Loading...
PZC Packet 100494PLANIJING A .d ZONING COMMJSSION STAFF ...:PORT October 4, 1994 Lot 4, Wildridge Acres Loft Addition Final Design Review - Modification PROJECT TYPE: Single Family Residence ZONING: PUD COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES STAFF COMMENTS: This request was tabled at the September 20, 1994 meeting due to lack of information. Staff has spoken with the applicant's architect and the information requested will be provided to Staff. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Table until the information requested is received or a letter is provided by the applicant requesting the application be withdrawn. Should Staff receive neither in time for the October 18, 1994 meeting, Staff will provide the Commission with a report recommending denial the application due to the requirement to take action on an application. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Introduce Application 2 Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4 Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Mary Holden Town Planner W PLANNING Aril) ZONING COMMISSION STAFF ,.r,PORT October 4, 1994 Lot 4, Wildridge Acres Left Addition Final Design Review - Modification PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( Date 10141Qc�— Sue Railto7edthis etary l The Commission once again tab i information to lack of sufficient PLANNING Aim ZONING COMMISSION STAFF PORT October 4, 1994 Lot 63, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Seasons at Avon Final Design Review -Sign Program Modification PROJECT TYPE: Master Sign Program ZONING: TC COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YPs INTRODUCTION Larry Ast has submitted an application modifying the Master Sign Program for the Seasons at Avon. Attached are the requested additions along with the previously approved sign program. REQUEST: The additional sign area will total approximately 43 square feet. Due to the mass of the building, it appears that the additional sign area will not over crowd the building. STAFF COMMENTS "Sign Guidelines" and review criteria from the Sign Code Section IS 28.060 Sign Design Guidelines A. Harmonious with Town Scale. Sign location, configuration, design, materials, and colors should be harmonious with the existing signs on the stt Acture, with the neighborhood, and with the townscape. B Harmonious with Building Scale. the sign should be harmonious with the building scale, and should not visually dominate the structure to which it belongs or call undue attention to itself C Materials. Quality sign materials, including anodized metal; routed or sandblasted wood, such as rough cedar or redwood, interior -lit, individual Plexiglas -faced letters, or three dimensional individual letters with or without indirect lighting, are encouraged. Sign materials, such as printed plywood, interior -lit box -type plastic, and paper or vinyl stick -on window signs are discouraged, but may be approved, however, if determined appropriate to the location, at the sole discretion of the Commission. D. Architectural Harmony The sign and its supporting structure should be in harmony architecturally, and in harmony in color with the surrounding structures E. Landscaping. Landscaping is required for all free-standing signs, and should be designed to enhance the signage and surrounding building landscaping. PLANNING AevD ZONING COMMISSION STAFF .,SPORT October 4, 1994 Lot 63, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Seasons at Avon Final Design Review -Sign Program Modification F. Reflective Surfaces. Reflective surfaces are not allowed. G. Lighting. Lighting should be of no greater wattage than is necessary to make the siga %isible at night, and should not reflect unnecessarily onto adjacent properties. Lighting sources, except neon tubing, should not be directly visible to passing pedestrians or vehicles, and should be concealed in such a manner that direct light does not shine in a disturbing manner. H. Location. On multi -story buildings, individual business signs shall generally be limited to the ground level. Section 15.28 070 - Sign Design Review Criteria In addition to the sign Design Guidelines listed above, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall also consider the following criteria while reviewing proposed sign designs: A. The suitability of the improvement, including materials with which the sign is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located: Comment: The proposed sign is consistent with the Town' ";gn Design Guidelines. B. The nature of adjacent and neighboring improvements: Comment The sign materials are consistent with allowed signs on adjacent and neighboring buildings. C. The quality of the materials to be utilized in any proposed improvement Comment. The quality of the proposed sign materials are acceptable D. The visual impact of any proposed improvement as viewed from anv adjacent or neighboring property. Conunent The visual impact of these proposed improvements will be consistent with existing arca signs E. The objective that no improvement will be so similar or dissimilar to other signs in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic , will be impaired Comment: The proposal meets the intent of this c-iteria. PLANNING A.4D ZONING COMMISSION STAFF _.SPORT October 4, 1994 Lot 63, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Seasons at Avon Final Design Review -Sign Program Modification F. Whether the type, height, size, and/or quantity of signs generally complies with the sign code and appear to be appropriate for the project: Comment: T type, si, - and location of the proposed sign generally complies with the Sign Code. G. Whether the sign is primarily oriented to vehicular or pedestrian traffic, and whether the sign is appropriate for the determined orientation. Comauent: These signs are primarily oriented toward vehicular traffic. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Planning and Zoning approve this application as presented. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Introduce Application Applicant Presentation 3 Commission Review 4 Commission Action Respectfully Submitted titary Holden Town Planner "r �001 PLANNING A,iD ZONING COMMISSION STAFF _.SPORT October 4, i 994 Lot 63, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Seasons at Avon Final Design Review -Sign Program Modification PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted (W Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date loldj_ttjSue Railton, 0 DATE: September 20, 1994 TO: Mary Holden Town of Avon Planning FROM: Larry Ast RE: Seasons At Avon Amendment #1 to Season At Avon Sign Program Change #l: Addition of Corporate Logo and "Vail kssociates, Inc. Corporate Offices' Material- gold painted aluminum letters. Same as previously approved. Placement- so, -+h east comer of building overhang, flush mounted. See exhibits 1-A and 1-B Change 92: Addition of Corporate Logo and "Vail Associates, Inc. Corporate Offices' and Seasons Logo. Material- gold painted aluminum letters. Same as previously approved. Placement- east and west wing walls to left and right of main south entry. See exhibits 2-A and 2-13. Change #3: Addition of text "EAST TOWER" & "WESr T TOWER" to north building entryways. Materials- gold painted prismatic aluminum letters. Same as previously approved. Placement- centered on stucco over doorway arch. See exhibit 3-A HIGHTECHSIGNS P.O. Box 2688 Vail, CO 81658 303.919.3565 FAX: 919-1670 Production Center 910 Nottingham Road Suite S.2 Avon, CO 81620 Aspen & Glcnwood Sprgs 303.915.6695 EIGNS -E- . . SIGN DRAWING P.O. BOX 2688. VAIL, CO 81 658 .303.949.4565 FAX: 303.949.4670 VA I � irvS"; l airs }rN= co fiPo M -Tc 9i+ai LtS Z,e7401/ or �f•✓ .,E P 2Neti .�fi�3on,ct � ��✓ - i JOB #-- DATE T9L / BY—_ A/E_L^i✓�_ --- CLIENTYY• }/�f,✓</Au S /y ----—CONTACT SCALE_._ PHONE ____ -- FAX: -� �SIGNS SIGN DRAWING P.O. BOX 2688 . VAJL, CO 81 658 . 303.949.4565 . FAX: 303.949.4670 0 z J'H v' L 0 �, n \1 p �o t� FfiS T L'o.v✓cti od c� �%B�✓q JOB # DATEf SI BY L CLIENT -AL- 44:1,f—el AYIZ< =WC J ►b s LIM; A/E CONTACT P�Q ,C?Z,t)_ SCALE PHONE -- FAX: =ISIGNS SIGN DRAWING P.O. BOX 2688 . VAIL, CO 81 658 . 303.949.4565 . FAX: 303.949.4670 V1.11rq gal,�n.'V�, SeksU.)s x°50 VA ASScc:nzc:.'. 7-1 D 11 yr oN Cu"/ ' G,!