The URL can be used to link to this page

PZC Packet 040594PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT April 5, 1994 Tract G, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Library Final Design Review PROJECT TYPE: Library ZONING: GPEH COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES INTRODUCTION: Pam Hopkins has submitted an application for Final Design review for the Avon Public Library on Tract G. T he library will be located west of the Seasons at Avon building, east of the Fire Station and south of the proposed Recreation Center. It will contain two levels and stand approximately 40-45' in height. The library will consist of the following materials Window Trim Door Door Trim Hand/Deck Rails Flues/Flashings Chimneys Other wood metal/wood wood metal metal stone/wood Peeler poles/stone veneer Colors will be provided at the meeting. Colors aged bronze presented at meeting 11 aged bronze light oak sand light oak saltillo stain & paint to match light oak match roof match roof rainbow mix/stain The landscape plant list is included in your packet It lists the proposed plant material and the plant material to be removed. Ground covers will consist of native materials. flowering perennials and sod The building entry and two outside patios will have special paving. An irrigation system is being proposed which will tie into the Town's park system. -'TAFF COMMe:NTS: The building is located approximately IT -20' from Benchmark Road and the roof will extend over the sidewalk causing potential snow shedding problems onto a public sidewalk. The Town requires a setback from all sidewalks for safety and maintenance Materials Roof standing seam metal Siding R. S. board and batten Other stone veneer Fascia metal Soffits 1x6 T&G Window clad Window Trim Door Door Trim Hand/Deck Rails Flues/Flashings Chimneys Other wood metal/wood wood metal metal stone/wood Peeler poles/stone veneer Colors will be provided at the meeting. Colors aged bronze presented at meeting 11 aged bronze light oak sand light oak saltillo stain & paint to match light oak match roof match roof rainbow mix/stain The landscape plant list is included in your packet It lists the proposed plant material and the plant material to be removed. Ground covers will consist of native materials. flowering perennials and sod The building entry and two outside patios will have special paving. An irrigation system is being proposed which will tie into the Town's park system. -'TAFF COMMe:NTS: The building is located approximately IT -20' from Benchmark Road and the roof will extend over the sidewalk causing potential snow shedding problems onto a public sidewalk. The Town requires a setback from all sidewalks for safety and maintenance =7 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT April 5, 1994 Tract G, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Library Final Design Review purposes. The Town has not deviated from this requirement in the past. The roof must be relocated to not extend over the sidewalk The proposed drainage plan must tie into the existing drainage in the area. Note #4 on the site plan states "Edge between Library site and pedestrian mall not yet fixed. Mall design by other." The library site plan needs to reflect the approved mall design. DESIGN REVIEW CONSIDERATIONS: The Commssion shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of this project: Conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable regulations of the Town. Comment This proposal is in conformance with Town codes The suitability of the improvement, including type and quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located. Comment The proposed improvement and materials are in keeping with the Design Guidelines and the surrounding area. The compatibility of the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties. Comment All impacts will be contained on site and tie into existing improvements. The compatibility of the proposed improvements with site topography. Comment The proposed improvements are compatible and sensitive with the site. The visual appearance of any proposed improvement as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. Comment The proposed building will not produce negative visual impacts with the surroundings The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. Comment The proposal meets the objective of this guideline PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT April 5, 1994 Tract G, Benchmarl at Beaver Creek Subdivision Library Final Design Review The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. Comment: The proposal is in conformance with the goals, policies and programs for the Town of Avon. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission approve this application with the following conditions 1. The roof overhang be relocated so as to not extend over the sidewalk. 2. The site plan reflect the approved pedestrian mall plan, and the Library site plan tie in with the pedestrian mall. 3. The proposed drainage plan tie in with the existing drainage plan for the area. 4. Building lighting be brought back for Commission approval. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully Submitted Mary Holden Town Planner PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT April 5, 1994 Tract G, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Library Final Design Review PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions (✓r Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) PIi`hdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date��J� /q94 Sue Railton, Secretary 44L{ The Commission gr;.n—ted final design approval for the Library with the following conditions: 1. The site plan reflect the approved pedestrian mall plan, and the Lihra_ry site nlan tip in with tho noioc+,.n m�11 2. The proposed drainage plan tie in with the existing drainage plan for the area 3. u1Ing 1g ing a roug ac or ommisston approvT— a AVON MUNICIPAL LIBRARY PLANT LIST TREES 3 Colorado Spruce 8 Austrian Pine 3 Mountain Alder 10 Dolgo Crabapple 5 Narrowleaf Cottonwood 10 Aspen Picea pungens, 2 @ 8'; 1 @ 10' Pinus nigra, i @ 12; 4 @ 10'; 2 @ 8% 1 @ 6' Alnus tenuifolia, multi -stemmed B&B 4-6 ht. Malus'Dolgo', 2-1/2" cal. Populus angustifolia, 3" cal. Populus tremuloides, 4 @ 2" cal; 6 @ 2-1/2" cal. 50% multistemmed SHRUBS (all 5 gallon size, except where noted) 5 Native River Birch Betula fontinalis, 4' multi -stemmed B&B 16 Colorado Dogwood Cornus sericea coloradense 5 Peking Cotoneaster Cotoneaster acutifolia 8 Cranberry Cotoneaster Cotoneaster apiculatus 5 Tammy Juniper Juniperus sabina tamariscifolia 3 Dwarf Mugo Pine Pinus mugho mughus 14 Potentilla 'K. Dykes' Potentilla fruticosa 'Katherine Dykes' 4 Potentilla 'Sutter's Gold' P. fruticosa 'Suttees Gold' 8 Nanking Cherry Prunus tomentosa 8 Alpine Currant Ribes alpinum 5 Harrison's Yellow Rose Rosa x Harisonii 11 Blue Stem Willow Salix irrorata GROUND COVERS AND PERENNIALS See landscape plan for areas to be planted with perennial flowers and native ground covers. TREES TO BE REMOVED 5 Cottonwoods at north end, 8" - 12" caliper 6 Cottonwoods at south end, 8" - 12" caliper 1 Locust, 3-1/2" caliper (could possibly be transplanted) I Small fruit tree, 1-1/2" caliper, plum? SHRUBS TO BE REMOVED 9 Lilac 1 Honeysuckle 2 Birch* 4 Potentilla 4 Large Cotoneaster* 3 Dogwood* 5 Elder 3 Unidentified * Town may wish to transplant. I o'�`� w D] as N�1 4 IL il33�L 4 J C o i J C O /t PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT April 5, 1994 Lot 58, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Sindlinger Single Family Final Design Review PROJECT TYPE: Single Family ZONING: PUD, Two Units COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES INTRODUCTION: An application for Final Design review of a single family residence has been submitted by Bruce and Toni Sindlinger. The single family residence will be located on lot 58, Block 1, which is approximately .5 l of an acre and slopes to the north at approximately 17%. The residence will contain two levels, ona being a walkout basement and will have the following exterior materials: The landscape plan will consist of one, 6-8' Colorado spruce, three, 2 1/2" caliper aspens, five, 5 gallon buffalo juniper, two, 5 gallon tam juniper, and one, 5 gallon redtwig dogwood. 'there will be irrigation for the sodded areas. The existing sagebrush and wildflowers which will be disrupted by grading will attempt to be saved and transplanted. Exterior building lighting has been indicated on the elevations and appears to be in keeping with surrounding exterior lighting plans on other buildings. STAFF COMMENTS: The drainage for this site is still of a concern to Staff Drainage flow appears to be going right into the garage. One option is to raise the top of slab in the garage to 8199' instead of the proposed 8198.5'. Materials Colors Roof Presidential Asphalt tan Siding 6" tongue and groove SW crossroad Fascia wood SW coastal hue Soffits wood crossroad Window clad tan Window Trim wood coastal hue Door clad tan Door Trim wood coastal hue Hand/ Deck Rail wood crossroad Flues clay no color indicated Flashings aluminum 11 Chimney wood crossroad The landscape plan will consist of one, 6-8' Colorado spruce, three, 2 1/2" caliper aspens, five, 5 gallon buffalo juniper, two, 5 gallon tam juniper, and one, 5 gallon redtwig dogwood. 'there will be irrigation for the sodded areas. The existing sagebrush and wildflowers which will be disrupted by grading will attempt to be saved and transplanted. Exterior building lighting has been indicated on the elevations and appears to be in keeping with surrounding exterior lighting plans on other buildings. STAFF COMMENTS: The drainage for this site is still of a concern to Staff Drainage flow appears to be going right into the garage. One option is to raise the top of slab in the garage to 8199' instead of the proposed 8198.5'. A" PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT April 5, 1994 Lot 58, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Sindlinger Single Family Final Design Review DESIGN REVIEW CONSIDERATIONS The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of this project Conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable regulations of the Town. Comment This proposal is in conformance with Town codes. The suitability of the improvement, including type and quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located. Comment: The type and quality of proposed building and landscape materials are consistent with Town guidelines The compatibility of the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties. Comment: .All impacts will be contained on site. The compatibility of the proposed improvements with site topography. Comment: The site design is compatible with the topography, taking advantage of the views to the north. The visual appearance of any proposed improvement as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. Comment The visual appearance of the proposed improvement will be consistent with other improvements in the area The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. Comment The proposal meets the objective of this guideline The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. Comment The proposal is in conformance with the goals, policies and programs for the Town of Avon. :Q PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT April 5, 1994 Lot 58, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Sindlinger Single Family Final Design Review STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission approve this application with the following conditions: 1. Revegetation of disturbed areas include native bushes. 2. Meters be placed on the building. 3. Flues, flashing and vents have a finished surface to match the color scheme of the structure. 4. Retaining walls over 4' high be designed by an Engineer. 5. Slopes may not exceed 2:1. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully Submitted Mary Holden Town Planner E2 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT April 5, 1994 Lot 58, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Sindlinger Single Family Final Design Review PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions (✓� Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) o Date 64" (491c Sue Railton, Secretarymet .tio-'L�. , The Commission oranntted final design approval with the following conditions: 1. Revegetation of disturbed areas include native bushes 3. Flues, flashings and vents have a finished surface to match the color 'chomp of the StrUctUL2 4. Retaining walls over 4' high be engineered by an engineer. 