Loading...
PZC Minutes 050682RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS MINUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING MAY 6, 1982, 7:30 P. M. The regular meeting of the Design Review Board of Avon was held on May 6, 1982, at 7:30 p.m., in the Town Council Chambers of the Town of Avon Municipal Complex, 400 Benchmark Road, Avon, Colorado. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Bill Pierce. Let the record show that members present were: Bob Zeeb, Cheryl Dingwell, Tommy Landauer, Bill Pierce, Mike Blair & Jerry Davis. (Jim Meehan was absent). Staff Members present were: Terrill Knight, Norm Wood, Dick Evans & Pat Abplanalp. No. 1.. Gemini Duplex, Final Approval (tabled from 4/15/82 meet Dave Irwin/General Contractor & designer, made the presentation. At the last meeting the Board had questions with the setback. The Board liked the general design. Terrill stated the major issue at the last meetiug was a misunderstanding on the setback. It has since been corrected. Let the record show that the roof will be cedar shake not metal as on the application. Materials and colors: Cedar color lighter than Stain No. 709. Trim will be Olympic Stain Oxford Brown. California quarry rock (imitation stone). Cedar siding 1x12 lapped by 2 inches gives bevel look. Corners to be done with 2 x 4. Mike motion that Whereas, the Design Review Board of the Town of Avon has reviewed the application of David L. Irwin for final approval of design of the "Gemini Duplex" and Whereas, The Design Review Board has determined that said application should be granted, on the basis of the materials presented on the 6th day of May 1982, Now, Therefore, be it resolved, that the Design Review Board of the Town of Avon approve and grant the application for final design approval for Lot 33, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subd?vision. Motion was seconded by Tommy, (Bob Zeeb abstained from voting due to not being familiar with presentation.) Approval was granted for the project. Item No. 2 Avon Center, Exterior Changes for Phase II, Lot Nick Dalba made the presentation to discuss changes for the second phase. The units facing mountain side have smaller windows and doors due to the placement of the columns. Asking to change the surface on the outside approximately to 20 percent more glass. Also would like to build a parapet wall approximately 3 feet hight on the roof. Jay Hosburgh of the Fire Department suggested this wall be built. Also would like to have a front entrance -way which will be exceeding the setback. This building will also have skylights in the upper units. The flues have been moved from the outside walls to the inside. There will be glass where flues used to be. The Board didn't approve the parapet wall. There will be two levels of underground parking. Bill asked that a new rendering be brought back showing changes. Terrill stated that the two issues should be separated (design & setback variance). Art read from the zoning ordinance that front lot line is the lot line on the street. Applicant requested that the discussion of exterior changes for Phase 2 be tabled until May 20, 1982 meeting due to not having the drawings necessary. The setback variance will need to go through the variance procedure. Item No. 3 tevens - ex Sign Lot 18 Block 2 Benchmark Subdivision, File No. 82-5-2. Gary Stevens made the presentation. Requesting approval to put up a development sign. The sign will not exceed 16 square feet in size and will not be over 8 feet in height. Jerry motioned to accept the sign as is. Motion was seconded by Cheryl. Approval was granted for the sign with Mike Blair abstaining. .ferry asked if the staff could take rnre of the signs if they conform to the sign .111.. "_ L L%a: t1._ zal ti « w_ .lc: b, t� all.:W complex, 40u UeneftmarK Road, avun, coloraau. 'Ihe meeting was callea to order by Chairmen Bill Pierce. Let the record show that members present were: Bob Zeeb, Cheryl Dingwell, Tommy Landauer, Bill Pierce, Mike Blair & Jerry Davis. (Jim Meehan was absent). Staff Members present were: Terrill Knight, Norm Wood, Dick Evans & Art Abplanalp. No. 1. Gemini. Duplex, Final Dave Irwin/General Contractor & designer, made the presentation. At the last meeting the Board had questions with the setback. The Board liked the general design. Terrill stated the major issue at the last meeting was a misunderstanding on the setback. It has since been corrected. Let the record show that the roof will be cedar shake not metal as on the application. Materials and colors: Cedar color lighter than Stain No. 709. Trim will be Olympic Stain Oxford Brown. California quarry rock (imitation stone). Cedar siding 1x12 lapped by 2 inches gives bevel look. Corners to be done with 2 x 4. Mike motion that Whereas, the Design Review Board of the Town of Avon has reviewed the application of. David L. Irwin for final approval of d, sign of the "Gemini Duplex" and Whereas, The Design Review Board has determined that said application should be granted, on the basis of the materials presented on the 6th day of May 1982, Now, Therefore, be it resolved, that the Design Review Board of the Town of Avon approve and grant the