PZC Packet 0219191 Agenda posted on Friday, February 15, 2019 at the following public places within the Town of Avon:
-Avon Municipal Building, Avon Recreation Center, Avon Public Library, Town of Avon Website www.avon.org
Please call 970-748-4023 for questions.
Planning & Zoning Commission
Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, February 19, 2019
100 Mikaela Way – Avon Municipal Building
If you require special accommodation, please contact us in advance and we will assist you. You may call David McWilliams at 970-
748-4023 or email cmcwilliams@avon.org for special requests.
I. Call to Order – 5:00pm
II. Roll Call
III. Additions & Amendments to the Agenda
IV. Conflicts of Interest
V. Major Design Plans and Alternative Equivalent Compliance –2177 Saddle Ridge Loop - PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. North Home
File: MJR19002 and AEC19001
Applicant: Jeff Manley, Martin Manley Architects
Property: Lot 22A, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision
Owner: 2177 Saddle ridge Loop LLC, Brandt Marott
Summary: Application for a new single-family home. An AEC is required for the roof pitch.
B. South Home
File: MJR19003 and AEC19002
Applicant: Jeff Manley, Martin Manley Architects
Property: Lot 22B, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision
Owner: 2177 Saddle ridge Loop LLC, Brandt Marott
Summary: Application for a new single-family home. An AEC is required for the roof pitch.
VI. Code Text Amendments – CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING
File: CTA19001
Applicant: Town of Avon
Summary: Code amendments are proposed for the following items: Alternative Design
(formerly Alternative Equivalent Compliance); Inclusionary Zoning; Development
Bonus; Short-term Rentals; Roof Design; and Wildfire Mitigation.
VII. Consent Agenda
A – February 5, 2018 Meeting Minutes
B – MJR18001 – Major Design and Development Plan Record of Decision
VIII. Adjourn
PZC Record of Decision: #MJR19001 Page 1 of 1
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION TO TOWN COUNCIL
DATE OF DECISION: February 5, 2019
TYPE OF APPLICATION: Major Development Plan
PROPERTY LOCATION: Lot 4 Riverfront Subdivision
FILE NUMBER: MJR19001
APPLICANT: Jim Telling
This Record of Decision is made in accordance with the Avon Development Code (“Development Code”) §7.16.080(c):
DECISION: Recommendation that Town Council approve the development plan with the following findings and conditions:
Findings:
1. The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.080(f), Development Plan, §7.16.090(f), Design Review. The design meets the development and design standards established in the Avon Development Code and the PUD Design Standards;
2. The application is complete;
3. The application provides sufficient information to allow the PZC to determine that the application complies with the relevant review criteria;
4. The application complies with the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan; and
5. The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community.
Conditions:
1. Temporary irrigation systems must be removed upon sufficient vegetation establishment, which shall not exceed one (1) year for ground cover, two (2) years for shrubs or three (3) years for trees;
2. A satisfactory irrigation plan that achieves silver or better LEED standards, and demonstrates square footage coverage and hydrozones shall be presented to staff and approved prior to a building permit;
3. A stormwater quality plan will be approved by staff before issuing a building permit;
4. No trees beyond those indicated on the landscape plan will be removed without the approval of the Town, and special efforts will be made to preserve existing vegetation;
5. A lighting spec sheet is required for confirmation of AMC requirements; and
6. Staff shall verify existing easements and lot lines on a site plan before a building permit will be issued.
THESE FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECORD OF DECISION ARE HEREBY APPROVED:
BY:______________________________________ DATE: ___________________ PZC Chairperson
1 PZC Minutes – February 5, 2019
Planning & Zoning Commission
Meeting Minutes
Tuesday, February 5, 2019
I. Call to Order – The meeting was called to order at 5:02 pm.
II. Roll Call – All commissioners were present except for commissioner Hardy. Commissioner Barnes acted as
the chairperson.
III. Additions & Amendments to the Agenda – There were no additions or amendments to the agenda.
IV. Conflicts of Interest
V. Major Design Review –2613 Bear Trap - CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING
File: MJR18011
Applicant: Jeff Manley, Martin Manley Architects
Property: Lot 27, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision
Owner: Dana Del Gizzi
Summary: Jeff Manley presented a phased addition to the home.
Action: Commissioner Nusbaum motioned to approve the item with the following findings
and conditions:
Findings:
1. The application is complete;
2. The application provides sufficient information to allow the PZC to determine that
the application complies with the relevant review criteria;
3. The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.080(f), Development Plan,
§7.16.090(f), Design Review. The design meets the development and design
standards established in the Avon Development Code;
4. The application complies with the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive
Plan;
5. The extra demand for public services is met by the application; and
6. The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community.
Conditions:
1. All disturbed areas will be reseeded with the originally approved native mix grass or
sod;
2. Temporary irrigation systems must be above-ground and shall be removed upon
sufficient vegetation establishment, which shall not exceed one (1) year for ground
cover, two (2) years for shrubs or three (3) years for trees;
3. The units shall be in good standing with the Eagle River Water and Sanitation District
before any TCO or CO will be issued for the additions; and
4. The deck shall be revised to bring it into conformance with applicable setbacks.
Commissioner Glaner seconded the motion and it carried unanimously 6-0.
VI. Major Development Plan – 254 Riverfront Lane – PUBLIC HEARING
File: MJR19001
Legal Description: Lot 4 Riverfront Subdivision
Applicant: Jim Telling
Owner: East-West Partners
2 PZC Minutes – February 5, 2019
Summary: Jim Telling, David Kaselak, and Pedro Campos presented an application to build two
(2) duplexes on the property to the west of the approved Lodge building.
