The URL can be used to link to this page

PZC Packet 070594lei PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REr ORT July 5, 1994 Lot 47, Block 3, Wildridg^ Subdivision Smith Residence Final Design Review -Modification PROJECT TYPE: Single Family ZONING: PUD, One Unit COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES INTRODUCTION: Michael Perkin has submitted an application for modifications to the Final Design Review approved plans for a single family residence on Lot 47, Block 3, Wildridge. The modifications are in the landscape plan and the elevations, which are in your packet The colors and materials are remaining the same. The revised landscape plan includes: Pinion Fine/Juniper Tree 6 G high 6 8' high �kspen 18 2" cal. STAFF COMMENTS: The modifications are due to a revised grading plan, which allows for a 1 1/2:1 slope. A 1 1/2:1 slope may be considered with a satisfactory soils report prepared by a Soils Engineer. STAFF RECOMMENDA PION: Staff recommends approval of the modifications with the original conditions of approval and one additional condition. They are as follows: I . The main chimney stack be redesigned to a battered on the east and west sides and be brought back to staff for approval. 2 The spark an estor be concealed by a terra cotta tile chimney Flue. 3. All meters be placed on the building. 4. Flues, flashings and vents must have a finished surface, matching the color scheme of the structure. 5. The driveway can be less than 16 teet if approved by Town Staff and the Fire Department 6. Additional shrubbery be added to the project. 7. The applicant provide the Town with a satisfactory soils report, prepared by a Soils Engineer, prior to the application of a building permit. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REt ORT July 5, 1994 Lot 47, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision Smith Residence Final Design Review -Modification RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1, Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully Submitted Mary Holden Town P!anner PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted (4 Approved with recommended conditions Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) C<nceptual, No Action ( ) Date L __/99s� Sue Railton, Secretary_ SEE ATTACHED SHEET July 5, 1994 Lot 47, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision Smith Residence Final Design Review Modification The Commission approved the modifications with the following conditions: 1. The main chimney stark be redesigned to a battered on the east and west sides and be brought back for Staff approval. 2. The spark arrestor be concealed by a terra cotta tile chimney flue. 3. All meters be placed on the building. 4. Flues, flashings and vents must have a finished surface, matching the color scheme of the structure. 5. The driveway can be less than 16 feet if approved by Town Staff and the Fire Department. 6. Additional shrubbery be added to the project. 7. The applicant provide the Town with a satisfactory soils report, prepared by a Soils Engineer, prior to the application for a building permit. J _ r I a� fI l if 1 • ' � Jo .S'I aV'11 II •�,i / � � I �j'Ix 33 I I \ `�^ (TSI ;�: � 11 III II!�IIIII� p 111111 !I I II I! I !1 jI\N �•� I�I I I II t l 111 II IIS '\ V� 11!111 II' SII I II 1111 Zo I III 1 �I I II111111I\ 11u 'vi III �I•I lI I I I 1 11 1 I •�\ o a Z loN ,n\^Y' o v,; v •�' / S �/Ili'l // IIl'Jl /J / 1111 ! '1 ua� cp4ia'.�T• t� ?•"I 1. /l � % !/�/ / //% / ,�/ ,. ,, // r r +I II _n n�i I•"' / // // IIII // .• $ I 1 ISI I I it I `I J, I� jr Ii Ijil�ll�1 1 I I•:� I I l l i l l l l l I I I \ I l l It 1 1 1 I I III I i i I I I I I I a �IIIIIIIIIIIillli i I I j ( �j \, I I I I I I I I I I IIII I I I I I I I\ I \ I liljl IIII � 111 � 1 � 1 I I I lilij�Ijii�llll I i I I I I I IIIIJIII II I I I I \? ' IIII Iitll � IIIA `;; I I I 1 � I I '-- I-- t, -�.o � � �') v � �.[) � � . v Y � b' ;u 1 � � �') v � �.[) � � . v Y r PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REi ORT July 5, 1994 Lot 40, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Johnson Fence Final Design Review- Modification PROJECT TYPE: Residential ZONING: RD COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES INTRODUCTION: Tom Johnson received approval to place a fence on his property with the condition that the fence respect the 7.5' side yard setback and utility easement. The applicant has received approval from the utility companies to place the fence in the easment and is requesting the Commission approve the location. STAFF COMMENTS: Staff requests the applicant respect Buck Creek and it's banks when placing the fence STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Plannine ana Zoning Commission approve this application as presented. RECOMMENDED ACTION: I Introduce Application 2 .Applicant Presentation 3 Commission Review 4 Commission Action Respectfully submitted. Mary Holden Town Planner PLANNING AND 'ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REr ORT July 5, 1994 Lot 40, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Johnson Fence Final Design Review- Modification PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted (✓) Approved with recommended conditions (+'� Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date ' .5 1 Sue Railton, Secretary �� The Commission approved the fence location with the condition that the applicant respect Buck Creek and it's banks when placing the fence. 