The URL can be used to link to this page

PZC Packet 080294PLANNING AN sy ZONING COMMISSION STAFF !._,PORT August 2, 1994 Lot 43, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision Bober Residence Condition of Approval -- Landscape Plan and Roof Material PROJECT TYPE: Single Family Residence ZONING: PUD COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES INTRODUCTION: Mr. Andrew Bober has submitted a revised landscape plan and a roof material sample as required by his condition ofapprovai. STAFF COMMENTS The roof sample will be provided at the meeting. The original landscape plan included the fc!lowing material: Spruce 4 5.7 - .Aspen 8 2" caliper Spirea 8 5 gallon Mugho Pine 3 5 gallon The proposed landscape plan is included in your packet. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: As a condition of approval, Staff has no recommendation. RECOMMENDED ACTION: I Introduce Application 2 Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4 Commission Action Respectfully submitted, -fy�IN, - Mary Holden Town Planner PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF k—PORT August 2, 1994 Lot 43, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision Bober Residence Condition of Approval -- Landscape Plan and Roof Material PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted (✓) 'kpproved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with inodified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date z / Sue Railton, Secretary v f This item was part of the approved Consent aqenda. �n�Y. cor✓.MoN tilAME TI TTI SIZE ¢ter tnr�kS OF-CIOUOUS T2EE.S 11Z I cauAxlwc, A5FE-i�4 cyE12G f2�.�. N 'Tt2E�S 8 1 2': �4 L. I �,L 4 Pa., LhuoSCti,PliJG / 12F- iI=G,ETLTIa-L tLOTEs (. GO WTa-hC -f'o2 IILL F110vIpE"n�=COIL. .7EEr), �5 pjLLIE 7G2l:GE I til � f' g OR G,Q 47rR- aK 2.Oc.eY M0uNTIA1J !) r2 c4E 2. nuY EXIsTI�c, 5�✓zu»:. -� �E,a„��, .�-I,cLL.. a�='�'-��TE,� ,vITH s��u�Er� µny P-;4ILs. "�ELIC�uOUS 5�I12U�S C47- of 1 4 cuaJ2nuT Is sc�� \V R, �Vi.!�YZC.2�Ei1K�v�oip 5G/aL P GOL0Fw4F-7rL Pk!TE�ILL& 5 S u�L Q -T r2Eo 7\\r lc, ccc, \\r000 PE:af—= ►.11AL Gt2OcJ►!YS �ptE2S 55 SUOW -lkj- 5UMKE12 'LSO :.'' 12" o- (5; 2SS6ES �47UCK� P-,LUE CQASS IPCX� ry,�ivE G.f2hSS yQp S.F- SEED Qr2oLlw0 COVEQ_ Paer�x htu�cl-t LhuoSCti,PliJG / 12F- iI=G,ETLTIa-L tLOTEs (. GO WTa-hC -f'o2 IILL F110vIpE"n�=COIL. .7EEr), STVLA\V MULLH 1�1 ALL IOf S7Ul2le;F-D PLUS JUTE EY205101�4 !G.IT110L MLAT, 1"I /!�/2EA'ii OF 2:1 SLOPE OR G,Q 47rR- fOa OIL 6TnabILIznrlOti . 2. nuY EXIsTI�c, 5�✓zu»:. -� �E,a„��, .�-I,cLL.. a�='�'-��TE,� ,vITH s��u�Er� µny P-;4ILs. �, tiATIvE GLASS mixTLr2E j-0 PIE �PaEn✓� kT C47- of 1 FDL'u✓J f�F-& 1000 s.F to= PLANNING AN ZONING COMMISSION STAFF ►.PORT August 2, 1994 Lot 5, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Winsor Duplex Final Design Review -Roof Material Change PROJECT TYPE: Duplex ZONING RD -- Residential Duplex COMPLIES WITH ZONING" YES INTRODUCTION: Ray and Kim Winsor and Louis Von Ohlsen have submitted an application requesting approval of a roof material change to their duplex Thev are proposing Celotex, Presidential Series, Asphalt Shingles in the Weathered Wood color. The existing roof is cedar shake shingles. STAFF COMMENTS: Staff has no comments concerning this request STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Commission approve this application as presented RECOMMENDED ACTION: I Introduce Application Applicant Presentation 3 Commission Review 4 Commission Action Respectfully submitted, -'M &' l' Mary Holden Town Planner PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF &..PORT August 2, 1994 Lot 5, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Winsor Duplex Final Design Review -Roof Material Change PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted (4 Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continu, I ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action Date �, /�Sue Railton, Secretary_—,)(," X �~ filIn i , . • •. , „ , PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF .k PORT August 2, 1994 Lot 8, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision Simon Residence Final Design Review -Modifications PROJECT TYPE: Single Family Residence ZONING: PUD COMPLIES WITH ZONING) YES INTRODUCTION: Mr. Marvin Simon has submitted an application requesting various site and design modification to his approved residence. The modifications include: I Retaining wall material change to a dry stack utilizing native rocks; 2 Landscape plan revisions; and 3. Material change from half siding and half stucco to all stucco. STAFF C'OMMENT'S: This residence received Final Design Review approval on September 7, 1993 with 8 conditions of approval, which are attached to this Staff Report. The retaining wall has been removed the 7.5' Utility/Drainage easement. The revised landscape plan has reduced the number of Bristle cone Pine from '6 to 7 and a caliper is indicated, not height. As shown on the attached elevations, the material will be all stucco STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval with the following conditions: 4 The landscape material meet the minimum Town of Avon stand2rds, 1vhich include a minimum height of 6' for coniferous trees, and 2" caliper minimum for deciduous trees RECOMMENDED ACTION: I. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT August: 2, 1994 Lot 8, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision Simon Residence Final Design Review -Modifications Respectfully submitted, Mary Holden Town Planner PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( } Date Sue Railton, Secretary ticG 67-7- Since some of the changes proposed at this meeting had not been given to Staff for review, the Commission tabled this item for further Staff Review MAF=-tiJ' = N ]F_: _ S 1 M1 N July 14, 1994 Town of Avon Avon, CO 81620 Design review was approved by the Town of Avon Planning and Zoning Commission on September 2, 1993, subject to 8 conditions. The en.^losed Site Plan, Floor plans, and Front elevation include slight changes from the approved plan in response to suggestions from the Commission. Basically, the Front retaining wall has been removed and replaced by a low dry stack wall consisting of native rock. The handicapped use bedroom has been moved to the Front to provide better access and views. The required conditions have been or shall be met as Follows: 1. Th northwest retaining wall is 10 feet From the lot line and therefore does not extend into the utility easement. 2. All structural retaining walls shall be designed by a licensed engineer For approval by the Town engineer. 3. The Town engineer shall approve the drainage, driveway design, and culverts. 4. The roofing material shall not be less than 300#. S. The site plan submitted herewith indicates that the front driveway wall, most visible from the street, shall consist of a native rock dry stack. b. All utility meters shall. be located on the east side of the covered guest parking, as indicated on the site plan, and should not be visible From the street. 7. The address, 5756, shall be clearly visible From the street, as indicated on the site plan. B. The schedule of landscape materials is listed on the site plan. The terraces north of the building provide additional opportunity For planting trees, Flower`s, shrubs, and!or native grasses. I look forward to commencing construction quickly to permit building enclosure before the winter snow and storms. Respeptfully submitted, 1453 BIRCH STREET - DENUER; COLORADO 80220-2429 - (303) 377-2870 PS 4K SURVEYING, INC. co eo,zs )T7 . n Praject Creat: -I// Scale /✓ t Scale 1 ^ �O 1cD Number Datr: .'O '" :ef NumDe•: DESIGN REVIEW APPROVED BY: Town of Avon lanning and 7pning Commission Date; ...... ....... ? Chairman: ....)ie ( ) As S b(><With oic thru ... ....... P......... below 1. The northwest retaining wall not extend into the 7.5 root utility easement. 2. Any structural retaining wall must be engineered by applicant and approved by the Town Engineer prior to issuance of a building permit. 3. Final site drainage, driveway design and culverts must be approved by the Town engineer Prior to the issuance of a.building permit. ^ The asphalt roofing material be a minimum of 300#. �. The final design and material selection of the retaining vialls be brought back to the Commission for approval. 5. The meters be located on the house and screened from view. 7. The location of the address be indicated when they bring back the retaining walls for approval. 8. The schedule of the landscape materials be revised as discussed. of I n (• la o� -k; ys •may o \� r i A4 1 0 95 76 tA-17 Q .