Action: Commissioner Golembiewski motioned to approve the item with the following
findings and conditions:
Findings:
1. The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.080(f), Development Plan,
§7.16.090(f), Design Review. The design meets the development and design
standards established in the Avon Development Code and the PUD Design Standards;
2. The application is complete;
3. The application provides sufficient information to allow the PZC to determine that
the application complies with the relevant review criteria;
4. The application complies with the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive
Plan; and
5. The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community.
Conditions:
1. Temporary irrigation systems must be removed upon sufficient vegetation
establishment, which shall not exceed one (1) year for ground cover, two (2) years for
shrubs or three (3) years for trees;
2. A satisfactory irrigation plan that achieves silver or better LEED standards, and
demonstrates square footage coverage and hydrozones shall be presented to staff
and approved prior to a building permit;
3. A stormwater quality plan will be approved by staff before issuing a building permit;
4. No trees beyond those indicated on the landscape plan will be removed without the
approval of the Town, and special efforts will be made to preserve existing
vegetation;
5. A lighting spec sheet is required for confirmation of AMC requirements; and
6. Staff shall verify existing easements and lot lines on a site plan before a building
permit will be issued.
Commissioner Howell seconded the motion and it carried unanimously 6-0.
VII. Code Text Amendments – PUBLIC HEARING
File: CTA19001
Applicant: Town of Avon
Summary: Code amendments are proposed for the following items: Alternative Design
(formerly Alternative Equivalent Compliance); Inclusionary Zoning; Development
Bonus; Short-term Rentals; Roof Design; and Wildfire Mitigation.
Public Comments: Jeff Manley and Ruth Bourne commented on the application.
Action: Commissioner Howell motioned to continue the public hearing to February 19
pending edits to the amendments. Commissioner Nusbaum seconded the motion
and it carried unanimously 6-0.
VIII. Consent Agenda
A – December 18, 2018 Meeting Minutes
B – Lot 22 Block 1 Wildridge PUD Amendment
C – January 15, 2019 Meeting Minutes
Action: Commissioner Nusbaum motioned to approve the consent agenda. Commissioner
Glaner seconded the motion and it carried unanimously 6-0.
IX. Adjourn – The meeting was adjourned at 8:35 pm.
3 PZC Minutes – February 5, 2019
Approved this 19th Day of February 2019
SIGNED: ___________________________________________
Chairperson
February 19, 2019 PZC Meeting – 2177 Saddle Ridge A
1
Staff Report – Major Development Plan & Alternative Equivalent Compliance
February 19, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission
Meeting Case #MJR19002 and AEC19001
Project type
Major Development Plan and Alternative Equivalent Compliance
Public Hearing Required
Legal Description Lot 22A Block 1Wildridge Subdivision
Zoning Planned Unit Development (PUD)
Address 2177 Saddle Ridge
Prepared By David McWilliams, Town Planner
Staff Report Overview
This staff report contains two applications for consideration by the PZC: Major Development Plan with
Design Review for a new proposed single-family house; and an Alternative Equivalent Compliance
(AEC) for the roof pitch under the required 4:12 pitch.
Summary of Request
Jeff Manley (the Applicant) with Martin Manley Architects proposes a new house for Lot 22A (the
north unit). The building is 3 stories, 2,761 s.f. of livable space and includes an 831 s.f. garage. The
lower level is ground level at the garage side and located below grade on the uphill side of the house.
It has shed roofs at 3:12 pitch. The proposal is best described as mountain modern style.
Public Notice
Notice of the public hearing was published in the February 8 edition of the Vail Daily in accordance
with Sec. 7.16.020(d) of the Avon
Development Code. Mailed notice is not
required for this application type.
Property Description
Lot 22A is .286 acres located near the
intersection of Saddle Ridge Loop and
Beaver Creek Point. It is zoned PUD and
accommodates a single family per the PUD
standards, updated in early 2019. It borders
duplex and single-family houses.
Planning Analysis
Lot Coverage, Setback and Easements: Lot
22A has a building envelope, easements, and a
limit of disturbance line that were modified
during the PUD amendment process, shown on
Attachment B, sheet A1.1.
Building Height: The maximum building height permitted for this property 35 feet. The applicant
February 19, 2019 PZC Meeting – 2177 Saddle Ridge A
2
is proposing a maximum building height of 30’ – 5 13/16” if the AEC is approved, and discussed in
the AEC section, below.
Parking: The project requires three (3) parking spaces, which are provided between the garage and
the spaces in front of the garage.
Design Standards Analysis
Landscaping & Irrigation: The property is proposed to be landscaped primarily with aspen, a spruce
tree, three deciduous shrub species, native grasses, ground cover, and mulch areas (Attachment B, sheet
A1.3). The Landscape Unit count provided is 150 with 144 required. The application takes advantage of
the bonus for retained vegetation and for temporary irrigation. Permanent drip irrigation is proposed.
Staff reviewed a satellite view of the parcel and noticed a possible slight
overreach of the neighboring property’s landscaping and irrigation. The
mitigation of this is suggested as a condition of approval. Staff is concerned
that the spruce tree is planned too close to the house and may be deemed a
fire hazard by the fire code. A condition to place the tree further away from
the house is included in the recommended motion, below.
Building Design, Building Materials and Colors: The primary exterior building materials are wood
siding (stained “silver city” and two shades of dark brown) and stone veneer (Attachment B, sheet
A0.0). Colors were reviewed for conformance with Sec. 7.28.090(j)(4)(viii), Building Materials, and
determined to comply with the design standards. All materials are of high quality and compliment
Avon’s built landscape.
Retaining Walls: There are two retaining walls on the south radiating from the garage to build into
the hill and create positive drainage. All retaining walls are proposed as river rock materials and rock
excavated during construction. They are between four (4’) and two (2’) feet tall.