5. Slops may not exceed 2:1. 6. Lan :ecape p an be brought back for further Commission review. \ 1 1 1/ 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1- —r 1I I 1 1 1 3 1 .1 1 1 1 1 111 I Z n - a � 1 I I 1 � 1 1 , 1 1 J1, 1 / / 1 ' 1 ' II \ I 1 1 I i 1 1 1 1 I 1 ' 11 1 \ \ \ (A / _ y 1\ , 1 l 1 1 I 1 I 0 17'V 54 t s x �144VS I I I \ II 1 ' I 1 1 \ 1 � \ \ \ \ I I I / _ y Tl � I I I I I I I I I I I I I I \ II 1 ' I 1 1 \ 1 � \ \ \ \ I , r II I I I I I I 11 `� I I I l I I Q ,_ I .� . „s ;� ,_ .' ;� -� .' i I i A PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT April 5, 1994 Lot 42, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision Eubanks/Hubers Duplex Final Design Review PROJECT TYPE: Duplex ZONING FUD, Two Units COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES INTRODUCTION: John Railton has submitted an application for final design review of a duplex on Lot 42, Block 2. The lot, 1.5 acres in size, slopes from north to south at approximately 41%. The duplex will be located on the north portion of the lot. The duplex will contain three levels and stand approximately 35 feet in height The duplex will consist of the following materials The landscape plan includes Colorado Spruce/Ponderosa Pine Materials Colors Roof Celotex Presidential shake weathered wood Siding cedar board and batten egret white(Shr. Wlm) Other rough sawn cedar rocky coast (SW) Serviceberry moss rock stone at base 2 gal Fascia rough sawn cedar rocky coast (SW) Soffits rough sawn cedar ply " Windows Metal clad wood dark tan Window Trim rough sawn cedar Door metal clad wood Green(Ben. Moore) (selected front and garage doors) Hand/ Deck Rail redwood Flues/Flashings metal to match roof The landscape plan includes Colorado Spruce/Ponderosa Pine 3 6-8' high Russian Olive 21 2" cal Aspen 18 2" cal Alpine Current 6 2 gal Serviceberry 6 2 gal Potentilla 6 2 gal Yellow Flowering Current 6 2 gal Rabbit Bush 6 1 gal The landscape plan calls for drip irrigation on the south side to the trees and underground automatic to the sod and garden areas on the north side Revegetation is proposed to be native grass and wildflower mix dM� PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT April 5, 1994 Lot 42, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision Eubanks/Hubers Duplex Final Design Review STAFF COMMENTS: The west unit garage and various retaining walls are iv the front yard setback. The applicant must reouest a variance from the front yard setback to have the garage and retaining walls remain in the setback or remove the improvements from the setback Staff still has concerns regarding the drainage plan. On the drainage plan submitted for a building permit, spot elevations must be indicated on the plans for the frontyard swail and all related catch basins. Further, the catch basins must have sizes indicated on the plans The plans reflect all the utility connections except for sewer. The sewer connection must be indicated on the plans submitted for a building permit. Further, all site disturbance, including the utility cuts, need to he revegetated with native bushes, in addition to native grasses and wildflowers. Due to the steep nature of the site, a condition of approval will be that an erosion control and construction fence be placed on site prior to any construction which will designate disturbance and non -disturbance areas. The driveway material has not been indicated on the plans, a request at conceptual review. Should the driveway be concrete, an asphalt apron must be provided where it ties into the street. DESIGN REVIEW CONSIDERATIONS: The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of this project Conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable regulations of the Town. Comment This proposal is in conformance with Town codes The suitability of the improvement, including type and quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located. Comment The type and quality of proposed building and landscape materials are consistent with Town guidelines and the Wildridge Subdivision. The site is a platted subdivision lot with very steep slopes The compatibility of the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties. Comment All impacts will be contained on site PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT April 5, 1994 Lot 42, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision Eubanks/Hubers Duplex Final Design Review The compatibility of the proposed improvements with site topography. Comment. The proposed improvements are compatible and sensitive with the site and slopes. The visual appearance of any proposed improvement as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. Comment This site is prominent from many locations in the area The design of this steep site will help minimize negative visual impacts. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. Comment: The proposal meets the objective of this guideline. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. Comment: The proposal is in conformance with the goals, policies and programs for the Town of Avon. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Planning and Zoning approve this application with the following conditions I A drainage plan submitted for a building permit indicating the elevations for the swails, and all catch basins 2 The catch basins be sized on the drainage plan 3 Retaining walls over 4' high be designed by an Engineer 4. Should the driveway be concrete, an asphalt apron be provided where it ties into the street 5 An erosion control and construction fence be placed on site prior to any disturbance 6. Revegetation must include native bushes. 7. All improvements be removed from the front yard setback or a variance applied for and approval given 8. Size of plant material must conform to minimum Town standards ft A STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Planning and 'Zoning approve this application with the following conditions: 1. A drainage plan submitted for a building permit indicating the elevations for the swails, and all catch basins. 