PZC Packet 0521191 Agenda posted on Friday, May 16, 2019 at the following public places within the Town of Avon:
-Avon Municipal Building, Avon Recreation Center, Avon Public Library, Town of Avon Website www.avon.org
Please call 970-748-4023 for questions.
Planning & Zoning Commission
Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, May 21, 2019
100 Mikaela Way – Avon Municipal Building
If you require special accommodation, please contact us in advance and we will assist you. You may call David McWilliams at 970-
748-4023 or email cmcwilliams@avon.org for special requests.
I. Call to Order – 5:00pm
II. Swearing in of Jared Barnes, Lindsay Hardy, and Steve Nusbaum (Town Clerk Brenda Torres)
III. Roll Call
IV. Appointment of Chairperson and Vise-Chairperson
Summary: Pursuant to the PZC Rules of Procedure, PZC shall select its chairperson and vice
chairperson on a yearly basis immediately after the appointment of new members.
Staff will also ask that PZC re-affirm Lindsay Hardy’s role as Village at Avon DRB
representative.
V. Additions & Amendments to the Agenda
VI. Conflicts of Interest
VII. Fence Alternative Design & Minor Development Plan – PUBLIC HEARING
File: MNR19004 & AEC19003
Applicant/Owner: Sean Reynolds
Property: Lot 51B, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision / 2646B Beartrap Road
Summary: Proposed fence with mesh wiring. The application requires an AEC because fences in
Wildridge are only allowed to be made of wood per code.
VIII. Project Referral for Avon Apartments
Applicant: Richard Graves
Property: Planning Area F / Lot 1, Village (at Avon) Subdivision / 1000 E. Beaver Creek Blvd
Owners: Traer Creek RP-LLC
Summary: Pursuant to the Village (at Avon) PUD Guide, design projects are to be referred, for
comment only, to the Avon Planning and Zoning Commission. Comments will be
provided to the Village (at Avon) Design Review Board for consideration in their final
review of the project.
IX. Consent Agenda
A – PZC Meeting Minutes – April 9, 2019
B – Record of Decision – Benchmark Road Parking
C – Record of Decision – Lot 7 Riverfront & Tract H Benchmark at Beaver Creek Connector Path
X. Adjourn
1 PZC Minutes April 2, 2019
Planning & Zoning Commission
Meeting Minutes
Tuesday, April 2, 2019
I. Call to Order – The meeting was called to order at 5:00pm.
II. Roll Call – All Commissioners were present.
III. Additions & Amendments to the Agenda - There were no additions or amendments.
IV. Conflicts of Interest – There were no conflicts disclosed.
V. Minor Development Plan – Benchmark Road – PUBLIC HEARING
File: MNR19003
Applicant: Town of Avon
Property: Right of Way on the south side of Benchmark Road
Owner: Town of Avon
Summary: Addition of parking along Benchmark Road, including drainage and landscaping
improvements.
Action: Commissioner Glaner motioned to approve the item with the findings listed below:
1. The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.080(f), Development Plan,
§7.16.090(f), Design Review. The design meets the development and design
standards established in the Avon Development Code.
2. The development application is complete;
3. The development application provides sufficient information to allow the PZC to
determine that the development application complies with the relevant review
criteria;
4. The development application complies with the goals and policies of the Avon
Comprehensive Plan;
5. The demand for public services or infrastructure is met by the development
application; and
6. The development relates to the character of the surrounding community.
Commissioner Golembiewski seconded the motion and it carried 7-0.
VI. Minor Development Plan – 368 Riverfront Lane - PUBLIC HEARING
File: MNR19001
Applicant: Town of Avon
Property: Lot 7 Riverfront and Tract H Block 2 Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Owners: CRP/EWP Riverfront Avon Owner II, LLC; Eagle River Water & Sanitation District
Summary: Recreation path connecting Riverfront Lane and the Eagle Valley Trail.
Action: Commissioner Golembiewski motioned to approve the item with the following
findings and conditions:
Findings:
1. The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.080(f), Development Plan,
§7.16.090(f), Design Review.
2. The design meets the development and design standards established in the Avon
Development Code, including §7.32.040, Paved Trail Design.
DRAFT
2 PZC Minutes April 2, 2019
3. The development application is complete;
4. The development application provides sufficient information to allow the PZC to
determine that the development application complies with the relevant review
criteria;
5. The development application complies with the goals and policies of the Avon
Comprehensive Plan;
6. The demand for public services or infrastructure is met by the development
application; and
7. The development relates to the character of the surrounding community.
Conditions:
1. The landscape plan shall be updated to show 3-5 appropriate shrubs between the
new path and the existing Eagle Valley Trail on Tract H; and
2. Engineering analysis shall be conducted per code on all applicable walls.
Commissioner Barnes seconded the motion and it carried 7-0.
VII. Consent Agenda
A – March 19, 2019 Meeting Minutes
B - MJR18011 (L27 B2 WR Addition – Staff missed adding this to the consent agenda)
Action: Commissioner Barnes motioned to approve the consent agenda. Commissioner
Howell seconded the motion and it carried unanimously 7-0.
