PZC Packet 120120Notice Avon Notice of Regular Avon Planning and
Zoning Commission Meeting
December 1, 2020 at 5:00 p.m. MST
WEBINAR MEETING ONLY
Avon Town Hall operations are limited due to COVID-19
pandemic health orders to restrict gatherings.
Physical attendance of the Avon Planning and Zoning
meeting is not allowed.
Please go to Avon.org the day of the meeting or register at
https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_L8mW8d6YSoK
owqBd_jFpGw and join. You can also find the agenda and
meeting packet materials for the meeting under Government >
Planning & Zoning Commission > Agendas, Packets &
Materials.
______________________________________________________________________________
MEETING AGENDAS AND PACKETS ARE FOUND AT: WWW.AVON.ORG
AGENDAS WERE POSTED AT AVON TOWN HALL, AVON RECREATION CENTER, AVON ELEMENTARY AND AVON PUBLIC LIBRARY.
IF YOU HAVE ANY SPECIAL ACCOMMODATION NEEDS, PLEASE, IN ADVANCE OF THE MEETING,
CALL TOWN PLANNER DAVID MCWILLIAMS AT 970-748-4023 OR EMAIL CMCWILLIAMS@AVON.ORG WITH ANY SPECIAL REQUESTS. 1
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2020
MEETING BEGINS AT 5:00 PM
VIRTUAL MEETING ONLY
1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL (CHAIRPERSON HARDY)
2. ELECTION OF NEW PZC CHAIRPERSON AND VICE-CHAIR
3. APPOINTMENT OF NEW PZC REPRESENTATIVE TO THE VILLAGE AT AVON DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
5. DISCLOSURE OF ANY CONFLICTS OF INTEREST OR EX-PARTE COMMUNICATION RELATED TO AGENDA ITEMS
6. CONSENT AGENDA
6.1. NOVEMBER 17, 2020 MEETING MINUTES 6.2. TMP20002 - 042 RIVERFRONT LANE DIRT STORAGE 6.3. TMP20003 – UNADDRESSED SWIFT GULCH SNOW STORAGE 6.4. TMP20004 – 82 BEAVER CREEK BOULEVARD OUTDOOR SEATING
7. BUSINESS ITEMS
7.1. VILLAGE AT AVON – PLANNING AREA J – DESIGN REVIEW REFERRAL - PROPOSAL FOR A NEW GAS STATION.
THE VILLAGE AT AVON PUD REQUIRES PZC REFERRAL FOR LAND USE DECISIONS OF THIS TYPE. THE
DISCUSSION WILL FOCUS ON STAFF’S ANALYSIS ON THE VILLAGE AT AVON’S DESIGN GUIDELINES AND PZC’S
SUBSEQUENT REFERRAL LETTER.
8. CAPACITY BUILDING SEMINAR – AVON COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
9. STAFF UPDATES 10. ADJOURN
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 17, 2020
1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
Chairperson Lindsay Hardy called the regular meeting to order at 5:02 p.m. A roll call was taken, and Planning
Commission members present were Rebecca Smith, Jared Barnes, Donna Lang, Sara Lanious, and Steve
Nusbaum. Also present were Town Planner David McWilliams, Planning Director Matt Pielsticker, and Haley
Cramer with Garfield Hecht.
2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Action: Commissioner Barnes motioned to approve the agenda. Commissioner Lang seconded the motion and it
carried unanimously 6-0.
3. DISCLOSURE OF ANY CONFLICTS OF INTEREST OR EX-PARTE COMMUNICATION RELATED TO AGENDA ITEMS
Commissioners Smith noted a conflict with item 4.2. Commissioner Hardy motioned to accept the conflict.
Commissioner Lanious seconded the motion and it carried unanimously 5-0.
Commissioner Hardy noted a conflict with item 4.2. Commissioner Nusbaum motioned to accept the conflict.
Commissioner Lanious seconded the motion and it carried unanimously 5-0.
4. BUSINESS ITEMS
4.1. 4311 EAGLEBEND DRIVE – TRACT A AND LOT 1 FILING 2 EAGLEBEND SUBDIVISION – PUBLIC HEARING –
PROPOSAL TO AMEND THE SIZE OF TRACT A AND LOT 1 AND REVISE THE LOT LINES OF LOT 1 TO
ACCOMMODATE AN ADDITION. (TOWN PLANNER DAVID MCWILLIAMS & ANGELO VERALDI AND JENNA
SKINNER)
At roughly 5:36 the meeting connection was interrupted. The meeting was restarted once all the Commissioners
and the public returned, roughly at 5:44, and Jena Skinner continued her presentation.
Public Comment: Walter Dandy commented on the application.
Action: Commissioner Barnes motioned to continue the item to December 15, 2020. Commissioner Smith seconded
the motion and it carried unanimously 6-0.
4.2. 42 RIVERFRONT LANE – LOT 1 RIVERFRONT SUBDIVISION – PUBLIC HEARING – PROPOSAL FOR DIRT
STORAGE ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION FOR THE WINTER. (TOWN PLANNER DAVID MCWILLIAMS &
ANDY HALMINSKI WITH EVANS CHAFFEE)
Action: Commissioner Nusbaum motioned to approve the item with the following findings and conditions:
Findings:
1. The application qualifies as a Temporary Use Permit subject to review according to §7.16.020 of
the Development Code;
2. The application is complete;
3. The application provides sufficient information to allow PZC to determine that the application
complies with the relevant review criteria;
4. The application complies with the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan; and
5. There is no extra demand for public services or infrastructure exceeding current capacity by the
application.
Conditions:
1. The approval is valid until May 15, 2021;
2. The site shall be restored to original grade and vegetation once the dirt is moved; and
3. Silt fencing is required around the entire pile, except for the entry; and
4. This temporary application is associated with the Riverfront Lot 6 and 7 buildings – permits
RBP20004-20007. Successful maintenance of Lot 1 is required for continued Town administration
of these permits.
Commissioner Lanious seconded the motion and it carried unanimously 4-0.
Commissioner Smith left the meeting.
4.3. UNADDRESSED SWIFT GULCH ROAD - TRACT E FILING, 3 VILLAGE AT AVON SUBDIVISION – PUBLIC HEARING – PROPOSAL FOR SNOW STORAGE ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION FOR THE WINTER. (TOWN
PLANNER DAVID MCWILLIAMS & JEFF SCHNEIDER WITH ERWSD)
Action: Commissioner Nusbaum motioned to approve the item with the following findings and conditions:
Findings:
1. The application qualifies as a Temporary Use Permit subject to review according to §7.16.020 of
the Development Code;
2. The application is complete;
3. The application provides sufficient information to allow PZC to determine that the application
complies with the relevant review criteria;
4. The application complies with the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan; and
5. There is no extra demand for public services or infrastructure exceeding current capacity by the
application.
Conditions:
1. The approval is valid for one calendar year, with the condition that Staff approve the mitigation
efforts conducted in spring 2021;
2. The site shall be restored to original grade and vegetation; and
3. Access to the site is only allowed from the east. Snow storage vehicles must go east on US 6 to
Post Boulevard to access the site.
Commissioner Nusbaum seconded the motion and it carried unanimously 5-0.
4.4. 82 BEAVER CREEK BOULEVARD – TRACT Q BLOCK 2 BENCHMARK AT BEAVER CREEK SUBDIVISION – PUBLIC HEARING – PROPOSAL FOR OUTDOOR SEATING AND DINING, OCCUPYING TWO (2) PARKING SPACES
IN THE JUNCTION BUILDING PARKING LOT FOR THE WINTER. (TOWN PLANNER DAVID MCWILLIAMS & KERRI
THELEN WITH EIN PROSIT)
Action: Commissioner Nusbaum motioned to approve the item with the following findings and conditions:
Findings:
1. The application qualifies as a Temporary Use Permit subject to review according to §7.16.020 of
the Development Code;
2. The application is complete;
3. The application provides sufficient information to allow PZC to determine that the application
complies with the relevant review criteria;
4. The application complies with the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan; and
5. There is no extra demand for public services or infrastructure exceeding current capacity by the
application.
Conditions:
1. The approval is valid until November 17, 2021, or occupancy of the old Montana’s Restaurant
location, whichever is sooner; and
2. A liquor license modification will be approved before serving clients in the temporary area.
Commissioner Nusbaum seconded the motion and it carried unanimously 5-0.
5. CONSENT AGENDA 5.1. OCTOBER 6, 2020 MEETING MINUTES
5.2. MNR20038 & AEC20007 MINOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND ALTERNATIVE EQUIVALENT COMPLIANCE 5161
LONGSUN LANE 5.3. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL – MJR2005 – 4.1. 358 & 368 RIVERFRONT LANE LANDSCAPING
Action: Commissioner Barnes motioned to approve the consent agenda. Commissioner Nusbaum seconded the
motion and it carried unanimously 5-0.
6. STAFF UPDATES
Staff mentioned some software updates, future meeting items, and development projects in Town.
7. ADJOURN
There being no further business before the Commission adjourned the meeting at 7:20 p.m.
