No preview available
PZC Packet 101894PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION October 18, 1994 Tract C, Block 1, Wildridge Wildridge Sign Final Design Review -Sign PROJECT TYPE: Entry Sign ZONING: PUD COMPLIES WITH ZONING" YES INTRODUCTION: The Town of Avon has made application for the placement of an entry sign on the pump station at the entrance to Wildridge Subdivision. Attached to the report is a description of the letters and an elevation of placement. STAFF COMMENTS: "Sian Guidelines" and review criteria from the Si nor Code Section 1528 060 Sign Design Guidelines A Harmonious with Town Scale. Sign location, configuration, design, materials, and colors should be harmonious with the existing signs on the structure, with the neighborhood, and with the townscape. B. Harmonious with Building Scale. The sign should be harmonious with the building scale, and should not visually dominate the structure to which it belongs or call undue attention to itself. C Materials Quality sign materials, including anodized metal, routed or sandblasted wood, such as rough cedar or redwood; interior -lit, individual plexiglass - faced letters, or three dimensiona! individual !etters with or without indirect !ighting, are encouraged Sign materials, such as printed plywood, interio--lit box -type plastic, and paper or vinyl stick -on window signs are discouraged, but may be approved, however, if determined appropriate to the location, at the sole discretion of the Commissit n D, Architectural Harmony The sign and its supporting structure should be in harmony architecturally, and in harmony in color with the surrounding structures E. Landscaping Landscaping is required for all free-standing signs, and should be designed to enhance the signage and surrounding building landscaping F Reflecti . _ Surfaces Reflective surfaces are not allowed -N PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION October 18, 1994 Tract C, Black 1, Wildridge Wildridge Sign Final Design Review -Sign G. Lic.hting. Lighting should be of no greater wattage than is necessary to make the sign visible at night, and should not reflect unnecessarily onto adjacent properties. Lighting sour:es, except neon tubing, should not be directly visible to passing pedestrians or vehicles, and should be concealed in such a manner that direct light does not shine in a disturbing manner. H. I ocation. On multi -story buildings, individual business signs shall generally be limited to the ground level. Section 15 28 070 - Sign Design Review Criteria In addition to the sign Design Guidelines listed above, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall also consider the following criteria while reviewing proposed sign designs: A. The suitability of the improvement, including materials, with which the sign is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located: Comment: The sign material is consistent with the vicinity. B. The natrre of adjacent and neighboring improvements: Comment: The sign is compatible with adjacent and neighboring improvements. C. The qr, ality of the materials to be utilized in any proposed improvement: Comment: The quality of the proposed sign material is acceptable. D. The visual impact of any proposed improvement as viewed from any adjacent or neighboring property: Comment: The visual impact of the proposed sign will be consistent with existing area signs. E. The objective that no improvement will be so similar or dissimilar to other sign, in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic , will be impaired: Comment: The proposed sign meets this design criteria. F. Whether the type height, size, and/or quantity of signs generally complies with the sign code and appear to be appropriate for the project: r, PLANNING AAD ZONING COMMISSION October 18, 1994 Tract C, Block 1, Wildridge Wildridge Sign Final Design Review -Sign Comment: The type, size and location of the proposed sign complies with the Sign Code. G. Whether the sign is primarily oriented to vehicular or pedestrian traffic, and whether the sign is appropriate for the determined orientation. Comment: The sign is primarily oriented toward vehicular traffic. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff ecommends the Commission approve this application as presented. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Introduce. Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Mary Holden Town Planner PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION October 18, 1994 Tract C, Block 1, Wildridge Wildridge Sign Final Design Review -Sign PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied (/f Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) p Date c✓/8 Sue Railton, Secretary The Commission denied Final Design Review entry sign `V v :. br c 1vt `V v :. br 1-_ = W E D 1 =: 0 H 1 C H T E- H SIC IGNS September 1, 1993 Mr. Norm Wood Town of Avon ,4von, CO 81520 P R O P O S A L DESCRIPTION T..,.%n of Avon Puilding in Wildridge. Development and installation of building signage -"Welcome to WILDRIDGE" BEST:Application of V2" Flat Cut -Out Aluminum k letters with Satin Bronze finish, mounted on studs, offset from wall. Ail letters and installation 32,"008.07 VERY GOOD. Application of 1/2" PVC plastic letters, painted in Metallic Bronze finish, mounted on stud::, offset from wall. All letters and instaliation $1,169.90 GOOD: Application of thermoformed (1" to 1,25" deep) plastic letters, finished in matte Duranodic Bronze, mounted on studs, offset from wall. All letters and installation $ 912-95 GETTFIEJOBDONE: An attractive wood sign with frame, approximately 3' or 4' high by 8' wide with paint, and vinyl copy applied and installed. Designed to suit and installed $ 600.00 /i By Alar, k5rors HIGHTECW4,t•.5 ?.: 5: 1C re PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF Rr:PORT October 18, 1994 Lot 24, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision Bishop Residence Final Design Review Modification of Color PROJECT TYPE: Single Family Residence ZONING: PUD COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES INTRODUCTION: Michael Sanner has submitted an application for revised paint scheme on a single family residence currently under construction. STAFF COMMENTS The original application indicating the approved color scheme is attached to this report. In addition, the application indicating the proposed color scheme is attached. Color samples will be provided at the meeting. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff has no recommendation. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Mary Holden Town Planner PLANNING ANO ZONING COMMISSION STAFF Rr.PORT October 18, 1994 Lot 24, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision Bishop Residence Final Design Review Modification of Color PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted (v) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ee( ) Conceptual, No Action t ) Date /8 /�Wue Railton, Secretary Approved as submitted .wML UP_ PRUJLI I LEGAL-_DESCrIPT 10 TT ----i-- STREET ADDRESS: DESCRIPTION OF PROJE-LT: y �,�f-4,a r-� The following Information is required for submittal by the applicant to the Design Reviyw Board before a final approval can be liven; A. BUILDIN(; MATERIALS: TYPE OF MATERIAL Roof Siding V - Other Hall Materials / ` Fascia Soffits Windows Window Trim Doors Door Trim Hand or Deck Rams Flues Flashings Chimneys Trash Enclosures Greenhouses Other 3. LANOSCAPIAG: game of Jesigner: phone: COLOR (ov f%y LQ5j5�w �%z iKfS GL/MiIC '� > 7--) PF 121 PLA14T MATERIALS: Botanical Name Common Name Quanity PROPOSED TREES EXISTING TREES TO BE RE,MOvE0 Size- \ 'Indicate Caliper for deci•IuCinuS tr"S . ne•lnt 'nr con''g+5, l Iver) LC I -UvM OL. .KIPTIC ULOCK3I ILyyl t��tx�_ STREET ADDRESS: DESCRIPTION OF PR The following information is required for submittal by the applicant to the Design Review Board before a final approval can be Fiven: A. BUILDING MATERIALS: TYPE OF MATERIAL COLOR Roof 320" � l,-oilkl- W1t<rk*,E0 U�!� Siding cot A.1Sx-� figw�0.�f �c2' ttLiErk Other Wall Materials Fascia Soffits Windows Window Trim Doors Door Trim Hand ,r Deck Rails Flues Flashings Chimneys �SjJGGO T{�IPcu Tai P'41V V0 Trash Enclosures Greenhouses Other 3. LANDSCAP CIG: Name of ]esigner: phone: -- PLANT MATERIALS: Botanical Name Common Yame Quanity Size* PROPOSED TREES �S I�2�'Co Z7Z11 EXISTING 'REES TOc���f(y�'O�' BE REMOVE] 'Indicate caliper For deciduclnus trees. Ind' -'jt, netlnt am 77n•�e t)ver) M6Ca� 11110 1■111111111 - PLANNING AM) ZONING COMMISSION STAFF R ?ORT mini October 18, 1994 0 Tract G, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Aquatic Center Placement of Propane Tank PROJECT TYPE: Aquatic Center ZONING: GPEH COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES INTRODUCTION: Application has been made to place a 250 gallon propane tank on the construction site of the Aquatic Center. It will be surrounded by a 5' chain link fence, which is within the site construction fence. STAFF COMMENTS The tank will be used for heating the construction site during the winter month: Fire Department has given their approval concerning applicable Fire Codes. The screening of the tank is by the construction trails, a rock and the construction fencing. This appears to be an adequate screening and buffering from the general public. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval with the following condition: 1. The propane tank be removed from the site by June 1, 1995. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Mary Holden Town Planner • PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF LiPORT October 18, 1994 Tract G, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Aquatic Center Placement of Propane Tank PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted (--� Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) p Date -ZW94 Sue Railton, Secretary/� Approved as submitted • all am I I 1 i 1 % �Q:w -- - PkFST P,4JF,: "1 7° `f \ c r-FCCF 11,2 i' C14 4k '- 106 x g11 Ac °� , k arca-2 :\a7vPf�7�l//IH-,./ C tp O / x PAN/ J11- 40.0 x s KFC � � � x i �� a�i' Ur0 �ry . , ^�� . 9a ♦ i r 6+0 - :,EF. L4•✓F�C4-f fL4V 0/ j: �0y; I i,L4 ENTRA•:,,E ,-E.,i,v teary. w / Ij,r J q i1 , ;r.O' �r.5 _. �\ f • v. / �Li�iG. ..LLLC3' rIIY'" I L-� e i�\ QZ 0 Cis X PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF IIEPORT W October 18, 1994 a Lot 86, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision Hale Duplex Variance - Front Yard Setback PROJECT TYPE: Duplex ZONING: PUD COMPLIES WITH ZONING" No, Requires a Variance :o Front Yard Setback Requirements This is a Public Hearing for a variance to the front yard setback on Lot 86, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision. INTRODUCTION: Diana Hale has requested the application be withdrawn. We have not received a formal request at the time of writing this report. Further, adequate information was not submitted to act on the request. STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND FINDINGS: Staff recommendation is for denial of Resolution No. 94-24, A Resolution Approving a Variance From The Front Yard Setback Requirements As Stipulat-d in Title 17 of the Avon Municipal Code for Lot 86, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, Town of Avon, Eagle County, Colorado. 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Open Public Hearing 4. Close Public Hearing 5. Commission Review 6. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Mary Holden Town Planner RECOMMENDED ACTION: N. � ?"*� NNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF kr.PORT %ober I8, 1994 Lot 86, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision Hale Duplex Variance - Front Yard Setback PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modificd conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn (4 Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date41?/8 : _Sue Railton, Secretary r e 1`2a4C� The Commission approved .n � .. for a front yard setback, citing the findings as follows: A. That the granting of the variance will constitute a grant of SPOGiAl Privilege cistent its, the properties in the vicinity. B. That the granting of the variance will be detrimental to the publi,-, health, saftey, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or i;iprovments in the vicinity. C. That the variance is not warranted for one or more of the fullowing reasons: iii. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would not deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyea by the owners of other properties in the vicinity. • M r''ti T TOWN OF .AVON PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 94 - 24 SERIES OF 1994 A RESOLUTION DENYING A VARIANCE FROM THE FRONT YARD SETBACK REQUIREMENTS AS STIPULATED IN TITLE 17 OF THE AVON MUNICIPAL CODE, FOR LOT 86, BLOCK 4, WILDRIDGE SUBDIVISION, TOWN OF AVON, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO WI1EREAS, Diana l lale, developer ol'Lot 86, 131ock 4, Wildric ge Subdivision has applied for a setback variance from the "Front Yard Building Setback" requirements as stipulated in Title 17, of the Avon Municipal Code; and WI JEREAS, a public hearing has been held by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon, pursuant to notices required by law, at which time the applicant and the public were given an ,opportunity to express their opinions and present certain information and reports regarding the proposed Front Yard Building Setback Variance application; and WIIERLAS, 'ollowing said public healing, the Planning and 'Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon has d-terminew I. The variance is nc! necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity. 2 Approwd of the variance will constitute a grant of special privilege, and 3. t uv: requested variance will have detrimental effect on light and air, distriLution of population, transportation and traffic facilities, and publiz facilities and utilities, and public safety, and wxv�= SERIES OF 1994 A RESOLUTION DENYING A VARIANCE FROM THE FRONT YARD SETBACK REQUIREMENTS AS STIPULATED IN TITLE 17 OF THE AVON MUNICIPAL CODE, FOR LOT 86, BLOCK 4, WILDRIDGE SUBDIVISION, TOWN OF AVON, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO WHEREAS, Diana I laic, developer of Lot 86, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision has applied for a setback variance from the "Front Yard Building Setback" requirements as stipulated in Title 17, of the Avon Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, a public hearing has been held by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon, pursuant to notices required by law, at which time the applicant and the public were given an opoortunity to express their opinio- and present certain information and reports regarding the proposed Front Yard Building Setback Variance application; and WHEREAS, following said public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the ']'own of Avon has determine,t: 1. The variance is not necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity. 2. App. oval of the variance will constitute a grant of special privilege; and 3. The requested variance will have detrimental rffect on light and air, distribution ofpopulati— transportation and traffic facilities, and public lacililies and utilities, and public safety, and WIiEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds A. That the granting of the variance will constitute a brant of' special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties in the vicinity. B. That the granting of the variance will be detrimental to the public hezlth, Safety, or welfare, or materiafly injurious to properti. s or improvements in the vicinity. C. That the variance is not warranted for one or more of the following reasons: iii. The strict or literal interpretatk i;. and enforcement of the snec,ficd regulation would not deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the vicinity. NOW, THFREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning and Zoning Commission of the 'I awn of Avon, Colorado,, hereby denies a setback variance from the "Front Yard building Setback" requirement offitle 17 of the Aeon Municipal Code for Lot 86, Block 4 Wildridge Subdivision, Town of Avon, Eagle County Colorado. ADOPTED I ills DAY OF Secretary Chairman 1994 iii. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would not deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the vicinity. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon, Colorado, hereby denies a setback variance from the 'Front Yard Building Setback" requirement of Title 17 of the Avon Municipal Code for Lot 86, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, Town of Avon, Eagle County Colorado. ADOPTED THIS DAY OF 1994 Secretary Chairman TOWN OF AVON PLANNING AND ZONING COMIMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 94 - 23 SERIES OF 1994 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SPECIAL REVIEW USE TO ALLOW FOR A HOME OCCUPATION FOR UNIT 103, BUILDING K, SUNRIUGE, PHASE 11, LOT I, BLOCK 3 BENCHMARK AT BEAVER CREEK, TOWN OF AVON, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO WHEREAS, John and Virginia Putnam, have filed an application with th,; Town of Avon for approval of a Special Review Use to allow for a home occupation for Unit 103, Building K, Sunridge, Phase 11, Lot I, Block 3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek, "town of Avon, Eagle County, Colorado, and, WHEREAS, this location is zoned Residential High Density, in which home occupations may be approved as a Special Review Use, and, WHEREAS, a public hearing has been held by the Planning and 'Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon, pursuant to notices required by law, 71 which time tate applicant and the public were given an opportunity to exprtss their opinions and tresent certain information and reports regarding the proposed Special Review Use, and WHEREAS, following such public hearing and consideration of such information as presented, the Planning and Znning Commission finds as follows A. The proposed use othe;wise complies with all requirements imposed by the zonirg code, and B. The proposed use is consistent with the objectives and purpose of the comprehensive plan, and A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SPECIAL REVIEW USE aw TO ALLOW FOR A HOME OCCUPATION FOR UNIT 103, BUILDING K, SUNRIDGE, PHASE 11, LOT I, BLOCK 3 BENCHMAKK AT BEAVER CREEK, TOWN OF AVON, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO [s [4ft WHEREAS, John and Virginia Putnam, have filed an application with the Town of Avon for approval of a Special Review Use to allow for a home occ,,pation for Unit 103, Building K, Sunridge, Phase 11, Lot I, Block 3, Beachmark at Beaver Creek, Town of Avon, Eagle County, Colorado, and; WHEREAS, this location is zoned Residential High Density, in which home occupations may be approved as a Special Review Use, and; WHEREAS, a public hearing has been held by the Planning .nd Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon, pursuant to notices required by law, at which time the applicant and the public weia gi%en an opportunity to express their opinions and present certain information and reports regarding die proposed Special Review Use, and WI IEREAS, following such public hearing and consideration of such information as presented, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds as follows: A The proposed use otherwise complies with all requireme:�ls imposed by the zoning code, and B The proposed use is consistent with the objectives and purposes of the comprehensive plan, and C The proposed use is designed to be compatible with the surrounding land uses and uses in the area 40 • ft J NOW, THEREFORE, BE, 1T RESOLVED, that the Planning and Zoning Commission o the Town of Avon, Colorado, hereby approves a Special Review Use of a home occupation of electronic information service business for Unit 103, Building K, Sunridge, Phase II, Lot 1, Block 3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek, Town of Avon, Eagle County, Colorado, subject to the following conditions: The home occupation, may not alter the exterior of the property of affect the residential character of the neighborhood by the placement of a sign. 2. Employees are not allowed to work on the property. 3. Foot traffic is not allowed. 4. The permit is applicable to the present occupant only and not transferable to future occupants. 5. This permit is valid for two years from the date of Planning; and Zoning Commission approval of October 18, 1994. ADOPTED THIS_DAY OF �. 1994 -� ee' Secretary q -j1, 3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek, Town of Avon, Eagle County, Colorado, subject to the following conditions: The home occupation may not alter the exterior of the property of affect the residential character of the neighborhood by the placement of a sign. 2. Employees are not allowed to work on the property. 3. Foot traffic is not allowed. 4. The permit is applicable to the present occupant only and not transferable to future occupants. 5. This permit is valid for two years from the date of Planning and "Zoning Commission approval of October 18, 1994. ADOPTED THIS DAY OF 1994 Aa� Secretary PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT October 18, 1994 Tract N„ Block 3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Upper Eagle Valley Sanitation District Bldg. Re -Roof Final Design Review -Roof Material Change PROIECT TYPE: Sanitation Building ZONING. GPEH COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES INTRODUCTION: Upper Eagle Valley Sanitation is requesting a roof material change on half of their building. The existing material on the building is half cedar shake shingle and half metal roof. The request is to make the entire roof metal. The metal will be etched galvanized. STAFF COMMENTS: In order to reduce glare, the proposed metal is etched galvanized Further, the architectural style of the building lends itself tG a metal roof. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Comm fission approves this application with the following condition The existing and new metal roof have an etched or acid wash treatment to reduce glare RECOMMENDED ACTION: I Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3 Commission Review 4 Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Mary Holden o Town Planner K PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF IthPORT October 18, 1994 Tract N, Block 3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Upper Eagle Valley Sanitation District Bldg. Re -Roof Final Design Review -Roof Material Change ?LANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date & /$ �� Sue Railton, Secretary The Commission motioned to table Final Design Review -Roof Material Change unti I app scan as pro uce same e of the C • C 1 ^. Planning and i.oning Commission Staff Report October 18, 1994 T. J. Connor Building Site Plan Modifications Lot 14-15, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek PROJECT TYPE: IndustriaUCommercial ZONING: IC COMPLIES WiTH ZONING? Yes INTRODUCTION Peter Sullivan, on behalf of T..1. Connor, has subnutted an application for site plan a,,d retaining wall modifications The originally approved site plan indicated two retaining walls on the west portion of the site. Currently, there is one proposed at approximately 16' in he'ght. The revised site plan includes significant modifications to grading and drainage. A major section of retaining wall has been deleted along the driveway at the northwest corner if the site. The retaining walls will be painted Light Stone and the "A" retaining walls will receive a stucco finish. The surface treatment of the retaining walls complies with the intent of the design guidelines. STAFF COMMENTS This project is currently heing reviewed for a preliminary condominium plat. The proposed site plan saibmitted with this application does not match the preliminary condominium plat or the original site plan that the bt:ilding permit was based on. Proposed changes in the retaining walls and grading has resulted in significant impacts including unacceptable drainage. dnveway grades increased to 121i0, plus a 16 foot vertical drop in the center of the parking lot and others listed below: I . Trash enclosure locations are not shown any more. 2. Drainage on the northwest portion of the site indicates flowing onto the driveway and down onto Metcalf Roa(i, which is not acceptable. 3. Drainage on the southeast portion of the site indicates flow onto the adjacent property, which is not acceptable. 4. Grading exceeds 2 1 slopes. 5. Detention is inadequate for drainage. 6. Driveway width has decreased to l0' from 16', which is inadequate. T A guardrail on the wall between north and south parking lots is needed. The impacts the above mentioned items are of major concern. ..NN Planning and . aning Commission Staff iwport October 18, 1994 T. J. Connor Building Site Plan Modifications Lot 14-15, Block 1, Benchmark n.t Beaver Creek STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommendation is for the Commission to approve the retaining wall surface treatment and deny the site modifications. The applicant must construct the project in accordance with the approved plans or submit revised plans for approval prior to construction. RECOMMENDED ACTION Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4 Commission Action Rspectfully Submitted, Mary Holden Town Planner Planning and —oning Commission Staff Repov t October 18, 1994 T. J. Connor Building Site Plan Modifications Lot 14-15, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions (4 Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdra.vn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) pp )ate f f Sue Railton, Secretary "fie� The Commission granted approval for T J Conner Site Modifications only for the changes to the retaining wall at the center of the building from a double wall to a single wall. bm �z \ NCOYO,R RO�!!lRfY Mtll4l�rRY�fl�.l �, A! brp � r.`nl p RVI . Wtlfll !'MlMG[ �mR !a'.Rn ru covrRq I+Iwr � r°nm.sl �1" 0 1 5 6:'.4'are -. • -_'>a ,.r 1 ` tom•.. \ y C 1 1 1 \, N6c•pa•Z 1. C 46546. N\ .1 R...W M YV !. .