application for final design approval for Lot 33, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivisinn. Motion was seconded by Tommy, (Bob Zeeb abstained from voting due to not leing familiar with presentation.) Approval was granted for the project. II. Lot B Nick Dalba made the presentation to discuss changes for the second phase. The units facing mountain side have smaller windows and doors due to the placement of the columns. Asking to change the surface on the outside approximately to 20 percent more glass. Also would like to build a parapet wall approximately 3 feet hight on the roof. Jay llosburgh of the Fire Department suggested this wall be built. Also would like to have a front entrance -way which will be exceeding the setback. This building will also have skylights in the upper units. The flues have been moved from the outside walls to the inside. There will be glass where flues used to be. The Board didn't approve the parapet wall. There will be two levels of underground parking. Bill asked that a new rendering be brought back showing changes. Terrill stated that the two issues should be separated (design & setback variance). Art read from the zoning ordinance that front lot line is the lot line on the street. Applicant requested that the discussion of exte:{or changes for Phase 2 be tabled until May 20, 1982 meeting due to not having the drawings necessary. The setback variance will need to go through the variance procedure. Item No. 3 teveS—ns lex, Sign Lot 18 Block 2 Benchmark Subdivision, File No. 82-5-2. Gary Stevens made the presentation. Requesting approval to put up a development sign. The sign will not exceed 16 square feet in size and will not be over 8 feet in height. Jerry motioned to accept the sign as is. Motion was seconded by Cheryl Approval was granted for the sign with Mike Blair abstaining. Jerry asked if the staff could take care of the signs if they conform to the sign code ordinance. Terrill stated that the regulations could be amended to allow this. It should be discussed by the Zoning Committee. -1- Item No. 4, Peregrine Properties Moving of Office Trailer, Lot 63, Block Z, Benchmark Subdivision, Filr No. 82-5-3. ® Gregory Gage made tn.: pre--nration. Requesting approval to move the double wide trailer from Lot 61 to Lot 63. Would like to get a one (1) year approval. Presently being used as a sales office. He does not own Lot 61 only leasing. Jerry stated that he couldn't agree with a 1 year permit if there's a chance they may not skirt it. The trailer is being leased and they don't know what they are going to do (continue renting, buy or get rid of it.) Greg asked if he could have 75 days (until July 15, 1982). If he decides to keep the trailer and put ,f the skirting on it then he must reapply to the Board. The Board wants to see the parking layout, landscaping, culverts, before approval is granted. Cheryl motioned to deny the application as presented based on the documentation the Board has not received, that the site plan be submitted showing access to the property and parking, the trailer will beallowed to stay where it is now and not be used for 75 days (July 15, 1982) until such review is made. Motion was seconded by Tommy. Passed unanimously. The trailer can be left there for 75 days or until it is changed to a sales office which will require coming back to the Board with site plan. Item No. 5, Block 2, Be "lain Sign for Doug Mayes made the presentation. Proposing to use the balance of the allotted square footage of sign area allowed for Christie Lodge to put up a sign on the west end of the building. It will be mounted on the wall. Measured the letters excluding the logo and it totaled 32 square feet. Terrill stated that the proposed sign is almost twice what is allowed. The logo must be included in the total square footage. The first main sign in front of the building is 64 square feet in size. Doug proposed to turn the first main sign so that only one side will show, so that he may be allowed to have the c--ond sign. Cheryl motioned to approve �gn as submitted as long as it complies with 32 square feet and that the individual letters do not exceed 15 inches in height and the 32 square feet includes the logo and the lettering. Motion was seconded by Jerry, passed unanimously. Final Bob Armon made the presentation. Requesting final approval for Dunham Plaza Oft.ice Building. Terrill stated that there is a technical problem in that this particular zone, offices, are only allowed as a Special Review Use. Art suggested that the Board decide whether the applicant could be granted the Special Review Use based on the public Hearing held a year ago or whether the applicant should re -apply and go through the hearing. If the Board fee's that the opportunity was provided for the public at that time and the minutes state no one appeared, then there's nothingto prevent the Board from dealing with that application. If the Board feels that this is a new issue that should be reviewed on the basis of a new notice that is an option. Cheryl motioned that WHEREAS, the Design Review Board of the Town of Avon has reviewed the application of J.W.Skinner for approval a Special Review Use permitting the use of Lots 30-31, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, and WHEREAS, the Design Review Board subsequent to the public hearing held on the 18th day of February 1981, determined that the said application should be granted for the reasons set forth herein, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Design Review Board grant the said application. Motion was seconded by Mike, passed unanimously. Norm Wood's comments regarding the review of the project: The topographic map doesn't appearta meet the site conditions particularly along the roadway. Appears there is an area that is shown as future parking and appears that this area has to be counted in the overall parking plan but doesn't show up on the Other 5?rti.nns. An'r�'?