These meeting minutes are only a summary of the proceedings of the meeting. They are not intended to be
comprehensive or to include each statement, person speaking or to portray with complete accuracy. The most accurate
records of the meeting are the audio of the meeting, which is housed in the Town Clerk' s office.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED:
_________________________________
David McWilliams, Town Planner
APPROVED:
__________________________________
Lindsay Hardy, Chairperson
PZC Record of Decision: #TMP20002 Page 1 of 1
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECORD OF DECISION
DATE OF DECISION: November 17, 2020
TYPE OF APPLICATION: Temporary Use Permit
PROPERTY LOCATION: Lot 1 Riverfront Subdivision
FILE NUMBER: TMP20002
APPLICANT: Andy Halminski with Evans Chaffee
Owner: EW Riverfront East Investor LLC
This Record of Decision is made in accordance with the Avon Development Code (“Development Code”) §7.16.020:
DECISION: Approval of the temporary use plan with the following findings and conditions:
FINDINGS: 1. The application qualifies as a Temporary Use Permit subject to review according to §7.16.020 of the Development Code; 2. The application is complete; 3. The application provides sufficient information to allow PZC to determine that the application complies with the relevant review criteria; 4. The application complies with the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan; and 5. There is no extra demand for public services or infrastructure exceeding current capacity by the application.
CONDITIONS: 1. The approval is valid until May 15, 2021; 2. The site shall be restored to original grade and vegetation once the dirt is moved; and 3. Silt fencing is required around the entire pile, except for the entry; and 4. This temporary application is associated with the Riverfront Lot 6 and 7 buildings – permits RBP20004 - 20007. Successful maintenance of Lot 1 is required for continued Town administration of these permits.
THESE FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECORD OF DECISION ARE HEREBY APPROVED:
BY:______________________________________ DATE: ___________________ PZC Chairperson
PZC Record of Decision: #TMP20003 Page 1 of 1
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECORD OF DECISION
DATE OF DECISION: November 17, 2020
TYPE OF APPLICATION: Temporary Use Permit
PROPERTY LOCATION: Tract E Filing 3 Block 2 Village at Avon Subdivision
FILE NUMBER: TMP20003
APPLICANT: Jeff Schneider with ERWSD
Owner: Eagle River Fire Protection District
This Record of Decision is made in accordance with the Avon Development Code (“Development Code”) §7.16.020:
DECISION: Approval of the temporary use plan with the following findings and conditions:
FINDINGS: 1. The application qualifies as a Temporary Use Permit subject to review according to §7.16.020 of the Development Code; 2. The application is complete; 3. The application provides sufficient information to allow PZC to determine that the application complies with the relevant review criteria; 4. The application complies with the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan; and 5. There is no extra demand for public services or infrastructure exceeding current capacity by the application.
CONDITIONS: 1. The approval is valid for one calendar year, with the condition that Staff approve the mitigation efforts conducted in spring 2021; 2. The site shall be restored to original grade and vegetation; and 3. Access to the site is only allowed from the east. Snow storage vehicles must go east on US 6 to Post Boulevard to access the site.
THESE FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECORD OF DECISION ARE HEREBY APPROVED:
BY:______________________________________ DATE: ___________________ PZC Chairperson
PZC Record of Decision: #TMP20004 Page 1 of 1
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECORD OF DECISION
DATE OF DECISION: November 17, 2020
TYPE OF APPLICATION: Temporary Use Permit
PROPERTY LOCATION: Tract Q Block 2 Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision
FILE NUMBER: TMP20004
APPLICANT: Kerri Thelen
Owner: CSB Properties Holdings, LLC
This Record of Decision is made in accordance with the Avon Development Code (“Development Code”) §7.16.020:
DECISION: Approval of the development plan with the following findings and conditions:
FINDINGS: 1. The application qualifies as a Temporary Use Permit subject to review according to §7.16.020 of the Development Code; 2. The application is complete; 3. The application provides sufficient information to allow PZC to determine that the application complies with the relevant review criteria; 4. The application complies with the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan; and 5. There is no extra demand for public services or infrastructure exceeding current capacity by the application.
CONDITIONS: 1. The approval is valid until November 17, 2021, or occupancy of the old Montana’s Restaurant location, whichever is sooner; and 2. A liquor license modification will be approved before serving clients in the temporary area.
THESE FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECORD OF DECISION ARE HEREBY APPROVED:
BY:______________________________________ DATE: ___________________ PZC Chairperson
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: David McWilliams, AICP, Town Planner
RE: Service Station on Avon Landing Block 1, Village at Avon
DATE: November 20, 2020
STAFF REPORT OVERVIEW: This memo contains preliminary design material for a new service station in
the Village (at Avon) (VAA) for referral from the VAA Design Review Board (DRB) to the Planning and Zoning
Commission (PZC). While this potential project is not subject to a majority of sections in Chapter 7 of Avon
Development Code (ADC) and will not be subject to the formal Town of Avon review process outlined within
it, PZC is tasked with formulating comments that the DRB can use for their formal review. Per the Design
Guidelines in the Planned Unit Development (PUD), “The DRB shall refer to the Town of Avon's Planning
and Zoning Commission, for comment only, and not for approval or disapproval, Development proposals
submitted to the DRB.”
The proposal is approaching a completed
application for the DRB, and this may be PZC’s only
review of the project. Two documents guide this
project: The Village (at Avon) Design Guidelines,
dated October 1, 2018, (Design Guidelines), and
Village (at Avon) DRB Guide (DRB Guide) describe
the desired aesthetic of all projects and articulate
aspirations rather than hard requirements. Staff
crafted specific recommendations, based on these
documents, for PZC’s consideration to relay to the
DRB. This report seeks to address common design
considerations that would be contained in any development application, through that lens. This is one of the
first buildings proposed on the north side of I-70 in the VAA and Staff expects more. The discussion points
presented are contextualized for one use and building among a network of spaces that operate within a
unified design framework for visual harmony.
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: The site location is in Planning
Area J of the VAA, situated north of I-70 and adjacent to Post
Boulevard. The PUD permits the proposed use on Planning Area
J. It is largely shielded from I-70 views by grade changes and
berms. The site is visible from above, and future development
will look down upon this site.
Staff expects an administrative Subdivision application to be
presented, creating the site’s land and additional lots.
PROCESS SUMMARY: A preliminary development application is in front of the VAA DRB. Per the Design
Guidelines, after referral to PZC, the DRB can formally approve or deny the project. As processed in the
past with the Avon Apartments, Staff recommends an in-depth discussion at the December 1st meeting. Staff
will return to PZC at the following meeting with revised comments based upon discussion, to formally transmit
to the Village DRB.
PLANNING ANALYSIS: Most sections below start with quoted text from DRB Guide to frame the elements
of importance. The Design Guide is also quoted, noted with “(Design Guide)” at the end. All text is unmodified
in formatting, except for italicized portions added for emphasis by Staff.
Allowed Use and Density: As noted above, this commercial use is explicitly allowed in Planning Area J.
Lot Coverage, Setback and Easements: The property appears to be compliant with all applicable
coverage, setback, and easement requirements. Front: 20’ Side: 0’ Rear: 10”
Building Height: The PUD allows up to 48’ and this building was not analyzed for height.
DESIGN ANALYSIS:
Design Theme: “In order to create a unique, pedestrian friendly, vibrant, successful, and long lasting town
that enriches the quality of life and maximizes/enhances and preserves the value of the Property, the design
of all Development within the Village must, among other things, distinguish itself by being unique, sustainable,
interesting, attractive, and must respect the mountain setting as well as complement the surrounding
Development within the Village. The Overall Design Theme (hereinafter referred to as the “Design Theme”)
is to establish an attractive appearance for visitors and residents and yet be flexible enough to allow for
affordable design solutions.”
“The attractive appearance expected for Development consists of, among other things, innovative and
attractive architecture that promotes sustainable ideas and is sensitive to the surrounding area.”
“The DRB shall not accept exceptions to the Design Theme and Design Philosophy that break the pattern of
unique and attractive architecture for Development at the Village, as any exceptions will negatively impact
the Village and will promote unattractive architecture for Development in the future.”
Staff Response: Overall, the project presents a perfunctory nod to the Design Theme language, and there
are few discernable elements of mountain aesthetic. More natural muted tones, building articulation,
interactive windows, and innovative design are suggested to respect the mountain setting and create visual
interest. For example, the fuel pump canopy can be made more visually interesting by shape and design, to
better reflect the local mountain aesthetic.
Service Station Standards: ADC includes a specific section for service stations, and Staff sees value in
including the language:
(i) A fuel pump canopy shall utilize the same architectural design and materials as the principal
building on the lot.
(ii) Light fixtures mounted under canopies shall be cut-off and shielded so that there is no glare
or light spillage at the property line. Lights and fixtures shall not extend below the surface of
the ceiling of the canopy.
(iii) Lights shall not be mounted on the top or sides (fascias) of the canopy and shall not be
externally illuminated, except as part of an internally illuminated sign that meets the
standards of Chapter 15.28, Sign Code.
The canopy has few design features that tie it to the store. No lighting cut sheet was provided, so Staff cannot
comment on the potential glare of the lighting, but they do appear flush mounted. Staff recommends that the
light fixture temperature and intensity be carefully reviewed in order to control unanticipated impacts. The
canopy may be visible from Interstate 70 given the site’s location perched above the elevation of the highway.
There is no sign design cut sheet, either.
Easements, Drainage, Retaining Walls: Staff is working directly with the DRB for some clarification at this
stage. There are few retaining walls with this development proposal. The drainage study is being finalized to
demonstrate how the adjacent detention pond can accommodate future uphill development.
View from Post Boulevard and I-70 roundabout. The site is bermed from 2 sides and elevated above I-70.
