PZC Packet 120694F90
AVON PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
WORKSESSION
AGENDA
PLACE: TOWN OF AVON COUNCIL CHAMBERS
DATE: DECEMBER 06, 1994
TIME: 5:30 PM
AGENDAITEMS
1) Discussion of Ordinance 94-21, Amending Title 8, Chapter 8.24 of the Municipal Code
of the Town of Avon as it relates to Public Nuisances.
2) Conceptu LI Review of Lot 3, Nottingham Station, PUD Amendment.
3) Other Business
NOTE: Dinner will be provided.
POSTED AT THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC PLACES WITHIN THE TOWN OF AVON
ON 12/02/94
AVON COASTAL MART ENTRANCE TO AVON POST OFFICE
CITY MARKET MAIN AVON MUNICIPAL BUILDING
L]
AVON PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
AGENDA
PLACE. TOWN OF AVON COUNCIL CHAMBERS I
DATE DECEMBER 06,1994
7:30 PM - REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
II. CONSENT AGENDA
I Lot 63, Block 1, Benchma. ..r oeaver Creek Subdivision, Seasons
Modification
2 Lot 7, Block I, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision. ReRoof &
Berm Addition
3 Lot 86. Block 1. Wildridge Subdivision, Draw Spur Association Sign
4 Lot 73174, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, Ski Shop
\pproval of November 15, 1994. Planning and Zoning Commission
%1ccune .Minutes
111. PI BLU NEARING
I Lot 12. Block L Benclunark at Beaver Creek Subdivision. SRI' fix
Residential I'm(
! nt 14,1 t, Black I Benchmark at Bea%er Creek Subdivision. Iiei_eht
wAnce
I ,), 1 1 1 4� Block I Benchmark at Beaver Creek, Parking \': iance
AVON PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
AGENDA
DECEMBER 06,1994
CONTINUED
'V. FINAL DESIGN REVIEWS/MODIFICATION
I Lot 67, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, Recycle
Shed
2 Lot 43, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision, Fuel Tank Storage.
3. Lot 3, Block 3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek, Exhaust Fans.
4. Lot 3, Block 3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek, Signage
V. OTHER BUSINESS
VI. ADJOt.'RNMENT
POSTED AT THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC PLACES WITHIN THE TOWN OF AVON
ON 12/02/94
AVON COASTAL MART ENTRANCE TO AVON POST OFFICE
CITYMARKET MAIN AVON MUNICIPAL BUILDING
•
L
PLANNING Ai,J ZONING COMMISSION STAFF ..PORT
December 6, 1994
Lot 3, Nottingham Station
Nottingham Station PUD Amendment
PRCJECT TYPE: Nottingham Station P.U.D. Amendment
ZONING: PUD
INTRODUCTION
Shapiro Develoment Companv has submitted an conceptual review for an amendment to
the existing Nottingham Station Planned Unit Development.
Attached are sections of the Zoning Code, Comprehensive Plan, Recreation Plan and
Transportation Plan the applicants must address. There are others that are not included at
this point, but must be addressed further in the process. Staff has included these sections
for the Commission to review and assess how the applicant is addressing these provisions.
The site plan will be provided at the meeting
Respectfully Submitted,
Mary Holden
Town Planner
;,
.,:. ,;
2C
;\
\ ,
4 --
i
LEGEND
EXISTING 2' GROUND CONTOUR
ELECTRIC VAULT
WATER VALVE
SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
BARBED WIRE FENCE
GUY WIRE
POWER POLE
DECIDUOUS 'REE
EDGE OF Roz --R
DITCH CENTERLINE
WETLAND MARKERS (2/24/94)
30' MEAN ANNUAL FLOOD SETBACK
[•
As%
Shapiro Development Company
Avon Center Building, Suite 230
100 West Beaver Creek Boulevard
P.O. Box 5640
Avon, Colorado 81620
Phone: 949-7980
Fax: 949-7984
DATE: November 22, 1994
® TO: Town of Avon
� P.O. Box 975
Avon, Colorado 81 620
ATTN: Mary Holden, Planner
RECEII'D
NOV 2 2 1994
wMMUNITY DEVEL, , 4NT
RE: PUD Amendment for Lot 3, Nottingham St.tion
Avon, Colorado
We are enclosing the following items for the above project:
Via Hand Delivery
4 copies Preliminary Submittal for PUD Amendment:
Narrative
Preliminary Site Development Plan
Preliminary Floor Plans and Elevations for Riverfront
Buildings
Landscape Vignette and Site Sections
REMARKS
Preiiminary Submittal for conceptual review at the December 6th Planning &
Zoning meeting.
We will supplement this with additional material at the meeting or sooner in
order to provide as clear information as possible for the Town staff and the P&Z
committee to review.
Please call if you have any questions, particularly if you see additional
information which would be important to your review.
SIGNED:
Sh-ipiro Development Company
E wi mto Architect
cc: Ken Shapiro
Jerry Landeck
Jeff Spanel
If the enclosures are not as noted, please notify us at once.
Preliminary Submittal
Amendment to
Planned Unit Development for
Lot 3, Nottingham Station
Town of Avon
Eagle County Colorado
Developer 'Applicant:
Shapiro Development, General Partner
P.O. Box 5640
Avon, Colorado 81620
Phone: 949-7980
Fax: 949-7984
November 22, 1994
Table of Contents
Project Description
A. Status of existing PUD approval
B. Summary of Proposed Amendments to Existing PUD
•
Zoning Review (additional material to follow)
A. Intention
B. Application
C. Development Review Procedure
D. Submittal Requirements
E. Development Plan
E. Density
C. Uses
H. Design Criteria
I. Development Standards
PUD Architectural Control Guide (additional material to follow)
A.
Lot Area
B.
Site Dimensions
C.
Setbacks
D.
Height
E.
Density Control
F.
Site Coverages
G.
Landscaping
H.
Parking
Attached Documents
Freliminary Site Development Plan
Preliminary Floor Plans and Elevations for Riverfront Buildings
Landscape Vignette and Site Sections
NOV 23 '94 03:eGPM P.2
Project Description:
Shapiro Development Company is proposing an amendment to the approved
Planned Un;t Development for Lot 3, Nottingham Station (formerly known
as "The Bou,ders on Eagle Fiver"). The original PUD was approved on April
26, 1994. The approved PUD was for a phased residential development of
150 dwelling units. The amended PUD submittal proposes 144 new
dwelling units.
Summary of Changes:
The following lists the primary differences between the original PUD and the
proposed amendment.
Building groups - size, location and massing:
The original PUO for Lot 4 planned 6 building groups along the bank
overlooking the river v lth 2 additional buildings adjacent to Hurd Lane.
The buildings were to have a 20 foot separation. Four of the buildings
were 152 feet long, with one 188 feet and one 116 feet.
The amended PUD proposes 9 hui;dings along the south side of the site
with no additional buildings. The buildings when parr:;iei have a 20 foot
separation. When set at an angle to aach other, there Is a minimum
separation of 15 feet (typically widening to 25 feet or more). The typical
building is 108 feet long. One building at the far east end of the site is
134 feet long. This reduces the length of any one structure and allows
more openings to the river frontage. Access stairs down the slope will
be provided at three places.
The riverfront buildings in the original PUD were 3 stories in height. The
amendment proposes 4 stories. But the lowest level Is set more into the
bank so that the overall massing of the buildings is approximately the
same. See the attached sections contrasting the original and amended
buildings.
Original PUD Amended PUD
Total number of units
150 units 144 units
Maximum gross HvIng area
225,000 sf 197,000 sf
Min. setback from river
30 ft from mean 40 tt from mean
annual high water annual high water
mark mark
(30' required
minimum + 10')
Building groups - size, location and massing:
The original PUO for Lot 4 planned 6 building groups along the bank
overlooking the river v lth 2 additional buildings adjacent to Hurd Lane.
The buildings were to have a 20 foot separation. Four of the buildings
were 152 feet long, with one 188 feet and one 116 feet.
The amended PUD proposes 9 hui;dings along the south side of the site
with no additional buildings. The buildings when parr:;iei have a 20 foot
separation. When set at an angle to aach other, there Is a minimum
separation of 15 feet (typically widening to 25 feet or more). The typical
building is 108 feet long. One building at the far east end of the site is
134 feet long. This reduces the length of any one structure and allows
more openings to the river frontage. Access stairs down the slope will
be provided at three places.
The riverfront buildings in the original PUD were 3 stories in height. The
amendment proposes 4 stories. But the lowest level Is set more into the
bank so that the overall massing of the buildings is approximately the
same. See the attached sections contrasting the original and amended
buildings.
A 0%
Bike path:
The original PUD showed conceptually a bike path along the river in the
flatter area beyond the toe of the slope. Site review by the Corps of
Engineers indic,--tes that the existing wetlands precludes the placement of
any path in that area. Any path constructed on, the slope itself is
prohibitive in terms of the cut and fill required and the destruction of trees
at the east end of the site. The amended proposal shows an 8 foot
minimum multi-purpose path along Hurd Lane, detached from the roadway
and meandering within a landscaped area. The path may be extended
down to the river edge at the west end of the property where there
wetlands are not an issue or may continue along Hurd Lane to Avon Road.
Detailed Project Description:
The PUD includes approximately 14 acres with the following breakdown:
Lot 3
2.896 acres
Residential uses - up to 70 units
Lot 4
4.588 acres
Residential uses - up to 74 units-
Lot 5
1.527 acres
Existing use - no change proposed
Hurd Lane
R.O.W.
1.734 acres
To be dedicated to Town of Avon
Tract C
3.418 acres
Open space and river - to be dedicated to
Town of Avon
This results in the following densities:
Lot
Lot Area
Units
Density
Lot 3
2.896 acres
70
24.2 units/acre
Lot 4
4.588 acres
74
16.1 units/acre
Project
Total
9.218 acres
developable area
144
15.6 units/acre
The Hurd Lane Right -of -Way will be extended from the western edge of the
property to Eagle Bend Drive to the east. The Right -of -Way will be dedicated
to the Town of Avon and a street to Town of Avon standards will he
constructed from the end of existing pavement on the west to the existing
Eaglebend Drive on the east.
Tract C is a parcel including a portion of the Eagle River and the adjacent
bank area including existing wetlands which will be dedicated as open space
to the Town of Avon.
Lot 5 contains an existing home and outbuildings and will remain
unchanged.
The remaining two parcels will contain a maximum of 144 residential units
which will be sold as condominiums. The residential units will range in size
from approximately 850 sf to 2000 sf. with a total maximum gross enclosed
living area of 197,000 sf for the two parcels.
Parking will be provided in accordance with Town of Avon Off -Street Parking
and Loading requirements contained within Title 17 Zoning. Parking will
consist of a combination of attached garages, detached garages, under -
building parking and surface parking spaces. The only assigned spaces will
be in covered parking (garages and under -building). "% of the spaces
are covered.
Chaoters•
17.04
17.08
1'7. 12
17.14_
17.16
17.20
17.24
17.28
17.32
17.36
17.40
17.44
17.46
17.48
17.50
17.52
Sections:
17.04.010
17.04.020
17.04.030
17.04.040
Chanter 17.04
GENERAL PROVISIONS
Short title.
Purposes.
Intent.
Recordation of waiver of district regula-
tions.
17.04.060 Exemption for
17.04.070 Authority to
17.04.080 Applicability
17.04.090 Conceptual or
certain essential services.
require additional studies.
to public agencies.
preliminary approvals.
17.04.010 Short title. This title shall be known and
may be cited as the 'Zoning Code of the Tocvn of Avon.'
(Ord. 91-10 §1(part)).
17.04.020 Purposes. The purposes of this title are:
A. To divide the town into zones, or districts,
restricting and requiring therein the location, erection,
construction, reconstruction., alteration and use of build-
ings, structures, and land for trade, industry, residence
and other specified uses;
178 (Avon 8/91)
)
KO
[•
[4M
17.20.110
F. Density. Allowable density shall be determined in
accordance with the project's compliance with the design
criteria in subsection H of this section and the suitabili-
ty of the proposed density for the site.
G. Uses. Determination of permitted and accessory
uses shall be made by the planning and zoning commission
and town council and shall be compatible with the character
of the area adjacent to and surrounding the PUD.
H. Design Criteria. The following design criteria
shall be used as the principal criteria in evaluating a
PUD. It shall be the burden of the applicant to demon-
strate that submittal material and the proposed development
plan comply with each of the following design criteria or
demonstrate that one or more of them is not applicable, or
that a particular development solution consistent with the
public interest has been achieved.