Roof Material and Pitch: The roof material and pitch were reviewed for compliance with Sec. 7.28.090-
(d)(3) Roofs. The applicant is proposing exclusively 3:12 roof pitches. Pitches are required to be 4:12
or above, therefore an Alternative Equivalent Compliance review is necessary, found below.
Exterior Lighting: The proposed lighting (Attachment C), is all recessed can lights below roofs or
overhangs, is Dark Sky Compliant, and the locations and quantity are found to be compliant with lighting
code.
Major Development Plan & Design Review - Review Criteria
§ 7.16.080(f), Development Plan
1. Evidence of substantial compliance with the purpose of the Development Code as
specified in §7.04.030, Purposes;
Staff Response: The Application complies with the applicable purposes outlined in the Development
Code. Purpose (a) states, “Divide the Town into zones, restricting and requiring therein the location,
erection, construction, reconstruction, alteration and use of buildings, structures and land for trade,
industry, residence and other specified uses; regulate the intensity of the use of lot areas; regulate and
determine the area of open spaces surrounding such buildings; establish building lines and locations
February 19, 2019 PZC Meeting – 2177 Saddle Ridge A
3
of buildings designed for specified industrial, commercial, residential and other uses within such areas;
establish standards to which buildings or structures shall conform; establish standards for use of areas
adjoining such buildings or structures.”
2. Evidence of substantial compliance with §7.16.090, Design Review;
Staff Response: This Major Design and Development Plan Application should be assessed for
compliance with the Design Review criteria of the Development Code. The Design Review section
seeks quality development and structures that are visually harmonious with the site and the surrounding
vicinity. Conformance with this code section is discussed below and in Staff Analysis.
3. Consistency with the Avon Comprehensive Plan;
Staff Response: The site is located in the Northern Residential District (District 11 of the
Comprehensive Plan), which states, “Due to the limited number of existing trees and shrubs and the
open character of the property, special care should be taken to ensure that all structures are compatible
with one another and in harmony with the natural surroundings.”
The District includes principles that encourage minimal alteration to the natural environment and steep
slope development. This Application generally proposes a design that is consistent with the Goals and
Policies contained in the Comprehensive Plan. Policy C.2.4 states, “Encourage landscaping and
building locations that enhance neighborhood views and view corridors.”
4. Consistency with any previously approved and not revoked subdivision plat, planned
development, or any other precedent plan or land use approval for the property as
applicable;
Staff Response: The application is in conformance with the accompanying requirements of the PUD
zoning and the Development Code.
5. Compliance with all applicable development and design standards set forth in this Code,
including but not limited to the provisions in Chapter 7.20, Zone Districts and Official
Zoning Map, Chapter 7.24, Use Regulations, and Chapter 7.28, Development Standards;
and
Staff Response: The analysis contained in this staff report addresses all applicable Development Code
standards.
6. That the development can be adequately served by city services including but
not limited to roads, water, wastewater, fire protection, and emergency medical services.
Staff Response: The proposal was referred to the Eagle River Water and Sanitation District, and
comments received were addressed by the applicant. All special services are well established in the
subdivision.
§7.16.090(f), Design Review
1. The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community;
or, where redevelopment is anticipated, relates the development to the character of Avon as
a whole;
Staff Response: The Application proposes a design that relates to the character of the surrounding
community.
February 19, 2019 PZC Meeting – 2177 Saddle Ridge A
4
2. The design meets the development and design standards established in this Development
Code; and
Staff Response: Besides the roof design, the design is either compliant with the development and design
standards contained in the Development Code or seeks an Alternative Equivalent Compliance.
3. The design reflects the long-range goals and design criteria from the Avon
Comprehensive Plan and other applicable, adopted plan documents.
Staff Response: Applicable adopted plans include the Avon Comprehensive Plan and provisions of the
Development Code. The design has been evaluated for conformance with these plans and besides
the concerns mentioned, staff has determined the proposed design meets the requirements as proposed.
7.16.120 - Alternative Equivalent Compliance
Alternative equivalent compliance is a procedure that allows development to meet the intent of the
design-related provisions through an alternative design. It is not a general waiver or weakening of
regulations; rather, this application procedure permits a site-specific plan that is equal to or better
than the strict application of a design standard specified in the Development Code. This procedure is
not intended as a substitute for a variance or administrative modification or a vehicle for relief from
standards in this Chapter. Alternative compliance shall apply only to the specific site for which it is
requested and does not establish a precedent for assured approval of other requests.
Review Criteria.
The PZC shall use the following review criteria as the basis for a decision on an application for
alternative equivalent compliance:
1. The proposed alternative achieves the intent of the subject design or development standard to
the same or better degree than the subject standard;
2. The proposed alternative achieves the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan to
the same or better degree than the subject standard;
3. The proposed alternative results in benefits to the community that are equivalent to or better
than compliance with the subject standard; and
4. The proposed alternative imposes no greater impacts on adjacent properties than would occur
through compliance with the specific requirements of this Title.
AEC Request
The roof design component requires an AEC for PZC consideration. The Application proposes a
minimum roof pitch of 3:12, instead of the required 4:12 on the roof sections, in deviation of AMC sec.
7.28.090(d)(3)(i):
All residential buildings shall have pitched roofs with a rise of not less than four (4) inches in twelve
(12) inches of distance. Primary roofs shall have a four-to-twelve (4:12) minimum and a twelve-to-
twelve (12:12) maximum. Secondary roofs shall have a four-to-twelve (4:12) minimum and metal roofs
shall have a three-to-twelve (3:12) minimum. Flat roofs may be permitted as secondary roofs or if the
flat roof is consistent with the architectural style of the building.
