PZC Minutes 102181RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
MINUTES OF DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING
OCTOBER 21, 1981, 7:30 P. M.
The regular meeting of the Design Review Board for rhe Town of Avon was held
on October 21, 1981, at 7:30 P.M. in the Town Council Chambers of the
Town of Avon Municipal Building, 400 Benchmark Road, Avon, Colorado. The
meetino was called to order by Chairman Bill Pierce.
Board Members present were Bob Zeeb, Cheryl Dingwell, Tommy Landauer, Mike
Blair, Bill Pierce, Jerry Davis, Ken Hardwick. Terrill Knight and Dick Evans
were also present.
Item kl, Alpine Develo ment Conceots, Six -P1
Ren�ina. 1 7 oc c . IT
ri oe Subd` vi
Steve Wydeveld made the presentation.
At the meeting of October 14, 1931, the applicant was requested to bring in
a new colored rendering which would show the exterior changes f -r the stucco
and wood siding. This vas requested so that it would have a different
appearance from the other two buildings. The applicant was also asked to
submit a drainage plan to the Town Engineer for approval and to put a light
at the end of the driveway.
Steve submitted an addendum which stated the following:
1. An 18 inch culvert will be set in driveway, adjacent to and parallel
with Wildridge Road and it will be in accordance with the Code.
2. The exterior pole lamp, located on the west side of the driveway, will
be relocated on the north-west side of the driveway adjacent to Wildridge
Road.
Exterior Design change: he proposed changing where there is presently cedar
on the building now it will become stucco, and where there is stucco it will
be cedar. It will create a different image for the exterior appearance
while still keeping the same basic interior image.
Terrill stated chat the changes appear to be satisfactory, but Norm would have
to go over the plan in detail.
Steve said that the colored renc'�ring which he was presenting was identical to
the four-plex on Lot 3, Block 1, Wildridge. The Board stated that they had
requested a NEW rendering. Bill stated that it is required by the Ordinance
to submit a cored rendering of the actual project presented.
Terrill stated that there seams to be a design discretion for each individual
lot. This is a series of lots that are designed and are operated individually
rather than as a unit and the question is should it be designed all together
as a unit or if separated, should they appear as independen6 projects and have
independenct design. Rather than having the identical building in several
different areas should they be a new design.
John Eden / Architect - stated that between Lot 3 and Lot 6 there are two
driveways. One goes to lot 4 and one to lot 5. They are flag lots. There
is a maximum of 70 feet separation between the three buildings which could
look like a single unit. The buildings were designed to look like a total
complex. If the Board feels that a separation is necessary then change lot
6 not lot 7.
Bill stated that he would like to see different buildings for different lots
and doesn't think buildings should be repeated. Cheryl stated she did not
want to see tnree buildings identical in appearance.
•
,um, �i Avu(i r....,.. ,.ui uui luln5, 4uu ueilCni11arK KOd::, .on, i.0 1.
meeting was called to order by Chairman Bill Pierce.
Board Members present were Bob Zeeb, Cheryl Dingwell, Tommy Landauer, Mike
Blair, Bill Pierce, Jerry Davis, Ken Hardwick. Terrill. Knight and Dick Evans
were also present.
Item #1, Al oine Develo ment dCione, SSx-P
,Lt ocen erinq
BT,v
i ]® Steve Wydeveld made the presentation.
At the meeting of October 14, 1981, the applicant was requested to bring in
a new colored rendering which would show the exterior changes for the stucco
and wood siding. This was requested so that it would have a different:
appearance from the other two buildings. The applicant was also asked to
submit a drainage plan to the Town Engineer for approval and to put a light
at the end of the driveway.
e
Steve submitted an addendum which stated the follo:-ring:
1. An 18 irich culvert will be set in driveway, adjacent to and parallel
with Wildridge Road and it will be in accordance with the Code.
2. The exterior pole lamp, located on the west side of the driveway, will
be relocated on the north-west side of the driveway adjacent to Wildridge
Road.
Exterior Design change: he proposed changing where there is presently cedar
on the building now it will become stucco, and where there is stucco it will
be cedar. It will create a different image for the exterior appearance
while still keeping the same basic interior image.
Terrill stated that the changes appear to be satisfactory, but Norm would have
to go over the plan in detail.
Steve said that the colored rendering which he was presenting was identical to
the four-plex on Lot 3, Block 1, Wildridge. The Board stated that they had
requested a R'FW rendering. Bill stated that it is required by the Ordinance
to submit a colored rendering of the actual project presented.
Terrill stated that there seems to be a desiqn discretion for each individual
lot. This is a series of lots that are designed and are operated individually
rather than as a unit and the question is should it be designed all together
as a unit or if separated, should tney appear as independent projects and have
independenct design. Rather than having the identical buildino in several
different areaq should they be a new design.
John Eden I Architect - stated that betweLn Lot 3 and Lot 6 there are two
driveways. One goes to lot 4 and one to lot 5. They are flag lots. There
is a maximum of 70 feet separation between the three buildings which could
look like a single unit. The buildings were designed to look like a total
complex. If the Board feels that a separation is necessary then change lot
6 not lot 7.
Bill stated that he would like to see different buildings for different lots
and doesn't think buildings should be repeated. Cheryl stated she did not
want to see three buildings identical in appearance.
-1-
to
•
Bill stated that if the Colored Rendering which they presented was what they
wanted to use (it was a rendering for lot 6), then they could change the lot
• number to lot 7 and the Board would then vote on it.
Ken made a motion to not accept the rendering on the request and recommendation
• from the Board from last week's meeting, that it is not the proper rendering.