�r//S F�k fVlb'l� JOBtt DATEL/ --. AVE �BY _____ _._ CLIENT /—. f'�<IA I -I S ,,2242 _ _ _ CONTACT , /-2 SCALE__ PHONE FAX _ _ A m r -==SIGNS LREMIMM SIGN DRAWING P O BOX 2683 VAIL, CO 81658 . 303.949.4565. FAX 303.949.4670A a,L CONTACT. FAX !. BUILDING IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE PROGRAM SEASONS AT AVON AVON,COLORADO AUGUST, 1994 Item #1: Canopy - Exhibit #1 "SEASONS" 1 to 3 sets of cast metal text 24" high. Gold painted aluminum, prismatic letter form. Item #2: Four towers- Exhibit #2 North facing, one set per tower of "SUMMER' "FALL" "WINTER„ "SPRING" 16" high gold painted aluminum, no illumination proposed. Item #3: Parking entry - Exhibit #3, illumination proposed. "PARKING ENTRY" 12" high gold painted alum "SHOPS, OFFICES & CONDOMINIUMS" 8" high gold alum "EXIT ONLY" 12" high gold alum 2 Do not enter symbols 12" high red & white CLEARANCE 8'0" 6" plastic pipe, red Item #4: North Atrium - Exhibit #4 reflective graphics. "SEASONS" - 24" reverse pan channel letters. Gold color, prismatic face, white neon glow from rear. Item 95: Monument Sign- Exhibit #5 Illuminated sign, 2 faces, routed metal face with plex copy, stucco base. a rMAI aSIGNS 0w SIGN DRAWING P.O. BOX 2688 . VAR, CO 81658 . 303.949.4565 . FAX: 303.949.4670 u- JOB !t DATE BY--- _- A/E JE,hoaS CLIENT {.t AVuN CONTACT SCALE __ PHONE FAX:—_ =I = Mrwl=SIGNS SIGN DRAWING P.O. BOX 2688. VAIL, CO 81658 303.949.4565 . FAX: 303.949.4670 24' Lg(TC�'N:TIi CiO-i' ( L MWY Liz - I JOB X DATE BY "E CUENT Dwd Ll r fh , CONTACT__ / SCALE PHONE FAX =U1.01 M ECHSIGNS SIGN DRAWING P.O. BOX 2688 . VAR, CO 81658. 303.949.4565 . FAX: 303.949.4670 JOB A DATE BY hfYLE OC♦ Ni t�j SuER FALL W I N T E R SIRING CLIENT S£45%'US 4i 4 -VOA) CONTACT SCALE PHONE FAX: JOB =�SIGNS Y • • • CJ SIGN DRAWING P.O. BOX 2688 . VAR, CO 81 658 . 303.949.4565 . FAX: 303.949.4670 �.rtEFh "Pt�GNiiE YIN-M0L Af^cetc, Y3 �. s. b" a. p. WIiM G ONC Go FlNlyn. f EFL-eG foH �. DATE BY l_ a- CUENT�d/yi5 A -r AV04 _CONTACT. SCALE PHONE_ FAX Ex,6�L.f3 -z- w _ If =-= =_ =SIGNS N SIGN DRAWING P.O BOX 2688 . VA1L, CO 81 658 . 303.949.4565 . FAX: 303.949.4670 4 If�iwWiG7' � � I�i;il]�1IJ�1'llr WT -A II Rm a DD! �IL[E]EITI'll JOB a DATE 71/2-q, L BY -- CLIENT �'�,��rJs ' 1 AN01J SCALE-0"ADIr PHONE SEASONS / MONUMENT SIGN SPECIFICATIONS: OVERALL: 30'W X 72'"H PANELS 30 -Vo X 48"H MATERIALS: LASE 'L TOP / STUCCO FINISH_ PAINTED CARGE2 - LOGO ?ANEL / SATIN C -E. TC fGiD COLD FINISH / ENGRAVED LOGO COPY PANELS / �-- ALUMINUM DURANODIC FINISH COPY FONT FRIZ QUADRATA VAILAgWIATEti CUT-OUT/ �— CDR0001C ILLUMINATED S.,o2f-reer "T L0,4C.. TteM \ fAltv_i&K, _I A/E L AST CONTACT FAX I �r'J��.•�Ltf�"� � i �'����IIdI�i�I��i������II�IIIT�I1'��',� _ , 31 t .lN 4 ' 1 I �r'J��.•�Ltf�"� � i �'����IIdI�i�I��i������II�IIIT�I1'��',� _ , 31 r � � .rte T• i y . 1 ti's ' IF✓�'A� I .1♦ u1 I i '-�:'ti sur ♦ • H�.� r Gani -r _ 4yy''�•r' yt'Ms 1. u �a I o) '-�:'ti sur ♦ • H�.� r Gani -r _ 4yy''�•r' yt'Ms 1. u �a PLANNING Ao t) ZONING COMMISSION STAFF i.r:PORT October 4, 1994 Lot 63, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Seasons at Avon Final Design Review- Modifications PROJECT TYPE: Commercial Building ZONING: TC - Town Center COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES INTRODUCTION: Mark Donaldson, on behalf of the Seasons at Avon, has submitted an application for approval of modifications, which are as follows : 1. Modify south porte cochere by eliminating barrel roof and having flat roof, 2. Addition of porte cochere on north elevation to match porte cochere on south; and 3. Modify fence design around daycare playground. STAFF COMMENTS: 'The south porte cochere was approved with a barrel roof and the change would be to a flat roof with a stucco false front. The proposed north porte cochere will be of the same architectural style. The fence around the daycare playground will match the existing metal tube fences found elsewhere on the site The main comment concerning the daycare area is that the Mall Committee must approve the design and have a contract in place for use of the area and restoration provisions when the use ceases on the site. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission approve this application with the following conditions: I That all modifications match the approved color theme and design styles. 2. The daycare plavground area design receive the Mall Committee approval and if the design changes, the design be resubmitted for StalTapproval RECOMMENDED ACTION: I Introduce Application 2. .Applicant Presenta!ion 3. Commission Review 4 Commission Action PLANNING A, , J ZONING COMMISSION STAFF ..ZPORT October 4, 1994 Lot 63, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Seasons at Avon Final Design Review - Modifications Respectfully submitted, --Y' 19_j. Mary Holden Town Planner PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions OO .Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Dcnied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No .Action ( ) Date_ 4.4 ) q4 Sue Railton, S ee etaryC�9e(_2� C IKV416k1 he Commission granted approval as submitted R �v O 2o< o Z o o < d o a$md doQ F U1LL Z d 00 � � � ii r 9 Ul u 13 Q ZUis O-ArtaN .0-101 Lo r C n 2 - N4 TREATEp PLATES v 24 GA (J. FAeC1A 3.4• STU=O FMI&4 CvER I/1' yEATWW, L3 JUV4 STEEL ANGLE _ U&LD To ElEAM TO Oj pjW FASCIA TX4 PM STD WCMZDNTAL R>RR1W E"D" G QED 'L*ERIAL AS p1m ov. GRAVEL Exlem HEIL. — CANT STRIP PATQ4 ,qo CCWIS4aa FII®.Rocru To HM *TRACT Z b 7 p I I I sr- � I NON STMJCnMtAL FIpE1Y.LAS6 COLLrlNa YL rlAak. PAINTED To HATCb4 C XLrINS ON SOUTW ENTRANCE GM40PT'. e'43LE-PL7 ME}-Rtye ROCFlNG ON 2 LAYERS ^9RL N&LA.TION ISOAlm 014 T-ET.AL ROOF DECK STEEL i 2 00F DETAIL SCALE, 9/4'.-0• STD rWILL ANEW STftJCTURAL TUBE STEEL �ExISTING STEEL E@Am :1 0 44 0 9 6Q FETAL nm PAINTED 1A PETAL RAILRI6 PANT® 6' I STS. PRE 4' • STEEL PIPE PAINTED PAINTED 3 FENGE DETAIL SCALE: 1/4' I'-0' N PETAL 6ATE W45V TO POST - PAINTED IX] PETAL TwE PAINT® TOPRAIL 4' • STS PIPE. PAINTED ®Il��llfill f11!_��PAINTED FAINTED © • • • NOTE: FENGE rAM To MATCH DATCAM 6ECQ0 6TORT FENGE TOPRAIL 4' 1 STS PIPE EXTRA STRON6 STEEL PIPE • 6'- 5TEEL PPE • S'-- (j)- Rf TE — 11' • PILASTER (4)- 64 X �— POST SECTION SCALE: 314' • I' - O' 9 TE AT 4'-9' Planning and Luning Commission Staff Report October 4, 1994 T. J. Connor Building Special Review Use — Above Ground Power Lines to Building Lot 14-15, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek PROJECT TYPE: Special Review Use -Above Ground Power Lines -- Public Hearing ZONING: IC COMPLIES WITH ZONING? Upon Approval of SRU This is a Public Hearing for a Special Review Use to allow for above ground power lines to run to the structure. INTRODUCTION Peter Sullivan, on behalf of T. J. Connor, has submitted an application for a Special Review Use to allow above ground power lines to run to the building. The application states they were unable to obtain the easement through the adjacent property to run their power lines underground STAFF COMMENTS At the September 20, 1994 Commission meeting, the Commission directed the applicant to find an alternative easement through the adjacent property. The applicant sent a letter requesting a reply by September 30, 1994 As of the writing of this Staff report, there has been no indication whether the alternative easement is possible If the easement is not obtain through the west side of the adjacent property, consideration should be given to approval of the request with the condition that the location of the power line receive Design Review Approval from the Commission This suggestion is offered since the proposed location of the above ground power line does not appear to be the Lest location from an aesthetic point of ­iew Following are the criteria, as listed in Section 17 48 040, to consider for approval of a special review use A Whether the proposed use otherwise complies with all requirements imposed by the zoning code, COMMENT The proposed use complies with all requirements imposed by the Zoning Code, B Whether the proposed use is in conformance with the town comprehensive plan, COMMENT The proposed use would not comply with Goal 11 "Ensure that a high quality visual image of the 'mown is established through both public and private sector Planning and zoning Commission Stasi Report October 4, 1994 T. J. Connor Building Special Review Use — Above Ground Power Lines to Building Lot 14-15, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek activities." Object (e) states "Improve the appearance and image of the service district along Nottingham and Metcalf Roads through enhanced design, screening of activities, and landscaping. C. Whether the proposed use is compatible with adjacent uses. Such compatibility may be expressed in appearance, architectural scale and features, site design, and the control of any adverse impacts including noise, dust, odor, lighting, traffic, safety, etc. COMMENT: Adjacent uses may have above ground power lines, however, they were built prior to the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan and the goals and objectives. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning and Zomng Commission adopt Resolution 94-20, which denies the Special Review Use -- Above ground power lines, which include the findings for denial However, should the Commission decide to approve this request, Staff recommends a condition be added requiring the applicant to receive Final Design Approval for the power line location. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce .Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Open Public Hearing 4. Close Public Hearing 5 Commission Review 6 Commission Action Respectfully Submitted, Mary Holden Town Planner _'N 041 Planning and "ning Commission Staff Report October 4, 1994 T. J. Connor Building Special Review Use — Above Ground Power Lines to Building Lot 14-15, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions (K) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Datete�4__Sue A Resolution ing A Special Review Use/fo Al ow For Above Ground k. Power Lines Connecting To A Building On Lot 14/15, Block 1, Benchmark At Beaver Creek Subdivision, changing Condition Number 1 to state the power line location br_ approved by Staff. APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL REVIEW USE The unde,signed hereby requests that a SPECIAL REVIEW USE be granted in accordance with the terms of the Town of Avon Municipal Code. In support of this application, the undersigned states: 1. The Special Review Use requested is: �2wJ rJc, \V„F�ArJ GJUL1aE-AA o+a r�O�t --o P'Ope' $j.t 6 .3eyoupw.o.,� 2. Legal description of property: �,4 \ L-. t kill 3. Address of property is: "`9� ��t,g\{ �,c A.�c, ( 8J4t:O 4. Owner of described property: 5. Applicant for Special Review Use: 6. Zoning classification of property: 7. Existing improvements on property consist of: -) b—j O t S (e A.C�n T:h r 6�) ,,,_ o , - 8. Duration of proposed Special Review Use is: Permanent L.�/ Temporary Years 9. There is hereby attached a list of the names and addresses of all property owners within 300 feet of the property upon which the Special Use permit is requested, and the required notices for mailing and posting. 10. Additional comments: + \A ,ZAj A I do hereby certify that the above statements are true and correct and the application is signed as an acknowledgement of that fact. I am the owner of the above described property a horized to act as agent Bent for the owner. t� � Appl cant Owne pa. aQ�),&L( 6-o }Co Address one Numbe Address one Number Da d ed mountain properties associates Real Estate Sales • Management • Development 9/25/94 Avon Planning and Zoning Commission Special Review Committee Chairman Jack Hunn P.O. Box 975 Avon, Co. 81620 Re: Lot 15 and Lot 16 Block 1 Benchmark at Beaver Creek Dear Mr.Hunn This letter is regarding the electrical easement proposal to bring secondary power to Lot 15,Vail/Avon Commercial Park thur Lotl6, Avon Business Service Center. I will also address the problem we, at Lot 16, are having with the drainage and utility easement. between Lot 15 and Lot 16. Enclosed is a copy of a letter from Peter Sullivan, project manager for Lot 15, requesting an easement west of our building to allow their power to be buried underground. As you can see from the letter,there are no drawings,no specifics and no details. This easement cannot be granted blindly on this matter. Regarding the drainage and utility easement problem, I am enclosing a letter we sent to Mr. Bill James, Avon Town Manager. You can tell from the letter, we have been dealing with the problem of the drainage and utility easement between Lot 15 and Lot 16 for months now. We were assured, by the building department, Lot 15 had a drainage plan for between the two buildings. Thus far, we have been unable to obtain the plan and no work has been done between the two buildings. Our building,on Lot 16, was built in 1982. The construction was approvaled by the Town of Avon. The Town of Avon has not addressed any problems with the building since 1987, when this owner acquired the building. Between Lot 16 and Lot 15 we had landscaped and had a drainage ditch in place. Thi: is now all gone. The problem with drainage between the to lots is a strong concern of ours. page 1 108 s. frontage rd. w. . suite 307 . voil, colorado 81657 . 303/476-7450 0"►, mountain properties associates Real Estate Sales • Management • Development Enclosed is a letter from Larry Brooks,Director of Municipal Services for the Town of Avon. He states, "Avon is not responsible for privately held drainage easements". We believe the Town of Avon and the Avon Planning and Zoning Commission have a responsibility to property owners to control new building and their effect on established buildings. We would like to go on record ,for the reason stated above, that any problems with drainage caused by the construction on Lot 15, be the responsibility of the Town of Avon and the Avon Planning and Zoning Commission. 7 would like to reiterate that we have spent all summer trying to resolve this problem with Peter Sullivan, the project manager for Lot 15 and with the Town of Avon, all to no avail. We would appreciate your assistance in this matter. Please feel free to contact me. cc:chang cc:james cc:reynolds Sincerely, oyc'e Wilson Manager Avon Business Service Lot 16 476-2528 476--8837 FAX page 2 108 s, frontage rd. w. . suite 307 . vail, colorado 81657 . 303/476-7450 Ask, mountain properties associates ✓� z Real Estate Sales • Management • Development -1/29/94 Mr.Bill James Avon Town Manager 400 Benchmark Rd. Avon, Colorado 81620 Dear Mr. James, Please allow me to introduce myself. I am Joyce Wilson, representative for Avon Business Service Center, Limited Partnership. The partnership is the owner of Avon Business Service Center on Lot 16, Medcalf Road, Avon. This letter is to inform you of our concerns regarding the building being constructed on Lot 15, Medcalf Road, Avon. From the time construction started on Lot 15, May 1994, we have tried to analyze the drainage plan approved by The Town of Avon for T.J.Cor,nors, the developer of Lot 15. We have been unable to secure the approved drainage plan and specifications. Our main concern is that the water and runoff from Lot 15 will drain into our building and parking lot. The numerous discussions with Norm Wood, Mary golden, and Joe Mcgrath have not answered our questions about the drainage problem. We have gone to great length to solve thin drainage problem including hiring a construction consultant,an engineering firm and a lawyer. These expensive efforts have been to no avail. We now feel it necessary to leave the responsibility for the drainage between Lot 15 and Lot 16 up to the Town of Avon. We would like to go on rF-cord that any problems concerning the drainage between Lot 16 and Lot 15 will be the responsibility of the Town of Avon. Thank you for your time in this matter. S cerely,� Joyce Wilson Manager A.B.S.c. 476-2528 cc:chang 108 s. frontage rd. w. • suite 307 . vall, colorado 81657 . 