^� v^r�a^rte ;ail' he rernired for 5 days (until July :-, - ")• If he decides Co keep Chc CrallLr anu pu the skirting on it then he must reapply to the Board. The Board wants to see the parking layout, landscaping, culverts, before approval is granted. Cheryl motioned to deny the application as presented based on the documentation the Board has not received, that the site plan be submitted showing access to the property and parking, the trailer will beallowed to stay where it is now and not be used for 75 days (July 15, 1982) until such review is made. Motion was seconded by Tommy. Passed unanimously. The trailer can be left there for 75 days or until it is changed to a sales office which will require coming back to the Board with site plan. for Doug Mayes made the presentation. Proposing to use the balance of the allotted square footage of sign area allowed for Christie Lodge to put up a sign on the west end of the building. It will be mounted on the wall. Measured the letters excluding the logo and it totaled 32 square feet. Terrill stated that the proposed s-.gn is almost twice what is allowed. The logo must be included in the total square footage. The first main sign in front of the building is 64 square feet in .3ize. Doug proposed to turn the first main sign so that only one side will show, so that he may be allowed to have the second sign. Cheryl motioned to approve the sign as submitted as long as it complies with 32 square feet and that the individual letters do not exceed 15 inches in height and the 32 square feet includes the logo and the lettering. Motion was seconded by Jerry, passed unanimously. No. 6 Lots 30-3 Bob Armon made the presentation. Requesting final approval for Dunham Plaza Office Building. Terrill stated that there is a technical problem in that this particular zone, offices, are only allowed as a Special Review Use. Art suggested that the Board decide whether the applicant could be granted the Special Review Use based on the public Hearing held a year ago or whether the applicant should re -apply and go through the hearing. If the Board feels that the opportunity was provided for the public at that time and the minutes state no one appeared, then there's nothingto prevent the Board from dealing with that application. If the Board feels that this is a new issue that should be reviewed on the basis of a new notice that is an option. Cheryl motioned that WHEREAS, the Design Review Board of the Town of Avon has reviewed the application of J.W.Skinner for approval a Special Review Use permitting the use of Lots 30-31, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, and WHEREAS, the Design Review Board subsequent to the public hearing held on the 18th day of February 1981, determined that the said application should be granted for the reasons set forth herein, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Design Review 3oard grant the said application. Motion was seconded by Mike, passed unanimously. Norm Wood's comments regarding the review of the project: The topographic map doesn't appearto meet the site conditions particularly along the roadway. Appears there is an area that is shown as future parking and appears that this area has to be counted in the overall parking plan but doesn't show up on the other sections. A parking variance will be required for approximately 48 percent small car spaces in order to meet the parking requirements. They should have an approved drainage plan to assure the site is protected from off-site flow and also possible mud and debris flow. Drainange plan does not show how drainage is carried across loading area. Two-way traffic ramps appear to be only 16-18 feet wide and grades are not shown. Ramp b trash area does not appear to match between drawings. Five loading spaces are indicated but only two are shown on -2- (Norm's comments continued) drawing. Size of proposed landscape materials and irrigation plans are not shown. Proposed development will require vacation of lot line along with vacation of drainage and utility easement. Should have letters from all utility companies agreeing to vacation and approved drainage plan assuring that problem will not be created by vacation of drainage easement. Terrill stated that the compact car spaces, which under current regulations, are not allowed except by variance. Bob Armon stated they have added two levels of office structure and one level of parking. One