The URL can be used to link to this page

PZC Packet 030320_______________________________________________________________________________ MEETING AGENDAS AND PACKETS ARE FOUND AT: WWW.AVON.ORG AGENDAS ARE POSTED AT AVON TOWN HALL, AVON RECREATION CENTER, AVON ELEMENTARY AND AVON PUBLIC LIBRARY IF YOU HAVE ANY SPECIAL ACCOMMODATION NEEDS, PLEASE, IN ADVANCE OF THE MEETING, CALL TOWN PLANNER DAVID MCWILLIAMS AT 970-748-4023 OR EMAIL CMCWILLIAMS@AVON.ORG WITH ANY SPECIAL REQUESTS. 1 AVON PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA TUESDAY, MARCH 3, 2020 MEETING BEGINS AT 5:00 PM AVON TOWN HALL, 100 MIKAELA WAY, AVON, CO 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 3. DISCLOSURE OF ANY CONFLICTS OF INTEREST RELATED TO AGENDA ITEMS 4. BUSINESS ITEMS 4.1. MJR20001 &AEC20001, MAJOR DESIGN PLAN AND ALTERNATIVE EQUIVALENT COMPLIANCE FOR A PROPOSED SINGLE-FAMILY HOUSE ON LOT 3 WILDRIDGE POINT, 5085 WILDRIDGE ROAD EAST (JEFF MANLEY & TOWN PLANNER DAVID MCWILLIAMS) 4.2. SGN2002, SIGN APPLICATION FOR TWO (2) NEW PERMANENT LED SIGNS ON THE UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD BRIDGE ABOVE AVON ROAD (TOWN PLANNER DAVID MCWILLIAMS) 4.3. CONSENT AGENDA, 4.3.1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES FROM FEBRUARY 18, 2020 PZC MEETING 5. STAFF UPDATES 6. ADJOURN March 3, 2020 PZC Meeting – 5091 Wildridge Road East House 1 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: David McWilliams, AICP, Town Planner RE: MJR20002 & AEC20001 Major Development Plan & Alternative Equivalent Compliance Public Hearing Lot 3 Wildridge Point Subdivision / 5091 Wildridge Road East DATE: February 28, 2020 STAFF REPORT OVERVIEW: This staff report contains two applications for consideration by the PZC: Major Development Plan with Design Review for a new single-family house; and an Alternative Equivalent Compliance (AEC) application for roof pitch and Landscape Unit count. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Jeff Manley (the Applicant) proposes a new house on Lot 3 with 5,186 s.f. of livable space and a 775 s.f. garage. It has five (5) bedrooms, five (5) baths and embraces the existing grade for a softer approach to the site. The garage and front door are on the street-level and the living space and bedrooms are located below. That is, occupants will walk down a flight of stairs to access the main house. PUBLIC NOTICE: Notice of the public hearing was published in the February 21, 2020 edition of the Vail Daily in accordance with Sec. 7.16.020(d) of the Avon Municipal Code (AMC). Mailed notice is not required for this application type. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Lot 3 is .809 acres located on a prominent south-facing ridge at a curve of Wildridge Road East. It is zoned PUD and borders duplex and single-family houses, and open space. It was part of a PUD Amendment Application in 2013, whereby 2 duplex lots were down-zoned to 3 single-family lots with limitations on building coverage. It is a sunny and windy site even for Wildridge standards. PLANNING ANALYSIS Lot Coverage, Setback and Easements: The lot has traditional Wildridge building envelope and easements: Front Side Back Drainage 25’ 7.5’ 10’ 10’ on each side The proposal conforms with the setbacks and an ILC will be required at roofing to demonstrate compliance on the west side. The footprint was limited to 2,500 s.f. during the PUD process and measures 2,499 s.f. This will be confirmed through ILC. Building Height: The maximum building height permitted for this property is 35’ and the building height is measured at 34’-11”. The only way to stay under 35’ was through a 1.75:12 roof pitch, discussed in the AEC section, below. An ILC will be required to assure that the height limit is met. DESIGN STANDARDS ANALYSIS: Landscaping: The proposal’s landscape plan focuses on the north part of the site, largely between the building and the street edge. The primary pallet is spruce, aspen, several shrub species, ground cover, mulch, and native grasses. Several trees are located within the easement, and therefore do not count towards the total Landscaping Units required of the property, per code. In total, 120 Units are required and 86 are proposed. A discussion of the March 3, 2020 PZC Meeting – 5091 Wildridge Road East House 2 discrepancy is in the AEC section, below. Building Design, Building Materials and Colors: The proposed exterior building materials are stained wood siding, quartzite, and corten tiles. Colors were reviewed for conformance with Sec. 7.28.090(j)(4)(viii), Building Materials, and determined to comply with the design standards. Roof Material and Pitch: The applicant proposes a main 1.75:12 pitch metal shed roof, with shingled gable roofs at 4:12 pitch. As the roof pitch is not compliant with applicable AMC regulations, an AEC is required, discussed below. Exterior Lighting: Proposed lighting conforms with the Dark Sky Ordinance. Design Standards for the Wildridge Subdivision: AMC states: (1) Intent: (i) To preserve and enhance the aesthetic qualities of the natural hillsides by designing projects which relate to the slope of the land and minimize the amount of project grading; and (ii) To promote development which is visually compatible with the natural topography of the surrounding area. (2) Building Height on Steep Slopes. Determining building height on steep slopes has frequently resulted in three-story walls on the downhill side that create an overbearing presence on properties below. Therefore, the visual impact of building height and massing on lots with steep slopes shall be reduced by articulating the building facades and creating proportional stories in a multi-story building. Building height will be reduced for buildings or portions of buildings with flat roofs as follows: (A) Four-to-twelve (4:12) roof slopes or greater: thirty-five (35) feet. (B) Less than a four-to-twelve (4:12) roof slope: thirty (30) feet. (3) Building Design: (i) Buildings shall have street-facing architectural details and elements which provide a human scale to the facade. Flat, monotonous facades shall be avoided. (A) The design of a structure shall create variety and interest along the street elevation. A significant alteration of the massing and composition (not just the exterior colors and materials) of each house or each townhouse or duplex unit must be accomplished. (B) The use of architectural features that increase visual prominence should be avoided. Massive, tall elements, such as two-story entries, turrets and large chimneys, should be avoided. Such elements on the downhill face of the structure are of particular concern. Due to the site constraints, the house perches on the ground with little site grading. The 1:175 roof pitch is subject to a 30-foot height maximum, and is part of the AEC. MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN & DESIGN REVIEW - REVIEW CRITERIA: § 7.16.080(f), Development Plan 1. Evidence of substantial compliance with the purpose of the Development Code as specified in §7.04.030, Purposes; Staff Response: The application generally complies with the applicable purposes outlined in the Development Code. Purpose (a) states, “Divide the Town into zones, restricting and requiring therein the location, erection, construction, reconstruction, alteration and use of buildings, structures and land for trade, industry, residence and other specified uses; regulate the intensity of the use of lot areas; regulate and determine the area of open spaces surrounding such buildings; establish building lines and locations of buildings designed for specified March 3, 2020 PZC Meeting – 5091 Wildridge Road East House 3 industrial, commercial, residential and other uses within such areas; establish standards to which buildings or structures shall conform; establish standards for use of areas adjoining such buildings or structures.” 2. Evidence of substantial compliance with §7.16.090, Design Review; Staff Response: This Major Design and Development Plan Application should be assessed for compliance with the Design Review criteria of the Development Code, found below. The Design Review section seeks quality development and structures that are visually harmonious with the site and the surrounding vicinity. 3. Consistency with the Avon Comprehensive Plan; Staff Response: The site is located in the Northern Residential District (District 11 of the Comprehensive Plan), which states, “Due to the limited number of existing trees and shrubs and the open character of the property, special care should be taken to ensure that all structures are compatible with one another and in harmony with the natural surroundings.” This District includes principles that encourage minimal alteration to the natural environment and steep slope development. The Goals and Policies contained in the Comprehensive Plan, include, “Policy G.2.1: Identify and avoid development in environmentally sensitive areas or steep hillsides.” PZC should carefully assess if this application is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 4. Consistency with any previously approved and not revoked subdivision plat, planned development, or any other precedent plan or land use approval for the property as applicable; Staff Response: The application conforms with the accompanying requirements of the PUD zoning and the Development Code, except where an AEC is needed. Conformance with the building envelope and maximum elevation are confirmed with the application. 5. Compliance with all applicable development and design standards set forth in this Code, including but not limited to the provisions in Chapter 7.20, Zone Districts and Official Zoning Map, Chapter 7.24, Use Regulations, and Chapter 7.28, Development Standards; and Staff Response: The analysis contained in this staff report addresses all applicable Development Code standards, except where an AEC is needed. 6. That the development can be adequately served by city services including but not limited to roads, water, wastewater, fire protection, and emergency medical services. Staff Response: Staff referred the proposal to the Eagle River Water and Sanitation District (ERWSD) for compliance with the property’s’ water allocation and received no response. Staff added the successful completion of any ERWSD requirements as a condition of approval for this application. All special services are well established in the subdivision. §7.16.090(f), Design Review: 1. The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community; or, where redevelopment is anticipated, relates the development to the character of Avon as a whole; Staff Response: The application proposes a design that relates to the character of the surrounding community. 