303/476-7450 Town of Avon P.O. Box 975 Avon Colorado 81620 (303) 949-4280 September 15, 1994 Joyce Wilson Mountain Properties Associates 108 S Frontage Road West, Ste. 307 Vail, CO 81657 Dear Joyce We received your letter of July 29, and have completed a site review Please be advised that a 15' drainage easement exists (7.5' setback from either side of the property line separating Lot 15 and 16). It is the responsibility of the property owners of these two lots to work together to maintain this easement, which would originally have carried water and drainage to the public tight -of -way that exists on Metcalf Road. We say an easement that "would originally" have carried water to Metcalf Road for a specific reason This easement can no longer carry water to Metcalf Road in such a drainage swale because of the construction on Lot 16. The parking areas for the Avon Business Service Center have cut into the lower side of the drainage easement. This encroachment resulted in a gabion rock wall that retains the hillside At the north edge of both parking lots. The result of this design on Lot 16 is a drop in elevation and water flowing into your lot, rather than continuing along the easement to Metcalf Road, as was originally intended. The drainage situation described was created by the construction on Lot 16 (which encroaches in the drainage easement) and not the construction on Lot 15. September 15, 1994 Mountain Properties Associates Page 2 of 2 The Town of Avon, is not responsible for privately held drainage easements. Yyou feel that the situation created by the construction and site design of the Avon Business Service Center is unacceptable, your remedy is to hire someone to provide you with a solution for your site drainage. Sincerely, Larry Broo Director of Municipal Services Copy/File LB/mml Town of Avon P.O. Box 975 Avon, Colorado 81620 (303) 949-4280 September 15, 1994 Joyce Wilson Mountain Properties Associates 108 S Frontage Road West, Ste. 307 Vail, CO 81657 Dear Joyce. We received your letter of July 29, and have completed a site review Please be advised that a 1:-I drainage easement exists (7.5' setback from either side of the property line separating Lot 15 and 16). It is the responsibility of the property owners of these two lots to work together to, maintain this easement, which would originally have carried water and drainage to the public right-of-way that exists on Metcalf Road We say an easement that "would origina;ly'have carried water to Metcalf Road for a specific reason This easement can no longer carry water to Metcalf Road in such a drainage swale because of the construction on Lot 16. The parking areas for the Avon Business Service Center have cut into the !ower side of the drainage easement. This encroachment resulted in a gabion rock wall that retains the hillside at the north edge of both parking lots The result of this design on Lot 16 is a drop in elevation and water Flowing into your lot, rather than continuing along the easement to !Metcalf Road, as was originally intended The drainage situation described was created by the construction on Lot 16 (which encroaches in the drainage easement) and not the construction on Lot 15 W-jm September 15, 1994 Mountain Properties Associates Page 2 of 2 The Town of Avon is not responsible for privately held drainage casements. if you feel that the situation created by the construction and site design of the Avon Business Service Center is unacceptable, your remedy is to hire someone to provide you with a solution for your site drainage. Sincerely, Larry Brooi Director of Municipal Services Copy/File LB/mmi SEP -22-84 FRI 10:16 PM Q ___....._.._...._..___—...____________________ r - SEP -23-1794 11:29 FROM 1173 N.E. t 2,57H SREET StpR 600 McxrHnuvw, ncxrr asset mast 897 8440 fAK 1)031 2oM3 OoNbAc"s LICENSE. C& C ,02210 Cd IST. r 0JT, SFR). I f ;<. TO 133?490891277 P. 01 September 22, 1994 Re: Vail Arron Coetmervial park Me. Joyce Wilson Property Manager Dear Joyce, Last night at the meeting with the ;own Of Avon's Special Aoview Committee, the proposal to bring our secondary power overhead to the Vail/Avon Commercial Park was ntither denied nor approved. Their hesitance in making a decision was based on their requiring more information in regard to other alternatives that could be pursued. The utmost in their minds was the possibility of your granting an easement above your property, to the west, on the hillside where we would cut a road, trench, t,ury the electrical cable and then back fill thQ disturbance. wf: would, of Course, have to trench as well from Holy Crose's pad mount transformer, south of your north building to make this confection. This possibility was discussed with the committee. They were informed that, to safely keep away from your building, the road cut would have to be way up behind your building, on the hillside and the scouring of the topography would be evident from the road and would take a long time to revegetate itself. I informed the committee that I would present this proposal to you at the earliest date: The proposal being that S.S. Chang grant an easement west of your building on the hillside to allow us to bring our power to the building, underground. This conforms with the Town of Avon's desire to keep power lines underground on all new structures. If we do not hear from you by September 30, 1994, on this easement proposal, we will understand the,: you are denying our request and will inform the Review Committee at the meeting scheduled for October 4, 1994. sincerely, Peter Sullivan Project Manager CC: S.S. Chang i73 N.F. 113TH STRFFT 9M 600 rK11tIM tivonv, nvs" 33 101 13a 693 8440 FAX j3051602u163 CONrgAC S KEN%, CO CA02220 September 22, 1994 Re: Vail Aron CGi nrvl4l Pa -k Ms. Joyce wilson Property Manager DAar Joyce, bast night at the meeting with the :own of Avon's Special Review Committee, the proposal to bring our secondary power overhead to the Vail/Avon Commercial Park was neither denied nor approved. Their hesitance in making a decision was based on their requiring more information in regard to other alternatives that could be pursued. The utmost in their minds was the possibility of your granting an easement above your property, to the west, on the hillside where we would cut a road, trench, bury the electrical cable and then back fill the disturbance. We would, of Course, have to trench as well from Holy Cross's pad mount transformer, south of your north building to make this connection. This possibility was discussed with the committee. They were informed that, to safely keep away from your building, the road cut would have to be way up behind your building on the hillside and the scouring of the topography would be evident from the road and would take a long time to r^vegetate itself. I informed the committee that i would present this proposal to you at the earliest date: The proposal being that S.S. Chang grant an easement west of your building on the hillside to allow us to bring our power to the building, underground. This conforms with the Town of Avon's desire to keep power lines underground on all new structures. If we do not hear from you by September 30, 1994, on this easement proposal, we will understand that you are denying our request and will inform the Review Committee at the meeting scheduled for October 4, 1994. Sincerely, Peter Sullivan Project Manager CC: 9.9. Chang SEP -06-1994 03:53 T" P. 01 TOWN OF AVON PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 94 - 20 SERIES OF 1994 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SPECIAL REVIEW USE TO ALLOW FOR ABOVE GROUND POWER LINES CONNECTING TO A BUILDING ON LAT 14-15, BLOCK I, BENCHMARK AT BEAVER CREEK SUBDIVISION, TOWN OF AVON, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO WHEREAS, T. J. Connor has filed an application with the Town of Avon for approval of a Special Review Use to a!low for the installation of above ground power lines, on Lot 14-15, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek, Town of Avon, Eagle County, Colorado; and, WHEREAS, this location is zoned Industrial and Commercial, in which above ground utilities may be approved as a Special Review Use, and, WHEREAS, a public hearing has been held by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon, pursuant to notices required by law, at which time the applicant and the public were given an opportunity to express their opinions and present certain information and reports regarding the proposed Special Review Use, and Wt IEREAS, following such public hearing and consideration of such information as presented, the Planning and "Zoning Commission finds as follows A. The proposed use is consistent with the objectives and purposes of the comprehensive plan, and B. The proposed use is designed to be compatible with the surrounding land SERIES OF 1994 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SPECIAL REVIEW USE TO ALLOW FOR ABOVE GROUND POWER LINES CONNECTING TO A BUILDING ON LOT 14-I: , BLOCK 