, 1992 Page 4 of 4 Lot 26, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivsion Front Yard Setback Variance Request Public Hearing Respectfully submitted, 14'� C44�v Jim Curnutte Planner PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions ( ) Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Date �I Patti Dixon, Secretary -CL ------ The Commission granted the front yard setback variance c' ino-Ahe findings 1'1 e�) STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION June 2, 1992 Tract B, Block 2, Filing 2, Eaglebedn Subdivision The Alpines at Eaglebend, Lots 3-19 Four Single Family Home Models Final Design Review INTRODUCTION At the Planning and Zoning commission meeting of May 19, 1992, the Planning and Zoning commission voted to table the final design review request of the Alpines at Eagleberd. The Planning and Zoning commission had several design issues that they wanted to see addressed by the applicant. Those comments were: - Texture and paint should be proposed on large areas 01- exposed fexposed concrete foundation. - The bi-level model needs windows or other architectual treatment above the garage doors. - A specific masonite siding pattern should be chosen. - The applicant should reconsider the white trim color and the bright blue trim color. - A fence detail needs to be submitted. - Information on exterior lighting needs to be submitted. - A new landscape plan needs to be submitted which shows increased material sizes and better delineates sod areas. - The right elevation of the tri -level plan needs some improvements. - The weight of the proposed asphalt shingles needs to be specified. - The "floating chimney" element on the Mountain Laurel model should be modified. The applicant will present their proposed revisions to the Planning and Zoning commission at the Meeting. We have attached the staff report from the May 5, 1992, meeting for the Commissions information. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission review the applicants revisions and, if arreptable, approve - the final design review application. STAFF REPORT June 2, 1992 Pagc 4 of 2 1u THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Tract B, Block 2, Filing 2, Eaglebend Subdivison The Alpines at Eaglebend, Lots 3 - 19 Four single Family Home Models Final Design Review RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Rick Pylman Director of Community Development PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with Recommend'd Conditions ( ) Approved with Modified Conditions ( Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( Date Patti Dixon, Secretary The Commission granted final design review approval to th€ four atngle family home models with the following o nditions: That the landscape plan will be reivsed to show one more clam of f ac nr s per -sil-e-�aking a total of four clumps of aspen trees per site The side yard la^da-caping be extended to the rear of the buildings. The walkway shrub Alantin s be mulched and the drip lines be mulched if the seeded grass does not take hold. All aspen clumps will be a minimum -V' calj-peri That the two windows STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION June 2, 1992 Tract B, Block 2, Filing 2, Eaglebend Subdivision The Alpines at Eaglebend, Lots 3-19 Four Single Family Home Models Final Design Review be added to the siee elevation of the tri -level building; That corner chminey be omitted and vented as discussed• That the suggestion that the developer provide one post light per driveway be considered; That medium weight Tamko shingles be used. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ['ENING COMMISSION May 19, 1992 Tract 2, Block 2, Filing 2, Eaglebedn Subdivision The Alpines at Eaglebend, Lots 3-19 Four Single Family Home Models Final Design Review INTRODUCTION The Eaglebend Partnership is requesting final aesign review approval for four home models to be constructed at The Alpines at Eaglebend. The Alpines is a single family nome development of 19 lots on Tract B of Eaglebend, Block 2. The developer will market the four home models and construct the units as sales occur. The Alpines PUD Guide contains development restrictions regarding site planning and home siting. A typical landscape plan has been submitted for Planning and Zoning Commission review. The four home models are titled a Bi -level, Two Story, Tri -level and Mountain Laurel. All roofs will be a Tamko Asphalt shingle in the antique grey color. Siding for all units will be a masonite product. Several different textures and board sizes will be utilized to create some interest and differentiation among the units. All windows will be white aluminum with a 1 x d cedar trim. The Bi -level model is a two story, 2,037 square foot bi-level floor plan with a two car garage. Roof forms are gable wicn a shed roof extending over the front entrance. The maximum building height is 27 feet. The Two Story model is a two story, 2,0G0 square foot floor plan sitting on a garden level two car garage. Roof forms are predominantly gable with a Shea at the front entry. Building height is 32 feet. Deck raiiinga are designed as cedar latticework, similar to the of-ievel model. There is some exposed concrete foundation as this unit makes the grade transition. This concrete should be treated in some manner. The Tri -level model is a two story, 2,593 square foot tri -level floor plan, with a two car garage. Th -.s inodei carries the simplest gable roof form of the four. This model has one elevation that is very plain and would present a poor image if it was presented to a neighboring home. As a north elevation, toward the railroad tracks, the Staff has less concern and would suggest requiring this home to be sited that way unless substantial revisions to this elevation are made. The Mountain Laurel model is a two story unit with a true -'-, ,,..` STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION May 19, 1992 Page 2 of 5 Tract B, Block 2, Filing 2, Eaglebend Subdivision The Alpines at Eaglebend, Lots 3 - 19 Four Single Family Home Models Final Design Review basement. The unit is 2,194 square feet, 30 feet in heignt and continues the gable roof format of the previous models. Deck railings on this unit are a cedar picket. The Planning and Zoning Commission expressed a concern at the conceptual review with the fireplace design of this unit. The fireplace element "floats" above ground level. STAFF COMMENTS The Commission shall consider the following items to reviewing the design of a proposed project: 6.11 - The conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. COMMENT: This proposal is in conformance with the zoning code and Staff, through the building permit process, will ensure compliance with all aspects of the approved PI-I!j Guide. 6.12 - The suitability of the improvement, including type and quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located. COMMENT: The exter4'or materials for each unit are essentially the same, although some variecy can be achieved through the use of different siding wiuzhs and textures, as well as by color scheme variation. The Staff feels that the combination of like elements, while allowing some individuality through color, siding style and siting, is appropriate for this development. 6.13 - The compatibility of the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties. COMMENT: Staff feels that the development style chosen here, along with the materials and architecture are well designed to minimize impact to adjacent properties. The PUG Guide provides for four parking spaces per unit which should alleviate any parking concerns wltn this project. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION May 19, 1992 Page 3 of 5 T act B, Block 2, Filing 2, Eaglebend Subdivision The Aplines at Eaglebend - Lots 3 - 19 Four Single Family Home Models Final Design Review 6.14 - The compatibility or proposed impr;3vement witn site topography. COMMENT: The site topography is reiatively simple, however, some of the models are designed to allow for some variation of the overall grading of the project. 6.15 - The visual appearance of any proposed improvement, as viewed from adjacent ano ne;gnbor ig properties and public ways. COMMENT: The visudi appearance of these structures is adequate from all adjacent public and private properties. The Planning and Zoning Commission should review the typ — ai landscape plan to ensure that the landscaping of each unit will match the standards established in the neighborhood. 6.16 - The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impa-red. COMMENT: This project will contain up to 19 units of four different models, so there is quite a bit of similarity involved here. Staff believes that this similarity is important to the success of this smali scale residential development and have no concerns w;th this criteria. 6.17 - The general improvements with the adopted the Town of Avon. conformance of the proposed Goals, Policies and Programs r COMMENT: The proposal is in conformance with the aaoptea goals, policies and programs of the Town of Avon. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends final design approval for these four model homes for construction w1tilln the Alpines at Eaglebend PUD with the following recommendations to the Planning and Zoning Commission: 1. Approval of the Two Story model should include some treatment to the a -posed concrete foundation walls. Staff suggests p=int or stucco. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION May 19, 1992 Page 4 of 5 Tract B, Block 2, Filing 2, Eaglebend Suodivison The Alpines at Eaglebend, Lots 3 - 19 Four single Family Home Models Final Design Review 2. Approval of the Tri -level model be conditional upon the siting of the home. The "right" elevation should be utilized only as the north elevation. 3. Revisions to the fireplace chase on the MounLain Laurel model are strongly suggested. 4. The Planning and Zoning Commission should review and approve color schemes for the models. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully s bmitted, IL� 1/L_v Rick Pylman Director of Community Development STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION May 19, 1992 Page 4 of 5 Tract B, Block 2, Filing 2, Eaglebend Suodivison The Alpines at Eaglebend, Lots 3 - 19 Four single Family Home Models Final Design Review 2. Approval of the Tri -level model be condltionai upon the siting of the home. The "right" elevation should be utilized only as the north elevation. 