Parking: In Planning Area J, “underground parking is highly encouraged. However, if the Owner can show
that the Design Philosophy is still achieved with surface parking, the DRB is willing to consider waiving this
requirement.” While not underground, the berms surrounding the property appear to screen surface parking
spots.
Staff Response: This proposal includes a 4,425 square foot building. 31 parking spaces (not including the
fill-up areas) are proposed, equating to 7 spaces per 1,000 square feet of commercial space. The PUD
requires 2 spaces per 11,000 square feet of Gross Square footage, although that number might be a typo.
While the PUD includes parking minimums, it does not include maximums. Using ADC’s standard, the parking
maximum should be roughly 22 spaces. Staff encourages a discussion if the parking allocation could help
achieve design goals. Per AMC Sec. 15.28, 6 electric vehicle capable, 4 electric vehicle ready, and 2 electric
vehicle installed spaces must be present on this site.
Access Drive and Street Front: “Access to the building sites will require careful consideration of, among
other things, the existing topography, buildings’ solar orientation, and the integration of the present and future
public vehicular and pedestrian systems.”
“All entryways should: provide a sheltered transition to the inside; offer visual clues as to the desired
pedestrian circulation; possess inviting features; address the street; relate, in both scale and design style, to
the use of the Building.”
“North facing entries and outdoor spaces should be carefully considered because of winter conditions.”
“All doorway and entryways must provide protection from sloughing snow or ice, be well lit without light
pollution, and offer a spot for pedestrians and bicycle traffic to gather.”
“Avoiding the sea of asphalt feel is something that can provide interest to a project at the same time as
benefiting the environment.” (Design Guide)
Staff Response: Access to the property is limited to the location proposed due to existing topography and
road design. The building’s orientation and subsequent design choices stem from these limitations. Patrons
will be afforded sweeping views from this location, although views from within the store will be minimal. There
is a “sea of asphalt” feel in this application.
There is a proposed walkway from Post Boulevard to the heart of the site. Staff suggests striping or
differentiation in materials for the walkway to indicate the pedestrian crossing of the site’s drive lane. There is
no sidewalk proposed on the northeast side of the property since the main east/west pedestrian connection is
planned for the north side of Swift Gulch road. The walkway directly in front of the building entry is
approximately 10 feet wide. There is no proposed bicycle parking or treatments.
The building’s entrance faces northeast and it appears that other than asphalt and concrete, there are no
treatments for winter conditions. Steel awnings are present on the site plan, but their size, aesthetic, and
functionality are perhaps more appropriate in another environment.
Overall, the deviation from the DRB Guide language is concerning to Staff.
Landscaping: “Acceptable landscape design will, among other things; retain and promote as much healthy
native vegetation as practical, encourage creativity and personalized design of the landscaping, conserve
water by creating landscapes where water-wise plants predominate, minimize the use of water-heavy plants
and limit water-heavy plants to specific focal areas, limit total irrigation coverage using microclimate responsive
design of irrigation systems and their conscientious operation, eradicate and prevent noxious weed
infestations, minimize site grading, take into consideration the location and impact on the surrounding area,
and respect and enhance the design of the streetscapes.”
“The minimum landscaped area required is equal to 20% of the gross site area less the footprint of all
approved Buildings.”
“Any area outside the approved area of construction disturbance is deemed a natural area and is to remain
in its natural state.”
“Maximum site coverage for all Buildings is 30% or as the DRB recommends. Maximum site coverage for all
impervious materials is 50% or as the DRB recommends.”
“Surrounding the Buildings and along the public ways (and within ROW), landscape plantings, walks, public
lighting, site furnishings, and signage shall create a year-round synergetic, coherent, and environmentally
friendly and festive atmosphere.”
“Irrigation is required in all formal landscaped areas.” (Design Guide)
“All planted areas should not exceed a maximum slope of 2:1 with a minimum of two percent (2%). All grass
areas should not exceed a slope of 4:1 with a minimum of two percent (2%).”( Design Guide)
Staff Response: The project proposes a Landscape Area of 22,454 square feet but does not provide the
calculation required to confirm conformance with the DRB Guide and PUD, above. Impervious coverage is
not included in this application, and Staff also suggests its inclusion.
There is landscaping on property proposed to be subdivided and therefore out of the applicant’s control. Staff
is working with the DRB to confirm continued maintenance.
Staff suggests the inclusion of an irrigation plan that conforms with the PUD and DRB Guide language. A
slope analysis for landscaping might also be pertinent to assess for conformance with the PUD and DRB
Guide. Amending tree soils to achieve a minimum planting hole diameter two (2) times as large as the root
ball diameter, with at least 5% organic matter is a best practice and should be achieved.
Four-sided Design: The DRB Guide do not contain any four-sided design suggestions.
Staff Response: PZC has paid careful attention to Four-Sided Design in recent development applications
but it is not part of these Design Guidelines. Staff recommends assessing the function and the appearance
of the building from all sides.
Building Design, Building Materials and Colors: “Articulation in Building planes should be of a magnitude
and dimension that is consistent with the overall scale and massing of the Building, as well as the intent in
design and appearance.”
Staff Response: Staff is concerned that the building presents as a continuous mass, with only a cursory nod
to articulation with the raised roof form over the entrance.
Scale and Massing: “All Buildings must face the street and take suitable measures to minimize its impact on
all visible facades.
“It is encouraged to use elements to break down the out of human scale and boxy architecture and create
interest. Covered circulation, shading devices, canopies, Building entries can all be used to accomplish this.
The Wal-Mart and The Home Depot canopy design are the standard for diffusing the standard box architecture.
Passive solar design as a component of the architectural design of individual Buildings is encouraged.”
Staff Response: The building is boxy, and there is no nod to passive solar design. Design elements to diffuse
the architecture and embrace the mountain environment are encouraged. The canopy supports are a nod to
the Wal-Mart and Home Depot design, but further work to tie the building together is suggested.
Windows: “Windows create interest in Building facades and communicate the type of Building and activities
that are present. Windows may act as a lantern, establishing activity and vibrancy in the evening streetscape.”
Staff Response: The windows do not create interest and are minimized to the north elevation. Additional
window articulation is suggested despite conflicts with interior uses.
Roof Material, Pitch and Pedestrian Protection: “Each Building should utilize green roof technologies while
creating a unique expression of quality. It is strongly recommended that all primary roofs are to be “green
roofs” or “grass roofs” simple in form and skyline. Roofs may be exterior usable space or a site for photovoltaic
or hydronic collectors.”
Staff Response: There does not appear to be any green aspect to the roofing. Staff would appreciate some
nod to the design guidelines. The single pitched roof does not satisfy this design guideline and is not located
above the pedestrian entrances to provide any weather protection.
Trash Storage: “Service areas, such as loading bays, recycling areas, dumpsters, compactors, storage
areas and large utility equipment (including ground mounted equipment such as power transformers and air
handling equipment), must be enclosed, screened, or located such that they are not visible from the streets
and adjacent land uses such as pedestrian access ways so that they do not negatively impact the Village by
being in the public view.”
Staff Response: There is a proposed dumpster on the far southern corner of the property. It might be
prominent from Swift Gulch Road or the adjacent property. Staff encourages a design sheet that adheres to
the above guidelines and provides adequate recycling provisions. It must be bear-proof per AMC Sec.
8.32.080 by having a roof and a locking door.
Exterior Lighting: “Nighttime lighting on a site shall be designed to minimize glare, light trespass and light
pollution and to conserve energy and maintain night-time safety.” (Design Guide)
Staff Response: A lighting plan is not included for review. Staff suggests including a plan for review and
that the lighting does not cause glare or trespass. Of particular concern is the number and intensity of canopy
light fixtures.
Snow Removal: “Snow piles are unsightly, are hazards to traffic that can block ingress and egress and view
corridors, cause safety issues, cause potential fire hazards, and do not conform to the Design Philosophy.”
Staff Response: The snow storage areas proposed are adequate for the site.
Bicycle Facilities, Mobility and Connectivity: “The Village will share common connectors of vehicular and
pedestrian traffic. These links will be connections of similar design details, utilizing both natural and man
made design elements.”
“Properties must include continued paths, as they cross the landscaped property. This should include a
continued theme of plantings that co-exist with existing landscapes along the walking paths. Also, to be
included are benches and/or other rest areas for pedestrians, as necessary. Also to be considered are
storage areas and equipment for bicycles and other alternative transportation.”
“The carefully planned transition between auto and pedestrian is an important element that encourages the
use of convenient parking and inviting pedestrian paths.”
Staff Response: Vehicles and pedestrian connections are separated in this application. There is no
proposed sidewalk along Swift Gulch Road. The pedestrian entry path is appreciated, but Staff encourages
more permeability by also including a sidewalk. This is the first of many developments in the area, and this
area deserves a sidewalk despite the fact that a “path” is planned for the north side of Swift Gulch road. Also,
there is no outlet on the southeast side for pedestrians, making the entry path less valuable. Bollard lighting
for the pedestrian path connection would be a nice addition.
Development Transitions: “The carefully planned transition between auto and pedestrian is an important
element that encourages the use of convenient parking and inviting pedestrian paths.”
“The architecture at the Village should create visually pleasing, enjoyable Buildings and structures that create
an architecturally vibrant Village. Buildings shall include quality design details and utilize elements of design
that will add context and interest to achieve the Design Philosophy. The standard for architectural design
shall be Traer Creek Plaza.”
“Each Building must be a unique expression that complements the Village by contributing to the fabric as one
among many, not to stand alone. The designer is to establish a unique stylistic expression, while using
complementary forms of material and color.”