VIII. Adjourn – The meeting was adjourned at 5:34 pm.
Approved this 21st Day of May 2019
SIGNED: ___________________________________________
Lindsay Hardy, Chairperson
DRAFT
PZC Record of Decision: #MNR19003 Page 1 of 1
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECORD OF DECISION
DATE OF DECISION: April 2, 2019
TYPE OF APPLICATION: Minor Development Plan
PROPERTY LOCATION: Right of Way along West Benchmark Road
FILE NUMBER: MNR19003
APPLICANT: Justin Hildreth
This Record of Decision is made in accordance with the Avon Development Code (“Development Code”) §7.16.080(c):
DECISION: Approval of the development plan with the following findings:
FINDINGS: 1. The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.080(f), Development Plan, §7.16.090(f), Design Review. The design meets the development and design standards established in the Avon Development Code. 2. The development application is complete; 3. The development application provides sufficient information to allow the PZC to determine that the development application complies with the relevant review criteria; 4. The development application complies with the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan; 5. The demand for public services or infrastructure is met by the development application; and 6. The development relates to the character of the surrounding community.
THESE FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECORD OF DECISION ARE HEREBY APPROVED:
BY:______________________________________ DATE: ___________________ PZC Chairperson
DRAFT
PZC Record of Decision: #MNR19001 Page 1 of 1
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECORD OF DECISION
DATE OF DECISION: April 2, 2019
TYPE OF APPLICATION: Minor Development Plan
PROPERTY LOCATION: Lot 7 Riverfront Subdivision and Tract H Block 3 Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision
FILE NUMBER: MNR19001
APPLICANT: Justin Hildreth
This Record of Decision is made in accordance with the Avon Development Code (“Development Code”) §7.16.080(c):
DECISION: Approval of the development plan with the following findings and conditions:
FINDINGS: 1. The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.080(f), Development Plan, §7.16.090(f), Design Review. 2. The design meets the development and design standards established in the Avon Development Code, including §7.32.040, Paved Trail Design. 3. The development application is complete; 4. The development application provides sufficient information to allow the PZC to determine that the development application complies with the relevant review criteria; 5. The development application complies with the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan; 6. The demand for public services or infrastructure is met by the development application; and 7. The development relates to the character of the surrounding community.
CONDITIONS: 1. The landscape plan shall be updated to show 3-5 appropriate shrubs between the new path and the existing Eagle Valley Trail on Tract H; and 2. Engineering analysis shall be conducted per code on all applicable walls.
THESE FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECORD OF DECISION ARE HEREBY APPROVED:
BY:______________________________________ DATE: ___________________ PZC Chairperson
DRAFT
Page I 1 May 21, 2019 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
2646 Bear Trap Fence Application
Staff Report
Case #MNR19004 AEC19003 Public Hearing
May 21, 2019 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting
Project type Alternative Equivalent Compliance and Minor Development Plan
Public Hearing Required
Legal Description Lot 51 Block 2 Wildridge Subdivision
Zoning PUD
Address 2646 Bear Trap
Prepared By David McWilliams, Town Planner
Staff Report Overview
This staff report contains two applications for consideration by the PZC:
1. Minor Development Plan for a new fence.
2. Alternative Equivalent Compliance for a proposed fence on the property.
Summary of Request
Sean Reynolds (the Applicant) recently applied for a Minor Development Plan for the extension of a
deck on the south side of the house and for a new fence to control his dog. To expedite the building of
the deck, approval of that element was granted on April 15, 2019 by Staff. The fence is a two rail fence
with screen mesh. Now, PZC is tasked with reviewing the fence for approval. The neighboring duplex
owner is aware of all proposed modifications and has provided written support of the project.
Property Description
The property is a duplex near the switchback on
Bear Trap. The property therefore was platted
with two fronts, with 25-foot setbacks from each
street face. The fence is not subject to the
setback requirements, but the approved deck is.
The stairway visible on page 1 of attachment A
is an unapproved landscape feature, and may be
subject to PZC review now. Staff suggests a
minor cleanup, as outlined below.
Public Notice
Notice of the public hearing was published
in the May 10, 2019 edition of the Vail Daily
in accordance with Sec. 7.16.020(d) of the
Avon Development Code. Mailed notice is not
required for this application type.
Planning Analysis
Fences in Wildridge
Section 7.28.080(b), of the Municipal Code offers the following intent and design of fence structures in
Wildridge:
Although discouraged in Wildridge and Wildwood, in all instances fences should complement the
property and landscape rather than contain the property. Fences that delineate property
boundaries are not permitted. Fences will be considered for approval by staff only when
Page I 2 May 21, 2019 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
2646 Bear Trap Fence Application
demonstrated by the applicant that the design is consistent with the following criteria:
i. Fence material shall be wood and no more than four (4) feet in height;
ii. Fences shall be constructed using a split rail design with no more than two (2) horizontal
rails;
iii. Fences shall not delineate property lines;
iv. Fences shall not enclose an area of two thousand (2,000) square feet or more;
v. Fences shall ensure that wildlife migration is not negatively affected with the proposed
fence design;
vi. If a fence is part of a multi-family project, approval shall be received from the association
and the fence design shall be integrated with the overall landscape design of the property;
and
vii. If a fence is located on a duplex property, written approval shall be received from the
adjoining property owner and the fence design must be integrated with the overall landscape
design.