1, BENCHMARK AT BEAVER CREEK SUBDIVISION, TOWN OF AVON, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO WHEREAS, T. J. Connor has filed an application with the Town of Avon for approval of a Special Review Use to allow for the installation of above ground power lines, on Lot 14-i 5, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek, Town of Avon., Eagle County, Colorado, and; WHEREAS, this location is zoned Industrial and Commercial, in which above ground utilities may be approved as a Special Review Use, and, WHEREAS, a public hearing has been held by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon, pursuant to notices required by law, at which time the applicant and the public were given an opportunity to express their opinions and present certain information and reports regarding the proposed Special Review Use; and WHEREAS, following such public hearing and consideration of such information as presented, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds as follows A The proposed use is consistent with the objectives and purposes of the comprehensive plan, and B The proposed use is designed to be compatible with the surrounding land uses and newer uses in the area Ga NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon, Colorado, hereby approves a Special Review Use for the installation of above ground power line on Lot 14-15, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek, Town of Avon, Eagle County, Colorado, subject to the following condition: I. The power line location be approved by Staff. ADOPTED THIS DAY OF Secretary Chairman 1994 I. The power line location be approved by Staff ADOPTED THIS DAY OF 1994 Secretary Chairman PLANNING ATCU ZONING COMMISSION STAFF^PORT October 4, 1994 Lot 3, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision Mountain Coast Homes Variance - Building Height PROJECT TYPE: Four-plex ZONING: PUD COMPLIES WITH ZONING? No, Requires a Variance to Building Height Requirements This is a Public Hearing for a variance to the Building Height, on Lot 3, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision. INTRODUCTION: Michael Waste, on behalf of Mountain Coast Homes, is requesting a variance to the maximum building height of 35' allowed for Wildridge Subdivision STAFF COMMENTS: The building c -Implies with the height restrictions set forth in the Zoning Code, therefore. the variance request is not needed. STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND FINDINGS: Staff recommendation is for adoption of Resolution No. 94-21 which denies the requested variance from the maximum height limit of 35' RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1 Introduce Application 2 Applicant Presentation 3. Open Public Hearing 4 Close Public Hearing 5. Commission Re) ew 6 Commission .Action Respectfully submitted, Mary Holden "Town Planner PLANNING A,, 1) ZONING COMMISSION STAFF nEPORT October 4, 1994 Lot 3, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision Mountain Coast Homes Variance - Building Height PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted (X) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date___LD I d I QA- _Sue Since this project was now ij compliance wi h b ildin" ..eight requirements, the Commission approved Plannin and Zoning C mmi sion RE—so-Tu—tion 94--71—,-A Resolution Denying A Va,.•iance Fro he Bui ng H ight Requirements As Stiuniated in Title 17 of '' 0 11 Al 00% 11"%N APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE The undersigned hereby requests that a VARIANCE from the terms of the Town of Avon Municipal Code be granted. In support of this application, the undersigned states: 1. The specific variance requested is To allow the height of the building to exceed the 35'-0- 2. Legal description of property: Luta Block? WildridgrVjibldvicinn f•n,,..t.,Cif FAglp 3. Address of property: _ 2810 O'Neal Spur, Avon. Colorado 4. Owner of described property: Mountain Coast Homes S. Applicant for variance: Mountain Coast Homes 6. Zoning Classification of property: RLn 7. Existing improvements on property consist of None 8. The duration of the proposed variance is: Permanent X Temporary Years 9. The following practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship, inconsistent with the obJectives of the particular regulation would result from the strict, literal interpretation and enforcement of the regulation: A building whose massing_ because of a larger foot , nt and parallel to the front propem line would be of far greater impact to the adjacent property owners. 10. The following exceptional or extraordinary circumstances o: conditions applicable to the site do not apply generally to other properties in thce same zone district: —Fx'st nu_ai;-A+P s4PoIPPMAinl&F to the feenep epuer lin 11. The strict literal interpretation and enforcement o ,e :oecified regulation would deprive the applicant of the following privileges ;ef by the owners of other properties in the same district: The abilrt% to utilize a design Lha; Likes advantage e4 the existing grades, uuliucs.. and vies for more efficient and economical floor plan- with the least impact to the site r"1 TOWN OF AVON PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 94 - 21 SERIES OF 1994 A RESOLUTION DENYING A VARIANCE FROM THE BUILDr—G HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS AS STIPULATED IN TITLE 17 OF THE AVON MUNICIPAL CODE, FOR LOT 3, BLOCK 2, WILDRIDGE, TOWN OF AVON, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO WHEREAS, Michael Waste, owner of Lot 3 , Block 2, Wildridge, has applied for a variance from the maximum building height requirements as stipulated in Title 17, of the .Avon Municipal Code, and WHEREAS, a public hearing has been held by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the 'Town of Avon, pursuant to notices required by law, at which time the applicant and the public were given an opportunity to express their opinions and present certain information and reports regarding the proposed Building Height Variance application and has considered. I The relationship of the tequested variance to other existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity, 2. 'The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity, or to attain the objectives of this title without grant of special privilege, 3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety; I Such other fors and criteria as thy Commission deems applicable to the proposed -21 SERIES OF 1994 A RESOLUTION DENYING A VARIANCE FROM THE BUILDING HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS AS STIPULATED IN TITLE 17 OF THE AVON MUNICIPAL CODE, FOR LOT 3, BLOCK 2, WILDRIDGE, TOWN OF AVON, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO WHEREAS, Michael Waste, owner of Lot 3 , Block 2, Wildridge, has applied for a variance from the rnaximum building height requirements as stipulated in Title 17, of the Avon Municipal Code, and WHEREAS, a public hearing has been held by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon, pursuant t, notices required by law, at which time the applicant and the public were given an opportunity to express their opinions and present certain information and reports regarding the proposed Building Height Variance application and has considered' 1 The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and strictures in the vicinity, 2. The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity, or to attain the objectives of this title without grant of special privilege, 3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety, 4 Such other factors and criteria as the Commission deems applicable to the proposed variance. WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds: A. That the granting of the variance will constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties in the vicinity. B. That the granting of the variance could be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. C. That the variance, is not warranted for the following reasons: i. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the regulation would not result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title, ii. There are not exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the vicinity, iii. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would not deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties it the vicinity. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon, Colorado, hereby denies the requested variance from the building height regulation of Title 17 of the Avon Municipal Code for Lo! 3, Block 2, Wildridge, Town of Avon, Eagle County, Colorado. ADOPTED THIS DAY OF _ L �T>tvL1994 Secretary Chair #` welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the \ icinity. C. That the variance is not warranted for the following reasons: i. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcer ent of the regu!ation would not result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title, ii. There are not exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the vicinity, iii. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation wouid not deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the vicinity. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that to � Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon, Colorado, hereby denies the requested variance from the building height regulation of Title 17 of the Avon Municipal Code for Lot 3, Block 2, Wildridge, Town of Avon, Eagle County, Colorado. ADOPTED THIS Qtrt J_�_DAY OF vim_ _ 1904 Secretary r omm� PLANNING Av4D ZONING COMNI!SSION STAFF REPORT October 4, 1994 Lot 3, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision Fourplea Final Design Review PROJECT TYPE: Foiirplex ZONING: PUD, Fourplex COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES INTRODUCTION: Robert Kaufmann, on behalf of Mountain Coast Homes, has submitted an application for Final Design Review of a fourplex on Lot 3, Block 2, Wildridge. The lot, 1. 12 acres in size, and has slopes ranging from 31 to 55%. The building will contain three and one half levels. The building meets the 35' maximum height limit. The units will consist of the following materials: Materials Colors Roof G.A.F. - Timberline burnt sienna blend Siding horizontal tees- s;dins, natural Other stucco wheat field Fascia cedar green band Soffits cedar natural Window vinyl clad wood natural Wind-�w Trim cedar natural Door mstal green bank Door Trim cedar natural Hand/Deck Rails cedar natural Flues N/A Flashings metal natural Trash Enclosure wood natural/green bank A landscape plant list is attached to this report. REVIEW HISTORY The Commission reviewed this application at the May 17, 1994 meeting and commented on the following. • Building height r.nd how propose to lower; • Four identical units with no variation to window fenestration's, garage doors, etc.; • Use of decorative devices: • Identical not being acceptable, • South elevation maybe have heu vier trim wound windows; • Variations architecturally on multi -family attached homes looks tacky, PLANNING Ai -41) ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT October 4, 1994 Lot 3, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision F'ourplea Final Design Review • Steep lot; • Exposed foundations, • Stucco to grade; and • Individual trash pick up suggested due to dumpster locatic i and how functional location being. At the August 2, 1994 Commission meeting, this app'ication was tabled due to various concerns, on;, being building height. STAFF COMMENTS: Site Plan: ■ Finished slopes still exceed 2:1. ■ Design detail has not been provioed on the retaining walls, which appear to be as high as 10' in some locations. There is , note stating the wall face will contain stucco and color will match the builr.ng. ■ This project due to the steep nature of the site, will be required to place a construction and erosion control fence on the site prior to any site disturbance. ■ The landscape plan must meet the minimum standards which are 2" caliper for deciduc us trees, 6' minimum for coniferous and 5 gallon minimum for shrubs. DESIGN REVIEW CONSIDERATIONS: The Commission, shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of this project. Conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable regulations of the Town. The suitability of the improvement, `nciuding type and quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located. The compatik,...., 'the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties. The compatibility of the proposed improvements with site topography. The visual appearance of any proposed improvement as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties an public ways. PLANNING AmD ZONING COMMISSION STAFF KEPORT October 4, 1994 Lot 3, Block 2, W ildridge Subdivision Fourplea Final Design Review The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planing and 'Zoning Commission approve this request with the following conditions: I . The flues, flashings and vents be painted to match the color scheme of the bailding. 2. Revegetation include native bushes. 3. The landscape material meet the minimum Town of Avon standards. Meters be placed on the building. 5. Prior to any site disturbance, a construction/erosion control fence be placed on site. 6. Slopes may not be steeper than 2:1 (2 horizontal/l vertical). 7. All retaining walls over 4' high must be design by an Engineer. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Actioo Respectfully Submitted Mary Bolden Town Planner PLANNING A„D ZONING CON4MISSION STAFF mEPORT October 4, 1994 -,,t 3, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision Fourplea Final Design Review PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions (A Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date 10) 4 S Sue Railton, The flues, flashings and be painted td match the color scheme ns: 2. Revegetation include native bushes. 3. .1 o Tn of Avon standarcig rM ric The ar�se.�Pe�;,�t�r;-�,l -�;.ee1 the ��..� — 4. Meters be placed on the building. Prior to any site disturbance, a construction/erosicn control i "ce be placed or site. 6. Slopes may oot be steeper than 2:1 (2 horizontal/1 vertical). All re iron wails ovg-r-A 4 hign must be designed by an E11911luey 8. An automatic watering system be added and required. 9. The terraced area landscape be br)ught back to stafT with the recommendation that taller more varied trees and shrubs be put in that area to screen the wall. 10. That a 300 lb., three tab architectural shingle be used. 11. That solid„ cylindrical down lights be substituted for the globes that are now shown on the plan. 12. The colors and materials be brought back to the Commission for approval \ Native \. \\ Elec. Bax �f \ HB \ 2 Se OK06 / °C¢ / pp27 / Native ,0 Cable /'�, Entry Sign I•Native \oma \ 6' Qom. .0 r r i l c� ; #4 / 5 ` ` r Existing shrubs to remain ` J shrubs to remain This Area This Area IM / Limit of Soy Shrub '- This s to r pp Are0 em a') '- 2 GJ ` 6' l— Revegetate all disturbed on native shrubs, typical Limits of Site Disturbance 15,0" Oftsct, typical. i Y 0 U 1 O D_ _ z 03 00 ,zt Ln N Ln Q z m zz �� U mm W oo mm C:d N U U I (� 00 op w 00 I '� c\i co C N z � w Lij � z CL) z -- 4 D n m 'bz < _ � Z o m� <(h u z w �, 0 0 o Q z m � ? z w� h0l < Q LU Q �Q z c� mn F* C_� -D it L L� <Z m �+I, < J � n2 0= y ,� v `__ � � • . Y' ' s ' '\ _ � P 9 W � AW L" 1 T. f s L" 1 T. f Q a 0 1 j , l PLANNING Aril ZONING COMMISSION STAFFfnPORT October 4, 1994 Lot 3, Block 3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Westgate Building Final Design Review -Master Sign Program PROJECT TYPE: Master Sign Program ZONING: PUD COMPLIES WITH ZONING? Yes INTRODUCTION Larry Rst has submitted an application requesting approval of a Master Sign Program for the Westgate Building. Attached is the proposed Master Sign Program for the building. STAFF COMMENTS The proposal is with keeping of the Sign Code with the exception of two freestanding signs and the location of the freestanding sign along Beaver Creek Blvd. The Sign Code does nr` allow for two freestanding signs per lot and freestanding signs must be located at least 10' from the property line. "Sign Guidelines" and review criteria from the Sign Code Section 15.28.060 S:en Design Guidelines A. Harmonious with Town Scale. Sign location, configuration, design, materials, and colors should be harmonious with the existing signs on the structure, with the neighborhood, and with the townscape. B. Harmonious with Building Scale. the sign should be harmonious with the building scale, and should not visually dominate the structure to which it belongs or call undue attention to