1. Conformity with the Avon comprehensive plan
goals and objectives;
2. Conformity and compliance with the overall de-
sign theme of the town, the sub -area design recommendations
and design guidelines adopted by the town;
3. Design compatibility with the immediate envi-
ronment, neighborhood, and adjacent properties relative to
architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer
zones, character, and orient& ion;
4. Uses, activity, and density which provide a
compatible, efficient, and workable relationship with sur-
rounding uses and activity;
5. Identification and mitigation or avoidance of
natural and/or geologic hazards that affect the property
upon which the PUD is proposed;
6. Site plan, building desicn and location and
open space provisions designed to produce a functional
development responsive and sensitive to natural features,
vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the community;
7. A circulation system designed for both vehicles
and pedestrians addressing on and off-site traffic circula-
tion that is compatible with the town transportation plan;
8. Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open
space in order to optimize and preserve natural features,
recreation, views and function;
9. Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will
maintain a workable, functional and efficient relationship
throughout the development of the PUD. The phasing plan
shall clearly demonstrate that each phase can be workable,
functional and e`ficient without relying upon completion of
future project phases;
213 (Avon 8/91)
•-"s
17.20.110
10. Adequacy of public services such as sewer, wa-
ter, schools, transportation systems, roads, parks, and
police and fire protection;
11. That the existing streets and roads are suit-
able and adequate to carry anticipated traffic v14 thin the
proposed PUD and in the vicinity of the proposed PUD.
I. Development Standards. Development standards in-
cluding lot area, site dimensions, setbacks, height, densi-
ty control, site coverages, landscaping and parking shall
be determined by the town council as part of the approved
development plan with consideration of the recommendation
of the planning commission.
'his determination ehall be based ;,-;on thr. evaluation
of the proposed PUD's ccznpliance with the desi4n criteria
outlined in subsect.;.on is of this section.
J. Existing Planned Unit Develcpments. Existing PUDs
which have had a precise or specific plan for development
approved shall not be affectea by these regulations and
terms, conditions, and agreements contained within those
PUDs shall continue to be binding upon the applicants
thereof and the town.
Existing PUDs which have not been approved with a
precise or specific plan shall be subject to the review
procedures for the adoption of an approved development plan
as described above.
-_ K. Amendment Procedures.
1. Amendments: Requests for amendments to an ap-
proved planned unit development shall be reviewed in accor-
dance with the procedures described above for approval of a
PUD.
2. Owners of all property requesting the amend-
ment, or their agents or authorized representatives, shall
sign the application. Notification of the proposed amend-
ment shall be made to owners of all property adjacent to
the property requesting the proposed amendment, owners of
all property adjacent to the PUD, and owners of all proper-
ty within the PUD that may be affected by the proposed
amendment (as determined by the department of community
development).
L. Time Requirement.
1. The developer must begin initial construction
of the PUD within three years from the time of its final
approval, and continue diligently toward the completion of
the project.
2. If the applicant does not begin and diligently
work toward the completion of the PUD or any stage of the
PUD within the limits imposed by the preceding subsection,
the approval of said planned unit development shall be
vo:.d. The planning commission and town council shall re-
view the planned unit development district upon submittal
214 (Avon 8/91)
�
�e
I /
I
ow1
Goals and Objectives
Goals and objectives are essential to the preparation and implementation
of the comprehensive plan. They determine the course of action to be
taken during the plan preparation process and in the future.
Goal: A goal is an end towards which effort is directed. It provides the
community with direction. In this sense, a goal is an ideal and a value to
be sought.
Objective: An objective is a milestone along the way towards reaching the
goal. It is capable of being attained and measured. Objectives are
developed for each goal in order to measure whether or not the
community is moving in the direction of the stated goal.
The goals and objectives have been divided into sections corresponding to
areas of concern within the community. The sections are: Land Use;
i
Economic Development; Housing; Community Facilities; Transportation,
Parking and Circulation; Annexation; Environment; Recreation and Open
Space; and Image/Design.
A. LAND USE
Goal #Al: Ensure that all land uses are located in appropriate locations with
it Objectives:
X
tg
=q
Zi
appropriate controls.
(a) Identify the appropriate scale of deve'.cpment for each area of Town.
(b) Review undeveloped sites and assess their suitability to accommodate
future growth.
(c) Identify parcels of land upon which the existing land use is
inappropriate, and promote their redevelopment.
(d) Review the existing land development regulations, including zoning
and subdivision regulations,, and development rights
to ensure that they provide for orderly, desirable, and flexible
development patterns.
3.1
ON
(e) ,f lift connections are made to Beaver Creek or Arrowhead,
supporting land uses should be planned for and developed adjacent
to the lift facility.
Goal #A2: Locate land uses to make the most efficient use of existing land and
community resources.
Objectives: (a) Promote the development of infill parcels within the Town Core area.
(b) Locate new development within or adjacent to existing developed
areas.
Goal #A3: Upon full development of the community, all land uses should work
together as a balanced system.
Objectives: (a) Plan for an appropriate mix of land uses.
(b) Provide for a balance of automobile and pedestrian -oriented
commercial uses.
Goal #AJ: Capitalize on the Eagle River as a focal point for future development.
Objectives: (a) Emphasize the river corridor as a site for the development of
recreational amenitics and linkages.
(b) Promote the orientation of future development along the river
corridor to the river as an asset and amenity.
Goal #A5: Provide municipal services and utilities to e-lsting development, as
needed, and plan for the extension of the Town's Infrastructure to
accommodate future development.
3.2
a
i
F
t
a
B. ECONOMIC
i DEVELOPMENT
7y Goal #B1:
Provide a sound basis for economic stability through the development of
facilities and activities which strengthen the Town's year-round tourism
d
base.
Objectives:
(a) Achieve a significant amount of convention -related business activity.
(b) Provide for enhanced recreational amenities and activities which are
supportive of economic development.
(c) Increase the Town's lodging base.
(d) Promote the development of alternative tourism activities to :he
traditional ski -based market.
(e) Promote the development of additional entertainment activities in
the core area.
Goal #B2:
Enhance the Town's role as a principal, year-round residential and
commercial center in the Vail Valley.
Objectives:
(a) Provide for increased opportunities for development of service-
oriented commercial and light industrial uses, with proper controls to
ensure compatibility.
(b) Provide the opportunity for mixed use development at urban
densities on vacant parcels in the Town Core, to serve both the
tourism market as well as local residents.
_14(c) Promote opportunities for the development of housing which is
affordable to existing and new Town residents.
(d) Encourage the complete development of the Wildridge/Wildwood
area.
d
3.3
AMN
(e) Provide for the phased development of public facilities necessary to
strengthen the residential community, such as schools, parks,
community center, etc.
I Goal #B3: Achieve a strong relationship with the region's major resorts, particularly
Beaver Creek and Arrowhead.
Objectives: (a) Promote the development of enhanced transit and access
opportunities with both the Beaver Creek and Arrowhead Resorts,
including gondola connections, shuttle buses, trails, and
pedestrianways.
t
(b) Strengthen the Town's relationship to the resort community and the
Town's image through marketing and promotional activities.
(c) Encourage joint planning by the Town and Vail Associates of
properties at key locations, particularly at the U.S. 6/Avon Road
intersection, along U.S. 6 to the west of Avon Road, and along
Benchmark Road.
C. HOUSING
Goal #Cl: Provide for an appropriate mix of residential dwelling unit types for both r
permanent residents and tourists.
Objectives: (a) Evaluate the exist"ng housing supply and areas planned for
residential development, both within the present Town limits and
wi.hin the three-mile environs, and make adjustments where
appropriate.
L
Goal #C2: Affordable :iuusing, both rental and owner occupied, should be made
available through a combination of private and public efforts.
Objectives: (a) Provide incentives for the upgrading of existing affordable housing F
and the development of additional affordable housing on appropriate E
sites.
9
1
i
3.4
;d•
•
--a
i
-7
(b) Identify areas of Town which are appropriate for the development of
-� affordable housing.
7
(c) Support the housing authority in its efforts to coordinate and
r facilitate the development of affordable housing.
Goal #C3: Encourage the continual maintenance and upgrading of residential
properties throughout the Town.
D. COMMUNITY
ii FACILPPIES
-' Goal #DI: Public facilities should be developed as necessary to maintain the proper
level of public services in the Town.
>> Objectives: (a) Identify the need for various public facilities necessary to serve the
community.
—„ (b) Designate appropriate locations throughout the community for
public facilities, such as schools, cemetery, community recreation
center, etc.
E. TRANSPORTATION,
PARKING, AND
CIRCULATION
J Goal #EL• Provide an Improved vehicular circulation system throughout the Town.
-'
Objectives: a
() Evaluate the existing circulation system, and develop a plan for
improvements for access to individual development sites.
-' (b) Work with the Rio Grande Railroad and State Highway Department
i
to provide a separated grade railroad crossing on Avon Road.
(c) Work with the railroad to provide additional railroad crossings within
the Town.
0
(d) Identify additional street improvements needed for traffic circulation
throughout the Town.
3.5
60
ti (b) Identify areas of Town which are appropriate for the development of
affordable housing.
y
(c) Support the housing authority in its efforts to coordinate and
facilitate the development of affordable housing.
Goal #C3: Encourage the continual maintenance and upgrading of residential
properties throughout the Town.
7
E. TRANSPORTATION,
PARKING, AND
CIRCULATION
Goal #EI: Provide an Improved vehicular circulation system throughout the Town.
J.
Objectives: � (a) Evaluate the existing circulation system, and develop a plan for
J improvements for access to individual development sites.
i (b) Work with the Rio Grande Railroad and State Highway Department
to provide a separated grade railroad crossing on Avon Road.
i
(c) Work with the railroad to provide additional railroad crossings within
the Town.
i
(d) Identify additional street improvements needed for traffic circulation
throughout the Town.
3.5
D. COMMUNITY
i
FACILITIES
-'
Goal #D1:
Public facilities should be developed as necessary to maintain the
proper
level of public services in the Town.
Objectives:
(a) Identify the need for various public facilities necessary to serve the
community.
(b) Designate appropriate locations throughout the community for
public facilities, such as schools, cemetery, community recreation
f
center, etc.
E. TRANSPORTATION,
PARKING, AND
CIRCULATION
Goal #EI: Provide an Improved vehicular circulation system throughout the Town.
J.
Objectives: � (a) Evaluate the existing circulation system, and develop a plan for
J improvements for access to individual development sites.
i (b) Work with the Rio Grande Railroad and State Highway Department
to provide a separated grade railroad crossing on Avon Road.
i
(c) Work with the railroad to provide additional railroad crossings within
the Town.
i
(d) Identify additional street improvements needed for traffic circulation
throughout the Town.
3.5
Aft,
r_
Goal #E2: Provide aii improved pedestrian circulation system throughout the Town.
Objectives: (a) Evaluate the existing circulation system and develop a plan for a
sidewalk system.
(b) Develop a trail system along the Eagle River.
(c) Provide safe and adequate pedestrian crossings of major roadways,
specifically Avon Road, Interstate 70, and the -ailroad.
(d) Promote the extension of a regional bikeway system to the upper Vail
Valley.
Goal #E3: Develop opportunities for mass transportation.
Objectives: (a) Maintain the existing regional and Town -wide bus system, and
expand as necessary to provide services to the community as it grows.
(b) Provide safe and efficient bus stops.
(c) Promote the establishment of rail transportation to serve the Upper
Eagle Valley.
Goal #E.t: Provide an adequate supply of parking, both public and private, to serve
the needs of file community.
Objectives: (a) Explore opportunities for the provision of public parking.
(b) Encourage the joint use of parking where apprepriate.
(c) Analyze existing Town parking requirements.
3.6
Fn
F. ANNEXATION
Protect and enhance the water quality of the Eagle River and
r
Nottingham Lake.
f -
Goal #Fl:
Annex key parcels of land adjacent to the Town boundary.
s�
(e)
Maintain and preserve the air quality of the Town.
Objectives:
(a) Encourage the owners of property adjacent to the Town to enter into
(f)
agreements regarding annexation.
minimize cnvironmental degradation and to preserve the visual
(b) Promote the master planning of parcels of land at the time of
annexation.
(g)
(c) Facilitate trades of Forest Service land that are in the best interest of
the community.
(d) Develop agreements with Eagle County regarding the appropriate
AWN
land use for parcels of land adjacent to the Town.
:M
3.7
a
G. ENVIRONMENT
Gaal #G1:
Ensure that the high quality, natural environment is preserved and
integrated Into the developed areas of the Town.
LW
-"
Objectives:
(a) Ensure that future development will minimize degradation of the
environment, particularly in sensitive natural areas.
Mi
(b) Preserve views of the mountains and the valley.
Fn
(c)
Protect and enhance the water quality of the Eagle River and
MW
Nottingham Lake.
(d)
Encourage public access to USFS lands.
(e)
Maintain and preserve the air quality of the Town.
(f)
Provide, special controls for development in hillside areas to
minimize cnvironmental degradation and to preserve the visual
character of these unique areas.
(g)
Work with the Division of Wildlife to minimize impacts on critical
wildlife habitat, nesting and breeding areas, and migration routes.
AWN
3.7
a
H. RECREATION AND
OPEN SPACE
Goal #HI: Provide a balanced system of recreation, parks, and open space to meet
the needs of residents of the Town.
Objectives: (a) Cooperate with Eagle County and other governments in planning,
protecting, and managing public open space, and in providing access
and linkage opportunities.
(b) Provide for the development of recreational amenities within new
residential acid resort developments.
(c) Make provisions for land dedications for open space and recreation
purposes in association with new annexations and development.