Staff Response: The proposal is for an 821 square foot enclosure of a similar makeup to an existing
fence in Wildridge and it does not delineate property lines. The fence follows a preexisting stairway
from the top of the yard to the lower backyard. The application meets all fence requirements except for
i., which therefore requires the Alternative Equivalent Compliance process.
Development Plan Review Criteria.
The following review criteria shall be considered as the basis for a decision on development plan
applications:
1. Evidence of substantial compliance with the purpose of the Development Code as specified in
Section 7.04.030, Purposes;
2. Evidence of substantial compliance with Section 7.16.090, Design review;
3. Consistency with the Avon Comprehensive Plan;
4. Consistency with any previously approved and not revoked subdivision plat, planned
development or any other precedent plan or land use approval for the property as applicable;
5. Compliance with all applicable development and design standards set forth in this Code,
including but not limited to the provisions in Chapter 7.20, Zone Districts and Official Zoning
Map, Chapter 7.24, Use Regulations and Chapter 7.28, Development Standards; and
6. That the development can be adequately served by city services, including but not li mited to
roads, water, wastewater, fire protection and emergency medical services.
Staff Response: This application is compliant with all the applicable review Criteria, except where it
requires an AEC.
7.16.090(f), Design Review
1. The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community; or, where
redevelopment is anticipated, relates the development to the character of Avon as a whole;
2. The design meets the development and design standards established in this Development Code;
and
3. The design reflects the long- range goals and design criteria from the Avon Comprehensive
Plan and other applicable, adopted plan documents.
Staff Response: The design has been evaluated for conformance with these plans and staff has
determined the proposed design meets the requirements, except where it needs an AEC. The lack of
Page I 3 May 21, 2019 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
2646 Bear Trap Fence Application
revegetation on both sides of the stairs is concerning, and staff suggests more attention to this as a
condition of approval.
7.16.120 Alternative Equivalent Compliance
Alternative equivalent compliance is a procedure that allows development to meet the intent of the
design-related provisions of the code through an alternative design. It is not a general waiver or
weakening of regulations; rather, this application procedure permits a site-specific plan that is equal to
or better than the strict application of a design standard specified in the Development Code. This
procedure is not intended as a substitute for a variance or administrative modification or a vehicle for
relief from standards in this Chapter. Alternative compliance shall apply only to the specific site for
which it is requested and does not establish a precedent for assured approval of other requests.
AEC Review Criteria.
The PZC shall use the following review criteria as the basis for a decision on an application for
alternative equivalent compliance:
1. The proposed alternative achieves the intent of the subject design or development standard to
the same or better degree than the subject standard;
2. The proposed alternative achieves the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan to
the same or better degree than the subject standard;
3. The proposed alternative results in benefits to the community that are equivalent to or better
than compliance with the subject standard; and
4. The proposed alternative imposes no greater impacts on adjacent properties than would occur
through compliance with the specific requirements of this Title.
Applicant Response: According to the applicant, the fence will be installed with a screen to keep the
dog in the yard. While the fence deviates from the design standards for Wildridge, this fence type has
been previously approved in the neighborhood and does not impact the neighborhood. (Attachment A,
page 2)
Staff Response: The AEC application achieves the intent of the development standards to the same
degree without causing great impacts on adjacent properties. The fence is located to the side of the
house and is minimally obstructive from the street or adjacent properties. This property is located in
District 11: Northern Residential District, which states in the introduction, “Due to the limited number
of existing trees and shrubs and the open character of the property, special care should be taken to
ensure that all structures are compatible with one another and in harmony with the natural
surroundings.”
Page I 4 May 21, 2019 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
2646 Bear Trap Fence Application
Staff Recommendation for AEC19003 Alternative Equivalent Compliance:
Staff recommends approval of the AEC application for Lot 51 Block 2 Wildridge Subdivision with the
following findings:
Findings:
1. The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.120, Alternative Equivalent
Compliance;
2. The proposed alternative achieves the intent of the subject design or development standard to
the same or better degree than the subject standard;
3. The proposed alternative achieves the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan to
the same or better degree than the subject standard;
4. The proposed alternative results in benefits to the community that are equivalent to or better
than compliance with the subject standard; and
5. The proposed alternative does not imposes greater impacts on adjacent properties than would
occur through compliance with the specific requirements of the Code.
Recommended Motion:
“I move to approve Case #AEC19003, an Alternative Equivalent Compliance application for Lot 51
Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision together with the findings as recommended by staff.”
Staff Recommendation for MNR19004 Minor Development Plan:
Staff recommends approval of the Minor Development application for Lot 51, Block 2, Wildridge
Subdivision with the following findings and condition:
Findings:
1. The application is complete;
2. The application provides sufficient information to allow staff to determine that the application
complies with the relevant review criteria;
3. The application complies with the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan;
4. There is no extra demand for public services or infrastructure exceeding current capacity by
the application;
5. The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community; and
6. The modifications qualify as a Minor Development Plan pursuant to §7.16.080 of the
Development Code.