2. The design meets the development and design standards established in this Development Code; and Staff Response: The design is compliant with the development and design standards contained in the Development Code. March 3, 2020 PZC Meeting – 5091 Wildridge Road East House 4 3. The design reflects the long- range goals and design criteria from the Avon Comprehensive Plan and other applicable, adopted plan documents. Staff Response: Applicable adopted plans include the Avon Comprehensive Plan and provisions of the Development Code. The design has been evaluated for conformance with these plans and staff has determined the proposed design meets the requirements, except as described below. ALTERNATIVE EQUIVALENT COMPLIANCE: Alternative equivalent compliance is a procedure that allows development to meet the intent of the design-related provisions of the code through an alternative design. It is not a general waiver or weakening of regulations; rather, this application procedure permits a site-specific plan that is equal to or better than the strict application of a design standard specified in the Development Code. This procedure is not intended as a substitute for a variance or administrative modification or a vehicle for relief from standards in this Chapter. Alternative compliance shall apply only to the specific site for which it is requested and does not establish a precedent for assured approval of other requests. AEC REQUEST: The roof pitch for the metal roofs is requested at 1.75:12 instead of the required 3:12 and the building is over 30’ for portions that are less than 4:12 pitch and; the landscaping LU request is to include 86 instead of the required 120. AEC REVIEW CRITERIA: The PZC shall use the following review criteria as the basis for a decision on an application for alternative equivalent compliance: 1. The proposed alternative achieves the intent of the subject design or development standard to the same or better degree than the subject standard; 2. The proposed alternative achieves the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan to the same or better degree than the subject standard; 3. The proposed alternative results in benefits to the community that are equivalent to or better than compliance with the subject standard; and 4. The proposed alternative imposes no greater impacts on adjacent properties than would occur through compliance with the specific requirements of this Title. APPLICANT RESPONSE: The applicant presents a detailed response in Attachment B. For landscaping, it argues that the reduction still achieves the look from the street, and the downhill side is infeasible for landscaping. For the roof pitch, the general argument is that it lowers the building form and responds to steep slopes. STAFF RESPONSE: The applicant already achieved LU reductions by retaining 300+ s.f. of native vegetation (10% award) and 80% or more of total landscaped area on temporary irrigation (50% award). These reductions are allowed by code to encourage a softer and more water-efficient approach, and PZC should carefully weigh if further reductions achieve the other purposes of the Landscape Code. Select purposes are included below: (1) Integrates building sites with natural topography and existing vegetation; (2) Minimizes disturbed areas; The property line is far from the road which limits developable area due to the steep slopes. Likewise, due to the slope, having four (4) sided landscaping is moot from both the owner’s perspective and for the general public. The south facing hill is simply not a good candidate for landscaping and staff is sympathetic to the minimalist proposal. Likewise, the building is pushed to the west to accommodate the slope and additional units do not count there. In total, 21 LUs in three (3) trees were not counted. While 86 LUs count for the application, 107 are March 3, 2020 PZC Meeting – 5091 Wildridge Road East House 5 present. The District description in the Comprehensive Plan states that, “Due to the limited number of existing trees and shrubs and the open character of the property, special care should be taken to ensure that all structures are compatible with one another and in harmony with the natural surroundings.” Several Comprehensive Plan statements talk of preserving water and natural resources, architecture that breaks up building mass, and view corridors. PZC is instructed to carefully weigh if the application achieves the review criteria. Mandating a minimum 3:12 metal pitch creates attractive angled roof shapes and may diminish the vertical mass of a structure. Code states: Secondary roofs shall have a four-to-twelve (4:12) minimum and metal roofs shall have a three-to-twelve (3:12) minimum. Flat roofs may be permitted as secondary roofs or if the flat roof is consistent with the architectural style of the building. (ii) All buildings shall incorporate roofline modulation. (iii) Large expanses of bright, reflective materials are not permitted; however, standing seam metal, copper or weathering steel (corten) may be acceptable. Further, as discussed above, roof slopes less than 4:12 require a thirty (30) foot height maximum. This proposal pushes the height to 34’ 11”. As there is little development directly below the property, the rationale for the height limitation (to limit an overbearing presence on properties below) is less relevant. Lot 3 has the same ownership as Lot 1, directly to the west. From the downward street approach, the shed form presents a jutting angle extending into space (similar to the center rendering on sheet A0.0, below and the picture to the left). From the upward approach, the form compliments the natural slope of the site The Comprehensive Plan District Planning Principles state, “Encourage and support development that… • Prohibits significant alteration of natural environment as well as ridgeline and steep slope development. This area should be highly sensitive to visual impacts of improvements, wildlife preservation, and lighting.” In all, staff is sympathetic of the site constraints and appreciates the intent of the minimal grading. The large metal roof is a product of embracing the constraints of the property. This home is proposed as mountain modern, which favors lower pitched roofs, unique structure shape, and large windows. A large reflective surface at the low angle is not ideal but the black standing seam choice makes the proposal more palatable. PZC should carefully weigh if the application achieves the review criteria. View from the house approach. The prominent ridge is highlighted with a black line. March 3, 2020 PZC Meeting – 5091 Wildridge Road East House 6 STAFF RECOMMENDATION FOR AEC20001: Staff recommends approval of the AEC application for Lot 3 Wildridge Point Subdivision with the following findings: Findings: 1. The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.120, Alternative Equivalent Compliance; 2. The proposed alternatives achieve the intent of §7.28.050(e) Landscaping Units, and §7.28.090(d)(4), Roofs, to the same or better degree than the subject standard; 3. The proposed alternative achieves the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan to the same or better degree than the subject standard; 4. The proposed alternative results in benefits to the community that are equivalent to or better than compliance with the subject standard; and 5. The proposed alternative imposes no greater impacts on adjacent properties than would occur through compliance with the specific requirements of the Code. RECOMMENDED MOTION: “I move to approve Case #AEC20001, an Alternative Equivalent Compliance application for Lot 3 Wildridge Point Subdivision together with the findings as recommended by staff.” STAFF RECOMMENDATION FOR MJR20002: Staff recommends approval of the Major Development Plan for Lot 3 Wildridge Point, with the following findings and condition: Findings: 1. The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.080(f), Development Plan, §7.16.090(f), Design Review. The design meets the development and design standards established in the Avon Development Code; 2. The application is complete; 3. The application provides sufficient information to allow the PZC to determine that the application complies with the relevant review criteria; 4. The application complies with the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan; 5. The demand for public services or infrastructure exceeding current capacity is mitigated by the application; and 6. The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community. Condition: 1. ILCs are required to confirm building height, location and footprint. RECOMMENDED MOTION: “I move to approve Case #MJR20002, an application for Major Design and Development Plan for Lot 3 Wildridge Point Subdivision together with the findings of fact and condition outlined by Staff.” ATTACHMENTS: A. Application Materials B. PZC Narrative and AEC Application Responses Thank you, David McWilliams 970-749-4023 / cmcwilliams@avon.org Lot size: 0.809 acres = 27,959 s.f. Zoning: RSM (Residential Suburban Medium Density) Single Family lot Maximum Lot Coverage Allowed by Plat = FOOTPRINT OF 2,500 s.f. (Avon Development Code Definition: Footprint, also called ground level footprint, means the outline of the total area which is covered by a building perimeter at ground level.) Minimum Landscape Area Allowed = 25% of Lot Area 27,959s.f.= 6,989.75 s.f. Building height allowed=35'-0" Proposed building height= 34'-11" (<35'-0"allowed) Proposed Livable Area = 5186.1 s.f. Proposed Lot coverage by building footprint =2,499.3 s.f. (.09% of LOT) (<2,500 s.f.) Proposed Lot coverage by building/footprint =2499.3 s.f. (allowed footprint of <2,500 s.f. by plat) Proposed Impervious area (Building ) 2,499 s.f. + 1420 s.f. (drive) +122 s.f. (entry terrace) = 4,041 s.f. Proposed Landscape area (Lot area= 27,959 s.f.)