Loading...
PZC Minutes 110482RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS MINUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING NOVEMBER 4, 1982, 1:30 P. M. The regular meeting of the Design Review Board of Avon was held on November 4, 1981, at 7:30 p.m. in the Town Council Chambers of the Town of Avon Municipal Complex, 400 Benchmark Road, Avon, Colorado. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Bill Pierce. Memberr present were: Jerry Davis, Mike Blair, Bill Pierce and Bob Zeeb. Staff Members present were: Dick Kvach/Planning Director, Art Abplanalp/Town Attorney and Melody Cummings/Recording Secretary. Item No. 1, Reading and Approval of DRB Minutes of 10/21/82. Mike Blair moved to approve the minutes of October 21, 1982 as presented. Motion was seconded by Bob Zeeb and passed unanimously. Item No. 2, Lots 5, 52A, 52B & Tract B, Block 1, Benchmark Subdivision, SPA, File No. 82-11-1. (Public Hearing) (Mike Blair abstained from any discussion and action due to a possible conflict of interest). Dick Kvach stated the Town of Avon agreed to request rezoning of the lots to SPA as part of an agreement on a court settlement. The SPA zoning would be for the following uses: Lot B as Open Space; Lot 5 for Condo/Hotel of 50 units; Lots 52A and 52B for Private Park, Recreation and Commercial. Lot B is presently zoned as Open Space and future land use plans are for it to remain as Open Space so the zoning should be left as is. Feels the SPA would be appropriate for Lots 52A and 52B. Recommendations are that Tract B (Open Space) be deleted from the request. Lot 5 be RHDC. 52A & 52B be SPA. If any or all of the lots are approved for SPA then the following conditions would apply: (1) a site development plan shall be submitted and approved by the DRB and Town Council prior to any grading being done or any construction permits being issued. (2) the Developer of any parcel requesting access off Buck Creek Road or Nottingham Drive shall be responsible for the construction and costs of installation of left turn lanes and/or deceleration lanes as required by the Town Engineer. Such facilities shall be constructed to standard town specifications. (3) no structure shall exceed a height of 60 feet. (4) minimum building setbacks shall be as follows: a. front 25 feet b. side 7.5 feet c. rear 10 feet (5) Off-street parking requirements shall be determined by the DRB at the time final plans are submitted. In the proposed ordinance it shows 'tract X to be zoned OLD - it should be SPG. Also all of Tract C is zoned OLD. The ordinance should be revised to include these George Rosenberg, representing the owners of the property, stated this was originally approved by the Town Council in 1920. A law suit came about this year which requires an ordinance be established for the zoning. The existing plat only shows 52A, 52, a small portion of B & C. 52A will probably be used for an entryway to Buck Creek and Wildwood. There would not be any residential on 52A but may be some type of commercial. Asking that this be zoned SPA but limit it to a use of Private Park, Recreation and relatr,d Commercial. Art Abplanalp stated there may be a problem with Lot 52A. A recent court decision indicated that if a Lown restricts a Piece of ground in a*manner which prevents its use that restriction is likely to be set aside by a courtlot 52A is so small that after TLic. :L&uiur meeting of the Design Review Duard of Avon was held on November 4, 1982, at 7:30 p.m. in the Town Council Chambers of the Town of Avon Municipal Complex, 400 Benchmark Road, Avon, Colorado. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Bill Pierce. Members present were: Jerry Davis, Mike Blair, Bill Pierce and Bob Zeeb. Staff Members present were: Dick Kvach/Planning Director, Art Abplanalp/Town Attorney and Melody Cummings/Recording Secretary. Item No. 1, Reading and Approval of DRB Minutes of 10/21/82. Mike Blair moved to approve the minutes of October 21, 1982 as presented. Motion was seconded by Bob Zeeb and passed unanimously. (Mike Blair abstained from any discussion and action due to a possible conflict of interest). Dick Kvach stated the Town of Avon agreed to request rezoning of the lots to SPA as part of an agreement on a court settlement. The SPA zoning would be for the following uses: Lot B as Open Space; Lot 5 for Condo/Hotel of 50 units; Lots 52A and 52B for Private Park, Recreation and Commercial. Lot B is presently zoned as Open Space and future land use plans are for it to remain as Open Space so the zoning should be left as is. Feels the SPA would be appropriate for Lots 52A and 52B. Recommendations are that Tract B (Open Space) be deleted from