Page I 5 May 21, 2019 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
2646 Bear Trap Fence Application
Condition:
1. All denuded landscape areas will be reseeded with native mix grass.
Recommended Motion:
“I move to approve Case #MNR19004, a Minor Development application for Lot 51 Block 2, Wildridge
Subdivision together with the findings and condition as recommended by staff.”
Attachments:
A. Application
B. Staff approval for portions of File #MNR19004
N 56d 51' 51" E 101.03'R = 245'
L = 151.3'
< = 35d 20' 37"
R = 2
2
5
'
L = 5
4
.
3
8
'
< = 1
3
d
5
0
'
5
4
"
N
1
9
d
1
2
'
1
5
"
W
1
3
0
.
9
2
'
10'
R
O
A
D
M
A
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
,
D
R
A
I
N
A
G
E
,
A
N
D
S
N
O
W
S
T
O
R
A
G
E
E
A
S
M
E
N
T
10' ROAD MAI
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
,
D
R
A
I
N
A
G
E
,
A
N
D
S
N
O
W
S
T
O
R
A
G
E
E
A
S
M
E
N
T 7.5' DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASMENT10' SIDE SETBACK25' F
R
O
N
T
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
25' FRONT SETBACK
BEARTRAP ROAD
BEARTRAP ROAD
LOT 51B
2646 BEARTRAP ROAD
LOT 51A
NEW UPPER LEVEL
LINE OF EXISTING
LOWER DECK
LINE OF EXISTING
UPPER DECK
LINE OF NEW
UPPER DECK
NEW 10X10
NEW 10X10
EXISTING 10X10
EXISTING 10X10
EXISTING TIMBER WALKNEW FENCE
EXISTING ASPHALT DRIVEWAY
DECK AREA
NEW FENCE
ENCLOSED FENCE
AREA 821 SF
11'-9"10'-3"5'-7"15'-712"5'-7"3'-0"
GREAT ROOM
DINING ROOM
KITCHEN
ENTRY
EXISTING
DECK
NEW DECK
NEW DECK RAILING
TO MATCH EXISTING
NEW DECKEXISTING DECKMINIMUM +36"
REMOVE EXISTING
RAILING
EXISTING TIMBER BEAMEXISTING
DECK JOISTS2X10 LEDGERNOMINAL 10x12 DROPPEDACTUAL 5x10-3/8 DROPPED10X10NEW10X10NEW10X10EXISTING10X10EXISTINGNEW DECKEXISTING DECK2x10s @ 12"OCACTUAL 5x10-3/8 DROPPEDLUC210Z12" DIA SONOTUBE
(7) 2X6VERIFY EXISTING
FOOTING
MINIMUM 3.6SF
ON BF24
12" DIA SONOTUBE
ON BF24
W/(3) 3-16"x4" LEDGERLOK@12" OC - VERIFY RIM JOISTON EXISTING HOUSE2X DECKINGMATCH EXISTABU1010Z
ABU1010Z
5/A1.1
5/A1.1
JURISDICTION TOWN OF AVON, COLORADO
BUILDING CODE VERSION 2015 IRC
SNOW LOAD 75 PSF
WIND SPEED 115 MPH, EXPOSURE B
SEISMIC ZONE C
DECK LIVE LOAD 75 PSF (SNOW)
DECK DEAD LOAD 15 PSF
THE FOUNDATION FOR THIS DECK IS BASED ON AN ASSUMED
BEARING CAPACITY OF 2000 PSF. THE EXCAVATION SHALL BE
EXAMINED BY A LICENSED GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER TO
CONFIRM BEARING CAPACITY.
DECK FOUNDATION TO BE LOCATED BY SURVEYOR PRIOR TO
INSTALLATION TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH SITE SETBACKS.
STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SHALL ACHIEVE A MINIMUM 28-DAY
COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 3000 PSI
ALL 2X FRAMING LUMBER SHALL BE DOUG-FIR #2 OR BETTER,
MINIMUM FLEXURAL STRESS 900 PSI AND MODULUS OF ELASTICITY
1,600,000 PSI.
ALL 4X TIMBERS OR GREATER SHALL E DOUG-FIR #1 OR BETTER,
MINIMUM FLEXURAL STRESS 1350 PSI AND MODULUS OF
ELASTICITY 1,600,000 PSI.
ALL CONNECTION HARDWARE TO BE BY THE SIMPSON COMPANY
10X10 POST
TIMBER BEAM - SEE PLAN
(2) 5/8" DIA LAGS
5"I S S U E S
L A N D S C A P E
A R C H I T E C T
N O T E S
A PNZ Submittal 03.26.19
18-263
April 16, 2019
ral
RAL Architects, Inc.2019 Edwards, Colorado 81632email ~ bobbyl@ralarch.comP.O. Box 1805Phone ~ 970.376.4227Lot 51B, Block 2, Wildridge
S T R U C T U R A L
-
2646 Beartrap Rd #B
Avon, Colorado 81620
Deck Addition
Reynolds Residence
B Revisions 04.16.19
Vicinity Map
Site Plan
Deck Floor PlanDeck Framing Plan
Existing Photos
Deck
Plans
A1.1
Timber Beam Detail
Attachment A
Attachment A
Attachment B
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ADMINISTRATIVE DETERMINATION
APPLICATION TYPE: Minor Development Plan
FILE NUMBER: MNR19004
LOCATION: Lot 56 Block 2 Wildridge Subdivision
ADDRESS: 2646 Beartrap Unit B
OWNER: Sean Reynolds
APPLICANT: Sean Reynolds
SUMMARY: Application to extend the second-floor deck around to the south side of the house.