Staff Response: This service station will stand out and not integrate with the surrounding uses and features
if approved as proposed. The stylistic expression present is conducive to an environment that the VAA is
trying to avoid based on the above guidelines. Design work to limit the impacts to neighboring properties is
important now.
Careful review of how this building relates to existing development in the area is warranted. For example,
the Ambulance Building is the closest building to the site. It is carefully articulated with mountain-forward
design and includes interesting and appropriate detailing, materials, roof forms, .etc.
Avon Ambulance facility on Swift Gulch Road
Screening: “All roof mounted machinery, vents, fans, etc. will be screened and hidden from sight. All loading
and refuse areas, mechanical or utility equipment will be screened.”
Staff Response: The roof mounted mechanical equipment appears to be properly screened on the plans.
RECOMMENDED COMMENTS: Below is a list of design suggestions taken from the above analysis. Staff
suggests PZC discuss these points, and any additional suggestions or considerations that could be helpful
for the VAA DRB as it reviews this project:
1. Modify the design to achieve more natural muted tones, building articulation, interactive windows,
passive solar design, enhanced treatment of the entrance, and innovative design to achieve the
Design Philosophy;
2. Tie the canopy design into the building design;
3. Provide a lighting cut sheet and confirm there are full cutoff lights throughout the project, with no
glare or light trespass;
4. Light fixture temperature should be lower K rating, with lighting intensity only high enough to safely
and adequately light the site;
5. Diminish the “sea of asphalt” by allowing only 22 parking spaces for the 4425 square foot building;
6. Per AMC Sec. 15.28, 6 electric vehicle capable, 4 electric vehicle ready, and 2 electric vehicle
installed spaces must be present on this site as proposed;
7. Include a sidewalk on Swift Gulch Road;
8. Final Landscape Plans should ensure compliance with landscape coverage, impermeable area,
slope, and a minimum planting hole diameter of two (2) times as large as the root ball diameter for
trees, with at least 5% organic matter;
9. Include an irrigation plan;
10. Include a striped pedestrian crossing area, or material treatment, between the pedestrian path and
the store front;
11. Include additional bicycle parking near the primary pedestrian entrance; and
12. Include a dumpster and recycling cut sheet and ensure it is complaint with the PUD and bear proof.
Attachments:
a) Architectural drawings
Link:
a) Village (at Avon) Design Guidelines
b) Village (at Avon) DRB Guidelines
DRAINAGEEASEMENT, ASPER ITEM 29,SCHEDULE B-2UTILITYEASEMENT, ASPER ITEM 29,SCHEDULE B-210' UTILITY, DRAINAGE,PEDESTRIAN, AND SNOWSTORAGE EASEMENT, AS PERITEM 32, SCHEDULE B-2RIGHTS OF ACCESS, AS PERITEM 29, SCHEDULE B-2 &AS RECORDED AS REC. No.852794I N T E R S T A T E - 7 0S
3
3
°
2
9
'
4
9
"
W
2
7
6
.
6
9
'L=338.57',R=1226.54'D=15°48'57"PARCEL No. 2103-083-01-002RAER CREEKHOLDINGS NO. 2 LLCO F F - R A M PSECTION LINE SSSSSSSC/OWVWVWVWVWVWVWVWVWVWVWVSWWATERLATERALGATEEEEWVIRRIRRIRRIRRIRRIRRIRRWVIRREEDDDDSTACKEDROCK WALLNATURAL GASPUMP HOUSE15'X17'IRRDVARIOUS 12"RCP BEINGINSTALLEDWWATERLATERALSSMHRIM=7694.11FL=7686.06SSMHRIM=7691.56FL=7683.76SSMHRIM=7689.49FL=7681.39SSMHRIM=7677.04FL=7670.84SSMHRIM=7672.22FL=7663.57SSMHRIM=7674.59FL=7661.89SSMHRIM=7652.50FL=7645.05COMBO BOXRIM=7651.01GRATE=7650.26FL=7646.01COMBO BOXRIM=7658.92GRATE=7659.83FL=SEALEDCOMBO BOXRIM=7671.39GRATE=7670.51FL=7665.49SDMHRIM=7672.36FL=SEALEDINLET BOXRIM=7669.24FL=SEALEDINLET BOXRIM=7689.31FL=7685.46SSMHRIM=7672.88FL=7665.06WVWVIRRN 44°08'22" E39.09'FOUND REBAR & CAP(LS-37924)BENCHMARK = 7687.38L=184.88',R=630.00'D=16°48'51"N 54°48'36" E10.29'N 44°02'18" W 364.44'N 36°48'16" W 153.94'L=62.83',R=40.00'D=89°59'50"S 35°11'24" E 518.53'N 54°48'36" E 306
.58
'FOUND REBAR& CAP(LS-37924)FOUND REBAR & CAP(LS-23048 ALPINE)S W I F T G U L C H R O A DCOMBO BOXRIM=7671.39GRATE=7670.51FL=7665.49W I L L I A M J P O S T B L V D.S 19°28'47" E 794.10' (REC.)BASIS OF BEARING 794.21' (MEAS.)5-27-20SCALE:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:DATE:DATE
CHECKED BY:REVISIONS
SHEETDWG:OF 1 SHEETS352 East RiversideDrive, Suite A-2 St.George, Utah 84790Ph (435) 673-8586Fx (435) 673-8397www.racivil.com05/27/2011746-19.115B.E.A.B.E.A.1"=50'Survey-ALTAMAVERIK INC.
FOR
ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY
1Brandon E. Anderson Certificate No. 38484Date:NARRATIVE:This survey was conducted at the request of the client to provide an ALTA/ACSMLand Title Survey. The Basis of Bearing were the two found rebar & capscrossing the property as noted.SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE:LEGAL DESCRIPTION:Block 1, AVON LANDING, A REPLAT OF TRACT H, THE VILLAGE (AT AVON) FILING3, according to the final plat recorded September 3, 2015 as Reception No.201516730.CO
L
ORADO LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL LAND SUR
VEYOR38484BRANDON E.ANDERSONCE
R
T
I
FICATE No.050 100SCALE: 1"=50'NI hereby certify to Traer Creek Holdings No. 2 LLC, a Colorado limited liabilitycompany, Maverik, Inc a Utah Corporation & Stewart Title Guaranty Company:This is to certify that this map or plat and the survey on which it is based weremade in accordance with the 2016 Minimum Standard Detail Requirements forALTA/NSPS Land Title Surveys, jointly established and adopted by ALTA andNSPS,including items 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6a, 6b, 7a, 7b1, 7b2, 8, 9, 11, 13, 14, 16, &17 of Table A. The field work was completed on May 26, 2020.EASEMENTS AND SERVITUDES PERSCHEDULE B - SECTION 2:Item 11: Easements and rights of way as granted to Colorado Ute ElectricAssociation, Inc., by the following Documents: recorded September 14, 1973 inBook 231 at Page 090 as Reception No. 126957; September 14, 1973 in Book231 at Page 092 as Reception No. 126959; September 26, 1974 in Book 236 atPage 657 as Reception No. 132638+; May 28, 1964 in Book 182 at Page 413 asReception No. 99372; June 3, 1964 in Book 182 at Page 445 as Reception No.99392; August 6, 1965 in Book 190 at Page 391 as Reception No. 101887.Note: A Portion of easement was Quit Claim to Holy Cross Electric Association,Inc., by document recorded July 6, 1988 in Book 486 at Page 709 as ReceptionNo. 382912 and a Portion of Easement was Quit Claim to Nottingham RanchCompany, a Partnership, by document recorded August 11, 1988 in Book 488 atPage 898 as Reception No. 385099. - Does not AffectItem 12: Easements and Rights of way as granted to Holy Cross ElectricAssociation, Inc., by the following Documents: recorded August 14, 1973 in Book230 at Page 576 as Reception No. 126440; September 12, 1978 in Book 275 atPage 069 as Reception No. 171477; October 17, 1978 in Book 276 at Page 603as Reception No. 173013; May 16, 1979 in Book 285 at Page 581 as ReceptionNo. 