� .�. � , - r ,t ay �,: 9;. ]`�, y ,\ ��` _ .. �" 3 r M� PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT August 2, 1994 Lot 11, Block 5, Wildridge Subdivision Wildwood Townhomes Final Design Review -Modifications PROJECT TYPE: Townhomes ZONING: PUD COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES INTRODUCTION: Patrick and Susan O'Connor, have submitted an application requesting Design Review Approval to retain an existing fence at their unit in Wildwood Townhomes. The fence is 6' wide and 4' tall and made of redwood in a lattice pattern. STAFF COMMENTS: The attached pictures show the location of the fence and how it appears. Commission should consider whether or not this type of fence is architecturally compatible with the Wildwood To,wnhonies, STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Should the Commission approve this request, Staff has no condit;,)ns of approval. RECOMMENDED ACTION: I. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Revi.-w 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, 44 0—( - Mary Holden Town Planner PLANNING OWN ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT August 2, 1994 Lot 11. Block 5, Wildridge Subdivision Wildwood Townhomes Final Design Review -Modifications PLANNING AND ZONING ACT ION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date 2 Sue Railton, Secretary -- Its l a s Y' +, a } PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF kEPORT August 2, 1994 Lot 54, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision Olson Residence Firal Design Review Modification of Color PROJECT TYPE: Single Family Residence ZONING: PUD COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES INTRODUCTION: Mr. Olson has submitted a revised body and trim color for his residence on Lot 54, Block 3, Wildridge The proposed colors are a gray body with white trim. STAFF COMMENTS Staff has no comments concerning this request. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval as presented. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, ' l(?, -A Y 4C Mary Holden Town Planner PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF kEPORT August 2, 1994 Lot 54, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision Olson Residence Final Design Review Modification of Color PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted () Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual. No .Action ( ) Date/q9 Sue Railton, Secretary PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF KEPORT • August 2, 1994 • K 4 Lot 5 & 11, Block 5, Wildridge Subdivision Wildwood Townhomes Final Design Review -Modifications PROJECT TYPE: Townhomes ZONING: PUD COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES INTRODUCTION: Mr. Neal Healer, of the. Wildwood Townhomes, has submitted an application requesting Design Review Approval to place roofs over the second story decks of the Wildwood Townhomes North and South. All materials and colors will match the existing. STAFF COMMENTS: Clarification is needed on whether all units must have the roof addition or if it is an option for the owners. If the roofs are an optional, Staff questions how the roof additions would appear should only a few owners decide to pursue the option. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommendation is for approval if the roofs are not optiona; and all units will have the roofs added and there be no bare metal on the roofs. 1 Introduce Application 2 Applicant Presentation 3 Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, _/Y�Wc"r Mary Holden Town Planner RECOMMENDED ACTION: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF kEPORT August 2, 1994 Lot 5 & 11, Block 5, Wildridge Subdivision Wildwood Townhomes Final Design Review -Modifications PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted (,/) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date2 /Sue Railton, Secretary This item was approved as part of the consent agenda 1 v 6 4 • Y � • K l I ��a o u I f�EMova EX l,�:5rlklbr +�I NGr To AU G kI K� 12 I IJSTA I—L.b.�' I c7 jw fV 5++ y�iT M Fi7"Al� F LAS+ I I I.1Gr Zy x ` 4.T ALL -5 ail I> W PN=' P.rzOur lrD 1,. CoF-fri Erns 12 1 P ->ITL, Tt-1,t,NE EISIT112E 515 pIL>eWL7 F� I �GiL P.IJI� xTF�ID L►I� -4" A -r fiL,L jZ) I r:?.c ROOF::I N4 2 x Co LFi C�GrE2 -IA I� W I ) �AT FSA, I::xIST STU r� �I M ScF.J +#At�IGr�l2s \ 12 DzYE IZ v�N 7- al�v E �� Fr�1..TS - I F, 3� 2x Co 3tT WI SIN; F�sahl UC2�• 3 i j�' y I�ELIL AT INTFiRIfs2 T- T�I t REMc��E 51C�1� I �ISTPl� f3I TU 71-F1V.1 S, �VN EI- -rI I2E RGt0r-_ I�Euc- �,r.rrJ ExT•�+.1r�?tN' Ul��Ir�Ek1>�,i.�L�S �- 2 '�+�•�T METv.L� FLASH_ lo''k7k" �� L 51 r��kla.t,l.•S �JJ 1� W ra.A,I�P�r� I Z" — EirI�I tiles i t IL t5 -No Zr To -_ cX IST I �U I r��kiAl..l.� CZ r All PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF.PORT August 2, 1994 Lot 12-11, Filing 1, Englebend Subdivision Wilkinson Fence Final Design Review- Modification PROJECT TYPE: Resid.:ntial ZONING: PUD COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES INTRODUCTION: Mr. Roger Wilkinson is requesting approval of a 3.83' high, cedar, split rail fence to be placed LLlong his north, south and west property lines. The split rail fence will have a green metal mesh fencing. STAFF COMMENTS: Fences are addressed in the Procedures, Rules and Regulations of the Planning and Zoning Commission, Section 6.24, Miscellaneous Items: B. Fences and Signs: 1. "Fences, walls, or ,imilar type barriers shall have separate approval of the Commission, except that functional or decorative fences or walls may be approved as an integral part of a building design. Wood fences are generally pore acceptable than metal. Limited use of fences is encouraged;" The placement of the fence takes in the entire back yard, including the Metcalf Ditch and utility/drainage easements. Does the Commission feel this is a limited use a fence? STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission approve the application with the following conditions 1. The fence be located out of all easements. 2. The proposed fenced area be reduced, as shown on the "Recommended Fence Location" map attached to this report. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3 Comrr.;ssion Review 4. Commission Action OW4 .-, PLANNING AN J ZONING COMMISSION STAXF .-"PORT August 2, 1994 Lot 12-B, Filing 1, Eaglebend Subdivision Wilkinson Fence Final Design Review- Modification Respectfully submitted, Mari Holden Town Planner PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ✓) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date Sue Railton, SecretaryA �^— This item was approved by the Commission with the following conditions: 1. The fence be located out of all easements. 2. The proposed fenced area be reduced, as shown on the Recommended Fence Location map attached to this report W RE: PROPOSED FENCING 4422 EAGLEBEND DRIVE, AVON I am submitting the attached information to the Design/Review Committee. I am requesting z. building permit to install a standard 2 rail split rail fence at the above address - east side of the duplex. Attached ILC is marked in yellow for the location of proposed fence. Fence to be a cedar, 2 rail spilt rail fence material. Post is be approximately 62" long and should be about 46 inch out of the ground when installed. Rails are standard 10 ft length with the top rail to be approximately 40" from the ground. I would like to install on the inside of the fence a standardized metal mesh fencing. Fencing to be in dark green. Purpose to be to keep a young child in and animals out. I have also attached a check in the amount of $25.00 made out to the Town of Avon. Please let me know if you have any question. /Sincerely: `�\\ Roger Wilkinson 303-949-7917 (h) 303-476-6322 (w) �b f10.." �_- -- -- c x M R 9 i f a July 21, 1994 TO: TOWN OF AVON ATTN: Mary Holden FROM: ROGER WILKINSON RE: PROPOSED FENCING 4422 EAGLEBEND DRIVE, AVON I am submitting the attached information to the Design/Review Committee. I am requesting z. building permit to install a standard 2 rail split rail fence at the above address - east side of the duplex. Attached ILC is marked in yellow for the location of proposed fence. Fence to be a cedar, 2 rail spilt rail fence material. Post is be approximately 62" long and should be about 46 inch out of the ground when installed. Rails are standard 10 ft length with the top rail to be approximately 40" from the ground. I would like to install on the inside of the fence a standardized metal mesh fencing. Fencing to be in dark green. Purpose to be to keep a young child in and animals out. I have also attached a check in the amount of $25.00 made out to the Town of Avon. Please let me know if you have any question. /Sincerely: `�\\ Roger Wilkinson 303-949-7917 (h) 303-476-6322 (w) �b f10.." �_- -- -- c x M R 9 i f a �Q 40 m EA GL ESEND iR.