(d) Emend the Town's bike path system.
Goal #112: Establish the Eagle River as a greenbelt corridor through the Town.
Objectives: (a) Provide for access and recreation opportunities to the river.
(b) Develop a pedestrian bike path system along the river.
Goal #10: Encourage the development of recreational areas and facilities as a
catalyst for economic development.
Objectives: (a) Evaluate opportunities for limited recreationally -oriented
commercial development in and around Nottingham Park, such av
bicycle rentals, food concessions, etc.
I
3.8
im
I. IMAGEMESIGN
Goal #I1: Ensure that a high quality visual image of the Town Is established
3 through both public and private sector activities.
-� Objectives: (a) Strengthen the role of the Town Center Mall as a unifying element
for the core arca.
-�
(b)
Strengthen the Town's design standards to ensure that development
will be appropriate in scale, intensity, and character. Emphasis shall
3
be placed on architecture, landscaping, streetscapc, and signage.
(c)
Provide for public improvements which enhance the visual
3
appearance of the Town, including strectscape along major roadways,
signage, street lighting, etc.
(d)
Establish an overall design theme for the Town, particularly the
Town core, which is reflective of the Town's setting and character.
(c)
Improve the appearance and image of the service district along
Nottingham and `ictcalf Roads through enhanced design, screening
of activities, and landscaping.
,�.
(f)
Improve the image of the Town as viewed from Intcr%tatc 70.
34 (g) Pro%ide for the development of f(xal points within the Town at kcs
+:n
areas, including landmarks, public spaces, outd4x)r kulpturc. and'
other features to enhance the image of the aummuni" and pnnxfc
ild visual tntcrcst.
(h) Create design standard-. for residential subdrvtsums whk:h arc
complementary to and rnhanoc crnrnant-cnfomcd guidelines.
39
Commercial and residential uses should also be contained in the areas
designated Town Center. Town Center uses are grouped west of Avon
Road to create an urban environment with exciting public spaces in the
center of Town. This area will serve as the heart of the Town; it is critical
to the development of a "real town" image for Avon. No other land uses
within the Town should be more intensely developed than the Town
Center.
-� Adjacent to Avon Road are small open space parcels that should be
maintained to create an attractively landscaped corridor through the
center of Town. Two accesses to adjacent properties have been
rt� eliminated and converted to open space. See the Transportation/
Circulation Plan (Figure 4.3).
East of the Core Commercial A ea is a large parcel known as the
Nottingham Ranch. The west end is appropriately developed as an
extension of the commercial core. The remainder could be develcned for
a variety of land uses and is therefore designated mired use. The entire
V4 area should be master planned. Limitations to development on this
property include the ability of East Beaver Creek Boulevard to handle
additional traffic demands caused by the proposed uses. The Town
should pursue the acquisition of land fog community services and parks.
The Eagle Rlver The large undeveloped parcels adjacent to the Eagle River that are closest
to Avon Road are designated mixed use. These lands have the potential
to be developed for a combination of land uses, as long as the uses and
3 physical design of the site are sensitive to the natural riparian
environment. High priority should be placed on the incorporation of
public pedestrian spaces which allow river access. The same applies to
future residential developments adjacent to the river. A public
-� recreational trail is shown along the river that is discussed further in the
Open Space and Recreation section of this chapter.
As discussed in the Town Core Planning Influences section, access to
parcels adjacent to the river is presently limited. Adding a bridge across
the river west of Avon Road, and connecting Hurd Lane with Eaglebend
Drive are ways to improve access.
L�
A
A3 4.7
Open Space/Natural Resource Areas: Open space can vary in function
and size, and is defined as land or water protected in a relatively
undeveloped condition. Most of the site should be left undeveloped, and
no more than 20% developed in a low intensity manner. A network of
open space can be used for trails connecting various activities within the
Town, such as schools, parks, houses and shopping. Open space offers
opportunities for unstructured recreation, such as hiking, biking, jogging
or fishing, and provides an opportunity to relax and enjoy nature. It can
be used to give the Town form and definition by providing buffer areas
between land uses. Open space protects environmentally sensitive areas,
preserving wildlife, vegetation, and unique natural features, and in some
cases, can be designed so that it recreates a natural environment.
Level of Service Standard: Variable; an exact acreage standard is
impractical to establish due to the fact that open space areas should be
preserved based on the natural features of the land.
Service Area: The service area is the entire Town and environs.
Size: Variable, depending on the natural resource(s) that are desired to
be preserved.
r-Z�Z) Location: The location is determined by the natural resource, such as
creek corridors, gulches, steep slopes, waterbodies, areas of significant
environmental quality, geological hazards areas, or corridors connecting
parks, schools, and residential areas.
Typical Facilities: Open space protects natural areas and provides many
passive uses, including:
410
El
Passive Uses
Important vegetation and wildlife habitat
Wetlands
Scenic areas or vistas
Land for agricultural uses
Floodplains in their natural condition
Stcep slopes
Buffer areas between urban development
Areas for low intensity recreation, such as hiking, biking, horseback riding,
casual picnicking, nature study, and fishing
Parking for trail heads
Trails: Trails are off-street recreational systems for bicycling, jogging,
walking, and equestrian use.
Level of .Service Standard: Variable.
Size: 50' right-of-way is optimum, with 10' paved width for bicycle trails.
Location: Along drainageways, connecting parks and open space areas,
and through parks and open space areas.
Typical Facilities: Mainly consisting of paved bicycle and pedestrian paths
and unpaved equestrian trails.
4.21
v
4
n
The highest priority recreational projects according to Eagle County
residents are:
o
F 1.
New indoor/outdoor swimming .omplex
2.
Bike trails
_ 3.
Indoor recreation center with gymnasium, dance, etc.
4.
Theater,'srts complex
- 5.
Neighborhood parks
6.
Softball diamonds
7.
Improve/develop e: fisting parks
8.
Additiona! golf coy r ,e
a�
9.
Purchase land for oi,:n space
10.
Purchase land for pat'._
10 Identified by the Town Council as highest priority for the Town of Avon
is a recreation center. Possible locations for the center, as well as its size
MR requirements and facilities program, is presently being studied.
Recommendations Trails and Open Space: As shown on the Overall Town Plan (Figure 4-1)
and the Town Core Land Use Plan (Figure 4-2), an 8' pedestrian/bicycle
trail should connect the west and east ex remes of the planning area. The
Town should coordinate with Eagle County planning efforts to ensure that
the trail is connected to the regional bike trail system.
In the Core Area, the trail could be part of designated open space areas
along the Eagle ;fiver, or located in public access easements associate3
with adjacent developments. In the interest of safety, it is best to separate
pedestrian and bicycle traffic from automobile traffic as much as possible.
The Eagle River is an exceptional amenity for the Town that presently is
underutilized because of limited opportunities for public access. The
acquisition of open space parcels and the establishment of public access
easements along the river corridor should be pursued. Facilities for
picnicking and benches for people watching should be included along the
_ trail.
'� 4.23
A pedestrian and bicycle connection from the Eagle River to Nottingham E
Park is desirable, but must be elevated to cross over the railroad tracks.
Pedestrian pathways to the river trail should be provided as part of the E
strectscape impro•. ements indicated on the Town Core Urban Design Plan
(Figure 5-1). F
f
Other open space lands that are important to the Town are drainages,
floodplains, and steep slopes. Besides being undesirable to develop, these
areas have characteristics that make them good candidates for public open
space: drainages and tloodplains form natural linear corridors for trails,
and function as wildlife migration routes and critical habitat areas; steep
Li .
slopes adjacent to the Town are higl,iy visible elements of the landscape
and should be protected to ensure that the quality mountain character of
the Town is maintained.
Parks: Nottinghan. Park is an attractively designed and highly used public
E .
facility. On Pormal days, parking is adequate; however, during special
events (such as concerts and various community celebrations), the demand
E
for parking exceeds the supply. Some additional parking should be
I
E
provided on the park site. Because of the park's importance to the
passersby impression of Avon, views into the park from I-70 should be
E. ,
preserved. Summer use of the lake could be enhanced through the
development of a beach area for sunning and swimming. If the park's four
tennis courts east of Benchmark Road are replaced with a municipal
E
parking structure, as indicated on the Town Core Land Use Plan, an
i
alternative location should be found. Ideally, they should be
E ,
reconstructed in association with the development of the future school or
I
community recreation center designated for Tract P west of the park.
No developed or undeveloped neighborhood parks presently exist in
L
Avon. Nottingham Park serves the need for residents in the Town Core
F
Area, but two parks should be designated near the developing residential
areas north of Town -- Wildridge and Wildwood. As discussed earlier in
b
F�
kI
F�
r
4.24
rJ
0
. Enhance Buck Creek from the park north along Benchmark Road.
Meander its alignment, create drops with boulders, and plant more
_
trees, shrubs, and wildflowers to produce a natural effect. Provide an
4
informal pedestrian path as part of the streetscape improvements.
Paint water treatment facility a darker neutral color to make it less
y
visible in the summer. Enhance screen planting around facility.
r* Subarea 10:
The majority of the land within this district is undeveloped.
Riverfront District
The Town Core Land Use Plan indicate., mixed use development for this
area, meaning that the potential exists for many different uses to be
located here. The critical design issues that any development should
address are the visibility from U.S. 6/24, the preservation and
enhancement of the riparian environment along the Eagle River, and
public access along the river. All uses which are located within this district
should, be developed to create an attractive appearance from U.S. 6/24,
with landscape setbacks and screened parking areas. The character of the
river and its associated natural habitat should be preserved by sensitive
r�
site planning, architectural detailing, and appropriate setbacks, colors and
scale of structures, as described in the following recommendations.
_
Recommendations:
Within building setback areas adjacent to the Eagle River, provide a
public access easement for public enjoyment of the river and
construction of a public recreational trail. Require a minimum 30'
building setback from the Eagle River.
P�
r
5.21
Require development to provide reasonable public access through
their property to the river, and to provide public parking and signage
_
at strategically located trailheads.
4
. Require screening or buffering of offensive uses to ensure a quality
river environment and pleasant views from U.S. 6/24.
y
. Buildings should be oriented to capitalize upon the Eagle River as an
_
amenity. Parking areas, trash dumpsters, loading or service areas,
and other uses which could potentially disrupt the quality of the river
P�
r
5.21
environment should be located and designed to have the least impact
on the river corridor. Set buildings back from river to preserve its
natural character.
• Limit building heights to three to four stories. The intent is to
establish a scale of development that is subordinate to the Town
Center and compatible with the river environment.
• Buildings should be designed to step down in height as they near the
river and in response to the natural topography.
• Encourage new development and redevelopment of existing
buildings to be in conformance with the overall design theme
established for the Town.
• Where possible, buildings and parking areas should be located to
preserve and promote the health of existing quality trees.
• Require the replacement of all quality 5" caliper and larger destroyed
trees with minimum 3 12" caliper deciduous or 8' tall coniferous
trees in numbers to equai the negotiated value of the destroyed trees.
• Develop minimum landscape setbacks from main access roads to
ensure visual quality.
Subarea 11: This area is characterized by steep terrain, flat areas presently
U.S. Highway 6/24 used for parking, and high visibility from U.S. 624. Its location
South District at the base of the Beaver Creek Valley makes it an area where first
impressions of the Town are developed. Access from U.S. 624 is limited,
so well planned, internal circulation is essential.
Recommendations:
Encourage new develo f mcnt and redevelopment of existing
buildings to be in conformance with the overall design theme
established for the Town.
5._'?
/ ANN
R E C R E A T I O N MASTER P L A N
Town of
Avon,
Colorado
WINSTON ASSOCIATES, INC./ RRC ASSOCIATES
ro erwven toff.
1Ml SS1£Y
EAST CENTRAL
i IREC WA NDED &JGMIENTI
C
EAST END
it
ElTown Owned Land
HM11 Steep Sbpe
l P 1 Potential Park Site
s/P Seatln4/Smaa Pl Mea
4.15
/'RSCRF.AnoN mAffm PUN
`" T. d Ann CdaW.
RIVER CORRIDOR .................—
TRAIL PLAN — — — --
FIGURE S
T RAN S PORTATION P L A N
Town of
Avon,
Colorado _
l � I
Felsburg Holt A Ullevig
o Avon Road/I-70 North Ramps - Signalize the intersection and
1lrovide two -through lanes in each dirty �n through the intersec-
_ion and an exclusive northbound to we. fund left turn lane.
Provide dual left turn lanes and an exclusive right turn lane for the
westbound I-70 exit ramp.
o Avon Road/Beaver Creek Boulevard - Provide two -through lanes
in each direction on Avon Road and add an exclusive right turn
lane on westbound Beaver Creek Boulevard.
o Benchmark Road - Provide a continuous connection between Avon
Road and Beaver Creek Place; signalize the intersection of Bench-
mark Road and Avon Road and provide exclusive left turn lanes on
both approaches to Avon Road.