�.a•^re.wi •c : �•n ��� WR. YC{• I., YP. MW �1 • •Jr `t.0 lj ry. ._ ' I t -.,. _.C _. Wall Treatmamt Le end \r J Denotes a stucco finish; Light Stone color to match building facade (ref. Color Selection Guide by American Steel Building Co., Inc.) Denotes a paint finish; Light Stone color to match stucco (ref. Color Selection Guide) Refers to wall facade to receive treatment RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PLANNING .AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 4, 1994 A Town of Avon Planning and Zoning Commission Worksession was scheduled for 7:00 PM to discuss a Townwide Ordinance, however, due to the Council worksession running past 7.00 PM the discussion was postponed The regular meeting of the Town of Avon Planning and Zoning Commission was called to order by Chairman Jack Hunn at 7:30 PM, October 4, 1994 in the Council Chambers, Avon Municipal Building, 400 Benchmark Road, Avon, Colorado All members were present except for Sue Railton and Patti Dixon Members Present Jack Hunn, Henry Vest Rhoda Schneiderman, Bill Sargis, Buz Reynolds Staff Present. Norm Wood. Acting Director of Community Development Mary Holden, Town Planner, Charlette Pascuzzi, Recording Secretary CONSENT AGENDA The following items were scheduled on the Consent Agenda L Lot 4, Wildridge Acres Subdivision, Loft Addition 2 Lot 63, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Sign Program Modification 3 Lot 63, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision .nal Design Modifications 4 Approval of September 20, 1994, Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes Mary Holden described each Consent Agenda request She requested that the Commission again table Lot 4, Wildridge Acres, as she still has not received any information regarding this application She recommended approval for the other items on the Consent agenda PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES October 4, 1994 Page 2 CONSENT AGENDA. (CONT) Henry Vest moved to approve the Consent Agenda as submitted, Bill Sargis seconded and the motion carried with lack Hunn abstainim, PUBLIC HEARINGS Lot 14/15, Block 1 Benchmark at.Beaver Creek Subdivision Above Ground Electric Service Lines. Special Review Use Public Hearing Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution 94- 20 Mary Holden stated that it is apparent, from the letter received from the neighbor of this property, that an underground easement will not be _,ranted, therefore the only option is for above ground service lines She stated that Staff feels that there might be a less visible location for the power lines than the one proposed, therefore should the Commission approve this request, there is a condition that the location be approved by the Commission Staff recommendation is for denial of this request Considerable discussion followed on the possible locations for the pole Norm Wood stated that he did not think they had enough information Chairman Hunn then opened the public hearing With no public input, the Chairman then closed the public hearing Considerably more discussion followed on the possible locations Buz Reynolds mov .d to approve Resolution 94-20, A Resolution Approving A Special Review Use To Allow For Above Ground Power Lines Connecting To A Building On Lot 14/15, Block I, Benchmark At Beaver Creek Subdivision, Town of Avon, Eagle Countv, Colorado Henry Vest seconded After further discussion. Buz Reynolds amended his motion to change Condition dumber I to state the power line location be approved by Staff Henry Vest seconded the amendment and the motion carried with lack Hunn voting nay Lot 3, Block 1, Wildrid a Subdivision. Fourplex. Height Variance. Public Hearing, Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution 94-21 Mary Holden stated that since the applicants have revised the building design and it now complies with the height restrictions set forth in the Zoning Code. the height variant: is no PLAINNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES October 4., 1994 Page 3 PUBLIC HE kRINGS, (CONT) Lot 3. Blocky Wildridee Subdivision Fourplex. Hei,ht Variance Public Hearin_ and Zoning Commission Resolution 94-21 cont Planning longer needed and Staff recommends approval of Resolution 94-21 denying the height variance. Chairman Hunn then opened the public hearing and with no public input forthcoming, he then closed the public hearing Rhoda Schneiderman moved to approve Resolution 94-21, A Resolution Denying A Variance From The Building Height Requirements As Stipulated In Title 17 Of The Aeon Municipal Code. For Lot 3, Block 2, Wildridge, Town Of Avon, EaUle County Bill Sargis seconded and the motion carried unanimously. FINAL DESIGN REVIEW'S Lot 3 Block 2. Wildridee Subdivision Fourplex Final Desi n Review Mary Holden stated that the buildinmeets the 35 foot height requirements and the materials and colors are called out in the staff—report. She stated that slopes in certain areas exceed 2: L She stated that more information on the retaining walls needs to be provided A construction/erosion fence will be required and the landscape materials must meet the minimum requirements. Staff recommends approval with the conditions listed in the staff report Bob Kauffman Etated that they have changed the 6:12 8 12 roof combination to a 5 12 and introducing some window wells on the back side, verses cutting for finished grade and introducing kind of a dutch hip on the east elevation. All these changes resulted in meetmL the 35' height requirement The colors will be a natural cedar and a kind of a forest green trim Discussion followed on the colors Discussion followed on the lighting. The lighting will be down cvlmders Discussion followed on the color of the stucco for the retaining wall, and the height of the retaining wall Discussion followed on the landscaping for the retaining wall plantings Chairman Hunn stated he would like to thank the applicants for working with the Commission to get this project into compliance He asked if there would be an automatic PLANNING AND ZONING COMM'SSION MEETING MINUTES October 4, 1994 Page 4 FINAL DESIGN REVIEWS (CONT) Lot 3, Block 2. Wildridge Subdivision Fourpler Final Design R. -view (cont) irrigation system. The apolicant stated that there was not. Chairman Hunn stated that the Commission has been pretty consistent about requiring one for multi -family units. He also asked if the asphalt roofing materials would meet the 300 Ib minimum Rhoda Schneiderman moved to grant final design approval, with the following conditions' 1. The flues, flashings and vents be painted to match the color scheme of the building 2. Revegetation include native bushes 3 The landscape material meet the minimum Town of Avon standards. 4. Meters be placed on the building. 5 prior to any site disturbance, a construction/erosion control fence be placed on site 6. Slopes may not be steeper than 2:1 (2 horizontal/1 vertical). 7 All retaining walls over 4' high must be designed by an engineer 8. An automatic watering system be added and required 9. The terraced area landscape be brought back to staff with the recommendation that taller more varied trees and shrubs be put in that area to screen the wall 10 That a 300 Ib three tab architectural shingle be used 11. That solid, cylindrical down lights be substituted for the globes that are now shown on the plan. Bill Sargis seconded Chairman Hunn asked that a condition that the colors and materials be brought back to the Commission be added Rhoda Schneiderman so amended her motion, Bill Sargis seconded the amendment The motion carried unanimously PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES October 4, 1994 Page 5 FINAL DESIGN REVIEWS (CONT) Lot 3 Block 3 Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, Westgate Mastcr Sian Program Mary Holden stated that this sign program is in keeping with the sign code with the exception of two freestanding signs and the location of the freestanding sign along Beaver Creek Blvd, which is located in the setback. Freestanding signs must be located at least 10' from the property line, and only one freestanding sign is allowed Larry Ast stated that they have no problem with removing the second sign or complying with the ten foot setback. Discussion followed on there not being any signage on the second floor, except for the restaurant. Discussion followed on there being enough parking for a restaurant Discussion followed on the colors, and the lighting of the signs There will be no exposed illumination Rhoda Schneiderman moved to approve Lot 3, Block 3, final design review master sign program with the following conditions 1. Only one freestanding sign is allowed for this property Z. The freestanding sign be located at least 10' from the property line I Colors be brought back for approval. 4 Landscape plan for the monument sign be brought back for approval Bill Sargis seconded, and the motion carried unanimously Mary Holden stated that the applicants for Lot 3, Block 3, Westgate building modifications were not present yet and suggested that the Commission go on to the next item which is a conceptual design review CONCEPTCAL DESIGN REVIEW Lot 86. Block 4 Wildridae Subdivision Hale Duplex. Conceptual Design Review Buz Reynolds stepped down as a voting member of the Commission due to a conflict of interest r. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES October 4, 1994 Page 6 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW, (CONT) Lot 86, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision Hale Duplex Conceptual Design Review, (cont) Mary Holden stated that this contains two levels The lot slopes at approximately 30-40%. She stated that the colors and materials are called out in the staff report The landscape plan is called out in the staff report. A site plan has not been included for staff review As a conceptual review, staff has no recommendation Brian Hale stated that he was just wanting some comments from the Commission about what they are doing with the building and the treatments of the entrances and drive, etc He stated that it is a very steep lot and they are having a very difficult time designing a duplex for this lot. They are proposing two separate entrances to the property. Inter -Mountain has not finished the site plan yet He stated that they are proposing to bring a drive in from the west and bridging from the street and stacking the garages upon one another He stated that they have applied for a variance related to the setbacks and are scheduled for that on the 18th The reason for the requested variance is due to the slope of the lot. To be able to structurally put this building on this lot they need to set a footing within the city right-of-way and push the building as far forward as they can, which will still be maintaining approximately 25 feet off the edge of the pavement The further down the lot they go the steeper it becomes At finish grade they will be at about a'_ 5 1 slope Discussion followed on how the garages would be stacked and the materials to be used Discussion followed on the long roof line Also discussed was the matter of cutting out a shelf for the rest of the building instead of stepping the building Discussion followed on the logs to be used Discussion followed on using a truss system Mr Hale stated that the buyer would not be interested in using this system The need for some variation in the two units was suggested Discussion followed on how much fill would be needed The applicant stated that it would be about 10 or 12 feet of backfill Further discussion on this matter followed It was suggested that the applicant adhere to the 35' height requirement Discussion followed on the location of the driveway and parking and maneuvering The General consensus of the Commission is that the applicant is trying to make the lot fit the house and not the house fit the lot Considerable discussion followed on this Mary Holden stated that she and the applicant will need to meet once the site plan is complete As a conceptual design review, no action was taken at this time Buz Reynolds returned as a voting member of the Commission PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES October 4, 1994 Page 7 FINAL DIi;,SIGN REVIEWS (CONT) Lot Bloch- Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Westgate Modifications Mary Holden stated that the applicant is proposing to add a couple windows on the back side of the building Frank Navarro explained where the proposed windows would be located in the back, as requested by the tenants The restaurant also wants to add some windows on the second floor Also added, at a tenants request, is some clear story Discussion followed Rhoda Schneiderman moved to approved the proposed windows. except for the clear story Bill Sargis seconded and the motion carried unanimously OTHER BUSINESS Mary Holden stated that Jim Klein was present to discuss the plywuod siding that they are using on the Bishop residence Chairman Hunn stated that the concern, even though the applicant has done a very good job on thi. project, is that the next applicant may not be the craftsman that this one is Jim Klein stated that he is asking the Commission to keep an open mind on allowing plywood as a subsurface Considerable discussion followed on the use of T-1 1 I The