3. Revisions to the fireplace chase on the Mountain Laurel model are strongly suggested. 4. The Planning and Zoning Commission should review and approve color schemes for the models. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2, Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully sbmitted, Rick Pylman Director of Community Development n STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND'ZONINC COMMISSION May 19, 1992 3. Page 5 of 5 Tract B, Block 2, Eaglebend Subdivsion The A'ipines at Eagle Bend, Lots 3 - 19 Four Single Family'Home Models Final Design Review PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions ( ) Approved with Modified Conditions k ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( i Date Patti Dixon, Secretary yy�y�A11T^ ca lyr cr— �✓�y A.-ti/v. $ �,o f, recaKs,d•✓ lon6".r- Vc� t,-'% . ce ta.r .Q\ek,k-w, M 40 Li STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION June 2, 1992 Lot 65/66, Block 2, New Satellite Dish, Design Review INTRODUCTION Benchmark Subdivision Radio Shack Gary Feloman, on behalf of Radio Shack is requesting final design approval for a new stellite dish on the Annex Building, Lo`. 65/66, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision. The proposed satellite dish is located on the second story deck area on the west side of the building. The dish is painted to match the building and all cables/wires have been hidden as much as possible. STAFF COMMENTS The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of a proposed project: 6.11 - The conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. COMMENT: The Avon Design Guidelines provide the following recommendations for consideration when reviewing communications & satellite dish antennae: - Antennas shall be screened from any public right-of-way or neighboring property. Screening may be accomplished by, or through the use of landscaping materials, fencing, existing structures, subgrade placements or other means that both screen the antennae and appear natural to the site; - All wiring and cable related to antennae installation shall be installed underground or be incorporated entirely within the structure; - The use of mesn antennaes is encouraged; - Color selection for dish antennae should be made with respect to the characteristics of the site or structure. Unpainted surfaces and dish antennas with reflective surfaces shall not be allowed. No advertising, logos or identification shall be allowed on any dish antenna. Staff feels that the applicant has made a reasonable effort to comply with the recommendations listed above. 6.12 - The suitability of the improvement, including type and quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to he located. ,02N 1'� STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION June 2, 1992 Page 2 of 3 Lot 65/66, Block 2, Benchmark Subdivision New Satellite Dish, Radio Shack Design Review COMMENT: The proposed satellite dish is mesh as suggested above and is painted to match the building. 6.13 - The compatibility of the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties. COMMENT: None of the proposed changes will have site impacts on adjacent properties. 6.14 - The compatibility of the proposed improvement with site topography. COMMENT: This crit -ria is not applicable to this request. 6.15 - The visual appearance of any proposed improvement as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. COMMENT: The proposed dish deck at the back of the Annex bu The Benchmark Building to the portion of its east elevation. people looking at the buildi possibly the southwest, however visual appearance of the dish is is located on a second story ilding, bordering an alley. west has no windows on a The dish will be visable to ng from the northwest and staff does not feel that the objectionable. 6.16 - The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. COMMENT: Staff sees no conflict with this crite-ia. 6.17 - The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of the Town of Avon. COMMENT: The proposal appears to be substantially in conformance with the adopted goals, policies and programs of the Town of Avon. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends final design approval of the proposed satellite dish as presented. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION June 2, 1992 Page 3 of 3 Lot 65/66, Block 2, Benchmark Subdivision New Satellite Dish, Radio Shack Design Review RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Jim Curnutte Town Planner PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions ( ) Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Date_ _Patti Dixon, Secretary The Commission granted approval for the stew satellite dish_for_Badia Shack as submitted. - STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION June 2, 1992 Lot 52, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision Franklin Residence Building Design/Material/Color Changes Design Review INTRODUCTION On September 18, 1990, John Railton, on behalf or owner Matt Franklin, received final design approval of a single family residence on Lot 52, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision. The approved residence is aproximately 2,600 square feet in size