181985; May 1, 1984 in Book 384 at Page 178 as Reception No. 280483;July 19, 1977 in Book 257 at Page 586 as Reception No. 153916. Does notAffectItem 13: Permanent Easement for a Perpetual Easement to The State Departmentof Highways, Division of Highways, State of Colorado recorded May 3, 1972 inBook 223 at Page 983 as Reception No. 119729. - Does not AffectItem 14: Lack of direct access to Interstate No. 70, which abuts subjectproperty. - PlottedItem 19: Easements with Covenants and Restrictions Affecting Land ECRrecorded May 30, 2002 as Reception No. 797038. - BlanketItem 27: Nottingham Dam Easement Agreement recorded August 25, 2004 asReception No. 888905. - Does not AffectItem 29: All matters as shown on the plat of The Village (at Avon) Filing 3recorded June 29, 2004 as Reception No. 882176. - PlottedItem 30: Easements with Covenants and Restrictions Affecting Land "ECR"recorded June 29, 2004 as Reception No. 882177. - BlanketItem 32: All matters shown on the Final Plat Avon Landing, a Replat of Tract H,The Village (at Avon), Filing No. 3 recorded September 3, 2015 as Reception No.201516730. - PlottedTABLE A STATEMENT OF INFORMATION:Item 2: Project Address - 00 Unknown, Avon, CO 81620.Item 3: Flood Zone Classification - Flood Zone Classification - The surveyedparcel is located within Zone "X". "X" which is defined as "Areas determined to beoutside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain", and such flood condition is shownon the Federal Flood Insurance Rate Maps, Community No. 08037C0463D,Dated December 4, 2007.Item 4: The total gross area of the site is 6.25 acres.Item 5: Vertical relief with the source of information (ground survey), contourinterval = 1 foot, datum, Benchmark is a Rebar & CAP (LS 37294)BENCHMARK=7687.38 at the southerly corner of the property.Item 6a: Zoning Classification and requirements - No letter providedItem 6b: Depiction of Zoning Requirements - No letter providedItem 7(a): Exterior dimensions of all buildings at ground level. - DescribedItem 7(b)(1): Square footage of exterior footprint of all buildings at groundlevel. 255 sq. ft..Item 7(b)(2): Square footage of other areas as specified by the client. noneItem 8: Substantial features observed - All depicted on plat.Item 9: Number of Types of Parking Spaces - noneItem 11: Location of utilities existing on or serving the surveyed property asdetermined by: Observation & blue stakes.Item 16: Evidence of recent earth moving work, building construction, orbuilding additions observed in the process of conducting the fieldwork. - 12"RCP being installed as noted.Item 17: Proposed changes in street right of way lines, if such information ismade available to the surveyor by the controlling jurisdiction. Evidence ofrecent street or sidewalk construction or repairs observed in the process ofconducting the fieldwork. - None observed.COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE:Prepared pursuant to Stewart Title guaranty Company, Commitment Date May 7,2020, File Number: 696930.SITEalta/nsps land title surveyLOCATED IN THE S.E. 1/4 OF SECTION 7 & S.W. 1/4 OF SECTION 8T.5 S., R.81 W., 6TH P.M.AVON | EAGLE COUNTY | COLORADO FILING CERTIFICATE:DEPOSITED THIS _______ DAY OF ______2020,AT_________ IN BOOK _______ PAGE __________OF THE COUNTY SURVEYOR'S LAND SURVEYPLATS/RIGHT-OF-WAY SURVEYS, RECEPTIONNo. _______________________ .BY: _______________________________ DEPUTYAVON, COLORADOVICINITY MAPSCALE: NONEINTERSTATE 70STONE CREEKEXISTING CONCRETEEXISTING ASPHALTFOUND 3" CDOT RIGHT-OF-WAYMARKEREXISTING SEWER MANHOLEEXISTING WATER VALVEEXISTING INLET BOXNOTHING SET OR FOUNDWVSLEGEND:EXISTING SEWER LINEEXISTING GAS LINE EXISTING FENCE LINEXEXISTING FIRE HYDRANTDEXISTING STORM DRAIN MANHOLEWIRREC/OFOUND PK NAIL UNLESS NOTEDEXISTING BUILDINGEXISTING SEWER CLEANOUTEXISTING LIGHT POLEEXISTING WATER MANHOLEEXISTING ELECTRICAL BOXEXISTING IRRIGATION VALVEDEXISTING COMBO INLET BOXAttachment A
MAVERICK
STORE SWIFT
GULCH
RD
.
WILLI
A
M J
P
O
ST
BL
V
D
EXISTI
N
G
SI
D
E
W
AL
K
PARK
ING
PARK
ING
PARK
ING
YG (3)PV (6)
PG (5)
SNOW STORAGE
GRA
SS S
E
E
D
GRAS
S
S
EE
D
WETLAND SEED MIX
EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT
GRASS SEED
EXISTING AUSTRIAN PINE
TREES TO REMAIN, TYP OF (17)
PROPOSED ADA PATH
REF CIVIL
RIVER ROCK
COBBLE MULCH
(5.5' WIDTH)PERENNIALS
PERENNIALS
ENTRY SIGN
PERENNIALS
PERENNIALS
PERENNIALS
TRASH
ENCLOSURE
PERENNIALS
PERENNIALS
PERENNIALS
SNOW STORAGE
2292 SF
SNO
W
S
T
O
R
A
G
E
1023 SF
RETAINING WALL
REF CIVIL
DETENTION BASIN
REF CIVIL
EXISTING AUSTRIAN
PINE TREES
TO REMAIN
EXISTING AUSTRIAN
PINE TREES TO BE REMOVED,
TYP OF (5)
EXISTING LANDSCAPE
AREA TO REMAIN
UNDISTURBED
CONC APRON
REF CIVIL
CONC APRON
REF CIVIL
PF (3)
PS (2)
PF (3)
HS (7)
YG (6)
PG (5)
CN (3)
PP (3)
RM (7)
CS (3)RA (3)RB (3)
PG (3)
RA (3)
CS (3)
AC (3)
RB (3)
QG (3)
RA (8)
PROPERTY LINE
RIVER ROCK
COBBLE MULCH
(5.5' WIDTH)
PV (8)
CC (3)
BN (3)
RW (3)
RA (3)
PG (3)
JC (6)
RM (3)
RA (3)
AL (7)
PG (5)
CA (7)
HS (7)
PT (3)
RW (3)
AL (7)
CN (3)
PG (3)CN (3)
RA (3)RM (3)
PA (3)
SNO
W
ST
O
R
A
G
E SNOW ST
O
RA
GE
4452 SFAG (1)
PE (3)
AL (7)
PG (3)
PE (3)
AL (3)
PG (3)
PG (3)
AL (3)
CN (5)
RW (3)
PG (3)
AG (1)
PG (3)
JC (3)
AL (3)
AL (3)PM (1)
PM (1)
PM (1)
PG (5)
QG (5)
AU (3)
JC (3)
CA (12)
PV (17)
AU (3)
AG (1)
AG (1)
JC (6)
PG (5)
CN (3)
CC (3)CA (14)
PE (3)
PA (3)
PE (3)
QG (3)
CN (3)
QG (3)
RW (3)
CO (1)
CO (1)
CO (1)
CO (1)
PV (3)
PG (5)
HS (3)
PG (5)
CO (1)
AG (1)
AL (3)
QG (3)
PG (5)
RW (3)
PM (3)
PE (3)
QG (3)
CA (13)
CA (10)
AG (1)
HS (3)
PV (7)
PG (5)
BT (3)
BT (3)
CS (3)
RB (3)
PP (1)
CS (3)
PF (5)
BT (3)
AL (3)
YG (3)
AU (5)
AL (3)
BT (5)
PS (3)
PS (1)
PG (5)
AL (5)
PV (7)
PF (3)
PG (3)
AU (4)
PG (3)
CA (7)
PV (7)
CA (5)
HS (5)
PLANT BED
(MULCH)
PLANT BED
(MULCH)
GRASS SEED
GRASS SEED
GRASS SEED
Symbol Key Botanical Description QTY Size Spacing Notes
Symbol Key Botanical Common Name QTY Size Spacing Comments
RW
Yucca glauca Saopweed
Yucca 12 as
shown
CC
Crataegus
crus-gali inermis
'Crusader'
Crusader
Cockspur
Hawthorn
6 3"
Cal.
as
shown
Deciduous Trees
AG Acer ginala
'Flame'
Amur
Maple 6 3"
Cal
as
shown
PT Populus
tremuloides
Quaking
Aspen 3 as
shown
Coniferous Trees
PA Pinus aristata Bristlecone
Pine 6 10'
Ht.
as
shown
Shrubs
RB
Symbol Key Botanical Common Name QTY Size Spacing Comments
Grasses
CA 68 5 gal.as
shown
Calamagrostisacutiflora 'KarlForester'
Karl Forester
Feather Reed
Grass
Helictotrichon
sempervirensHS 25 5 gal.as
shown
Blue Avena
Grass
PG
Rhus aromatica Fragrant
Sumac 26 as
shown
PE Pinus edulis Pinyon
Pine 12 8'
Ht.
as
shown
PP Picea pungens
glauca Blue Spruce 4 14'
Ht.
as
shown
Groundcover
Symbol Common Name
Total Area Material / Product Depth / Rate Supplier
Grass Seed
(Festuca ovina)30,470 SF Kovar Sheep
Fescue
8 lbs /
acre Pawnee Buttes Seed
Bark Mulch 3,456 SF Finely Shredded
Cedar Mulch 3" Depth
PLANT SCHEDULE
YG
Rhus typhina
'Bailtiger'
Tiger Eyes
Sumac 9 as
shown
JC Juniperus communis
var. depressa
Common
Juniper 15 5
gal.
as
shown
Berberis thunbergii
'Orange Rocket'
Orange Rocket
Barberry 16 as
shownBT
Amelanchier
canadensis Serviceberry 3 as
shown
PS
QG
Rosa Woodsii Woods Rose 18 as
shown
PF
Perovskia
atriplicifolia
'Filigran'
Filigran
Russian Sage
75 5 gal.