-(10,287.27 s.f. non development area) = 17,671.73 s.f. 17,671.73 s.f. developable area -4,041 s.f. (imperv. area) = 13,630.73 s.f. Landscape area of the 13,630.73 s.f., 5028 s.f. of area is outside the limits of disturbance fencing 13,630.73 s.f. -5028 s.f. = 8602.73 s.f. Landscape area within the disturbed surface Platted non development area =10,287.27 s.f. +13,630.73 s.f. = 23,918 s.f. of landscape area (85.5 %) Drive area = 1420 s.f. Snow storage = 20% of 1420 s.f. Drive = 284 s.f. of snow storage Proposed Area: see Sheet A0.1 Livable Area: 5186.1 s.f. Garage Area: 775.1 s.f. Parking Requirements: 3 spaces required Exterior Lighting: Dark sky compliant, PROPOSED AEC: 1 ROOF PITCH OF TWO ROOF FORMS AT 1.75:12 FOR A METAL ROOF (Development Code roof pitch min. for metal roof = 3:12) 2 50 % REDUCTION OF THE LANDSCAPE UNITS (Landscape units decreased from 172 units to 86 units)970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject No.:DateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION2/26/2020 11:34:14 AMA0.0COVER1751Wildridge Point -Lot 3PLANNING AND ZONING SET02-18-20Custom Residence5091 Wildridge Road EastAvon, Colorado 81620Wildridge Point -Lot 3 PLANNING AND ZONING SET Custom Residence 5091 Wildridge Road East Avon, Colorado 81620 02-18-20 No.DescriptionDatePROJECT INFORMATION Single Family Residence Owner: Mountain C. I. Holdings Limited 1480 SANDHILL DR UNIT 4 ANCASTER ON L9G 4V5 CANADA Location: 5091 Wildridge Road East Avon, Colorado 81620 Lot 3, SUB: Wildridge Point Parcel #:1943-351-04-002 Class of Work: New Type of Construction: Type V-B Type of Occupancy: R3 (single family) Levels: 2-story +basement Heating system: Gas/ 92% min eff. Lower level and garage are to be hydronic radiant heat Main level and upper level to be forced air system Air Conditioning on Main and upper levels only Fire Sprinkler system: NO Architect:Martin Manley Architects Jeffrey P Manley AIA PO Box 1587 Eagle, CO 81631 970.328.5151 jeff@martinmanleyarchitects.com Contractor:General Contractor: DW Dantas Construction LLC Dave Dantas PO Box 2322 Avon, CO 81620 970.376.6111 dave@dwdantas.com 12" = 1'-0" ZONING SUMMARY Sheet List Sheet Number Sheet Name A0.0 COVER A0.1 AREA CALCULATIONS A0.2 ECO SHEET A1.1 SITE PLAN A1.2 LANSCAPE PLAN A1.3 IRRIGATION PLAN A1.4 CONSTRUCT. MGMT A2.0 LOWER LEVEL PLAN A2.1 MAIN LEVEL PLAN A2.2 UPPER LEVEL PLAN A2.3 ROOF PLAN A3.0 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A3.1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A4.0 BUILDING SECTIONS A4.1 BUILDING SECTIONS A4.2 BUILDING SECTIONS A5.0 DETAILS A6.0 LOWER LEVEL RCP A6.1 MAIN AND UPPER LEVEL RCP Attachment A DW DWDW UP WDDN 2499.3 SF Lower Level Area 2406.6 SF Main Level Area open to below 280.2 SF Upper Level Area 775.1 SF Garage 970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION2/26/2020 11:34:17 AMA0.1AREA CALCULATIONS1751Wildridge Point -Lot 3PLANNING AND ZONING SET02-18-20Custom Residence5091 Wildridge Road EastAvon, Colorado 81620No.DescriptionDate1/8" = 1'-0"1 A1.0 LOWER LEVEL 1/8" = 1'-0"2 A2.0 MAIN LEVEL 1/8" = 1'-0"3 A3.0 UPPER LEVEL Area Schedule (Habitable) Name Area Lower Level Area 2499.3 SF Main Level Area 2406.6 SF Upper Level Area 280.2 SF Grand total: 3 5186.1 SF Area Schedule (Garage) Name Area Garage 775.1 SF Grand total: 1 775.1 SF Attachment A 70.8'8473.2'8475.3'8481.7'8488.1'8433.6'8427.5'8424.3'8470.5'8484.8'8479.6'8477.4'S59°44'49"E208.25'N30°15'11"E100.00'N44°09'05"W160.90'5 REBARNUM CAP No. 27598SEWER MANHOLE 0780RIM ELEVATION=8426.0INVERT ELEVATION=8417.0BUILDING SETBACKB U I L D I N G S E T B A C KBUILDINGSETBACK BUILDING SETBACKNON DEVELOPABLE AREA(SHADED AREA)(R.N. 201309932)WILDRIDGE ROAD(50' R.O.W.)LOT 2L O T 3 0 .8 0 9 A C R E S A D D R E S S : 5 0 9 1 W I L D R I D G E R O A D E A S T N34°33'45"E - 371.04'30' UTILTIY EASEMENT(RECEPTION No. 226431)95.91'206.51'40.39'55.68'110.96'UTILITY &DRAINAGEEASEMENT(R.N. 201309932)UTILITY &DRAINAGEEASEMENT(R.N. 201309932)S L O P E M A I N T E N A N C E , S N O W S T O R A G E & D R A I N A G E E A S E M E N T (R .N . 2 2 6 4 3 1 ) 8 4 7 4 '-6 " 8 4 7 3 '-9 " 8 4 7 3 '-0 " 8 4 7 2 '-9 " 8 4 7 3 '-6 "848485'8480'8475'8470'8465'8460'8455'8450'8445'8440'8435'8430'8425'8420'8415'8410'8405'8400'8395'8390'8385838025'-0"7'-6" 7'-6" 115'-0"15'-0"1 0 '-0 " 7 '-6 "10'-0"LOT 3 VIEWSCHALK CLIFFBEAVER THE TARNESBACHELOR GULCHSAWATCH RANGES UP T.O. WALL B.O. WALL 6'-0" 8473' SILT FENCING ALONG THE DOWNHILL SIDE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE FENCING 8467' T.O. WALL B.O. WALL 4'-0" 8467' 8463'<4% slope for the first 20'-0"20' - 0"DRAINAGEDRAINAGEDRAINAGE OWNER OF LOT 3 IS THE SAME OWNER AS LOT 2. CONTRACTOR WILL USE LOT 2 FOR STAGING AND REVEG AT THE END OF CONSTRUCTION AS NEEDED D R AIN A G E + 8467'-0" + 8466'-6" DRAINAGE + 8466-6" + 8465'-6" + 8467'-0" + 8471'-0" + 8473'-0" 14' - 0" 6 ' - 0 "26' - 0"8472' - 6" 8473' - 0"8473' - 0" EXISTING GUARDRAIL GUARDRAIL IS TO BE SHORTENED 12'-0" AND SIGN IS TO BE RELOCTED TO EAST SIDE OF DRIVE 25' - 0" T.O. WALL B.O. WALL 2'-0" 8473' 8471'DRAINAGEDISTURBANCE IS TO LIMITED TO CONNECTION TO SEWER LINE IN THIS AREA 8470' 8460' 8462' 8464' 8466' 8468' 8458' 8450' 8452' 8454' 8456' 8448' 8440' 8442' 8444' 8446' 8451' - 0"8451' - 0" 8466'8468'8472' 8474'8472'8476' 8474' 8474' 8476' 8478' 8480' 8472' 8470' 8460' 8458' 8450' 8452' 8454' 8456'8470'DRAINAGE DRAINAGEDRAINAGE D R A IN A G E T.O. WALL B.O. WALL 5'-0"8473' 8468' CONCRETE RETAINING/COUNTERFORT WALL WITH STUCCO FINISH AND GUARD RAIL AT TOP DRIVE AREA TOTAL = 1420 S.F. SNOW STORAGE = 20%= 284 S.F.SNO W STO RAG ESNO W STO R AG EGUEST SPACE D RAINAG EDRAINAGEDRAINAGE8466' + 8465'-0" 8470' 8466'2 LIFTS OF ASPHALT ON ROAD BASE ON COMPACTED STRUCTURAL FILL CONCRETE PAVERS ON CONCRETE STRUCTURAL SLAB SUPPORTED ON COUNTER FORTS OFF BUILDING CONCRETE SLAB SUPPORTED BY COUNTERFORTS BELOW STEP STEP STEPD R AIN A G E DRAINAGE D R AIN A G E T.O. WALL B.O. WALL 4'-0"8462' 8466'DRAINAGE970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION2/26/2020 11:34:23 AMA1.1SITE PLAN1751Wildridge Point -Lot 3PLANNING AND ZONING SET02-18-20Custom Residence5091 Wildridge Road EastAvon, Colorado 816201/8" = 1'-0"1 A0.0 SITE PLAN No.DescriptionDateTrue North Project North Attachment A 8473.2'8475.3'8481.7'8488.1'8433.6'8427.5'8484.8'8479.6'8477.4'S59°44'49"E208.25'N30°15'11"E100.00'N44°09'05"W160.90'EBARM CAPo. 27598SEWER MANHOLE 0780BUILDING SETBACKB U I L D I N G S E T B A C KBUILDINGSETBACK WILDRIDGEL O T 3 0 .8 0 9 A C R E S A D D R E S S : 5 0 9 1 W I L D R I D G E R O A D E A S T N34°33'45"E - 371.04'30' UTILTIY EASEMENT(RECEPTION No. 226431)206.51'UTILITY &DRAINAGEEASEMENT(R.N. 201309932)UTILITY &DRAINAGEEASEMENT(R.N. 201309932)S L O P E M A I N T E N A N C E , S N O W S T O R A G E & D R A I N A G E E A S E M E N T (R .N . 2 2 6 4 3 1 ) 8 4 7 3 '-9 " 8 4 7 3 '-0 " 8 4 7 2 '-9 " 8 4 7 3 '-6 "8485'8480'8475'8470'8465'8460'8455'8450'8445'8435'8425'8420'8415'25'-0"7'-6" 7'-6"15'-0"1 0 '-0 " 7 '-6 "10'-0"S UP SILT FENCING ALONG THE DOWNHILL SIDE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE FENCING <4% slope for the first 20'-0"20' - 0"DRAINAGEDRAINAGEDRAINAGE OWNER OF LOT 3 IS THE SAME OWNER AS LOT 2. CONTRACTOR WILL USE LOT 2 FOR STAGING AND REVEG AT THE END OF CONSTRUCTION AS NEEDED D R AIN A G E + 8467'-0" + 8466'-6" DRAINAGE + 8466-6" + 8465'-6" + 8467'-0" + 8471'-0" + 8473'-0" 14' - 0" 6 ' - 0 "26' - 0"8472' - 6" 8473' - 0"8473' - 0" EXISTING GUARDRAIL 25' - 0"DRAINAGEDISTURBANCE IS TO LIMITED TO CONNECTION TO SEWER LINE IN THIS AREA 8470' 8460' 8462' 8464' 8466' 8468' 8458' 8450' 8452' 8454' 8456' 8448' 8440' 8442' 8444' 8446' 8451' - 0"8451' - 0" 8466'8468'8472' 8474'8472'8476' 8474' 8476' 8478' 8480' 8472' 8470' 8460' 8458' 8450' 8452' 8454' 8456'8470'DRAINAGE DRAINAGEDRAINAGE D R A IN A G E GUEST SPACE DRAINA GEDRAINAGEDRAINAGE8466' + 8465'-0" 8470' 8466'2 LIFTS OF ASPHALT ON ROAD BASE ON COMPACTED STRUCTURAL FILL CONCRETE PAVERS ON CONCRETE STRUCTURAL SLAB SUPPORTED ON COUNTER FORTS OFF BUILDING CONCRETE SLAB SUPPORTED BY COUNTERFORTS BELOW STEP STEP STEPD R AIN A G E DRAINAGE D R AIN A G E DRAINAGEQ AQA Q A Q A Q A Q A Q A Trees within easements do not count toward landscape units Trees within easements do not count toward landscape units C S C S CE L L S P S P L L L LLL L L L L L L L L CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CECECE CE CE CE CECECECEDRAINAGE Landscape and Irrigation table AREA MATRIX: Zoning: RSM (Residential Suburban Medium Density) Single Family lot ZONING INFORMATION-Lot 3 Lot size: 0.809 acres = 27,959 s.f. Maximum Lot Coverage Allowed by Plat =FOOTPRINT OF 2,500 s.f. Minimum Landscape Area Allowed = 25% of Lot Area 27,959s.f.= 6,989.75 s.f. Proposed Lot coverage by building/footprint =2499 s.f. (allowed footprint of <2,500 s.f. by plat) Proposed Impervious area (Building ) 2,499 s.f. + 1420 s.f. (drive) +122 s.f. (entry terrace) = 4,041 s.f. Proposed Landscape area (Lot area= 27,959 s.f.)-(10,287.27 s.f. non development area) = 17,671.73 s.f. 17,671.73 s.f. developable area -4,041 s.f. (imperv. area) = 13,630.73 s.f. Landscape area of the 13,630.73 s.f., 5028 s.f. of area is outside the limits of disturbance fencing 13,630.73 s.f. -5028 s.f. = 8602.73 s.f. Landscape area of disturbed surface Platted non development area =10,287.27 s.f. +13,630.73 s.f. = 23,918 s.f. of landscape area (85.5 %) Proposed Temp Irrigation only in reveg. seeded areas. Temp irrigation to be removed after establish of seeded areas. Landscape Units = 8602.73 s.f. / 50 s.f. per unit =172.05 units DUE TO STEEPNESS OF LOT AN AEC IS REQUESTED to a total of 120.44 units (reduce by 30%) 25% Landscape Units to be provided be trees = 25% of 86 units =21.5 units by trees Landscape Material (trees)New Existing retained Units Deciduous 2.5" -4" caliper/clump = 7 units per tree X 4=28 9 units per tree X 0 =0 28 units Evergreen 6'-8' high =6 units per tree X 2 =12 11 units per tree X 0=11 12 units Landscape Material (shrubs)New Existing retained Units Shrubs, 5 gallon = 1 unit per shrub X 12 =28 1.2 units per shrub X 0 =0 28 units Perennial Ground covers Units 1 unit per 400 s.f. 1200 s.f. proposed / 400 s.f.=3 units 3 units Hardscape Material Units Awarded calculation Units Shredded Bark (mulch at planting beds around trees)1/500 s.f. 1000 s.f. planting bed area/500 =2 2 Units subtotal 73 units Retained Existing Vegetation Mass Bonus Landscape Units Awarded 300+ square feet of native Vegetation 10% Proposed Undisturbed Native vegetation Area = 900 s.f.< 300 s.f. Bonus to be applied 10 % of 73 units =7.3 7.3 units subtotal 80.3 units Drip Irrigation Bonus Landscape Units Awarded 80% or more of total landscaped area on temporary irrigation 50% 50 % of 80.3 units = 40.15 Bonus to be applied 40.15units Total Landscape Units Proposed (86 proposed by AEC)120.45 units NOTE: TREES WITHIN UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE NOT COUNTED IN UNIT TOTAL CountSizeSymbolName GC Perennial Ground covers 1200 square feet of cover. Mulched Areas SHREDDED BARK MULCHED AREA -AROUND TREES AND SHRUBS NOT COVERED BY GROUND COVER Natural Grass Areas (reveg) MIX OF GRASSES AND FESCUE SEED. ARKANSAS VALLEY SEED COMPANY, NATIVE LOW GROW MOUNTAIN MIX.8700 S.F., IS TO SPRAYED WITH A FERTILIZER AND SEED MIX. PROVIDE SOIL STABLIZATION MESH AND HAY AT SEEDED AREAS. MULCH NG Temp surface drip irrigation. Areas are to become more natural looking. Temp irrigation will be removed after re- establishment of root system. approximately 2 years/growing seasons. GROUND COVER NATURAL GRASS AREA IRRIGATION NOTE: 1 ALL RESEEDED AREAS ARE TO TEMPORARY DRIP IRRIGATION 2 THE GROUND COVER AND PLANTING BEDS ARE TO RECIEVE PERMANENT MICRO SPRAY AND DRIP IRRIGATION TOTAL OF PERMANENT DRIP AND SPRAY IRRIGATION AREA OF 2,200 S.F. SNOW IN SUMMER, STONECROP, CREEPING PHLOX, NATIVE LOW -GROW GRASSES, ROCKY MTN. FESCUE 1000 square feet of cover. 