2. The catch basins be sized on the drainage y. € • _,. 3. Should the driveway be concrete, an asphalt apron be provided where it ties into the street. 4. An erosion control and construction fence be placed on site prior to any disturbance. 5. Revegetation must include native bushes. 6. All improvements be removed from the front yard setback or a variance applied for and approval given. 7. Size of plant material must conform to minimum Town standards. 8. All foundations must extend to bedrock, per Soils Report. 9. All retaining walls must be structural and designed by an Engineer prior to the issuance of a building permit. 10. A special foundation design is required for the area on the north side of the structure, west of the east unit porch entry, to accomodate the difference between finish grade on the outside and floor elevation on the inside (approximately 3 1/2' difference). A PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT April 5, 1994 Lot 42, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision Eubanks/Hubers Duplex Final Design Review RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully Submitted Mary Holden Town Planner PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions (' ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) c ////�� Date ?'—� /�T� Sue Railton, Secretary /'4c � A:z_ �✓ SEE ATTACHED SHEET 60 Lot 42, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision, Eubanks/Hubers Duplex Final Design Review The Commission granted final design review approval with the following conditions: 1. A drainage plan submitted for a building permit indicating the elevations for the swails, and all catch basins. 2. The catch basins be sized on the drainage plan. 3. Should the driveway be concrete, an apshalt apron be provided where it ties into the street. 4. An erosion control and construction fence any disturbance. 5. Revegetation must include native bu-hes. 6. All improvements be removed from the front applied for and approval given, be placed on site prior to yard setback or a variance 7. Size of plant material must conform to minimum Town standards. 8. All foundations must extend to bedrock, per Soils Report. 9. All retaining walls must be structural and designed by an engineer prior to the issuance of a building permit. 10 A special foundation design is required for the area on the north side of the structure, west of the east unit porch entry to accommodate the difference between finish grade on the outside and floor elevation on the inside (approximately 3-1/2' difference). A I It. 0 s: i 41 I PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Apt it 5, 1994 Lot 63, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Guida Duplex Conditions of Approval PROJECT TYPE: Guida Duplex ZONING: PUD, Two Units COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES INTRODUCTION: At the March 1, 1994 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, the Commksion approved the Guida duplex with conditions. Two of those conditions were that ine colors and lighting be brought back for Commission review and adproval. STAFF COMMENTS: John Railton has submitted the colors and lighting for Commission review. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: As conditions of approval, Staff has no recommendations RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Introduce Ap,ilication 2. Applicant Pr,sentation 3 Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully Submitted Mary Holden Town Planner PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Aprii 5, 1994 Lot 63, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Guida Duplex Conditions of Approval PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted (✓f Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date_�Q/ti. eSue Railton, Secretaryz, /-a.-Gf The Commission granted approval of the proposed colors and light fixtures as propcsod. — - (�4. ISLANDER 0 FE Oft 0 K-9244 AZ Contemporary outdoor lighting with a budget n mind. Lamps Dimensions Hgt. from center of wall opening K-9231 Architectural Bronze 1-R-30. 75-W. Max. (M) Hg1. 7". Width 4'F'. Extension 7" 3" • K-9234 Black 1-R-30. 75-W Max. (M) Hgt 7". Width 4h". Extension 7" 3" K-6234 White 1-R-30. 75 W Max. (M) figt. 7". Width 4'E". Extension 7" 3" K-6236 Architectural Bronze 1 R-40. 150-W. Max. (M) Hgt. 9". Width 6". Extension 814' 3'." • K-9236 Black 1 -R-40.150-W. Max. (M) Hgt. 9". Width 6". Extension 6%" 3''" K-9236 White 1-R-40. 150 W. Max. (M) Vit. 9", Width 6". Extension 8;f' 3 " K-9244 Architectural Bronze 2 -R -30.75-W. Max. (M) Hgt. 12". Width 3 ,", Extension 7" 6" 4 K-9244 Black 2-R-30. 75-W. Max. (M) Hgt. 12", Width 4:F', Extension 7" 6" 4 K-9244 Whig 2-R-30 75-W. Max. (M) Hgt. 12". Width 4'.:". Extension 7" 6" .4 K-9246 Arcmirictui at Bronze 2 -R -40.150-W. Max. (M) Hgt.'Width Width 6", Extens:or 8 (" T%" •4 K-9246 Black 2 -R -40.150-W. Max. (M) Hgt 15". Width 6". Extension 8, " 7' " 4 K-9246 White 2-R-40. 150-W Max. (M) Hgt 15". Width 6". Extension 8 7 K-9534 Black Heat resistant glass Dia. 4!<.". HgL%.' For use with K-9244 all finishes K-9536 Black '-leat resistant glass Dia. 6". Hgt.Y" For use with K 9246 all finishes K-9544 Black Plastic grooved baffle Dia. 4V". Hgt. 2%" For use with K-9234 and K-9244 all finishes _ K-9546 Black Plastic grooved baffle Dia 6". Hgf. 2," For use with K-9236, K-9246 all finishes 4 K-9834 White 1-R-30. 