Commission is concerned about this project opening a can of worms Jim Klein stated that he has used a rough sawn plywood as a subsurface area, not T- I I I Discussion followed on how the Commission will have to review any proposals that should come up in the future Buz Reynolds asked if anybody would have a problem with him bringing dirt into his back yard It is for a tennis court Discussio,; f)linwed Also discussed was the house that keels piling dirt up Mary Holden stated that it is being taken care of Jack Hunn asked about the Terry Allen house Mary Holden stated that John Dunn is still working on this matter Chairman Hunn stated that, regarding Ken Sortland's duplex, they added green trim without approval, and the garage doors are green also PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES October 4, 1994 Page 8 With no further business the meeting was adjourned at 9 i 5 PM Respectfully submitted, Charlette Pascuzzi Recording Secretary Commission Approval _ B Sargis_ S Railton R Schneideiman�� A Revnolds L" P Dixon H Vest J Hu>Fn---- �f r`. `�Y . PLANNING ANL) ZONING COMMISSION October 18, 1994 Tract C, Block 1, Wildridge Wildridge Sign Final Design Review -Sign PROJECT TYPE: Entry Sign ZONING: PUD COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES INTRODUCTION: The Town of Avon has made application for the placement of an entry sign on the pump station at the entrance to Wildridge Subdivision. Attached to the report is a description 01 the letters and an elevation of placement. STAFF COMMENTS: "Sign Guidelines" and review criteria from the Sign Code Section 15.28.060 Sign Design Guidelines A. Harmonious with Town Scale. Sign location, configuration, design, materials, and colors should be harmonious with the existing signs on the structure, with the neighborhood, and with the townscape. B. Harmonious with Building Scale. The sign should be harmonious with the building scale, and should not visually dominate the structure to which it belongs or call undue attention to itself. C. Materials. Quality sign materials, including anodized metal; routed or sandblasted wood, such as rough cedar or redwood; interior -lit, individual plexiglasE- faced letters, or three dimensional individual letters with or without indirect lighting, are encouraged. Sign materials, such as printed plywood, interior -lit box -type plastic, and paper or vinyl stick -on window signs are discouraged, but may be approved, however, if determined appropriate to the location, at the sole discretion of the Commission. D. Architectural Harmony. The sign and its supporting structure should be in harmony architecturally, and in harmony in color with the surrounding structures. E. Landscaping. Landscaping is required for all free-standing signs, and should be designed to enhance the signage and surrounding building landscaping. F. Reflective Surfaces. Reflective surfaces are not allowed. PLANNING AN ZONING COMMISSION October 18, 1994 Tract C, Block 1, Wildridge Wildridge Sign Final Design Review -Sign G. Lighting. Lighting should be of no greater wattage than is necessary to make the sign visible at night, and should not reflect unnecessarily onto adjacent properties. Lighting sources, except neon tubing, should not be directly visible to passing pedestrians or vehicles, and should be concealed in such a manner that direct light does not shine in a disturbing manner. H. Location. On multi -story buildings, individual business signs shall generally be limited to the ground level. Section 15.28.070 - Sign Design Review Criteria In addition to the sign Design Guidelines listed above, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall also consider the following criteria while reviewing proposed sign designs: A. The suitability of the improvement, including materials, with which the sign is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located: Comment. The sign material is consistent with the vicinity. B. The nature of adjacent and neighboring improvements: Comment: The sign is compatible with adjacent and neighboring improvements. C. The quality of the materials to be utilized in any proposed improvement: Comment: The quality of the proposed sign material is acceptable. D. The visual impact of any proposed improvement as viewed from any adjacent or neighboring property: Comment The visual impact of the proposed sign will be consistent with existing area signs. E. The objective that no improvement will be so similar or dissimilar to other signs in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic , will be impaired: Comment: The proposed sign meets this design criteria. F. Whether the type, height, size, and/or quantity of signs generally complies with the sign cede and appear to be appropriate for the project: PLANNING AN ZONING COMMISSION October 18, 1994 Tract C, Block 1, Wildridge Wildridge Sign Final Design teview-Sign Comment: The type, size and location of the proposed sign complies with the Sign Code. G. Whether the sign is primarily oriented to vehicular or pedestrian traffic, and whetht the sign is appropriate for the determined orientation. Comment: The sign is primarily oriented toward vehicular traffic. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Commission approve this application as presented. RECOMMENDED ACTION: I. Introduce Application 2 Applicant Presentation 3. Commissic n Review 4 Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Many Holden I own Planner PLANNING AN J ZONING COMMISSION October 18, '994 Tract C, Block l,'*Yildridge Wildridge Sign Final Design Review -Sign PLANNING AND ZONING ACTIO:_ Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied (� Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date 6✓/8 Sue Railton, Secretary.��ra; The Commission denied Final Design Review entry sign, + �•�'_. ti� ee rt` ID V e q J � k _...._: EF'' — 1—_ ._. La E Lr - c 0- R I C H T E r_ ry = I N SIGN -j September 1, 1993 Mr. Norm Wood Town of Avon Avon, CO 81620 P R O P O S A L ........................... DESCRIPTION T,.,,rn of Avon Puilding in Wildridge. Development and installation of building signage -"Welcome to WILDRIDGF' BEST: Application of V2" Flat Cut -Out Aluminum letters with Satin Bronze finish, mounted on studs, offset from .Nall. All letters and installation $2,008.07 VERY GOOD: Application of 1/2" PVC plastic letters, painted in Metallic Bronze Finish, mounted on stud:, offset from wall. All letters and installation $1,169.90 GOOD: Application of thermoformed (I" to 1.25° deep) plastic letters, finished in matte Duranodic Bronze, mounted on studs, offset from wall. All letters and installation $ 912-95 GETTEIEJOBDONE: An attractive wtw�d sign with frame, approximately 3' or 4' high by 8' wide with paint and vinyl copy applied and installed. Designed to suit and installed Alar }an:rr,s HIGHTECH`,;Gr'S ?r„1, B:, 7V III 'i!b' F 0 1 O PLANNING AT.0 ZONING COMMISSION STAFF ,.ZPORT October 18, 1994 Lot 24, Block 3, Wlldridge Subdivision Bishop Residence Final Design Review Modification of Color PROJECT TYPE: Single Family Residence ZONING: PUD COMPLIES WITH ZONING) YES INTRODUCTION: Michael Sanner has submitted an application for revised paint scheme on a single family residence currently under construction. STAFF COMMENTS The original application indicating the approved color scheme is attached to this report. In addition, the application indicating the proposed color scheme is attached. Color s 'es will be provided at the meeting. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff has no recommendation. RECOMMENDED ACTION: I Introduce Application 2 Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Mary Holden Town Planner PLANNING AfW ZONING COMMISSION STAFF ._.:PORT October 18, 1994 Lot 24, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision Bishop Residence Final Design Review Modification of Color PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted (✓) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn pp( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date 6 ra644ey IS'Iq Sue Railton, Secretary ✓ � A Approved as submitted. wIML Uf. VHHJLLI: _ LEaAC_DESCPIPTIpggy l L STREET ADDRESS: DESCRIPTION OF PRO,I =—- The following information is required for submittal by the aPPlicant to the Design Revi w Board before a final approval can be fiven: A. BUILDING MATERIALS: TYPE OF MATERIAL Roof Siding tiz! Other Nall Materials Fascia .,offits Windows Window Trim Doors Door Trim Hand or Deck Rails Flues Flashings Chimneys Trash Enclosures Greenhouses Other COLOR 0 - V '"fl P t A 1,-rr IZI Alp 3. LANOSCAPt%: Name of Designer: ,phone: PLANT MATERIALS: Botanical ,lame Common .`lame Quanity S1 ,.e` PROPOSED TREES EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED I *Indicate caliper for deciduc+rnls trees. nelint 'or ,Jn:'� t)ver l .LCT: '—LEuAL OL—KIPTIO lir 3yll t �[x� STREET ADDRESS: DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT— — The following infurmatior is required for submittal by the applicant to the Design Revi w Board before a final approval can be fiven: A. BUILDING MATERIALS: TYPE OF MATERIAL COLOR Roof a ENOW1za (12rt c1) (���pp Siding Other Nall Materials Fascia Soffits Windows Window Trim Doors Door Trim Hand or Deck Rails Flues Flashings Chimneys Trash Enclosures Greenhouses Other M1S(Ct— �If�OL( TAnifPEaI�E) �✓7000o �t�l F�GiI TP,O (rfAk 3. LANOSCAPISG: lame of ]esiiner: 4tJ- a L phone: PLANT MATERIALS: Botanical 'lame Common 'lame PROPOSED TREES EXISTING 'REFS TO BE REMOVE] puanity Sice' 15 Y" � Ali -ro 2 z -3 ) •Indicate caliper far •1eciductgns [rhes. nelinr "nr ^,)n•" t3verl PLANNING Ai, i) ZONING COMMISSION STAFF ZPORT October 18, 1994 Tract G, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Aquatic Center Placement of Propane Tank PROJECT TYPE: Aquatic Center ZONING: GPEH COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES INTRODUCTION: Application has been made to place a 250 gallon propane tank on the construction site of the Aquatic Center. It will be surrounded by a 5' chain link fence, which is within the site construction fence. STAFF COMMENTS The tank will be used for heating the construction site during the winter months. The Fire Department has given their approval concerning applicable Fire Codes. The screening of the tank is by the construction trails, a rock and the construction fencing. This appears to be an adequate screening and buffering from the generai public. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval with the following condition The propane tank be removed from the site by June I, 1()9j RECOMMENDED ACTION: I . Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Mary Ilolden Town Planner PLANNING A-0 ZONING COMMISSION STAFF ,_iPORT October 18, 1994 Tract G, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Aquatic Center Placement of Propane Tank PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted (✓� Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conaitions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) p Date1, Z8 �! Sue Railton, Secretary /�Gw Approved as submitted ' I I � I I � � I I II TflS / kFS7 P.4JFq lib 66 144 BFGW. fV / n i /• 51�g6' O// i .'F.O .dam; 71PQ 7/Cl/RB C' co PANT uNl YIr � '��• 10. 15 lu dt. 4f53 ./0. 