•ICT A' N a Y O i m m 2 W m W v 'u u m N `o25e#i O m 00 v W N � � O G O Q EA GL ESEND iR.•ICT A' N a DRIVE i yV\ �) �z 2 0 i W W u W 0 0 w Y 9 n N C r y i i n o 1! nJ n OYu E • C p .•� C C • O P n L ~ L E ., • y U ] Y •LO 2 W I Y p n - L uU 0 Y ] o o C o u u u m h 0 + T Y p . 0 [ m E oL . u C L t r E _ e O Y x e—ni Do s c G c >U u nn m! c c x i moi. p - ] r a T T 0 n V l u - DN O o VV n c L c w c P o u Y ] „ L 0 v LL • Y N c Y U p 0 O 0c v w B r Pr m Y i o n c o% fi 1, N E 6 O O�LNEo V V Uno c 0 E I r 4�-LOw PRFA o�»�nrr V tavw I v PTc_ ��^u Y r t V.2 r ZMn- y an r I A `o25e#i we x u 1v as�- 5._0._"22 ..` 8Co� "iii. of 40, .. --'?28'u�E�E g3 E3.[ DRIVE i yV\ �) �z 2 0 i W W u W 0 0 w Y 9 n N C r y i i n o 1! nJ n OYu E • C p .•� C C • O P n L ~ L E ., • y U ] Y •LO 2 W I Y p n - L uU 0 Y ] o o C o u u u m h 0 + T Y p . 0 [ m E oL . u C L t r E _ e O Y x e—ni Do s c G c >U u nn m! c c x i moi. p - ] r a T T 0 n V l u - DN O o VV n c L c w c P o u Y ] „ L 0 v LL • Y N c Y U p 0 O 0c v w B r Pr m Y i o n c o% fi 1, N E 6 O O�LNEo V V Uno c 0 E I r 4�-LOw PRFA o�»�nrr V tavw I v PTc_ ��^u Y r t V.2 r ZMn- y an r I A EA GL EBEND i nMrr+ 8 ^„« ��(•�2[:/ � Ln {}[�_ l -.L.4: ION i � n CMS sc*.,osu.n ' :ML•� 21,E= ?t\11L g ' 2 2 W m ti Y W W W 4 N b O 0 4 O 0 0 N � _ O ti J say; 4 V EA GL EBEND i nMrr+ 8 ^„« DRIVE (50.) N EUGf Of gSRII�,T a OVNCWM I` �}l �� lTvrlw gFS e$�g�g:� sang �h �_g P�Y4g7 as � ISO +O ^ C 0 O • f • + j L oi.%aJ a.. v c C • J P U V ] P++ 0 • L O I W I Y Y ✓ + _ n - v o U M ✓t V Y J 0 Y o c o a a m N v v L u u • n i n • • Y r V U p /D- 0 [ m J— V 0 0 ' n • o' n •cm [ + ✓ 0 l L • O 0 Y T w L 0 0 U L00 0 c Z V J n > D a a ] L • n n o V c P O 0 Y ] U O D LL Y 0 O ✓ O L P+ m W t . E • 0 82 . L L E [ n Y JQ Y�[O ,%.1< L •Yi nMrr+ 8 ^„« ��(•�2[:/ � Ln {}[�_ l -.L.4: ION i � n CMS sc*.,osu.n ' :ML•� 21,E= ?t\11L g g I LUT lc'A .aw I i� _ T_rr � n. rTAFr DRIVE (50.) N EUGf Of gSRII�,T a OVNCWM I` �}l �� lTvrlw gFS e$�g�g:� sang �h �_g P�Y4g7 as � ISO +O ^ C 0 O • f • + j L oi.%aJ a.. v c C • J P U V ] P++ 0 • L O I W I Y Y ✓ + _ n - v o U M ✓t V Y J 0 Y o c o a a m N v v L u u • n i n • • Y r V U p /D- 0 [ m J— V 0 0 ' n • o' n •cm [ + ✓ 0 l L • O 0 Y T w L 0 0 U L00 0 c Z V J n > D a a ] L • n n o V c P O 0 Y ] U O D LL Y 0 O ✓ O L P+ m W t . E • 0 82 . L L E [ n Y JQ Y�[O ,%.1< L •Yi L, 3 PC c L 8 ^„« ��(•�2[:/ � Ln {}[�_ l -.L.4: ION i � n CMS sc*.,osu.n ' :ML•� 21,E= ?t\11L g L, 3 PC 000A 10%, PLANNING Am) ZONING COMMISSION STAFF .-,PORT • August 2, 1994 • 40 Lot 14, Filing 2, Eaglebend Subdivision Backes Residence Final Design Review Modification of Color PROJECT TYPE: Single Family ZONING: PUD COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES INTRODUCTION: Kelly and Paul Backes have submitted a revised trim color of "chrome green "for their single family residence on Lot 14, Filing 2, of Eaglebend Subdivision. The residence was approved with no trim color. STAFF COMMENTS The trim color wiil be placed around all windows and garage. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the request as presented. 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, C1l Mary Holden Town Planner RECOMMENDED ACTION: a 00% r. PLANNING AiND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF ..,jEPORT August 2, 1994 Lot 14, Filing 2, Eaglebend Subdivision Backes Residence Final Design Review Modification of Color PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted (✓) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date Z Sue Railton, Secretary4a' This item was approved as part of the consent agenda r PLANNING A ZONING COMMISSION STAFF . SPORT • August 2, 1994 Lot 104, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Pressley Duplex Final Design Review Modification of Color PROJECT TYPE: Duplex ZONING: PUD COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES 114TRODUCTION: Dun Pressley has submitted a revised body color for his duplex on Lot 194, Block 1, Wildridge The proposed color is Devoe, Emerald Tint. STAFF COMMENTS The approved color was Devoe, Delta Fog. Color chips of both will be provided at the meeting. Staff has checked the color presently on the building against the approved color and there is a shade difference in the two colors. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends no conditions for this request, should the Commission approve the color change. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1, Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Mary Ho en Town Planner PLANNING A J ZONING COMMISSION STAFF^ PORT August 2, 1994 Lot 104, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Pressley Duplex Final Design Review Modification of Color PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions (�') Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date a2 2�Sue Railton, Secretary The Commission denied the request to leave the existing color on the building and instructed the applicant to paint the duplex the color which was originally approved, Devoe Delta Fog. PLANNING Anil ZONING COMMISSION STAFF .;PORT August 2, 1994 Lot 25, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Christie Lodge Final Design Review -Design Modifications PROJECT TYPE: Commercial Building ZONING: TC - Town Center COMPLIES WITH ZONING'' YES INTRODUCTION: Phyllis Lilischkies, has submitted an application to add a door on the west end of Subway's space. The door would match existing material, design and color. STAFF COMMENTS: Staff has no comments concerning this request. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Commission approval this as presented. RECOMMENDED ACTION: I. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, --Yv/ Ca Mary Holden Town Planner PLANNING Anil ZONING COMMISSION STAFF _—SPORT August 2, 1994 Lot 25, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Christie Lodge Final Design Review -Design Modifications PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted (4 Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date 64 Z l J ----Sue Railton, Secretary This item was approved as part of the consent agenda kC? 3 23 C---7- I jp)?)G July 26, 1994 Town of Avon Avon, CO 81620 Dear Sirs: We have approved a second exterior exit door (identical to existing) on the west most area of the Subway dining room in Building 2 of the Christie Lodge. We would like to obtain city approval for the Christie Lodge and Mr. Ray Kachel, owner of Subway in same. Sincerely, Phyllis Lilischkies Operations Manager cc: See attached letter PO Box 1196 • Avon. C081620,1 196 13031949-7700 ep d -"101 .0L, Iffy Mr. Lynn Weas CHRISTIE 'LODGE Dear Mr. Weas: We would like to request permission to cut an exit door out of the front of the Subway located in the Christie Lodge. This door would be to ;he west of the existing door. It would be 1 step up for easy access and would look exactly like the other exterio.!-Aqor. It would be done in a very professional manner. SincO <Za L. Ray Z0'd 99LL606£0£T 01 EPM j� NUMIH WO?" G0:£T V%T-19Z--nf a � "R 4 .v. �' \ { I. ., r" PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF KEPORT August 2, 1994 Lot 17, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Avon Villas Final Design Review -- Modification of Color PROJECT TYPE: Six Plex ZONING: RLD COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES INTRODUCTION: The Avon Villas Owners Association has submitted a request to repaint their building. The body color will be Asteroid, which is a brown -beige and the trim will be Buckingham, which is a muted dark green. STAFF COMMENTS Staff has no comments regarding this application. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recemmends the Commission approve this application as presented. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, 14.1 4 0 Mary Holden Town Planner WL PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF 1KEPORT August 2, 1994 Lot 17, Blcck 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Avon Villas Final Design Review -- Modificatiou of Color PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions (✓) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date_ .ZSue Railton, Secreta ry_-4i—ce'�� The Commission apprnyed the -j-d hnrly rninr but inctnictori rhP_?,^,.,^. l icant that the trim and fascia color should be the reddish/brown that is on the fascia now, not the proposed green 00114 PLANNING AND TONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT August 2, 1994 Lot 5, Wildridge Acres Loria Residence Variance - Rear Yard Setback PROJECT TYPE: Single Family Residence ZONING: PUD COMPLIES WITH ZONING? No, Requires a Variance to Rear Yard Setback Requirements This is a Public Hearing for a variance to the rear yard setback on Lot 5, Wildridge Acres. INTRODUCTION: Mr. Angelo Loria is requesting a variance to the rear yard setback requirements for an existing encroachment of a two story deck and a further encroachment for the upper deck expansion. The existing and proposed encroachment will be 2.83' into tho setback and extend 19' in length along the southwest property line. STAFF COMMENTS: Before acting on a variance application, the Commission shall consider the following factors with respect to the , equested variance: Section 17.36.40approval Criteria_ A. The relationship of the requested variance to existing and potential uses and structures in the vicinity. Comment: The requested variance is in keeping with the su-founding uses and structures in the area. Other residences in the area have large decks. B. The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpr:fation and enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibly and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity. Comment. The degree of' relief being sought is minimal. Existing and proposed encroachment will be 2.83' into the rear setback and expend 19' in length C. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety. Comment. The effect of the request will have no negative impacts on ligia, air, population, transportation, traffic facilities, public facilities, utilities or public safety. D. Such other factors and criteria as the Commission deems applicable to tae requested variance. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT August 2, 1994 Lot 5, Wildridge Acres Lorca Residence Variance - Rear Yard Setback low Comment. Staff has not identified any other factors for the Commission to consider. • FINDINGS REQUIRED: The Planning and Zoning Commission shall make the following findings before granting a am variance: A. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties in the vicinity. B. That the grant;,.g of the variance will not be dttrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. C. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons: i. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship ir_consistent with the objectives of this title; ii. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the vicinity; iii. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the-necified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the vicinity. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommendation is for approval of Resolution No. 94-14 , A Resolution Approving a Variance from the Rear Yard Setback Requirements, as Stipulated in Title 17 of the Avon municipal Code fi-r Lot 5, Wildridge Acres, Town of Avon, Eagle County, Colorado. :f following the public hearing, the Commission does not concur with the findings, Resolution 94-14 should be amended accordingly prior to adoption. RECOMMENDED ACTION: L Introduce Application 2. Applicact Presentation PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT August 2, 1994 Lot 5, Wildridge Acres Loria Residence Variance - Rear Yard Setback 3. Open Public Hearing 4. Close Public Hearing 5. Commission Review 6 Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Mary Holdr Town Planner PLANNING AND ZGNtNG ACTION: Approved as submitted Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, Ne Action ( ) Date . Sue Railton, Secretary SEE ATTAUED SHEET �141!� Lot 5, Wildridge Acres Subdivision, Rear Yard Setback Variancca, Public Hearing The Commission approved Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution 94-14, A Resolution Approving A Variance From The Rear Yard Setback Requirements As Stipulated in Title 17 Of -he Avon Municipal Code, citing the following conditions: A. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties in the vicinity. B. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materiall injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. C. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the foller-ing reasons: 1. That the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title. 2. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone district. 3. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. N � � I � � N � Y li to -14 n� Al„ 6f, 90. ZOS 9 107 V o \ < li to -14 n� Al„ 6f, 90. ZOS 9 107 i • M Robert Matarese and Trudy Matatese P.O. Box 2222 Vail, Color -do 81658 July 29, 1993 RECEIVED Town of Avon AUG 11994 � Recording Secretary, Planning and Zoning Commission P.O. Box 975 Avon, Colorado 81620 TOWN OF A Vel N Re: Lot 5, Wildridge Acres To Whom it May Concern: As owners of the adjoining property, I have no objection to the expansion of the deck of the Loria home. 1 wish diem the best of luck with their new horn, and welcome them to the neighborhood Sincerely, Bob & 'Trudy Malarese TOWN OF AVON PLANNING A?,TD ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 94-14 SERIES OF 1904 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE FROM THE REAR YARD SETBACK REQUIREMENTS AS STIPULATED IN TITLE 17 OF THE AVON MUNICIPAL CODE, FOR LOT 5, WILDRIDGE ACRES, TOWN OF AVON, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO WHEREAS, Angelo Loria, owner of Lot 5 ,Wildridge Acres, has applied for a setback variance from the "Rear Yard Building Setback" requirements as stipulated in Title 17, of the Avon Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, a public hearing has been held by the Planping and Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon, pursuant to notices required by law, at which time the applicant and the public were given an opportunity to express their opinion- and present certain information and reports regarding the proposed Rear Yard Building Sett ack Variance application and has considered: 1. The relationship of the requested variance to oi.her existing or potential uses and structures in the icinity, 2. The degree to whch relief from the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement's of a s, .cified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity, or to attain the objectives of this title without grant of speciai privilege; 3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distrihution of population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety, 4. Such other favlors and criteria as the Commission deems apolicalik to the proposed [1 RESOLUTION NO. ()4 - i4 SERIES OF 1994 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE FROM THE REAR YARD SETBACK REQUIREMENTS AS STIPULATED IN TITLE 17 OF THE AVON MUNICIPAL CODE, FOR LGT 5, WILDRIDGE ACRES, TOWN OF AVON, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO WHEREAS, ' igelo Loria, owner of Lot 5 , Wildridge Acres, has applied for a setback variance from the "Rear Yard Building Setback" requirements as stipulated in Title 17, of the Avon Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, a public hearing has been held by the Pianning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon, pursuant to notices required by law, at which time the applicant and the public were given an opportunity to express their opinions and present certain information and reports regarding the proposed Rear Yard Building Setback Variance application and has considered: 1. The t -lationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity, 2. The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement's of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity, or to attain the objectives of this title without grant of special privilege; 3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety; 4. Such other .dors and criteria as the Commission deems applicable to the proposed variance. 11 WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds: A. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent 110 with the limi ations on other properties in the vicinity. B. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially inj:uious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. C. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons: The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the regulation would result in practr�al difficulty or unnecessary physical 'hardship inconsistent with the objectives f this title. 2. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. 3. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the s. -.me district. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon, Colorado, hereby approves the 2.83' setback variance firom the southwest portion of the "Rear Yard Building Setback" requirement of Title 17 of the Avon Municipal Code for Lot 5, WildriJge Acres,Town of Avon, Eagle County Colorado as further shown on Attachment A. ADOPTED THIS DAY OF j,�,1994 61 Secretary Chairman welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. C. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons: 1. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title. 2. There are exceptional or extrac rdi nary circumstances or conditions applicable to the site of the v2riance that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. 3. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon, Colorado, hereby approves the 2.83' setback variance from the southwest portion of the "Rear Yard Building Setback" requirement of Title 17 of the Avon Municipal Code for Lot 5, Wildridge Acres,Town of Avon, Eagle County Colorado as further shown on Attachment A. AJOPTED THIS�G6k_sf'/ DAY OF 1994 Secretary Chairman i°*4 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT August 2, 1994 Lot 37, Block 1, Wildri'7e Subdivision Shearwood Duplex Final: Design Review PROJECT TYPE: Duplex ZONING: PUD, Duplex COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES INTRODUCTION: An application for Final Design Review of a duplex on Lot 37, Block 1, Wildridge has been submitted by Shearwood Homes. The lot is .48 acre- in size. The building will contain two levels and stand approximately 29 1/2' tall. The duplexes will consist of the following materials: Roof Siding Other Fascia Soffits Window Door Door Trim Hand/Deck Rails Flues/Flashings Chimn,-y Materials asphalt dark brown 3/4 lap nat. cedar stucco Alaska white 2x 10 w/ I x4 shingle rustic brown 1/4 cedar ply " weathered shield alum clad brown solid wood panel nat cedar brick rustic brown redwood picket natural V&Z, metal not indicated stuCCo " The landscape plan will include 10 blue spruce at 8' high, 9 Colorado spruce at 8' high, 4 narrow leaf cottonwood at 3" caliper, 2 crab apple at 3" caliper, 2 honey suckle at 5 gallons, 4 choke berry at 5 gallons and 6juniper at 5 gallons The trees will be irrigated with a drip system The area will be revegetated with mountain mix native grasses REVIE" HISTORY The Commission reviewed this application at the July 5, 1994 meeting and made the following comments • Likes the way house hugs into hill, • Need some sort of landscaping island between the two sets of garages, • Good landscaping on other side of asphalt since that is where living room window. face • 'Type of garage do - s, • Like roof forms, • Landscaping needed between tow units, • Like way materials transitioning, t� Ao - PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT to August 2, 1994 Lot 37, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Shearwood Duplex Final Design Review Concern with image of garage doors; • Try to disguise doors by having one of them being one larger door; • East unit seems to he less exciting in terms of capturing view; and • Minor dormer out of the hip to get the living room view up a bit so that it is more 44 comparable to other side. STAFF COMMENTS: The site plan indicates a great amount of regrading, which appears to be unnecessary. Staff would like the applicant to consider ending the regrading closer to the building instead of the property lines. Staff would like to make the applicant aware that slopes may not exceed 2:1. Finished slopes appear to be reaching this maximum on the south side by the driveway. The Brading plan does not coincide with the front elevation for the west unit, which the applicant will submit a revised elevation at the meeting. The revision will show the slope in front approximately 4' less, meaning more of the building may show. Otherwise, the elevation remains the same. DESIGN REVIEW CONSIDERATIONS: _ he Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of this project: Conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable regulations of the Town. Comment This proposal is in conformance with Yown codes. The suitability of the improvement, including type and quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located. Comment: T he type and quality of proposed building and landscape materials are consistent with Town guidelines The compatibility of the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties. Comment: All impacts will be contained on site The compatibility of the proposed improvements with site topography. Comment The design minimize the impact to the site PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF KEPORT August 2, 1994 Lot 37, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Shearvvood Duplex Final Design Review The visual appearance of my proposed improvement as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. Comment: The visual appearance oj' the proposed improvements will not negatively impact neighboring properties or public ways The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. Comment: The proposal meets the objective of this guideline. The general conformhnce of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. Comment: The proposal is in conformance with the goals, policies and programs for the Town of Avon. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this final design review with the following conditions: 1. The flues, flashings and vents be painted to match the color scheme of the building. 2. The building lighting be approved by staff prior to issuance of a building permit. 3. Revegetation include native bushes. 4. Meters be placed on the building. RECOMMENDED ACTION: I. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4 Commission Action Respectfully Submitted t— Mary Holden Town Planner PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT August 2, 1994 Lot 37, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Shearwood Duplex Final Design Review PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approv--d with recommended conditions (. ) Approved with modified conditions ( ✓ Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date_ .2 / Sue Railton, Secretary /CsLc The Commission granted final design approval with the following conditions: 1. The flues, flashings and vents be painted to match the color scheme of 2. The building lighting be approved by Staff prior to issuance of a building permit 3. Revegetation include native bushes. 4. Meters be placed on the building. b. The addition o a minimum o en various s ru s o e p ace aroun the building. ate. 7. The garage door details should be of the original, squared off variety. 8__ThP_3pnlirant apraec to in a 19 inrh m arh-ng 11 tha may rnund�lncluding the gable end. MM Lem 021 0 ME KRM CONSULTANTS, INC. P.O. Box 4572 VAIL. COLORADO 81658 (303) 949-9391 FAX (303) 949.1577 2x (;p STO p h)A LL --� W/ �I2- QL(wc. o(Z wp.�e�zBoA+-� SFf-E�T1+-I r�lG-. AP?F-0x. -�— T 81181 �o # 5's I lo` �Q7- — �� BIZ. zt� S cv,1 L 243' L 4�5'S x II -(o SII �Fo izl Z . (—t�Pt PPE f _'0i e I.� JOB DUPE- IO SHEET N0. OF CALCULATED BY M W D DATE 30 CHECKED BY SCALE DATE ANT �ea-r�� AT- CALCULATED r (2) --tr5's r. I - FoRIz. Tcf BA R-05. 