611 Y7 I F 1 oy •14 �\ Olds)!! W � LE'BZ! M1 1 a V , q I J . 5 >n ., 4 611 Y7 �o HydW H�N3B oy •14 611 � J Q CC I iiia F'i)11 i .;II F�FFIt F71F1: Y7 �o oy •14 �\ W � q J � J Q CC I iiia F'i)11 i .;II F�FFIt F71F1: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT July 5, 1994 Lot 63, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Seasons at Avon Final Design Review -Landscape Plan and Site Modifications PROJECT TYPE: Commercial Building ZONING: TC - Town Center COMPLIES WITH ZOAfNG? YES INTRODUCTION: Mark Donaldson, on behalf of the Seasons at Avon, has submitted an application for approval of the landscape plan and site modifications, which are as follows : 1 Emergency exit walkways out of daycare area, 2. Daycare play area and fence; and 3. Landscape plan. The landscape plan and plant list are attached to this report. STAFF COMMENTS: The fence around the daycare playground will match the existing metal tube fences found elsewhere on the site. The main comment concerning the daycare area is that the Mall Committee must approve the design and have a contract in place for use of the area and restoration provisions when the use ceases on the site. The landscape plan indicates street lighting. Two lights are required on Thoth sides of the east entrance to the building. STAFF RECOMMENDAT.ON: Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission approve this application with the following conditions: I That all modifications match the approved color them:: and design styles. 2. The daycare playground area design receive the Mall Comu.Mee approval and if the design changes, the design be resubmitted for Siaff approval. 3. Street lights be placed on both sides of the east entrance to the building 4. Approved landscape plan sha!I include curb, gutter, sidewalk and storm drainage as shown on engineering plans for review and approval. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT July 5, 1994 Lot 63, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Seasons at Avon Final Design Review -Landscape Plan and Site Modifications 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Mary Holden Town Planner PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions (�) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date S / Sue Railton, Secretary -Thernmrpi_SSion ;;pnrnv PA the modifications with_the- 1. All modifications rnatch the approved color theme and design styles. 2. The day care playground area design receive the Mall Committee d ifthe design LhdflyeS, the design be resubmItted Staff approval. 3. Street lights be placed on both sides of the east entrance to the building. 4. Approved landscape plan shall include curb, gutter, sidewalk and sL owir orr engine rin —approval . W P - V A P- n 1� �d 1 G� i h� � n I -1s %o 1 I\ 1 T 0 0 i .1, 0 MO 00r PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT July 5, 1994 Lot 72, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Brofos Residence Final Design Review PROJECT TYPE: Single Family ZONING: PUD, Duplex COMPLIES WITH ZONINr:, YES INTRODUCTION: Guy Parker, on behalf of Mr. and Mrs. Eric Brofos, has submitted an application for final design review of a single family residence on Lot 72, Block 1, which is .65 acres in size and slopes to the west at 26%. The single family unit will contain two levels and stand approximately 25' high. The single family unit will consist of the following materials: The landscape plan has been included in your packet. REVEFW HISTORY The Commission reviewed this application at the June 7, 1994 meeting and had the following comments. ■ steepness of the lot, ■ driveway slope; ■ step with the site; ■ north elevation has three windows that look awkward, ■ driveway design and maneuvering, ■ garage door need to be light color; ■ irrigation system' ■ balanced cut and fill situation; ■ roof pitch, ■ round circles support roof, Materials Color Roof celotex presidential wood tone Other lahabra stucco oatmeal Fascia r. s. cedar BM clear wood finish Soffits lx6 T&G SPF Window semco taupe Window Trim stucco misty Door/Trim fir BM clear wood finish Hand/Deck Rail peeled logs " Flues/Flashings galvanized not indicated Chimney stucco oatmeal The landscape plan has been included in your packet. REVEFW HISTORY The Commission reviewed this application at the June 7, 1994 meeting and had the following comments. ■ steepness of the lot, ■ driveway slope; ■ step with the site; ■ north elevation