level of offices is on the east and one is on the west. The one level of parking is on the east side. Access and entrance to the building is the same. A healthclub has been added to the upper floor. It is approximately 25' x 50' in size. Also there is a proposed running track area on the roof. The building is a single loaded office corridor with stair towers in back and one office corridor along the back which accesses all of the office spaces. All of the spaces are approximately 44 feet in depth and all have direct sight to Beaver Creak. Averaging around 55 feet in height for the building, Materials will be stucco. There will be 193 parking spaces total. Each tenant will have a covered parking space. Compact car spaces planned is 33 percent. Requesting a variance for that amount. New trash location which is screened. It is moved back about twenty feet. (New plans were submitted at the meeting which answered most of. Norm's comments). Art commented that due to the new plans being submitted at the meeting rather than nine days, that the staff didn't get to do the review properly. Bill stated that the Board should not approve anything on promises that things will be done. Mike and Jerry felt that if the technical items were not too complicated, then the Staff could handle them and approve them without the applicant coming back to the Board. Applicant requested final approval for the project. Tommy was concerned with the possibility of the healthclub being turned into commercial space and therefore increasing parking. The Board felt the design was good and that the staff comments needed to be dealt with. Bill stated that he wanted to see the landscaping plan, materials, etc. The Board requested that the applicant re -submit nine days prior to the May 20, 1982 meeting. (The applicant realized he was only requesting conceptual approval). Cheryl motioned that Conceptual Approval be granted based on the design of the building and that the items addressed In the letter from the Town Engineer be completed and submitted to the staff for approval and that the application be resubmitted to the Design Review Board for final approval. Motion was seconded by Bob. The Board granted conceptual approval for the project. Item No. 7, Hole in the Wall Deck Addition, Tract Q, Benchmark Subdivision, File No. 82-5-6. (let the record show that Tommy Landauer stepped down from the Board due to a conflict of interest with this item.) Dave Peele made the presentation. Proposing a 40 seat deck for the restaurant. The deck area +s 1100 square feet. Terrill stated that this meets all the zoning standards. Art concerned with the ownership of the property. Dave presented an addendum to the 1976 lease stating that an outdoor patio may be allowed. The present parking for the Hole in the Wall is 25 spaces. They will be adding 10-11 spaces. The required total parking for Benchmark Shepping Center including the deck addition will be 93 spaces. There are approximately 130 spaces now. Bill suggested planting some shrubs along the east and west ends of the deck. Based on the plan submitted there will be a six foot high wall around the deck to prevent trash from going into the irrigation ditch which is adjacent to the deck. Bob commented that he would like to see something done so the handicapped may be able to dine at the restaurant. Cheryl asked if the parking lot could be re -striped. Tommy stated that Triond Corporation would be the one to contact regarding the striping of the parking lot, as they are the owners of the building. He also stated that they would consider some type of facility for the handicapped. Cheryl made a motion to approve the deck addition for the Hole in the Wall restaurant as submitted and asked from the attorney that he check into some form of action in regards to striping the entire parking lot. Motion was seconded by Mike. Motion was passed with Tommy abstaining). one level of parking is on the east side. Access and entrance to the building is the same. A healthclub has been added to the upper floor. It is approximately 25' x 50' in size. Also there is a proposed running track area on the roof. The building is a single loaded office corridor with stair towers in back and one office corridor along the back which accesses all of the office spaces. All of the spaces are approximately 44 feet in depth and all have direct sight to Beaver Creek. Averaging around 55 feet in height for the building. Materials will be stucco. There will be 193 parking spaces total. Each tenant will have a covered parking space. Compact car spaces planned is 33 percent. Requesting a variance for that amount. New trash location which is screened. It is moved back about twenty feet. (New plans were submitted at the meeting which answered most of Norm's comments). Art commented that due to the new plans being submitted at the meeting rather than nine days, that the staff didn't get to do the review properly. Bill stated that the Board should not approve anything on promises that things will be done. Mike and Jerry felt that if the technical items were not too complicated, then the Staff could handle them and approve them without the applicant coming back to the