the request. Lot 5 be RHDC. 52A & 52B be SPA. If any or all of the lots are approved for SPA then the following conditions would apply: (1) a site development plan shall be submitted and approved by the DRB and Town Council prior to any grading being done or any construction permits being issued. (2) the Developer of any parcel requesting access off Buck Creek Road or Nottingham Drive shall be resuonsible for the construction and costs of installation of left turn lanes and/or deceleration lanes as required by the Town Engineer. Such facilities shall be constructed to standard town specifications. (3) no structure shall exceed a height of 60 feet. (4) minimum building setbacks shall be as follows: a. front 25 feet b. side 7.5 feet c. rear 10 feet (5) Off-street parking requirements shall be determined by the DRB at the time final plans are submitted. In the proposed ordinance it shows Tract X to be zoned OLD - it should be SPG. Also all of Tract C is zoned OLD. The ordinance should be revised to include these George Rosenberg, representing the owners of the property, stated this was originally approved by the Town Council in 19P0. A law suit came about this year which requires an ordina"ce be established for the zoning. The existing plat only shows 52A, 52, a small portion of B & C. 52A will probably be used for an entryway to Buck Creek and Wildvood. There could not be any residential on 52A but may be some type of commercial. Asking that this be zoned SPA but limit it to a use of Private Park, Recreation and related Commercial. Art Abplanalp stated there may be a problem with Lot 52A. A recent court decision in& --ated that if a town restricts a piece of ground in a*manner which prevents its use that restriction is likely to be set aside by a courtLot 52A is so small that after all setbacks are taken into account it may not be useable as commercial and the town may have to give relief to the land owner. Suggested that if this is to be approved as a plan unit development that this lot be dedicated to the town as Public Open Space. -1- Jerry Davis stated he was concerned with Lot 51 losing the view corridor from Lot 5 possibly having a 60 foot building. After lengthy discussion, Jerry Davis moved to continue this public hearing on the zoning change of Lots 5, 52A 6 Tract B to the November 18, 1982 meeting. Motion was seconded by Bob Zeeb and passed. Item No. 3, Avon Center Building Sign Lot A, Block 2, B Dick Kvach stated this request is for a sign to be located on the northeast side of the building at the 8th story level. It will be 55.4 square feet. The Design Review Board originally approved a ground level sign as part of the Comprehensive Sign Program of Avon Center. This request is to eliminate the ground sign and put it on the building to be seen better. The letters will be Bronze Channelume letters. The proposed sign materials are the same as the other signs. The sign is under the maximum allowed 64 square feet. Recommending the sign be approved. Nick Dalba stated that no one can identify Avon Center. He is also concerned with the light color of the sign on the light building. The sign will be lit 24 hours. Suggested wrapping the letters with one inch bronze border to help the letters stand out. Jerry Davis moved to approve the application for Avon Center for the building sign on Phase I to be approximately 64 square feet witn one inch border around each letter to be consistant with the previous signing plan and the sign can be lit 24 hours. Motion was seconded by Bob Zeeb. With no further discussion the motion was passed unanimously. Other Business: Ordinance Amending Lock -Offs: Dick Kvach stated that the proposal on lock -offs basically defines what a lock - off is, where it is to be permitted and what the parking requirements would be. After lengthy discussion it was decided to send the proposed amendment to the Town Council for their imput. Sign Ordinance Amendment: Dick Kvach briefly outlined the proposed changes to the Sign Code Ordinance as follows: Section 1 adds a clause that there shall not be any other advertising or signs constructed or maintained unless approved by DRB; and that all Buildings having multiple businesses will submit an overall comprehensive sign program. This was originally optional. Real Estate signs will be a�Lowed on vacant lots as long as they are placed beyond the required setback lines. The Board requested the sign amendments be passed on to the Council. Jerry Davis moved to adjourn the meeting. Motion was seconded by Bob Zeeb and was passed unanimously. Meeting was adjourned at 11:30 p.m. Respectfullysubmitte4 l_ G 71,- v Melody C ings Recording Secretary Design Review Bcard