Phase Ii - Roadway System Improvements (Figure 4)
The second level of travel demand requiring roadway modifications occurs
at approximately 15% of the future travel demand increment. The follow-
ing improvements are needed to maintain acceptable traffic operations:
o US C/Avon Road - Provide dual left turn lanes on southbound
Avon Road and on eastbound US 6. Provide two through lanes and
an exclusive right turn lane on westbound US 6.
o US 6/I-70 - Implement a half -diamond interchange at US 6 and
I-70 providing access from 1-70 westbound to US 6 and access to
I-70 eastbound from US 6.
o West Beaver Creek Boulevard - Widen to a five -lane cross-section
between Benchmark Road and Avon Road.
o Hurd Lane - Deveiop a continuous, two-lane connection along the
Hurd Lane corridor between West Beaver Creek Boulevard and
Stonebridge Drive. At the intersection with Avon Road, both
approaches on Hurd Lane should be provided with exclusive :eft
turn lanes.
way System Improvements (Figure 5)
The third level of travel demand requiring roadway improvements occurs at
approximately 35% of the future travel demand increment. At this level of
development Avon would be approximately twice its current size. The
following improvements are needed to maintain acceptable traffic opera-
tions:
o Avon Road/I-70 South Ramps - Signalize the intersection and
provide two through lanes in each direction through the intersection
and an exclusive southbound to eastbound left tum lane. Provide
dual left turn lanes and an exclusive right turn lane for the east-
bound I-70 exit ramp. Complete Avon Road to a five -lane cross-
section between Buck Creek Road and US 6.
Swift Gulch Road/East Beaver Creek Boulevard - Extend both
roadways easterly (consistent with development activities) and
connect under I-70. Provide right-of-way to implement an ulti-
mate three -lane cros section.
o Stonebridge Drive - Extend northerly across the D&RGW railroad
to connect with East Beaver Creek Boulevard (extended). Provide
right-of-way to implement an ultimate three -lane cross-section.
o Benchmark Road - Provide a new three -lane connection between
Beaver Creek Place and the Stonebridge Drive extension as an
extension of Benchmark Road.
11
J J J
Jjf1,f)
Page le
A&M-to-molli /o VlP/M livulwc^Iffil�
w
h
sVIRM vn/0 �fvmpvoy
o
\
0
VlP/M APAWRoa b
M
p
U
g
� H
h
o
�a0
:
O J
J
J
J
m b
f
h
m
e
i
•
J J J
Jjf1,f)
Page le
O
h
E"
o
0
o�
U
g
� H
h
o
�a0
i
w
y
Laz
Page 10
PLANNING Ar -) ZONING COMMISSION STAFN ORT
December 6, 1994
Lot 63, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Seasons at Avon
Final Design Review - Modifications
PROJECT TYPE: Commercial Building ZONING: TC - Town Center
COMPLIES WITI I Z_ONING? YES
INTRODUCTION:
Mark Donaldson, on behalf of Avon Partners ll, has submitted an application requesting
Design Review Board approval for the modification to the north porte cochere.
STAFF COMMENTS:
The proposed modification and the original approval are attached to the Staff Report.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommendation is for the Commission to approve the requested modification.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
I Introduce Application
2 Applicant Presentation
3 Commission Review
4 Commission Action
Respectfully submitted,
Mary Holden
Town Planner
r.� IA
PLANNING Alvb ZONING COMMISSION STAFF ,..:PORT
December 6, 1994
Lot 63, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Seasons at Avon
Final Design Review - Modifications
PLANNING AND ZONING ACTIOh;:
Approved as submitted (� Approved with recommended conditions ( )
Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( )
Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( )
Date�ji ' /,Pt1kSue Railton, Secretary --
Approved as submitted.
i�
IL
��IF
v
F�4
Iq
i
-OW.
PLANNING Nit) ZONING COMMISSION STAF► .,e PORT
December 6, 1994
Lot 7, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Balas West Condos
Final Design Review - Site Modifications and Re -roof
PROJECT TYPE: Residential ZONING: RLD
COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES
INTRODUCTION:
Mr. Walter Scott has submitted an ap;,lication, on behalf of Balas West Condo, requesting
approval of a re -roof and the addition ,)�a. berm on the south portion of the site.
STAFF COMMFNTc-
"The berm will be four feet high, six feet wide and will run the length of the south property
line, excluding the utility easements on the east and west. It will be seeded with native
wildflower mix. There are three cottonwood trees that are affected by the berm by the
piling of dirt up around the trunk of the tree. This type of piling; around the trees will kill
them The trees and trunks must be kept clear of the dirt
The type of roof material will be slate gray, asphalt shingles.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommendation is for approval with the following condition.
I The cottonwood trees may not have any dirt piled against their trunks If dirt has
been piled around the trunk, it must be removed immediately Should any trees die
from t5e dirt being piled around them, they must be replaced to equal the size
killed
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
I Introduce Application
2 Applicart Presentation
Commission Review
4 Commission Action
Al %
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFr ,,,PORT
December 6, 1994
Lor 7, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Balas West Condos
Final Design Review - Site Modifications and Re -roof
Respectfully submitted,
Mary Holden
Town Planner
PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION:
Approved as submitted (7 Approved v,ith recommended conditions (�
Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( )
Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Q
Date Sue Railton, tiecretary
Approved with the -following condition:
1. The cottonwood trees may not have any dirt piled against
eir trunks. If di-rT-Fas--Ue`en piled around the trun i
must be removed immediately. Should any trees die from the
dirt beigg piled around them, they must be replaced to equal
the size killed.
.1Nak4V%. 3 a_lVg41ryQ f
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
December 6, 1994
Lot 86, Block 1, Wildridge
Draw Spur Sign
Final Design Review -Sign
PROJECT TYPE: Entry Sign
"ZONING: PUD COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES
INTRODUCTION:
JK Perry De-elopment has submitted an application for approval of an entry sign.
Attached is a rendering of the sign and a site plan indicating location.
STAFF COMMENTS:
"Sian Guidelines" and review criteria from the Sign Code
Section 15.28.060 Sign Design Guidelines
A. Harmonious with Town Scale. Sign location, configuration, design, materials,
and colors should be harmonious with the existing signs on the structure, with the
neighborhood, and with the townscape.
B. Harmonious with Building Scale. The sign should be harmonious with the
building scale, and should not visually dominate the structure to which it b --longs or call
undue attention to itself.
C Materials. Quality sign materials, including anodized metal, routed :)r
sandblasted wood, such as rough cedar or redwood, iaterior-lit, individual plexiglass -
faced letters; or three dimensional individue.l letters with or without indirect lighting, are
encouraged.
Sign mate,ials, such as printed plywood, interior -lit box -type plastic, and paper or
viny' stick -on window signs are discouraged, but may be approved, however, if
determined appropriate to the location, at the sole discretion of the Commission
D. Architectural Harmony The sign and its supporting structure should be in
harmony architecturally, and in harmony in color with the surrounding s ructures.
E. Landscaping. Landscaping is required for all free-standing signs, and should be
designed to enhance the sis,nage and surrounding building landscaping.
F. Reflective Surfaces. Reflective surfaces are not all,)wed.
,.0*611
PLANNING Ao,D ZONING COMMISSION
December 6, 1994
Lot 86, Block I, Wildridge
Draw Spur Sign
Final Design Rrview-Sign
PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION:
Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recomm :nded conditions (-/)
Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( )
Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No action ( )
Date Sue Railton, Secretary_
Approved with the recommended condition:
1. A landscaped area he provided around the sign and approved
PLANNING Aim t) ZONING COMMISSION
December 6, 1994
Lot 86, Block 1, Wildridge
Draw Spur Sign
Final Design Review -Sign
G. Lighting. Lighting should be of no greater wattage than is necessary to make
the sign visible at night, and should not reflect unnecessarily onto adjacent properties.
Lighting sources, except neon tubing, should not be directly visible to passing pedestrians
or vehicles, and should be concealed in such a manner that direct light does not shine in a
disturbing manner.
H. Location. On multi -story buildings, individual business signs shall generally be
limited to the ground level.
Section 15.28.07 - Sign Design Review Criteria
In addition to the sign Design Guidelines listed above, the Planning and Zoning
Commission shall also consider the following criteria while reviewing proposed sign
designs:
A. The suitability of the improvement, including materials, with which the sign is to be
constructed and the site upon which it is to be located:
Comment The sign material is consistent with the vicinity.
B. The nature of adjacent and neighboring improvements:
Comment The sign is compatible with adjacent and neighboring improvements.
C The quality of the materials to be utilized in any proposed improvement:
Comment: The quality of the proposed sign material is acceptable.
D. The visual impact of any proposed improvement as viewed from any adjacent or
neighboring property.
Comment: The visual impact of the proposed sign will be consistent with existing area
signs.
E. 'i'he objective that no improvement will be so similar or dissimilar to other signs in the
vicinity that values, mor:tary or aesthetic , will be impaired
Comment: The proposed sign meets this design criteria.
F. Whether the type, height, size, and/or quantity of sign:, generally complies with the sign
code an:' appear to be appropriate for the project
,� �
,
PLANNING A rD ZONING COMMISSION
December 6, 1994
Lot 86, Block 1, Wildridge
Draw Spur Sign
Ficial Design Review -Sign
Comment: The type, size and location of the proposed sign complies with the Sign Code.
G. Whether the sign is primarily oriented to vehicular or pedestrion traffic, and whether
the sign is appropriate for the determined orientation.
Corr., went: The sign is primarily oriented toward vehicular traffic.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recorm-nends the Commission approve this application as with the following
cond'tion:
1. A landscaped area be provided around :h sign and approved by Staff
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
1. Introduce Application
2 Applicant Presentation
3. Commission Review
4. Commission Action
Respectfully submitted,
Mary Holden
"Town Planner
novmw 14) x`19
AifrI. . min I4L-v�
Mc",
II G�,JNt�OtA E, j
Ectw,l;rl s, (C) 3 &► Z,
(303 l4Li-xt2
C
rn
m -D
m
G
c
o �a
fn
v
z
II G�,JNt�OtA E, j
W/
1-
'--� 5 1CZi�
EL E�'TRICAL
;R NSFGRMER\
/
TELEPHONE
PEDESTAL
— — — — — — -UEBOI
P�7 ,
5/9 REBID Iy,A UMINIUW t -N, 01 4
5.00'
/- 15.70'
KT rNA"-
� A
d r
N26;5 �
EDGE
>� A5PNAET
\ BASIS OF EL
\ MANHGI.E MH ✓
RIM EL EV. = B(
\� INV ELEV. = 86
PLANNING AN 0 ZONING COMMISSION STAFF kr,PORT
December 6, 1994
Lot 73/74, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Comfort Inn
Final Design Review - Chr tge of Use to Allow for Ski Shop
PROJECT TYPE: Change of Use ZONING: TC
COMPLIES WITH ZONING? No, Requires Approval for Ski Shop
INTRODUCTION:
Bill Young is requesting approval to allow the operation of a ski shop at the Comfort Inn
for the use of Comfort Inn guests Comfort Inn has given their approval for this use.
There is adequate parking for the use to occur on sit(,. Please refer to the attached
information for location of ski shop on site and layout of the shop.
The applicant is also requesting approval to place a sign in the window. Attached is the
proposed sign.
STAFF COMMENTS:
The ski shop use is allowed by the Zone District, however, a change or additional use
must receive approval from the Commission.
The request is appropriate, however, the sign does not appear to be appropriate The ski
shop is for the use of the guests of Comfort Inn and they will be made aware that this
serv'ce is available to them. It would appear the sign will attract people other than guest,
whicii could create a problem from a parking stand point
"Sign Guidelines" and review criteria from the Sign Code.
Section 15.28 060 Sign Design Guideines
A Harmonious with Town Scale. Sign location, configuration, design, materials,
and colors should be harmonious with the existing signs on the structure, with the
neighborhood, and with the townscape
B Harmonious with Building Scale The sign should be harmonious with the
building scale, and should not visually dominate the structure to which it iuelongs or call
undue attention to itself
( Materials Quality sign materials, including anodized metal, routed or
sandblasted wood, such as rough cedar or redwood, interior -lit, individual plexig!ass-
faced letters, or three dimensional individual letters with or without indirect lighting, are
encouraged
AM,
PLANNING AIq V ZONING COMMISSION STAFF kt:PORT
December 6, 1994
Lot 73/74, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Comfort Inn
Final Design Review - Change of Use to Allow for Ski Shop
Sign materials, such as printed plywood, interior -lit box -type plastic, and paper or
vinyl stick -on window signs are discouraged, but may be approved, however, if
determined appropriate to the location, at the sole discretion of the Commission.
D. Architectural Harmony. The sign and its supporting structure should be in
harmony architecturally, and in harmony in color with the surrounding structures.
E. Landscaping. Lanriscaping is required for all tree -standing signs, and should be
designed to enhance the signage and surrounding building landscaping.
F. Reflective Surfaces. Reflective surfaces are not allowed
G. Lighting. Lighting should be of no greater wattage than is necessary to make
the sign visible at night, and should not reflect unnecessarily onto adjacent properties.