75-W. Max (M) Dia 4 ". Hgt 8X" 4 U listed for damp location. • mustrated with Black qrooved battle Must be ordered separately Lens accessories... ��rf ` Brightness control accessories... ;onvod open too ur"' . to ��" _ Groovpd Mack plastic baffles achieve low 1 outdoor application SPc r'acn. onghtness. (Baffles available Heat resistant glass lens K-9534 K-9536 for all fixtures luted on this page except with black fr axe._ K-9834) K-9544 K-9546 K-9834 K-9234 BK K-9234 AZ VH KICHLER LIGHTING 181 • • 411111110 lM PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT April 5, 1994 Lot 4, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Golden Eagle Service Center Final Design Review, Color Modification INTRODUCTION The Planning and Zoning Commission granted final Design Review approval, with conditions, to the Golden Eagle Service Center on July 6, 1991 The applicant has subsequently come before the Commission for modifications and conditions of approval review. This modification is for a change in building cclor. STAFF COMMENT The original color theme for the building was: body: milkweed trim: tight gray -beige accent: brown The proposed colo: theme is as follows: body: otter trim: metal tone accent: cape town green The prop( ;ed colors fit with the area and are in keeping with color schemes approved throughout Town. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission approve this modification as submitted. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action PLANNW{= AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT April 5, 1994 Lot 4, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Golden Eagle Service Center Final Design Review, Color Modification Respectfully submitted, �/a� L�_C�r tit_ Mary Ho den Town Planner PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted (,) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date �?ft Sue Railton, Secretary PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT April 5, 1994 Lot 14, Filing 1, Eaglebend Design & Construction Services Duplex Final Design Review -Modifications PROJECT TYPE: Duplex ZONING: PUD -Duplex COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES INTRODUCTION: Dave Prater, on behalf of Design and Construction Services has submitted an application for modifications to Lot 14, Filing 1, Eaglebend. The modifications consist of a color change and the extension of the roof over hang on the southeast portion of the building to cover stairs leading to the rear of the property. The roof overhang materials will match the existing building matt•rials. STAFF COMMENTS: The modified roof overhang will extend out into the side yard setback. Building setbacks must be kept open from the ground up. The applicant must apply for and receive approval of a variance or adjust the SE lot line. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission approve this application with the following condition: I. A variance be applied for and approval granted for the side yard setback or an Ammended Final Plat (lot line adjustment) be submitted and approv-d. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Mary Holden Town Planner raz PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT April 5, 1994 Lot 14, Filing 1, ELglebend Design & Construction Services Duplex Final Design Review -Modifications PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended cr,nditions (� Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date 6- / Sue Railton, Secretary The Commission granted approval for tha pxtpncinn of thg, r90r eYer the stairs and for a minor color change with the following c,)nditions• 1. The lot line be redrawn so that the extension -foes not encroach into the setbask 2. Six by six material be Used for the posts for the extension over the walkway. 34 W" i PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT April 5, 1994 Lot 43, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision Bober Residence Conceptual Design Review PROJECT TYPE: Single Family ZONING: PUD, One Unit COMPLIES WITH ZONING' YES INTRODUCTION: Andrew Bober has submitted an application for conceptual design review of a single family residence on Lot 43, Block 3, which is .72 acres in size. The single family unit will contain three levels and stand approximately 28' high. The single family _..it will consist of the following materials A landscape plan was not submitted for conceptual review. STAFF COMMENTS: There is a proposed pone cochere with the overhangs extending into the front yard setback. Setbacks must be kept open from the ground up Staff has reviewed the proposal and following are the comments Site Plan. I Utility connections need to be shown on the site plan for FDR, 2 The type of driveway needs to be indicated, 3 A grading and drainage plan, on a certified tojography, showing. trt,e limits of site disturbance, utility connections, all easements; driveway tic in to street, and Flat Point Road intersection in relation to site and driveway cut Materials Color Roof asphalt shingles no color indicated Siding stucco " Other flag stone column/r.s. cedar bonding " Fascia r.s. cedar " Soffits r.s. cedar faced plywood " Window Anderson " Window Trim oak " Door birch face " Flues/Flashings metal " Chimney flag stone " A landscape plan was not submitted for conceptual review. STAFF COMMENTS: There is a proposed pone cochere with the overhangs extending into the front yard setback. Setbacks must be kept open from the ground up Staff has reviewed the proposal and following are the comments Site Plan. I Utility connections need to be shown on the site plan for FDR, 2 The type of driveway needs to be indicated, 3 A grading and drainage plan, on a certified tojography, showing. trt,e limits of site disturbance, utility connections, all easements; driveway tic in to street, and Flat Point Road intersection in relation to site and driveway cut PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT April 5, 1994 Lot 43, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision Bober Residence Conceptual Design Review 4. Building overhangs are not iilowed in the setbacks; 5. A construction, erosion control and site disturbance fence may be needed for this site, depending on the slopes and grades; and 6. A landscape plan must be submitted for FDR. Design: I. Exterior building lighting must be indicated on the elevations, 2. Colors and materials need to be indicated on the elevations and samples provided, and 3. The type of fireplace needs to be indicated. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: As a conceptual review, the Staff has no formal recommendation_ Respectfully Submitted Mary Holden Town Planner 0 r PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT April 5, 1994 Lot 43, :Hock 3, Wildridge Subdivision Bober Residence Conceptual Design Review PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action (,/) Date_ —Sue Railton, Secretary_ , Since this was a conceptual design review, no formal action. was taken at tis time. The Commission had concerns that this project might not be suitable for Wildridge, as it does not seem much like a mountain home. Iftt and th the setback e materials proposed. �e and thg ° E2 rO I J va ON a I J V r -,, J V Zn 701 F v � M1 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT April 5, 1994 Lot 9, Filing 1, Eaglebend Subdivision Dwyer Residence Conceptual Design Review PROJECT TYPE: Single Family, with future iockoff unit ZONING: PUD, Duplex COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES INTRODUCTION: Heuring Construction & Design has submitted an application for conceptual design review of a single family residence with a future lock off apartment on Lot 9, Filing 1. The lot, .37 acres in size, slopes to the south at approximately 14.5%. The single family will contain three levels and stand approximately 35' high. The single family will consist of the following materials The conceptual landscape plan consist of the following: Pinion Pine 6 3" cal. Aspen 10 3" cal Sandcherry 6-15 5 gal. Colors brow tone gray bh-z gray white stain Sod is proposed and all disturbed areas will be hdyro seeded with a grass and wildflower mix STAFF COMMENTS: Revegetation must include native bushes found in the area along with native grasses and wildflowers Materials Roof 3 tab, asphalt shingle Siding rough cedar lap Other N/A Fascia 2x Dimensional Soffits rough cedar ply Window eagle casements Window Trim oak Door 6 panel Hand/deck Rails red wood Flues/Flashings galv. Chimney wood sided The conceptual landscape plan consist of the following: Pinion Pine 6 3" cal. Aspen 10 3" cal Sandcherry 6-15 5 gal. Colors brow tone gray bh-z gray white stain Sod is proposed and all disturbed areas will be hdyro seeded with a grass and wildflower mix STAFF COMMENTS: Revegetation must include native bushes found in the area along with native grasses and wildflowers 10,44 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT April 5, 1994 Lot 9, Filing 1, Eaglebend Subdivision Dwyer Residence Conceptual Design Review Staff has reviewed the proposal and following are the comments: Site Plan: 1. Detail and location needs to be provided on all proposed retaining walls and designed by an engineer if over 4' in height; 2. Utility connections need to be shown on the site plan for FDR, 3. The type of driveway needs to be indicated; 4. An accurate grading and drainage plan, on a certified topography, showing true limits of site disturbance and the 30' setback from the mean annual high water mark, needs to be submitted for FDR; 5. A construction, erosion control and site disturbance fence needs to be placed on site delineating the construction and non -construction zones; 6. The site plan needs to reflect the driveway tie into the street; 7. Parking for the future lock off must be shown, and 8. Access to the lock off needs to be shown, Desren: 1. Tie finished grades to building elevations; 2. Provide finished building elevations (floor and roof) and tie building to finished grade, 3. Building height may not exceed 35'; 4. Building lighting must be indicated on the elevations; 5. Colors and materials need to be indicated on the elevations; and 6. The type of fireplace needs to be indicated. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: As a conceptual review, the Staff has no formal recommendation. Respectfully Submitted Mary- Holden Town Planner �0 O PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT April 5, 1994 Lot 9, Filing 1, Eaglebend Subdivision Dwyer Residence Conceptual Design Review PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action (�f Date S / Sue Railton, Secretary As a conceptual design review, no formal action was taken. Considerable discussion followed on the Staff concerns regarding the landscaping, proposed retaining walls, utility connections, type of driveway and the way it ties s Vdi r i y piarr-ot-a certified topo, showing true lines of site disturbance and also indicating thethirty font sethark from the mean annual high water mark, the installation of a construction/erosion control fence, parking for the future lock -off and access to the lock -off, the finished grade being tied to the building elevations an co ors an materia s. I •'t 50'> f°"° EBEND ` DR l VE .00 3-00 c it R X73.71 _ • L ` 7 \Si 7 80 ole a 0,1 AR f• 'r Il ! • SSIAw t \ R \T Ise it �• Ja' N[Ifal!-..all GYfIIMJ N11:1]'IYl' \IfH1P' ]IRI — '� � rS enrtr uo gvxYl r� p SMV11071,1 113.01' OW iR Ali A ,fe6 t..vu EAC`E RSR �. v Lay ''• E' N L. � I•• 4m on a a PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT April 5, 1994 Lot 47, Block 3, Wildridge SubdivL ion Smith Single Family Residence Conceptual Design Review PROJECT TYPE: Single Family ZONING: PUD, One Unit COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES INTRODUCTION: Mike Perkin has submitted an application for Conceptual Design Review of a single family residence on Lot 47, Block 3, Wildridge. The lot, 1.71 acres in size, slopes to the south at approximately 40%. The single family dwelling will contain two levels and stand approximately 24-27' high. An underground, three car garage is being proposed In addition, the site plan notes that "12' wide driveway (gravel in year one, paved in year two after settlement)". The single family will consist of the following materials The landscape plan includes Pinon Pine 2 6' high 2 8' high Aspen 8 2" cal 8 1 1/2" cal Juniper Tree 3 C high 3 8' high Materials Colors Roof single -ply membrane, river rock ballasat natural river rock Siding N/A Other synthetic stucco Moonlit sand Fascia N/A Soffits I x6, t&g, fir Seagull gray Window Trim N/A Door metal clad wood Bronze (front entry door to be custom carved wood) Courtyard/Patio Walls stucco match bldg. Flues/Flashings sheet metal match bldg Chimney stucco match bldg Exterior Beams/Columns smooth fir Seagull gray Garage Doors 1 x6, t&g, fir Not indicated Entry Gate Custom wrought iron Black The landscape plan includes Pinon Pine 2 6' high 2 8' high Aspen 8 2" cal 8 1 1/2" cal Juniper Tree 3 C