has three windows that look awkward, ■ driveway design and maneuvering, ■ garage door need to be light color; ■ irrigation system' ■ balanced cut and fill situation; ■ roof pitch, ■ round circles support roof, 0% '0-•, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT July 5, 1994 Lot 72, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Brofos Residence Final Design Review ■ east elevation needs more interest; and ■ more landscaping needed around house. STAFF COMMENTS: The first 20' of the driveway may not exceed 4% and the maximum grade for the driveway is 10%. A construction fence will be required on the south property line due to grading taking place within v of the property line. DESIGN REVIEW CONSIDERATIONS: The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of this project: Conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable regulations of the Town. Comment: This proposal is in conformance with Town codes. The suitability of the improvement, including type and quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located. Comment: The type and quality of proposed building and landscape materials are consistent with Town guidelines and the Wildridge area. The compatibiiety of the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties. Comment: All impacts will be contained on site. The compatibility of the proposed improvements with site topography. Comment: The design is compatible with the site. The visual appearance of any proposed improvement as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. Comment: The visual appearance of the proposed improvements will not negatively impact neighboring properties or public ways. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. Comment: The proposal meets the objective of this guideline 0 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT July 5, 1994 Lot 72, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Brofes Residence Final Design Review The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. Comment: The proposal is in conformance with the goals, policies and programs for the Town of Avon. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: 1. The flues, flashings and vents be painted to match the color scheme of the building. 2. The building lighting be approved by staff prior to issuance of a building permit. 3. Revegetation include native bushes. 4. Meters be placed on the building. 5. The first 20' of the driveway must maintain a maximum 4% s'op-- and 10% for the rest of the driveway. 6. Prior to any site disturbance, a construction fence be placed along the south property line of the site. 7. All engineering concerns be addressed prior to issuance of a building permit. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully Submitted -1/11C,,4-' Mary Holden Town Planner PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT July 5, 1994 Lot 72, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Brofos Residence Final Design Review PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( -I Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date 4 1Q c Sue Railton, Secretary The Commission granted final design approval with the following conditions: 1. The flues, flashings and vents be painted to match the color scheme Z� The .. lightingheapproved. building ,- egetation include native bushes. 4. Meturb be pidued on the building. n ThA fire+ 2n' of the drivaWaT mint Maintain a maximum 4% slope and 10% for the rest of the driveway. 6. Prior to any site disturbance, a construction fence be placed along the south property line of the site. 7. All engineering concerns be addressed prior to issuance of a building permit. 8. A revised landscape plan be brought back at a future date with the addition of trees or tall shrubs. W ^I 1 0 ' n � 0 I ay. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT July 5, 1994 Lot 413, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision Bober Residence Final Design Review PROJECT TYPE: Single Family ZONING: PUD, One Unit COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES INTRODUCTION: Mr. and Mrs. Andrew Bober have submitted an application for final design review of a single family residence on Lot 43, Block 3, which is .71 acres in size. The single family unit will contain three levels and stand approximately 32'. The single family unit will consist of the following materials: The landscape plan includes the following. Spruce 4 5-7 Aspen 8 2" caliper Spirea 8 5 gallon Mugho Pine 3 5 gallon Approximately 100 yards of sod is proposed Disturbed areas will be revegetated with native grasses and bushes. An automatic irrigation system is proposed. REVIEW HISTORY At the April 5, 1994 Planning and Zoning meeting the Commission commented on the following: ■ overhangs out of place, ■ deck railing, ■ use of Flagstone and stucco, Materials Color _ Roof asphalt shingles dark brown Siding cement stucco buff Fascia r.s. cedar light brown