Loading...
PZC Packet 041185L.7 C7 fO' STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 4/11/85 Lot 9, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Sherwood Meadows Condominiums Design Review - Change Exterior Colors Applicants have applied for design review for a color change on the exterior of the Sherwood Meadows Complex at 0371 Nottingham Road, Lot 9, Ol ock 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek. The new colors will be a combination of grays. Colors and photographs will be presented at the meeting for review. Respectfully S mitte� an Fogland Building and Zoning Administrator Planning and Zoning Action: Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied 't, drawn Date L �/� �� Seccrettaarry IL grn K �aowl?I�i� D F 1111w ] STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 4/11/85 Lot 65, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Avon Executive Center Design Review Applicants have submitted a proposal for development on Lot 65, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek. Attached is a well prepared document providing information on this project. Basically as proposed, it is a combination commercial/residential project. The project as proposed is a 5 story building with surface and covered parking. This project is in the heart of the Development Plan for District I. This project raises some of the questions as to Avon's plans for roads, access, malls, etc., that have been being prepared for this area in conjunction with, and as a part of the Development Plan. Generally, we prefer to have informal discussions with applicants at the Staff level before proceeding with design review applications. We received these plans February 28, 1985 and had hoped the applicant would be able to visit with Staff to compare their project with the planning we have been doing in that area. However, the applicant has been unable to visit with us. It appears now that the applicant will be in the day of the meeting. Therefore, he will not have seen our precise plans in this area. With this in mind, the Staff would recommend that discussion be aimed towa^ds general comments regarding the site layout and building design. Our preliminary review indicates that it may be possible to shift the building a little to the north and avoid conflicts with any access or roads which we have been looking at for this area. However, we feel the applicant should be given time to address our proposed Development Plan as to how it may effect their proposed development plan. Considerations should be given to: 1. Development Plan, Goals, and policies for District I; 2. Effect of airport height requirements on this project; 3. Further study, i.e., drainage study and plan, as this area is in desperate need of a drainage plan; 4. Site grading and topography plans, utilities, ditches, etc.; 5. Traffic flow, impact on adjacent streets, effect of the possible closure of the Avon Road access point, etc. Jim Lamont is also reviewing and preparing a report regarding this project. Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 4/11/85 Lot 65, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Avon Executive Center s Design Review Page 2 of 2 Ib Ib Ply recommendation is that the applicant be asked to review the Development Plan, Goals, policies, the above considerations, and/or other considerations and report back within 30 to 60 days as to how their proposed project fits in. Respectfully bmit ed; �/ Dan Foglan Building and Zoning Administrator Planning and Zonina Action: Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( Viol' Denie ( thdrawn ( ) Date Secret'ary DF/mml STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 4/11/85 Lot 1, Wildwood Resort Holiday Inn - Preliminary Design Review Continued from 3/28/85 Regular Meeting Applicants have submitted several revised plans attempting to arrange the building and site with all of the factors involved. It appears at this time a majority of the major problems have teen worked out, however a number of miscellaneous items still have yet to be resolved and most are mentioned later in this Staff report. At the time this report was written, the Town Counc;l had not finalized the Special Review Use on the large parking lot reduction. This Staff report and current plans assume the Council will approve tiie parking reduction. Failure of the Town Council to approve the parking reduction will be cause for major revisions to this project. As you were informed at the previous meeting, the buildinq and site have been modified in the following ways: 1. Added: 16 parking spaces, north lot; 2. Buildi:g footprint was reduced in size; 3. An additional floor was added to the middle section of the building; 4. A walkway was added to the bus stop and toward Pizza Hut; 5. Increased landscaping and site in the front of the building, (south); At the March 14, 1985 Commission meeting, preliminary approval was given. Since that meeting, significant changes have been made such as the additional story on the middle portion, increased and rearranged parking on the north lot, etc., and those items mentioned earlier. If the Commission feels it is appropriate, preliminary approval of the revised plans would be in order. The Staff feels that final approval would not be appropriate until the followina ite,ns have been addressed, clarified and/or approved: 1. Revise color .evations and site plan; 2. Review light fixtures to be used in the parking lots; 3. Exterior - south sign; 4. Sign program for building and site, size, types, styles, locations, etc.: iW \ Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 4/11/85 Lot 1, Wildwood Resort Holiday Inn - Preliminary Design Review Continued from 3/28/85 Regular Meeting Page 2 of 3 5. Building encroaches into utility easement; a. Upper Eagle Valley Sanitation District approval for relocation; 6. Nottingham-Puder Ditch piping out of easement; a. Avon Metro District approval; 7. Avon Metro District approval for piping Buck Creek and Nottingham-Puder