high 3 8' high 00► PLANNING AND LONING COMMISSION STAFF RErORT April 5, 1994 Lot 47, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision Smith Single Family Residence Conceptual Design Review Ground cover, annuals, and p;reniais-are proposed around the patio. Revegetation will take place with native bushes and grasses. An automatic drip system is being proposed to all trees and formal bedding areas. STAFF COMMENTS: The three car garage will be located underground within the 25' front yard setback, therefore a setback variance will not be required. The rest of the building will abut the 25' front yard setback, in which case, overhangs may not extend into the setback. The driveway is proposed to be gravel for the first year and paved after the first year. Staff sees no reason not to pave the driveway prior to a Certificate of Occupancy. Staff has reviewed the proposal and following are the comments: Site Plan: 1. Finished slopes may not exceed 2:1; 2. Detail needs to be provided on all proposed retaining walls and designed by an engineer if over 4' in height; 3. Utility connections need to be shown on the site plan for FDR, 4. The type of driveway needs to be indicated; 5. An accurate grading plan and drainage plan, on a certified topography, showing true limits of site disturbance needs to be submitted for FDR; 6. A construction, erosion control and site disturbance fence needs to be placed on site delineating the construction and non -construction zones, 7. Snow storage needs to be addressed; 8. Landscaping may not be placed in areas of snow storage, and 9. Landscaping must meet minimum Town standards of 2" caliper deciduous trees. Desien: 1. Tie finished grades to building elevations, 2. Place spot elevations on the elevations, 3. Colors and materials need to be indicated on the elevations, and 4. The type of fireplace needs to be indicated. 1 A PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT April 5, 1994 Lot 47, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision an Smith Single Family Residence Conceptual Design Review STAFF RECOMMENDATION: As a conceptual review, the Staff has no formal recommendation. Respectfully Submitted X41 Ct«� Mary Holden Town Planner PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withd , ) Conceptual, No Action (✓f Date 471Sue Railton, Secretary As a conceptual review, no action was taken at this time. The general consensus of the ommission was tiat they liked the design of the house and felt that the applicant could either leave the garage underground or id . L�11.v I 2 "14 Nyl.O 0 `1`1i�r n1:.� -^•.�i �t �•�" Y.� 1 n�� . L- ' f l l I I I I I 1. G ` /'� // /' 1 1 1 1 1 •III � I � � 1 / • a• I' I I I I 1C1 b71..I I; 111 II i ?4` s4 a, ,t 1.. r 1 • 1' I � I I I C>'� 4l',r w -. .�.. is t.. _I \I" ir-•j�//j I h�lr �( �It' l/ l I l 1. � 11 1 1 r4��'�Y II � Ir :1'l 1 / I/� • �1 I � r / / / pr 1 Irl 1, 1. I r 1 I• '. i �I I I I I I I I �i ..•. �� Ilii I I I 1 1 11.1 1 '.• I I ,11.1 I I I � I 111 1.J I 1 I I 1 1 �4 1 i J' Il�h:11111J'i 11 1 11. #� ''� , �1 ` � 'L; ,•ri i 1' i. �"Iii I: �.;i�•��. ".1. ' 1 .IIII -I I. I • I I I �. b, - �•� 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I 1 1� �e 4m { L rill �a + `` C4 r a�cl F , ,ki ,Y x •� )ks��., EiAs' � ' � :. 'fir , ® 0. • i J _ � iJ I •S �� 4 J �j J OD P -j, f: I�, 04. ,,+tir ��••i• it tit' jl' -ti'i a i,5 � � + ,�`ftiA" C: � , � 1! +� d ar. S'dl� 6 a t'• �i , % j , v C � s� rl -'gyne z 7 V� -a ig s M a s QI np 0 C� V • ,9 0 11 C 7 V� -a ig s M a s QI np 0 C� V ,9 • . .•AR �I I . t191 Y Y OW99 � ti rare f NO FOI� n n `-P V � -d + 3 < v s QNB � �a- 'f- E p T yN El [40 [40 [4m iri 10 J �uu 6� J -'V r v v VPv �{ — a d �' G am Ji U _ Q n � r s a A PLANNING ANu ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT April 5, 1994 Lot 24, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Avon Plaza Conceptual Design Review PROJECT TYPE: Retail/Office ZONING- SC, Shopping Center COMPLIES WITH ZONING`' YES INTRODUCTION: Jerry Dokken, on behalf of Tim Garton and Kim Peterson, has submitted an application for conceptual design review for 18,000 square feet of retail and office space The project will consist of two buildings on Lot 24. Both buildings will be one level, with the exception of Building A, which will contain a second level on the west end of the building. This second level will have 1,200 square feet of office. The highest building point is approximately 34' The site plan indicates 76 parking spaces, which is the requirement for office/retail. The proposed buildings will consist of the following materials. Roof metal no color indicated Siding synthetic stucco Fascia synthetic stucco A landscape plan has not be provided for conceptual review STAFF COMMENTS: Lot 24, Block 2 is located in the I Shopping Center Zone District, 2 Comprehensive Plan Subarea 15, which designates this lot as having primary Streetscape development and public pedestrian space, and 3 Specifically addressed in the section on Urban Design, B Land Uses -General, in the Design Guidelines (attached are the sections from the Comprehensive Plan and the Design Guidelines) The conceptual plans do not reflect primary streetscape development, or any type of pedestrian space as outlined in the Comprehensive Plan The proposal must address these items for Final Design review The Design Guidelines specificalIN address this lot by stating that development should "provide interesting views into the site from 1-70, the site will become terminus of Pedestrian Mall, and good location for nighttime activity/entertainment " A Pedestrian Mall is not being developed as shown in the Design Guidelines However, there is an 0 a PLANNING ANtfi ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT April 5, 1994 Lot 24, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Avon Plaza Conceptual Design Review opportunity to make a pedestrian connection to the east of the proposed building. We would like the applicant to consider the connection. Staff has reviewed the proposal and following are the comments: Site Plan: 1. An accurate grading and drainage plan is required, which must show detail on the detention areas, the existing buildings on adjacent