RA
16
Quercus
gambelii Gambel Oak 20 as
shown
(Multi - Stem)
Perennials
Mixed Species
(See Perennial List)1,017 SF
Symbol Common Name
Total Area Container Size
1 GAL
Spacing
18"
OC
Supplier
Multi-Stem
B&B Clump
CS Cornus sericea
'Baileyi'
Redtwig
Dogwood 15 as
shown
PM Pinus mugo
var. rostrata Mugo Pine 6 6'
Ht.
as
shown
as
shown
as
shown
River Rock
Cobble Mulch
(Multi-colore)
1,153 SF
4" to 6" Ø
Round Stones
(Un-crushed)
4"-6"
QTY
447
B&B
B&B
Ribes aureum Gooseberry 11 as
shown
Picea pungens
'Montgomery'
Montgomery
Spruce 6 3' Ht.as
shown
AC
RM
CO Celtis
occidentalis Hackberry 5 3"
Cal.
as
shown B&B
Artemesia
ludoviciana
Prairie
Sagebrush 43 as
shownAL
Arcostaphylos
coloradoensis
Panchito
Manzanita 22 as
shownAU
CN Chysothamnus
nauseosus Rabbitbrush 25 as
shown
Panicum virgatum
'Cloud Nine'PV 55 5 gal.as
shown
Tall
Switch Grass
Wetland
Seed Mix 1,646 SF Mountain
Wetland Mix
10 lbs /
acre Pawnee Buttes Seed
BN Betula
occidentalis Red Birch 3 10'
Ht.
as
shown Multi-Stem
B&B Clump
5
gal.
5
gal.
5
gal.
5
gal.
5
gal.
6'
Ht.
5
gal.
5
gal.
5
gal.
5
gal.
5
gal.
5
gal.
5
gal.
B&B
PERENNIAL PLANT LIST:
BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME
Achillea 'Summer Wine'SUMMER WINE YARROW
Aquilegia 'Bluebird'BLUE BIRD COLUMBINE
Calamintha nepeta 'Blue Cloud'CALAMINT
Delospema 'Fire Spinner'ICE PLANT
Delospema 'Mesa Verde'ICE PLANT
Echinacea 'Flame Thrower'HYBRID CONEFLOWER
Gallardia x grandiflora 'Kobold' GOBLIN GOBLIN BLANKET FLOWER
Geranium 'Johnson's Blue'JOHNSON'S BLUE GERANIUM
Heliopsis helianthoides 'Tuscan Sun'TUSCAN SUNFLOWER
Hemerocallis 'Autumn Red'RED DAYLILY
Heuchera pulchella SANDIA MTN.CORAL BELLS
Leucanthemum x superbum SHASTA DAISY
Liatris spicata 'Kobold'GAYFEATHER
Monarda didyma 'Pardon My Cerise'RED BEE BALM
Mahonia repens CREEPING OREGON GRAPE
Penstemon strictus ROCKY MOUNTAIN PENSTEMON
Phlox subulata 'Fort Hill'FORT HILL MOSS PHLOX
Salvia nemorosa 'Blue Marvel'BLUE MARVEL SALVIA
Thymus praecox CREEPING THYME
L2.1
1 LANDSCAPE PLAN
1" = 20'
PERENNIAL PLANTING NOTES:
1. PERENNIALS SHALL BE PLACED ACCORDING TO THEIR MATURE HEIGHT WITH
THE SHORTEST PLANTS LOCATED CLOSEST TO THE DRIVEWAY EDGE AND
TALLEST PLANTS LOCATED FURTHEST FROM THE DRIVEWAY EDGE.
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR
APPROVAL OF THE PERENNIAL LAYOUT AND PLACEMENT PRIOR TO FINAL
PLANTING.
LANDSCAPE AREA CALCULATIONS
TOTAL LOT AREA = 85,492 SF
LANDSCAPE AREA PROVIDED = 22,454 SF
PERCENTAGE OF LANDSCAPE AREA WITHIN LOT BOUNDARY = 26.3%
Pinyon Pine
Hackberry
Blue Spruce
Quaking Aspen
Amur Maple
Saopweed Yucca Rabbitbrush
Orange Rocket Barberry
Redtwig DogwoodPerennials
Fragrant Sumac
Woods Rose
Karl Forester
Blue Avena River Rock Cobble
Bark Mulch
Attachment A
Sp
94' - 0"50' - 11"118
35° STOR.
COOLER
119
-10°
FREEZER
112
DELI PREP
113
KITCHEN
SERVICE
111
COFFEE
PREP
105
MEN'S
104
EXIT
HALLWAY
106
WOMEN'S
115
35°
BEVERAGE
COOLER
114
30° BEER
COOLER
HOUSEKEEPING
PAD
110
VENDOR
RECEIVING
102
OFFICE
Prototype Version:
185 S. State Street
Salt Lake City, Utah 84111
Building Square Footage:
Construction Type/Occupancy Classification:
PROPOSED MAVERIK C-STORE 40_R_RR_2002
A-1 FLOOR PLAN
4,425 SF
V-B/M
SCALE:1/4" = 1'-0"1 FLOOR PLAN
Attachment A
Sp
2
A-2
3
A-2
1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"SKYLIGHT
HVAC
ROOFTOP
UNIT
HVAC
ROOFTOP
UNIT
HVAC
ROOFTOP
UNIT
CONDENSING
UNIT
CONDENSING
UNIT
CONDENSING
UNIT
CONDENSING
UNIT
CONDENSING
UNITCONDENSING
UNIT
CONDENSING
UNIT
CONDENSING
UNIT
PVC ROOFING, WHITE, OVER R-30 RIGID INSULATION
ENTRY AWNING
ENTRY AWNINGENTRY AWNING
115' - 5 1/2"
119' - 0"
STANDING SEAM METAL
ROOF, MIDNIGHT BRONZE
Prototype Version:
185 S. State Street
Salt Lake City, Utah 84111
Building Square Footage:
Construction Type/Occupancy Classification:
PROPOSED MAVERIK C-STORE 40_R_RR_2002
A-2 ROOF PLAN & SECTIONS
4,425 SF
V-B/M
SCALE:3/16" = 1'-0"1 ROOF PLAN
SCALE:1/8" = 1'-0"2 BUILDING SECTION
SCALE:1/8" = 1'-0"3 BUILDING SECTION
Attachment A
Prototype Version:
185 S. State Street
Salt Lake City, Utah 84111
Building Square Footage:
Construction Type/Occupancy Classification:
PROPOSED MAVERIK C-STORE 40_R_RR_2002
A-3 PERSPECTIVE VIEW
4,425 SF SF
V-B/M
Attachment A
FINISH FLOOR
100' -0"
FINISH FLOOR
100' -0"
T.O. PARAPET 2
120' -0"
T.O. PARAPET 2
120' -0"
T.O. ROOF
129' -1"
T.O. ROOF
129' -1"
WAINSCOT
104' -0"
WAINSCOT
104' -0"
TYP.
04.06
TYP.
04.05
TYP.
05.69
TYP.
06.04
TYP.
06.06
TYP.
06.05
TYP.
05.10
TYP.
08.02
TYP.
08.02
T.O. WINDOW
111' -0"
T.O. WINDOW
111' -0"
TYP.
10.01
T.O. PARAPET
119' -0"T.O. PARAPET
119' -0"
TYP.
08.05
TYP.
05.01
TYP.
05.03
TYP.
05.03
TYP.
06.05
TYP.
06.04
TYP.
05.21
TYP.
06.30
TYP.
05.21
FINISH FLOOR
100' -0"
FINISH FLOOR
100' -0"
T.O. PARAPET 2
120' -0"
T.O. PARAPET 2
120' -0"
BEAM BEARING
120' -3"
T.O. ROOF
129' -1"
T.O. ROOF
129' -1"
WAINSCOT
104' -0"
WAINSCOT
104' -0"
TYP.
05.01
TYP.
05.03
TYP.
05.69
TYP.
04.06
TYP.
04.05
TYP.
06.04
TYP.
06.05
T.O. PARAPET
119' -0"
T.O. PARAPET
119' -0"
TYP.
05.05
TYP.
05.03
TYP.
06.06
TYP.
06.04
TYP.
05.21
TYP.
06.05
TYP.
06.06
TYP.
05.21
Prototype Version:
185 S. State Street
Salt Lake City, Utah 84111
Building Square Footage:
Construction Type/Occupancy Classification:
PROPOSED MAVERIK C-STORE 40_R_RR_2002
A-4 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
4,425 SF
V-B/M
SCALE:1/4" = 1'-0"1 FRONT ELEVATION
KEYED NOTES
04.05 STONE VENEER, SKYLINE, COUNTRY LEDGESTONE
04.06 STONE VENEER CAP, SKYLINE, COUNTRY LEDGESTONE
05.01 PRE-FINISHED GUTTER, BRITE RED
05.03 PAINTED STEEL, BLACK FOX
05.05 MBCI PRE-FINISHED ROOF, COLOR C-1, 1-3/4" STANDING SEAM
05.10 PRE-FINISHED METAL EAVE FLASHING BY ROOF MANUFACTURER, MIDNIGHT
BRONZE
05.21 PRE-FINISHED METAL COPING, COLOR C-1
05.69 STEEL AWNING, COLOR P-9
06.04 EIFS, COLOR TO MATCH SHERWIN WILLIAM SW7019, GAUNTLET GRAY
06.05 EIFS, COLOR TO MATCH SHERWIN WILLIAM SW7043, WORLDLY GRAY
06.06 EIFS TRIM, COLOR TO MATCH SHERWIN WILLIAM SW7043, WORLDLY GRAY
06.30 EIFS REVEAL
08.02 ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM, DARK BRONZE
08.05 WINDOW, SEE SCHEDULE
10.01 ROOF ACCESS LADDER W/ SECURITY GATE, SEE DETAIL 1/A5.11. POWDER
COATED COLOR TO MATCH SIDING BB-1
SCALE:1/4" = 1'-0"2 LEFT ELEVATION
Attachment A
FINISH FLOOR
100' -0"
FINISH FLOOR
100' -0"
T.O. PARAPET 2
120' -0"
T.O. PARAPET 2
120' -0"
T.O. ROOF
129' -1"
T.O. ROOF
129' -1"
WAINSCOT
104' -0"
WAINSCOT
104' -0"
TYP.