40.0 41,9 yy��• I EF. c 4 V.;C4:•E / i 4 v 6+001, Y9bi i N ENM,j-E ✓E /n`/ b , X15 - ✓ .cam Ll EU IiW v � �j PLANNING Aiq) U ZONING COMMISSION STAFF.. —PORT October 18, 1994 Lot 86, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision Hale Duplex Variance - Front Yard Setback PROJECT TYPE: Duplex ZONING: PUD COMPLIES WITH ZONING" No, Requires a Variance to Front Yard Setback Requirements This is a Public Hearing for a variance to the front yard setback on Lot 86, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision. INTRODUCTION: Diana Hale has requested the application be withdrawn. We have not received a formal request at the time of writing this report Further, adequate information was not submitted to act on the request. STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND FINDINGS: Staff recommendation is for denial of Resolution No. 94-24, A Resolution Approving a Variance From The Front Yard Setback Requirements As Stipulated in Title 17 of the Avon Municipal Cede for Lot 86, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, Town of Avon, Eagle County, Colorado RECOMMENDED ACTION: I Introduce Application 2 Applicant Presentation 3 Open Public Hearing 4. Close Public Hearing 5. Commission Review 6. Commission Action RespectfullN submitted, Mary Holden Town Planner r PLANNING A..D ZONING COMMISSION STAFF`0�01PORT October 18, 1994 Lot 86, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision Hale Duplex Variance - Front Yard Setback PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( 4 Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date /� Sue Railton, Secretary_ ce- AtcX4:— The Commission approved ReUlution 94-24, A Resolution Denying A Varianc, for a front yard setback, citing the findings as follows: A. That the granting of the variance will constitute a grant of al Picivilpqe inconsistent with the limitations --Or properties in the vicinity, ether That the granting of the variance will be detrimental to the public health, saftey, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvments in the vicinity. C. That the variance is not warranted for one or more of the following reasons: The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would not deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the vicinity. [• 1• 40 r, TOWN OF .AVON PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 94 - 24 SERIES OF 1994 A RESOLUTION DENYING A VARIANCE FROM THE FRONT YARD SETBACK REQUIREMENTS AS STIPULATED IN TITLE 17 OF THE AVON IMUN1C IPAL CODE, FOR LOT 86, BLOCK 4, WILDRIDGE SUBDIVISION, TOWN OF AVON, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO WHEREAS, Diana Hale, developer of Lot 86, Block 4.. Wildridge Subdivision has applied for a setback variance from the "Front Yard Building Setback" requirements as stipulated in Title 17, of the Avon Municipal Code, and WHEREAS, a public hearing has been held by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon, pursuant to notices required by law, at which time the applicant and the public were given an opportunity to express their opinions and pre—rit certain information and reports regarding the proposed Front Yard Building Setback Variance application, and WHEREAS, following said public hearing, the Planning a.;d Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon has determined 1. The variance is not necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity. 2 Approval of the variance will constitute a grant of special privilege, and 3. The requested variance will have detrimental effect on light and air, distribution of population, transportation and traffic facilities, and public facilities and utilities, and public safety, and W HFR F AC the ylammne and loninv Commission finds SERIES OF '994 A RESOLUTION DENYING A VARIANCE FROM THE FRONT YARD SETBACK REQUIREMENTS AS STIPULATED IN TITLE 17 OF THE AVON MUNICIPAL CODE, FOR LOT 86, BLOCK 4, WILDRIDGF, SUBDIVISION, TOWN OF AVON, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO WHEREAS, Diana Hale, developer of Lot 86, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision has applied for a setback variance from the "Front Yard Building Setback" requirements as stipulated in Title 17, of the Avon Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, a public hearing has been held by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon, pursuant to notices required by law, at which time the applicant and the public were given an opportunity to express their opinions and present certain information and reports regarding the .-roposed Front Yard Building Setback Variance application, and WHEREAS, following said public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon has determined: I The variance is not necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity. 2 App -oval of the variance will constitute a grant of special privilege, and 3 The requested variance will have detrimental effect on light and air, distribution of population, transportation and traffic facilities, and public facilities and utilities, and public safety, and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds A That the granting of the variance will constitute a grant of [• [ft L 4 special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties in the vicinity. B. That the granting of the variance will be detrimental to the public health, Safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. C. That the variance is not warranted for one or more of the following reasons: iii. The strict or literal interpret;°:ion and enforcement of the specified regulation would not deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the vicinity. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon, Colorado, hereby denies a setback variance from the "Front Yard Building Setback" requirement of Title 17 of the Avon Municipal Code for Lot 86, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, Town of Avon, Eagle County Colorado. ADOPTED THIS DAY OF 1994 Secretary Chairman • C�] iii. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would not deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the vicinity. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon, Colorado, hereby denies a setback variance from the "Front Yard Building Setback" requirement of Title 17 of the Avon Municipal Code for Lot 86, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, Town of Avon, Eagle County Colorado. ADOPTED THIS DAY OF 1994 Secretary Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report October 18, 1994 Aspens Mobile Home Park Special Review Use Lot 1, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek PROJECT TYPE: Special Review Use -Public Hearing ZONING: RLD COMPLIES WITH ZONING? Yes, Existing Non -Conforming Use This is a Public Hearing for a Special Review Use for the creation of standards for the Aspens Mobile Home Park. INTRODUCTION Newport Pacific Capital Co. has submitted an application for the creation of standards for the placement of new mobile homes within the park. The mobile home park is an existing, non -conforming use and exempt from the Mobile Home Park provision in the Zoning Code, however, they are upgrading the standards, which requires a Special Review Use. The standards and application ale attached to this report. STAFF COMMENTS Following are the criteria, as listed in Section 17.48.040, to consider for approval of a special review use: A. Whether the proposed use otherwise complies with all requirements imposed by the zoning code, COMMENT: The proposed use otherwise complies with the requirements imposed by the Zoning Code. B. Whether the proposed use is in conformance with the town comprehensive plan, COMMENT: The proposed use conforms with the comprehensive plan. Specifically, Goal #132 which states, "Enhance the Town's role as a principal, year-round residential and commercial center in the Vail Valley." Goal #C 1 which states, "'Provide for an appropriate mix of residential dwelling unit types for both permanent residents and tourist " Goal #C2, which states "Affordable housing, both rental and owner occupied, should be made available through a combination of private and public efforts." Goal #C3, which states "Encourage the continual maintenance and upgrading of residential properties throughout the Town." C Whether the proposed use is compatible with adjacent uses Such compatibility may be expressed in appearance, architectural scale and features, site design, and the control of any adverse impacts including noise, dust, odor, lighting, traffic, safety, etc. ountainside Log Homes To Town of Avon Planning and Zoning Department Please let this letter serve as our notice to you of our intent to withdraw our application for a variance on Lot 86, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision (Noun inside Log Homes, Inc Diana L Hale, Vire President A DIVISION OF HALE DEVELOPME:N'r, INC. BOX 939, AVON, CO 81620 303-949-4424 woo ountainside Lag Homes To: Town of Avon Planning and Zoning Department Please let this letter serve as our notice to you if our intent to withdraw onr application for a variance on Lot 86, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision. Moun ainside Log Homes, Inc. 6 riQ � K G'L Duna L. Hale, Vice President A DIVISION OF HALE DEVELOPMENT, INC. BOX 939, AVON, CO 81620 303-949-4424 ountainside Log Homes To: Town of Avon Planning and Zoning Department Please let this letter serve as our notice to you of our intent to withdraw our application, for a variance on Lot 86, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision. Mou//nII�Iainside Log HH�om/�es, Inc. Duna L. Hale, Vice President A DIVISION OF HALF. DEVELOPMENT, INC. BOX 939, AVON, CO 81620 303-949-4424 10-12-1994 05:2 PM FROM 303 377 2870 0122 TO -132466 303 949 9139 P.01 .d. E3 _ X3Er.JELC3I=MEP4-K CCYRIPORAZ' = c3 FAX X12ANSM I SS- Z ON FAX NO: 11'fc DATE: October 12, 1994 T0: Planning and Zoning Commission SENDER: Marvin B. Simon NUMBER OF PAGES: COVER SHEET + FAX PHONE M 943-9139 ATTN: ns. PaScuzzi, Rec. Sec'y SUBJECT: Lot 86. Blk `f. Wildr. PAGES. IF ALL PAGES NOT RECEIVED. CALL 303-377-2870 Re: 5713 Wildridge Road E. Public hearing 10/18/sof My building permit is currently pending for my home on lot 8, above the subject lot. The undersigned is also the owner of lot 58, below the subject lot. I vigorously protest any such variance, as requested. All of us that are building on these steep lots could benefit from elimination of the 25 Foot set back. I could build my garages at the road level and still have my home set back more than 2S feet, saving 15-520,000. However, such construction shall reduce the quality and the appearance of the entire neighborhood. While we cannot totally ignore the financial advantages (to the builder owner) of such a variance, the detriment to all other owners will vastly outweigh such benefit. I will remind you that I moved my homesits when you discovered that we had inadvertently planned to build within the 7.S' side set back. This was most appropriate and strict adherance to the easements, not backs, and other rules, provides for a uniformly high quality neighborhood. I Suggest that the applicant review the driveway and garage placement of his neighbors who have built on almost identical lots without requiring such variances. Resp/ectt�ully submitted, Marvin B. Simon P. 0. BOX 2753 - AVON: COLORADO 81620-2753 - C303) 377-2870 10-12-1994 05:27PM FROM 303 377 2870 0122 TO —132466 303 949 9139 P.02 a ai 40 0 ma.v=-.2wm TOTAL P.02 Planning and mooning Commission Staff Repor, October 18, 1994 Home Occupation Special Review Use Lot 1, Block 3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek PROJECT TYPE: Special Review Use -Public Hearing ZONING: RHD COMPLIES WITH ZONING? Upon Approval of SRU This is a Public Hearing for a Special Review Use to allow for an in home occupation on Lot 1, Block 3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek. INTRODUCTION John and Virginia Putnam have submitted an application for a Special Review Use to allow for the operation of an electronic information service business out of their unit in Sunridge, Phase II. The application is attached to this report STAFF COMMENTS Following are the criteria, as listed in Section 17.48.040, to consider for approval of a special review use: A. Whether the proposed use otherwise complies with all requirements imposed by the zoning code, COMMENT: The proposed use otherwise complies with all requirements imposed by the Zoning Code B. Whether the proposed use is in conformance with the town comprehensive plan COMMENT: The proposed use conforms with the comprehensive plan. Specifically, Goal #A 1, which states "Ensure that all land uses are located in appropriate locations with appropriate controls." and Goal #132 which states, "Enhance the Town's role as a principal, year-round residential and commercial center in the Vail Valley." C. Whether the proposed use is compatible with adjacent uses. Such compatibility may be expressed in appearance, architectural scale and features, site design, and the control of any adverse impacts including noise, dust, odor, lighting, traffic, safety, etc. COMMENT: The proposed use is compatible with adjacent uses r -r Planning andt,oning Commission Staff Report October 18, 1994 Home Occupation Special Review Use Lot I, Block 3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission approve Resolution 94-23 with amendments as deemed appropriate by the Commission. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Open Public Hearing 4. Close Public Hearing S. Commission Review 6. Commission Action Respectfully Submitted, ' 'L G t Mary Holden Town Planner A61's r Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report October 18, 1994 Home Occupation Special Review Use Lot 1, Block 3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions (✓� Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn/( ) plCConceptual, No Action ( ) p Date— �Sue Railton, Secretary %�✓ following criteria included- no employees, no signs displayed- on foot traffic, and permit applicable to present occupant only and not transferable to future occupants and citing the following findings: A. The proposed use otherwise complies with all requirements imposed by the zoning code; and B. The proposed use is consistent with the objectives and purposes of the comprehensive plan; and C. The proposed use is designed to be compatible with the surrounding land uses and uses in the area. Motion was amended to included the home occupation code as specified in the Resolution. The the unde 1. P# 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Additional comments: TL ! ✓s.:,ess T o,, z'�r'r s to /aa ✓, l P- o _ iio rw C ,S vn e /[ 5 C /✓.c c 5 2l(/---1 C S /� CJs er” / !_Xe mo, /, No -) ",',s w.'