6000 square feet of cover. QA Deciduous Trees Count QUAKING ASPEN (POPULUS TREMULOIDES) 2.5" -4" CAL. Size 4 + 3 4 + 3 Symbol Name Deciduous Shrubs LL DWARF KOREAN LILAC (SYRINGA MEYERI 'PALABIN') OR Fendler ceanothus, mountain-lilac #5.8 28 CE #5 18COTONEASTER DAMMERI CORAL BEAUTY (COTONEASTER DAMMERI) CS Conifer Trees 6'-8' tall 2 4 Colorado Spruce (Picea pungens) Q A CS LLS P C E SP #5 2SPIREA, ANTHONY WATERER (Spiraea japonica ‘Anthony Waterer’)970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION2/26/2020 11:34:31 AMA1.2LANSCAPE PLAN1751Wildridge Point -Lot 3PLANNING AND ZONING SET02-18-20Custom Residence5091 Wildridge Road EastAvon, Colorado 81620No.DescriptionDate1/8" = 1'-0"1 A0.0 LANDSCAPE PLAN 12" = 1'-0" Landscape Units 1/8" = 1'-0" LANDSCAPE LEGEND Gas meter on downward side of ret. wall Attachment A 8473.2'8475.3'8481.7'.1'8433.6'8427.5'8484.8'8479.6'8477.4'S59°44'49"E208.25'N30°15'11"E100.00'N44°09'05"W160.90'ARAP7598SEWER MANHOLE 0780BUILDING SETBACKB U I L D I N G S E T B A C KBUILDINGSETBACK WILL O T 3 0 .8 0 9 A C R E S A D D R E S S : 5 0 9 1 W I L D R I D G E R O A D E A S T N34°33'45"E - 371.04'30' UTILTIY EASEMENT(RECEPTION No. 226431)206.51'UTILITY &DRAINAGEEASEMENT(R.N. 201309932)UTILITY &DRAINAGEEASEMENT(R.N. 201309932)S L O P E M A I N T E N A N C E , S N O W S T O R A G E & D R A I N A G E E A S E M E N T (R .N . 2 2 6 4 3 1 ) 8 4 7 3 '-9 " 8 4 7 3 '-0 " 8 4 7 2 '-9 " 8 4 7 3 '-6 "8485'8480'8475'8470'8465'8460'8455'8450'8445'8435'8425'8420'8415'25'-0"7'-6" 7'-6"15'-0"1 0 '-0 " 7 '-6 "10'-0"S UP SILT FENCING ALONG THE DOWNHILL SIDE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE FENCING <4% slope for the first 20'-0"20' - 0"DRAINAGEDRAINAGEDRAINAGE OWNER OF LOT 3 IS THE SAME OWNER AS LOT 2. CONTRACTOR WILL USE LOT 2 FOR STAGING AND REVEG AT THE END OF CONSTRUCTION AS NEEDED D R AIN A G E + 8467'-0" + 8466'-6"+ 8466-6" + 8465'-6" + 8471'-0" + 8473'-0" 14' - 0" 6 ' - 0 "26' - 0"8472' - 6" 8473' - 0"8473' - 0" EXISTING GUARDRAIL 25' - 0" DISTURBANCE IS TO LIMITED TO CONNECTION TO SEWER LINE IN THIS AREA 8470' 8460' 8462' 8464' 8466' 8468' 8458' 8450' 8452' 8454' 8456' 8448' 8440' 8442' 8444' 8446' 8451' - 0"8451' - 0" 8466'8468'8472' 8474'8472'8476' 8474' 8476' 8478' 8480' 8472' 8470' 8460' 8458' 8450' 8452' 8454' 8456'8470'DRAINAGE DRAINAGEDRAINAGE D R A IN A G E GUEST SPACE D RAINAG EDRAINAGEDRAINAGE8466' + 8465'-0" 8470' 8466' CONCRETE SLAB SUPPORTED BY COUNTERFORTS BELOW STEP STEP STEPD R AIN A G E DRAINAGE D R AIN A G E DRAINAGEQ AQA Q A Q A Q A Q A Q ACS C S CE L L S P S P L L L LLL L L L L L L L L CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CECE CE CE CE CE CECECECEDRAINAGEAC CONTROLLER back flow valve manual shut-off valve VALVE ASSEMBLY Sensor stake in ground to read soil moisture content THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE DESIGNED BY THE LANDSCAPE SUBCONTRACTOR. The design shall: (A) Prevent runoff, low head drainage, overspray, or other similar conditions where irrigation water flows onto non-targeted areas, such as adjacent property, non-irrigated areas, hardscapes, roadways, or structures. Restrictions regarding overspray and runoff may be modified if the landscape area is adjacent to permeable surfacing and no runoff occurs or if the adjacent non-permeable surfaces are designed and constructed to drain entirely to landscaping. (B) Conform to the hydrozones of the landscape design plan. (C) Have matched precipitation rates within a hydrozone, unless otherwise directed by the manufacturer's recommendations. (D) Meet the required operating pressure of the emission devices using valve pressure regulators, sprinkler head pressure regulators, inline pressure regulators, booster pumps, or other devices. The pressure and flow measurements identified at the design stage will be verified prior to the installation of the system. (E) Meet the requirements set in the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) standard, ASABE/ICC 802-2014 "Landscape Irrigation Sprinkler and Emitter Standard authored by the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers and the International Code Council and verified by an independent third-party. (F) Achieve the highest possible sprinkler spacing distribution uniformity using the manufacturer's recommendations. All sprinkler head installed in the turfgrass areas shall have a distribution uniformity of 0.65 or higher using the protocol defined in ASABE/ICC 802-2014 standard. 22A IRRIGATION NOTE: 1 ALL RESEEDED AREAS ARE TO TEMPORARY DRIP IRRIGATION 2 THE GROUND COVER AND PLANTING BEDS ARE TO RECIEVE PERMANENT MICRO SPRAY AND DRIP IRRIGATION 3 ALL TEMPORARY IRRIGATION SHALL BE INSTALLED ABOVE GROUND AND PHYSICALLY REMOVED AFTER 2 GROWING SEASONS OR AFTER PLANT ESTABLISHMENT, WHICHEVER COMES FIRST. TOTAL OF PERMANENT DRIP AND MICRO SPRAY IRRIGATION AREA OF 2,200 S.F. Proposed Landscape area (Lot area= 27,959 s.f.)-(10,287.27 s.f. non development area) = 17,671.73 s.f. 17,671.73 s.f. developable area -4,041 s.f. (imperv. area) - s.f. of area is outside the limits of disturbance fencing = 10,900 s.f. Landscape area of disturbed surface (Lot area= 27,959 s.f.)-(imprervious area= 4041 s.f.)= 23,916 s.f. total landscape area Total irrigated area 10,900 (45 % of the total landscape area) Total Permanent Drip irrigation =1000 s.f. (4.2% of irrigation total) *at trees provide 1 gallon per hour, 3 times a week * shrubs provide 1 gallon per hour, 3 times a week Total Permanent micro spray irrigation =1200 s.f. (5.0% of irrigation total) *at planting beds and ground covers place mirco spray at 8'-0" spacing. 1/2 gallon per minute, 3 times a week Total Permanent pop-up spray irrigation =0 s.f. (0% of irrigation total) * at sodded mountain mix, water at volumes as recommented by the 'Water Wise residential guide for Western Colorado' 3 times a week Total Temporary drip irrigation -8700 s.f. Total irrigated landscape area for the first 2 growing seasons = 10,900 s.f. Total permanent irrigation =2,200 s.f. (after 2 growing seasons) Total non-irrigated area after 2 growing seasons = 21,716 (91 % of total landscape area) Permanent drip irrigation at aspen trees and planting beds 1000 s.f. Permanent micro spray irrigation ground cover planting beds 1200 s.f. Use the following table as a guideline for how long to run your drip system (Note: watering times are based on using 1.0 GPH Emitters):970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION2/26/2020 11:34:39 AMA1.3IRRIGATION PLAN1751Wildridge Point -Lot 3PLANNING AND ZONING SET02-18-20Custom Residence5091 Wildridge Road EastAvon, Colorado 81620No.DescriptionDate1/8" = 1'-0"1 A0.0 IRRIGATION PLAN 12" = 1'-0" IRRIGATION NOTES Attachment A S28°19'57"W - 220.01'S59°44'49"E208.25'N30°15'11"E100.00'∆=29°21'14"R=150.00' L=76.85'CH=N44°55'48"E 76.01'N44°09'05"W160.90'S48°45'07"W228.60'GUARDRAILFOUND No. 5 REBARWITH 1L.S. No. 5447FOUND No. 5 REBARWITH 11/2" ALUMINUM CAPL.S. No. 5447FOUND No. 5 REBARWITH 11/2" ALUMINUM CAPL.S. No. 27598FOUND No. 5 REBARWITH 11/2" ALUMINUM CAPL.S. No. 27598FOUND No. 5 REBARWITH 1L.S. No. 27598SET No. 5 REBARWITH 11/2" ALUMINUM CAPL.S. No. 27598FOUND No. 5 REBARWITH 11/2" ALUMINUM CAPL.S. No. 27598RIDGE = 8481.4(PROJECT BENCHMARK)SEWER MANHOLE 0860RIM ELEVATION=8415.6INVERT ELEVATION=8406.6TELEPHONEPEDESTALSSEWER MANHOLE 0780RIM ELEVATION=8426.0INVERT ELEVATION=8417.0EDGE OFASPHALT8463.58463.58462.78461.6BUILDING SETBACKB U I L D I N G S E T B A C KBUILDINGSETBACK BUILDING SETBACKNON DEVELOPABLE AREA(SHADED AREA)(R.N. 201309932)LOT 2TRACT KOWNER: TOWN OF AVON(RECEPTION No. 226431)L O T 3 0 .8 09 A C R E S A D D R E S S: 5 0 9 1 W I L D R I D G E R O A D E A S T N34°33'45"E - 371.04'30' UTILTIY EASEMENT(RECEPTION No. 226431)95.91'13.34'206.51'40.39'55.68'58.34'110.96'UTILITY &DRAINAGEEASEMENT(R.N. 201309932)UTILITY &DRAINAGEEASEMENT(R.N. 201309932)S L O P E M A I N T E N A N C E , S N O W S T O R A G E & D R A I N A G E E A S E M E N T (R .N . 2 2 6 4 3 1 )UTILITY &DRAINAGEN48°45'07"E-154.44'TANGENTCHORDCHORD BEARING145.06'208.55'N74°17'36"E35.99'70.00'S75°09'36"E42.64'82.04'N75°28'36"E39.29'76.01'N44°55'48"E8 4 7 2 '-9 "8485'8488'8470'8485'8480'8475'8470'8465'8460'8455'8450'8445'8440'8435'8430'8425'8420'8415'8410'8405'8400'8395'8390'8385'8380'8375'8371'7'-6" 7'-6" 143'-65_ 8"15'-0"15'-0"1 0 '-0 " 7 '-6 "10'-0"10'-0"LOT 3 VIEWSCHALK CLIFFBEAVER CREEKTHE TARNESBACHELOR GULCHSAWATCH RANGES PPWV S H Y D DN test boring #1 test boring #2 SILT FENCING ALONG THE DOWNHILL SIDE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE FENCING DISTURBANCE IS TO LIMITED TO CONNECTION TO SEWER LINE IN THIS AREA OWNER OF LOT 3 IS THE SAME OWNER AS LOT 2. CONTRACTOR WILL USE LOT 2 FOR STAGING AND REVEG AT THE END OF CONSTRUCTION AS NEEDED SEWERGASCABLE AND TELESOIL STOCKPILE DUMPSTER MATERIAL STORAGE IN GARAGE AND IN DRIVEWAY GRADING AND DRIVE ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS OUTSIDE PROPERTY LINE ARE SUBJECT TO A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT DURING CONSTRUCTION PROVIDE A 6" DEEP x 20' WIDE x A LENGTH OF 20' GRAVEL TRACKING PAD AT THE ACCESS POINT TO THE SITESEWERGAS CONNECT TO GAS MAIN IN EASEMENT GAS METER MOUNTED TO FOUNDATION WALL METER CLOSET ELECELECELEC TLT JOB SIGN WATER WATERMECH ROOM BELOW WATER METER SENSOR CONSTRUCTION TRUCK PARKING 970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION2/26/2020 11:34:39 AMA1.4CONSTRUCT. MGMT1751Wildridge Point -Lot 3PLANNING AND ZONING SET02-18-20Custom Residence5091 Wildridge Road EastAvon, Colorado 81620No.DescriptionDate1/16" = 1'-0"1 A0.0 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN Attachment A N44°09'05"WBUILDING SETBACK30' UTILTIY EASEMENTS L O P E M A I N T E N A N C E , 8 4 7 3 '-0 " 8 4 7 3 '-0 " 8 4 7 2 '-9 " 8 4 7 3 '-6 "25'-0"7'-6" 7'-6" DW BEAVER CREEKBACHELOR GULCHS A W A T C H R A N G E MECH MEETS NATURAL GRADE AT THIS POINT WET BAR HOT TUB FIREPLACEBEDROOM #4 BEDROOM #5 BILLARDS POWDER FAMILY ROOM TV / AV24' - 0"16' - 0"21' - 0"35' - 6 1/2" BEDROOM #3 MEETS NATURAL GRADE AT THIS POINT 62 17' TALL WALL 61'6 73 51 1 A4.1 1 A4.2 2 A4.0 5' - 0 1/2"8' - 7"4' - 8"13' - 10"2' - 2"8' - 9"4' - 3 1/2"12' - 5"1' - 4"13' - 11"8' - 9"16' - 0"18' - 3 1/2"2' - 3"2' - 10 1/2"3' - 7"1' - 11"12' - 3 1/2"14' - 0" 1' - 4"15' - 2 1/2"623' - 11"10' - 8 1/2"1' - 4"STORAGE 13' - 4 1/2"1' - 9"2' - 0"3' - 10"3' - 6"13' - 4 1/2" 2 A4.1 1 A4.0 22' - 10"12' - 8 1/2" 10' - 5 1/2" 4 A4.0 3 A4.0 96' - 6 1/2"38' - 0"5' - 0"10' - 0"23' - 0"1' - 4"5' - 6 1/2"16' - 1 1/2"1' - 4"4' - 0 1/2"5' - 9 1/2"9' - 4"4' - 6"25' - 0"1' - 4"5' - 7"4' - 9"13' - 4"1' - 4"5' - 7"4' - 9"13' - 4"1' - 4"11' - 6"5' - 0 1/2" 1' - 4"3' - 6"6' - 9 1/2"3' - 6"1' - 4" 1' - 5"8' - 3 1/2"13' - 10"4' - 8"4' - 3 1/2" CHASE 1' - 5 1/2"7' - 8"4' - 11"5' - 8 1/2"13' - 3 1/2"9' - 8 1/2"3' - 6"1' - 4" 16' - 5 1/2"23' - 2"10"14' - 2"10"14' - 0"10"26' - 