Lighting sources, except neon tubing, should not be directly visible to passing pedestrians
or vehicles, and should be concealed in such a manner that direct light does not shine in a
disturbing manner.
H Location On multi -story buildings, individual business signs shall generally be
limited to the ground level.
Section 15.28 070 - Sign Design Review Criteria.
In addition to the sign Design Guidelines listed above, the Planning and Zoning
Commission shall also consider the following cnteria while reviewing proposed sign
designs
A The suitability of ;he imprrne!nent, including materials, with which the sign is to be
constructed and the site upon which it is to be located.
Commem. The sign and material is not consistent with the vicinity.
B The nature ct'adjacent and neighboring improvements
Comment The sign is not compatible with adjacent and neighb.rring improvements
Adjacent improvements are a mixed use fbr the general public. This use if for the guests
of Comfort Inn
C The quality of the materials to be utilized in any proposed improvement
Comment. The quality ct the prof,)sed sign material is acceptable
r
PLANNING Ai,%0 ZONING COMMISSION STAFF kr:PORT
December 6, 1994
Lot 73/74, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Comfort Inn
Final Design Review - Change of Use to Allow for Ski Shop
D. The visual impact of any proposed improvement as viewed from any adjacent or
neighboring property:
Comment: The visual impact of the proposed sign will be consistent 7vith existing area
signs. However, this sign is not for drawing attention of people other than guests of
Comfort Inn.
E. The objective that no improvement will be so similar or dissimilar to other signs in the
vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic , will be impaired
Comment: The proposed sign meets this design criteria.
F. Whether the type, height, size, and/or quantity of signs generally complies with the sign
code and appear to be appropriate for the project:
Comment: The type, size and location of the proposed sign complies with the Sign Code.
The sign, however, is not appropriate for the project, since it is for the guests of Comfort
Inn.
G. Whether the sign is primarily oriented to vehicular or pedestrian traffic, and whether
the siun is appropriate for the determined orientation.
Comment: The sign is primarily oriented toward the hotel guests.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Commission approve this application with the following condition
1. No signs be allowed for this use since it is for guests of Comfort Inn.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
I. Introduce Application
2. Applicant Presentation
3. Commission Review
4 Commission Action
PLANNING At.il ZONING COMMISSION STAFF KEPORT
December 6, 1994
Lot 73/74, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Comfort Inn
Final Design Review - Change of Use to Allow for Ski Shop
Respectfully submit*ed,
Mary Holden
Town Planner
PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION:
Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recom .fended conditions ( )
Approved with modified conditions ( ✓� Continued ( ) Denied
Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) �a
Date_ T� Sue Railton, Secretary� 4—�
The Commission approved with modified condition:
1. The sign be on from the hours of 8 am until 11 pm.
.�tPoP Lcer3 r/off
Ile
1440 aJ
07
OU / �.�' Gi'/:4tE•V.S� D�L'J cuk 4�4�/iJ,Y! �+��+F �y
.;7' ye /� ��, �„ 7-e> Ae. sir. 1 -6e -r Ah*&K = 3 75-
ce%
s4 4el 4�eI6�y y47 ue rf
Bn fir/ yv ,cL/Jz C a �. �� �z �1� ��2a�.✓ i �� f:x5 �p
>46 jWaes � .
I� _ l�scJ .see.
---- -- Yee
,�'�n�cs_ cfr�w•� j�
/�;
�, �uJ� �
� a-�.�/
---. Ou f
/
-
.�tPoP Lcer3 r/off
Ile
1440 aJ
07
OU / �.�' Gi'/:4tE•V.S� D�L'J cuk 4�4�/iJ,Y! �+��+F �y
.;7' ye /� ��, �„ 7-e> Ae. sir. 1 -6e -r Ah*&K = 3 75-
ce%
s4 4el 4�eI6�y y47 ue rf
Bn fir/ yv ,cL/Jz C a �. �� �z �1� ��2a�.✓ i �� f:x5 �p
N
J
0
Z
r
W-1
,y w
P�rl-vft
QQ Ac7,� o'er 7�i
win ks y ti.�e .
FYs- 7-;-'7a
Planning and %ening Commission Staff Repert
December 6, 1994
Special Review Use -Residential Unit
Valley Wide Plumbing and Heating
Lot 12, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
PROJECT TYPE: Special Review Use -Public Hearing
ZONING: IC COMPLIES WITH ZONING? Upo_r, Approval of SRU
This is a Public Hearing for a Special Review Use to allow for a residential unit on
Lot 12, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek.
INTRODUCTION
Thomas S. D'Agostino has submitted an application requesting approval of a residential
unit for his building on Lot 12, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek. The zoling for the
lot, IC Zone District, allows residential units in conjunction with the business operation
STAFF COMMENTS
There are two issues involved with this application. The two issues involve the Uniform
Building Code and the Zoning Cede.
Uniform Building Code
There is a person currently living on the premise. This area was approved as storage and
mechanical room use for the building. The building permit plans reflected this area as
storage and mechanical room.
Our building inspector has been on site to inspect the accommodations, and has found the
following:
• A shower area has been added without review, approval or plans for
construction;
• The area does not meet the Uniform Building Code (UBC) regarding
emergency egress/ingress, and
• There are no cooking facilities.
Zoning Code:
The plans issued for construction do not indicate a bathroom, but one has been installed.
For an area to he classified as a residential unit they must meet the following criteria:
"Accessory apartment means an additional dwelling unit either in or added to the
existing principle building on the lot, for use as a complete, independent living
facility with provisior within the accessory apartment for cooking, eating,
C
Planning and tuning Commission Staff Report
December 6, 1994
Special Review Use -Residential Unit
Valley Wide Plumbing and Heating
Lot 12, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
sanitation, and sleeping. Such a dwelling is an accessory use to the main dwelling
or use of the lot and shall not be sold separately."
"Dwelling unit means (a) one or more rooms, including cooking facilities, intended
of designed for occupancy by a family or guests independent of other families or
guests.. .
Plans for conversion of this storage and mechanical area to a residential unit have not been
submitted for review.
Even though this project appears to have parking problems, it does exceed the code
requirements for parking, and would have enough for a permanent resident should this
request be approved.
Following are the criteria, as listed in Section 17.48.040, to consider for approval of a
special review use:
A Whether the proposed use otherwise complies with all requirements imposed by the
zoning code,
COMMENT The proposed use, as it exists, does not comply with the Zoning or Uniform
Building Code. The applicant has not provided the Town with plans for converting this
area to a residential unit
B Whether the proposed use is in conformance with the town comprehensive plan,
QQdMENT. The proposed use meets the intent of some of the Comprehensive Plan
goals.
C Whether the proposed use is compatible with adjacent uses. Such compatibility may
be expressed in appearance, architectural scale and features, site design, and the control of
any adverse impacts including noise, dust, odor, lighting, traffic, safety, etc
C-09SIENT This is a compatible use with adjacent uses
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission adopt Resolution 94-32, which
approves the Special Review Use with conditions
1�N
Planning and Luning Commission Staff Report
December 6, 1994
Special Review Use -Residential Unit
Valley Wide Plumbing and Heating
Lot 12, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
1 Introduce Application
2 Applicant Presentation
3. Open Public Hearing
4 Close Public Hearing
?. Commission Review
6 Commission Action
Respectfully Submitted,
l
Many Holden
Town Planner
RECOMMENDED ACTION
PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION:
Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions (✓)
Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( )
Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( )
Date 1p Q5ue Railton, Secretary
Commission approved with the following conditions and findings: _
FINDINGS:
Q ThP prnT-+ i,ca must romnly with all ron,jiremp_ ntc imTnted
by the Zoning or Uniform Building Code.
B. The proposed use is consistent with the objectives and
purposes of t e compre- enslve p an; an
C. The proposed use is designed to be compatible with the
surrounding land uses ianuses In t— el -i area.
1. No person may occupy the basement area until it complies
with all applicable codes.
2. The applicant must submit construction plans for converting
the storage area into a residential unit fort Town review,
approval and issuance of a building permit. These plans
must be submitted to the Town of Avon within 30 days of
the Special Review Use approval. Please refer to back -over
APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL REVIEW USE
The undersigned hereby requests that a SPECIAL REVIEW USE be granted in accordance with
the terms of the Town of Avon Municipal Code. In support of this application, the
undersigned states:
1. The Special Review Use requested is: To have a caret.akpr I i ve nn gremig9os
2. Legal description of property: Lot 12, Block 1, BMRC
3. Address of property is: 431 Metcalf Road, Avon Colorado
4. Owner of described property: Thomas S. D'A22stino _
5. Applicant for Special Review Use: Cardom Holuir �. :.
6. Zoning classification of property: Commerci,-
7. Existing improvements on property consist of: Landscaping, Paved parking lot
8. Duration of proposed Special Review Use is
PermanenL Temporary Years
9. There is hereby attached a list of the names and addresses of all property owners
within 300 feet of the property upon which the Special Use permit is requested,
and the required notices for mailing and posting.
10. Additional comments: Rased on oast incidences. we wnrtA tike to have a
caretaker on the Premises to watch against burglary.
We also provide 24 hour on- ali c rvire: this would makethinns mu •t, _
easier.
I do hereby certify that the above statements
signed as an acknowledgement of that fact. I
or authorized to act as agent for the owner.
��o,4 -!" j,,.t
Applicant
AT&Fe s one Number—
Date
are true and correct and the application is
am the owner of the above described property
Owner
Address & Phone Number
I
Dated
'vr
rim
TOWN OF AVON
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 94 - 32
SERIES OF 1994
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SPECIAL REVIEW USE, FOR A
RESIDENTIAL UNIT LOT 12, BLOCK I, BENCHMARK
AT BEAVER CREEK, TOWN OF AVON, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO
WHEREAS, Thomas S. D'Agostino, owner of Lot 12 , Block 1, Benchmark at
Beaver Creek, has applied for a Special Review Use to allow for a residential unit on
Lot 1: , Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek, and
WI IEREAS, this location is zoned Industrial/Commercial, in which residential units
may be approved as a Special Review Use, and,
WHEREAS, a public hearing has been held by the Planning and Zoning Commission of
the Town of Avon, pursuant to notices required by law, at which time the applicant and the
public were given an opportunity to express their opinions and present certain information and
reports regarding tite proposed Special Review Use application for a residential unit, and
WHEREAS, following such public hearing and consideration of such information as
presented, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds as follows
A. The proposed use must comply with all requirements imposed
by the Zoning or Uniform Building Code;
B. The proposed use is consistent with the objectives and purposes of the
comprehensive plan; and
I
RESOLUTION NO. 94 - 32
SERIES OF 1994
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SPECIAL REVIEW USE, FOR A
RESIDENTIAL UNIT LOT 12, BLOCK 1, BENCHMARK
AT BEAVER CREEK, TOWN OF AVON, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO
WHEREAS, Thomas S. D'Agostino, owner of Lot 12 , Block I, Benchmark at
Beaver Creek, has applied for a Special Review Use to allow for a residential unit on
Lot 12, Block I, Benchmark at Beaver Creek; and
WI IEREAS, this location is zoned Industrial/Commercial, in which residential units
may be approved as a Special Review Use; and;
WHEREAS, a public hearing has be •n held by the Planning and Zoning Commission of
the Town of Avon, pursuant to notices required by law, at which time the applicant and the
public were given an opportunity to express their opinions and present certain information and
reports regarding the proposed Special Review Use application for a residential unit; and
WHEREAS, following such public hearing and consideration of such information as
presented, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds as follows:
A. The proposed use must comply with all requirements imposed
by the Zoning or Uniform Building Code,
B The proposed use is consistent with the objectives ai:d purposes of the
comprehensive plan; and
C. The proposed use is designed to be compatible with the surrounding land
uses and uses in the area.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning and Zoning Commission of
the Town of Avon, Colorado, hereby approves the requested Special Review Use for Lot 12,
Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek, Town of Avon, Eagle County, Colorado, subject to
the following conditions:
1. No person may occupy the basement area until it complies with all applicable codes.
2 The applicant must submit construction plans for converting the storage area into a
residential unit for Town review, approval and issuance of a building permit. These plans
must be submitted to the Town of Avon within 30 days of the Sp,Xial Review Use
approval.
3 Construction plans for the addition of the bathroom must be submitted to the Town within
seven working days from the date of this approval for review, approval and issuance of a
building permit
AD011I ED "fl IIS b L?, DAY OF_ 1994
_1
Setretary — --
••1'L;.:.,1.,- JNu moi: I�- u,
the following conditions:
to
1. No person may occupy the basement area until it complies with all applicable codes.
2. The applicant must submit construction plans for converting the storage area into a
residential unit for Town review, approval and issuance of a building permit. These plans
must be submitted to the Town of Avon within 30 days of the Special Review Use
approval.
Construction plans for the addition of the bathroom must be submitted to the Town within
seven working days from the date of this approval for review, approval and issuance of a
building permit.