Applicant Response
The mountain modern design uses low snug roofs. This aids in neighboring houses being able to look
over this home. The scale of the building is lower. The comparison house shown with 4:12 forms has
a higher overall height (30’–5 13/16” vs 32’–5 13/16”) and empty interior space. The “pivot point” of
the roof is at the wall and therefore following code would simply result in an unnecessarily taller
structure.
February 19, 2019 PZC Meeting – 2177 Saddle Ridge A
5
Staff Analysis
PZC is instructed to review the alternative for achieving the intent of the subject design standard, which
is in part informed by the Purposes section of Avon Municipal Code. Section 7.04.030(l) states,
“Promote architectural design which is compatible, functional, practical and complimentary checking
to Avon's sub-alpine environment.” The design as presented appears to meet all of the guidelines. The
intent of mandating a 4:12 pitch is to create an attractive angled shape of the roof, and a unified aesthetic
throughout town. Snow loading is another concern that the Municipal Code seeks to avoid by
prohibiting low-pitched roofs.
The type of home proposed is best described as “mountain modern,” which generally favors a lower
pitched roof, unique structure shape, and large windows and doors. The height reduction and layout
seem to adhere to the Avon Comprehensive Plan, “Policy A.1.5: Promote development that maximizes
sun exposure and protects views.”
Overall, staff is confident that that the roof design AEC application achieves the intent of the Municipal
Code to the same degree as the 4:12 regulation does. Staff feels that the 3:12 pitches do not hurt the
overall aesthetic and the design favorably compliments the adjacent properties and surrounding
community. The PZC should carefully assess the application for compliance with the review criteria,
listed above. Staff has outlined a recommended motion for approval of the AEC request.
Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of the Alternative Equivalent Compliance application for Lot 22A Block 1
Wildridge Subdivision with the following findings:
Findings:
1. The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.080(f), Development Plan,
§7.16.090(f), Design Review, and §7.16.120 Alternative Equivalent Compliance;
2. The AEC achieves the intent of the roof design standard to the same or better degree than the
subject standard;
3. The AEC achieves the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan to the same or better
degree than the roof design standards, including Policy A.1.5;
4. The AEC results in benefits to the community that are equivalent to compliance with the roof
design standards; and
5. By limiting the height of the building, the AEC imposes no greater impacts on adjacent
properties than would occur through compliance with the specific requirements of the Avon
Development Code.
Motion to Approve the Application:
“I move to approve Case #AEC19001, an application for Alternative Equivalent Compliance for Lot
22A Block 1 Wildridge Subdivision together with the findings of fact outlined by Staff.”
Staff Recommendation for MJR19002 Major Design & Development Plan:
Staff recommends approving the Major Development Plan application for Lot 22A Block 1 Wildridge
Subdivision, with the following findings and conditions:
Findings:
February 19, 2019 PZC Meeting – 2177 Saddle Ridge A
6
1. The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.080(f), Development Plan,
§7.16.090(f), Design Review. The design meets the development and design standards
established in the Avon Municipal Code;
2. The application is complete;
3. The application provides sufficient information to allow the PZC to determine that the
application complies with the relevant review criteria;
4. The application complies with the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan;
5. The demand for public services or infrastructure exceeding current capacity is mitigated by
the application; and
6. The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community.
Conditions:
1. Any irrigated area located on the north side of the property shall be reseeded with native
seed and removed from permanent irrigation; and
2. The spruce tree shall be installed so the crown does not come within ten (10) feet of the house.
Motion to Approve the Application:
“I move to approve Case #MJR19002, an application for Major Design and Development Plan for
Lot 22A Block 1 Wildridge Subdivision together with the findings of fact outlined by Staff.”
Exhibits
A. Design Plans
B. Lighting Plan
C. AEC Alternative Design
Date: 2-4-19
Meeting at TOA RE: Design review 2177 Saddle Ridge Loop, Lot 22A North house
The lot 22 at 2177 Saddle Ridge Loop is being split into 2 single family lots that will result in the lot 22A,
northern most lot, at a size of 12,877.7 s.f. or .286 acres.
During the approved split of the lot the following restrictions were placed on the property.
1 The building footprint will be limited to 2000 s.f.
2 The total livable area of the home shall be limited to 2800 s.f.
3 A building envelope was established at 3300 s.f. in which the building, overhangs, roofs, and
decks are to be kept within. On grade terraces, drives, and walks would be able to extend
beyond the envelope, but not into any non-development area.
4 Non development area was designated to maintain a natural landscape and buffer to the
neighbors.
The home is proposed as a mountain modern design for the property owner’s family of 7. The home is
a 5 bedroom, 4 bath residence with a 2 car garage. The design has the roof planes set to create
interesting interior volumes and capture the commanding views. During the lot split meetings there was
concern of the neighbors of diminishing their easterly views. While protecting their view is not a design
restriction, we feel that it is a concern to address. The presented design addresses their concerns by
working to limit the overall height of the building by roof form and reducing the roof pitch. We will be
applying and seeking approval for an AEC for the ability to provide the home with all 3:12 roof pitches in
lieu of the min roof slope of 4:12 called out in the development code. We feel that this lowered roof
pitch enhances the design, reduces wasted interior volume, lower the height of the building at the street
façade, and reduces the overall building height by 24”. The presented design, with the 3:12 pitched
roofs, creates a maximum building height of 30’-5”, or 4’-7” below the developable right of 35’-0”
maximum building height.
We believe that we have created a handsome home that fits well within the language of the Wildridge
neighborhood and fits the design goals of the owners. We are seeking approval at the next P and Z
meeting on Feb. 19th, 2019 for the building design and the AEC.