81151-0 T. o. F• At A 10 n: J.. {:{ i ".'1'a /(J,. li' i v L A 1 � n: J.. {:{ i ".'1'a 0 �I �JL�J -1\ #*`$ PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REEPORT August 2, 1994 Lot 7, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Chanticler 3 Plea Final Design Review PROJECT TYPE: 3 Units ZONING: PUD COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES INTRODUCTION: Mark Donaldson has submitted plans for Final Design Review approval of a triplex on lot 7. The triplex will contain three levels and stand approximately 34' high. The triplex will consist of the following materials: Roof Siding Other Fascia Soffits Window Window Trim Door Door Trim Hand/ Deck Rail Flues/Flashings Materials Color 350# Fiberglas Reinforced asphalt gray blend 1x6 TG redwood Oly. 717--semi-trans. stucco #10513 rs cedar not indicated redwood white clad wood N/A not indicated metal GI flashing A landscape plant list has been attached to this report. REVIEW HISTORY The Commission has not review this design as a conceptual. STAFF COMMENTS: white no finish • The site plan indicates a 2' rail road tie retaining wall. The Design Guidelines state that used rail road ties are not permissible. Further, the retaining wall is for aesthetic value, not structural, however, it is in the setbacks, which will require a variance. Staff recommends the rail road ties be eliminated and native rock be utilized, which is defined as a landscape feature. ..1 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT August 2, 1994 Lot 7, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Chanticler 3 Plez Final Design Review • The access for this project will be through Suncrest Townhomes. Suncrest is located on the west half of lot i, which was subdivided. The plat does not indicate an access easement to the east half of the lot. Staff must have legal documentation that access has been granted to the: applicant prior to application for a building permit • The landscape plan indicates trees located near the edge of the pavement. Staff will require the applicant to locate the landscape material away from the edge of paveme,:t to allow for snow storage and prevent damage to the trees by snow being piled. ♦ Exterior building lighting has not been indicated. The applicant must receive app -oval from Staff'for the exterior lighting. • Revegetation of the utility cuts and site disturbance must include native bushes, in addition to native grass and wildflower mix. This may be done through the landscape plan, which includes native bushes. ♦ The applicant will have to work out Engineering concerns, should they aris: DESIGN REVIEW CONSIDERATIONS: The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of this project: Conformance with th,r Zoning Code and other applicable regulations of the Town. Comment: This proposal is in conformance with Town codes The suitability of the improvement, including type and quality of materials of which it is to be constructecl and the site upon which it is to be located. Comment The r pa and quality of proposed building and landscape materials are consistent with Town guidelines. 'The compatibility of the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties. Comment All impacts will be contained on site The compatibility of the proposed improvements with site topography. Comment: The design minimize the impact to the site .0 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT August 2, 1994 Lot 7, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Chanticler 3 Plea Final Design Review The visual appearance of any proposed improvement as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. Comment: The visual appearance of the proposed improvements will not negatively impact neighboring properties or public ways. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. Comment: The proposal meets the objective of this guideline. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. Comment: The proposal is in conformance with the goals, policies and programs for the Town of Avon STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this final design review with the following conditions I . The flues, flashings and vents be painted to match the color scheme of the building 2. The building lighting be approved by staff prior to issuance of a building permit 3. Revegetation include native bushes. 4. Electric and water meters be placed on the building 5. Prior to arra site disturbance, a construction/erosion control fence be placed on site. 6. The landscape material be located away from the edge of pavement 7. The applicant address all Engineering concerns prior to the application for a building permit 8. The rail road tie retaining wall material be changed to native rock and boulders 9. The applicant must provide to the Town of Avon legal documentation showing access to the east portion of Lot 7, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision PRIOR to the application of a building permit. 10 Compliance with Engineering concerns pending their review RECOMMENDED ACTION: I Introduce Application 2 Applicant Presentation lit PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT August 2, 1994 Lot 7, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Chanticler 3 Plex Final Design Review 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, — Mary Holden ' Town Planner PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( -� Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date ,Z / Sue Railton, Secretary. . The Commission granted final design approval with the following conditions: 1. The flues, flashings and vents be painted to match the color scheme of the Duliaing. 2. The building lighting be approved by Staff prior to issuance of a building permit. 3. Revegetation include native bushes. 4. Electric and water meters be placed on the build in . 5. Prior to any site disturbance a construction/erosion fence e p aced onsite. 6. The applicant address all engineering concerns prior to the application 7. The railroad tie retaining wall material be changed to native rock and boulders. R Tho applicant must provide to the Town of Aynn legal documpntatinn showing access to the east portion of Lot 7, prior to the application for a building permit. 9. Compliance with Engineering concerns pending their review. 10. The addition in the landscape plan of 10 redtwig dogwood, and have the buffalo juniper be reduced to ten and then an additional 15 other varieties of shrubs be placed on the east and west elevations. 11. Provide a trash pad and enclosure to match the existing architecture. ��M1 _�� _�\ \`� \ ��• LONER' YIr 3'06'E ` 6016' �. •. LNIN6 .. _... _... _... _... _... �.�_ .. _ �`.._\`.\_....r...., -- TOTAL >a• .' wnrr. "�.evc my rAsr�rwZ .\ ' . MAIN _—________ B LIVING •LIVINGTOTAL y. ♦GEING SARA _TOTAL � SITE / LANDSCAPE PLAN RFriA INs \ m (�* FUT J� canou� r AVAL rw SCAU . t•• "'W E OM I I ■ 1, 1! V A LANDSCAPE LEGEND NOTE: REVEGETATE ALL GOti77RUGTION SCARS W/ NATIVE GRASSES. SYMBOL NAME W W W W W W W W W W GOLORADO BLUE SPRUCE.' 6-8" TALL GUAKIN6 ASPEN 2" GALIPER BUFFALO JUNIPER 5 GAL. REDTWICG DOGWOOD 2 1/2" GALIPER SOD GUANTI TT D 12 20 Ce] / J / \ fie' I / . f 31 `t. J 31 IC x \ pN `\ 16932' \ N /8-01 17 �� ai• Q _ \ tlu n 3 \ :,. '��s'. �`�� +^•wv s, 7.57 41 Mt ....ry �• ':fee .4'.. :��s - � Brandvwine Brokers 3039490442 P.O,} Ars. AxkvfinXbhmrb J4N4 .I �Chri l�J �; l'G'�(�l1ZfG �r.(lGG`G*TC �D�t.Lt.L� �-i'QtGaG • � lJ •� �/cl-B�GC- �/ti��,GTiGti�j� ..G GGL��G��.z-�>�'G��GLu—G'J �fi/ZCelle fle PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT August 2, 1994 Lot 3, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision Fourplex Final Design Review PROJECT TYPE: Fourplex ZONING: PUD, Fourplex COMPLIES WITH ZONING? NO INTRODUCTION: Robert Kaufmann, on behalf of Mountain Coast Homes, has submitted an application for Final Design Review of a fourplex on Lot 3, Block 2, Wildridge. The lot, 1.12 acres in size, and has slopes ranging from 31 to 55%. The building will contain three and one half levels. The units will consist of the following materials: Materials Colors Roof G.A.F. - Timberline burnt sienna blend Siding horizontal cedar siding natural Other stucco wheat field Fascia cedar green band Soffits cedar natural Window vinyl clad wood natural Window Trim cedar natural Door metal green bank Door Trim cedar natural Han&Deck Rails cedar natural Flues N/A Flashings metal natural Trash Enclosure wood natural/green bank A landscape plant list is attached to this report. REVIEW HISTORY The Commission reviewed this application at the May 17, 1994 meeting and commented on the following • Building height and how propose to lower; • Four identical units with no variation to window fenestration's, garage doors, etc., • Use of decorative devices, • Identical not being acceptable, • South elevation maybe have heavier trim around windows, 0 Variations architecturally on multi -family attached homes looks tacky, Q19 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT August 2, 1994 Lot 3, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision Fourplex Final Design Review • Steep lot; • Exposed foundations; • Stucco to grade; and • Individual trash pick up suggested due to dumpster location and how functional location being. STAFF COMMENTS: At the conceptual review, Staff listed va-ious concerns with the site plan and building design. The list is below: 1. Finished slopes may not exceed 2: I; 2. The applicant will be given the Steep Slope Guidelines, 3. Detail must be provided on all retaining walls and if over 4', designed by an Engineer, 4. The retaining wall encroaches in the side yard setback and a variance will be needed, 5. Building height may not exceed 35'. 