itself. C. Materials. Quality sign materials, including anodized metal; routed or sandblasted wood, such as rough cedar or redwood, interior -lit, individual Plexiglas -faced letters; or three dimensional individual letters with or without indirect lighting, are encouraged. Sign materials, such as printed plywood, interior -lit box -type plastic, and paper or vinyl stick -on window signs are discouraged, but may be approved, however, if determined appropriate to the location, at the sole discretion of the Commission. D. Architectural Harmony. The sign and its supporting structure should be in harmony architecturally, and in harmony in color with the surrounding structures. E. Landscaping. Landscaping is required f'or all free-standing signs, and should be designea Lo enhance the signage and surrounding building landscaping. .PLANNING A ZONING COMMISSION STAFF ZPORT October 4, 1994 Lot 3, Block 3, Benchmark at B,.,ver Creek Westgate Building Final Design Review -Master Sign Program F. Reflective Surfaces. Reflective surfaces are not allowed. G. Lighting. Lighting should be of no greater wattage than is necessary to make the sign visible at night, and should not reflect unnecessarily onto adjacent properties. Lighting sources, except neon tubing, should not be directly visible to passing pedestrians or vehicles, and should be concealed in such a manner that direct light does not shine in a disturbing manner. H. Location. On multi-stoiy buildings, individual business signs shall generally be limited to the ground level. Section 15.28.070 - Sign Design Review Criteria In addition to the sign Design Guidelines fisted above, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall also consider the following criteria while reviewing proposed sign designs: A. The suitability of the improvement, including materials with which the sign is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located: Comment The proposed sign is consistent with the Town's Sign Design Guidelines. B. The nature of adjacent and neighboring improvements: Comment: The sign materials are consistent with allowed signs on adjacent and neighborin ; buildings. C Tae quality of the materials to be utilized in any proposed improvement. Comment: T he quality of the proposed sign materials arc acceptable. D The visual impact of any proposed improvement as viewed from any adjacent or neighboring property: Comment The visual impact of these proposed improvements will be consistent with existing area signs E. The objective that no improvement will be so similar or dissimilar to other signs in the vicinity !hat va:ues, monetary o- aesthetic , will be impaired Comment: The proposal meets thl- intent of this criteria CAS PLANNING A ZONING COMMISSION STAFk _SPORT October 4, 1994 Lot 3, Block 3, Benchmark at Beaver Crcek Westgatr Building Final Design Review -Master Sign Program F. Whether the type, height, size, and/or quantity of signs generally complies with the sign code and appear to be appropriate for the project: Comment. The type, size and location of the proposed signs generally comply with the Sign Code, however, the two proposed freestanding signs do not comply with the Sign Code. G. Whether the sign is primarily oriented to vehicular or pedestrian traffic, and whether the sign is appropriate for the determined orientation. Comment: These signs are primarily orient.:d toward vehicular traffic. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Planning and Zoning approve this application with the following condition: I Only one freestanding sign is allowed for this properly 2. The freestanding sign a located at least 10' frons the property line. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. haroduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action R::spect'jlly Submitted Mai y ; wbJen Town Planner PLANNING A .D ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT October 4, 1994 Lot 3, Slock 3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Westgate Building Final Design Review -Master Sign Program PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions (Y) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date I oASue Railton 4Ik Wr Nq with the following conditio 1. uniy one treestanainq sign alto e8 for this property. 2. The freestanding sign be locate at least 10 from the property line. 3=—Eo�orrbe-brought-bark-for-approval-.- 4. Landscape plan for the monument sign be brought back for approval. • 77 COMPREHENSIVE SIGNAGE PICOGRAM WESTGATE OFFICE/ RETAIL 13UILDING AVON,COLORADO SEPTEMBER, 1994 SUMMARY OF SIGNAGE: 1. BUILDING IDENTIFICATION Illuminated monument sign- south west corner of property 2. FIRST FLOOR TENANT SIGNAGE Units 101- '114 Illuminated pan channel letters attached to perforated metal panels, with raceways on rear of panel. Unit 105 Illuminated pan chamiel letters attached to top of t ' south portion of building. 3. SECOND FLOOR TENANT SIGNAGE Not permitted. 4. DIRECTORY List of tenants- driveway entryway See following for complete details. All signage will require approval of the condominium association, as well as that of the Town of Avon. M BUILDING IDENTIFICATION Monument sign to be a double sided, internally illuminated cabinet sign with a routed metal face, placed on rock and berm base. Only copy to be illuminated. See exhibits I -A, 1-B. FIRST FLOOR TENANTS Illuminated signage• Units 101-104• Single space tenants First floor tenants are permitted signage above the storefronts as shown in exhibit 2-A. If a space is occupied by a single busine that tenant will be permitted one 2' x 8' signface. If the space is subdivided, or occupied by more than one tenant, the second 2' x 8' signface may be used for the additional business. A tenant that occupies more than one space may have a maximum of two 2' x 8' signs over their space. Each tenant is required to have a conforming sign. See 2-D for unit details. The copy portion of the signfaces may utilize a maximum of 16 square feet, see exhibit 3-A. Logos, which will be an illuminated cabinet sign, may constitute a maximum of 40% of the sign square footage allowed. Typestyles shall be at the tenant's discretion, subject to the condominium association approval and limited stroke to permit UL label signs The main portion of the signage- which includes the tenant business name will be illuminated pan channel letters. Up to 40% of the allowed square footage may be dedicated to the nature of the business. This copy may be illuminated as pan channel letters (colors to match main text), or be an illuminated cabinet sign, text, trim and return to be matching green, and the face to be ivory plex. All illuminated signfaces shall have forest green sides and trim to match the building trim, with translucent ivory acrylic faces, similar to translucent plex #2146. All electrical signage shall be UL labeled. 3 A*W, C Subdivided or shared space - A maximum of two signfaces shall be used by the two or more business. Limits as to materials, logos, and nature of the business shall be the same as above. Two or more spaces for one tenant: A maximum of two signfaces may be used by a tenant occupying more then one space (101-104). A maximum of 50% of the total square footage allowed (if the two signfaces are used), may be used for the nature of the business. (Exhibit 2-13). Unit 105: The occupant of space 105 will have pan channel letters and logo box cabinet signs, similar to above in color and percentage limitations as above, but with a total square footage limitation of 30 square feet, see exhibit 3-A. Placement will be centered left/right and up down, to utilize the 30 square feet, as shown in exhibit 3-B. Window signage: First floor tenants shall be permitted window signage in accordance with the then current Town of Avon sign code (subject to condomieium association approval) Rear door signage: First floor tenants may place the suite number and business name on the rear entry door. The signs shall be a maximum of 2 square feet in size, and may be vinyl graphics or Other non -illuminated materials at the tenants choice, subject to condominium association approval. Temporary signage: First floor tenants may utilize temporary signage of tan vinyl banners with green copy, similar to the permanent illuminated signage, to be placed over the permanent sign area during the period of construction of approved signage. This may be in place a maximum of 60 days. All sale and special event signs, and other temporary signage require approval of the condominium association, and must be in conformity of the Town of Avon sign code. 3 a SECOND FLOOR TENANTS a No signage is permitted for second floor tenant. This prohibition includes building signs and window signs. DIRECTORY An illuminated tenant directory shall be placed at the location shown in exhibit 4-13. The directory shall be fabricated from green painted aluminum, with slide -in panels. The copy shall be translucent green in an ivory field. (See exhibit 4-A) GENERAL All improvements will be maintained by the tenant. If the tenant does not maintain the improvements, the condominium association will have the right to perform such work, if not done by the tenant in a timely or professional manner, and lien the property for all cost incurred. All workmanship and specifications will comply with all applicable government regulations. The cost of obtaining permits, approvals and drawings will be that of the tenant. kv SIGN DRAWING P.O. BOX 2088 . VAIL, CO 81 658 . 