The exterior lighting for the home will be accomplished using recessed can lighting within the soffits or
roofs, or cantilevered structures. This shall conform to the Town’s darksky restrictions. Lighting is to
be located in the following location: (3) at the entry terrace, (2) at the cantilever over the garage doors,
and (2) at the back covered terrace.
Thank you,
Jeffrey P Manley AIA
Martin Manley Architects
970-328-1299 (direct)
970-688-0326 (cell)
www.martinmanleyarchitects.com
Attachment A
ZONING INFORMATION-Lot 22A
Lot 22A, Wildridge Subdivision
2177 Saddle Ridge Loop, Avon Colorado
Zoning: Single Family Lot,
Lot 22A Area = .286 acres = 12877.7 s.f.
Maximum Lot Coverage Allowed = 50% of Lot Area 12877.7= 6,438.85 s.f.
Minimum Landscape Area Allowed = 25% of Lot Area 12877.7= 3,219.425 s.f.
Platted Building Envelope = 3300 s.f. (allowed by plat)
Proposed Building Height= 30'-5" (<35'-0" allowed by right)
Proposed Livable Area = 2761.5 s.f. (<2,800 s.f. allowed by plat)
Proposed Garage Area =831.2 s.f.
total =3,592.7 s.f.
Proposed Lot coverage by building/footprint =1,381.4 s.f. (allowed footprint of <2,000 s.f. by plat)
Proposed Impervious area
(Building ) 1,381.4 s.f. + 1,915 s.f. (drive + terraces) =3,296.4s.f.
Proposed Landscape area
(Lot area= 12877.7 s.f.)-(imperv. by footprint 1,381.4 s.f.) = 11,496.3 s.f. Landscape area ( 89.3%)
(Lot area= 12877.7 s.f.)-(imperv. total 3,296.4 s.f.) = 9,581.3 s.f. Landscape area ( 74.4%)
Platted no disturb area = 2,350 s.f.
Parking Requirements: 3 spaces required
Snow Storage: 20 % of 1,464 s.f. Drive = 292.8 s.f. of snow storage (330 s.f. provided)
Exterior Lighting: Dark sky compliant, RECESSED CAN LIGHTING
Roofing:
50-Year (TL) Asphalt shingle
Elk-GAF , Prestique High Def, Charcoal
Flashing, Metal panels, and Gutters:
Paint lock aluminum
Color: to match black
Terraces and Entry patio
saw cut concrete slab
Drive:Asphalt drive
Windows:
Aluminum Clad windows and doors
Color: iron ore
Timbers, and fascia
1x6 and 2x8, Wood Fascia Trim
Color: FLOOD 913 Ebony (200%) semi-transparent
Typical Horizontal Siding: 1X8 ship lapped or T&G
Wood Siding (with 1/4" reveal)
Rough sawn texture
Color: FLOOD 913 Ebony semi-transparent
Typical Vertical Siding: 1X8 ship lapped
Color: Silver City from
Motanta Timber Products, Aquafir
Stone Veneer: Winterhaven, profit Alpine Ledgestone
(from Boral, cultured stone)
drystack, Rectilinear stones,
Horizontal/linear stack
Same stone for wall caps 970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject No.:DateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION2/11/2019 11:27:19 AMA0.0COVER18512177 Saddle Ridge LoopPLANNING AND ZONING SET UPDATE SET2-4-19Single Family Residences atWildridge SubdivisionLot 22A, Avon CO 816202177 Saddle Ridge Loop
PLANNING AND ZONING
SET UPDATE SET
Single Family Residences at
Wildridge Subdivision
Lot 22A, Avon CO 81620
2-4-19
Project Team Information
Owner: 2177 SADDLE RIDGE LOOP LLC
PO BOX 741
AVON, CO 81620-0741
Location: 2177 Saddle Ridge Loop
Lot 22, Block 1,
Wildridge Subdivision
Parcel Number 1943-354-03-011
Architect:Martin Manley Architect
Jeffrey P Manley AIA
PO Box 1587
Eagle, CO 81631
970.328.5151
jeff@martinmanleyarchitects.com
General Contractor:
DW Dantas Construction LLC
Dave Dantas
PO Box 2322
Avon, CO 81620
970.376.6111
dave@dwdantas.com
Parcel Number:1943-354-03-011
Location: 2177 Saddle Ridge Loop,Lot 22, Block 1,
Wildridge Subdivision
Class of Work: New Construction
Type of Construction: Type V-B
Type of Occupancy: R3
Levels: 2-story + basement
Fire Sprinklers: No
Monitored alarm system: Yes
Heating: Forced air
Furnace:Min. 92% efficiency, GAS
2015 International Residential Code (IRC) including Appendix F & G No.DescriptionDate12" = 1'-0"
ZONING SUMMARY- LOT 22A
12" = 1'-0"
COLOR BOARD
Attachment A
UP
DN
WD DW
549.3 SF
Lower Level Area 832.1 SF
Garage
1504 SF
Main Level Area
708.1 SF
