The URL can be used to link to this page

PZC Packet 110194PLANNING �D ZONING COMMISSION STAFMiiEPORT November 1, 1994 Lot 36, Block 2, Benchmark at Seaver Creek Duplex Final Design Review -- Roof Material Change PROJECT TYPE: Duplex ZONING: Duplex COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES INTRODUCTION Kit Wiiliams and Gail Dunning have submitted an application requesting approval of a roof material change They are proposing l amko Roofing Heritage 30, Rustic Redwood. STAFF COMMENTS The asphalt shingles are compatible with -the recent requests for a roof material the nge. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Commission approve the application as presented. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Mary Holden Town Planner PLANNING AD ZONING COMMISSION STAFF .-:SPORT November 1, 1994 Lot 36, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Duple: Final Design Review — Roof Material Change PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted (✓) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) DateSue Railton, Secretary Approved as submitted. ,"4Y/Q=-- PLANNING ~D ZONING COMMISSION STAF tEPORT November 1, 1994 Lot 24, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Deep Rock Water Building Find Design Review - Modifications PROJECT TYPE: Storage/Office ZONING: IC COMPLIES WITH ZONING^ YES INTRODUCTION: Beck and Associates, on behalf of Deep Rock Water, has submitted an application for approval of a roof overhang extension on the northwest portion of the property. The roof overhang will cover the loading dock area. The roof material and color will match the existing. STAFF COMMENTS: The overhang will extend over an existing drainage easement, where the loading dock is located. Supports for tate roof overhang will attach to an existing retaining wall, thereby eliminating any grading taking place in the drainage easement The drainage Swale is along the propert}line and the overhang does not appear to block drainage. It may extend over the easement as long as drainage is not blocked. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommendation is for approval with the following conditions. I The overhang may not block drainage 2 The new overhang must match the existing roof material and color RECOMMENDED ACTION: I Introduce Application 2. .Applicant Presentation 3 Commission Review 4 Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Mary Holden Town Planner PLANNING .AD ZONING COMMISSION STAF^EPORT November 1, 1994 Lot 24, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Deep Rock Water Building Final Design Review - Modifications PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted () Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date -O Sue Railton, Secretary Q Approved as submitted. 0. BROOM FINISH CONCRETE \� ' �� AT LOADING DOCK AREA POR ABRASIVE PINISE-- PROVIDE ALTERNATE PRICE POR 10' LONG RIBBED - CULVERT WITH OPEN INLET 1J AT TOP TO DRAIN TO DITCH ' •� �wc VERIFY SIZE WITH INTER- �°'*'+ MOUNTAIN ENGINEERING. LTD-� ittk VAT voutf- I BRONZE POLE SET IN I PER MFGR. WITH OMC I HPS. ZOSv. LOW GLAR ILLUMINATION AS M[G 3E -HINDS i _,1. nikJS PROVIDE 7/4' TAP A METER PER MATER DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS WITH 1' DIAMETER MATER LINE ISO THAT UPSIZIMG LATER CAM BE DOME EASILY) TO BUILDING AS REQUIRED PRE CODE AND LOCAL UTILITY COMPANY' O NOTTINGHAM ROAD (601 .VtRI►V LOCATI00 OF ALL MATER, SEIIEII, GAB A OTRNE UTILITY LINES IN ADVARCR-ALL SERVICES TO RE EETODED TO SLOG. SMALL COMMON TO CODE AND UTILITY SITE PLAN COIRANY REQUIREMENTS a v W W � L , Q , J � a � � Y m o ; X x ® X R— W , 0 LUCk LU v a Q V ' LLJ I -- �_ LLJ C) 0 T- a PMEM ice• r--17-- , I 15.3 @ R06F EDGE 4 X 4 Xe 3/116 TOG 5" k i / X4)� 3/16 TOG 51 , k,40 i I ; i i 1 I >L �0 1 i IGj[15.3 ' j i ' conttlnovs � ' �) for cantiliver!conditlon ! , iW/oneirow biidqinq, , i �4X4X 3/16! TOG 56'2" ! TQ W 1;;><2-7 i 3/4" SA1 E PLATFX 18" To FIT' I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I i I I I I I I 1 rvrn0 ROVI1 BRID61N6 I I I I I I I I I EDGE:OF LOADING DOCK { STEPS -7�C116X q/4" BP i r — 4J 4X Wl(o TGG 561!' — _!_ W12>(2—i 15'11" E4 -— — I— ___I_ 10I153�eldgeI_12-_-IL-_L_� 6.000'17 6.000'-h7' 07' ®R51G1)JOFR�ME b 16' 11.090' S/L RETAIN NG WALL EXIST BLDG WALL--a18'f� 8X4" EXISTING DEEP ROGK BUILDING TOS 58'0" IWFI •TOG 57'0" fca.1 4x4x3/l6 '7xl6x3/4 OF x 4 0 g ) 4 ) i I 15.3 @ R06F EDGE 4 X 4 Xe 3/116 TOG 5" k i / X4)� 3/16 TOG 51 , k,40 i I ; i i 1 I >L �0 1 i IGj[15.3 ' j i ' conttlnovs � ' �) for cantiliver!conditlon ! , iW/oneirow biidqinq, , i �4X4X 3/16! TOG 56'2" ! TQ W 1;;><2-7 i 3/4" SA1 E PLATFX 18" To FIT' I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I i I I I I I I 1 rvrn0 ROVI1 BRID61N6 I I I I I I I I I EDGE:OF LOADING DOCK { STEPS -7�C116X q/4" BP i r — 4J 4X Wl(o TGG 561!' — _!_ W12>(2—i 15'11" E4 -— — I— ___I_ 10I153�eldgeI_12-_-IL-_L_� 6.000'17 6.000'-h7' 07' ®R51G1)JOFR�ME b 16' 11.090' S/L RETAIN NG WALL EXIST BLDG WALL--a18'f� 8X4" EXISTING DEEP ROGK BUILDING TOS 58'0" IWFI •TOG 57'0" fca.1 4x4x3/l6 '7xl6x3/4 OF x 4 0 9i e d 9i OF% PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT November 1, 1994 Lot 50, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Preytis Residence Final Design Review -- Modification of Color PROJECT TYPE: Duplex ZONING: RD COMPLIES WITH ZONING" YES INTRODUCTION: The Preytis's have submitted a revised color scheme for their residence on Lot 50, Block 1, Wildridge. The proposed colors are a brown stain for the body, bluish -green -gray for the trim and maroon -red for the accent. STAFF COMMENTS The color chips will be presented at -he Commission meeting. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval as submitted. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Introduce Application 2. .Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4 Commission .Action Respectfully submitted, Mary Holden Town Planner 0% n1 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFr REnORT November 1, 1994 Lot 50, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Preytis Residence Final Design Review — Modification of Color PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted (I ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Dated /09t, Sue Railton, Secretaryj, tz- �' fpproved as submitted. 1 PLANNING nND ZONING COMMISSION STAF. REPORT november I. 1994 Lot 63, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Seasons at Avon Final Design Review -Master Sign Program I PROJECT TYPE: Master Sign Program (ZONING: TC COMPLIES WITH ZONING? Yes INTRODUCTION Lary Ast has submitted an application adding tenant signage to the Master Sign Program for the Seasons at Avon. Attached are the requested additions. REQUEST: The additional sign area will total approximately 247 square feet. Due to the mass of the building, it appears that the additional sign area will not over crowd the building. STAFF COMMENTS "Sign Guidelines" and review criteria from the Sign Code. Section 15.28.060 Sign Design Guidelines A. Harmonious. with Town Scale. Sign location, configuration, design, materials, and colors should be harmonious with the existing signs on the stricture, with the neighborhood, and with the townscape. B. Harmonious with Building Scale. the sign should be harmonious with the building scale. and should not visually dominate the structure to which it belongs or call undue attention to itself C Materials. Quality sign materials, including anodized metal; routed or sandblasted wood, such as rough cedar or redwood, interior -lit, individual Plexiglas -faced letters; or three dimensional individual letters with or without indirect lighting, are encouraged. Sign materials, such as printed pivwood, interior -lit box -type plastic, and paper nr vinyl stick -on window signs are discouraged, but may be approved, however, if determined appropriate to the location, at the sole discretion of the Commission D Architectural Harmony The sign and its supporting structure should be in harmony architecturally, and in harmony in color with the sun-ounding structures E Landscaping. Landscaping is required for all free-standing signs, and should be designed to enhance the signage and surrounding building landscaping t�1 �. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF KEPORT november 1, 1994 Lot 63, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Seasons at Avon Final Design Review -Master Sign Program F. Reflective Surfaces. Reflective surfaces are not allowed. G. Lighting. Lighting should be of no greater wattage than is necessary to make the sign visible at night, and should not reflect unnecessarily onto adjacent properties. Lighting sources, except neon tubing, should not be directly visible to passing pedestrians or vehicles, and should be concealed in such a manner that direct light does not shine in a disturbing manner. H. Location. On multi -story buildings, individual business signs shall generally be limited to the ground level. Section 15.28.070 - Sin Design Review Criteria In addition to the sign Design Guidelines listed above, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall also consider the following criteria while reviewing proposed sign designs: A. The suitability of the improvement, including materials with which the sign is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located: Comment The proposed sign is consistent with the Town's Sign Design Guidelines. B. The nature of adjacent and neighboring improvements: Comment: The sign materials are consistent with allowed signs on adjacent and neighboring buildings. C. The quant; of the materials to be utilized in any proposed improvement Comment The quality of the proposed sign materials are acceptable D. The visual impact of any proposed improvement as viewed from any adjacent or neighboring property: Comment: The visual impact of these proposed improvements will be consistent with existing area signs. E. The objective that no improvement will be so similar or dissimilar to other signs in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic , will be impaired Comment The proposal meets the intent of this criteria. F. Whether the type, height, size, and/or quantity of signs generally complies with the sign code and appear to be appropriate for the project PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAF1 _.SPORT november 1, 1994 Lot 63, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Seasons at Avon Final Design Review -Master Sign Program Comment: The type, size and location of the proposed sign generally complies with the Sign Code. G. Whether the sign is primarily oriented to vehicular or pedestrian traffic, and whether the sign is appropriate for the determined orientation. Comment: These signs are primarily oriented toward vehicular traffic. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Planning and Zoning approve this application as presented. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully Submitted tN1 Mary Holden Holden Town Planner I• l4M PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFI- _:'SPORT november 1. 1994 Lot 63, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Seasons at Avon Final Design Review -Master Sign Program PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( V' Approved with recommended conditions ( ) A -proved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptuai, No Action ( j Date llwld / Sue Railton, Secretary Approved as ,L� O C T - 2 3- C 4 !SUI -4 1 7: 4M H 1 C H T E C H S I G "S DATE: October 23, 1994 TO: Mary Holden Town of Avon Planning FROM: Larry Ast RE: Seasons at v I IjCG(J P - 0 1 At your request I have prepared the following list of approved signage for the Seasons at Avon building. Note that some of the signage is directional verses property identification or tenant adveitising. ;.quare footaac -- informational prop ident comm Ident Initial approval: 1. Monument sign- primarily directional 2 faces 30" 48" 20 2. Portico 2 faces approx. 24" x 192" 32 3. Parking entry approx 20" x 192" 26 4. Parking exit approx 12" x 168" 14 S. North sign Seasons 24" x 192" 32 6. Four towers - summer, fall, winter, spring size based upon straight line text 84 First amendment: 1. Vail Associates Corp Office- South East Corner 20 2. Wing wall- main entry, Vail Associates 9 Season at Avon S 3. East do West Towers approx 128 x 12 each 21 HIGHTECHSIGNS P.O. Box 2689 Production Center Ag en & Vail, CO 81658 910 Notungham Road Glenwood Spr9% 303.949.4565 Suite S.2 303.945.6695 FAX: 9494670 Avon, CO 91620 OCT. -23-94 Amendment 02 SUN 17 :4M -1. 1. Vail Associates Training Center 66" x 16" 2. Prater Lane Play School 76" x 16' 3. 8 Commercial Tenants 7 x 30 sq. Ft. Plus one at 22.5 Total H I G H T E C H S I G N S 7 8 232 165 98 263 Please also note that the building is some 600 feet long, and that the signage is split between the north and south sides. if you need additional information, please advise. No;: the revised sizes on items 1 do 2 above. R. OM G� FIZO S 0 " d U m Ho 3 1 H D I H £ b= l T H n S b 6- ri Z- 1 o 0 cam---� ON� O'= --� o r- o RR nn S 0 " d U m Ho 3 1 H D I H £ b= l T H n S b 6- ri Z- 1 o 0 Imp 100 DATE: October 17. 1994 f O: Mary Holden Town of Avon Planning FRONT: Larry Ast RE: Seasons Avon Amendment #2 to Season At Avon Sign Program Change 41: Addition of Corporate Logo and "Vail Associates, Inc. Corporate Training Center" Material- gold painted aluminum letters. Same as previously approved Placement- south west comer of building overhang, flush mounted. See exhibit I -A. Change #2: Addition of Corporate Logo and "Prater Lane Play School' Material- gold painted aluminum letters. Same as previously approved Placement- north west side of building See exhibits 2-A. Change #3 Commercial Tenant Signage Each tenant locate.! in spaces I to 8, as shown on exhibit 3-A will be allowed one sign area as shown on exhibit 3-13 The square footage allowed for single tenant use is shown on exhibit 3-C Raceways will not be permitted Materials - Illuminated portions- gold painted reverse pan channel letters with white glow from letters onto building The maximum letter height will be 18" All illuminated letters will conform to UL standards The name of the business will be illuminated The nature of the business and logos (to!al for nature and logos not to exceed 40`6 of the sign area utilized) are encouraged to be internally illuminated Non -illuminated portions - gold painted metal letters and logo, minimum of 1/4" thick, maximum height 8" for text, and 18" for logo These shall be flush mounted to the wall The gold color, texture and finish shall be similar to the existing text on the building HIGHTECH.SIGNS P.O. Box 2688 Production Center Aspcn & Vail, CO 81658 910 Nottingham Road GlcnNood Sprgs 303.939.4565 Suitc S 2 3113.945,6695 FAX 949.4670 Aeon, CO 81620 so Type styles- not restricted, but minimum stroke of 1.75' is needed for reverse pan channel letters. Temporary signage- tenants may hang a temporary banner on the location of the permanent signage. This may be hung after submission to the Town of Avon for permanent signage and for application for the temporary banner. The time limit shall be 90 days during which the application for permanent signage is being approved, and the signs are being fabricated. Colors shall be a tan banner with brown or gold text. All signage shall require approval by the condominium association prior to submission to the Town of Avon. Window lettering and sale signage shall -equire approval of the condominium association and the Town of Avon. All tenants are required to remove their signs and patch and paint all holes in a professional manner upon vacating their space. All signs shall be maintained in a first class condition. If a tenant occupies more than one space, they may combine the square footage allowed for the total space, but the utilized portion for signage cannot exceed 45 square feet. if the space is subdivided, the tenants must share the allocated signage square footage limitations. Tenants shall be responsible for obtaining and pay the cost of all permits and signage. TECHSIGNS .. SIGN DRAWING P.O. BOX 2688. VAIL, CO 81658. 303.949.4565 . FAX: 303.949.4670 ni-< L�'iT� k� *pii" N R x 161 . VP, 1L. Ass Q< At( s :t;v C°rE ITAIAllds JOB N__ __//� _. ____ DATE.._ _ BY—_. /UE LARn.' kc r CLIENT )L A S ,A-11A/C.��3[FS�6lS__......_CONTACT- JQC- A1!}"af SCALEPHONE --- - FAX. id == = =TM ECHSIGNS SIGN DRAWING P.O. BOX 2688. VAR, CO 81658. 303.949.4565. FAX: 303.949.4670 S) a *AJPA�l , 7oi'x IS,. mra (} PDzit- ez !�y Sc-wJaa/ JOB M------- DATE— BY— — - - - /VE__1F CLIENT -U46. IqfJ-UCIAlrf W_c_� SCALE PHONE FAX: •1 401 �= = =TECHSIGNS SIGN DRAWING P.O. BOX 2688. VAR- CO 81658. 303.949.4565. FAX: 303.949.4670 THE 5EA50N5 AT AVON m ewuwv.r,c w. Avon � l� &AlVix L -f play Sc�FooL 'c Cnnn� ue*- ?7NpA(YJ ['9 N VA/, A S.Ar(j iw[ tory F.4AIC raA J [6W7X,4 JOB 1t DATE BY _ '✓EAs�_� CLIENT_ N5 /7 ilVD� CONTACT Sfl�rc mac, ✓ SCALE__ PHONE FAX: 40 11131 ITECHSIGNS SIGN DRAWING P.O. BOX 2688. VAR, CO 81658. 303.949.4565 . FAX: 303.949.4670 1/Pf(L.I f S $y Sf"-e_f_ JOB Jf_ DATE B`.'___ A/E 1' CLIENT _ Aln J CONTACT iE ✓ _ SCALE PHONE FAX: .W �= - ITECHSIGNS . . JOB SIGN DRAWING P.O. BOX 2688 . VAR, CO 81658. 303.949.4565. FAX: 303.949.4670 space sq. footage max width ore x number allowed allowed frontage 1 2 30 15 56 3 30 15 36 4 30 15 52 530 30 15 42 6 15 30 7 22.5 9 12 8 30 15 44 30 15 22 DATE- BY - CLIENT 2 ,A)!; ��/ CONTACT_ffYr/P __ SCALE_ PHONE -- FAX: 0 I GI ITECHSIGNS KMGMWOW.. 2 SIGN DRAWING P.O. BOX 2688 . VAIL, CO 81 658 .303.949.4565 . FAX: 303.949.4670 JOB 1f DATE _ BY___ _ A/E—lt/Z �_�l CLIENT_ S26B' /}r &} ?,) --CONTACT_��/f �G/c�i✓ SCALE PHONE FAX: ASMIN. PLANNING AAD ZONING COMMISSION STAFI• REPORT November 1. 1994 Lot 84, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision JMB Enterprises - 4-Plex Final Design Review—Condition of Approval PROJECT TYPE: 4 -flex ZONING: PUD, 4 Units COMPLIES WITH ZONING? Yes INTRODUCTION: This project received approval on September 6, 1994 with conditions of approval. One of the conditions of approval was the landscape plan be submitted for review and approval by the Commission. STAFF COMMENTS: The landscape plan and plant material list are attached to the report. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: As a condition of approval, Staff has no recommendation. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully Submitted Mary Holden Town Planner PLANNING AD ZONING COMMISSION STAFftEPORT November 1, 1994 Lot 84, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision JMB Enterprises - 4 -Plea Final Design Review --Condition of Approval PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions (� Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date Sue Railton, Secretary '.Oa� 444�"-' The Commission approved with the following conditions: 1. An irregularly shaped landscape island, directly opposite of the _ firc mi as you enter the driveway• 2. The addition of 5 trees either 2 inch caliber aspens or spurce with sta f approval. - I i.+rJifi E _ir�J;:s T-TFEIk,'::' CF-FE;z G GG : 65ITT E -C c� GpQ Q11�ay�jl�NC��ASP_EI C9 /�G �E'ItJE CUIz.rL � sc_ sAn, � cu�eeY 6P � �✓ DIZl�p r�Trr. C-H1=GIJLE CONTOUR MAP -------------- LOT 84, BLOCK 1, WILDRIDGE Eagle County, Colorado I� 9 =9.4} hrT�oGD4.� t"L7 JG�1T5Tl JT K7— LLA.b L CONTOUR MAP -------------- LOT 84, BLOCK 1, WILDRIDGE Eagle County, Colorado I� 9 =9.4} As O d elNOlgn JW ICV o' a elerin ". teener, "4. �O Eelemenl ror /IMI mpnhMwte, O.c�nep, ono tee• $Woof ��n Ele• m. On19( x% 6G , R/m Eh• 95.5' SC♦LF 1._10' 0 a 10 ;, 90 S0 40 ELENA! IONS. LOT 85 Assumed elevation of 100.0• on electric box Concrete pad. MONUMENTS: o Found Aluminum cap LS 5447 m No monument found \ P.eLIM L'.. m 'I LAI �N po, �\/ '1 0101, "° i •L, E0'1m1.1 /0. 'roar � f •' <,•' / � � � A 0-d 500. 