It is to be the same identical type as the others. Bill ask for Ken to
clarify the motion. Ken stated that he did not want to accept the rendering.
The project was approied at the last meeting with the condition that a new
rendering be submitted showing the changes of exterior. The motion was
seconded by Cheryl. There being no further discussion, the motion was passed
unanimously by the Board not to grant final approval for the project until a
rendering is submitted which meets the requirements requested by the Roard
Members from the meeting of 10/14/81.
Item H2, Vail Building Arts Center, Special Review Use, Lots 26, 27 & 28,
Block 1, Benchmark Subdivision, File No. 81-9-1.
Les Shapiro was present to make the presentation. Requesting Special
Review Use for the following: =ik, Health Club, Restaurant, Retail
and Office Space.
He stated that they are proposing a name change to " THE DESIGN CENTER AT
AVON" A Project of Vail Building Arts Associates.
The building is devoted to the building art trades. On the first level
there will be retail, wholesale, plumbing fixture supplies, electrical
supplies and fixtures, carpet, tile, window manufacturer --anything relating
to the building trade.
The second and third levels would be for Architects, Decorators, etc... office
type space.
On the first and fourth levels is where the special requests are concerned.
A bank, which will be about 1,000 square feet will be on first level. The
health Glib facility and restaurant will be on the fourth level.
The property is presently zoned Industrial Commercial. Parking: for the
warehouse there will be approximately 55.7 spaces; retail/wholesale will be
approximately 51.75 spaces: Office will be approximately 86.9 spaces.
Required to have 194 spaces. The plan shows 2GO spaces on it.
If they decide to have a 50 seat restaurant they must be able to meet the
parking requirements. As it stands now there is only enough for a 24 seat
restaurant.
Bill stated that he felt it is an upgrade to the zone district.
All the board members felt that as long as the parking requirements are met,
the Special Uses could be allowed.
Ken made a motion to approve the Special Review Use for Retail, Office, Bank
Health Club and Restaurant. This would be recommended to the Town Council.
The motion was seconded by Jerry, passed unanimously.
Item #3. William Nolan/Batas Townhomes. Remodel. Lot 6. Block 1. Benchmark
(let the record show that Bob Zeeb stepped down from the board and did not
participate in the voting.)
Bill Nolan made the presentation. Requested approval to enclose the balcony
on the .orthside of the building for Unit A only. All materials which will be
used for enclosing the balcony will be the same as the rest of the building.
Board granted approv?1 for the remcdel of the balcony. (let the record show
that Bob Zeeb did not vote).
rendering be submitted showing the changes of exterior. The motion was
seconded by Cheryl. There being no further dis.ussion, the motion was passed
unanimously by the Board not to grant final approval for the project until a
rendering is submitted which meets the requirements requested by the Board
• Members from the meeting of 10/14/81.
Item !`2, Vail Building Arts Center, Special Review Use, Lots 26, 27 & 28,
Block 1, Benchmark Subdivision, File No. 81-9-1.
Les Shapiro was present to make the presentation. Requesting Special
review Use for the following: Bank, Health Club, Restaurant, Retail
and Office Space.
He stated that they are proposing a name change to " THE DESIGN CENTER AT
AVON" A Pr;ject of Vail Building Arts Associates.
The building is devoted to the building art trades. On the first level
there will be retail, wholesale, plumbing fixture supplies, electrical
supplies and fixtures, carpet, tile, window manufacturer --anything relating
to the building trade.
The second and third levels would be for Architects, Decorators, etc., office
type space.
On the first and fourth levels is where the special requests are concerned.
A bank, which will be about 1,000 square feet will be on first level. The
health club facility and restaurant will be on the fourth level.
The property is presently zoned Industrial Commercial. Parking: for the
warehouse there will be approximately 55.7 spaces; retail/wholesale will be
approximately 51.75 spaces; Office will be approximately 86.9 spaces.
Required to have 194 spaces. The plan shows 200 spaces on it.
If they decide to have a 50 seat restaurant they must be able to meet the
parking requirements. As it stands now there is only enough for a 24 seat
restaurant.
Bill stated that he felt it is an upgrade to the zone district.
All the board members felt that as long as the parking requirements are met,
the Special Uses could be allowed.
Ken made a motion to approve the Special Review Use for Retail, Office, Bank
Health Club and Restaurant. This would be recommended to the Town Council.
The motion was seconded by Jerry, passed unanimously.
Item N3, William Nolan/galas Townhomes, Remodel, Lot 6, Block 1, Benchmark
Subdivision. File No. 81-10-5.
(let the record show that Bob Zeeb stepped down from the board and did not
participate in the voting.)
gill Nolan made the presentation. Requested approval to enclose the balcony
on the northside of the building for Unit A only. All materials which will be
used for enclnsing the balcony will be the same as the rest of the building.
Board grantees approval for the remodel of the balcony. (let the record show
that Bob Zeeb did not vote).
90
i•
There being no further business to discuss, the minutes were then read.
® Jerry made a motion to approve the minutes, it was seconded by Tommy, passed
unanimously.
• Cheryl requested that at the next meeting the colored rendering for the First
Bank of Avon be brought out so she can see what the Board Members approved.
No one seemed to remember approving of the GREEN color for �;ie sign and trim.
Bill recommended that the Building Department take care of this matter.
Bill also commented that the decks on Avon Center don't seem to be the same
ones that the Board approved. Mike suggested that the staff check into this
matter.
Cheryl made a motion to adjourn the meeting, it was seconded by Mike, passed
unanimously.
Respectfully submitted by:
Melody Cummings
Recording Secretary
Design Review Board