// Ze -'00.5 e, e C n J✓ /rl �i[' 0 a,Y I c' / tC Y U ri /%O�P/�7. //', /V,:g I do hereby certify that the above statements are true and correct and the application is signed as an ac'rrowledgement of that fact. i am the wn "of the ove described property or authorized to act as agent for the owner. or, Applicant Address & Phone Number Dated Dat[31?y d APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL REVIEW USE undersigned hereby requests that a SPECIAL REVIEW USE be granted in accordance with terms of the Town of Avon Municipal Code. In support of this application, the rsigned states: The Special Review Use requested is: - / ec L n..C. i 271,�D /N70 S e r'!i /c c - Legal description of property: sc,,,/ge aec- /9✓o�a ��tsc_ 72 ✓ /t _ Address of property is: le 61 w, /�k Owner of described property: Sra�r 9, Applicant for Special Review Use: N�,q Zoning classification of property:„ iL_ ,=/T /f s�� ee Existing improvements on property consist of: �fi9 Duration of proposed Special Review Use is: Permanent Temporary Years a There is hereby attached a list of the names and addresses of all property owners within 300 feet of the property upon which the Special Use permit is requested. and the required notices for mailing and posting. 10. Additional comments: TL ! ✓s.:,ess T o,, z'�r'r s to /aa ✓, l P- o _ iio rw C ,S vn e /[ 5 C /✓.c c 5 2l(/---1 C S /� CJs er” / !_Xe mo, /, No -) ",',s w.'// Ze -'00.5 e, e C n J✓ /rl �i[' 0 a,Y I c' / tC Y U ri /%O�P/�7. //', /V,:g I do hereby certify that the above statements are true and correct and the application is signed as an ac'rrowledgement of that fact. i am the wn "of the ove described property or authorized to act as agent for the owner. or, Applicant Address & Phone Number Dated Dat[31?y d [REZEIVE ""Wen OCT 1-, 199 TOWN OF AVON �2f.Z Qy�aCcttz �%%fi1o2 vLQC69t, alww tr .ac C-r�� ,Bi�•z-r.4-�ac� cl IVkA G2s A4 t-4y11411�glla F 4M • X51 629 t-o� "14 U P ,� F . - n I _ � t � _ / �� / .l .��. � /' � t r • - .. j Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report October 18, 1994 Aspens Mobile Home Park Special Review Use Lot 1, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek COMMENT: The proposed use is compatible with adjacent uses in the area. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission approve Resolution 94-22 with amendments as deemed appropriate by the Commission. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Open Public Hearing 4. Close Public Hearing 5 Commission Review 6 Commission Action Respectfully Submitted, Mary Holden Town Planner W 401 -N Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report October 18, 1994 Aspens Mobile Home Park Special Review Use Lot 1, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted (✓) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date. 414' / Sue Railton, Secretary The Commission granted approval for Resolution 94-22 citing the following findings: A. The proposed use otherwise complies with all requirements imnnc.d by the zoning rndp nd B. The osed use is consistent with the o Of e comprehensive pan; an ectives and C- The proposed use is designed to be compatible with the surrounding land uses and uses in the area. -N d TOWN OF AVON PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 94 - 22 SERIES OF 1994 A RESOLUTION GRANTING A SPECIAL REVIEW USE TO ADOPT UPGRADED BUT NON -CONFORMING STANDARDS FOR THE ASPENS MOBILE HOME PARK LOT I, BLOCK 2, BENCHMARK AT BEAVER CREEK, TOWN OF AVON, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO WHEREAS, Newport Pacific Capital Co , Inc., has filed an application with the Town of Avon for approval of a Special Review Use to reduce the non -conformity of a non -conforming use and adopt upgraded but non -conforming standards for the Aspens Mobile Home Park, Lot I, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek, Town of Avon, Eagle County, Colorado, and, WHEREAS, this location is zoned Residential Low Density, in which mobile home parks may be approved as a Special Review Use, and, WHEREAS, the existing mobile home park is a non -conforming use with no adopted standards, and WHEREAS, a public hearing has been held by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the 7 owp of Avon, pursuant to notices required by law, at which time the applicant and the public were given an opportunity to express their opinions and present certain information and reports regarding the proposed Special Review Use, and WHEREAS, following such public hearing and consideration of such information as presented, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds as follows A. The proposed use otherwise complies with all requirements imposed thr rn,4n- and • C7 SERIES OF 1994 A RESOLUTION GRANTING A SPECIAL REVIEW USE TO ADOPT UPGRADED BUT NON -CONFORMING STANDARDS FOR THE ASPENS MOBILE HOME PARK LOT 1, BLOCK 2, BENCHMARK AT BEAVER CREEK, TOWN OF AVON, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO WHEREAS, Newport Pacific Capital Co., Inc., has filed an application with the Town of Avon for approval of a Special Review Use to reduce the non -conformity of a non -conforming use and adopt upgraded but non -conforming standards for the Aspens Mobile Home Park, Lot I, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek; Town of .Avon, Eagle County, Colorado, and, WHEREAS, this location is zoned Residential Low Density, in which mobile home parks may be approved as a Special Review Use, and, WHEREAS, the existing mobile hl -me park is a non -conforming use with no adopted standards, and WHEREAS, a public hearing has been held luy the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon, pursuant to notices required by law, at which time the applicant and the public were given an opportunity to express their opinions and present certain information and reports regarding the proposed Special Review Use, and WHEREAS, following such public hearing and consideration of such information as presented, the Planning and 'Zoning Commission finds as follows A. The proposed use otherwise complies with all requirements imposed by the zoning code, and B. The proposed use is consistent with the objectives and purposes of the 1 '1 comprehensive plan, and C. The proposed use is designed to be compatible with the surrounding land uses and uses in the area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE ITRESOLVED, that the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon, Cole, ado, hereby approves a Special Review Use for the upgraded but non- conlocming standards attached hereto as Exhibit A for the Aspens Mobile Home Park, Lot I, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek, Town of Avou, eagle County, Colorado. ADOPTED THIS_ 9X DAY OF Secretary C firman NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon, Colorado, hereby approves a Special Review Use for the upgraded but non- conforming standards attached hereto as Exhibit A for the Aspens Mobile Home Park, Lot I, • Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek, Town of Avon, Eagle County, Colorado. ADOPTED THIS_ 19X DAY OF 4� Secretary C iman i � I 1994 APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL REVIEW USE The undersigned hereby requests that a SPECIAL REVIEW USE be granted in accordance with the terms of the Town of Avon Municipal Code. In support of this application, the undersigned states: 1. The Special Review Use requested is: reduce the number of mobile home spaces to 93 single wides and 65 double spaces 2. Legal description of property: s L7 7 ��, Z ,�,Ajfjf, 3. Address of property is: 901 West Reaver Creek, Avon Co 4. Owner of described property: Daniel 8 Susan Guggenheim Trust 5. Applicant for Special Review Use: _ Newport Pacific CApi al CQ. In(-- manniain3 agent 6. Zoning classification of property: RLD Residential Low Density 7. Existing improvements on property consist of: 159 mobile home spaces anrd common area which includes an office, club house, picnic area, playground and gpnrtc court ry storage yard 8. Duration of proposed Special Review Us, - Penranent Temporary Years e9 9. There is hereby attached a lis* of the names and addresses of all property owners within 300 feet of the property u;on which the Special Use permit is requested, and the required notices for mailing and postinq. 10. Additional comments: I do hereby certify that the above statements signed as an acknowledgement of that fac.. I or authorized to act as agent for the owner. Newport. Pacific Capital Co., Inc. App icant Mary Jo Goelzer, Vice Pres. are true and correct and the application is am the owner of the above described property Daniel 8 Susan Guggenheim Trust Owner 17300 Red 'iill Ave. ?280, Irvine, CA 92714 4100MacArthur Ave. #150 Newport Reach Address & Phone Number - ji-ddress & Phone Number' -'A' -'A 9ZubU 114/8.31-21 16 7(15/94 Da ted 7/15/94 Dated so Newport Pwffic CapiW company, Inc. September 27, 1994 M Holden TO AVON P.O. Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 Dear Mary: We would propose the follor ing standards for the Aspens Mobile Home Villaf Avon: SETBACKS The minimum setback along the periphery of a mobile home park or subdivision shall be 50 feet from a public. arterial street, 30 feet from a public collector or a public street. Any boundary not abutting a street will use setbacks as follows: There shall be a minimum of fifteen feet (15) from the body of one home to the next, side to side, with six feet (6) rear to rear. 'There shall be a minimum of six feet (6') from the front of the home to the interior private street. PARKING It is the responsibility of the Resident to keep his driveway clean, free of dirt and sealed. Driveways are to provide off-street parking for two resident cars. Each homesite will have a minimum of two 10'x 20'parking spaces, either side by side or in tandem. These spaces will be covered with gravel, asphalt or concrete. PAVING All paving will be to local/state code with a minimum of two inches (2") of asphalt over a four inch (4") base. DECKING Decks are not required, but, if desired by resident, all decks must have bandrails in compliance with state and local codes. When installing decks, a permit is required prior to installation. All decking must be approved in writing by the Man2gement prior to installation When a home is sold, it is required that the seller build proper stairs and hand rail for the rear door. It is also required that seller build entry stairs and landing with hand rails. All deck and stair pians are to be approved by the Management. 17300 Red 1401 A.e . Swm'_80. Imnc. California 92714 Telephone 714:852.5575 FAX 714/852-3582 in Mary Holden Town of Avon STORAGE BUILDING All mobile home lots shall be allowed individual storage sheds not to exceed 120 square feet per lot Building materials composing the exterior facade must be consistent with materials used to the park or subdivision and with each other. Storage sheds must be kept on the driveway side of the mobile home. Written permLsion from Management must be obtained before installation of a shed. Storage sheds must be kept on the driveway side of the mobile home. Writtenpermission from Management must be obtained before Installation of a shed. Storage sheds will be permitted only when construction materials, design, shed location and color are approved in writing by the Park Management or agent LANDSCAPING The site plan shall include a landscapping plan prepared by Resident or agent, which shows size, species andlocadoa a: plant materials. Landscaping shall be completed, weather permitting, within 90 days after occupancy permit. Sincerely, NEWPORT PACIFIC CAPITAL COMPANY, INC M o(�idelz�'r Via President MJG/Ive PLANNING A,.) ZON NG COMMISSION STAFF ^ PORT October 18, 1994 Lot 58, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Sindlinger Residence Condition of Approval -- Landscape Plan PROJECT TYPE: Single Family Residence ZONING: PUD COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES INTRODUCTION: Mr. Bruce Sindlinger has submitted a revised landscape plan as required by his Final Design Review condition of approval. STAFF COMMENTS The revised landscape plan includes the following material: Spruce 1 4-5' Spruce 1 6' Spruce 1 8- Narrowleaf Cottonwood 3 2" caliper Aspen 8 2" caliper Crabapple 2 2" caliper Chokecherry 4 5 gallon Potentilla 9 5 gallon 2,400 square feet of sod is proposed and irrigation has not been indicated. Due to the watering restrictions that were in effect this past summer and potential restriction next summer, an inigation system is strongly encouraged. The proposed landscape plan is included in your packet. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommend the Commis -lion approve the application with a strong suggestion that automatic irrigation be installed. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action PLANNING A .D ZONING COMMISSION STAFF .,SPORT October 18, 1994 Lot 58, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Sindlinger Residence Condition of Approval -- Landscap- Plan Respectfully submitted, Mary Holden Town Planner PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions (Vl� Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) pQ Date A.r. /8 �%� Sue Railton, Secretary T� The ormtission granted approval for Sindlinger Land with the staff recormendation that irrigation be ad W bok / 001 VA I , `AA I n�— 10 PLANNING Ai.il ZONING COMMISSION STAFF .