ADOPTED THIS_ 611"Z4 _DAY OF 1994
SCt;retary Chai a
PLANNING aND ZONING COMMISSION STAFEPORT
December 6, 1994
Lot 14/15, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Vail -Avon Commercial Park
Variance - Building Height
PROJECT TYPE: Warehouse/Mini Storage
ZONING: IC COMPLIES WITH ZONING? No, Requires a
Variance to Building Height Requirements
This is a Public Hearing for a variance to the Building Height, on Lot 14/15, Block
1, Benchmark at Braver Creek.
INTRODUCTION:
A building height variance was granted for this project on July 6, 1993, to exceed the
maximum height of 48' for the IC Zone District by 4'. The plans submitted for the
C'ommission's review did not reflect the ridgeline of the building, which makes the
building 54' high.
REQUEST:
Mark Donaldson has submitted an application requesting approval of a variance to exceed
the estab!ished building height of 52' by two feet for total building height of 54'.
STAFF COMMENTS:
Before acting on a variance application, the Commission shall consider the following
factors with respect to the requested variance
Section 17.36.40, Aonrm al_Critgria,
A. The relationship of the requested variance to existing and potential uses and
structures in the vicinits.
m sM A height variance was granted f'or this project already and they are requesting
an additional two feet
B. The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation and
enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibly and
uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity.
Comms The degree of reliel'being sought is two fret o•.er the approved height variance
for this project
C. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population,
transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAF! .cEPOR T
December 6, 1994
Lot 14115, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Vail -Avon Commercial Park
Variance - Building Height
Comment. The effect of the request may have no negative impacts on light, air,
population, transportation, traffic facilities, public facilities,, utilities or public safety.
D. Such other factors and criteria as the Commission deems applicable to the
requested variance.
Comment. Staff has not identified any other factors for the Commission to consider.
FINDINGS REQUIRED:
The Planning and Zoning Commission shall make the following findings before granting a
variance:
A. That the granting of thr variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege
inconsistent with the limitaiions on other properties in the vicinity.
B. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health,
safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the
vicinity.
C. Thal the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons:
i. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the regulation would
result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the
objectives of this title;
ii. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to
the site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the
vicinity;
iii. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation
would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties
in the vicinity.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND FINDINGS:
Staff aecommendation is ror adoption of Resolution No. 94-30 that approves the
requested variance to the existing building height variance
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
I Introduce Application
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFI _cEPORT
December 6, 1994
Lot 14/15, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Vail -Avon Commercial Park
Variance - Building Height
2. Applicant Presentation
3. Open Public Hearing
4. Close Public Hearing
5. Commission Review
6. Commission Action
Respectfully submitted,
Maiy Holden
Town Planner
PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION:
Approved as submitted ( /) Approved with recommended conditions ( )
Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( )
Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( )
Date Sue Railton, Secretary 46c A-ee-GG _
The _CQMis5ioM_G1ppruved �s submitted
APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE
The undersigned hereby requests that a VARIANCE from the terms of the Town of Avon
Municipal Code be granted. In support o0tTiis application, the undersigned states:
1. The specific
variance
requested is
to exceed the 48 foot Building
height
by
six (6)
feet.
2. Legal description of property:
Creek Subdivision
Lot 14/15 Block 1 , Benchmark at Beaver
Town of Avo
3. Address of property: 371/391 Metcalf Rd.
4. Owner of described property: Edwin Gummelt & T.J. Conners
5. Applicant for variance: Victor Mark Donaldson Architects, P.C.
6. Zoning classification of property: Industrial — Commercial
7.. Existing improvements on propArty consist of: Construction in
process
8. The duration of the proposed variance is: Permanent x Temporary _ Years
9. The following practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship, inconsistent with
the objectives of the particular regulation would result from the strict, literal
interpretation and enforcement of the regulation:
B. Although the Developer issued the same plans that the Town.
of Avon based their original Design Review Approval uron to
the General contractor, these plans were apparently lacking
sufficient inforaatio.n. for the General Contractor to conform
to the actual wr!tten language of the previous Building Height
Variance granted. Therefore, to require strict conformance
at this time would cause the owner end his contract
Purchasers financial or pecuniary los, that would be out of
Proportion with the cost of correction of this construction
error.
10. The following exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to
the site do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone district:
10. Collectively, the encroachment of the twenty five fent
roadway easement and the one hundred foot powerline easement
along the East property line and the steepness of the
topography requires a more vertical structure with such a
limited building area.
11. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation woula
deprive the applicant of the following privileges enjoyed by the owners of other
properties in the same district:
11. Rather than construct multiple buildings which would
Produce more significant areas of
level site !mpsct to achieve a
of development similar to neighboring projects. we
propose this Building Height Increase to allow such
development in a single building on this site
APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE, PAGE 2
12. There is hereby attached a list of the names and addresses of all property owners
within 300 feet of the property upon which the variance is requested, and required
notices for mailing and posting.
I do hereby
certify that the above statements are true
and correct, and this application
is signed as
an acknowledgement of that
fact. I am the
owner of the above described
property or
authorized to act as agent
for the owner.
y icor- MA
L MWP51oN
P C.
T T CGA
Applicant
ner
� 2 C _
�x s3oh �4Yop, etaX
Address & P
one Num er cr�lp_52�
ress & Phone Number
(I IIAI 7f/,,/-
it
_
Dated
-11/
Date-
y
have examined this application and it has been accepted or rejected for the following
reasons:
Zoning Official
Date Filed Fee Paid Date Posted
Hearing Date Received By
1/86
DEC -01-1994 09:13 P.01
5r!'ivta�. �••.. r+v
To: Avon Plrnni"S and Z-onrng Cornmiaston
C/o Town ('IcA, Tnwn of Avon
P.O. Box 75, Avow, CO 81620
Re: Public Roaring, ik+ctynber lith, 1994' at 7:30 p.m.
Subject Property Owner: TJ. Conners and F:3win CvElm-e"
P.Q. B,^ 548, Vail, GO 81658
Lcgul Dcuccription Of Subject Property: Lots 14 & 15, Dlock 1, Dcnchtnark at Ii &Ycr
Cmk. Avon. CO.
We we the ownon of 1jotat 16 & 17, Block 1, Benehnm* at Bcev'T CYcek, Avon, CO
()mown as Avon Business Service Center, 331 Metcalf Road, Avtm, CO), which arc adjacent to
the subject property.
We wish to cot" into the record that we oppuse ar 7 he intention of the new
8u'1 c for the subject pmperty the two
inctcwae of the build height Roan the variance already gru►tod appeared o . changing
glory building into a three story building. Such a request. stould be denied.
Joyce Wilson of Mountain properties Associates wdt"r our counxel will rspreseat us at
the hearing.
(? L9�-f
I
Gtmcnl Partner
ABSC Limited Partnership
DEC -01-1994 09:09
Post -IP Fax Notes 7671
Cr�"�7
V C/o Town C Jerk, Town of Avon
P.O. Bos 75, Avon, CO 81620
Re: Public Hearing, flocemher 6th. 1994, at 7:70 p.m.
Subject Property Owner: TJ. Conners and Edwin Cummolt
P.O. Bias 548, Vail, CO 81658
Lcbnkl Description of Subjcct Prvperty: Lots 14 & 15, D1ock 1, Dwchmark at lioa.os
Creek. Avon. CO.
We aro the owner of Lou+ 16 & 17, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek, AV,m, CO
(known as Avon Business Service C utcr. 331 Metcalf Road, Avrnr, CO), which arc adjacent to
the subjoct propeItY.
C
We wish to color inti the rocgrti that we �puse "a a li request to CLCodd.thS7bc intention of the new
.. , • .. _: _•.. ..rbc 7 t1. l ti0" for the aubjcct property.
Bu oQ nily y ncd to be changing the two
increase of the build height from the variance already grantedPPS
glory building into a three story building. Such a "ucst. should be denied.
Joyce Wilson of Mountain Propertics Asaociatr:s and/or our co"A' will represWl us at
the hearLig.
General Partner
ABSC Limited Partreruhip
�.u�/ i����pa"s 2
Pott -1P Fax Note 7671 -
F
Fa+•
WIN
i
C
410
TOWN OF AVON
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 94 - 30
SERIES OF 1994
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE, TO THE
BUILDING HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS, AS STIPULATED IN TITLE 17,
OF TME AVON MUNICIPAL CODE FOR LOT 14/15, BLOCK 1,
BENCHMARK AT BEAVER CREEK SUBDIVISION,
TOWN OF AVON, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO
WHEREAS, T.J. Conners and Edwin Gummelt Jr., owners of Lot 14/15 , Block 1,
Benchmark at Beaver Creek, have app! ed for a variance from the maximum building height
requirements as stipulated in Title 17, of the Avon Municipal Code, and
WHEREAS, a public hearing has been held by the Planning and Zoning Commission of
the Town of Avon, pursuant to notices required by law, at which time the applicant and the
public were given an opportunity to express their opinions and present certain information and
reports regarding the proposed Building Height Variance application and has considered:
1. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and
structures in the vicinity,
2 The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of
a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment
among sites in the vicinity, or to attain the objectives of this title without grant of special
privilege;
3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population,
transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety;
4. Such other factors and criteria as the r` mr,rission deems applicable to thu proposed
iVV. 94 —.io
SERIES OF 1994
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE, TO THE
BUILDING HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS, AS STIPULATED IN TITLE 17,
OF THE AVON MUNICIPAL CODE FOR LOT 14/15, BLOCK 1,
BENCHMARK AT BEAVER CREEK SUBDIVISION,
TOWN OF AVON, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO
WHEREAS, T.1. Conners and Edwin Gummelt Jr., owners of Lot 14/15 , Block 1,
Benchn;ark at Beaver Creek, have applied for a variance from the maximum building height
regmsements as stipulated in Title 17, of the Avon Municipal Code, and
WHEREAS, a public hearing has been held by the Planning and Zoning Commission of
the Town of Avon, pursuant to notices required by law, at which time the applicant and the
public were given an opportunity to express their opinions and present certain information and
reports regarding the proposed Building Height Variance application and has considered:
I 'I he relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and
structures in the vicinity,
'I he degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of
a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity oCtreatment
among sites in the vicinity, or to attain the objectives of this title witho. ' grant of special
privilege,
3 The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population,
transportation and trallic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety,
4 Such other factors and criteria as the Commission deems applicable to the proposed
variance
WHEREAS, the Planting and Zoning Commission finds:
A. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special
privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties in the vicinity.
B. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
C. That the variance is warranted for the following reason:
i The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the regulation would result in
practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives
of this title,
NOW, 111FREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning and Zoning Commission of
the Town of Avon, Colorado, hereby approves the requested variance from the building height
regulation of Title 17 of the Avon Municipal Code for Lot 14/15, Block I, Benchmark at Beaver
Creek, Town of Avon, Fagle County, Colorado, subject to the Ii)llowing condition
1 The building height may not exceed 54 feet
ADOPTED THIS ---DAN' OF e wf7r!�/ 1994
Secretary
welfare, or materially injurious to properties or impruvcments in the vicinity.
C. That the variance is warranted for the following reason:
i. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the regulation would result in
practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the ob;eciives
of this title,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning and Zoning Conunission of
the Town of Avon, Colorado, hereby approves the requested variance from the building height
regulation of Title 17 of the Avon Municipal Code for Lot 14/15, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver
Creek, Town of Avon, Eagle County, Colorado, subject to the following condition:
I The building height may not exceed 54 feet.
ADOPTED THIS
_ DAY OF 1994
Secretary
PLANNING Ai -40 ZONING COMMISSION STAFF ..r;PORT
December 6, 1994
Lot 14/15, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Vail -Avon Commercial Park
Variance - Parking
PROJECT TYPE: Warehouse/Mini Storage
ZONING: IC COMPLIES WITH ZONING? No, Requires a
Variance to the Parking Requirements
This is a Public Hearing for a variance to the Parking Requirements, on Lot 14/15,
Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
INTRODUCTION:
A parking variance was granted for this project on July 6, 1993, to reduce the required
number of parking spaces by fourteen creating a requirement of 58 spaces. The fourteen
space reduction was applied to the mini -storage and not the industrial use. Approval of
the variance was based on 28,800 square feet of mini -storage and 28,600 square feet of
industrial use.
REQUEST:
Mark Donaldson has submitted an application requesting approval of a variance to the
parking requirements. Additional industrial use square footage is being proposed through
the addition of mezzanine levels The mezzanine levels will be added in the first and
second floors. Following is a breakdown of the approved building square footage and the
proposed square feet
SQUARE FEET ORIGINAL PROPOSED
Mini -Storage 28,800 27,055
Ind ri I Use 28 600 35.421
Total Sq Ft 57,400 62,476
Proposed Additional Sq. Ft.
5,076
CURRENT PARKIN(: REQUIRED PROPOSED VARIANCE
Industrial Use I per 800 36 36 p
Mini- Warehougg_J.-pgr800 _ 36_ " -14
Total 72 58 -14
REQUESTED
PARKING VARIANCE REQUIRED PROPOSED VARIANCE
Industrial Use
I per 800
45
50
+ 5
Mini -Warehouse
1 pgE 800__
34
7
-27
Total
79
57
-22
r
PLANNING Agri) ZONING COMMISSION STAFF ..SPORT
December 6, 1994
Lot 14/15, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Vail -Avon Commercial Park
Variance - Parking
STAFF COMMENTS:
The applicant is proposing to increase the square footage of the industrial use, decrease
the square footage of the mini -warehouse and reduce the number of required parking
spaces.