Ditch; a. Meeting April 17, 1985; 8. Building dimensions not shown on site plan; 9. Agreement regarding Swift Gulch Road access must be approved by developer; 10. Snow storage is inadequate - will require trucking; 11. Utility plan does not match revised site plans; 12. Drainage plan does not match site plan; 13. Landscape plan should show location, materials and heights of retaining walls; 14. Landscaping should be more sensitive to site distance at intersections; 15. Native grasses may not be appropriate as shown - What about irrigation system? Respectful y Sub i ed, Fogl nd Buildin and Zoning Administrator Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 4/11/85 Lot 1, Wildwood Resort Holiday Inn - Preliminary Design Review • Continued from 3/28/85 Regular Meeting Page 3 of 3 Planning and Zoning Action: Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions "0 Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denie ( ) thdrawn J Date 1� ►a 7 > �`�u� St?� PG�1�� 1Ssrv�33 aruc- �� K,t�cP,ure� UMtege� +a> w r,�t ► DF/mml 04 STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 4/11/85 Tract P, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Water Treatment Building Conceptual Review r As most of you know, the Upper Eagle Regional Water Authority wishes to construct a new water treatment facility on Tract P. The Town of Avon and others have an interest in Tract P. The town has plans to construct a facility of its own on or adjacent to the Water Treatment building. Due to these and other factors, the design process needs to be coordinated. With all of this in mind, RBD Engineering Consultants working with the Upper Eagle Water Authority, wish to begin the design review process and have applied for conceptual design review. The plans as submitted are conceptual in nature. Due to all other entities involved, the designs and layouts may change to some degree. Therefore, the Staff would recommend the discussion be limited to general perception and review of the site layout and building design. Any approvals may not be apriopriate until all parties involved have agreed on the site layout and building concerns. Respectfully bmitted, Dan Fogland Building and Zoning Administrato,- Planning and Zoning Action: Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions ) Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued (V/) Deni Y ithdrawn ( ) Fill. .IDSCIJ a'j 4 Date_�_�_�� a '�+*Y, Secretary lig Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 4/11/85 Lot 63, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Peregrine Vil -: Preliminary Plat Page 2 of 2 Parking is the last of the problem areas to be resolved prior to approval of the Preliminary Plat for Peregrine Village Condominiums. If the above parking program is acceptable to the Planning and Zoning Commission and the developers of Peregrine Village, it is suggested that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend Town Council approval of the Prelminary Plat for Peregrine Village Condominiums subject to the above conditions and correction of minor technical errors. Respectfully Submitted, Norm Wood Town Engineer Planning and Zoning Action: Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Gond i Approved ,�.,,with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) 1 Withdrawn >"'Q Date 01111c7 �, ecretary e MW/mml STAFj REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 4/11/85 Lot 63, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Peregrine Village Preliminary Plat In the course of reviewing the Preliminary Plat for Peregrine Village Condominiums, the Planning and Zoning Commission has approved plans establishing open space and the actual number of parking and loading spaces available on site. The original design review for this project was started in 1979 and final design review approval was granted May 21, 1980. Since the original.approval, various plans and correspondence have been submitted with commercial space ranging from 51,000 SF to 61,000 SF, and with on-site parking spaces ranging from 360 spaces to 377 spaces. The Preliminary Plat and related plans show 58,056 SF of commercial space and 349 on-site parking spaces. During a recent meeting, representatives of Peregrine Village indicated a willingness to construct a surface parking lot on the triangular portion of Tract G immediately adjacent to the west end of the Peregrine project. This parking lot would be a public lot owned by the Town and would primarily provide additional parking for activities in the park. It could also function as overflow parking for Peregrine Village as it is unlikely that peak parking demands for Peregrine Village and Nottingham Park will occur at the same time. Preliminary studies performed by Town Staff indicate approximately 31 spaces can be developed in this area. This would in essence expand the peak parking capacity of Peregrine Village to 380 spaces. This is more spaces than was included on any proposal submitted during the review and approval process and is within 2 - 6% of the parkim; required under current ordinances, depending upon actual uses. Due to conditions existing at the time of the original design review approval and the unresolved questions regarding what was actually approved in the original design review, it is recommended that parking for Peregrine Village Condominiums be approved subject to: 1. The construction of public parking facilities on the triangular portion of Tract G immediately adjacent to the west end of Peregrine Village Condominiums. L2sign and construction shall include landscaping, shall be subject to review and approval by the Town of Avon and shall be completed at no cost to the Town of Avon; 2.. Uses within the project shall be limited to general commercial such as office retail, restaurants and bars, and time-share condominiums or short term rentals. Substantial changes from these general uses shall require reevaluation and approval of parking requirements and provisions by the Town of Avon.