�ZPORT • October 18, 1994 a Tract N, Block 3, Benchmark at !leaver Creek Upper Eagle Valley Sanitation District Bldg. Re -Roof Final Design Review -Roof Material Change PROJECT TYPE: Sanitation Building ZONING: GPEH COMPLIES WITH, ZONING? YES INTRODUCTION: Upper Eagle Valley Sanitation is requesting a roof material change on half of their building. The existing material on the building is half cedar shake shingle and half metal roof. The request is to make the entire roof metal. The metal will be etched galvanized. STAFF COMMENTS: In order to reduce glare, the proposed metal is etched galvpni.ed. Further, the architectural style of the building lends itself to a metal roof. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Commission approv-s this application with the following condition he existing and new mete roof have an etched or acid wash treatment to reduce glare 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation ? Commi,�sior. Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Mary Holden Town Planner RECOMMENDED ACTION: PLANNING At.0 ZONING COMMISSION STAFF ..r:PORT October 18, 1994 Tract N, Block 3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Upper Eagle Valley Sanitation District Bldg. Re -Roof Final Design Review -Roof Material Change PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved wilt recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date_ Sue Railton, Secretary Af4 The Com^fission motioned to table Final Design Review -Roof t4aterial Charge unci applicant as produced sample ot the meta -T. PLANNING AiN ZONING COMMISSION STAFF .,iEPORT October 18, 1994 Lot 8, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision Simon Res::cnce Final Design Review Modification of Color PROJECT TYPE: Duplex ZONING: RD COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES INTRODUCTION: The Simon's have submitted a revised color scheme for their duplex on Lot 8, Block 4, Wildridge. The proposed colors are Poetic Peach for the upper level and Palladian Peach for the lower level. The vertical posts, the horizontal railings, the window frames, and the garage door are white. STAFF COMMENTS The color chips will be presented at the Commission meeting. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff has no recommendation. RECOMMENDED ACTION: I Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4 Commission Action Respectfully submitted, -- f ,X Mary Holden" Town Planner PLANNING An il ZONING COMMISSION STAFF ,.LPORT October 18, 1994 Lot 8, Bloc': 4, Wildridge Subdivision Simon Residence Final Design Review Modification of Color PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions (4 Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date `4,f Sue Railton, Secretary__.,C2 �. The Commission approved Design Review Modification of Color with the following conditions: 1) Present color rendering to staff to add to a consent agenda 2) provide physical samples of the shades of white stucco colors �o staff—so connission CdF1 ViLW, drid all -e�sed changes architecturally are subject t, ctaff checking the height of the building which include; the height Of the third garage. � �� r� � � +� �� . ' y -a 4 � �� r� � .� +� �, ' y -a 4 '' � ti +� �, ' y -a 4 '' � ti . , f .. r ' y -a * � ti . , , � , y t } i i y } y r } 12 om .li ®'J 1 44 t 0 ae r� ti ®'J 1 44 Ald*� 1010.. PLANNING AtgO ZONING COMMISSION STAFF.. PORT October 18, 1994 Lot 63, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Seasons at Avon Final Design Review - Modifications -Addition of Roof Top Mechanical Equipment PROJECT TYPE: Commercial Building ZONING: TC - Town Center COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES INTRODUCTION: Shelia Peterson has submittf.d an application for approval of a roof top commercial kitchen ventilator and a rooftop heating unit with outside air hood and supply plenum. Attached is a site plan indicating the location and an elevation of the equipment. STAFF COMMENTS: The purpose of the heating unit is make up air for the Type 1 hood. Should the environmental and kitchen -ir mix, the restaurant will smell like the kitchen. The color of the units will match their background. Screening is not being requested since it will add to the mass and draw attention to the units on the roof. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission approve this application with the following conditions I . The units be paintel to match and blend with the surrounding co!ors. RECOMMENDED ACTION: I. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, �2 Mary Hold� Town Planner -N PLANNING Ai.ZONING COMMISSION STAFF PORT October 18, 1994 Lot 63, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Seasons at Avon Final Design Review - Modifications -Addition of Roof Top Mechanical Equipment PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date t�/f 1WIx, Sue Railton, Secretary " ine co,nmissionranted a roval to Final Design Review - Modifications - Addition of nod Top Mechanical Equipment and the staffs recommendation Of the condition that the units be painted to match the surrounding lit Ji -J' IL --- y. e @D— I A ! .: r" Ji -J' IL --- y. e @D— ,s . i ' R • Iii , ` •+ " t4 l•� I� a i• q - i ro � VIII 7 � j 1 I1 �• 1 tt 10-03-1994 11:05AM FROM CART COMPANIES THE DART TO 13038455560 P.02 COMPANIES 233 Milwaukee • Denver. Colorado 80206 . 303/3331933 . Fa. 303/333-1905 Cctober 3, 1994 VIA FAX Mr. Rob Galvin, President Camp Cafe, Inc. 137 Benchmark Road, #4W Avon, CO 81620 Dear Rob. This letter serves as confirmation of our approval of your location of the commercial kitchen ventilator and the roof top heating unit with outside air hood and supply plenum per our discussion on Sunday, October 2nd. After you have received approval from the Design Review Board, please send to me the proper docurntntation. Very truly yours, i5�L �A-x� Thomas Gart Manager ..von Partner I LLC TG/rm L TOTAL P.02 CREATIVE AIR P.O. Box 1025 GYPSUM, COLORADO 81637 Phone 524-9693 ^.-tober 4, 1994 To Whom It May Concern: This is in reference to the rooftop equipment to be installed on a portion of the roof of 137 Benchmark Road, Avon, CO, directly above the premises occupied by Camp Caf6. I have buen working with the owners of Camp Cafd with the purpose of providing them with an exhaust fan and makeup air system necessary for their needs. It is their intention to prepare food items within their premises. Consequently, they require a makeup air system as well as an exhaust fan. Both of these pieces of equipment need to be externally, or roof, mounted above the premises. The smallest and most compact makeup air unit available on the market which will meet their end use is 86" long and 48" high with an inlet which extends an additional 17 3/8" from its end. The inlet is 36" high. The total length of this cabinet unit is, therefore, 103 3/8". Additionally, a second piece of equipment, an exhaust fan, which must be roof mounted, is also required for their purposes. This ventilator is 31" high and needs to be mounted on a 12" curb. Insofar as the makeup air unit is concerned, there are no smaller sizes available in the market since the cabinet is a factory standard size. Both the makeup air unit and exhaust fan are intended to be positioned on the roof above the interior hood and cannot be installed in interior space. I have enclosed cut sheets which detail the specifications of both the rooftop makeup air unit and exhaust fan. In my opinion, there is no alternative method or equipment which will meet the needs of the owners of Camp Cafe. The makeup air unit casing and exhaust fan may be painted in a color to match that portion of the stucco surface of The Seasons at Avon building against which the units would be silhouetted rendering them as unobtrusive as is possible. c e r e I 'Rick Bright Enc. COMMERCIAL KITCHEN VENTILATORS ntilators meet NFPA 961991 installa- .n requirements -It-drive upblast design; 15 and 20" odels mount on roof or wall opplied with variable pitch sheave .-move grease -laden and foul air u j to 102F from commercial kitchen ap. lances including grilles, ovens, fryers, leges, and steam tables .lrnished with exterior mounted .•ather•tight junction box and external .rase drain pipe ninum housing and wheel. Base and •alts of galvanized steel anally cooled motor compartment is ,ed nut „Ile discharge .111, stream •nanently lubricated ball bearings, 1725 %I hall hearing motor and drive are ced .eparately when ordered with I a lur Listing under Power Ventilaton for laurant Apphmlres tYZIIN't, SOb)eel tlnly fur Stock Nos. ofvenlilaturs sola plcle with motor and drive Ventila must be mounted on 18' high steel 1 curb to comply with NFPA 96 and IIL de N'ZIIW UL n --j MH 12596 Davttnl Electric Ntfg Co. certr lies that the belt drrw•venUlm ton shown herein are h roio ceased to bear the A511",\ Seal The ratings shown .1I. '---- put based on tests and p.oredw: ANIC rill t•d 1O.let n Dee \\ " performed r edinac,or 211 •.,1 :amply ..'.h the requln m'� 1)l the AIoCA Certified plat::. 1 5 Program The ASICA Certll, 1 20 vngs seal apples to air perform:wt.24'.. '11g, only 10 No. SC512, 5C513 Shown With Optional Grease Collector Box No. SC51/0, 5C511 ,7--r-4 � VENTILATORS LESS MOTOR AND DRIVE I:IM AIH III IIVI NY At RPM fNllA% VINrIIArORS Willi MOIOR ANO DRIVE flI6" Seal VV .I cull bnuno. Moron WI W. Stook No 5CS1O $974 IN, $583.50 w.. al'S4U SC 511 1371 (4) 821.00 W, 11 "t'CH0 d,l :II SC512 15112 tin 947.50 1111 Sl :Sti .I 5C513 2180120' 1311.00 llat11n I 54'541 VENTILAYORS WITH 1725 RPM, BALL BEARING DAYTON MOVR AND DRIVE SEE WARRANTY INFORMATION ON PAGE OPPOSITE INSIDE BACK COVER 2465 I:IM AIH III IIVI NY At RPM fNllA% VINrIIArORS Willi MOIOR ANO DRIVE bnuno. Moron 1�Ph 1. Moran •1)l "' S" V. !• 1 ' 1'P !a• Ill 230Y. 60 Nr Shp 1 230/460V. 60 H, Shya n sl' SP SP SP Sr .' RPM Rr .m1. y�: I'll E..h WE stork Na lot [aeM1 Wt a ISIS 11111 875 -_-- IENN• 714410 111 Ii $111.00 11.13;1 7841S S118229 $737.00 1136 17711 1425 1205 - :I Ilio 7Hd 11 714.0011-11 �•1 � 711416 118782 740.501140 2030 1735 1560 13415 -- 4 1231) 7HI12 726.0011511 711417 11817t 737.00 11SH 2375 2115 2000 IN145 1510 " 144y1 71 .13 760.50 11'411 714418 I:II tai 755.00 119 it 2800 2585 2465 2370 21"20 141:1 .II 1610 711414 767.50 12121 711419 I: III 771.50 1::: 0 1245 2570 1985 ---- B.0 785 71421 986.00 1,1.1 71427 1'413 0`1 981.00 1 384U 3380 3055 2,570 - HB iNNI 714422 993.50 714428 Ir 10 11 997.00 1.: 4305 3925 3670 3380 2475 - 109 981 7H121 1042.0011. 714429 11AR 111021.001. 5020 4695 4b10 4:115 MINE - - 129 1110: 711114 1087.00 1 714430 1 S 1049.00 LI 5605 5305 5150 49115 4800 3400 2120 14.5 124.:. - 714431 1079.001 4'h 4!190 4lU5 3Tfl5 2125 - 88 0191 711432 o 1159.00 211 1 711438 1162.00 21 I 5615 4975 4650 4155 - 89 T2:.' 114433 1:I. /211.00_11). ]14439 190 1214001111 1 6590 6035 5755 5505 4930 Ila Ale 711434 :11,21 1251.002'.1 71440 5 2I4.0011U6 20 " 734io 61175 6620 6360 5 - 855 134 1115 ' - - 7114 4 1 - 1 2 38.00 '2 9 85441 8125 7900 7675 7230 6170 51M 159 1045.1 - - 7442• 11 1248.00'2478 10305 99 15 9755 9575 9185 8485 8489.5 140 1240 f, - - 7 H 4 5 3 127-1.00 .151 9 a 7605 5X45 4910 2930 - 107 5501 17H444 2133 M. 1590.00344, 711444 � � 1565.00:11:11 9045 7640 6930 0135 1910 127 6301', 7X445 MEN 88 1635.00 tic - 711450 1538.00.11113 10291 9175 0.5181 7760 GltlO- 145 085 - - 714451 714452 1623.003112 I G ] 2.00 x17.4 11870 144451311M, 10980 10515 13315129% 11980 0.585 4875 12110 9795 8774) 17 1 1911 791 7 140.. - 1 - - - ,714453 11,43.0014.'..1 rtormano• shown Ir far MJI Anse .,�nldaton alp(„1: du. n HIII' Ataro n•I u1• aul� d•nr 1�1r.. NOTE: See Accessones ort Nearby Pages to Comply with NFPA 96 1991. See page 2464for Ventilated Roof Curbs and Hinged Curb Assembly. See page 2466 for Discoonc(, Switches, Grease Collecto, Box, and Weather Resistant Junction Be.. SEE WARRANTY INFORMATION ON PAGE OPPOSITE INSIDE BACK COVER 2465 SEP -28-94 WED 12:10 'NES TRANE FAX NO. --137790714 POWER VENTING 'A- --28+b--1-26---1F % Ac \� l r I187S x C P. 02 16 1575.12 1L�- w"...}--- �`� �rnc` Z; 1 + _ HegM - 8755. -- % 'A• = 4 13" i 1674• 1 L 1 s_ 2 1-13'f�\ - Clearance Dim 151• �� For Pull-out Sumer 195. Side View Curb —57 % ENV 0 Haight 661A--� `(4174• Dia Between e BOTTOM PA \ HEATING C] SU LLYPLENUM WITH \ " 01HUODP WITH . OOT -ICM RA \ . (APPro Anchx Holes SUPPLY PLENUM Side View End View (W/0 OA Hood) ARRANGEMENT _ 2 " ROOFTOP UNIT W17H ❑ 3 " ROOFTOP HEATING UNIT WITH 0 Fktz. PA 4 - ROOFTOP HHEAPNO UNIT WITH ❑ 6 - ROOFTOPHEATINGD UNIT T TOM RLN 'pHEATING 6. O '4 -86'A- 26% 2914--1— 25 �-- 291A- �P 025 250 43"A4 66% 29% 12% 21% 36% 42% 40114. 39% 29'%. (Z Iwo % % _ D 26.20 030 900 49%, 66% 34% 12% 23% 41% 47A 46%. 44% 36'A. �16TQ0 % A 036 360 64'%. 56% 40% 12% 234 47% 53% 61'%. 60% 40'%. W IaM % % Q120d0 '10uei6. 61Wn [�11 101316 I%W AY ONN OI.P.e Ar onm 4* 67611 2 C 1575.12 1L�- w"...}--- M---�1 .J HegM - 8755. -- % ----— A'A." Dia. Anchor Holes Side View ARRANGEMENT M 7 HOPIROOFOP HEAT UIG UNIT WITH PPLYY PLENUM e BOTTOM PA \ HEATING C] SU LLYPLENUM WITH \ " 01HUODP WITH . OOT -ICM RA \ SUPPLY PLENUM 025 250 43"A4 66% 29% 12% 21% 36% 42% 40114. 39% 29'%. (Z Iwo % % _ D 26.20 030 900 49%, 66% 34% 12% 23% 41% 47A 46%. 44% 36'A. �16TQ0 % A 036 360 64'%. 56% 40% 12% 234 47% 53% 61'%. 60% 40'%. W IaM % % Q120d0 '10uei6. 