AVON MUNICIPAL CODE REVIEW STANDARDS:
• §7.16.080 – Development Plan
• §7.28 – Design Standards
STAFF DECISION:
Approved with the following findings and conditions.
FINDINGS:
1. The application is complete;
2. The application provides sufficient information to allow staff to determine that the application complies
with the relevant review criteria;
3. The application complies with the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan;
4. There is no extra demand for public services or infrastructure exceeding current capacity by the
application;
5. The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community; and
6. The modifications qualify as a Minor Development Plan pursuant to §7.16.080 of the Development Code.
CONDITIONS:
1. All disturbed areas will be reseeded with native mix grass;
2. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review the fence aspect of the application and it’s approval is
not granted by this administrative determination; and
3. A survey will be required to assure that the new deck is within the building envelope .
DATE: April 15, 2019
BY: David McWilliams, Town Planner
May 21, 2019 Work Session – Village at Avon Residential Project 1
To: Planning and Zoning Commission
From: David McWilliams, Town Planner
Matt Pielsticker, Planning Director
Meeting Date: May 21, 2019
Topic: Preliminary Plan for Lot 1 Filing 1 Planning Areas F and D
Village at Avon Subdivision
INTRODUCTION
This memo contains preliminary design material for a new residential complex in the Village at
Avon for consideration by the PZC. While this potential project is not subject to Chapter 7 of
Avon Municipal Code and will not be subject to the formal Town of Avon review process outlined
within it, PZC is tasked with formulating comments that the Village at Avon (VAA) Design
Review Board (DRB) can use for their formal review. Staff crafted specific recommendations,
based on the Design Guidelines, for PZC’s consideration to relay to the DRB. The intent is to give
the DRB a set of tangible discussion points that can be acted upon.
The Design Guidelines are best described as the desired aesthetic of all projects and more
articulations of aspirations than hard requirements. Per the Design Guidelines, “The DRB shall
refer to the Town of Avon's Planning and Zoning Commission, for comment only, and not for
approval or disapproval, Development proposals submitted to the DRB.” The proposal is
approaching a completed application for the DRB, and this may be PZC’s only look at the project.
This report seeks to address common design considerations that would be contained in any
development application through the lens of the VAA Design Guidelines.
Property Description
The proposal includes land in Planning area F
and D. In 2018, a PUD Amendment for
Planning Area F allowed for an increase in
residential density and a reduction in required
Commercial square footage. The property is
situated at the northwest corner of Post
Boulevard and East Beaver Creek Boulevard
(referred to as “the Property”). The Nottingham
Puder Ditch is the northern boundary of
property. Currently, there is a Subdivision
application that would create a 10-acre parcel
and realignment of the roadway. Grade
differential from ditch to road is roughly 42 feet
just for reference. The Village at Avon PUD Guide, the governing zoning document, permits a
density of 22 dwelling units per acre and 58 feet in height (with 100-foot road step back) not to
exceed four stories for Planning Area F; and 18 dwelling units per acre and 48 feet in height for
Planning Area D.
May 21, 2019 Work Session – Village at Avon Residential Project 2
Project Summary
A preliminary development application is in front of the VAA DRB. The application proposes
240 apartment units between eight buildings, including a central clubhouse with residential units
and two additional types of residential buildings.
Planning Analysis
Most sections below start with an included quoted text from The Village (at Avon) Design Review
Guidelines to frame the elements of importance. All text is unmodified in formatting, except for
italicized portions added for emphasis by staff. Staff occasionally includes page numbers, (in
parenthesis) which references the applicable page from the complete plan set, which is included
as a link online.
Allowed Use and Density: As noted above, residential use is allowed in both Planning Areas and
the proposed density does not exceed capacity for either Area.
Lot Coverage, Setback and Easements: The property appears to be compliant with all applicable
coverage, setback, and easement requirements.
Building Height: The PUD Guide requires that multi-family buildings located in Planning Area F
be limited to a maximum of defines story(ies) and 58’ tall. A Story is defined as “a space in a
Building between two adjacent floors or between a floor and an adjacent roof, excluding vaulted
spaces with or without a floor, outdoor area, roof rooftop patios/decks and similar spaces, and
excluding any Story which has a ceiling height that is less than 6 feet above Finished Grade (e.g.,
basements, garden level basements and underground parking garages). Where grades are
Approximate plan view of the project showing road reorientation
May 21, 2019 Work Session – Village at Avon Residential Project 3
necessary to be lowered to allow for vehicular parking garage access or pedestrian access into a
Story which has a ceiling height that is less than 6 feet above Finished Grade, Finished Grade shall
be assumed at a level as if these accesses did not exist (e.g., Finished Grade level on either side of
the access)”.