41.9 9, 11F,- PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFMEPORT November 1, 1994 Lot 1, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision Strategic Enterprises 4 PI -!x Condition of Approval — Landscape Plan and Color Rendering PROJECT TYPE: 4 Plex ZONING: PUD COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES INTRODUCTION: Strategic Enterprises received Final Design Review Approval cf a fourplex on July 19, 1994 with conditions. Two of the conditions of approval are a ,-evised landscape plan be brought back for Commission approval and a color rendering be submitted for Commission review. Both have been submitted and are before you tonight for review and approval STAFF COMMENTS The proposed landscape plan and plant material list is included in your packet The proposed landscape plan indicates Phase 1 and Phase II Staff is reviewing the landscape plan as a whole, not phased The colored rendering will be presented at the meeting STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff would recommend the following condition I The entire landscape plan be installed and not phased RECOMMENDED ACTION: I Introduce Application Z Applicant Presentation 3 Commission Review -S Commissura Action Respectfully submitted- Nla . Holden Town Planner 0% ^ PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFA AEPORT November 1, 1994 Lot 1, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision Strategic Enterprises 4 Plea Condition of Approval — ! andscape Plan and Color Rendering PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions (/) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Coatinued br') Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date� /Q4G Sue Railton, Secretary lle& — The Commission an nroved with the following conditions: 1. All do -ie at once. N 8 U N m m® 2 2?� Z?� 2 2 Z N r A 1-4 a - z ii PLANNING AD ZONING COMMISSION STAF� PORT November 1, 1994 Lot 44, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision Reynolds Residence Final Design Review - Site Modifications PROJECT TYPE: Resii!ential - ZONING: PUC? COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES INTRODUCTION: Buz Remolds Jr. has submitted an application requesting approval of a barbecue area in the back yard of his residence. It will be southwest of the existing basketball court STAFF COMMENTS: The area will he approximately 15' by 20' and contain a bench of stones STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommendation is for approval with the following condition: 1. The disturbed area be revegetated with native grasses and bushes. RECOM MEN DED ACTION: I. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3, Commi:,sion Review 4. Commission Action Respectfiully submitted, Mary Holden Town Planner PLANNING r,kiQD ZONING COMMISSION STAFA ttEPORT November 1, 1994 Lot 44, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision Reynolds Residence Final Design Review - Site Modifications PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued (✓S Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date Sue Railton, Secretary wt up .• 11111114 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT November 1, 1994 Lot 3, Block 3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Westgate PUD Variance - Parking Requirements PROJECT TYPE. Commercial/Office ZONING: PUD COMPLIES WITH ZONING? No, Requires a Variance to Parking Requirements This is a Public Hearing for a variance to the Parking Requirements, on Lot 3, Block 3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek. iNTRODUCTION: Ricl: Pylman, on behalf of Elk Meadow Inc., in requesting a variance to the parking requirements as stipulated in Title 17 and their PUD development plan. REQUEST: The applicant is requesting to operate the restaurant during lunch with a limited seating area of 900 square feet and open the entire restaurant for dinner. The entire restaurant would be 4,150 square feet. 2800 square feet would be on the first floor and 1350 square feet would be on the second floor. Restaurant uses are allowed within the PUD, however, parking v as not provided for restaurant uses. The project was assessed 4 per 1,000 square feet of commercial/retail for the first floor, and 3 per 1,000 square feet of office for the second floor. The 4,150 square feet is 0ocated 15 parking spaces. Parking requirements for restaurant use is I space per 60 square feet of seating area. The 15 spaces allocated to the 4,150 square feet would allow for a restaurant seating area of 900 square feet, which the applicant is requesting for lunch. The entire restaurant would be open for evening operation, and utilize the parking spaces allocated to the office and retail spaces. STAFF COMMENTS: This tyre of variance was approved on Lot 20, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek, for Gratzie's restaurant. As of this date, Staff has had no complaints, however, Gratzie's is only open for evening hours. Before acting on a variance application, the Commission shall consider the following factors with respect to the requested variance. Section 17.36.40, Approval Criteria A. The relationship of the requested variance to existing and potential uses and structures in the vicinity. PLANNING �&ND ZONING COMMISSION STAFh REPORT November 1, 1994 Lot 3, Block 3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Westgate PUD Variance - Parking Requirements Comment:. A parking reduction was approved for Sunridge, Phase Il to allow construction of a clubhouse. B. The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibly and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity. Comment. The degree of relief being sought is minimal. Sunridge, Phase 11 received a reduction in parking Ind this application is requesting to utilize parking spaces for after hours use. The day time operation will be limited to e00 square feet of seating area, which requires 15 narking spaces. C. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population, trar;portation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety. Comment. The effect of the request will no negative impacts on light, air, population, transportation, traffic facilities, public facilities, utilities or public safety. D. Such other factors and criteria as the Commission deems applicable to the requested variance. Comment Staff has not identified any other factors for the Commission to consider FINDINGS REQUIRED: The Planning and Zoning Commission shall make the following findings before granting a variance A. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties in the vicinity. B. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the pul lic health, safety, or welfare, or-iwerially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. C. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons: i. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title; ii. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the vicinity; I% r-, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT November 1, 1994 Lot 3, Block 3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Westgate PUD Variance - Parking Requirements iii. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the vicinity. r STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND FINDINCS: Staff recommendation is for adoption of Resolution No. 94-25 which includes the required findings and approves the variance from the parking requirements as stipulated in Title 17. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Open Public hearing 4. Close Public Hearing 5. Commission Review 6. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Mary Holden Town Planner PLANNING n81) ZONING COMMISSION STAFr &SPORT November 1, 1994 Lot 3, Block 3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Westgate PUD Variance - Parking Requi-ements PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted (✓j Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date% /Sue Railton, Secretary The Commission approved Resolution 94-25 with the `ollowing conditions: 1. The parking /ariance for the 4,150 square feet of restaurant ---7roporerl--Crnd-t�t or the Westgate PUD. 2. Only 900 square feet of restaurant seating area is allowed to be utilized Drior to 5:15 Dm. 3. Only 1,781 square feet of restaurant seating area is allowed to be utilized after 5 pm. IL I TOWN OF AVON PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 94 - 25 SERIES OF 1994 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE FROM THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS AS STIPULATED IN TITLE 17 OF THE AVON MUNICIPAL CODE, FOR LOT 3, BLOCK 3, BENCHMARK AT BEAVER CREEK, TOWN OF AVON, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO WHEREAS, Elk Meadow Inc., owner of Lot 3, Block 3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, has applied for a variance from the "Off Street Parking "requirements as stipulated in itle 17, of the Avon Municipal Code, and WHEREAS, a public hearing has been held by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of A• on, pursuant to notices required by law, at which time the applicant and the public were given an opportunity to express their opinions and present certain information and reports regarding i: -,e proposed Parking Variance application, and WI IEREAS, following said public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the "]'own of Avon has determined I *1 he variance is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity 2. Appr^val of the variance will not constitute a grand of special privilege god 3. The requested variance will have no detrimental effect on light .and an, distribution of population, transportation and traffic facilities, and public facilities and utilities, and public safety, and IV! ►I'P.?.1,S, ,hc P13rr°c ; :- J SERIES OF 1994 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE FROM THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS AS STIPULATED IN TITLE 17 OF THE AVON MUNICIPAL CODE, FOR LOT 3, BLOCK 3, BENCHMARK AT BEAVER CREEK, TOWN OF AVON, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO WHEREAS, Elk Meadow Inc., owner of Lot 3, Block 3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, has applied for a variance from the "Off Street Parking "requirements as stipulated in Title 17, of the Avon Municipal Code, and WI IEREAS, a public hearing has been held by the Planning and "Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon, pursuant io notices required by law, at which time the applic, nt and the public were given an opportunity to express their opinions and present certain information and reports regarding the proposed Parking Variance application, and WHEREAS, following said public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Down of Avon has determined. I The variance is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity. Approval of the variance will not constitute a grand of special privilege: and 3 The requested variance will have no detrimental effect on light and air, distribution of population, transportation and traffic facilities, and public facilities and utilities, and public safety, and WHEREAS, the Planning and "Zoning Commission finds A. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of r 1 special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties in the vicinity. B. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, Safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. C. That the variance is war anted for the following reasons: i. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the regwation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title, ii. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties iq the vicinity. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon, Colorado, hereby approves a parking variance from the requirement of Title 17 of the Avon Municipal Code for Lot 3, Block 3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek, Town of Avon, Eagle County Colorado, subject to the following condition: I The parking variance is for the 4,150 square feet of restaurant proposed and does not apply to any other restaurant use for the Westgate PUD. 2. Only 900 square feet of restaurant seating area is allowed to be utilized prior to 5 15 PM 3. Only 1,860 square feet of restaurant seating area is allowed to be utilized after 5:15 PM. ADOPTED THIS DAY OS" Secretary 1994 i. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardslup inconsistent with the objectives of this title, ii. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the vicinity. NOW, THEREFUtE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon, Colorado, hereby approves a parking variance from the requirement of Title 17 of the Avon Municipal Code for Lot 3, Block 3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek, Town of Avon, Eagle County Colorado, subject to the following condition: I . The parking variance is for the 4,150 square feet of restaurant proposed and does not apply to any other restaurant use for the Westgate PUD, 2. Only 900 square feet of restaurant seating area is allowed to be utilized prior to 5:15 PM. 3. Only 1,860 square feet of restaurant seating area is allowed to be utilized after 5:15 PM. ADOPTED THIS / DAY OF Secretary _ 1994 ty- PLANNING HND ZONING COMMISSION STAF1, REPORT November 1, 1994 Lot 63, Block 1, Wildridge Guida Duplex Variance - Side Yard Se`back PROJECT TYPE: Duplex ZONING: PUD COMPLIES WITH ZONING? No. Requires a Variance to Side Yard Setback This is a Public Hearing for a variance to the Side Yard Setback Requirements, on Lot 63, Block 1, Wildridge. INTRODUCTION: Two property owners within 300' were not notified, per the Code requirements. Therefore, a public hearing on this matter may not be held. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommendation is for the Commission to table the item until the November 15, 1994 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Open Public Hearing 4. Close Public Hearing 5. Commission Review 6. Commission .Action Respectfully submitted, Mary Holden Town Planner PLANNING, -%8D ZONING COMMISSION STAFI, REPORT November 1, 1994 Lot 63, Block', Wildridge Guida Duplex Variance - Side Yard Setback PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued (4 Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date400/ Sue Railton, Secretary The Commission tabled request until the November 15, 1994 P&Z meeting. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT November 1. 1994 Lot 55, Block 2, Benchmark Century 21 Final Design Review -Sign Program PROJECT TYPE: Commercial -Master Sign Program ZONING: Town Center COMPLIES WITH ZONING? Yes INTRODUCTION Lot 55, Ltd. submitted an application for approval of a modified sign program for the Century 21 building on September 6, 1994. At that meeting, the Commission approved the modifications to the second floor tenants and requested the first floor tenant signage be brought back for Commission review and approval Lot 55, Ltd. has submitted an application for the first floor tenants. The original sign program was approved on lune 15, 1993. REQUEST: Please refer to the attached information, which includes the originally approved program, the request modifying the program and the current request. STAFF COMMENTS The applicant is requesting approval of the first floor tenant signage as presented in the original Master Sign Program on June 15, 1993. The only change is the color of the awnings. The color will be presented at the meeting. GUIDELINES AND REVIEW CRITERIA Section 15.28.060 Sipn Design Guidelines A. Harmonious with Town Scale. Sign location, configuration, design, materials, and colors should be harmonious with the existing signs on the structure, with the neighborhood, and with the townscape B. Harmonious with Building Scale. the sign should be harmonious with the building scale, and should not visually dominate the structure to which it belongs or call undue attention to itself C Materials Quality sign materials, including anodized metal, routed or sandblasted wood, such as rough cedar or redwood, interior -lit, individual Plexiglas -faced letters, or three dimensional individual letters with or without indirect lighting, are encouraged. Sign materials, such as printed plywood, interior -lit box -type plastic, and paper or vinyl stick -on window signs are discouraged, but may be approved, however, if determined appropriate to the location, at the sole discretion of the Commission. Al A PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF PORT November 1, 1994 Lot 55, Blank 2, Benchmark Century 2: Final Design Review -Sign Program D. Architectural Harmony. The sign and its supporting structure should be in harmony architecturally, and in harmony in color with the surrounding structures. E. Landscaping. Landscaping is required for all free-standing signs, and should be designed to enhance the signage and surrounding building landscaping. F. Reflective Surfaces. Reflective surfaces are not allowed. G. Lighting. Lighting should be of no greater wattage than is necessary to make the sign visible at night, and should not reflect unnecessarily onto adjacent properties. Lighting sources, except neon tubing, should not be directly visible to passing pedestrians or vehicles, and should be concealed in such a manner that direct light does not shine in a disturbing manner. H. Location. On multi -story buildings, individual business signs shall generally be limited to the ground level. Section 15.28.070 --Sign Design Review Criteria In addition to the sign Design Guidelines listed above, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall also consider the following criteria while reviewing proposed sign designs: A The suitability of the improvement, including materials with which the sign is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located: B_ The nature of adjacent and neighboring improvements: C. The quality of the materials to be utilized in any proposed improvement: D The visual impact of any proposed improvement as viewed from any adjacent or neighboring property: E The objective that no improvement will be so similar or dissimilar to other signs in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic , will be impaired. F. Whether the type, height, size, and/or quantity of signs generally complies N ith the sign code and appear to be appropriate for the project G. Whether the sign is primarily oriented to vehicular or pedestrian traffic, and whether the sign is appropriate for the determined orientation. PLANNING ,-.ND ZONING COMMISSION STAF. REPORT November 1, 1994 Lot 55, Block 2, Benchmark Century 21 Final Design Review -Sign Program STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Planning and Zoning approve this application with the following conditions, which reflect the original conditions of approval and the conditions of approval for the modification of September 6, 1994: 1. All awnings be installed at the same time. 2. No less than 50% of each sign reflect the actual name of the business. 3. The monument sign, the 2 directional signs, the kiosk and the second floor signs, as modified on September 6, 1994, which will be 9 inch non -illuminated three dimensional block letters suspended below the lentils and recessed and the color to be either green to match the metal or brushed brass to match the Centrury 21 sign. 4. Lighting be approved by Staff prior to installation. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully Submitted Mary Holden Town Planner A°w PLANNING , ND ZONING COMMISSION STAF. REPORT November 1, 1994 ,Lot 55, Block 2, Benchmark Century 21 Final Design Review -Sign Program PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions (./j Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date l{lasy /r�/egw Sue Railton, Secretary The Commission approved with the following findings and a list of applicant items: 1. All awnings be installed at the same time 2. No less than 500," of each sign reflect the actual name of the business. 