Loading...
L16 B2 WR conceptTown of Avon Concept Design Staff Report July 6, 1999 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date December 20, 2019  Project type Grading Modification for future duplex  Legal description Lot 16, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision  Zoning PUD-Duplex  Address 2690 June Creek Trail  Introduction George Plavec has applied to move 1,200 yards of fill dirt onto Lot 16. He owns the lot and intends to develop it in fall of 1999. He has submitted a concept plan for the duplex structure. The site is located on a flag lot, taking access from June Creek Trail. Design Review Considerations The Commission’s Procedures, Rules & Regulations, Section 6.10, provide the framework for evaluation of this project. Additional guidelines and regulations are contained within (but not limited to) the Comprehensive Plan, the Design Guidelines, the Zoning Ordinance and the Subdivision Regulations. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other provisions of the Zoning Code. The conformance with other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. The type and quality of materials of which the structure is to be constructed. The design of site grading and drainage to minimize impacts to adjacent sites, rights-of-way and easements. The compatibility of proposed improvements with site topography, to minimize site disturbance, orient with slope, step building with slope, and minimize benching or other significant alteration of existing topography. The appearance of proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways, with respect to architectural style, massing, height, orientation to street, quality of materials, and colors. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. Staff Comments Based upon our initial review of the project’s basic concepts, staff has the following comments. They are not intended to constitute a complete project report. Staff will conduct a complete review and provided a full analysis with the Final Design staff report. Use: In staff’s opinion, the use of a vacant lot to accept fill dirt is not appropriate until a building permit has been issued. Although surety can be posted against damage to the lot, it would be impossible to restore the area to the pre-existing condition. Yard, bulk and density: n/a Site grading, access, and maneuverability: in staff’s opinion, the proposed concept plan results in disturbance of a very large portion of the lot. The design results in a great modification to the natural topography. This is in conflict with Design Criterion 6. General architectural design: n/a Context: n/a Additional Comments: staff recommends that “dirt deals” should be allowed only when a final design for the property has been approved and at least a grading permit is issued for the property. If you have any questions regarding this project or any other planning matter, please call me at 748-4030, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, Karen Griffith, AICP Town Planner