Board. Applicant requested final approval for the project. Tommy was concerned with the possibility of the healthclub being turned into commercial space and therefore increasing parking. The Board felt the design was good and that the staff comments needed to be dealt with. Bill stated that he wanted to see the landscaping plan, materials, etc. The Board requested that the applicant re -submit nine days prior to the May 20, 1982 meeting. (The applicant realized he was only requesting conceptual approval). Cheryl motioned that Conceptual Approval be granted based on the design of the building and that the items addressed in the letter from the Town Engineer be completed and submitted to the staff for approval and that the application be resubmitted to the Design Review Board for final approval. Motion was seconded by Bob. The Board granted conceptual approval for the project. Item No. 7 Hole in the Wall Deck Addition, Tract Q, Benchmark Subdivision (let the mcord show that Tommy Landauer stepped down from the Board due to a conflict of interest with this item.) Dave Peale made the presentation. Proposing a 40 seat deck for the restaurant. The deck area is 1100 square feet. Terrill stated that this meets all the zoning standards. Art concerned with the ownership of the property. Dave presented an addendum to the 1976 lease stating that an outdoor patio may be allowed. The present parking for the Hole in the Wall is 25 spaces. They will be adding 10-11 spaces. The required total parking for Benchmark Shopping Center including the deck addition will be 93 spaces. There are approximately 130 spaces now. Bill suggested planting some shrubs along the east and west ends of the deck. Based on the plan submitted there will be a six foot high wall around the deck to prevent trash from going into the irrigation ditch which is adjacent to the deck. Bob commented that he would like to see something done so the handicapped may be able to dine at the restaurant. Cheryl asked if the parking lot could be re -striped. Tommy stated that Triond Corporation would be the one to contact regarding the striping of the parking lot, as they are the owners of the building. He also stated that they would consider some type of facility for the handicapped. Cheryl made a motion to approve the deck addition for the Hole in the Wall restaurant as submitted and asked from the attorney that he check into some form of action in regards to striping the entire parking lot. Motion was seconded by Mike. Motion was passed with Tommy abstaining). (Tommy stepped back up to the Board) -3- Ranch (Cottonwood). Final Approval for Phase I Jim Morter made the presentation. Requesting final approval for Phase I only. Terrill read a partial transcript of the Town Council meeting on April 27, 1982 in reference to the Cottonwood Project (copy on file). Jerry stated that there was some kind of an indication that the Cottonwood developers would be in agreement with what the Council comes up with later in regards to the lock -off units. Jim Morter agreed that any ordinance that dealt with lockoffs would be conformed to. Art stated that this is an apnlization whereas it deals with the subdivision of land which was not previously subdivided. Everything that has come before the town has been a development on land previously subdivided as far as condos. In this case the land was annexed to the town and was not subdivided prior to that and there is a recognition now that the subdivision process is something that the Tou-t Council is going to need to deal with. The subdivision regulations are separate from design review. Terrill stated that the subdivision process would take care of soils and tests and review and also the irrigation ditch question. Any change that is required by the subdivision process must be brought back to the Design Review Board. Jerry stated that the DRB should know how many lock -offs and parking spaces there will be. Norm stated that the required parking for Phase I is 173 spaces and they have provided 178. For the total project 333 spaces are required and they have provided 338. All of the parking spaces are full size and are on-site. Feels this is one of the better parking plans. Jim Morter stated that the concept is the same with the exception of a driveway going down below Building 3. Terrill read a letter from Jim Morter to Norm Wood regarding the cleaning of the storm drain along the eastern property line. They propose to provide a manhole at or near the paved service area and to utilize either a "Roto -rooter" type of system, or a bucket -drag system to move the silt to the manhole. The silt would then ha pumped from the manhole. The final details will be resolved during our preparation of construction documents. (signed Jim Morter). Terrill also read a letter from Tim Garton stating that the developers of the Cottonwood Club do hereby agree that the regular and reasonable maintenance of the 30 inch CMP storm drain located on the east boundary of the Cottonwood Club property shall be the responsibility of the Cottonwood Club Condominium Association rind such responsibility will be stated in said Association's Condominium Declarations. The Town of