3. The monument sign, the 2 directional signs, the kiosk and the second floor signs, as modified on September 6, 1994, which will be 9 inch non -illuminated three dimensional block letters suspended below the lentils and recessed and the color to be ei er green o ma e Century 21 sign. Lig ting e approve�y S-taf prior'to insta—TTation. Applicant Items: 1. Allowable First Level signage as approved by the P&Z Commission on June 15, 1993; 2. "Button Sign" as requested on the revised Sign Plan dated August 16, 1994; 3. Century 21 "Anchor Tenant" sign on the southwest elevation will be black letters with gold "house/bar" logo; 4. All other signage as noted in the "Sign Plan -Century 21 Building" as previously presented and approved on 15, 1993 and clarified at the August 16, 1994 meeting. cc: Larry LyBarger Jerry Landeck Ed Smith Dan Danyluk Charlie Johnson John Trtanj Mark Kersting DANE: Tuesday November 1, 1994 TO: Town of Avon Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Robert Kaufmann, AIA RE: Century 21 Building - Master Sign Plan The following is a list of the items to be clarified and/or a&iressed in the motion for approval of the Century 21 Building - Master Sign Plan; 1. Allowable First Level signage as approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission on June 15,1993. 2. "Button Sign" as requested on the revised Sign Plan dated August 16,1994. 3. Century 21 "Anchor Tenant" sign on the southwest elevation will be black letters with gold "house/ bar" logo. 4. All other signage as noted in the "Sign Plan - Century 21 Building" as previously presented and approved on June 15,194 and clarified at the August 16,1994 P&Z meeting. 3 PZMOTN2.DOC y�r ��11I I lel) Am DRENMENT CO October 25, 1994 Town of Avon Planning and Zoning Commission HAND DELIVERED c/o Mary Holder) P.O. Box 975 Avon, Colorado 81620 Re: Lot 55, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Dear Mary: Lot 55, Ltd., the owner of the building, and three of its tenants, ECQC, Ltd. (d/b/a "Quizno's Classic Subs"), WBB Management, Inc. (d/b/a "Base Mountain Sports") and Century 21 Vail Valley, Inc., are hereby requesting approval of the following by the planning and zoning commission: 1. Verification that the master signage program for the first floor of the building as approved on June 15, 1993 remains approved. Some of the modifications to this portion of the sign program which we requested on September 6, 1994 were rejected (in particular, substituting decorative metal frames for the original awnings). It was our understanding that even though some modifications were rejected, the original approval (burgundy awnings) is still valid. 2. Amend the sign program to change the color of the awnings. 3. Approval of Ouizno's signage. This program is in conformance with the June 15, 1993 approved sign program, as modified on September 6, 1994. While we believe the "button sign" on the stairwell wall adjacent to the Tenant's entry was in fact approved on September 19, 1994, we ask the commission to specifically approve it again at this time. 4. Approval of Base Mountain Sports signage. This program is in conformance with the June 15, 1993 approved sign program, as modified on September 6, 1994. 5. Approval of Century 21 Vail Valley, Inc. signage. This program is in conformance with the June 15, 1993 approved sign program, as modified on September 6, 1994. 100 W. Bever Creek Blvd. Pint Office NIX iWo 'Pt:l. )101) 9 N1-'980 Avon Center, Suite 230 Avon. Colorado 81620 F:1.\ 6N i 919 '984 Town of Avon Planning and Zoning Commission c/o Mary Holden October 25, 1994 Page Two Enclosed are drawings of the signage for #3, #4 and #5. Color samples for #2 will be brought to the meeting on November 1. Please contact me if you require any additional information prior to or at the meeting of November 8, 1994. Very truly yours, LOT 55, LTD. SHAPIRO DEVELOPMENT CO., GENERAL PARTNER By: ( y �3e Landeck Executive Vice President Enclosures cc: Ken Shapiro Charles E. Johnson, IV - ECQC John M. Trtanj - WBB Management, Inc. SIGN FLAN Approved June 25,1993 Revised August 16,1994 CENTURY 21 BUILDING LOT 55 - BLOCK 2 BENCHMARK, AT BEAVER CREEK AVON, CO 81620 DEVELOPER: Lot 55, ', J. Shapiro Development Co., General Partner P. 0. Box 5640, Avon, CO 81620 Introduction: It is the purpose of this sign plan to serve the communications needs of the landlord (Lot 55, Ltd.) and the present and future tenants while creating an upscale, effective sign program commensurate with the building and surrounding area. The plan addresses the following criteria: 1. Identify the project and its tenants to vehicular and pedestrian traffic. 2. Identify site circulation, including traffic and building entrances, parking and tenant locations. 3. Restrict other signage that doesn't meet these objectives. A. Purpose The purpose of this sign program is to serve as a guide for all initial and future exterior building identification and tenant signage. All signage shall be of superior quality and image and shali be compatible with the architecture and design of the Century 21 Building. B. General 1. TENANT SIGNAGE The building consists of commercial tenant space on two floors, being equally divided between frontage on Avon Road and West Beaver Creek Boulevard On the First Floor: Tenant signage will be mounted on a painted Architectural Metal Fr re- work of 3" square stock and 1" 16 flat lattice. Each section of Frar ie -work. will run between the columns, just below the lintel. It will allow for 3 "intern._: y illuminated type sign (ie; pan -channel letters) with maxirr im display area of 12 square feet. Allocation of these signage areas c, uld occur between any pair of columns (less than or in addition to, wht t is presently shown on exhibit A), at the Landlord's discretion. In addition, a "button" sign, approximately 12.5 square feet, will b , located on the South Elevation as shown on Exhibit 8 & C. On the Second Floor: Tenant signage will consist of 9" non -illuminated three dimensions block letters ("Dropped Letters") suspended below the lintels and recess d. Allocation of these signage areas could occur between any pair o' --olumns (in addition to what is presently shown on exhibit A), at the lanclb -d's discretion. In addition, the "Anchor Tenant" identification sign will be locate just behind the metal arch, on the northeast elevation, and mounted t r the aluminum storefront system. The letters will be constructed of t ushed or polished, three dimensional, metal letters any may be backed by semitransparent metal lattice as shown on exhibit A. A similar or identical sign shall be permitted on the exterior of th building at the southwest elevation facing the plaza as shown in Exhibit :. See Exhibit "A" for typical placement of tenant signage for each 'evel, details of Architectural Metal Frame -work, and specifications. 2. TENANT DISPLAY SIGNAGE Space is reserved at each tenant location, between building colun ns, for a neon or other illuminated sign to be placed behind the center glas s panel (as approved by the Landlord) as indicated in Exhibit A and approt ed on June 25, 1993. First floor tenanta, at each glass grouping betwee t building columns, may have up to 10 square feet of suzh illuminated signa le. In the event the Landlord elects not to install second floor Droppea Lett !rs', neon or other illuminated signage may be substituted per window ,,Iroup,ng. A maximum of three neon signs on each side of the building will b, allowed on the second level. Each tenant with direct doorway access to the outside of the building may place name, street address, and business identification signage directly upon, or adjacent to the glass doors. Additionally, business hours may also be displayed. 3. BUILDING IDENTIFICATION SIGN A non -illuminated debossed copy, which may be painted to slightly contrast with the building and shall be permitted on the Lintel above the metal arch as shown in Exhibits A. 4. FREE-STANDING MONUMENT SIGNS Up to four, free-standing monument signs shall be allowed (see Exhibit DI• Signs at the primary entrance areas will display building name plus name of adjacent building (Avon Center Building). Two, smaller signs shall be for directional information only. Each may be internally or externally illuminated. As approved June 2a, 1993. Specific designs shall be forthcoming. A four-sided kiosk may be constructed and located as approved on June 25, 1993. This fixti re may be illuminated internally and externally. Display area will be allocated by the Landlord for use by the commercial tenants. 5. PARKING LOT SIGNS The landlord reserves the right to place individual signs, not to exceed 12" x 1$" in each size and conforming to standard parking information configurations, for each parking space for the purpose of regulating usage of parking facilities as approved June 25, 1993. These signs will include required "handicapped" zoning. 6. COLORS, LOGOS AND TYPOGRAPHY Architectural Metal Frarne-work shall be consistent throughout and Forest Green in color (to match the metal roof, storefront...) as shown in Exhibit A. Second floor signage will be Forest Green in color as shown in Exhibit A. First Floor signage will be illuminated and may contain logos and/or text within prescribed areas. Copy and logo colors shall be compatible with Frame -work, surrounding colors and shall be used at the discretion of the Landlord. 7. TEMPORARY SIGNAGE "Wl�N r Temporary signage, identifying a new tenant, in the absence of, or during production of permanent signage, or a nature a,id size acceptable to the landlord, shall be alloorable for a period not to exceed 30 days from the date of permanent signage application. Temporary signs may not exceed the total square footage allowable as permanent signage as approved June 25, 1993. Placement shall be allowed at the discretion of the landlord. 8. MISCELLANEOUS All the following shall be applicable to meet the general sign requirements of the Century 21 Quilding: 1. Tenants shall be responsible for obtaining all proper permits prior to installation of temporary or permanent signs. 