Soffits r.s. cedar plywood buff Window clad wood white Window Trim 20 stucco relief not indicated Door vinyl clad sandstone Hand/Deck Rads pressure treated light brown Flues clay Flashings metal brown Chimney stone buff The landscape plan includes the following. Spruce 4 5-7 Aspen 8 2" caliper Spirea 8 5 gallon Mugho Pine 3 5 gallon Approximately 100 yards of sod is proposed Disturbed areas will be revegetated with native grasses and bushes. An automatic irrigation system is proposed. REVIEW HISTORY At the April 5, 1994 Planning and Zoning meeting the Commission commented on the following: ■ overhangs out of place, ■ deck railing, ■ use of Flagstone and stucco, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT July 5, 1994 Lot 43, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision Bober Residence Final Design Review ■ backing and turning areas for cars; ■ banding around the house; ■ location of the garages, • style not a mountain home; ■ north elevation being blank; and ■ good landscape plan make interesting. STAFF COMMENTS: Certain areas on the site may contain slopes in excess of the maximum of 2:1. Staff would like the applicant to aware that siopes in excess of 2:1 are not allowed. The landscape plan must meet the minimum standards, which are minimum 6' for coniferous plant, 2" minimum caliper for deciduous trees and 5 gallon for shrubs. The lightirg has not be indicated. The applicant must work out any Engineering concerns prior to the issuance of a building permit. DESIGN REVIEW CONSIDERATIONS: The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of this project: Conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable regulations of the Town. Comment: This proposal is in conformance with Town codes. The suitability of the improvement, including type and quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located. Comment: The type and quality of proposed building and landscape materials are consistent with Town guidelines. The compatibility of tl:e design to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties. Comment: All impacts will be contained on site. The compatibility of the proposed improvements with site topography. Comment: The design minimize the impact to the site. The visual appearance of vny proposed improvement as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT July 5, 1994 Lot 43, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision Bober Residence Final Design Review Comment: The visual appearance of the proposed improvements will not negatively impact neighboring properties or public ways. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. Comment: The proposal meets the objective of this guideline. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. Comment: The proposal is in conformance with the goals, policies and programs for the Town of Avon. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this final design review with the following conditions: 1. The flues, flashings and vents be painted to match the color scheme of the building. 2. The building lighting be approved by staff prior to issuance of a building permit. 3. Revegetation include native bushes. 4. Meters be placed on the building. 5. Prior to any site disturbance, a construction/erosion control fence be placed on site 6. Landscape plan meet the minimum Town of Avon standards. 7. All engineering concerns be addressed prior to the issuance of a building permit. RECOMMENDED ACTION: I. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission A,^tion Respectfully Submitted Mary Holden Town Planner PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT July 5, 1994 Lot 43, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision Bober Residence Final Design Review PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( vl� Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date a !9 Sue Railton, Secretary 0 / I fit. -- Tha rnmmicc;nn grantad final design_review approval with the following conditions: 1. The tlues,t1ashingS an ven s be painted o match the culur sclime of the building. 2. The building lighting be approved by Staff prior to issuance of a 3. Revegetation include native bushes. 4. Meters be placed on the building. 5. Prior to any site disturbance, a construction/erosion control fence be placed on site. 6. Landscape plan meet the minimum Town of Avon standards. 7. All engineering concerns be addressed prior to the issuance of a building permit. 