06.05
TYP.
06.04
TYP.
04.06
TYP.
04.05
TYP.
05.69
T.O. PARAPET
119' -0"
T.O. PARAPET
119' -0"
TYP.
10.01
TYP.
06.30
TYP.
06.06
TYP.
05.21
TYP.
06.04
TYP.
32.01
FINISH FLOOR
100' -0"
T.O. PARAPET 2
120' -0"
T.O. PARAPET 2
120' -0"
BEAM BEARING
120' -3"
T.O. ROOF
129' -1"
WAINSCOT
104' -0"
WAINSCOT
104' -0"
TYP.
05.01
TYP.
05.69
TYP.
05.03
TYP.
06.06
TYP.
06.05
TYP.
06.04
TYP.
04.06
TYP.
04.05
TYP.
04.06
FINISHED FLOOR
100' -0"
FINISHED FLOOR
100' -0"
TYP.
10.01
TYP.
05.69
TYP.
06.06
TYP.
05.21
T.O. PARAPET
119' -0"
T.O. PARAPET
119' -0"
TYP.
05.05
TYP.
06.30
TYP.
05.03
TYP.
04.05
TYP.
32.01
TYP.
06.05
Prototype Version:
185 S. State Street
Salt Lake City, Utah 84111
Building Square Footage:
Construction Type/Occupancy Classification:
PROPOSED MAVERIK C-STORE 40_R_RR_2002
A-5 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
4,425 SF
V-B/M
SCALE:1/4" = 1'-0"1 REAR ELEVATION
KEYED NOTES
04.05 STONE VENEER, SKYLINE, COUNTRY LEDGESTONE
04.06 STONE VENEER CAP, SKYLINE, COUNTRY LEDGESTONE
05.01 PRE-FINISHED GUTTER, BRITE RED
05.03 PAINTED STEEL, BLACK FOX
05.05 MBCI PRE-FINISHED ROOF, COLOR C-1, 1-3/4" STANDING SEAM
05.21 PRE-FINISHED METAL COPING, COLOR C-1
05.69 STEEL AWNING, COLOR P-9
06.04 EIFS, COLOR TO MATCH SHERWIN WILLIAM SW7019, GAUNTLET GRAY
06.05 EIFS, COLOR TO MATCH SHERWIN WILLIAM SW7043, WORLDLY GRAY
06.06 EIFS TRIM, COLOR TO MATCH SHERWIN WILLIAM SW7043, WORLDLY GRAY
06.30 EIFS REVEAL
10.01 ROOF ACCESS LADDER W/ SECURITY GATE, SEE DETAIL 1/A5.11. POWDER
COATED COLOR TO MATCH SIDING BB-1
32.01 CHAIN LINK FENCE WITH PRIVACY SLATS. COLOR TO MATCH BUILDING FIELD
COLOR
SCALE:1/4" = 1'-0"2 RIGHT ELEVATION
Attachment A
2' - 6"OPEN TO BELOW(PUMP ACCESS)2' -
6
"
14' - 0"12' - 0"
TYP.
26.10
TYP.
10.50
TYP.
26.07
TYP.
05.68
TYP.
09.17TYP.
11.06
TYP.
32.08
TYP.
32.03
TYP.
03.10
TYP.
32.06
TYP.
32.05
TYP.
10.49
12' - 0"14' - 0"
TYP.
10.50
TYP.
26.10
TYP.
26.07
TYP.
05.68
TYP.
09.17
TYP.
11.06
TYP.
32.08
TYP.
32.03
TYP.
03.10
TYP.
32.05
TYP.
32.06
TYP.
10.492' - 9"6"3' - 3"11' - 0"28' - 0"28' - 0"28' - 0"28' - 0"28' - 0"11' - 0"
TYP. SLOPE
SEE CIVIL
TYP. SLOPE
SEE CIVIL
11' - 0"28' - 0"28' - 0"28' - 0"28' - 0"28' - 0"11' - 0"
Prototype Version:
185 S. State Street
Salt Lake City, Utah 84111
Building Square Footage:
Construction Type/Occupancy Classification:
PROPOSED MAVERIK C-STORE 40_R_RR_2002
A-6 CANOPY ELEVATIONS
4,425 SF
V-B/M
03.10 6" MIN. RAISED CONCRETE ISLAND W/ TOOLED EDGES AND CORNERS. VERIFY
SIZE W/ DISPENSER SUPPLIER +/-5'-0" X 3'-0" (NO METAL FORM). ACCESSIBLE
ISLAND TO BE 6"; SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR LOCATION
05.68 ALUMINUM COMPOSITE METAL PANEL, WHITE
09.17 STEEL COLUMN, COLOR TO MATCH P-9
10.49 4A:40 BC FIRE EXTINGUISHER W/ CASE, LOCATE WITHIN 75' OF ALL PUMPS,
DISPENSERS, OR STORAGE TANK. LOCATION TO BE FINALIZED BY FIRE
MARSHAL
10.50 SIGNAGE TO BE COORDINATED BY FUEL CANOPY CONTRACTOR WITH OWNER
11.06 DISPENSING STATION (BY OTHERS)
26.07 ALL LIGHT FIXTURES (NOT SHOWN) TO BE FLUSH MOUNTED WITHIN THE DECK
PANEL SOFFIT (SOFFIT COLOR P-7). SEE ELECTRICAL AND FUEL DISPENSING
DRAWINGS
26.10 SOLAR PANELS, MOUNTED TO FUEL CANOPY STRUCTURE
32.03 4" DIAMETER "U" BOLLARD, SET AND FILLED W/ CONCRETE, SEE CIVIL
DRAWINGS PAINTED P-4
32.05 SIGNAGE, BY OWNER, TO COMPLY WITH IFC 2305.6 AND POSTED ON EACH
SIDE OF COLUMN
32.06 S.S.I. (WINDOW WASH/PAPER TOWEL) PROVIDED BY OWNER INSTALLED BY
CONTRACTOR, MOUNTED TO COLUMN PER ADA REQUIREMENTS (4'-0" MAX
A.F.F. TO PAPER TOWEL FOLD)
32.08 TRASH CONTAINER, PROVIDED BY OWNER
SCALE:1/2" = 1'-0"2 CANOPY COLUMN PLAN
SCALE:1/4" = 1'-0"4 FUEL DISPENSING CANOPY END - ELEVATION
SCALE:1/4" = 1'-0"5 FUEL DISPENSING END - ELEVATION
SCALE:1/4" = 1'-0"1 FUEL DISPENSING CANOPY STREET - ELEVATION
SCALE:1/4" = 1'-0"3 FUEL DISPENSING CANOPY - BUILDING SIDE ELEVATION
KEYED NOTES
Attachment A
Stone -Skyline, Country Ledgestone
C-2 MBCI Brite RedC-1 MBCI Midnight Bronze Anodized -Dark Bronze Paint -Black Fox
EIFS
Color: SW7019, Gauntlet Gray
EIFS
Color: SW7043, Worldly Gray
Prototype Version:
185 S. State Street
Salt Lake City, Utah 84111
Building Square Footage:
Construction Type/Occupancy Classification:
PROPOSED MAVERIK C-STORE 40_R_RR_2002
A-7 EXTERIOR MATERIALS BOARD
4,425 SF
V-B/M
Attachment A
SSSWVWVWVWVWVEIRRIRRIRRIRRWVIRREIRRWVAN40_L_RR_20014,425 SFMARTIN/MARTIN
C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R S
77 METCALF RD., #301, AVON, COLORADO 81620
970.926.6007 MARTINMARTIN.COM
MAVERIK GAS STATION
POST BLVD. & I-70
AVON, COLORADO
PRELIMINARY PLANS
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION811C100SITE PLAN Attachment A
SSSWVWVWVWVWVEIRRIRRIRRIRRWVIRREIRRWVANFFE=7677.8540_L_RR_20014,425 SFMARTIN/MARTIN
C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R S
77 METCALF RD., #301, AVON, COLORADO 81620
970.926.6007 MARTINMARTIN.COM
MAVERIK GAS STATION
POST BLVD. & I-70
AVON, COLORADO
PRELIMINARY PLANS
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION811C200GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN Attachment A
SSSWVWVWVWVWVEIRRIRRIRRIRRWVIRREDIRRDWVAN40_L_RR_20014,425 SFMARTIN/MARTIN
C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R S
77 METCALF RD., #301, AVON, COLORADO 81620
970.926.6007 MARTINMARTIN.COM
MAVERIK GAS STATION
POST BLVD. & I-70
AVON, COLORADO
PRELIMINARY PLANS
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION811C300UTILITY PLAN #Attachment A
September 15, 2020 PZC Meeting
Comprehensive Plan
September 10, 2020
David McWilliams,
Town Planner
September 15, 2020 PZC Meeting
GOAL:Familiarize PZC with the purpose,origin and use of
the Comprehensive Plan.
Questions to Ask:
•What are our community assets/opportunities?
•What are our community needs/challenges?
•What is our community vision for the future?
•What goals,policies,objectives,and actions will help us
achieve that vision,and address our challenges and
opportunities?