properties, the adjacent lot lines for at least 20 feet, and the edge of pavement of E Beaver Creek Blvd., 2. Parking many be no closer than 10' to the front property line; 3. Landscape islands need to be located at the end of the parking rows; 4. The sidewalks in front of the buildings are 5' wide. With doors propped open, there would be 2' clearance between the door and the edge of curb. Staff would recommend the applicant look at indenting the entry ways into the building, 5. Trash enclosure needs to be located elsewhere, and detail provided on the enclosure, 6. Overhangs are not allowed to extend into the setbacks, 7. The building separation, at the closest point, is 7', with the roof overhangs only 1' apart; 8. A detailed landscape plan must be submitted for Final Design review, with a minimum of 20% of the site in a landscaped area; 9. Exterior building lighting, materials and colors needs to be shown on the elevations and detail provided for FDR; 10. Snow storage needs to be addressed; 11. Utility connections need to be shown, 12. Parkit-,z needs to have landscape screening from E. Beaver Creek Blvd., 13. Streetscape improvements must be shown; 14. The entrance into the proposed project must align with the entrance into Christie Lodge across the street, and 15. Emergency vehicle access in the parking area needs to be addressed. Building Design: 1. Building should reflect criteria set forth in the Design Guidelines. PLANNING A)h%iZONING COMMISSION STAFF FORT April 5, 1994 Lot 24, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Avon Plaza Conceptual Design Review �- STAFF RECOMMENDATION: As a conceptual review, the Staff has no formal recommendation. Respectfully Submitted Mary Holden Town Planner PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ./' Date d�Sue Railton, Secretary ✓X� 1- Sinre this was a conceptual review, no actin was taken The Commission had concerns regarding the parking, the landscaping, and the proposed location of the loading dock and the dumpster, the need for a pathway through from East Beaver ree v o eaver ree ace. a ommission e r he applicant has overloaded the site. • restaurant • office ?] • accessory apartments • public parking/public park E. Comments: • development must relate to Pedestrian Malls —'� 11. Parcel 24 A. Approximate Area: 57,500 sq. ft. (1.32 ac.) B. Accessible from: • Beaver Creek Blvd. 3 • proposed Pedestrian Mall Corridor C. Adjacent Land Uses: • North: Beaver Creek Blvd., I-70 '3 • South: vacant lot, bank • East: Fifty-one Beaver Creek Place (retail) • West: Beaver Creek Blvd., Christie Lodge D. Recommended Parcel 24 Land Uses: • retail/commercial/accessory apartments or offices • restaurant/athletic club E. Comments: • provide interesting views into site from 1-70 • site will become terminus of Pedestrian Mall u] • good location for nighttime activity/entertainment a A -;a R 17 RV XM mall paving into private entries to provide continuity. Provide well lighted, pleasant pedestrian access from parking structures to the pedestrian mall and buildings. Develop Benchmark Road and East and Nest Beaver Creek Boulevard as primacy streetscapes. Locate primary service areas and loading docks to buildings on Benchmark Road and Beaver Creek Boulevard. Conceal utility boxes, trash dumpsters, and service areas. Subarea 15: This district is characterized by existing one to three story Core Commercial commercial development that is oriented primarily to shoppers District who arrive by automobile. The district serves as a regional service center for the drily and long-term needs of permanent and seasonal residents of the surrounding residential neighborhoods. Presently, the vehicular �p✓vl� . �(G� circulation patterns are ill-defined and provisions for pedestrian access between businesses is minimal. Recomn_e,,aations: Develop sign, architectural, and landscape guidelines specifically for the commercial core. The theme should be of the same character as that which is developed for the Town Center. Require new development and encourage existing development to incorporate sloped roofs, sheltered entrances, pedestrian connections to existing development, and equal architectural treatment to all exposed faces. Colors should be muted, with bright colors limited to ground level a -id used sparingly in association with signage or architectural accents. Develop East Beaver Creek Boulevard as a primary streetscape and Beaver Creek Place as a secondary streetscape. 5.26 I rX Minimize access points on East Beaver Creek Boulevard and Avon Road to simplify circulation. Develop these access points as shopping area entrances with specia'. landscaping and pedestrian walks. Investigate the possibility of designating Beaver Creek Place as a one- way street to enhance circulation in the area. Within parking lots, define main circulation routes with planting islands. E.,courage existing development to add landscaped parking islands to interrupt large paved areas and provide partial screening. Screen loading docks and service areas -- generally separate truck and passenger vehicle traffic. Coordinate the location of service and loading areas between businesses to minimize the land area devoted to those activities. • Limit building heights to three to four stories Subarea 16: Swift Gulch is presently undeveloped, located between generally Swift Gulch south -facing slopes. As with most southern exposures in the mountains, the area has no trees to naturally soften development. Access to development will be off Swift Gulch Road, which should eventually become a collector that connects to mixed use parcels further east. Recommendations: Develop the entire area as a master planned development to ensure that (1) access points from Swift Gulch Road are minimized; (2) landscape buffering along the road is installed with the first phases of development: (3) an adequate, internal vehicular and pedestrian circulation system is provided for; (4) and steep slopes are protected from development. Building heights should be limited tc three stories. Building materials and colors should be neutral to blend in with the hillsides. j Offensive uses should be adequately screened with berms and f landscaping. 5.28