8. An actual roof sample and a revised landscape plan be brought back at a future date. or r 0 m 9 PLANNING AND "ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT June 7, 1994 Lot 24, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision Ray Duplex Final Design Review PROJECT TYPE: Duplex ZONING: PUD., Duplex COMPLIES WITH ZONING? INTRODUCTION: Bruce Canton and Mike Ray have submitted an application for Final Design Review of a duplex Lot 24, Block 2, Wildridge. The lot, .50 acres in size, slopes down to the west at 16%. The building height is approximately 30 1/2'. The units will consist of the following materials: A landscape pla-it list has been included in your packet. REVIEW HISTORY The Commission reviewed this application at the May 17, and the June 7, 1994 meetings and discussed the following: I . the architectural connection; 2. large area of asphalt; 3. landscape plan inadequate, 4. exact same units being boring, 5. massing of the building, 6. moving the buildings closer together; 7. stronger connection, 8. consider raising one unit; and 9. linear look in roof not there with the off sets. Materials Colors Roof GAF 320# burnt sienna Siding cedar Moorwood, 08164 Other stucco Pure ivory Fascia 2x 10 Moorwood Soffits wood Moorwood Window eagle clad casement Forest green Window `Crim 3x wood lintel Moorwood Door wood plank Moorwood Door Trim wood lintel/stucco Moorwood or pure ivory Hand/Deck Rails cedar same Flues/Flashings metal match adjacent wall Chimney stucco pure ivory A landscape pla-it list has been included in your packet. REVIEW HISTORY The Commission reviewed this application at the May 17, and the June 7, 1994 meetings and discussed the following: I . the architectural connection; 2. large area of asphalt; 3. landscape plan inadequate, 4. exact same units being boring, 5. massing of the building, 6. moving the buildings closer together; 7. stronger connection, 8. consider raising one unit; and 9. linear look in roof not there with the off sets. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT July 5, 1994 Lot 24, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision Ray Duplex Final Design Review STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has moved the buildings closer and added a shared roof form over the entry ways. The grading plan, which is not certified, does not show the tie in with June Creek Trail Road. The grading plan, also shows, site disturbance taking place from lot line to lot line. To ensure no encroachments take place on adjacent properties, a construction fence must be placed on site to delineate property lines. The applicant should be aware that engineering conct ms if any arise must be addressed prior to the issuance of a building permit. There is still a potential for snow shedding in front of the garage on the northwest elevation. DESIGN REVIEW CONSIDERATIONS;. The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of this project: Conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable regulations of the Town. Comment: This proposal is similar to other projects approved by the Commission which were in conformance with Town codes. The suitability of the improvement, including type and quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located. Comment: The type and quality of proposed building and landscape materials are consistent with Town guidelines. The compatibility of the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties. Comment: All impacts will be contained on site. The compatibility of the proposed improvements with site topography. Comment: The design of the proposed improvements will create more impact to the site than the conventional duplex design The visual appearance of any proposed improvement as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. 2 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT July 5, 1994 Lot 24, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision Ray Duplex Final Design Review Comment: The visual appearance of the proposed improvements will not negatively impact neighboring properties or public ways. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. Comment: The proposal meets the objective of this guideline. The general confom-.-re of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs cor the Town of Avon. Comment: The proposal is similar to other projects approved by the Commission which were in conformance with the goals, policies and programs for the Town of Avon. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Should the Commission decide there is a strong architectural connection and approve [his application, Staff recommends the following conditions: I. The flues, flashings and vents be painted to match the color scheme of the building. 2. Meters be placed on the building. 3. The first 20' of the driveway must maintain a maximum 4% slope. 4. Prior to any site disturbance, a construction/erosion control fence be placed on site. 5. The applicant address any engineering concerns prior to the issuance of a building permit. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully Submitted —1/1-1 lin. Mary Hol len Town Planner 3 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT July 5, 1994 Lot 24, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision Ray Duplex Final Design Review PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) i Approved with modified conditions (✓f Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date J61 � gte- Sue Railton, Secretary�L�e, The Commission granted final design reviewapproval with the followin4 conditions: 1. ues, flashings and vents be painted match the building. 