303.949.4565 . FAX: 303.949.4670 G'9Lv/LS�- PANTONE 454C PANTONE 342C '�N —rZi, + (Zfi UnN S C'£kAzT' G��a1, Simi/rt.L -Z7 64v 4, D,�,� JOB # DATE I d BY--- J -- aE T CLIENT �/1��S,r4 ATS __ CONTACT_ r7 �1 %k NEUANi/�) SCALE PHONE FAX: a HIGH iMo SIGNS WoMmommummorimp on a SIGN DRAWING P.O. BOX 2688. VA1L, CO 81 658 .303.949.4565 FAX: 303.949.4670 �YlocvvmEN7 Al 24'n/ n7C � Fac E a sia,c s GrzEEa me m- FrtF RoJ- CT, ttkf _/aany PICK �mou(GQu[� (C�NU[�� Nail /3ui4n, vq N4Mc S,,lJ.c7" t VE JOB #—_.- DATE -9A8 ? BY e!t�: CLIENT ' ??S- �/J-T� v lr_ / SCALE I/_ PHONE - U 6cwr�� r7Z711Zi7- -1- -'- --- A/E-Z-10 14;rT -- CONTACT- JQM ■f• g• [40 i 4 601 «emmom. . SIGN DRAWING P.O. BOX 2688. V,dJL, CO 8165o . 303.94 9.4565. FAX: 303.949.4670 vz�ot�', i CD i 6rLy a JOB#__ DATE-eLo�, 4-- __--- — CLIENT W 6/. r` CONTACT- �'V�L I✓ (/,C%�/t SCALE PHONE FAX:_ 004 =�%-JSICNS SIGN DRAWING P.O. BOX 2688 . VAIL, CO 81658 .303.949.4565 . FAX: 303.949.4670 S�Ny / S� ✓ �kfrm�6/ f _ �� /4hfm vm ni EDHQ��IIlInIIIL IJ3 PD (0� J) =� itAL EI'll 7b•x PAN Ck-".V4 mv� of. 1, er tuns )E7)r14-/(31 % uy JOB # _ DATE_$_ BY_ q�E rr � CLIENT �t/2fiG CONTACT� AQ SCALE _ PHONE r A� • [f! lob -= IECSIGNS .. r- 6� SIGN DRAWING P.O. BOX 2688. VAIL, CO 81658. 303.949.4565 . FAX. 303.949.4670 2� ag�a4oaad Qar�cJ o - C�OL��]�Q�C�d 9pG°�Opf��4� L/m/ Ti17- IIV �4x . 2 .5yv4A-c FS -j �l'f%%i/2< a If oC jw,9d vest /� - w_"v t/ih a�/ . JOB 1t DATE 9 Sy BY CUENT-���_— CONTACT 2�i�i&_,oS e q��o SCALE_____ PHONE FAX:-- 044 2 0 V z H Lo 0 A% i 441N El WASTGATE EXHIBIT 2-D UNIT NUMBER 101 102 103 104 ACTUAL NUMBER OF SIGN PANELS 1 2 3 2 NUMBER OF PANELS USABLE FOR SINGLE TENANT 1 1 2 NUMBER OF PANELS USABLE FOR MULTITENANT 1 2 3 2 I s" === �= TmCIONSIGNS .. �s SIGN DRAWING P.O. BOX 2688 . VAIL, CO 81658. 303.949.4565 . FAX: 303.949.4670 :5� cTc 1-r l/as�- S/�iv iit4mres- 141 ?A,j c4.. NJ Le VT1r1 i Z A,15' - 3o Aj -NH E�7n ooa IN l.�.I /�nm/on Qe V L 5 (M -DU W Ill'N LS 1l ,, DD 3 ikIi = 31JAd yo�Jy�an� J A/E 2 ��/GsT 6ft7�" -. CLIENT__ CONTACT ot,L I /1 45'k / to SCALE_ PHONE FAX: — z oz� a v � � z Q om itI 111 . • m N a 0 1V v 1 Z T V iLU 0 m a N r-, �� gg f ��-------------- 1 o II I b i y1� I to vo 0 ors 40 qft qp TECHSIGNS PENOMMIR.. w SIGN DRAWING P.O. BOX 2688 . VAIL, CO 81658. 303.949.4565. FAX: 303.949.4670 '%jrJniv�`IJiR � L�"9n /N7Y2*V,YLG i..crM�r�p CR;5iNE7- s j,J ` 51(04 cyt (D tis f �(�eoa gc� tchfllN� P-E�FE�RRE�D REAL ESIAIE I HAIR &NAIL SALOtI JOOE 011RAMNES AURANT x147`6 ., Q01l-7 s SuBJ6cj f uoay PIeA D 4VEY �H � HO�.M ,�votiy Ply LAS7CD AWGCEADV/EIRTILS.If:G_ ----_- -- A— f .3 /r VP D l �7Y4 JOB # _ DATEAL lt BY NEZjn nf CLIENT w� r6 CONTACT 'L &)kLAARAa SCALE 00 a _=� fECHSIGNS .. 0 SIGN DRAWING P.O. BOX 2688. VAIL, CO 81658. 303.949.4565. FAX: 303.949.4670 u 3 SPACES I 1 I JOB lJ------ GATE A/E___ r1s CLIENT "'WSJ ii�—A— � ��� CONTACT SCALE FAX: A*N r PLANNING Ai, L) ZONING COMMISSION STAFF.,iPORT October 4, 1994 Lot 3, Block 3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Westgate Building Final Design Review -Modification PROJECT TYPE: Commercial ZONING PUD COMPLIES WITH ZONING? Yes INTRODUCTION Elk Meadow, Inc. has submitted an application requesting approval of a modification to the rear elevation. The modification is the addition of windows. .Attached is the approved rear elevation and proposed rear elevation. STAFF COMMENTS Stall' would like the Commission to comment on the spacing of the proposed windows in relation to the spacing of the other windows. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Should the Commission approve this request, Staff has no conditions to recommend RECOMMENDED ACTION: I Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3 Commission Review 4 Commission Action Respectfully Submitted Mary Holden Town ^lanner r. PLANNING Ai - D ZONING COMMISSION STAFF r.EPORT October 4, 1994 Lot 3, Block 3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Westgate Building Final Design Review -Modification PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions (X) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( Date10� 4 'f _Sue Railton,,Soeretary t\ the back of the building, ex4pt for the cllear tory. ry I mm 41 IjI'J M ILL, l � � Ft Sg`� Y 3 l� I mm 41 IjI'J M ILL, l � r •yJP NLtL11iIIJ; i � € � i Hill llilll1l ' f — u ,.S4 111110 PLANNING Aft ZONING COMMISSION STAFF ..EPORT October 4, 1994 Lot 86, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision Hale Duplex Conceptual Design Review PROJECT TYPE: Duplex ZONING: PUD -2 Units COMPLIES WITH ZONING" YES INTRODUCTION: Hale Development has submitted plans for conceptual design review of a duplex for Lot 86, Block 4, Wildridge, which is 90 acres. The site slopes to the south at approximately 30-40%. The duplex will contain two levels. The residence will consist of the following materials Materials Color Roof asphalt Rustic Redwood Siding Scrib logs Natural Spruce Other Stucco Palais White Fascia 2x10 cedar Natural Spruce Soffits 2x6 t&g " Window clad casement bronze Window Trim I x4 cedar Natural Spruce Door 4 Panel Pine Natural Spruce Door frim Ix4 cedar Natural Spruce Hand/ Deck Rail 3" logs Natural Spruce Flues Type "B" Vent pipe Flashings Galvanized Chimnev stucco Palais White The landscape plan consists of 4 blue spruce at 6-8' high, 6 aspen at 2" caliper, and 5 aspen at 3" caliper 1250 square feet of sod is proposed with revegetation consisting of' top soil and native grasses Irrigation is proposed STAFF COMMENTS: A site plan has not been submitted. therefore, Staff may not comment on grading, drainage or site layout However, Staff would like to remind the applicant of the building setbacks that must be respected, which are 25' for the front etback, 10' for the side setback, and 10' for the rear setback The landscape plan, which is blown up from the site plan, indicates a structure in the front yard setback PLANNING A— ZONING COMMISSION STAFF ..SPORT October 4, 1994 Lot 86, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision Hale Duplex Conceptual Design Review Revegetation of the utility cuts and site disturbance must include native bushes, in addition to native grass and wildflower mix. This may be done through the landscape plan, which can include native bushes The applicant will have to work out Engineering concerns, should they arise. The design of the duplex is similar to the other duplex that Hale Development is currently building. The applicant has indicated the material for the flues and flashings, but no color. Thrz flues, flashings, and vents must have a finished surface STAFF RECOMMENDATION: As a conceptual, Staff has no recommendation. RECOMMENDED ACTION: I. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Mar} Holden Town Planner n u PLANNING A., J ZONING COMMISSION STAFF ..SPORT October 4, 1994 Lot 86, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision Hale Duplex Conceptual Design Review PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Adproved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ()c ) Date_ s}�q 4_ Sue Railton, S�r tary C1 At�t �0N As.a conceptual design review /no formal cti n as taken at this time. The Commission had many concerns egar ing e si t anzl—entryiurrtttt-r roject. 7�zl �1i1tt Ilk