Avon shall have the right to periodically inspect the storm drain. In the event the Town of Avon feels reasonable maintenance work isneeded they shall notify the Cottonwood Club Condo Assoc. If the Condo Assoc. does not perform requested reasonable maintenance work the Town of Avon shall have the right to perform said maintenance work and bill the same to the Cottonwood Club Condominium Association. (signed Tim Garton). (Both of these letters are on file). Jim stated they will not need a variance for small cars as all the spaces are full size. The roof material will. be concrete tile blue gray in color. Bob motioned that WHEREAS, the Design Review Board of the Town of Avon has reviewed the application of Avon Ranch Company for final design approval of Cottonwood, Phase I only (60 units) and the Design Review Board has determined that said application should be granted, on the basis of the materials presented. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Design Review Board of the Town of. Avon approve the final design approval for Cottonwood, Phase I, being a part of the Meyers Ranch annexation parcel. Motion was seconded by Cheryl, passed unanimously. There being no further business to discuss, Tommy motioned to approve the Minutes of April 15, 1982, seconded by Bob, passed unanimously. Mike suggested that the presentations should be made a little more professionally rather than. having the applicants sitting on the counters with backs to the audience. Cheryl motioned to adjourn the meeting, seconded by Tommy, passed unanimously. / I ; Submitted by(//��I j 0k < of land wLi h w t previa., ',divi,.1. Everything that has come before the town has been a development on land previously subdivided as far as condos. In this case the land was annexed to the town and was not subdivided prior to that and there is a recognition now that the subdivision process is something that the Town Council is going to need to deal with. The subdivision regulations are separate from design review. Terrill stated that the subdivision process would take care of soils and tests and review and also the irrigation ditch question. Any change that is required by the subdivision process must be brought back to the Design Review Board. Jerry stated that the DRB should know how many lock -offs and parking spaces there will be. Norm stated that the required parking for Phase I is 173 spaces and they have provided 178. For the total project 333 spaces are required and they have provided 338. All of the parking spaces are full size ALA are on-site. Feels this is one of the better parking plans. Jim Morter stated that the concept is the same with the exception of a driveway going down below Building 3. Terrill read a letter from Jim Morter to Norm Wood regarding the cleaning of the storm drain along the eastern property line. They propose to provide a manhole at or near the paved service area and to utilize either a "Roto -rooter" type of system, or a bucket -drag system to move the silt to the manhole. The silt would then be pumped from the manhole. The final details will be resolved during our preparation of construction documents. (signed Jim Morter). Terrill also read a letter from Tim Garton stating that the developers of the Cottonwood Club do hereby agree that the regular and reasonable maintenance of the 30 inch CMP storm drain located on the east boundary of the Cottonwood Club property shall be the responsibility of the Cottonwood Club Condominium Association and such responsibility will be stated in said Association's Condominium Declarations. The Town of Avon shall have the right to periodically inspect the storm drain. In the event the Town of Avon feels reasonable maintenance work isneeded they shall notify the Cottonwood Club Condo Assoc. If the Condo Assoc. does not perform requested reasonable maintenance work the Town of Avon shall have the right to perform said maintenance work and bill the same to the Cottonwood Club Condominium Association. (signed Tim Garton). (Both of these letters are on file). Jim stated they will not need a variance for small cars as all the spaces are full size. The roof material will be concrete tile blue gray in color. Bob motioned that WHEREAS, the Design Review Board of the Town of Avon has reviewed the application of Avon Ranch Company for final design approval of Cottonwood, Phase I only (60 units) and the Design Review Board has determined that said application should be granted, on the basis of the materials presented. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Design Review Board of the Town of Avon approve the final design approval for Cottonwood, Phase I, being a part of the Meyers Ranch annexation parcel. Motion was seconded by Cheryl, passed unanimously. There being no further business to discuss, Tommy motioned to approve the Minutes of April 15, 1982, seconded by Bob, passed unanimously. Mike suggested that the presentations should be made a little more professionally rather than having the applicants sitting on the counters with backs to the audience. Cheryl motioned to adjourn the meeting, seconded by Tommy, passed unanimously. -4- Submitted by Melody Cuinga �NVJ Recording Secretary