3" 96' - 6 1/2"1' - 4"5' - 2"5' - 7"4' - 11"19' - 9 1/2"5' - 7 1/2"5' - 3"1' - 4"4"23' - 8"2 3/4"15' - 9 1/4" 5' - 3"5' - 9"3' - 3 1/2"4' - 3 1/2"4' - 9"5' - 6 1/2"1' - 4 1/2"8451' - 0" R @ 7"18 cubbies and towel hooks for hot tub low wall at stair edge may need a column here2 3/4"17' TALL WALL 22'-6" TALL WALL22'-6" TALL WALL 3 A4.1 2 A4.2 ELEV Rocky MTN elev product SRH-3SPV car=54x40 4' - 0 1/2"5' - 7" GLASS CORNER 5" FLOATING VANITY 6' - 0"4 1/2"6' - 1 1/2"RAIL2' - 7 1/2" REF 30" WINE 30" HORIZINTAL DUCT CHASE VERTICAL DUCT CHASE2499 S.F. FOOTPRINT (MAX. ALLOWED BY PLAT= 2500 S.F.)970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION2/26/2020 11:34:41 AMA2.0LOWER LEVEL PLAN1751Wildridge Point -Lot 3PLANNING AND ZONING SET02-18-20Custom Residence5091 Wildridge Road EastAvon, Colorado 81620True North Project North No.DescriptionDate1/4" = 1'-0"1 A1.0 LOWER LEVEL 2 3D View WET BAR S H O U L D W E H A V E U N D E R C O U N T E R R E F WINE DISPLAY WALL REMOVE CABINETS AND REF. FROM THIS WALL Attachment A BUILDING SETBACKLO T 3 80 9 A C R E S Y EASEMENTS L O P E M A I N T E N A N C E , S N O W S T O R A G E & G E E A S E M E N T 25'-0"7'-6" DWDW UP WDDW BEAVER CREEKBACHELOR GULCHS A W A T C H R A N G E FIREPLACEMEETS NATURAL GRADE AT THIS POINT MASTER BEDROOM #1 BEDROOM #2 KITCHEN PANTRY POWDER DINING LIVING TV / AVGRILL MAIN LEVEL DECK (covered) TOTAL AREA=790 S.F. MEETS NATURAL GRADE AT THIS POINT 16' - 10 1/2"6' - 0 1/2"DRESSING HER MASTER CLOSET 4' - 2 1/2"5' - 3 1/2"LAUNDRY REF 1 A4.1 1 A4.2 8460 8450 8440 8446 8456 8460 8450 8440 8446 8456 2 A4.0 13' - 0"5' - 11"9' - 1"5' - 11 1/2"5' - 0"5' - 6 1/2"5' - 3"5' - 0 1/2"5' - 3" 4' - 6"7' - 5 1/2"7' - 0"HIS MASTER CLOSET 3' - 8"61'6 under side of cantilever=60'13' - 0 1/2"4' - 7" 2 A4.1 1 A4.0 4 A4.0 9' - 10 1/2"3 A4.0 R @ 7 1/4"19 R @ 7"18 1' - 4"11' - 3"4' - 5"7' - 0"4' - 6"LIVING ROOM DECK (covered) MASTER DECK (covered) LOWER LEVEL WEST DECK BELOW (DRIP THRU) 8461' - 6" 24' - 0"16' - 0"21' - 0"35' - 6 1/2" 96' - 6 1/2"38' - 0"5' - 0"10' - 0"23' - 0"25' - 0"16' - 5 1/2"23' - 2"10"14' - 2"10"14' - 0"10"26' - 3" 96' - 6 1/2" 4"23' - 8"2 3/4"15' - 9 1/4"22' - 10"12' - 8 1/2"2' - 6" 2' - 9 1/2" 2' - 6" 13' - 5 1/2"1' - 10"3' - 5 1/2"21' - 3"8' - 11 1/2"4' - 3 1/2"3' - 9"1' - 2 1/2"9' - 5" 2' - 1 1/4" BEAM AT CLEARSTORY OPENING CEILING BEAM CEILING RIDGE BEAM 14' - 11"10' - 9"9 1/2"18' - 8 3/4"9 1/2"DOUBLE SOUND WALL1' - 0"5' - 6"11 1/2"4' - 0"13' - 4"7' - 8"SLOPED BEAM AT TRANSITION OF CEILING 4' - 7"2' - 4"2' - 4" LINE OF EDGE OF FLOOR ABOVE 1' - 4"3' - 6"6' - 9 1/2"3' - 6"1' - 4" 32' - 6"8' - 0 1/2"6' - 0"5' - 8 1/2"9' - 2 1/2"8' - 0"9' - 3 1/2"1' - 4" 7' - 8 1/2"10' - 8"5' - 2" 7' - 9"1' - 8"1' - 7 1/2"7' - 9"2' - 2"WINDOWS OVER MIRROR (7'-0" TO BTM)3 A4.1 2 A4.2 15' - 3 1/2"9' - 2 1/2"15' - 10 1/2"18' - 3 1/2"2' - 4"6' - 7 1/2"1' - 1 1/2"14' - 11" 2 3/4" 14' - 8 1/4" ELEV Rocky MTN elev product SRH-3SPV car=54x40 PROVIDE JACK FOR OUTSIDE TV PROVIDE STUB OUT OF FUTURE OUTDOOR GAS HEATERS TO HANG FORM CEILING RAIL12' - 6"23' - 0" PROVIDE NICHE FOR FUTURE OUTDOOR REF.970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION2/26/2020 11:34:43 AMA2.1MAIN LEVEL PLAN1751Wildridge Point -Lot 3PLANNING AND ZONING SET02-18-20Custom Residence5091 Wildridge Road EastAvon, Colorado 81620True North Project North No.DescriptionDate1/4" = 1'-0"1 A2.0 MAIN LEVEL Attachment A 475.3'79.6'8477.4'N44°09'05"WBUILDING SETBAC A C R E S 09 1 W I L D R I D G E D E A S T S L O P E M A I N T E N A N C E , S N O W S T O R A G E & D R A I N A G E E A S E M E N T (R .N . 2 2 6 4 3 1 ) 8 4 7 2 '-9 " 7'-6" 7'-6"10'-0"DN DN BEAVER CREEKBACHELOR GULCHS A W A T C H R A N G E 62 60 70 68 62 73 51 METER CLOSET 25' - 0"70 MUD ROOM 1 A4.1 ENTRY OVERLOOK ELEV Rocky MTN elev product SRH-3SPV car=54x4012' - 0"1 A4.2 6' - 6"2 A4.0 26' - 11" 73 7' - 6" atv 10' - 2"bench & cubbies4' - 6" 2 A4.1 1 A4.0 4 A4.0 3 A4.0 3 A4.1 2 A4.2 low rise garage door track14' - 10"RAILFP flue 7' - 8"13' - 4"4' - 0"2' - 6"970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION2/26/2020 11:34:50 AMA2.2UPPER LEVEL PLAN1751Wildridge Point -Lot 3PLANNING AND ZONING SET02-18-20Custom Residence5091 Wildridge Road EastAvon, Colorado 81620No.DescriptionDateTrue North Project North Attachment A N44°09'05"WBUILDING SETBACKOT 3 9 A C R E S D G E S L O P E M A I N T E N A N C E , S N O W S T O R A G E & E A S E M E N T 8 4 7 2 '-9 " 7'-6"10'-0"N44°09'05"WBUILDING SETBACKOT 3 9 A C R E S D G E S L O P E M A I N T E N A N C E , S N O W S T O R A G E & E A S E M E N T 8 4 7 3 '-0 " 8 4 7 3 '-0 " 8 4 7 2 '-9 " 8 4 7 3 '-6 " 7'-6"10'-0"natural grade: 8441'-0" Eave height: 33'-0 3/16" natural grade: 8450'-3" Eave height: 29'-4 3/4" natural grade: 8465'-0" Eave height: 7'-0" natural grade: 8453'-0" Ridge height: 26'-4 1/16" natural grade: 8441'-3" Eave height: 30'-10 1/2" natural grade: 8448'-3" Eave height:33'-10 3/4" 8460' 8464' 8466' 8468' 8462' 8454' 8456' 8452' 8458' 8440' 1 A4.1 1 A4.2 1 A4.2 8482' - 1 3/4" 2 A4.0 1.75:12 8486' - 1 11/16" 8483' - 3 3/4" 2 A4.1 1 A4.0 8471' - 10 3/8" 8473' - 6 3/16"8473' - 6 3/16" 8478' - 11 9/16" 8464' 8466' 8450' 8460' 8462' 8458' 8456' 8454' 8452' 8480' - 5 1/8" natural grade: 8453'-11" Ridge height: 34'-8 3/8" 8488' - 7 9/16" 8486' - 1" natural grade: 8451'-2" Ridge height: 34'-11" 4 A4.0 natural grade: 8447'-4" max Eave height: 8482'-4" Eave hieght: 34'=9 3/4" 8482' - 1 3/4" natural grade: 8454'-11" Ridge height: 31'-2 11/16" natural grade: 8464'-6" Eave height:18'-5 5/8" 8482' - 5 3/8" 8460' 8464' 8466' 8462' 8454' 8456' 8458' 8452' 8442' 8444' 8446' 8448' 3 A4.0 3 A4.1 3 A4.1 natural grade: 8453'-3" Eave height: 33'-5 1/2"4:124:124:124:124:122 A4.2 8479' - 7 3/4" 1.75:124:124:12970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION2/26/2020 11:34:51 AMA2.3ROOF PLAN1751Wildridge Point -Lot 3PLANNING AND ZONING SET02-18-20Custom Residence5091 Wildridge Road EastAvon, Colorado 81620No.DescriptionDate1/4" = 1'-0"1 ROOF PLAN True North Project North Attachment A A2.0 MAIN LEVEL 8461' -6" A3.0 UPPER LEVEL 8473' -0" Plate Height 8481' -6" A2.6 ENTRY LEVEL 8471' -6"8' - 6"11' - 6"GRADE AT BUILDING 2 A4.0 2 A4.1 1 A4.0 4 A4.0 3 A4.0 VERTICAL STONE SIDING AT SHED ROOF FORM 2X8" SHIP-LAPPED WOOD SIDING CEMENT STUCCO SYSTEM WITH LIGHT TEXTURE STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING ON FULL COVERAGE HIGH TEMP. WATERPROOF MEMBRANE ON ROOF FRAMING, TYPICAL AT ALL SHED ROOF ELEMENTS ALL 4:12 PITCH ROOFS ARE TO RECIEVE HD ASPHALT SHINGLES ON FULL COVERAGE WATERPROOF MEMBRANE ON ROOF SHEATHING ON ROOF FRAMING ADDRESS NUMBERS TIMBER PURLINS UNDER ENTRY ROOF CEMENT STUCCO SYSTEM WITH LIGHT TEXTURE ALUMINIUM FASCIA, MATCHING ROOF COLOR LARGE STONE/PORC. TILES ON WALL AND COLUMN BASES ALUM. GARAGE DOOR WITH VERTICAL ARRAY OF WINDOWS WIDE FLANGE STEEL COLUMNS VERTICAL STONE SIDING STEEL GUARD RAIL 42" METAL FLASHING BAND GAS METER MOUNTED ON RET. WALL 8460' - 0" 8463' - 0" EXISTING GRADE 8463' - 0"970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION2/26/2020 11:35:01 AMA3.0EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS1751Wildridge Point -Lot 3PLANNING AND ZONING SET02-18-20Custom Residence5091 Wildridge Road EastAvon, Colorado 81620No.DescriptionDate1/4" = 1'-0"1 NORTH ELEVATION 5 3D View 3 2 3D View 1 3 3D View 2 GRADE OTHER THAN THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING MATCHES EXISTING GRADE GRADE OTHER THAN THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING MATCHES EXISTING GRADE Attachment A A2.0 MAIN LEVEL 8461' -6" A3.0 UPPER LEVEL 8473' -0" A1.0 LOWER LEVEL 8451' -0" A2.6 ENTRY LEVEL 8471' -6" 3 A4.1 2 A4.2 GRADE OTHER THAN THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING MATCHES EXISTING GRADE A2.0 MAIN LEVEL 8461' -6" A3.0 UPPER LEVEL 8473' -0" A1.0 LOWER LEVEL 8451' -0"10' - 6"A2.6 ENTRY LEVEL 8471' -6"10' - 6"10' - 0"1' - 6"11' - 6"11' - 6"CEILING HEIGHT10' - 0"2 A4.0 2 A4.1 1 A4.0 4 A4.0 3 A4.0 17' - 0 1/8" 17' - 0"4:124:121.75:12 4:124:12VERTICAL WOOD SIDING AT SHED ROOF FORM 2X8" SHIP-LAPPED WOOD SIDING VERTICAL WOOD SIDING AT LIVING AND FAMLIY ROOM FORMS CEMENT STUCCO SYSTEM WITH LIGHT TEXTURE CEMENT STUCCO SYSTEM WITH LIGHT TEXTURE WOOD BELLY BAND STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING ON FULL COVERAGE HIGH TEMP. WATERPROOF MEMBRANE ON ROOF FRAMING, TYPICAL AT ALL SHED ROOF ELEMENTS ALL 4:12 PITCH ROOFS ARE TO RECIEVE HD ASPHALT SHINGLES ON FULL COVERAGE WATERPROOF MEMBRANE ON ROOF SHEATHING ON ROOF FRAMING STEEL RAILING (36" TALL, WITH < 4" SPACING ON HORIZONTAL PICKETS STEEL WIDE FLANGE COLUMNS WITH TIMBER OR GLU-LAM BEAMS ALL EXPOSED TO VIEW CONCRETE FOUNDATION IS TO BE CLAD WITH STUCCO FINISH CONCRETE FOUNDATIONS AT COLUMN BASES GRADE OTHER THAN THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING MATCHES EXISTING GRADE A2.0 MAIN LEVEL 8461' -6" A3.0 UPPER LEVEL 8473' -0" Plate Height 8481' -6" A1.0 LOWER LEVEL 8451' -0" A2.6 ENTRY LEVEL 8471' -6" 3 A4.1 2 A4.2 970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION2/26/2020 11:35:08 AMA3.1EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS1751Wildridge Point -Lot 3PLANNING AND ZONING SET02-18-20Custom Residence5091 Wildridge Road EastAvon, Colorado 81620No.DescriptionDate1/4" = 1'-0"2 EAST ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0"1 SOUTH ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0"3 WEST ELEVATION Attachment A A2.0 MAIN LEVEL 8461' -6" A3.0 UPPER LEVEL 8473' -0" Plate Height 8481' -6" A1.0 LOWER LEVEL 8451' -0" 1 A4.2 3 A4.1 2 A4.2 A2.0 MAIN LEVEL 8461' -6" A3.0 UPPER LEVEL 8473' -0" Plate Height 8481' -6" A1.0 LOWER LEVEL 8451' -0" 1 A4.2 8472' - 0"10' - 6"17' - 0"4' - 7" 3 A4.1 2 A4.2 A2.0 MAIN LEVEL 8461' -6" A3.0 UPPER LEVEL 8473' -0" Plate Height 8481' -6" A1.0 LOWER LEVEL 8451' -0" 1 A4.2 3 A4.1 2 A4.2 R @ 7 1/4"19 R @ 7"18 A2.0 MAIN LEVEL 8461' -6" A3.0 UPPER LEVEL 8473' -0" Plate Height 8481' -6" A1.0 LOWER LEVEL 8451' -0" 1 A4.2 3 A4.1 2 A4.2 8' - 6"970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION2/26/2020 11:35:09 AMA4.0BUILDING SECTIONS1751Wildridge Point -Lot 3PLANNING AND ZONING SET02-18-20Custom Residence5091 Wildridge Road EastAvon, Colorado 81620No.DescriptionDate1/4" = 1'-0"1 Section 8 1/4" = 1'-0"2 Section 4 1/4" = 1'-0"3 Section 11 1/4" = 1'-0"4 Section 9 Attachment A A2.0 MAIN LEVEL 8461' -6" A3.0 UPPER LEVEL 8473' -0" Plate Height 8481' -6" A1.0 LOWER LEVEL 8451' -0" 1 A4.2 10' - 6"8' - 6"9' - 9 7/8"1' - 8 1/8"9' - 5 3/8"4 :1 2 8' - 6"22' - 6"1' - 0 7/8"3 A4.1 2 A4.2 A2.0 MAIN LEVEL 8461' -6" A3.0 UPPER LEVEL 8473' -0" Plate Height 8481' -6" A1.0 LOWER LEVEL 8451' -0" 1 A4.2 3 A4.1 2 A4.2 A2.0 MAIN LEVEL 8461' -6" A3.0 UPPER LEVEL 8473' -0" Plate Height 8481' -6" A1.0 LOWER LEVEL 8451' -0" 1 A4.1 2 A4.0 2 A4.1 1 A4.0 4 A4.0 3 A4.0 TRUSS 970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION2/26/2020 11:35:11 AMA4.1BUILDING SECTIONS1751Wildridge Point -Lot 3PLANNING AND ZONING SET02-18-20Custom Residence5091 Wildridge Road EastAvon, Colorado 81620No.DescriptionDate1/4" = 1'-0"1 Section 2 1/4" = 1'-0"2 Section 7 1/4" = 1'-0"3 Section 6 Attachment A A2.0 MAIN LEVEL 8461' -6" A3.0 UPPER LEVEL 8473' -0" Plate Height 8481' -6" A1.0 LOWER LEVEL 8451' -0" 1 A4.1 2 A4.0 7"2 A4.1 1 A4.0 4 A4.0 3 A4.0 40' - 5 1/2" A2.0 MAIN LEVEL 8461' -6" A3.0 UPPER LEVEL 8473' -0" Plate Height 8481' -6" A1.0 LOWER LEVEL 8451' -0" 1 A4.1 2 A4.0 2 A4.1 1 A4.0 4 A4.0 3 A4.0 970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION2/26/2020 11:35:13 AMA4.2BUILDING SECTIONS1751Wildridge Point -Lot 3PLANNING AND ZONING SET02-18-20Custom Residence5091 Wildridge Road EastAvon, Colorado 81620No.DescriptionDate1/4" = 1'-0"1 Section 3 1/4" = 1'-0"2 Section 12 Attachment A Date: 2-18-20 Meeting at TOA RE: Planning and Zoning review meeting The lot 3, of the Wildridge Point subdivision within Wildridge subdivision, also known as 5091 Wildridge Road East, is being developed with a single family residence. This subdivision is comprised of 3 single family lots. Lot 3 is .809 acres or 27,959 s.f. and is steeply sloped downward off of Wildridge Road. The Plat was created for the Wildridge Point area and the following plat restrictions were recorded for Lot 3. 