2. All mounting components, fasteners and electric service and equipment shall be in complete compliance with all applicable codes anc' regulations. 3. The landlord shall have the right to approve all contractors used by the tenant under this sign program. 4. Landlord shall have approved tenant signage prior to obtaining a permit. Exhibits Included: A. North / Northeast / East building elevations and details B. Plaza elevation C. South elevation and details D. Site Plan LOT55\SIGN.DOC 041G.`TECH SIGNS SIGN PLAN June 8, 1993 C RY 21 BUILDING Signs That Mean Busis-ess LOT 55 - BLOCK 2 BENCHMARK AT BEAVER CREEK AVON, CO 81620 DEVELOPER Shapiro Development Company P.O. Box 5640, Avon, CO 81620 Introduction: It is the purpose of this sign plan to serve the communications needs of the landlord (Shapiro Development Co.) and the various tenants while creating an upscale. effective sign program commensurate with the building and surrounding area. The plan should meet the following criteria: 1. Identify the project and its tenants to vehicular and pedestrian traffic. 2. Identify site circulation, including traffic and building entrances, parking and tenant locations. 3. Restrict other signage that doesn't meet these objectives. A. Purpose The purpose of this cion program is to serve as a guide for all initial and future exterior building identification and tenant signage. Al signage shall be of superior quality and image and shall be compatible with the architecture and desicn of the Century 21 Building as well as surrounding structures and landscaping. B. General 1. TENANT AWNING SIGNAGE The building consists of commercial tenant space on the first floor and the second level, being equally divided between frontage on Avon Road and Benchmark Boulevard. There will be awnings, as shown in plans previously approved by the DRB on the first floor, and optional awnings on the second floor as shown in Exhibit /I & C EacH awning section will contain one signage panel of a maximum displ y area of 7.5 square feet Allocation of these signage areas will be at the landlord's discretion. See Exhibit A" for typical placement of tenant awnings for each level. See Exhibit B' for derails ofawning materials colas and spedffcadons 2. TENANT DISPLAY SIGNAGE Space is reserved for neon or other illuminated signs to be placed behind the center glass panels at the upper level as indicated in Exhibit sA &C The landlord shall approve this sign conDrnued... P.O. Box 2688, Vail, CO 81658 • Production Center: 910 Nottingham Rd., S-2, Avon, CO 81620 Eag!e I Summit Counties: 303.949-4565 • Aspen I Glenwood Springs: 303.945-6695 FAX: 303.949-4670 S170,011cv- ign P/an .2. Tenant space by eacn or other illuminated si grouping, may have L landlord elects net to i be substituted per win IHICHTECH SIGNS VAIL 3039494670 P.01 lass 'grouping' (between column e!ements) may contain a neon i as approved by the landlord. First Floor tenants, at each glass to i 0 square feet Of such illuminated signage. In the event ;tall second floor awnings, neon or other illuminated signage may Dw grouping. Each tenant with direr doorway access to the outside of the building may place name Ind business identifcatlon signage directly upon, or behind the glass door. Additionally, business hours may alio be so displayed. 3. BUILDING ICENTIFICKIION SIGN An Internally bac'dighted (halo effect) sien for the north east comer of the building as Shown in ExhibitrA & C shall be permitted on the wall of the building. The landlord must approve 'ext and deslcg'n. A similar or Identical sin may be permitted on the exterior of the building at the southwest corner. I 4. FREE-STANDING MbNUMENT SIGNS Up to four, free-standing monument signs shall be allowed Ise-_ Erhib/tDl. Stens at the primary entrance areas will display building name plus name of adjacent building (Avon CenterSuildrngJ. Two, smaller signs shall be for directional information only. NI shall be internally illuminated. Speciflc designs shall be forthcoming in specific form for final DRB app�oval prior to Installation. Specific locations as Indicated on site plan. A four-sided kiosk shall'be constructed and located as shown in ErhlSitD. This fixture will be Illuminated intemaljy and externally. Display area will be allocated by the landlord for use by the commercial; tenants. 5. PACKING LOT SIGNS The landlord reserves t} e right to place Individual signs, not to exceed 12' x 18' each in size and conforming to standard parking information configurations, for each parking space for the purpose Pf reguladng usage of parking facilities. These signs will Indude required 'handicapped' zoning. There mll be no reserved parking other than 'Handicapped Parking' 6. CCLORS. LOGOS ard iYFOGVPHY Awnings, where used, shall be consistent throughout and of a Burgundy color as shown in Exhibu Bfor display en the first Aoor. Second floor awnings, If used, will be exclusively throughout second floor of either matching Burgundy or Forest Green color asshc-vM /n Exhibit B Awnings and signage will be illuminated and may contain logos and/or teat within prescribed areal. Copy and logo colors shall be comps: ble with awnings and sur, cunding colors and shall be used at the discretion of the landlord. continued.. Shapiro Sign Plan .3. 7. TEMPORARY SIC -NA • Temperary sig: ,age, Ic permanent signage, c a period not to exceet rary signs may not exc the landlord and shall S. MISCELLANEOUS All the following shall 21 Building: r 1. Tenants she of tem 2. All moun8n In ccrr 3. The landicr under Exhibits Included: A Current, B. Awning C Enlargei D. Current HIGHTECH SIGNS VAIL 3039494670 P_02 !nd ying a new tenant, in the absence of, or during production of a nature and size acceptable to the landlord, shall be allowable for 30 days from the date of permanent sig:iage application. Tempo - ed 7.5 square feet Placement shall be allowed at the discretion of e fora strictly limited time frame. applicable to meat the general sign requirements of the Century be responsible for obtaining all prcper permits prior to installation Ira ry or permanent signs. components, fasteners and electric service and equipment shall be lete compliance with all applicable codes and regulations. shall have the right to approve all contractors used by the tenant its sign program. Hord's 4/color rendering d: styles, fabrics, colors building center section lord's Site Plan and monument sign drawing 5 { - t� i ,f ti is . � m OWA w»2& &y-\�;-.- }� 2 \ � � $ f � m OWA "IN .�. n I >0 f � �, � V ' r t4 41' � �� ✓ �. r l .�A V , y >0 rs 0 0 n V � Y1A 4vA ( 4 N(t it 4 I + 4 •' iti Cion , � �)S r�~ G. y a ....o,a..ao.. a `3 i to to ''1 r• t FOR ~L ® 3 1 ] 1 I I v. 77 IL t �c i I 71 �' •1.1.1 `'•>«.�!f:•'•`c''is.'j, ,•7,`; A"t I ILI n I� �c �I OF4 IL 7� W!m/.«14S'7Ze - 7 • n ,, i.�t.`•4 ��1. L%i' `6i�. �: �:a:{�� .�i; -�-��i .,it ,��t-r, .t. to P. r PLANNING ZONING COMMISSION STAFREPORT November 1, 1944 Tract N, Block 3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Upper Eagle Valley Sanitation District McIg. Re -Roof Final Design Review -Roof Material Change PROJECT TYPE: Sanitation Building ZONING: GPEH COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES INTRODUCTION: Upper Eagle Valley Sanitation is requesting a roof material change on half of their building. The existing material on the building is half cedar shake shingle and half metal roof The request is to make the entire roof metal. The metal will be etched galvanized STAFF COMMENTS: The Commission tabled this item at the October 18, 1994 meeting so that a representative would bring a sample of the roof material A representative of the Sanitation District will be present at the meeting with a sample In order to reduce glare, the proposed metal is etched gakanized Further. the architectural style of the building lends itself to a metal roof STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Commission approves this application with the Ibllowing condition The existing and new metal roof have an etched or acid wash treatment to reduce glare RECOMMENDED ACTION: I Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Mary Holden Town Planner iwk PLANNINL .%ND ZONING COMMISSION STArr REPORT November 1, 1994 Tract N, Block 3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Upper Eagle Valley Sanitation District Bldg. Re -Roof Final Design Review -Roof Material Change PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied (� Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date 140Sue Railton, Secretary The Commission denied approval. 0% PLANNING mND ZONING COMMISSION STAFr REPORT November 1, 1994 Lot 3, Block 3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Westgate Building Final Design Review --Master Sign Program PROJECT TYPE: Master Sign Program ZONIING: TC COMPLIES WITH ZONING' Yes INTRODUCTION Westgate received approval of their Master Sign Program on October 4, 1994 with conditions of approval. One condition was the landscape plan for the monument sign be brought back for approval. STAFF COMMENTS The landscape plan is attached to the report STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff would recommend the following condition of approval I The sign may not be placed within the site triangle, and the exact location must be approved by Staff prior to placement RECOMMENDED ACTION: I Introduce Application 2 Applicant Presentation 3 Commission Review 4 Commission Action Respectfully Submitted Mary Holden Town Planner 0% ."°, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STArr REPORT November 1, 1994 Lot 3, Block 3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Westgate Building Final Design Review -Master Sign Program PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions (4 Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date/40/ Sue Railton, Secretary _"Cae )e -e The _Commission approved with the following conditions: 1. The sign may not be placed within the site triangle, and the exact location must be approved by staff prior to placement; 2. The addition of two five gallon pointilla on both ends of the Westgate monument sign; -- 3. gLL4ai.nt.illa mus-Lbe five _gallon- E2 DATE: October 18, 1994 TO: Mary Holden Town of Avon Plantung FROM: Larry Ast(�% RE: Westgate el;" nter Please find attached the landscape plan requested by the Design Review Board for the monument sign at the Westgate Center. In addition, a review of the site with grading further along, shows that the top of the sign, as proposed, would be below the grade of the highway, and therefore difficult to read. We are requesting that the sign berm and rock be modified to permit the top of the sign to be 5' above highway grade. This will permit the sign to be readable with a berm of snow along the curb. HIGHTECHSIGNS P O. Box 2688 Production Center Vail, CO 81658 910 Nottingham Road 303.949.4565 Suite S.2 FAX: 9494670 Aeon, CO 81620 Aspen & Glenwood Sprgs 303.9♦ 5,6095 �� 1 Thy p SOS ` -Z11 _.4 _O M a ,.��• _„ OCT' -18—'9A TU ';:06 Ill: ULlVttc �wuco, --. --'- 10;. M N "A_ 4. f4tb1CLL eUC?`Ne act os� owes r .ria monroe & Newell E Wneen. Inc. ?.0. Box 1687 &1" 0049 E Bearer Creek Blyd.. 8 62 ,��I . M� Avon. Mw%L.Colorado 8 1620 19051 949-778a f•�ec�m er_, CIATE FAX (50019{9-40ft i , e 1 t , , i • x.21-0 GTaY .1.4tceJ-o: -- Cn 41 A AF V 1°ro-or, , 1 r± 4WLA;� , i _�.._.T . 7.._ , x.21-0 cp • 's:4t� 11 TOTAL P.H2 Planning anti Zoning Commission Staff Report November 1, 1994 T. J. Connor Building Site Plan Modifications Lot 14-15, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek I ROJECT TYPE: Industrial/Commercial ZONING: IC COMPLIES WITH ZONING? Yes, But Not DRB Plans P (STORY Five revised site plans purporting to address concerns regarding discrepancies between approved plans and construction of this project have been submitted to this office within the past month . None of these five site plans have adequately addressed the major concerns raised. The main concern is the north driveway grade, which has increased from 8% to approximately 12%. At the October 18, 1994 Planning and Zoning meeting, the Commission reviewed an application for modifications to this project. The requested modifications included the replacement of a double retaining wall between the upper and lower parking lots with a single 16 foot high retaining wall, elimination of a retaining wall, and the addition of retaining wall surface treatment t4 proval was given for the replacement of the double retaining wall in the rear with one retaining wall in the rear and all other moditications were denied The Commission requester' the applicant, T J Conner, submit plans reflecting the actual construction taking place on site for the Commission's review and approval at the November I, 1994 meeting STAFF COMMENTS The most recent set of plans reviewed by Staff indicate substantial modifications to the site, which were not part of the original approval Listed below are the modifications. • Grades shown for the driveway areas scale from 9-121o, even though tl,e note indicates 8 4%, • Inside curve radius in drivewav has been reduced to five feet, • Design detail !rave not been provided for revised drainage patterns; • Trash dumpster locations render parking spaces unusable, thereby, creating non- compliance with approval for the project, • Detail on retaining wall and guardrail must be submitted, and A Finished grades exceed 2 1 The north driveway grade is of major concern and there are only two apparent methods of obtaining the approved 8 446 grade One method is to lower the parking lot grade at the rear or the building and revise the building elevations, and floor plan accordingly The 004 e00) Planning anu Zoning Commission Staff Report November 1, 1994 T. J. Connor Building Site Plan Modifications Lot 14-15, Block t, Benchmark at Beaver Cree_: other method is to lengthen the driveway by removing the retaining wall and reconstruction per original approved plans. There are no plans on file with our office indicating what is being constructed and how an 8.4"o grade will be achieved. It appears the plans issued for a building permit have not been foil )wed. The various revised plans have shown the building raised feet, unacceptable drainage flew patterns, inadequate drainage treatment, driveway grades exceeding 8'%, non-functional trash dumpster locations and finished slopes exceeding 11. The app:icant must submit a complete set of accurate construction plans for review and zpproval by the Town of Avon. Construction will not be allowed to continue on this project until such time as revised plans reflecting what will be built is submitted for review and is approved by the Planning and Zoning commission. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission deny all modifications submitted to date. RECOMMENDED ACTION Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully Submitted, Mary Holden Town Planner Planning anu Zoning Commission Staff Report November 1. 1994 T. J. Connor Building Site Plan Modifications Lot 14-15, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued (/j Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual. No Action ( ) Date il260 ��Sue Railton, Secretary The Commission tabled to discuss at a later date. 00% PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAbr REPORT November 1. 1994 Lot 63, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Seasons at Avon Final Design Review - Modifications PROJECT TYPE: Commercial Building ZONING: TC -Town Center COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES INTRODUCTION: Stephen Elken, on behalf of Avon Partners 11, has submitted an application requesting Design Review Board approval for the elimination of the chimney caps, the cupolas over the four towers on the north elevation, and the stucco boning on the columns of the south porte cochere. These architectural elements were approved in December of 1993. STAFF COMMENTS: These elements appear to add architectural detail to the structure. The memorandum to the Design Review Board, dated October 19, 1994, states "light poles at the drives that match the theme `seasons"' have been approved. Staff would like to comment that the lights have not been approved and the only lights approved are those indicated in the Streetscape improvements. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommendation is for the Commission to look at the structure, which does not have the architectural elements, and assess whether or not the elimination of the elements are appropriate. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4 Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Mary Hold4 Town Planner PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAIrr REPORT November 1, 1994 Lot 63, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Seasons at Avon Final Design Review - Modirications PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date p Sue Railton, Secretary ✓d �`� �—�`�` The Commission partially approved approving the following. 1. Elimination of the chimney caps; 2. The stucco boxing on the columns of the columns of the south porte cochere; 3. The cupolas over the four towers on the north elevation withheld pending a site review. A MEMORANDUM TO: Town of Avon, Design Review Board FROM: Avon Partners II, Stephen F. Elken DATE: October 19, 1994 RE: Seasons at Avon Please be advised that we have eliminated the following items from the above mentioned project: 1. The arches over the fireplace stacks at the top level roof fine. 2. The cupolas over the four towers at the North side. 3. Eliminate the stucco "boxing" of the lower few feet of the porte-cochere support columns at the south drive. As you are aware we have also added additional items to the exterior and site which have beevsand installed (i_e. jL1CL��Sedlaadscap;ng phe south concrete wail, t oles atd the drives which match the theme "season sidewalks along Benchmark oad, and o additions were installed.t6 enhance the buildings ifnage and improve public access and enjoyment. Atm. Pi 0 E G- 8- `J jii��E n �1T�I111711,R11VI'I fllUil Aw +� OG 1 J\ MfR i� I 0 F „�,y TuGGo r _ .O.�o/�•E� I � � "isr. uAS A G�fNar TDA I I0X/pl' R,.rr..Aar %JiB7".t�:1Q7Gf of/E�� .4 � I r � I I .4 � I r PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAI!lREPORT November 1, 1994 Lot 28, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Orcutt Duplex Final Design Review -- Site Modification PROJECT TYPE: Duplex ZONING: PLTD, Duplex COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES INTRODUCTION John Orcutt received Final Design Review Approval for his duplex on April 20, 1993. He has submitted an appl;cation requesting approval of a revised grading plan. Attached to the report is the originally approved grading plan and the proposed grading plan. STAFF COMMENTS The Design Review Rules, Regulations and Procedures state, 1provements should be designed to conform with existing site topography t minimi._ squired grading and effect on adjacent properties. All grading shall be within the property boundaries." The proposed grading plan indicates site disturbance from lot line to lot line and in certain instances, on the adjacent property. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommendation is for denial of this request based on non-conformance with Section 6.22. E. Sive Grading., of the Design Rules, Regulations and Procedures. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4 Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Mary Holden Town Planner Poi --- PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STA► ; REPORT November 1, 1994 Lot 28, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Orcutt Duplex Final Design Review — Site Modification PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted (✓f Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn (/ !)q Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date 1 / r t _Sue Railton, Secretary 15K1611 YJ A�- e01 I V,�Ie - 2v� A PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAT REPORT November 1, 1994 Lot A, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Lodge at Avon Center Final Design Review -Site Modification PROJECT TYPE: Mixed Use ZONING: TC COMPLIES WITH ZGNING? Yes "L 41Z1]]II4111[I)Ll Bob Roman, on behalf of the Home Owners Association, is requesting removal of the stairs leading from the western parking areas to the structure. This area would be landscaped with sod. Currently they are in disrepair. STAFF COMMENTS The Design Rules, Regulations and Procedures state in Section 6.22. 