The applicant has cited, as one reason for approval of this request, Resolution 89-10 that
granted a parking variance to the Avon Self Storage Mini -Warehouse project. Approval
was granted allowing the applicant to provide approximately I spaces per 4,114 square
feet. However, the Avon Self Storage Mini -Warehouse does not contain a mixture of
uses and the drive aisles are 24' in width with six loading spaces on one side
The variance request has come about due to the additional square footage created by the
proposed mezzanine levels. The addition of the square footage increases the impacts to
the site, such as parking and circulation. Projects must be designed to accommodate the
development occurring on the site The addition of the mezzanine levels coinciding with
the parking variance request indicates that additional square footage can not be
accommodated on this site
Before acting on a variance application, the Commission shall consider the following
factors with respect to the requested variance
Section 17.36.40. Approval Criteria
A. The relationship of the requested variance to existing and potential uses and
structures in the vicinity.
Comment This site has already received a parking variance and to further reduce the
requirement may be detrimental to Town Rights -of -Way and surrounding properties by
overflow of cars and trucks
B. The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation and
enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibly and
uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity.
Q4mm nit The degree of relief being sought is more than necessary Additional square
footage was not originally planned for on the site and is being retrofitted The variance
granted for the other self storage mini -warehouse is not the same situation in that it did
not contain mired uses and has adequate site circulation The granting of this variance
would not achieve compatible and uniform treatment among sites in the vicinity
C. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population,
transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety.
PLANNING ANb ZONING COMMISSION STAFF ..r.PORT
December 6, 1994
Lot 14/15, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Vail -Avon Commercial Park
Variance - Parking
Comment_ The granting of this variance would have a detrimental effect on the adjacent
road by not being able to accommodate the flow or parking of cars. Thus, creating a
potential for traffic and public safety concerns
D. Such other factors and criteria as the Commission deems applicable to the
requested variance.
Comment. Staff recommends the Commission consider how the site will work wish the
other projects in the vicinity should this the parking requirement be further reduced.
FINDINGS REQUIRED:
The Planning and Zoning Commission shall make the following findings before granting a
variance.
A. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege
inconsistent with the limitations on other properties in th? vicinity.
B. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health,
safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to praperties or improvements in the
vicinity.
C. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons:
i. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the regulation would
result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the
objectives of this title;
ii. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to
the site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the
vicinity;
iii. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcem-qt of the specified regulation
would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the--.vners of other properties
in the vicinity.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND FINDINGS:
Staff recommendation is for adoption of Resolution No 94-31 that denief the requested
parking variance
PLANNING f_iD ZONING COMMISSION STAFF ..SPORT
December 6, 1 O94
Lot 14/15, Plo*k I, Benchmark at Braver Creek
Vail -Avon Commerciai Park
Variance - Parking
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
1. Introduce Application
;t
2. Applicant Presentation
3. Open Public Hearing
4. Close Public Hearing
5. Commission Review
6. Commission Action
Respectfully submitted,
Mary Holden
Town Planner
PLANNING AND TONING ACTION:
Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions (.�f
Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( )
Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( )
Dated 6_ /q _:Sue Railton, Secretary
The Commission approved with the following conditions:
1. the variance is for 21 spaces based upon a mini -storage
Z. industrial/commercial area of 35,421 square feet with all
the variance allocated to the mini -storage portio-- n.
3. The mini -storage area shall be clearly designated on the
Final Condominium Map.
303/949-5200
FAX/949-5205
—— VICTOR MARK DONALDSON ARCHITECTS, P.C.
ARCHITECTURE • PLANNING • INTERIORS Dox 5300 • Avon, Colorado 81620
November 29. 199"_
NS. NARY HOLDEN. TOWN PLAN`:?:r!
Town of Avon
Avon. Cc'_orado
Re. Vail!Avon Commercial. Park
Lot 14!15. Block I
Benchmark at Bearer Creek Subdivision
Sear Marv:
Please find enclosed 3 sets of undated
Dian.. and exterior elevation, for the abc.
These d-•awin¢s are to su'--port the varian,.
we
have submitted foarki.^.g and build:^.g he:.•':- ... .., vheard in
a Public Rearing or December 6. 1994.
We have prepared these drawings based on recent -built
surveys prepared by - '-ice::sed Colorado surveyor and the
Pre.vicus desien approved. Please let me knew if you have any
questions or-,omments re¢ardi.^.g our calculations or any other
i.nformatic...
The R:'dine '?eight Variance is to allow the height to be
increased from 48' to 54' ;52' ......nusly aooroyed; The
e is to
nroiect beygranted s
'km_'the " °;toraCe Portion of the
^^ nr;ve ege as the Avon Self -
Storage nroiect or. Nottineham Road IIC Zone nist^ictl w!'ich is
documented in Tow.^. of Avon Resolution 69 10. We are roDosin^
a total of seven oarkl^.¢ spaces for less than 2I 000 s a
cu re
feet of net !easab!e square footage.
Please
�•^w that we ..re
continuing to
address
all other
nor.-car.forz'.r
.ssues that have
been raised
by
your
staff and
w' -l'-
supplement
your information
for
.. Design
Review u:, f
.ion hearing on
December 20.
_994.
As-
always
we will s ..
close touch with
you on our
proposed
solutions
tc. these -....
Thar.^.k you for ;our cooperation In this difficult Process.
t."
Res P 3t:bmitted.
i*c Mark Do^.3'.dsor. AIA
Pres_'to,
VICTOR MARK DONALDSON ARCHITECTS. P.C.
e.r.c: I- noted herein.
CC: Mr. T.J. Corners
APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE
The undersigned hereby requests that a VARIANCE from the terms of the Town of Avon
Municipal Code be granted. In,support o tis application, the undersigned states:
1. The specific variance requested is To reduce the parking requirements for
• Mini Storage Warehousing
2. Legal description of property: Lot 14/15 Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver
Creek Subdivision Town of 'Avon
3. Address of property: 371/391 Metcalf Rd.
4. O:vner of described property: Edwin Gummelt , T.J. Conners
A
5. Applicant for variance - Victor,Marlk Donaldson Architects P.C.
6. Zoning classification of property: Industrial - Commercial
t
-7.. Ex, sting improvements on property consist of: Construction i:S.process
8. The, duration of the .proposed variance is: Permanent x Temporary Years
9. The following practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship, inconsistent with
the objectives f the particular regulation would result from the strict, literal
interpretation and enforcement of the regulation:
9. The complexity. difficulty and potential site impacts
outweigh the strict and literal far
interpretation of parking
requirements. The construction of additional. unnecessary
Parking spaces would not be of benefit to the users and the
reduction in parking for this single use is appropriate.
10. The following exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to
the site do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone district:
10. The unusual nature of the mini -storage warehouse industry
simply does not require the amount of parking prescribed in
Title 17 for the general uses in the Industrial Commerci
Zone District. al
11. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would
deprive the applicant of the following privileges enjoyed by the owners of other
properties in the same district:
11. The mini -storage component of this protect will operate
in a substantially similar manner as the Avon. Self -Storage
Facility In this (IC) Zone District. The parking requirements j
for the balance of this project will conform to the specific I— — — -
requirements as set forth in this Zone District.
C
M
ar
APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE, PAGE 2
12. There is hereby attached a list of the names and addresses of all property owners
within 300 feet of the property upon which the variance is requested, and required
notices for mailing and posting.
I do hereby certify that the above statements are true and correct, and this application
is signed as an acknowledgement of that fact. I am the owner of the above described
property or authorized to act as agent for the owner.
)(Mr--- c. T /�/
pp scant Owner e-2 C
A�5:0 J iQyb�1 j G0 , 4140D '0Address & P one Num er al� W00 ress one Num er
Dated 1,8 74 //- ,- gy
Dated
I have examined this application and it has been accepted or rejected for the following
reasons:
Zoning Official
Date Filed
Hearing Date
1/86
Fee Paid
Received By
ated -
Date Posted
•
DEC -01-1994 09:13 p,02
To: Avon Plannvt8 and Zen" C"°mrnisai"n
do Town Clerk, Town Of Awn
P.O. B" 750 Avon, CO 81620
30
Eta: Public Hr+erinS, p�tbCr 61h, 1904, d 7' p -m.
T.J. Coanera and Bdw n C,urnmalt.
subjat Prop«tY Owner: p,(). 11ox 548, Wail, CO 81658
p�ttsTiptiun of Subject property: job 14 do 15, Bloch 1. Benchmark at Beaver
Legal Creek, Avon. CO.
Benchmark at )leave* Creels, Avon. CO
We are the ov+nct+ of l.ou 16 do 17. Rleek 11 Avon, (X)), which arc adjacent to
(known as Avon Business Sorvtcc Cir, 331 Metcalf Road,
ft eubjoct property
We wish to enter int" the mord that we op"
for the subject
u atiieica In Ty of the Avan MrntJ4ina as the building
Harkin¢ ra9�i — —was ally �tcd a vanamc on perklag spaces
property. t tte subject ptopen ft. of floor space
was originally proPaed. Now. the new plan calls for an additional a� will certainly create a
This new Tc
4u ,rr"vidittg additional adequate parking sptx°r' u. Such a regtrest should be denied-
sevcrc parking situation for all the ncighborft PriMcrb `
joy, Wilson of Mountain Properties Assaaiates and/or ow coanscl will represent
uc at
the ht erring•
DEC -01-1994 0908
RECov,
001
ED
19g9
�MMVNli7' pEVE[ oPMEryI
General Partcer
ABSC Limitud Partrenihip
UMIN
To: Avon--
o/o Town Cleric, Town Avon
81620
P.O. Hoa 73, Avon,
CO
Re:
Public Hearing, I)ooct»ber 6th. 1994, 730
T.J. Camera and Edwin C,utrMs'+elt
r.O• plot 548, Vail, CO 81658
Lots 14 Ac 15, Block 1. Benchmark at heave'
Crede, Avco, CO.
Subject ProPerty Ovm""
Legal
Dcss riptioc of Subject Property=
mwn
16 do 17, Abele 1, ROnehmark at Hoavar Creak, Avon, CO
*new en of Lots Sake Center. 331 Metcalf Road, Avon, M), which sic
(Wwwa as Avow c Dadjacent to
We are the
the subject praparty-
"Um
t3�t
We wish to enter into the record that '"� the Avon Mwiola 1 ws- tbr the auticcl
)e...t i e 17 of ths�� - -
paLlc i+g^ro9� On a va iaaec an parking tpaecc as the building
i'he subject peoPatY war already granted R, of floor "Pace
1�PertY slow, the new plan ca11+t for an additional SOOt? a4
was originally PmP°s� Thi" new request will certainly ereatc a
without providing additional adequate parinng >�a a� Such a request should be denied.
nyQc Patlting "ituation for all the neighboring V�b
Joyce Wim of Mountain Pr1whem Associates and/or ow coun+cl will represent us at
the hearing.
Ctenenl Pamer
A.BSC ] jm,tod PartnembiP
o E�
1 7994
�MMNNIIy p£Vf/oPv-NT
Fa
T07RL P.02
TOWN OF AVON
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 94 - 31
SERIES OF 1994
A RESOLUTION DENYING A VARIANCE, TO THE
PARKING REQUIREMENTS, AS STIPULATED IN TITLE 17,
OF THE AVON MUNICIPAL CODE FOR IAT 14/15, BLOCK I,
BENCHMARK AT BEAVER CREEK SUBDIVISION,
TOWN OF AVON, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO
WHEREAS, T.J. Conners and Edwin Gummelt Jr., owners of Lot 14/15 , Block I,
Benchmark at Beaver Creek, have applied for a variance from the parking
requirements as stipulated in Title 17, of the Avon Municipal Code, and
WHEREAS, a public hearing has been held by the Planning and Zoning Commission of
the Town of Avon, pursuant to notices required by law, at which time the applicant and the
public were given an opportunity to express their opinions and present certain information and
reports regarding the proposed Parking Variance application and has considered:
I The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and
structures in the vicinity,
2 The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of
a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment
among sites in the vicinity, or to attain the objectives of this title without grant of special
privilege:.
3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population,
transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety;
4. Such other factors and criteria as the Commission deems hpplicabie to the proposed
s
SERIES OF 1994
A RESOLUTION DENYING A VARIANCE, TO THE
PARKING REQUIREMENTS, AS STIPULATED IN TITLE 17,
OF THE AVON MUNICIPAL CODE FOR LOT 14/15, BLOCK I,
BENCHMARK AT BEAVER CREEK SUBDIVISION,
TOWN OF AVON, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO
WI-IEREAS, T.J. Conners and Edwin Gummelt Jr., owners of Lot 14/15 , Block 1,
Benchmark at Beaver Creek, have applied for a variance from the parking
requirements as stipulated in Title 17, of the Avon Municipal Code, and
WHEREAS, a public hearing has been held by the Planning and Zoning Commission of
the Town of Avon, pursuant to notices requi-ed by law, at which time the applicant and the
public were given an opportunity to express their opinions and present certain information and
reports regarding the proposed Parking Variance application and has considered:
1 The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and
structures in the vicinity.