Upper Level Area 970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION2/11/2019 11:27:20 AMA0.1AREA CALCULATIONS18512177 Saddle Ridge LoopPLANNING AND ZONING SET UPDATE SET2-4-19Single Family Residences atWildridge SubdivisionLot 22A, Avon CO 81620No.DescriptionDate1/8" = 1'-0"1 A1.0 LOWER LEVEL
1/8" = 1'-0"2 A2.0 MAIN LEVEL
1/8" = 1'-0"3 A3.0 UPPER LEVEL
Area Schedule (Gross Building)
Name Area
Lower Level Area 549.3 SF
Main Level Area 1504 SF
Upper Level Area 708.1 SF
Grand total: 3 2761.5 SF
Area Schedule (Gross garage)
Name Area
Garage 832.1 SF
Grand total: 1 832.1 SF
Attachment A
6.8°
WOOD FENCE
CTV PEDESTAL
TELEPHONE
PEDESTAL
ELECTRIC
TRANSFORMER
SATTELITE
DISH
FLOWLINE OF
18" C.M.P. 8173.9
8187.6
8188.1
8185.2
8182.4
8183.0
8181.0
8180.8
8179.1
8178.9
8177.1
8177.3
8176.1
8175.7
8175.2
8175.9
8176.3
EDGE OF ASPHALT
FLOWLINE OF
DITCH
EDGE OF
ASPHALT
EDGE OF GRAVEL
FOUND No. 5 REBAR
WITH RED PLASTIC CAP
L.S. No. 5447
FOUND No. 5 REBAR
WITH RED PLASTIC CAP
L.S. No. 5447
BUILDING
SETBACK
BUILDING
SETBACK
BUILDING
SETBACK
UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT
(RECEPTION No. 226437)UTI
L
I
TY AND DRAI
NAGE EASEMENT(RECEPTI
ON No. 226437)
U TILITY A N D DR A IN A G E EA SEM EN T(REC EPTIO N N o. 226437)SLOPE MAINTENANCE, DRAINAGE AND
SNO
W STORAGE EASEMENT
(RECEPTION No. 226437)
N 49°37'22"E - 114.02'S89°54'56"E - 210.69'S30°46'55"E - 100.81'
LOT 22
0.57 ACRES
ADDRESS: 2177 SADDLE RIDGE LOOP
LOT 21B
LOT 23
LOT 25B
LOT 25A
S
A
D
D
L
E
R
I
D
GE
L
O
O
P
(
5
0
'
R
I
G
H
T
-O
F
-W
A
Y
)
LOT 24B
LOT 22B
12039.0 S.F.
LOT 22A
12877.7 S.F.
8180
819
0
8200
8
2
0
0
8190
8180
77'-9"
78
79
5%
first20'at
4%
80
84
96
92
96
92
8%
8%
84'-6
3%
3%
90
82'-0
81
81'-6"
94
92
90
88
86
84
84'84'
8%first20'at4%88
86
82'
94
95 81'6'82'390
92
9 0
88
94
94
92
8 6
8 4'
90
86
84
82
78
78
78
92
proposed
drainage
easement
82'84'
81'-6"7'-6"10'-0"
2 5 '-0 "10'-0"10'-0"7'-6"10'-0"22'-73_
8"
22'-51_2"
30'-33_4"
23'-63_
4"
5'-0"5'-0"
VIEWS
BEAVER CREEKMOUNTAINGAME CREEK BOWLRED AND WHITEMOUNTAIN10
1 inch = 10 ft.
( IN FEET )
5
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 10 20
4"
4"
4"
10"
4"
4"
S
C TV
P
(SEE DETAIL)
VIEWPOINT
T.O. WALL
B.O. WALL
2'-0"8182'
8180'
G
U
E
S
T
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
95' 9 BET
W
EEN D
RIVE W
AY C
U
RB C
UTS
SURFACE DRAINAGE TO DITCH28' - 1"27'
-
0"
ROUGHLT 55 FEET BETWEEN BUILDINGS
T.O. WALLB.O. WALL
4'-0"
8194' 8190'
T.O. WALL
B.O. WALL
2'-0"8184'
8182'VI
EW LI
NE DI
STANCE
AROUND CORNER
I
S 165 FEET
(TO SOUTH
)
GRADE IN
THIS AREA
IS LOWERED
TO IMPROVE
SIGHT LINE
TO DRIVE
PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE
ADJACENT HOME CORNER
(20' FROM THIS PROPERTY LINE
view path to Game Creek Bowl
3200 S.F. OF PROPOSED NON DEVELOPEMENT AREA
(MAY HAVE LIMITED DISTURBING TO CONNECT TO UTILIES)
67' - 8"50' - 5"65' - 5 1/2"
65' - 5 1/2"
5 0 ' - 5 "2' - 9"
Total Lot 22
Area: 24916.63 s.f.
Area of no disturbance/natural: 3200 s.f. (undisturbed at back of lot and under south neighbor’s trees)
Lot 22A Lot 22B
Area:12877.7 s.f.Area:12038.5 s.f.
Area of no disturb: 2350 s.f.Area of no disturb: 850 s.f.
Area of no disturbance on lot= 10527.7 s.f.Area of no disturbance on lot= 11188.5 s.f.
Area within envelope: 3300 s.f.Area within envelope: 3300 s.f.
T.O. WALL
B.O. WALL
4'-0"8190'
8186'
T.O. WALLB.O. WALL
2'-6"
8188' 8185' 6 14' - 0"14' - 0 13/16"
SNOW
STORAGE AREA
330 S.F.
SNOW
STORAGE AREA
330 S.F.
SILT FENCIN
G ALO
N
G THE D
O
W
NHILL SIDE
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
FENCING
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
FENCING. SOME
REMOVAL OF SHRUBS
WILL OCCUR OUTSIDE
OF THE FENCE
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
FENCING.
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
FENCING.
SILT FENCING ALONG THE DOWNHILL SIDE 5' - 4 3/16"18" DIA x30'
LONG CULVERT
18" DIA x30' LONG
CULVERT
ZONING INFORMATION-Lot 22A
Lot 22A, Wildridge Subdivision
2177 Saddle Ridge Loop, Avon Colorado
Zoning: Single Family Lot,
Lot 22A Area = .286 acres = 12877.7 s.f.
Maximum Lot Coverage Allowed = 50% of Lot Area 12877.7= 6,438.85 s.f.
Minimum Landscape Area Allowed = 25% of Lot Area 12877.7= 3,219.425 s.f.