1 The building footprint will be limited to 2500 s.f. Footprint , also called ground level footprint , means the outline of the total area which is covered by a building's perimeter at ground level. (from TOA Dev. Code) 2 There is a non-developable area on the south side of the 30’ wide utility easement. The home is proposed as a mountain modern design for a 5 bedroom and 5 bath (+ 2 powder rooms) and a 2 car garage. We have been studying this lot and the workable designs possible on this steeply sloped downward sloped lot for the last 4+ years. We have found that the best designs are derived from the design direction to place the house onto the existing contours ‘lightly’ and maintain the existing slope as much as possible, rather than trying to force flat areas or adding extensive retaining walls to bench the house. As soon as we embraced this approach, the home worked. The entry and the garage approach are the areas that we use the house to retain. We proposed using decks to break up the downward elevations. This gives outdoor living that enjoys the views and helps create shadows and movement on the homes south elevation. The 5 bedroom, 5 bath residence consisting of 5186.1 s.f. of living area and a 775.1 s.f. garage. The design has the roof planes set to respond to the sloping site, and create interior volumes for circulation down to the homes main level, all while capturing the commanding views. The presented design addresses conflicts with overall height limitations of the building by creating roof forms that reducing the roof pitch. We will be applying and seeking approval for an AEC for the ability to provide the home with all 1.75:12 roof pitches in lieu of the min roof slope of 3:12 called out in the development code for meal roofs. We feel that this lowered roof pitch enhances the design, reduces wasted interior volume, and lowers the height of the building to be able to achieve being below the 35’- 0” ridge height limitation. The majority of the roofs are asphalt shingle clad, 4:12 pitched roof forms. The presented design, with the 1.75:12 shed roof creates a maximum building height of 34’-11”, (below the developable right of 35’-0” maximum building height.) We have also come across that the Landscape Units required for the site are difficult to achieve with the house being so close to the street and the west property easement. Trees within the easements are not counted to the Landscape Units. Plantings beyond revegetating the slope result in minimal return. This landscaping would be hard to see from inside or outside the home due to the steeply sloping site. We will be applying and seeking approval for an AEC for the reduction of Landscape units by 30%. Please note that we have proposed 2 trees and a shrubbery bed within the front easement. WE have heavily landscaped the streetscape of the home. We believe that we have created a handsome home that fits well within the language of the Wildridge neighborhood and fits the design goals of the owners. We are seeking approval at the next P and Z meeting on March 3rd, 2020 for the building design and the AEC. Attachment B ROOF PITCH AEC (d) Review Criteria. The review authority shall use the following review criteria as the basis for a decision on an application for alternative equivalent compliance: (1) The proposed alternative achieves the intent of the subject design or development standard to the same or better degree than the subject standard; The requested AEC for roof pitch of 1.75:12 in lieu of 3:12 for metal roof forms created a lower roof form and responds to the steep slope by making the overall height of the building lower than would be possible by a roof that is Dev. Code compliant. (2) The proposed alternative achieves the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan to the same or better degree than the subject standard; The requested for roof pitch of 1.75:12 in lieu of 3:12 for metal roof achieves the same goals and policies of the Avon Comp. Plan. Roof snow shedding is being directed away from pedestrian and vehicle location. The roof material is warrantied at the lower slopes the same as a steeper roof would be. (3) The proposed alternative results in benefits to the community that are equivalent to or better than compliance with the subject standard; and The requested for roof pitch of 1.75:12 in lieu of 3:12 for metal roof achieves a benefit of a lower ridge point and lower overall roof than a Dev. Code compliant roof would. A simpler single roof pitch can be used instead of multiple steeper compliant roof pitches. (4) The proposed alternative imposes no greater impacts on adjacent properties than would occur through compliance with the specific requirements of this Title. The requested for roof pitch of 1.75:12 in lieu of 3:12 for metal roof imposes no further impact (e) Conditions. The reviewing authority may recommend or impose conditions on an approval for alternative equivalent compliance provided that such conditions are related to ensuring the performance of the alternative equivalent compliance to meet or exceed the subject standard. Such conditions may include performance guarantees, required timeframes or the ability to revoke an approval for alternative equivalent compliance. 30% reduction in Landscape units AEC (d) Review Criteria. The review authority shall use the following review criteria as the basis for a decision on an application for alternative equivalent compliance: (1) The proposed alternative achieves the intent of the subject design or development standard to the same or better degree than the subject standard; The requested AEC for reduction in landscape units achieves the intent. We are proposing landscaping within the easement, and along the front façade of the building in quantities consistent with that which would occur under complaint landscapes. Trees within easements are not counted toward the Landscape units. The steepness of the lot makes any plantings on the sides or on the lower portions of the lot not readily visible from on site or off site. (2) The proposed alternative achieves the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan to the same or better degree than the subject standard; The requested AEC for reduction in landscape units achieves the same goals and policies of the Avon Comp. Plan. The home will appear to have a more manicured look from the street. And the landscape will look appropriate to blend with the surrounding natural environment of the slope side. Plantings are proposed where you can see them. (3) The proposed alternative results in benefits to the community that are equivalent to or better than compliance with the subject standard; and The requested AEC for reduction in landscape units results in a benefit to the community that is equivalent to compliant landscape. Plantings are proposed where you can see them. (4) The proposed alternative imposes no greater impacts on adjacent properties than would occur through compliance with the specific requirements of this Title. The requested AEC for reduction in landscape units imposes no further impact on adjacent properties (e) Conditions. The reviewing authority may recommend or impose conditions on an approval for alternative equivalent compliance provided that such conditions are related to ensuring the performance of the alternative equivalent compliance to meet or exceed the subject standard. Such conditions may include performance guarantees, required timeframes or the ability to revoke an approval for alternative equivalent compliance. Thank you, Jeffrey P Manley AIA Martin Manley Architects 970-328-1299 (direct) Attachment B EMC Sign Work Session - February 28, 2020 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: David McWilliams, AICP, Town Planner RE: SGN20002 Rail Bridge Sign Design Public Hearing DATE: February 27, 2020 SUMMARY: This staff report contains one application for consideration by the PZC: Sign Design for new Embedded Messaging Center (EMC) Light Emitting Diode (LED) signs on the railroad bridge above Avon Road. Staff presented an application on February 4, and the application was denied unanimously by PZC. Upon conducting a work session to determine the policy implications of the new signs, PZC is now instructed to review a new application with a robust policy and application procedure. BACKGROUND: As discussed in Attachment A, these signs are included in the 2020 Capital Improvements Program. The Minor Sign Design application in front of PZC is not required per code to be presented for a decision. However, the Town desires its design review board to have buy-in for this project before moving forward. The review criteria for signs can be found in the original Staff report, Attachment A and PZC should take these more as guidelines than binding code. Southern facing sign location. Northern facing sign location. The only code language governing digital displays, 7.34(e)(8) is cited below: EMC Sign Public Hearing - February 18, 2020 2 (8)Digital Displays, Electronic Message Centers, and electronic changeable copy signs. Auto-oriented electronic messages, images, and/or changeable copy signs are permitted along arterial streets, provided that they meet the following criteria: i. Such signs shall be equipped with automatic dimmers, which shall be programmed to not exceed three tenths (.3) footcandles over ambient light levels. ii. Signs shall not cause distractions to drivers with moving images or similar effects. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Installation and wiring: The conduit will come from near the Christy Sports bus stop and run from behind the façade of the bridge. No wiring will be visible. Frame: The signs have minimally visible black frames made of anodized metal. Per code, (3) Sign Materials. Signs shall use quality materials, including but not limited to natural stone, anodized metal, routed or sandblasted wood, such as rough cedar or redwood; interior-lit, individual Plexiglas-faced letters; or three-dimensional individual letters with or without indirect lighting. REVIEW CRITERIA: The Planning and Zoning Commission is instructed to consider the following items in reviewing proposed designs: 1. Evidence of substantial compliance with the purpose of the Sign Code as specified in Section 7.32(A) Sign Code Purposes; Staff Response: The application strikes a balance for criterium (4): “Promote high quality and weather resistant signs that are properly maintained over time and renovated when necessary.” Taken in context as a replacement for temporary signs, the proposal saves time, labor and materials over the long run, and is safer. PZC should carefully weigh if the proposal meets (7): “Provide a reasonable balance between the right of an individual to identify a business or express a message, and the right of the public to be protected against the visual discord resulting from the unrestricted proliferation of signs and similar devices.” Staff has done its best to deliver a set of rules that minimizes the risk of visual clutter and PZC is encouraged to discuss with Staff if the proposal meets these purposes. 2. The suitability of the improvement, including materials with which the sign is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located; Staff Response: The material choice of the sign are stock choices meant to protect the display with an iron frame, a material is encouraged by code. 3. The nature of adjacent and neighboring improvements; Staff Response: Neighboring buildings include the Burger King, Christy Sports, and the White River Center. The sign types are diverse but generally present a unified design of auto-centric internally illuminated signs. 4. The quality of the materials to be utilized in any proposed improvement; EMC Sign Public Hearing - February 18, 2020 3 Staff Response: Staff anticipates a more uniform aesthetic with the LED panel compared to an array of banner types. 5. The visual impact of any proposed improvement, as viewed from any adjacent or neighboring property; Staff Response: The visual impact should be carefully assessed by PZC. 6. The objective that no improvement will be so similar or dissimilar to other signs in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic, will be impaired; Staff Response: Staff anticipates a Code Text Amendment that would disallow digital displays for non- governmental purposes. 7. Whether the type, height, size and/or quantity of signs generally complies with the sign code or sign program, and are appropriate for the project; Staff Response: The application allows for individuality while maintaining consistency of size and location. 8. Whether the sign is primarily oriented to vehicular or pedestrian traffic, and whether the sign is appropriate for the determined orientation. Staff Response: PZC should carefully weigh if the LED application is appropriate for this location. CODE AMENDMENT: As noted during the work session, Staff is requesting PZC to recommend wording changes to the sign code that address eliminating the digital sign type for private property owners. The Town does not want to allow the business community to change the character of Town through their proliferation. With any code amendment, Staff would still apply to PZC for sign design approval of any new governmental digital sign. Below is proposed language, with red underline indicating language to be added. A suggested condition of the application is a request for Town Council to initiate a Code Text Amendment application. (8)Digital Displays, Electronic Message Centers, and electronic changeable copy signs. Auto-oriented electronic messages, images, and/or changeable copy signs are permitted, for government use only, along arterial streets, provided that they meet the following criteria: i. Such signs shall be equipped with automatic dimmers, which shall be programmed to not exceed three tenths (.3) footcandles over ambient light levels. ii. Signs shall not cause distractions to drivers with moving images or similar effects. iii. Such signs are subject to a Minor Sign Application and public hearing with PZC. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approving Case #SGN20001 with the following findings and conditions: Findings: 1. The application is complete; 2. The application provides sufficient information to allow the PZC to determine that the application complies with the relevant review criteria; 3. The application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.160(f), Sign Plan. The application meets the sign standards established in the Avon Development Code; EMC Sign Public Hearing - February 18, 2020 4 4. The application complies with the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan; 5. No extra demand for public services is made by the application; 6. The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community; 7. The application allows individuality and promotes the expectation of attractive sign appearance; and 8. Compliance with the policies and application criteria ensure sensitive use of the signs. Conditions: 1. Any sign use that is less strict than the policies and application criteria defined in Attachment 2 requires review by PZC; and 2. Town Council should consider a code text amendment limiting the use of digital signs. RECOMMENDED MOTION: “I move to Approve Case #SGN20001, a Sign Design application for the railroad bridge over Avon Road with the findings and conditions as recommended by staff. ATTACHMENTS: A. Materials from February 4, 2020 Land use application B. Sign Application and Policy Sheet Thank you, David McWilliams 970-749-4023 cmcwilliams@avon.org February 4, 2020 PZC Meeting – Railroad Bridge Sign Staff Report – Sign Design - Public Hearing February 4, 2020 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Project Name: SGN20001 Zoning: Right of Way Address: Rail Bridge Over Avon Road Location: Prepared By: Benchmark at Beaver Creek David McWilliams, Town Planer Staff Report Overview This staff report contains one application for consideration by the PZC: Sign Design for new Embedded Messaging Center (EMC) Light Emitting Diode (LED) signs on the railroad bridge above Avon Road. Summary of Request The Town of Avon is proposing to place new EMC signs in the location where event signs are currently located from time to time. The current signs are located to face oncoming traffic from above. The new signs (Attachment A) are approximately as large as the current banners are allowed to be. Current application criteria for the banners require a non-profit sponsor, allow signs for a maximum of one (1) week, from Monday to Sunday, with a $150 fee to be displayed on each side of the bridge. Further, no hand-drawn words (copy) are permitted, and sponsor names and logos may cover no more than twenty percent (20%) of the total banner space. There is no proposed limit to hours or brightness for the new signs. Avon Municipal Code requires, “Such signs shall be equipped with automatic dimmers, which shall be programmed to not exceed three tenths (.3) footcandles over ambient light levels.” A footcandle is the illuminance of one lumen on a one-square foot surface with a uniform distribution. A standard 40-watt lightbulb produces puts out 450 lumens. This is a standard adopted by several states and municipalities. The time limit is proposed to change to be more flexible. For example, the board could read “Avon LIVE! tonight” on Wednesdays and “Rodeo tonight” on Thursdays during the summer, instead of having the weeklong time frame. Signs are not proposed to run simultaneously, and only one message will be allowed at a time. Southern facing sign location. ATTACHMENT A February 4, 2020 PZC Meeting – Railroad Bridge Sign Northern facing sign location. Review Criteria The Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing proposed designs: 1. Evidence of substantial compliance with the purpose of the Sign Code as specified in Section 7.32(A) Sign Code Purposes; Staff Response: The application strikes a balance for criterium (4): “Promote high quality and weather resistant signs that are properly maintained over time and renovated when necessary.” Taken in context as a replacement for temporary signs, the proposal saves time, labor and materials over the long run, and is safer. PZC should carefully weigh if the proposal meets (7): “Provide a reasonable balance between the right of an individual to identify a business or express a message, and the right of the public to be protected against the visual discord resulting from the unrestricted proliferation of signs and similar devices.” Additional illuminated signs in this location may be viewed as visual clutter and PZC is instructed to carefully determine if the proposal meets these purposes. 2. The suitability of the improvement, including materials with which the sign is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located; Staff Response: The material choice of the sign are stock choices meant to protect the display with an iron frame. Planning staff is not aware where power will be drawn from or what the conduit will look like. 3. The nature of adjacent and neighboring improvements; Staff Response: Neighboring buildings include the Burger King, Christy Sports, and the White River Center. The sign types are diverse but generally present a unified design of auto-centric internally illuminated signs. 4. The quality of the materials to be utilized in any proposed improvement; Staff Response: Staff anticipates a more uniform aesthetic with the LED panel compared to an array of banner types. 5. The visual impact of any proposed improvement, as viewed from any adjacent or neighboring property; Staff Response: The visual impact should be carefully assessed by PZC. 6. The objective that no improvement will be so similar or dissimilar to other signs in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic, will be impaired; ATTACHMENT A February 4, 2020 PZC Meeting – Railroad Bridge Sign Staff Response: Not applicable. 7. Whether the type, height, size and/or quantity of signs generally complies with the sign code or sign program, and are appropriate for the project; Staff Response: The application allows for individuality while maintaining consistency of size and location. 