2 The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation and enforcemert of
a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment
among sites in the vicinity, or to attain the objectives of this tide without grant of special
privilege,
3 The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of ponuiation,
transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety,
4. Such other factors and criteria as the Commission deems applicable to the proposed
variance
W
A^%
WI-iEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds:
A. That the granting of the variance will constitute a grant of special
privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties in the vicinity.
B. That the granting of the variance will be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
C. That the variance is not warranted for the following reasons:
i. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the regulation would not result in
practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this
title,
ii. There are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to
the site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the vicinity,
iii. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would
not deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the
vicinity
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning and Zoning Commission of
the Town of Avon, Colorado, hereby denies the requested variance from the parking
requirements of Title 17 of the Avon Municipal Code for Lot 14/15, Block 1, Benchmark at
Beaver Creek, Town of Avon, Eagle County, Colorado.
ADOPTED THIS _ --------DAY OF 1994
Secretary
Chairman
Welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
C. That the variance is not warranted for the following reasons:
i. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the regulation would not result in
practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this
title;
ii. There are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions .applicable to
the site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the vicinity,
iii. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified rebnilation would
not deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the
vicinity.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning and Zoning Commission of
the Town of Avon, Colorado, hereby denies the requested variance fi om the parking
requirements of Title 17 of the Avon Municipal Code for Lot 14/15, Biock I, Benchmark at
Beaver Creek, Town of Avon, Eagle County, Colorado.
ADOPTED THIS ----DAY OF 1994
Secretary
Chairman
�1
PLANNING A,41) ZONING COMMISSION STAFh REPORT
December 6, 1994
Lot 67, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Recycle Shed Placement at City Market
Final Design Review - Recycle Shed
PROJECT TYPE: Commercial ZONING: SC
COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES
INTRODUCTION:
BFI Waste Systems has submitted an application requesting approval of a shed to replace
the existing recycle containers on the southwest corner of the City Market parking lot.
STAFF COMMENTS:
The shed will have gray asphalt shingles and off-white grooved siding. Please refer to the
pictures attached to the staff report
Accessory buildings are allowed in every zone district subject to the following criteria:
"A. An accessory building is defined as a subordinate building, the use of which is
customarily incidental to that of the principal building or to principal use of the
land and which is located on the same lot or parcel with the principal building or
use. Accessory buildings shall not be provided with kitchen or bath Facilities
sufficient to render them suitable for permanent residential occupancy. Approval
of the Planning and Zoning Commission and a building permit is required."
The Design Rules, Regulations and Procedures state, "Temporary structures incluu'ing
excavated basements, construction storage and offi^e trailers, and tents shall not bs,
allowed except as may be determined to be necessary during construction "
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Commission approve the application with the following condition
I The shed be painted to match the main structure
2 The site be kept clean and free of trash and debris
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
I Introduce Application
2. Applicart Presentation
3. Commission Review
PLANNING AwD ZONING COMMISSION STAFF ..SPORT
December 6, 1994
Lot 67, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Recycle Shed Placement at City Market
Final Design Review - Recycle Shed
4. Commission Action
Respectfully submitted,
--Y , M
Mary Holden
Town Planner
PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION:
Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions (✓f
Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( )
Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( )
Date _�4 i2!- Sue Railton, Secretary_
___�heS4mtni_ssion aoaroved with the following conditions:
1. The shed be painted to match the main structure.
2. The site be kept clean and free of trash and debris.
Also a strong suggestion that an alternative site on the southeast
corner of the City Market Parking lot be ,found. z - - "
\1
'41
. to
\1
4OF
I
"I
49
0
e=
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
December 6, 1994
Lot 43- Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision
Bober Residence
Final Design Review - Temporary Fuel Tank Storage
PROJECT TYPE: Residential ZONING: PUD
COMPLIES WITH ZONING`' YES
INTRODUCTION:
Buz Reynolds Jr. has submitted an application requesting approval for placement of a 300
gallon diesel fuel tank for 6 months on Lot 43, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision.
STAFF COMMENTS:
The Design Review Rues, Regulations and Procedures stipulates, in Section 6.24, D. I.,
"Oil, gasoline or liquid petroleum gas tanks will not normally be permitted on or
aboveground. f emporary installations for a period not exceeding 2 years may be
approved provided the installation complies with all applicable regulations and is fully
screened from view form all public right-of-ways and neighboring properties "
The applicant must comply with all applicable Fire Codes and receive Fire Department
approval for the placement of the tank As of this November 29, 1994, the Fire
Department has not reviewed the proposed location
The type of screening indicated is the building under construction on this site
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Should the Commission approve the application with the following conditions are
recommend
I The applicant address Fire Department concerns which is that the tank be ievel
2 The fuel storage tank be fully screened
3 The fuel storage tank be removed within six nxinths from the date of ,approval
I Introduce Application
2 Applicant Presentation
3 Commission Review
4. Commission Action
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
PLANNING Arvll ZONING COMMISSION STAFF ,..=,PORT
December 6, 1994
Lot 43, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision
Bober Residence
Final Design Review - Temporary Fuel Tank Storage
Respectfully submitted,
y/)l a -"r
I
Mary Holden
Town Planner
PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION:
Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions (✓f
Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( )
Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( )
Dat. Sue Railton, Secretaiy
The CommisFion approved with the following conditions:
1. The applicant address Fire Department concerns which is that the
2. The fuel storage tank be fully screeneu.
3. The fuel storage tank be removed within six months from the
4. Location for the temporary fuel tank is screened naturally from view
LOT 44
PROPERTY Ii
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF KEPORT
December 6, 1994
Lot 3, Block 3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Westgate Building
Final Design Review -Addition of Exhaust Fans on Roof
PROJECT TYPE: Addition of Exhaust Fans on Roof
ZONING: PUD COMPLIES WITH ZONING? Yes
INTRODUCTION
The Landing restaurant is requesting approval for the placement of two exhaust fans on
the roof of the Westgate building. The applicant has presented two options for the
placement. The first location is on the northeast portion of the roof. In this location, the
fans are only visible from the north side of the building, which is Sunridge. The second
option is to place the fans in the domed area of the roof. This location would make the
fans visible from all points since they would be raised about 1 foot above the domed area.
In either location, the fans will be painted to match the roof color.
STAFF COMMENTS
The first option would appear to be best since it will be visible in only one location.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Commission approve this application, citing the option one location.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
I. Introduce Application
2. Applicant Presentation
3. Commission Review
4. Commission Action
Respectfully Submitted
Mary Holden
Town Planner
PLANNING Air;/ ZONING COMMISSION STAFF . ,. PORT
December 6, 1994
Lot 3, Block 3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Westgate Building
Final Design Review -Addition of Exhaust Fans on Roof
PLANNING AND ZONING ACTiON:
Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( )
Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( )
Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( )
Date A8G/QQ�, Sue Railton, Secretary � X "�
The Commission approved the location of the Exhaust Fans
on the northeast portion of the roof.
c,,IZZ 10'
:��c :.Jrlc..�/'7.v: � �iY✓6 ?�cc.+p Gx-yf-?/.e'us.—
f,lds✓S /u�c 7/�ic / ,Tc/frJ `juuij 1 /fed /71vs�
/5 %U /3,f 416- /J vC-T GJd4tc 67Xif"6 f%
U!i/Le/ //Y�:�Iur✓T OA-) T!�E SLUXv G [Y �is/o
1OEIJEirJ%
/ JJ// ,�iTu if T mit/
CUG l.VTEA✓QE/
�c zc% //- filE /[OD `c
// t vifJAE /<'!TIP/JQ f�','N T %%/Ef E / ♦.r .56i7Y E- -
iJIJ �, E CT /Oct. �c• TLL1/- OIL/
cuoEJ LVvi1a�� r i/A�/.6 .u` ��� O cJ�.T /.r✓1�.
&I l'�r
oo 0"2 c � El f it v 1t
/ E T <2 e—
/
OfN`E= vo T. 7fjeAr int SEL'<�IQ/!L CG,uG F� US Gv /i /tom
/f T /U,tJL / f
A!! />/aecTloctJs G/Jy, Ojr'To� -- -
�/
foac
�/l
COO Cc "r ,u
_—__ ___-_ _"'•.7. 1-_____/#-BLC____.-/i�/LE _-..-GQX�GF.a�.t d tom_ M-/l�rrT--a�-.Lli1l_S�LLrJ �-/�.Al
��vLl_.li SEE / -/Uv D/%/Kt•/1 -- - --- ��[f/.LtS�--lLL�2_
woo
-•�Iz----•cs f/E �os�TsJ - �� :c -cam:-- /F,JD _
C-5 7-11E. /_G A?EilluiJ- Q.uLG.f2/.r/G
/. 91111
jAt..s/_.—_�_
. lfirJ� d�J AST f� /l��frt_,
D1
w w
9—,6 „9—,6
i
I
119—SI 1
g
Z
C
<
Im
w
F
S
W
� U
W
�
I
1c,
J�
< G
I \
I
C
1
�
g
Z
C
Im
F
N
W
J
W
1c,
O
M
1
loi
Z
0
a
LU
W
W
c
y
0
F
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF stEPORT
December 6, 1994
Lot 3, Block 3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Westgate Building
Final Design Review -Modification to the Master Sign Program
PROJECT TYPE: Master Sign Program Modification
ZONING: PUD COMPLIES WITH ZONING? Yes
INTRODUCTION
Westgate received approval of their Master Sign Program on October 4, 1994 The
Master Sign Program specified approximateiy 183 square feet of sign area for the entire
building, including the freestanding sign Unit 105 was assigned 30 square feet placed on
the eastern end of the building. The Landing restaurant is requesting to modify the Master
Sign Program by adding one, 30 square foot sign, to be placed in the same area Attached
is the originally approved sign and location and the proposed signs and locations
STAFF COMMENTS
The additional sign square footage will bring the total square footage to 213 square feet
Does the Commission think this request is appropriate
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Should the Commission approve this application, Staff recommends the tollortiing
condition
I I he added sign comply with all provisions of the existing Master Sign Program
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
I Intruduce Application
Applicant Presentation
3 Commission Review
4 Commission .Action
Respectfully Submitted
Mary Holden
Town Planner
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF ..EPORT
Decembev 6, 1994
Lot 3, Block 3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Westgate Building
Final Design Review -Modification to the Master Sign Program
PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION:
Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions
Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( )
Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( )
Date 45 / Sue Railton, S-cretary �
The Commission approved with the following condtions:
1. The added sign comply with all provisions of the existing Master
-igrr Progratrr>
2. The illumination from the signs lighs are not a nuisance to the
— --------- stt�u"diftq—res44eaces and will E9 --P to staff �A,--reui-ew if a
nuisance.
G�>E J / /1 E OAF :, = ff�s U.qi' � .•9,.%� � /.v S/G.r/iiG l
.. • O/�'_ !/,/hE LIIN.L'.NG ///'=7/9 G: /Z/�etJ'LUt Alf li /w
.. f 26 E
12e-ASUn/S _
pCn' u.t_i d "' 7lfi� S /ice'::, -A i'?�✓J moo! �.
/H�
/le 4,.,e 44 u 7
-.12f 3,%.4 wof.e// /,ij .�, yri /Z sr L�
C /
.. �, / �J.G i ri/I/ v � I/l /D/1 4AiAa^ �.7.(Cf'•G •. w1L 1 L.�
Ile iI uli,V.v
i
COAdsr cZ GE.c%/C� �au C9.v
N if.vo /JE G7Avi'il.v% �[i/ec�� V/Gv Ai%F/ /c.�
%'if
007
oot
E "I'/ C n' C
eo OA-
14e
ti/4t —C
r,
'fAv- _/��ijii�'
----d-Th r12/ _. __-+�L�_ �•
---•=�� ----��FFz___�¢-[ZE'4..
,G'/l
�/C��---Z/r_E�
ZZ
/Ac.'tJ�t/.�
piLE � r
Loy of ,6 S1,6
�/1v-u_/�.gL'-__
2tiPSQrlliPfSLE
�Eit.0i9,GG
J�/ .---/fiJJ�1/Cd.QL� _,{a
_%r
L -AS! opt
Wt; �
2 W O
l.7 LL`
W
�i
.I
I
s
N
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
NI
m0
Ln
n
Ln
N
z
y J
4,
Vi -a
4`
I I
,I
I
I
I I
II
Fry
����C
M
W�
;i
C
2 S
oa
W
;o
W�S
I
O
II
®U�
z Z -
0
.I
I
s
N
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
NI
m0
Ln
n
Ln
N
z
y J
4,
Vi -a
4`
I I
,I
I
I
I I
II
Fry
����C
M
�b
N
v
a