Using finished grade as the limiting building height parameter to meet the requirements, as
proposed, the applicant has demonstrated compliance with the numerical height standards. Prior
to building permit submittal, staff expects to see the west half of Building 1, particularly the final
civil plans for the area near the southwest corner of the building, to demonstrate grades not more
than 6’ for the lower parking level.
Design Comments
Design Theme: “In order to create a unique, pedestrian friendly, vibrant, successful, and long
lasting town that enriches the quality of life and maximizes/enhances and preserves the value of
the Property, the design of all Development within the Village must, among other things,
distinguish itself by being unique, sustainable, interesting, attractive, and must respect the
mountain setting as well as complement the surrounding Development within the Village. The
Overall Design Theme (hereinafter referred to as the “Design Theme”) is to establish an attractive
appearance for visitors and residents and yet be flexible enough to allow for affordable design
solutions.”
“The attractive appearance expected for Development consists of, among other things, innovative
and attractive architecture that promotes sustainable ideas and is sensitive to the surrounding
area.”
“the DRB shall not accept exceptions to the Design Theme and Design Philosophy that break the
pattern of unique and attractive architecture for Development at the Village, as any exceptions will
negatively impact the Village and will promote unattractive architecture for Development in the
future.”
Overall, the project may deviate from this Design Theme and there are few discernable nods to
sustainability, evidenced by extra parking spaces and no green roof apparatus proposed. The project
could include further unique innovations that respect the mountain setting and create interesting or
attractive facades and spaces.
Easements, Drainage, Retaining Walls: Town engineer Justin Hildreth is working directly with
the project engineer and did not provide any comments on the application at this stage. There are
few retaining walls with this development proposal. The drainage study is being finalized to
demonstrate how the adjacent detention pond can accommodate future uphill development.
Parking: “Planning Area F - underground parking is highly encouraged. However, if the Owner
can show that the Design Philosophy is still achieved with surface parking, the DRB is willing to
consider alternatives.”
“The DRB encourages, in all cases, the use of underground and structured parking as opposed to
large surface parking fields, as such fields generally do not fit into the Design Philosophy.” (L1.1)
This proposal includes a 2-story parking structure in the Clubhouse building that is mostly above
ground, 1-car garages in building type 2 and 3, and surface parking supporting the rest of the
development. There are a parking roofs over spaces near the southeast and far west corners of the
May 21, 2019 Work Session – Village at Avon Residential Project 4
project. Per the PUD requirements, studios require 1 space, 1BR units require 1.5 spaces, and larger
units require 2 spaces, plus 10 additional guest spaces; a note in a developer response page mentions
that 6 additional parking spaces were added (per a DRB comment) in front of the Clubhouse. This
extra parking in this location might detract from a pedestrian friendly environment and encourage
auto trips even though the property is well connected to transit and across the street from large
retailers. Staff is concerned that the design philosophy is not fully achieved by the parking regimen.
In building type 2 and 3, staff feels like the single garage units have wasted space due to the
segmenting and internal corridors created (M1.06). Garages that are only accessed from the outside
may be a better use of space for families with lots of gear.
Bus Stop: There is no bus stop location proposed. In discussions during the 2018 PUD Amendment
regarding the valley parcels and transit connections, it was discussed that there would be up to four
transit stops (2 in each direction), one of which to be located in the vicinity of this project. Staff
suggests that the location be near the western entrance, and pedestrian connections should be
enhanced.
Access Drive and Street Front: “Access to the building sites will require careful consideration of,
among other things, the existing topography, buildings’ solar orientation, and the integration of the
present and future public vehicular and pedestrian systems.”
“Avoiding the sea of asphalt feel is something that can provide interest to a project at the same time
as benefiting the environment.”
Conceptual Imagery of Example Treatment for Parking Lots from Exhibit D, Design Guidelines.
“All entryways should: provide a sheltered transition to the inside; offer visual clues as to the
desired pedestrian circulation; possess inviting features; address the street; relate, in both scale and
design style, to the use of the Building.”
May 21, 2019 Work Session – Village at Avon Residential Project 5
“North facing entries and outdoor spaces should be carefully considered because of winter
conditions.”
“All doorway and entryways must provide protection from sloughing snow or ice, be well lit
without light pollution, and offer a spot for pedestrians and bicycle traffic to gather.”
There are two (2) access drives for the property located roughly 595 feet from each other. The
western entrance is surrounded by buildings and looks urban, while the eastern entrance is
surrounded by parking and has a more suburban, auto-oriented feel. The Clubhouse appears to not
enthusiastically greet the street. There are few ecological treatments of the type advised by the
Conceptual Imagery on Page 4 of this report, except the bioswale on the east side parking lot.
The building 2 and 3 garage-side elevations do not present many inviting features (A3.11 and
A3.21). The pedestrian entrances on these buildings are minimally enhanced with covered entries,
with the building generally internalized and turning their backs to the street.