Platted Building Envelope = 3300 s.f. (allowed by plat)
Proposed Building Height= 30'-5" (<35'-0" allowed by right)
Proposed Livable Area = 2761.5 s.f. (<2,800 s.f. allowed by plat)
Proposed Garage Area =831.2 s.f.
total =3,592.7 s.f.
Proposed Lot coverage by building/footprint =1,381.4 s.f. (allowed footprint of <2,000 s.f. by plat)
Proposed Impervious area
(Building ) 1,381.4 s.f. + 1,915 s.f. (drive + terraces) =3,296.4s.f.
Proposed Landscape area
(Lot area= 12877.7 s.f.)-(imperv. by footprint 1,381.4 s.f.) = 11,496.3 s.f. Landscape area ( 89.3%)
(Lot area= 12877.7 s.f.)-(imperv. total 3,296.4 s.f.) = 9,581.3 s.f. Landscape area ( 74.4%)
Platted no disturb area = 2,350 s.f.
Parking Requirements: 3 spaces required
Snow Storage: 20 % of 1,464 s.f. Drive = 292.8 s.f. of snow storage (330 s.f. provided)
Exterior Lighting: Dark sky compliant, RECESSED CAN LIGHTING
ZONING INFORMATION-Lot 22B
Lot 22B, Wildridge Subdivision
2177 Saddle Ridge Loop, Avon Colorado
Zoning: Single Family Lot,
Lot 22B Area = .276 acres = 12,038.5 s.f.
Maximum Lot Coverage Allowed = 50% of Lot Area 12,038.5= 6,019.25 s.f.
Minimum Landscape Area Allowed = 25% of Lot Area 12,038.5= 3,009.625 s.f.
Platted Building Envelope = 3300 s.f. (allowed by plat)
Proposed Building Height= 30'-3" (<35'-0" allowed by right)
Proposed Livable Area = 2798.8 s.f. (<2,800 s.f. allowed by plat)
Proposed Garage Area =1,006.9 s.f.
total =3,805.7 s.f.
Proposed Lot coverage by building/footprint =1,645.4 s.f. (allowed footprint of <2,000 s.f. by plat)
Proposed Impervious area
(Building ) 1,645.4 s.f. + 1,933 s.f. (drive + terraces) = 3,578.4 s.f.
Proposed Landscape area
(Lot area= 12,038.5 s.f.)-(imperv. by footprint 1,645.4 s.f.) = 10,393.1 s.f. Landscape area ( 86.3%)
(Lot area= 12,038.5 s.f.)-(imperv. total 3,578.4 s.f.) = 8,460.1s.f. Landscape area ( 70.3%)
Platted no disturb area = 850 s.f.
Parking Requirements: 3 spaces required
Snow Storage: 20 % of 1,593 s.f. Drive = 318.6 s.f. of snow storage (330 s.f. provided)
Exterior Lighting: Dark sky compliant, RECESSED CAN LIGHTING
970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION2/11/2019 11:27:22 AMA1.1SITE PLAN18512177 Saddle Ridge LoopPLANNING AND ZONING SET UPDATE SET2-4-19Single Family Residences atWildridge SubdivisionLot 22A, Avon CO 81620No.DescriptionDate1" = 10'-0"1 A0.0 SITE PLAN
12" = 1'-0"
ZONING SUMMARY- LOT 22A
12" = 1'-0"
ZONING SUMMARY- LOT 22B
Attachment A
6.8°WOOD FENCE
CTV PEDESTAL
TELEPHONE
PEDESTAL
ELECTRIC
TRANSFORMER
SATTELITE
DISH
FLOWLINE OF
18" C.M.P. 8173.9
SEWER MANHOLE MH 520
RIM ELEVATION = 8184.8
INVERT (N) ELEVATION = 8179.0
INVERT (S) ELEVATION = 8178.8
FLOWLINE OF
DITCH
EDGE OF
ASPHALT
EDGE OF GRAVEL
FOUND No. 5 REBAR
WITH RED PLASTIC CAP
L.S. No. 5447
FOUND No. 5 REBAR
WITH RED PLASTIC CAP
L.S. No. 5447
BUILDING
SETBACK
BUILDING
SETBACK
BUILDING
SETBACK
UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT
(RECEPTION No. 226437)UTI
LI
TY AND DRAI
NAGE EASEMENT(RECEPTI
ON No. 226437)
U TILITY A N D DR A IN A G E EA SEM EN T(REC EPTIO N N o. 226437)SLOPE MAINTENAN
CE, DRAINAGE AND
SNOW STORAGE EASEMENT
(RECEPTION No. 226437)
N 49°37'22"E - 114.02'S89°54'56"E - 210.69'S30°46'55"E - 100.81'
LOT 22
0.57 ACRES
ADDRESS: 2177 SADDLE RIDGE LOOP
LOT 21B
LOT 23
LOT 25B
LOT 25A
LOT 24B
LOT 22B
12039.0 S.F.
LOT 22A
12877.7 S.F.
8180
819
0
8200
8
2
0
0
8190
8180
77'-9"
78
79
5%
first20'at
4%
80
84
96
92
96
92
8%
8%
84'-6
3%
3%
90
82'-0
81
81'-6"
94
92
90
88
86
84
84'84'
8%first20'at4%88
86
82'
94
95 81'6'82'390
92
9 0
88
94
94
92
8 6
8 4'
90
86
84
82
78
78
78
92
proposed
drainage
easement
82'84'
81'-6"
10
1 inch = 10 ft.
( IN FEET )
5
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 10 20
4"
4"
4"
10"
4"
4"
S
C TV
P
(SEE DETAIL)
VIEWPOINT
Landscape and Irrigation table
AREA MATRIX:
ZONING INFORMATION-Lot 22A
Lot 22A Area = .286 acres = 12877.7 s.f.
