L86W B4 WR FencePLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECORD OF DECISION
DATE OF DECISION: May 19, 2020
TYPE OF APPLICATION: Minor Development Plan & Alternative Equivalent Compliance
PROPERTY LOCATION: Lot 86W Block 4 Wildridge Subdivision
FILE NUMBER: MNR20010 & AEC20003
APPLICANT: Dana Macik
A
Avon
Cot ORADD
CASE AEC20003:
This Record of Decision is made in accordance with the Avon Development Code ("Development Code") §7.16.120(b);
DECISION: Approval of the application with the following findings:
FINDINGS:
1. The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.120, Alternative Equivalent Compliance;
2. The proposed alternative achieves the intent of the subject design or development standard to the same or
better degree than the subject standard;
3. The proposed alternative achieves the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan to the same or
better degree than the subject standard;
4. The proposed alternative results in benefits to the community that are equivalent to or better than compliance
with the subject standard;
5. The proposed alternative does not impose greater impacts on adjacent properties than would occur through
compliance with the specific requirements of the Code; and
6. The size, location, and fence type all align with the Code, making the addition of mesh screening less impactful.
CASE MNR20010:
This Record of Decision is made in accordance with the Avon Development Code ("Development Code") §7.16.080(c):
DECISION: Approval of the development plan with the following findings and condition:
FINDINGS:
1. The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.080(f), Development Plan, §7.16.090(f), Design
Review. The design meets the development and design standards established n the Avon Development Code;
2. The application is complete;
3. The application provides sufficient information to allow the PZC to determine that the application complies with
the relevant review criteria;
4. The application complies with the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan;
5. There are no additional demands for public services or infrastructure by the application; and
6. The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community.
CONDITION:
1. At no point shall the fence be more than four (4) feet in height as measured from the ground directly below it.
THESE FI I S FACT AND RECORD OF DECISION ARE HEREBY APPROVE:
tt
BY: DATE: l9 v
PZC Record of Decision: #MjR20010 & #AEC20003
Page 1 of 2
6.7-,-20
AL0
PZC Record of Decision: #M)R20010 & #AEC20003 Page 2 of 2