2. Meters be placed on the building. 3. The first 20' of the driveway must maintain a maximum 4% slope. irlor To any site disturbance, a cons truct! onjerus I on control fence be placed on site. 5. The applicant address any engineering concerns prior to the issuance of a building permit. 6. A strong suggestion that a planting bed of some sort be placed around the front entry between the buildings and the asphalt. 4 P y 0 0 Fal 0 • a 04 r II I I I I I I I I I I I -I I I I I �I II II II I� II JI �1 antList 'common Name Botaame 15•1bgal. 10 Juniperus.Horizontalis Blue Chip Jumper "Blue Chip" . 1. Deciduous Shrubs lAmelanchier . Service Berry 5 a� �D t Artemisia Tridentata '� .Tall Western Sage 5gal. 1 r Mountain Mahogany r ,;� Covers 21/4' pots ¢ Anten_inaa Ra Rosea Pussy Toes ,t w I ner Cerastium Tomentosum Goldmoss Stoecrop Sedum Acre } Sedum'Dragons Blood' Dragons Blood RativeGrasses ��°cahpCf rnttt� - n g � �`;`�;�, ►frrtu,ott� L � fop�lLW p.rtglf5l't�olia �� IRECEIV E® JOIN 2 g 1994 WMMUNIN DEVELOPMENT PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT July 5, 1994 Lot 37, Block 1, %+'iidridge Subdivision Shearwood Duplex Conceptual Design Review PROJECT TYPE: Duplex ZONING: PUD, Duplex COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES INTRODUCTION: An application for Conceptual Design Review nf a rh�olex on Lot 37, Block 1, Wildridge has been submitted by Shearwood Homes. The tot is .48 acres in si .e, and slopes can not be determined since a topography has not been submitted. The building will contain two levels and stand approximately 29 1/2' tall. Tne duplexes will consist of the following materials: Roof Siding Other Fascia Soffits Window Door Door Trim Hand/Deck Rails Flues/Flashings Chimney Materials Colors asphalt grown 3/4 lap beige/Ight brown stucco off white 2x 10 w/ 1 x4 shing!e brown 1/4 cedar ply brown weathered shield alum. clad brown solid wood panel brown brick brown redwood picket natural V&Z metal not indicated stucco 11 A landscape plan has not been indicated. STAFF COMMENTS: Site Plan. 1 An accurate grading and drainage plan, on a certified topography, showing: a. true limits of site disturbance, b the rights-of-way; c. all easements, d. s, '-3cks, and e utility connections Revegetation of al! jismi bed areas is required, and should include native bushes, and Design: 1. Colors need to be called out on fne elevations, W PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT July 5, 1994 Lot 37, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Shearwood Duplex Conceptual Design Veview 2. The type of fireplace needs to be indicated; and 3. Exterior building lighting must be indicated on the elevations submitted for FDR. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: As a conceptual review, the Staff has no formal recommendation. Respectfully Submitted Mary Hold' Town Planner PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recomraend.d conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ✓j Date Yt�G�, �, /Qq*_Sue Railton, Secretary_ As a"Jccooncep�tua1 d/esign review, no formal asction was taken at this time. TTe Commission was g— en Ty supportive o this project, with some comments made regarding good landscaping, especially around the asphalt area and the rear 1 two c pa x \ o� W � U Y� Y f ro \ O +. J two c pa 1 E , :,* i N 10 W EL 0 J N J W 0 O Z 9 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT July 5, 1994 Lot 12, Block 1, Eenchmark at Beaver Creek Valley Wide Final Design Review -Modifications ?ROJECT TYPE: Industrial/Office Building ZONING: IC COMPLIES WITH ZONING.? YES INTRODUCTION: Valle) Wide Mechanical is requesting approval of different paint color and a change in the form of the canopy over the door. STAFF COMMENTS: The original colors approved were canyon gray with a redrock stucco. The proposed colors are a burgundy -brown and off white. The change to the canopy is enclosed in your packet along with the original approved style. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission approve this application as presented. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation. 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Mary Holden Town Planner PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT July 5, 1994 Lot 12, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Valley Wide Final Design Review -Modifications PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Der;ed Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date 5 19 Sue Railton, Secretary The Commission voted to deny the request for the moc(itications which means it has to be built according to approved plans, including the paint color and the entry elemeiA and all other aspects of the originally approved plans. 0