1. Sidewalks. I. Sidewalks or walkways should be provided as necessary for efficient pedestrian circulation within the project and with neighboring properties; 2. Walkway locations should be separated from vehicular traffic where possible, 3. Walkways should be constructed of attractive durable materials such as decorative concrete or brick pavers; 4. Walkway widths should be compatible with anticipated uses. Required minimum walkway widths will be at the discretion of the Planning and Zoning Commission. The removal of the stairway would not promote efficient pedestrian circulation on the site. Pedestrian movement would be mixed with the vehicular movement, which is discouraged. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Commission deny this request based on non-conformance with Section 6.22. 1. Sidewalks of the Design Rules, Regulations and Procedures. RECOMMENDE D ACTION: 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SPA► .• REPORT November 1, 1994 Lot A, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Lodge at Avon Center Final Design Review -Site Modification Respectfully Submitted Mary Holden Town Planner PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued (✓j Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date /490/ /qq� Sue Railton, Secretary i 7 — The Commission tabled due to the lack of representation from the applicant. y� N I' mi r w < a r �jC. ire L77: t� PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAt. REPORT November 1, 1994 Lot 22, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Intermountain Engineering Final Design Review - Site Modifications PROJECT TYPE: Office ZONING: IC COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES INTRODUCTION: Jeff Spanel ':as submitted an application requesting approval for the placement of a "Tuff Shed" on the southwestern portion of the site. The shed would be located 7.5' from the side yard property line. STAFF COMMENT'S: In 1983, approval of a Special Review Use was given for an outdoor storage area for Franzen Construction. The SRU was valid until June 30, '1985, due to concern over negative impact on future, adjacent development. There appears to be no negative impact from the placement of the tuff shed. Accessory buildings are allowed in every zone district subject to the following criteria "A An accessory building is defined as a subordinate building, t.ie use of which is customarily inciden+al to that of the principal building or to principal use of the land and which is located on the same lot or parcel with the principal building or use. Accessory buildings shall not be provided with kitchen or bath facilities sufficient to render them suitable for permanent residential occupancy. Approval of the Planning and Zon ng Commission and a building permit is required." The Design Rules, Regulations and Procedures state, "Temporary structures including excavated basements, construction storage and office trailers, and tents shall not be allowed except as may be determined to be necessary during construction." The Zoning Code defines a building as "any permanent structure built for the shelter or enclosure of persons, animals, chattels, or property of any kind, and does no include advertising signboards or fences " STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Commission approve the application with the following condition: I . A landscape plan accompany the shed placement, to be approved by Staff 2 The shed be painted to match the main structure PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAR: REPORT November 1. 1994 Lot 22, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Intermountain Engineering Final Design Review - Site Modifications 1. Introduce Application. 2. Applicant Presentation .i. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Mary Holden Town Planner RECOMMENDED ACTION: PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued (—f Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date /iLeU� /9 f� Sue Railton, Secretary 'A r"�`�"`� -.-Ih.eCom fission tabled, due to the lack of representation from the applicant. 1,„ lulJl ppI 1�p t � N � p WO \ \\\\\ \\\ g f V 37V,913W Fli \ 6W \ \\\\\ \\\ \\W,�p� O �� Fli ic TUFF SHED, INC. 201 Rio Grande Blvd. Denver CO. 80223 MDenver. CO ■ Colorado Springs, CO e Salt Lake City. UT • Sacramento. CA e Phoenix, AZ Las Vegas, NV • Albuquerque, NM • San Jose, CA. ag 8 a w w ON N o x x tH N o• 8 � CN 0 0 LO A N f V) 0 Ln cog N N w I. a a 0 8 0 0 N M M M N v 4 Santa Fe Ll U O J Nalamath CO LL.LL Wo = pe v z p o E t�c t7, 5 I"' S) Ouge U cmMo ti c o a �? > 3 CD a i m - = O d r E C (~ V7 N O mo ig El a� $ N O O O O w �� °Cy' r is o O�U f1.N N00]� oN �N w? 3 5] F -Ga o a 3 rn o a6 0 �+ O w 0 m Z. r O y a) [ ao'bl ro�g� as �GO'O o0 m H Na 01 0t:3 N Q H Q LO U 'M a) UURig o�N yyy y��w"�c�s C:r -0N �], w. M 1.1 iS rr ° � In � Q. adbyy,v oul ((UAb N ... 1-' > a LO LO 0 O LO Cl 0 O LO N to Cl LO N 0 10 n LO O M N O LO M C nO N n LO Lo O �.�p, P 00 d' C C N N N M MV' oU d OF: : : 1: (Do quad �7 LO N O Ln LO C� Co C, 0 O CO N 0 LO 0 O LO N 0 0t\ LO O O LO N O N LO t\ co to N Cl)C 0 O C, 0 O LO N0 ' O 00 vi 1S Cn" N C� C� CO P0 O �--' NT Lo Cl) C Cl U O N o N ri N N LO N U') NS O O O LO N O LO LO C� o O LO CI- LO N LO N LO C, LO N O O LO N Lo C, a o o.b O •o C\ M P co P O N M ,--� N L •O O O O dT oo , p b 10 a O N ..+ N N N M M O co O cli c0 O O cq C13Cl)oop Iwo .q 8 r 'o •o 'o co o 0 O O O O O 1 d n PLANNINCAND ZONING COMMISS[ON STAFr REPORT November 1, 1994 Lot 4, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Golden Eagle Service Center Final Design Review - Site Modifications PROJECT TYPE: Automobile Service Center ZONING: NC COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES INTRODUCTION: Ron Bifani has submitted an application requesting approval for the conversion of the two proposed wa-,h bays on the south end into service bays. STAFF COMMENTS: Golden Eagle Service Center received approval of a Special Review Use on April 20, 1993, to operate a service center. The approval allowed the use, with no size limitations on the service center. The applicant is requesting approval to eliminate the automatic wash bays and construct them as service bays. The exterior of the two additional bays will be the same as originally approved, with the exception of overhead doors being added. The doors, materials and color will match the existing structure The existing site plan, with the conversion of the wash bays, complies with the parking regulatiocs However, the applicant has shown additional parking. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staffrecommends the following conditions, should Commission approve the application. I All the parking must be striped RECOMMENDED ACTION: I Introduce Application 2 Applicant Presentation 3 Commission Review 4 Commission Action PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAF. REPORT November 1, 1994 Lot 4, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Golden Eagle Service Center Final Design Review - Site Modifications Respectfully submitted, Mary Holden Town Planner PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Apr-oved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued (, } Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptua, No Action ( ) JA -Sue Railton, Secretary The Commission tabled due to the lack of representation from the _ applicant. =N 1` < O« J m < LL � I I } J (r� CL C F • i � � i O 1 O < ,i ul I C9 � cn =N 1` < O« J m < LL � I I } J (r� CL C F c PLANNING4A'ND ZONING COMMISSION STA REPORT November I, 1494 Lot 24, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision Ray -Canton Duplex Final Design Review - Temporary Fuel Tank :Storage PROJECT TYPE: Residential ZONING: PUD COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES INTRODUCTION: Buz Reynolds Jr. has submitted an application requesting approval for placement of a 300 gallon diesel fuel tank for 6 months on Lot 24, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision. STAFF COMMENTS: The Design Review Rules, Regulations and Procedures stipulates, in Section 6.24, D. l., "Oil, gasoline or liquid petroleum gas tanks will not normally be permitted on or aboveground. Temporary installations for a period not exceeding 2. years may be approved provided the installation complies with all applicable regulations and is fully screened from view form all public right-of-ways and neighboring properties." The applicant must comply with all applicable Fire Codes and receive Fire Department approval for the placement of the tank. As of this date, the Fire Department has not given approval for the placement of this tank. The type of screening has not been indicated other than a 16" earth dam. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff would recommend the Commission deny or table the request until adequate information has been provided to Staff. RECOMMLNDED ACTION: I Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3 Commission Review 4 Commission Action �' PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STA � EPORT November 1, 1994 Lot 24, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision Ray -Canton Duplex Final Design Review - Temporary Fuel Tank Storage Respectfully submitted, l I�''' \ Mary Holden Town Planner PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued (-"� Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date 4ia<J /99f - Sue Railton, Secretary_ The Commission tabled at the request of the applicant.