not including the 570 square foot two car garage. The house has a steeply pitched gable roof form. The siding is shiplap cedar accented by heavy trim pieces around the doors and windows. Stucco was used sparingly as an accent material. The approved roof material was machine cut wooden cedar shingles. The approved colors for the project were: Siding - Beige transparent stain (Weathermaster - Moorhead 300) Trim - Opaque white stain Windows - White metal clad on wood The applicant is now requesting design al:proval for certain building design, material and exterior color changes. The proposed changes are as follows: Building Des191Chances - The window on the lower floor of the east elevation will be moved to the third floor. Also a skylight will be added and the plexiglass deck wind screens will be removed on the east elevation. - The garage windows, the lower floor window and tha chimney chase will be illiminated on the west elevation. - Two doors will replace two windows on the second story and the rounded (greenhouse) windows will be replaced with angled flat windows on the south elevation. Building Material Changes - The cedar shingles will be changed to the Elk Prestique #1 asphalt shingle. This shingle will weight atleast 300 lbs. per square and have a high definition shaced profite. The proposed color is "Shakewood". STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION June 2, 1992 Page 2 of 4 Lot 52, 3lock 4, Wildridge Subdivision Franklin Residence Building Design/Material/Color Changes Design Review - All areas where stucco had been shown will be iliiminated. The area of stucco on the south elevation will be replaced with siding, the chimney chase will be removed and the foundation wall on the north elevation will be painted. BuiIding Color Chan es - The siding color will be changed to Moorewood i# 075-45. A natural wood color transparent stain. - Windows will be a dark grey -bronze color STAFF COMMENTS The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of a proposed project: 6.11 - The conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. COMMENT: This proposal is in conformance with the zoning code and other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. 6.12 - The suitability of the improvement, including type and quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the site t.pon -rich it is to be located. COMMENT: The propos>ed design/material/color changes all appear to be suitable with the architecture of this building. 6.13 - The compatibility of the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties. COMMENT: None of the proposed changes will have site impacts on adjacent properties. 6.14 - The compatibility of the proposed improvement with site topography. COMMENT: The proposed changes will not affect the projects compatibility with site topography. ") '"y M STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION June 2, 1992 Page 3 of 4 Lot 52, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision Franklin Residence 3uilding Design/Material/Color C':anges Design Review 6.15 - The visual appearance of any proposed improvement as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. COMMENT: Staffs only concern with regard to this criteria has to do with the look of the fireplace flue pipe now that the chase is proposed to be removed. The applicant proposes to mitigate possible negative effects by painting the flue a dark grey tone. 6.16 - The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. COMMENT: Staff sees no conflict with this criteria with the exception that the amount of exposed flue pipe (7') seems to be more that other homes in Wildridge. 6.17 - The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of the Town of Avon. COMMENT: The proposal is in conformance with the adopted goals, policies and programs of the Town of Avon. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends final design approval of the proposed design/material/color changes as presented. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action C C • , STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNT14G AND ZONING COMMISSION June 2, 1992 Page 4 of 4 Lot 52, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision Franklin Residence Building Design/Material/Color Changes Design Review a Respectfully submitted, Jim Curnutte Town Planner PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions ( ) Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Date Patti Dixon, Secretary ,, ^ eo) rl� STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION June 2, 1992 Lot 1, Lodge at Avon Subdivision Avon Towne Square Reouest for Extension of Design Review Approval INTRODUCTION: On May 15th of 1990, the Avon Planning and Zoning Commission granted final design approval to the Avon Towne Square project, a three story retail and office project on the Lodge at Avon Subdivision site. The approval was slated to expire on May 15, 1992, however on May 5, 1992, the Planning and Zoning Commission granted a 45 day extension to allow the applicant time to prepare a request: ana presentation for a full year extension. The applicant is also proposing a minor subdivision of the property in order to allow seperate ownership of the restaurant pad site. A site plan and further details of the proposal will be presented at the meeting. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff believes this is a fair request and recommends approval of the one year extension request. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Presentation of application 2. Applicant's Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respec'cfully submitted, Rick Pylman Director of Community Development STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION June 2, 1992 Page 2 of 2 Lot 1, Lodge at Avon Subdivision Avon Towne Square Request for Extension of Design Review Approval PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions ( ) Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Date Patti Dixon, Secretary The Commission approved the extension of the design review approval as submitted with the recommendation that the applicant review all screening on the rear of the buildings and the applicant return for a final color approval. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION June 2, 1992 Lot 67, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision Brennand F9sidence Conceptual Design Review INTRODUCiION James L. Brennand is requesting conceptual design review ct his proposed single family residence on Lot 67, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision. Lot 67 is .51 of an acre (22,21_ square feet) in size and is located on Wildridge Road East. The Brennand residence will be accessed via a 12' wide asphalt driveway which approaches the house from the northeast at approximately 5%. A conceptuai landscape/grading/site plan has been submitted for the commissions review. The proposed two story residence is aoprox,mateiy 2,150 square feet in size, not including the two car garage. Maximum building height is 26'. Tnere is a gas tireolace located in the living room of this home and a deck located at grade along the south side of the bu ldinq. Exterior building materials are as follows: Timberline Ultra asphalt shingles (siate blend) 1" x 6" cedar siding (stained white birch) Stucco located at the chimney only (white) - 1" x 4" & 1" x 10" cedar facia (white) Cedar plywood soffits (white) Clad casement windows (white) Wood deck STAFF COMMENTS As this is a conceptual review, no formal action will be taken at this time. However, Staff would offer th? following comments: The 12'wide driveway is narrower than that recommended and previously approved in Wildridge. A 16'width is recommended, however, 14' has been approved on occasion. Grades along the south side of the house exceed the 511% allowable (approximately 80%). The overall amount of landscape materials seems rather minimal. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION June 2, 1992 Page 2 of 2 Lot 1, Lodge at Avon Subdivision Avon Towne Square Request for Extension of Design Review Approval PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions ( ) Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Date Patti Dixon, Secretary The Commission approved the extension of the design review approval as submitted, with the recommendation that the applicant review all screening on the rear of the buildings and the applicant return for a final � . ,i/, :. � � ��. �i i/ � ' .� . � . /1 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISS:ON June 2, 1992 Lot 67, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision Brennand Residence Conceptual Design Review INTRODUCTION James L. Brennand is requesting conceptual design review of his proposed single family residence on Lot 67, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision. Lot 67 is .51 of an acre (22,216 square feet) in size ano is located on Wildridge Road East. The Brennand residence will be accessed via a 12' wide asphalt driveway which approaches the house from the northeast at approximately 5%. A conceptual landscape/grading/site plan has been submitted for the commissions review. The proposed two story residence is aoproximately 2,150 square feet in size, not including the two car garage. Maximum building height is :6'. There is a gas fireolace located in the living room 3f this home and a deck located at grade along the south side of the building. Exterior building materials are as follows: - Timberline Ultra asphalt shingles (slate blend; - 1" x 6" cedar siding (stained white birch) - Stucco located at the chimney only (wh,te) - 1" x 4" & 1" x 10" cedar facia (white) - Cedar plywood soffits (white) - Clad casement windows (white) - Wood deck STAFF COMMENTS As this is a conceptual review, no formal action will be taken at this time. However, Staff would offer the following comments: The 12'wide driveway is narrower than that recommenaed and previously approved in Wildridge. A 16'width is recommended, however, 14' has been approved on occasion. Grades along the south side of the house exceed the 5t.1% allowable (approximately 80%). The overall amount of landscape materials seems rathr minimal. r. 40 •1 June 2, 1992 Page 2 of 3 Lot 67, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision Brennand Residence Conceptual Design Review RECOMMENDED ACTION Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review/Discussion Respectfully submitted, Jim Curnutte Planner