Landscaping: “Acceptable landscape design will, among other things; retain and promote as much
healthy native vegetation as practical, encourage creativity and personalized design of the
landscaping, conserve water by creating landscapes where water-wise plants predominate,
minimize the use of water-heavy plants and limit water-heavy plants to specific focal areas, limit
total irrigation coverage using microclimate responsive design of irrigation systems and their
conscientious operation, eradicate and prevent noxious weed infestations, minimize site grading,
take into consideration the location and impact on the surrounding area, and respect and enhance
the design of the streetscapes.”
“The minimum landscaped area required is equal to 20% of the gross site area less the footprint of all
approved Buildings.”
“Irrigation is required in all formal landscaped areas.”
“Any area outside the approved area of construction disturbance is deemed a natural area and is to
remain in its natural state.”
“All planted areas should not exceed a maximum slope of 2:1 with a minimum of two percent (2%).
All grass areas should not exceed a slope of 4:1 with a minimum of two percent (2%).”
“Maximum site coverage for all Buildings is 30% or as the DRB recommends. Maximum site
coverage for all impervious materials is 50% or as the DRB recommends.”
“Surrounding the Buildings and along the public ways (and within ROW), landscape plantings,
walks, public lighting, site furnishings, and signage shall create a year-round synergetic, coherent,
and environmentally friendly and festive atmosphere.” (L1.1)
The project proposes a Landscape Area of 55% and a site coverage (of building and carport) of
17%, but does not measure impervious material coverage.
There are no details of landscape buffer at sidewalk.
No details on Tot Lot.
There are several existing trees on the northern undeveloped slope. The ditch is proposed to be
relocated, and staff understands that there must be regrading in this area. Staff suggests a limit of
disturbance plan sheet that preserves as many of the trees as possible.
While not spelled out in the Design Guidelines, staff suggests the inclusion of an irrigation plan,
and amended tree soil, so there is a minimum planting hole diameter two (2) times as large as the
root ball diameter, with at least 5% organic matter. These best practices are part of Avon’s
Development Code and should be honored.
May 21, 2019 Work Session – Village at Avon Residential Project 6
Four-sided Design: PZC has paid careful attention to Four-Sided Design in recent development
applications but it is not part of these Design Guidelines. Staff recommends assessing the function
and the appearance of the proposal with this in mind.
Building Design, Building Materials and Colors: “Articulation in Building planes should be of
a magnitude and dimension that is consistent with the overall scale and massing of the Building, as
well as the intent in design and appearance.”
Staff is concerned that there are several points where the buildings appear as a continuous mass,
with only a cursory nod to articulation. This is most evident on the north and south elevations of
Building 1. The buildings are not proposed with air conditioning, and staff is concerned that without
enhanced solar balancing, these buildings could overheat in the summer.
The building treatment that fronts the pool deck on Building 1, creates minimal visual interest and
lacks a sense of place. Bringing up the finished grade and increasing landscaping at the base of
the parking structure will help ground the building and bring the building into further conformance
with the “four story” height limitation. The attached images that depict mature landscaping help
to visualize how landscaping map “ground” the building and bring it into context with its
surroundings.
Scale and Massing: “In some cases residential apartment buildings, are boxy and out of human
scale, primarily for economic reasons. The goal is to have the design professional break up the
Building massing and add the layering of architectural elements to create a more pleasant presence
to the Building user. Traer Creek Plaza has set the standard for mixed-use economically sustainable
Buildings that are innovatively designed to eliminate the standard, and out of human scale, Building
design. The Plaza has avoided standard boxy architecture altogether and should be an inspiration to
any future Development design.
All Buildings must face the street and take suitable measures to minimize its impact on all visible
facades.
It is encouraged to use elements to break down the out of human scale and boxy architecture and
create interest. Covered circulation, shading devices, canopies, Building entries can all be used to
accomplish this. The Wal-Mart and The Home Depot canopy design are the standard for diffusing
the standard box architecture.
Passive solar design as a component of the architectural design of individual Buildings is
encouraged.”
“Terraced Buildings and parking will minimize site disturbance, provide less costly construction
and provide opportunities for privacy and views by grade separation.”
The proposal includes a minimum of terracing on the Clubhouse building, and none to speak of on
buildings 2 and 3. The buildings are boxy, and the parapet only adds to the sheer perceived bulk.
Staff encourages a reassessment of these points to benefit the project. The breaks that were added
to the parapet design help with articulation.
Windows: “Windows create interest in Building facades and communicate the type of Building
and activities that are present. Windows may act as a lantern, establishing activity and vibrancy in
the evening streetscape.” (A8.00)
May 21, 2019 Work Session – Village at Avon Residential Project 7
Roof Material, Pitch and Pedestrian Protection: “Each Building should utilize green roof
technologies while creating a unique expression of quality. It is strongly recommended that all
primary roofs are to be “green roofs” or “grass roofs” simple in form and skyline. Roofs may be
exterior usable space or a site for photovoltaic or hydronic collectors.”
There does not appear to be any green aspect to the roofing. Staff is minimally concerned that these
roofs will be visually obtrusive but would appreciate some nod to the design guidelines.