61Wn [�11 101316 I%W AY ONN OI.P.e Ar onm 4* 67611 2 C c SEP -28-94 WED 1,1,11 ---'rflYNES TRANE FAX NG+ -%3037790714 P. 03 71e jLi FAN SECTION -1) --- FURNACE I SUPPLY PLENUM SUPPLY _Itt SIDE VIEW n; B t -..__._ J.. TOP VIEW 4,. SIDE VIEW ynr rntna A & 5• — GRNC/GRPC'tt 1 u+r.aan.cdrd ^�•wn+w�wimrblar"J"a pA0 61 NY 9D 7IMo 4YAb .a a 9* PMt^ No ^V^+opww'a~a Y nq.Ara W Anmrprn" I" 7. d h"" R. M w be 1 a n urn w cwt 2&Aa. OY nu.a K] 7�8 u SEP -28-94 WED 12.13 ^4AYNES TRANE FAX N42„30377907'.4 P.05 MECHANICAL SPECIFICATIONS ROOFTOP GAS HEATING UNITS SINGLE FURNACE ARRANGEMENTS 2-9 General Units are completely factory assembled, piped, wired, and test fired. All units are A.G.A. Certified and conform with the latest ANSI Standards for safe and efficient performance. Units are mounted on steel rails with liking and anchor holes, and are suitable for slab or curb mounting. Units are available for operation on either natural or LP (propane) gas. CASING Casings are c ie•formed, 20 gauge galvanized steel and finished in air-dry enamel. The side panels are easily removed to provide service access. Fan sections and supply plenums are insulated with fire resistant, odorless, mat faced one inch glass fiber materials. Outside air hoods are provided with wire mesh inlet screens. Standard filters are one inch permanent washable type. HEAT EXCHANGER Standard heat exchanger construction consists of seam welded 20 gauge aluminized steel tubes and 18 gauge aluminized steel headers. Flue Collector Standard flue collector construction is corrosion resistant aluminized steel. Flue Vent Cap Standard natural vent units are provided with a vent cap designed for gravity venting. Outside air for combustion enwrs at the base of the vent cap through a protective grille, and products of combustion are discharged through the upper section of the flue ventcap. Burners Burners are die -formed, corrosion resistant aluminized steel, with stainless steel port protectors. Port protectors prevent foreign matter from oostructlrg the; . • mer ports. Burners individual; removable for ease of inspection and servicing. The entire burner assembly Is easily removable with its slide -out drawer design, The pilot is also acce�ib;o through an access plate without removing the burner drawer assembly. Fans Centrifugal fan is belt driven with adjustable pitch motor sheave. Motor and fan are dynamically balanced for quiet operation. Motors Standard motors are 230 volt 60 Hertz, single phase, open drip proof with internal overload protection up to 2 hp and external overload protection over 2 hp. Optional 115/60/1 motors are available on 1/2 to 2 hp models. Optional 208, 230, 460/60/3 motors are available on 1/2 to 5 hp models. Motor wiring is enclosed in 12 inch Greenfield cable. Modulating Dampers Units with outside and return air (Arrangements 5 and 9) provided with interlocked dampers and modulating motor and controls as standard. Damper controls modulate dampers in response to a sensing bulb in the mixed air stream. Provided as standard with a remote potentiometer for minimum outside air damper position. Dampers and controls are optional on all other unit arrangements. Controls A factory installed junction box is provided for all power connections. Standard units are provided with a 24 volt combination single stage automatic gas valve, including main operating va!ve and pilot and safety shutoff, pressure regulator, manual main and pilot shutoff valve, and adjustable pilot S valve. Gas valve is suitable to a maximum inlet pressure of 0.5 psi (14" W,C.) on natural gas. A 24 volt control transformer, high Umit switch, and fan time delay relay are provided. The fan delay relay delays the fan start until the heat exchanger reaches a predetermined temperature. It also allows the fan to operate after burner shutdown, removing residual heat from the heat exchanVr: All units provided with a solid state ignition control system which ignites the intermittent pilot by spam during each cycle of operation. When pilot flame is proven, main burner valve opens to allow gas flow to burners. Pilot and burners are extinguished during off cycle. SEP -28-94 WED 12114 1 -"'NES TRANE FAX N0, ^137790714 P.06 FACTORY INSTALLED OPTIONS Control options "%,TwoStage Gas Valve Provides two stages of heat. Ignition is at lowfire (50% of the unit's rated Input), Requires the use of two-stage thermostat ❑ Hydraulic Modulating Gas Valve provides modulated heat output. ignition is at low fire (504/4 input), and discharge temperature sensing bulb located in the air stream modulates the gas input from 100% to 50% rated input. Provided with an automatic electric valve in series which cycles the unit in response to a tow voltage single -stage thermostat. ❑ Hydraulic Modulating Gas Valve with Bypass An additional electric valve in parallel bypasses the hydraulic modulating valve, overriding the discharge temperature sensing bulb, allowing full fire. Requires the use of a separate thermostat to control the electric valve. ❑ Electronic Modulating Gas Valve (Natural Gas Units Only) provides modulated heat output- ignition utputignition is at full fire (100% Input), and modulates the gas input from 100% to 50% rated input. Available for use with a room thermostat or duct thermostat with remote set point adjustment Duct thermostat available with optional ovenide room thermostat which causes the unit to go to full fire when the room temperature falls below the override room thermostat's set point. Most Exchanger Options �[ Type 409 Stainless Steel Heat exclvinger tubes and headers are seam welded 20 gauge type 409 stainless steel. C] Type 321 Stainless Steel Heat exchanger tubes and headers are seam welded 20 gunge type stainless steel. Additional options x Type 4o9 Stainless Steel Burners ❑ Orifices for Elevations over 2W0 Feet !�g Type 4o9 Stainless Steel Flue Collector ❑ Totally Enclosed Motor ❑ 115 Volt Convenience Outlet ❑ Power Venting Vent fan provides power venting. Outside air for combustion and products of combustion have inlet and discharge grilles located In the upper section of a split side panel. G Two Position Dampers Instead of full modulation, units with outside and return air (arrangements 5 and 9) provided with two position spring return damper motor and controls. Powers the outside air damper either full open and return air dampers full closed, or outside air damper full closed and return air damper open in response to an outside air temperature sensor. Units with outside air or return air only (arrangements 2-4, 6-8) provided with damper, two position spring return damper motor and controls. Powers the damper full open when unit is on, and to full closed when unit is shut down. ❑ Manual Dampers Instead of full modulation, units with outside and return air (arrangements 5 and 9) provided with manually set outside and return air dampers. C3 Dry Bulb Economizer bub economizer utilizes Optional dry outside air for cooling (ventilating) whenever possible. When outside air is below the temperature setpoint the dry bulb economizer modulates the return and fresh air dampers to maintain the setpolnt Available on Arrangement 5 or 9 only. (Recommend use of economizer in ventilating cycle only.) ❑ Enthalpy Controlled Economizer outside laier for (PY cooling (vz (ventimizer lating) whenever possible. An enthalpy controlled economizer responds to dry-bulb temperature and humidity, utilizing outdoor air for cooling (ventilating) when the outdoor air temperature and humidity are below the setpoint Available on Arrangement 5 or 9 only. (Recommend use of economizer in ventilating cycle only.) ❑ Magnetic Starter ❑ Spring Return Modulating Damper Motor Used in lieu of standard modulating damper motor, closes outside air damper on loss of power. Firestat Shuts unit off if air reaches predetermined temperature. Can activate remote alarm. Requires manual reset ❑ Return Air Mounted ❑ Supply Air Mounted ❑ Une Voltage Motor Contactor ❑ Low Voltage Motor Contactor L SEP -28-94 WED 12115 I` 'NES TRANE FAX N0. '-'37790714 P.07 FIELD INSTALLED ArCESSORIES ❑ LP (Propane) to Natural Goo Conversion Package Ll High Gas Une Pressure Regulator Reduces main gas line pressure from a nu-Amum of 125 psi to a minimum of 7 Inches W.C. Optional FOters (One Inch Permaswit Standard) ❑ One Inch permanent ❑ Two Inch permanent ❑ One inch throwaway ❑ Two inch throwaway ❑ Remote control panel Contains switches for system (heat-offcool) and fan (on -auto) as well as B Indicator lights for field use with 42 field selectable labels. Mounts on 4 z 4 junction box with plaster ring for Isolation. ❑ Clogged Filter swi" I.; Senses suction Increase by blower due to filter obstruction. Indicates locally and has normally open contacts which can be connected to the remote control panel. J Disconnect Switch �j Roof Mounting Curb (Arrangements 4-9) Thermostats ❑ Low voltage room thermostat, single -stage Cl Low vohaga rot ,n 'iermostat, single stage with fan auto -on switch ❑ Low voltage room thermostat single -stege with fan auto -on switch and system heat -off -cool switch ❑ Low voltage room thermostat two-st.Ne ❑ Low voltage room thermostat two-stage with fan auto -on switch and system off-heat-autc-cool switch ❑ Universal tamperproof guard iur all room thermostats Cl Low voltage duct then hostat single -stage 1 Low voltage duct thermostat two-stage ❑ Room thermostat electronic modulating control ❑ Duct thermostat electronic modulating control ❑ Override room thermostat, for use with duct thermostat and electronic modulating control 7 Planning ands_,oning Commission Staff Report October 13, 1994 T. J. Connor Building Site Plan Modifications Lot 14-13, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek PROJECT TYPE: Industrial/Commercial ^ ZONING: IC COMPLIES WITH ZONING? Yes INTRODUCTION Peter Sullivan, on behalf of T. J. Connor, has submitted an application for site plan and retaining wall modifications The originally approved site plan indicated two retaining walls on the west portion of the site. Currently, there is one proposed at approximately 16' in height. The revised site plan includes significant modifications to grading and drainage. A major section of retaining wall has been deleted along the driveway at the northwest corner of the site. The retaining walls will be painted Light Stone and the "A" retaining walls will receive a stucco finish. The surface treatment of the retaining walls complies with the intent of the design guidelines. STAFF COMMENTS This project is currently being reviewed for a preliminary condominium plat. The proposed site plan submitted with this application does not match the preliminary condominium plat or the original site plan that the building permit was based on. Proposed changes in the retaining walls and grading has resulted in significant impacts including unacceptable drainage, driveway grades increased to 12%, plus a 16 foot vertical drop in the center of the parking lot and others listed below: I . Trash enclosure locatie. s are not shown any more. 2. Drainage on the northwest portion of the site indicates Flowing onto the driveway and down onto Metcalf Road, which is not acceptable. 3. Drainage on the southeast portion of the site indicates flow onto the adjacent property, which is not acceptable. 4. Grading exceeds 2:1 slopes. 5. Detention is inadequate for drainage. 6. Driveway width has decreased to 10' from 16', which is inadequate. 7. A guardrail on the wall between north and south parking lots is needed. The impacts the above mentioned items are of major concern. A'1 r Planning and ;Luning Commission Staff Report October 18, 1994 T. J. Connor Building Site Plan Modifications Lot 14-15, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommendation is for the Commission to approve the retaining wall surface treatment and deny the site modifications. The applicant must construct the project in accordance with the approved plans or submit revised plans for approval prior to construction. RECOMMENDED ACTION Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully Submitted, Mary Holden Town Planner Planning and 4eining Commission Staff Report October 18, 1994 T. J. Connor Building Site Plan Modifications Lot 14-15, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions (✓S Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date Xf / Sue Railton, Secretary The Commission granted approval for T.J. Conner, Site Modifications only for the changes in the retaining wall at the center of the building from a double wall to a single wall. ROR -h• AY[ N I!' URyW.S M Mlh WROII ()]' f14[Y[M � lOf 1µp ].!• yl 1pl 1]1 R < 1' qlP. 1' N! 10 n .1LC019aR R(1f IIXY MW A.I Illbl WSRR pally{ I/.IJ / lTIp1 9`. ---+------ -rte. r "til. • of `� ,yl►� ,� r ,; y6 �,,,,`I �!„ro„ �, I /�I♦ i Npl- 1 .. �• ���/ A-411 .Y a� '+Rif^ •i i ` n It �'F p4 A-6 0 14A \ ,, .• ,� • •� -_-tn �� . _stuff ._c1?fya!�- IY, J tll\, NY MI N p- ,OI.N),! V.-IKIP[ M1VI�IbiY I ' �, • , 611 !o% 0" I- - a b� WallTreatment Legend rda Denotes a stucco finish; Light Stone color to match building facade (ref. Color Selection Guide by American Steel Building Co., Inc.) Denotes a paint finish; Light Stone color to match stucco (ref. Color Selection Guide) Refers to wall facade to receive treatment