6. Staff questions how functional the dumpster location will be for trash pick up', 7. The topography must be certified by a land surveyor or engineer and include true limits of site disturbance, utility connections, show all easements, 8 Revegetation of all disturbed areas is required, and must include native bushes 9. Colors and materials need to be called out on the elevations; 10. The type of fireplace needs to be indicated, and 11. Exterior building lighting must be indicated on the elevations submitted for FDR .Sire Plan: • Finished slopes still exceed 2.1. • Detail has not been provided on the retaining walls, which appear to be as high as 14' in some locations. Further, there is a retaining wall in the side yard setback, which will require the application for a variance to the setback requirements and approval by the Commission • Staff would like the Commission to comment on the location of the trash dumpster and how functional it will be for a truck to come in and pick up the dumpster • The building height issue was discussed with the Commission. Attached to the report are the elevations indicating building height on all four elevations. Two of the four elevations are under the 35' height limit • This project, due to the steep nature of the site, will be required to place a construction and erosion control fence on the site prior to any site disturbance --4N PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION --"TA7F REPORT August 2, 1994 Lot 3, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision Fourplex Final Desig.s Review DESIGN REVIEW CONSIDERATIONS: The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of this project: Conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable regulations of the Town. Comment: This propos2l is not in conformance: with Town codes. The suitability of the improvement, including type and quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located. Comment: The type and quality of proposed building and landscape materials are consistent with Town guidelines. The compatibility of the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties. Comment: ASI impacts will be contained on site. The compatibility of the proposed improvements with site topography. Comment: The location of the building is utilizing the steepest portion of the site. The visual appearance of any proposed improvement as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. Comment The visual appearance of the proposed improvements will be tall to surrounding neighbors. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. Comment: The proposal meets the objective of this guideline The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. Comment The proposal is not in conformance with the goals, policies and programs for the Town of Avon. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommendation is for tabling this application until the above comments are addressed. We are making ;his recommendation for the following reasons: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT August 2, 1994 Lot 3, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision Fourplex Final Design Review 1. The site stay significantly change due to the elimination of finished slopes in excess of 2.1; 2. The scale of the retaining walls require that the Town Engineer review them and the Commission review the appearance, and 3. The location ofthe trash dumpster does not appear to be fimctional. 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3 Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfi,lly Submitted Mary Holden Town Planner RECOMMENDED ACTION: PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued (• ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date &Z�yz�Sue Railton, Secretaryt'� Due to -several conQgrns Q sc th-P--Cion-U-dregarding this application. they tabled this item until the next regular meeting of August 16, 1994 1 — 1 11 1 1 \ 1 0 <'• � I ' 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 I 1 '1 1 I I 1 11 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I .1 P -.CZ 1{ 11 ' I I 1 � 11 I I 1 gg I a---------- I � 1 I I I J• // '_-- -__ _ I wwawsl, �_ co I 1 1 - 1 I ' 1 1 1 1 I I ' I I , I � I I1 I li I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I— z 00 00 Q D Cy Li N I z w Lij (n c:) 1 Q O CD � o U J Q o CL --D CD �t Ln N d Lo F. z m mm rd m 0 vo m mm C�6 z 00 00 I n U (DCD �� I z w Lij (n c:) 1 Q O CD � o U J Q o CL --D CD �t Ln N d Lo EL C) U Qm LL(L Ch (-D -1 F. z m mm z m 0 vo m mm C�6 m 00 00 I n U (DCD �� N EL C) U Qm LL(L Ch (-D -1 z CL m w z � I n U V) �� zm L.L' Q z m � w y z �- w U CLn � _ EL C) U Qm LL(L Ch (-D -1 �s: 4 4 r� t\ ti Cr .. _ `� _, , 4 r� t\ ti ON M) I" PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT August 2, 1994 Lot 1, Englewood Subdivision 96 Unit Complex -- Brookside Final Design Review PROJECT TYPE: 96 Units ZONING: RHDC COMPLIES WITH ZONING? Yes INTRODUCTION: The applicant has provided revised information. Attached to this report is the original Staff report dated July 19, 1994, the applicant's letter addeessed to Stats, and the revised plans and elevations. REVIEW HISTORY The Commission reviewed this application as a Conceptual at the May 17, 1994 and informally at the June 7, 1994 meeting and made the following comments: • Impacts to the site as townhome project; • Setbacks; • Covered parking, • Height; and • Taller, denser buildings to preserve site features. At the July 19, 1994 Commission meeting, this application was tabled. The Commission, however, commented on the following: • Stairs on the building, • Setback from buildings to HWY. 6/24, • Landscaping lacking on HWY. 6/24 side, • Major clumps of aspen added, • Access to HWY. 6/24; • Timber detail be more prominent; • Buildings being lower than HWY. 6/24, • Taking of spruce trees; • Building corners being staked forsite visit; • Runoff from ditch could pose problem; • Mark which trees will be removed or saved, • Gauge of metal roof, • flow protect trees during construction; • Image of buildings and how they Ft with the Town; • Form variation by stepping back and have intermediate little oofs; • Repetitious nature; • Trash enclosures; • Public access to river; PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT August 2, 1994 Lot 1, Eaglewood Subdivision 96 Unit Complex — Brookside Final Design Review • Phasing plan; and • Plat note on Eaglewood Subdivision, STAFF COMMENTS:! Staff has attached to this report the Eaglewood Subdivision General Notes for the Commission's information. Site Plan Comments: DraitRgq Plan: The drainage plan is currently being reviewed by the Engineer and comments will given at the meeting. Fpstitrg Trees: The applicant will be staking the building corners, allowing the Commission to determine what trees will be removed, taking into consideration area for construction. Eaglewood Subdivision Plat Note T This note states "Upper Eagle Valley Sanitation District must approve any building or structural footings occurring within 15' of the sewer easement..." Staff would like the applicant to supply us with Upper Eagle Valley Sanitation District's approval of this project prior to a building permit application. Eagle River Corridor Comments: 30' Stream Setback: The site plan vaguely reflects the 30' setback from the mean annual high water mark Staff would like to applicant to be. aware that no site disturbance is allowed in the 30' setback. Further, Eaglewood Subdivision plat note # 3 states "Drainage, public pedestrian, park land and open space easement shall be for use of the general public which use shall not be limited or interfered with by declarant or its assigns. Permanent structures, other than bike paths, will not be allowed with the 30' stream setback on the south side of the Eagle River, including the 30' stream setback area on both Lot 2 and Tract W." The site plan does not indicate any public access. Staff has discussed flat Note 3 with our Town Attorney, and it was his opinion that this development could be construed as interfering with the open space easement by not having public access to the easement and river Staff will have an answer for the Commission at the meeting. the Colorado Division of Wildli is reviewing this proposal with regards to the Eagle River corridor, the riparian habitat and other issues related to the river, such as identifying any rapture (birds of prey) nests.. Their comments will be forwarded to us, which in turn will be relayed to the applicant and the Commission. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT August 2, 1994 Lot 1, Eaglewood Subdivision 96 Unit Complex — Brookside Final Design Review STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this application with the following conditions: 1. No site disturbance or grading may take place on the 30' stream setback, except for the construction of the bike path. 2. Prior to any site disturbance, a construction/erosion control fence be placed at the 30' stream setback. 3. Plans for the water line extension be approved by the Town of Avon and the Avon Metropolitan District PRIOR to the application for a building permit. 4. A drainage report be submitted to the Town of Avon and approved by the Town Engineer PRIOR to the application of a building permit. 5. The developer provide to the Town of Avon permission from the respective agency for the piping of the irrigation ditch PRIOR to the application of a building permit. 6. The developer provide to the Town of Avon, Colorado Division of Transportation permission for the access onto HWY. 6/24 PRIOR to the application of a building permit. 7. The developer will install the bike path, as indicated in the Recreation Master Plan, prior to the issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy of the first constructed building. 8. The applicant must provide to the Town of Avon Upper Fagle Valley Sanitation District permission for the improvements located 15' from the sewer easement PRIOR to the application of a building permit. 9. The flues, flashings and vents be painted to match the color scheme of the building. 10. The building lighting be approved by Planning and Zoning Commission. 11. Revegetation include native bushes. 12. Meters be placed on the building. RECOMMENDED ACTION: I Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully Submitted- Mary ubmittedMary Holden, Town Planner • °"N PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT August 2, 1994 Lot 1, Englewood Subdivision 96 Unit Complex — Brookside Final Design Review PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) i Approved with modified conditions (✓f Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date Sue Railton, Secretary The Commission granted final design approval with the following conditions: 1. Ido site disturbance or grading may take place on the 30' stream setback, except Tor the construction e DlKe path. 2. Prior to any site disturbance, a construction/erosion control fence be 3. Plans for the water line extension be approved by the Town of Avon and Avon Metropolitan District prior tQ the application for a building permit. 4. A drainage report be submitted to the Town of Avon and approved by the Town Engineer prior to the application for a building permit. i. mu ueveiupLr pr-uviue t0 tre sown pT Avon, COlbradb lVl 1 sportation permission for the access wito Highway 6/24 prior to application fnr a building permit. 6. The developer provide to the Town of Avon, Upper Eagle Valley Sanitation District permiss4on for the improvements located 15' from the swere easement prior to the application for a building permit. 7. The developer provide to the Town of A%on permission from the respective agency for the piping of the irrigation ditch prior to the application for a building permit 8. The developer will install the bike path as indicated in the Recreation Master Plan prior to the issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy of the first constructed building. 9. Flues, flashings and vents be painted to match the color scheme of the building. 10. The building lighting be approved by Planning and Zoning Commission. 11. Revegetation include native bushes. 12. Meters be placed on the buildings. 13. The landscape plan be brought back prior to the first TCO being issued. 14. Have the snow shedding approved by Staff. `p 4 PETER JAMAR ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING • DEVELOPMEN! ANALYSIS • RESEARCH July 26, 1994 Mary Holden Town of Avon PO Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 RE: Brookside Dear Mary: Under cover of this letter please find a revised set of Brookide design drawings. These revisions are in direct response to comments and suggestions made by both Staff and Planning Commission members at last Tuesday's meeting. We have made every attempt to incorporate all of the design suggestions that we were given at the meeting and are very pleased with the results. The architectural set of drawings includes revisions to sheet SP -1, Landscape Plan; sheet A-4 and sheet A -4A, Building Elevations. The changes include the addition of spruce trees along the common property line with Highway 6, revisions to the stairways at the rear elevation, and a revision and detailing of the stair/ramp/entry design at the front elevation. In addition, the front entry column has been revised and the base color will be brought higher up on the building. A revised colored elevation will be presented at the meeting. The property line between Lot 1 and Tract W is indicated across the length of the development site. An engineering set of drawings and a drainage report is also included with this revision package. The engineering drawings support the drainage report, address the staff request for a utility plan, and detail the proposed accel/decel lane plan. In addition to these revisions a question was raised by the Planning Commission regarding the .-oof Irnaterial. The metal roof will be a standing seam material with a rib spacing of 16 inches. We believe these revisions incorporate all of the Planning Commission and staff comments from the July 19 meeting. The building comers will be staked, as requested, for a site visit to be conducted on August 2, and it is our understanding that these revisions will be presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting that evening. If you have any questions please feel free to call me at 476-7154. Sincerely, 74444-1 fa Rick Pylman, AICP Suite 204, Vail National Bank Building 108 South Frontage Road West • Vail, Colorado 81657 • (303) 476 7154 C ��l LtiCz X � �-t.k_)D j GENERAL MOTLS 1• Date of Survey: 9/21/88 `\ 2. basis of Dearing: Vest lint of the ML 1/4 MV 1/4 Section 11 TSS, 1112W.thS noethweat Property cermer of Lot 2 of i cap) to the soul as, corner of Lot 2 rcap): N00 16 26'15 3. Drainage, public pedestrian, parkland and open space easement shall be for bi ase Of the general public which use shall not be limited or interfered with withihideclarant or its tn. will ant be allowed wiPermanent structures„ other than bike paths, n the 30' stream setback on the south side of the lag's River, including the 30' stream setback area on both Lot 2 and Tract V. 4• N development will be permitted except in accordance with detailed drainage Plane providing for the control of drainage and Irrigation ditflows across Rib sits'as rquired for protection of the site development. 3- A and all residential development A" and are asst red,rights previously allocated to this followas assigned transferred, and allocated to Lot 1 and Lot 2 as Lot 1: 90 Residential Development Rights Lot 2: SO Realdemtlal Development Rights 6. Title of Tract V to be conveyed to the Town of Avon no later than April 1, 1997, of ee Cost to the Town of Avory r 7, Opper Ingle footings Sanitation District mast approve saq lwildl�ig or struc W lags occurring Foot 'Within this area are to ao redwit13' of the sewer eeasewnt. diQ8 o@ feet be lowered to a point intersected by naaa•rleg four (4') mouth and six taehea (6') below the invert of the sewer main and thea w • 2:1 slope up. This ROSS• if a building use located at the "w'smeat 1100 (ten feet south of serer Rale), the bottom of the footing world be at an elevation One and oae-ball feet (1-1/2') above the top of the twelve Inch (12') sewer main. S. RDTICz:feiAccording toColorado law Yom most commence any legal •etr',om based defeat. In oo hissurvey within three years after you first discover such commenced more event, 007 any action based upon defect IS this @Scary De bereon. than ten years from the date of the certification shown LAND USS SUMMARY Lot 1 �• 4.709 Aeras - Mmlt!-Psmily Lot 2 3,329 Acres Total lncludingt 2.029 Acres - Mmlt!-Tamil la acres of Drainage, P*bYlecPedes dest.5051 Parkland and OPS■ Spare Rasenest within the 30' stress setback), 1.300 Acres land under water within the Public 1 Pedestrian Parkland, and Open Space Resonant. roe 3.360 Awees - Pmblie Opes Space, Park* *sd �Rsls*g*> ✓.0 V.fu .� ��wV I�I�., ._ n111NIWVut�- ��:..:..11 u \ \ r 00 \ , Ol I r t ♦ � 1 �9 I ♦ rg71 •`V y � 1 I 61 ,1 1 , d 9 i t ■ �^ U its 'ONI 'S31VIDOGGV ANVd M31AS3AIN ,A9 107ONJ 1N3WdOWA3U WnMCIQNOO V a•. v m ., �� I 0 � i I it .'w 0 I��11 I�-i�i I • 0 Egg w n,m .00t K V Is oll � Ic 9 I