Trash Storage: “Service areas, such as loading bays, recycling areas, dumpsters, compactors,
storage areas and large utility equipment (including ground mounted equipment such as power
transformers and air handling equipment), must be enclosed, screened, or located such that they
are not visible from the streets and adjacent land uses such as pedestrian access ways so that they
do not negatively impact the Village by being in the public view.”
There is a trash chute and storage proposed in the Clubhouse building within the parking structure.
Staff encourages this arrangement to have adequate recycling provisions that function for hauling
companies.
Exterior Lighting: “Nighttime lighting on a site shall be designed to minimize glare, light trespass
and light pollution and to conserve energy and maintain night-time safety.”
The proposed lighting plan is complete and provides an appropriate amount of lighting.
Snow Removal: “Snow piles are unsightly, are hazards to traffic that can block ingress and egress
and view corridors, cause safety issues, cause potential fire hazards, and do not conform to the
Design Philosophy.”
There is one snow storage area proposed on the northwest corner of the property (L1.2). Staff
expects that a more thorough snow removal plan will be in place before the building is constructed.
Bicycle Facilities, Mobility and Connectivity: “The Village will share common connectors of
vehicular and pedestrian traffic. These links will be connections of similar design details, utilizing
both natural and man made design elements.”
“Properties must include continued paths, as they cross the landscaped property. This should
include a continued theme of plantings that co-exist with existing landscapes along the walking
paths. Also, to be included are benches and/or other rest areas for pedestrians, as necessary. Also
to be considered are storage areas and equipment for bicycles and other alternative transportation.”
“The carefully planned transition between auto and pedestrian is an important element that
encourages the use of convenient parking and inviting pedestrian paths.”
Paths through the property seem to accomplish the above statements; the paths between this
property and adjacent properties may require more attention to accomplish the Design Theme. The
drainage basin on the western edge of the property acts as a barricade to pedestrian permeability.
The ditch on north side of the property is envisioned to be a linear park or soft trail, allowing for
connectivity throughout the Village’s valley floor, and a creative connection on the east side
encouraged.
May 21, 2019 Work Session – Village at Avon Residential Project 8
Development Transitions: “The carefully planned transition between auto and pedestrian is an
important element that encourages the use of convenient parking and inviting pedestrian paths.”
“The architecture at the Village should create visually pleasing, enjoyable Buildings and structures
that create an architecturally vibrant Village. Buildings shall include quality design details and
utilize elements of design that will add context and interest to achieve the Design Philosophy. The
standard for architectural design shall be Traer Creek Plaza.”
“Each Building must be a unique expression that complements the Village by contributing to the
fabric as one among many, not to stand alone. The designer is to establish a unique stylistic
expression, while using complementary forms of material and color.”
While the 2018 PUD amendment made any seamless transition in use between Traer Creek Plaza
and Planning Area F unlikely, the transition in form between the Traer Creek development and
this proposal is rather abrupt and could be reassessed.
Screening: “All roof mounted machinery, vents, fans, etc. will be screened and hidden from sight.
All loading and refuse areas, mechanical or utility equipment will be screened.”
Besides the parapet, no roof or ground mounted mechanical equipment is noted on the plans.
Mail room: (M1.02)
Staff has no knowledge of mail delivery at the VAA, and wonders if a mail room is the best use of
space in the main floor of Building 1.
AVAILABLE RECOMMENDATIONS
Below is a list of design suggestions taken from the above analysis. Staff suggests PZC discuss
these points, and any additional suggestions or considerations that could be helpful for the VAA
DRB as it reviews this project:
1. Modify the amount of surface and raised parking, boxy design, and lack of visual interest
to achieve the Design Philosophy;
2. Include stronger pedestrian connections to the southwest corner of the property in order
to connect to a future anticipated bus stop location;
3. Reflect the mountain setting and create more interesting and attractive facades and spaces;
4. Encourage sustainability of the project by modifying roofs and parking;
5. Reimagine the parking in front of the Clubhouse to better interact with the street and
promote walkability;
6. Include articulation and step-backs or terracing on buildings;
7. Final Landscape Plans should ensure there is a minimum planting hole diameter of two
(2) times as large as the root ball diameter for trees, with at least 5% organic matter;
8. Include the impervious area count;
9. Include an irrigation plan;
10. Provide details for the Tot lot and the landscape buffer between the sidewalk and the
road;
11. Include details on landscape buffer and the tot lot;
May 21, 2019 Work Session – Village at Avon Residential Project 9
12. Include additional bicycle parking in the Clubhouse garage or near the primary pedestrian
entrance;
13. Design a pedestrian connection on the west side of the property;
14. Include adequately sized trash and recycling protocol for all building types; and
15. Update the PUD master plan map to reflect the new proposed property line and
corresponding Planning Area boundaries.
Functionality suggestions:
1. Rework the single unit garages to eliminate the internal entrance thus increasing their
storage space;
2. Reassess the need for a mail room;
3. Include a snow removal plan; and
Attachments:
- Images with Landscaping
- Marked up Images – Highlighting Changes since Preliminary DRB Submittal
- Material Board
April 30, 2019 DRB Update Plan Set:
http://avon.org/DocumentCenter/View/19377/Tract-F-Village-at-Avon-Preliminary-Design-For-
PZC-Comments