8. Whether the sign is primarily oriented to vehicular or pedestrian traffic, and whether the sign is appropriate for the determined orientation. Staff Response: PZC should carefully weigh if the LED application is appropriate for this location. Staff Recommendation for Case #SGN20001 Staff recommends approving Case #SGN20001 with the following findings and condition: Findings: 1. The application is complete; 2. The application provides sufficient information to allow the PZC to determine that the application complies with the relevant review criteria; 3. The application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.160(f), Sign Plan. The application meets the sign standards established in the Avon Development Code; 4. The application complies with the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan; 5. No extra demand for public services is made by the application; 6. The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community; and 7. The application allows individuality and promotes the expectation of attractive sign appearance. Condition: 1. The signs shall have automatic dimmers programmed to not exceed three tenths (.3) footcandles over ambient light levels. Recommended Motion: “I move to Approve Case #SGN20001, a Sign Design application for the railroad bridge over Avon Road with the finding and condition as recommended by staff. Attachment A. Sign Design (Proposed) B. Application Memo From Town Manager ATTACHMENT A ART SUPERIMPOSED ON PHOTO, SHOWN AT APPROXIMATE RELATIVE SIZE FREEMAN SIGNS IS A UL LISTED SIGN MANUFACTURER NEW S/F 10 MM FULL COLOR EMC SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" QUANTITY: 1 EA PER SIDE (2 TOTAL), MANUFACTURE AND INSTALLA OF 1 TOWN OF AVON 100 Mikala Way. AVON, CO.BENZIE MBENZIE@FREEMANSIGNS.NET 19-568 12/26/2019 1 7/15/19 -CHANGED COLOR OF FACES AND CABINET X X X X X X & ELECTRIC 13'-6 1/2"13'-6 1/2"3'-1 1/2"4’-0” (+/-)CONCRETE V.O.7" 2" New S/F 10mm full color Freeman Digital EMC 416x96 matrix, 2” angle iron frame attached to existing concrete over pass, painted black. SIDE VIEW 1 1 Attachment AATTACHMENT A 970.748.4004 eric@avon.org TO: Avon Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Eric Heil, Town Manager RE: Bridge Signs – Avon Road DATE: January 31, 2020 SUMMARY: This report provides additional information for the Town’s application to erect event information signs on the Union Pacific Railroad Bridge (“Bridge”) on Avon Road. Avon installs event banners on the Bridge each year to announce and advertise events in Avon and Beaver Creek, including the Vilar Performance Center. The process to install banners requires four public works crew members, the use of the bucket truck and the closure of one lane of Avon road. The process requires approximately two hours or the equivalent of a full public works labor day. We estimate that 15 to 20 banners are currently installed throughout the calendar year. Each banner costs approximately $120 to $150 and typically goes to the County landfill after use. The electronic sign will have a wireless connection and can be programmed remotely. Avon has more events planned for the 2020 calendar year compared to 2019 and will likely have additional events in 2021. Between music, arts and cultural events, Avon plans to produce or host over 30 events in the 2020 summer season. In addition, Avon seeks to increase partnership relationships with Beaver Creek, including the advertisement of the Beaver Creek Rodeo in Avon, Beaver Creek events such as Brews and BBQ, events at the Vilar, and Birds of Prey. Announcement and advertisement of Beaver Creek events will likely add up an additional 30 event postings throughout the year. The installation of an electronic sign will allow Avon to easily and conveniently to post event announcements and advertisements throughout the year. The proposed high-resolution sign is intended to allow posting of event signs in an attractive manner that utilizes full color art work similar to the current banners. The use of the event sign is planned and intended to post only static signs, meaning multiple message postings that rotate are not intended. An example of rotating messages is the Town of Dillon electronic sign that has three screens that rotate every four seconds. No commercial advertising is planned for the Bridge signs other than special events open to the general public in Avon and Beaver Creek. The intent is to use the Bridge signs exclusively for announcements of public special events, occasional public messages (such as wildfire mitigation in spring), and for emergency announcements if needed. The location and use of the Bridge signs were also selected for consideration to traffic safety and aesthetic concerns. The Bridge banners are located on a stretch of Avon road without intersections or pedestrian crossings. As stated above, the intent is to post static signs that are similar to the banners but allow for changing as often as appropriate to announce events that day or the next upcoming event. We are also revisiting all signage on Avon Road with consideration towards not distracting drivers or creating sign clutter (or better yet, reduce existing sign clutter). The Avon Town Council included the proposed electronic Bridge signs in the adopted 2020 Budget and Capital Improvements Plan with the intent to facilitate special event announcements and community engagement. The Bridge signs are expected to allow at least 60 event announcements in 2020, which represents the equivalent of 60 total public works labor days and an equivalent cost of $7,200 per year. Thank you, Eric Attachment BATTACHMENT A Attachment B RAILROAD BRIDGE BANNER APPLICATION Town of Avon, Colorado 100 Mikaela Way, PO Box 975, Avon, CO 81620 P: (970) 748-4065 Email: ddempsey@avon.org Banner Policy G ENERAL INFORMATION AND REQUIREMENTS LED BANNERs SHALL REPRESENT COMMUNITY EVENTS OR SHALL BE SPONSORED BY A NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION (NPO). THIS TOWN SERVICE IS INTENDED FOR NON-COMMERCIAL ADVERTISEMENT OF EVENTS IN AVON AND BEAVER CREEK. LED BANNER ARE ONLY PERMITTED FOR A MAXIMUM OF TEN (10) DAYS AND A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) FULL DAY. NUMBER OF BANNERS AND PLACEMENT ARE BASED UPON AVAILABILITY AND AT THE DISCRETION OF THE TOWN STAFF. APPLICATION FEE IS $150.00 FOR A WEEK AND PRORATED BASED ON THE NUMBER OF DAYS THE SIGN WILL BE DISPLAYED. THE MINIMUM FEE IS $50 FOR REVIEW. REQUIREMENTS: WHITE OR OFF-WHITE COLORS ARE ONLY ALLOWED ON 20% OF THE SIGN AREA TO REDUCE GLARE ONLY FLAT TEXT IS PERMITTED (NO 3D LETTERS) USING ONLY ONE LETTER STYLE IN A SINGLE SIGN DESIGN IS PREFERRED UPPER-CASE ONLY SCRIPT IS PROHIBITED ONLY USE HIGH RESOLUTION GRAPHICS / IMAGES USE HIGH CONTRAST COLORS LIKE DARK GREEN OR YELLOW. IF YOU NEED TO USE COMPLIMENTARY COLORS, MAKE SURE TO ADD A CONTRASTING THIRD COLOR TO BRING DEFINITION. OVERCROWDED SIGNS WITH TOO MANY VISUALS, TEXTS, OR WORDS ARE NOT PERMITTED EVENT INFORMATION NAME OF EVENT: DATES FOR BANNER DISPLAY: NAME OF BUSINESS/ORGANIZATION: NAME OF APPLICANT: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE / EMAIL: SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT: DATE: SIGN BEST PRACTICES SIMPLICITY, CREATIVITY AND FRESHNESS ARE THE FUNDAMENTAL FOR CREATING LED DESIGN CONTENT USE SHORT, MEANINGFUL AND POWERFUL WORDS AND COPY FOR FASTER COMPREHENSION USE SANS-SERIF FONTS (I.E. VERDANA OR TAHOMA) ALTERNATIVELY, BOLD TEXT INTERFACES (IE. ARIAL BLACK AND IMPACT) IS EFFECTIVE TO BRING THE TEXT OUT OF THE BACKGROUND FILL AT LEAST 1/4 OF THE SCREEN WITH LARGE TEXT MAKE THE LETTERS BIG! SOME BEST COLOR MATCHES ARE: BLACK ON YELLOW, BLACK ON WHITE, YELLOW ON BLACK, YELLOW ON BLUE, WHITE ON BLUE, WHITE ON GREEN AND GREEN ON WHITE ADD BORDER TO BRING FOCUS DIRECTLY TO THE CENTER OF THE SIGN TRY TO FOLLOW THESE RULES: o LESS IS MORE o WHAT DOES THE AUDIENCE NEED TO KNOW? o ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS: WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE o AVOID DATE AND TIME CONFUSION STAFF APPROVALS FESTIVALS & SPECIAL EVENTS: DATE: COMMUNICATIONS MANAGER: DATE: Attachment B • Signs will be only be activated during daylight hours +1 but may operate at least until 7 pm and no later than 9 pm • Foot Candles emitted shall not exceed three tenths (.3) footcandles over ambient light levels. This level may be adjusted down after dark • Both LED panels will have the same graphic, except if emergency signs need to be different. • The LED panels will go completely dormant between programmed signs and at night • Only one slide is allowed per day and only stationary slides without any animations are allowed • Emergency signs – AASHTO and CDOT (road engineering) standards will dictate the display of signs during emergency. Orange block letters shall be used. AVON PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES TUESDAY FEBRUARY 18, 2020 AVON TOWN HALL, 100 MIKAELA WAY, AVON, CO February 18, 2020 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 1 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL Chairperson Lindsay Hardy called the regular meeting to order at 5:08 p.m. A roll call was taken, and Planning Commission members present were Rebecca Smith, Marty Golembiewski, Jared Barnes, Steve Nusbaum, and Alex Dammeyer. Also present were Town Planner David McWilliams, Planning Director Matt Pielsticker, and Town Manager Eric Heil. 2. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST No conflicts of interest were disclosed. 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Commissioner Barnes moved to approve the agenda. Commissioner Smith seconded the motion and the motion passed unanimously 6-0. 4. BUSINESS ITEMS 4.1 LED SIGN POLICY – AVON ROAD RAILROAD BRIDGE – WORK SESSION Commissioners discussed finer points of a new proposed sign. Staff agreed to come back the next meeting with the finalized policy for more discussion and a recommendation to Town Council. 4.2 CONSENT AGENDA 4.2.1 Approval of minutes from February 4, 2020 PZC meeting 4.2.2 Record of decision from LCE20001, ERWSD expansion 4.2.3 Record of decision from sgn20001, Avon road railroad bridge sign 5. OTHER BUSINESS Eric Heil discussed updates with the Town including special events, and future planning initiatives. 6. ADJOURN There being no further business before the Commission, Commissioner Barnes moved to adjourn the meeting. The time was 6:35 p.m. These meeting minutes are only a summary of the proceedings of the meeting. They are not intended to be comprehensive or to include each statement, person speaking or to portray with complete accuracy. The most accurate records of the meeting are the audio of the meeting, which is housed in the Town Clerk' s office. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED: David McWilliams, Town Planner APPROVED: Lindsay Hardy, Chairperson __________________________________