September 15, 2020 PZC Meeting
PURPOSE:
“Municipalities and counties are authorized to prepare comprehensive plans as a long-range
guiding document for a community to achieve its vision and goals.The comprehensive plan
(or master plan)provides the policy framework for regulatory tools like zoning,subdivision
regulations,annexations,and other policies.A comprehensive plan promotes the
community's vision,goals,objectives,and policies,establishes a process for orderly growth
and development,addresses both current and long-term needs,and provides for a balance
between the natural and built environment.Elements addressed in a comprehensive plan
may include:recreation and tourism (required by state statutes),transportation,land use,
economic development,affordable housing,environment,parks and open space,natural
and cultural resources,hazards,capital improvements,water supply and conservation,
efficiency in government,sustainability,energy,and urban design.”-DOLA
September 15, 2020 PZC Meeting
Avon’s Vision
•Natural Environment
•Built Form
•Sense of Place
•Activity and entertainment Center
•Vibrant Economy
•Attainable Housing
•Diversity
Achieved through Goals,Policies,Implementation Matrix,District Planning Principles
September 15, 2020 PZC Meeting
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY FRAMEWORK
Opportunities
•Redevelop older buildings / reorganize parcel
boundaries and street pattern
•Transit to BC, connections to and along River
•Nottingham park as anchor; Cultural
amenities
Constraints
•Avon Road
•East TC is fragmented
•Railroad is a barrier
September 15, 2020 PZC Meeting
FUTURE LAND
USE MAP
•Establishes preferred
development patterns by
designating land use.
•Does not supersede the
Town’s zoning districts and
regulations
•Visual guide for the
community based on the
goals, objectives, and policies
presented within this
document.
September 15, 2020 PZC Meeting
COMMUNITY
FRAMEWORK
PLAN
Illustrate key community policies that will help
achieve the desired community character.
September 15, 2020 PZC Meeting
BUILT FORM DIAGRAM
•Illustrate the
desired
community
form
•Guide and
support the
land use
regulations
•Provide clear
expectations for
future
development
September 15, 2020 PZC Meeting
GOALS AND POLICIES
One of more goals and several specific policy objectives. Certain goals and policies
are more specific and timely than others; however, all goals and policies contribute to
the vision of the plan and its implementation. Finally, certain policies interrelate to
several topic areas.
A. Built Form
B. Land Use
C. Community Character
D. Economic Development
E. Housing
F. Multi-Model Transportation & Parking
G. Environment
H. Parks, Recreation, Trails & Open Space
I. Public Services, Facilities, Utilities & Government
J. Regional Coordination
September 15, 2020 PZC Meeting
Built Form
Goal A.1: Promote a compact community form.
Goal A.2: Maintain a distinct physical and visual separation between
Avon and its surrounding communities that preserves the natural
beauty of the surrounding mountains and the Eagle River valley.
Goal A.3: Ensure that annexations provide an overall benefit to the
community and are in conformance with this plan’s goals and policies.
September 15, 2020 PZC Meeting
Land Use
Goal B.1: Provide a balance of land uses that offer a range of housing options, diverse commercial
and employment opportunities, inviting guest accommodations, and high quality civic and
recreational facilities that work in concert to strengthen Avon’s identity as both a year-round
residential community and as a commercial, tourism and economic center.
Goal B.2: Ensure that Avon continues to develop as a community of safe, interactive, and cohesive
neighborhoods that contribute to the Town’s overall character and image.
Goal B.3: Use mixed-use development to create a more balanced, sustainable system
of land uses.
Goal B.4: Encourage commercial development that enhances Avon’s overall economic health,
contributes to the community’s image and character, and provides residents and visitors with
increased choices and services.
Goal B.5: Encourage revitalization of existing light industrial and manufacturing uses.
September 15, 2020 PZC Meeting
Goal C.1: Ensure that development is compatible with existing and
planned adjacent development and contributes to Avon’s community
image and character.
Goal C.2: Create community gateways and streetscapes that reflect
and strengthen Avon’s unique community character and image.
Goal C.3: Enhance existing cultural and heritage facilities, events, and
programs that strengthen Avon’s community character and image.
Community Character
September 15, 2020 PZC Meeting
Economic Development
Goal D.1: Ensure that there is a positive environment for small businesses.
Goal D.2: Promote high quality Town investments.
Goal D.3: Increase the number of visitors to Avon by enhancing the year-
round mountain resort community.
September 15, 2020 PZC Meeting
Housing
Goal E.1:Achieve a diverse range of housing densities,styles,and types,including
rental and for sale,to serve all segments of the population.
Goal E.2:Coordinate with neighboring communities to provide an attainable housing
program that incorporates both rental and ownership opportunities,affordable for local
working families.
September 15, 2020 PZC Meeting
Multi-modal Transportation and Parking
Goal F.1: Create an integrated multi-modal transportation system that
minimizes dependence on automobile travel within the Town by making
it easier and more inviting to use transit, walk, ride bicycles, and utilize
other non-motorized vehicles.
Goal F.2: Maintain and improve transit connections between Avon and
Beaver Creek Village.
Goal F.3: Encourage a “park once/shop many” environment.
September 15, 2020 PZC Meeting
Environment
Goal G.1: Protect Avon’s unique natural setting and its open spaces.
Goal G.2: Identify and mitigate potential environmental hazards to
promote public health, safety, and welfare.
Goal G.3: Discourage air, water, light, and noise pollution.
September 15, 2020 PZC Meeting
Parks,Recreation,Trails,and Open Space
Goal H.1:Provide an exceptional system of parks,trails,and
recreational programs to serve
the year-round needs of area residents and visitors.
Goal H.2:Coordinate and collaborate with surrounding
jurisdictions and agencies to develop
recreational opportunities.
September 15, 2020 PZC Meeting
Public Services, Facilities, Utilities, & Government
Goal I.1: Ensure cost effective provision and development of public
facilities and services.
Goal I.2: Encourage the broad participation of citizens in planning
efforts and decision-making.
Regional Coordination
Goal J.1: Collaborate with other agencies to implement this plan and to
ensure Avon’s needs and goals are being met.
September 10, 2020 PZC Meeting
Implementation Matrix
Tangible “next steps”for Town Policy.
September 15, 2020 PZC Meeting
District Planning
1.Town Core
2.River
3.Nottingham Park
4.US 6 Gateway
5.Village at Avon
6.Gulch Area
7.Railroad District
8.Open Space District
9.Valley Residential
10.I-70 Gateway
11.Northern Residential
September 15, 2020 PZC Meeting
Town Center
•Adhere to master plans (WTC,
ETC)
•Ped Circulation
•Public Plazas
•Mixed use
•Human Scale
•Parking Facilities
•Cohesion between TC and VAA
September 15, 2020 PZC Meeting
Riverfront
•Improve connections
•Limit River Access
•Transit
•Orient Buildings to Capitalize
on River
•Building height subordinate to
TC
•Parking and service away
from River
•Screen from US 6
•Minimize loss of trees while
adhering to design principles
September 15, 2020 PZC Meeting
Nottingham Park
•Implement TG planning
principles from TOP
•Maintain flex space
•Develop parking
•Passive spaces
•View Corridors
September 15, 2020 PZC Meeting
US 6 Gateway
•Sense of arrival
•Screen Ski parking
•Pedestrian Connections
•Minimize cut areas
•Share property access
•River Access
Railroad Corridor
•Ensure ROW is preserved
•Minimize railroad as a barrier
•Additional crossings
•Maintenance
September 15, 2020 PZC Meeting
Village At Avon
•Ped access
•Public Space
•Mixed use
•Building height
subordinate to TC
•Avoid single-use buildings
•Shared parking
•Screening
•View corridors
•Access from US 6
•Connections and
trailheads
September 15, 2020 PZC Meeting
Gulch Areas
•Buildings subordinate to TC
•Screening
•Sidewalks and pedestrian
connections
•Residential development that
supports primary industrial or
employment uses
•Landscaping
•Enhance WAP trailhead
•Reduce development intensity
along Buck Creek Road
September 15, 2020 PZC Meeting
Open Space
•Pursue acquisition of land
•Encourage USFS maintain
ownership.
•Long term maintenance
Gateway District
•Enhance I-70 ramps
•Maintain gateway elements
•Ped improvements
•Aesthetics of underpass
•Screen adjacent buildings from I-
September 15, 2020 PZC Meeting
Valley Residential
•High quality redevelopment
•Buildings subordinate to TC
•Pedestrian features
•Access to trails
•Reseed with native grasses /
additional landscaping
September 15, 2020 PZC Meeting
Northern Residential
•Enhance Open Space
•Alternative Ped Circulation
•Alternative access
•Limit alteration of natural
slopes and ridgelines
•Trailhead access
September 15, 2020 PZC Meeting
Town Owned Properties
•TG
•Wildridge Firehouse
•Swift Gulch Parcels
•Public Works Site (Lot 5)
•VAA Park Site
•VAA School Site
•Wildwood Properties
September 15, 2020 PZC Meeting
Community Housing Plan
Goals:
•Ownership: Focus on “missing middle” 140% or less of AMI
($430,000).
•50% ownership 50% rental for Town
•Rental: 80-120 AMI “step up” renters and seniors
Strategies:
•Short term rental, accessory dwelling units, and lock-off
incentives and regulations.
•Update mitigation/linkage policies
•Inclusionary housing policy
•Fee waiver/ reimbursement process
•A top priority is pursuing housing development on Town owned
land
•Public/private partnerships
•“Buy-down” (Mi Casa)
•Invest in maintenance of current inventory
September 15, 2020 PZC Meeting
Thank you,
David McWilliams
Links:
Avon Comprehensive Plan
Town Owned Properties
Community Housing Plan