Maximum Lot Coverage Allowed = 50% of Lot Area 12877.7= 6,438.85 s.f.
Minimum Landscape Area Allowed = 25% of Lot Area 12877.7= 3,219.425 s.f.
Platted Building Envelope = 3300 s.f. (allowed by plat)
Proposed Livable Area = 2761.5 s.f. (<2,800 s.f. allowed by plat)
Proposed Garage Area =831.2 s.f.
total =3,592.7 s.f.
Proposed Lot coverage by building/footprint =1,381.4 s.f. (allowed footprint of <2,000 s.f. by plat)
Proposed Impervious area
(Building ) 1,381.4 s.f. + 1,915 s.f. (drive + terraces) =3,296.4s.f.
Proposed Landscape area
(Lot area= 12877.7 s.f.)-(imperv. by footprint 1,381.4 s.f.) = 11,496.3 s.f. Landscape area ( 89.3%)
(Lot area= 12877.7 s.f.)-(imperv. total 3,296.4 s.f.) = 9,581.3 s.f. Landscape area ( 74.4%)
Platted no disturb area = 2,350 s.f.
Proposed Temp Irrigation only in reveg. seeded areas.
Temp irrigation to be removed after establiment of seeded areas.
Landscape Units = 9,581.3 s.f. -2,350 s.f. of undisturbed area=7,231.3 / 50 s.f. per unit =144.6 units
25% Landscape Units to be provided be trees = 25% of 144.6 units =36.16 units by trees
Landscape Material (trees)New Existing retained Units
Deciduous 1.5" -2.5" caliper/clump = 4 units per tree X 7=28 4 units per tree X 0 =0 28 units
Deciduous 2.5" -4" caliper/clump = 7 units per tree X 5=35 9 units per tree X 0 =0 35 units
Evergreen 6'-8' high =6 units per tree X 1 =6 11 units per tree X 0=11 6 units
Landscape Material (shrubs)New Existing retained Units
Shrubs, 5 gallon = 1 unit per shrub X 20 =20 1.2 units per shrub X 0 =0 20 units
Perennial Ground covers Units
1 unit per 400 s.f. 400 s.f. proposed / 400 s.f.=1 units 1 units
Hardscape Material Units Awarded calculation Units
Shredded Bark (mulch at planting beds around trees)1/500 s.f. 500 s.f. planting bed area/500 =1 1 Units
subtotal 91 units
Retained Existing Vegetation Mass Bonus Landscape Units Awarded
300+ square feet of native Vegetation 10%
Proposed Undisturbed Native vegetation Area = 900 s.f.< 300 s.f. Bonus to be applied
10 % of 91 units = 9.1 9.1 units
subtotal 100.1 units
Drip Irrigation Bonus Landscape Units Awarded
80% or more of total landscaped area on temporary irrigation 50%
50 % of 100.1 units = 50.05 Bonus to be applied 50.05units
Total Landscape Units Proposed (144.6 required)150.15 units
NOTE: TREES WITHIN UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE NOT COUNTED IN UNIT TOTAL
G
U
E
S
T
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
S U R F A C E D R A IN A G E T O D IT C H
PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE
ADJACENT HOME CORNER
(20' FROM THIS PROPERTY LINE
view path to Game Creek Bowl
3200 S.F. OF PROPOSED
NON DEVELOPEMENT AREA
(MAY HAVE LIMITED
DISTURBING TO CONNECT
TO UTILIES)14' - 0"14' - 0 13/16"
GROUND
COVER.
CS
QA 2
QA 2
QA 2
QA 2
QA 2
QA
QA
QA
QA
QA
QA QASP
SP
SP
SP SPLL
LL
LL LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
C E
C ECE
C ECE
MULCH
MULCH
SILT FENCIN
G ALO
N
G THE D
O
W
NHILL SIDE
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
FENCING
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
FENCING. SOME
REMOVAL OF SHRUBS
WILL OCCUR OUTSIDE
OF THE FENCE
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
FENCING.
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
FENCING.
SILT FENCING ALONG THE DOWNHILL SIDE 5' - 4 3/16"NOTE:
LARGE EVERGREE TREES EXI
ST ON NEI
GHBORS PROPERTY
I
N THI
S AREA,THE GOAL OF THE LARGE ASPEN AND 2 SMALLER ASPEN TREES
I
S TO BE TUCKED OUT OF NEI
GHBOR VI
EW PATHS.
CONTRACTOR SHALL REVI
EW HE PLACEMENT OF THESE 3 TREES.
LINE OF ROOF OVERHANG LINE OF ROOF OVERHANGCS
Q A 2
Q A
Q A
Q A
QA
SP
SP
SP
SP SPL L
L L
L L
L L
C E
C E
C E
C E
C E
L L
L L
L L
L L
L L L L
C E
C E
Q A 2
Q A 2
Q A 2
Q A 2
QA
QA
QA
GROUND
COVER.
18" DIA x30'
LONG CULVERT
18" DIA x30' LONG
CULVERT
QA
Deciduous Trees
Count
QUAKING ASPEN
(POPULUS TREMULOIDES)
1.5" to 2.5" CAL.
Size
7
12
Symbol Name
Deciduous Shrubs
LL DWARF KOREAN LILAC
(SYRINGA MEYERI 'PALABIN')
OR Fendler ceanothus, mountain-lilac
#5 10
20
CE #5 5COTONEASTER DAMMERI CORAL BEAUTY
(COTONEASTER DAMMERI)
GC
Perennial Ground covers
400 square feet of cover.
CS
Conifer Trees
6'-8' tall 1
1
Colorado Spruce
(Picea pungens)
Mulched Areas
SHREDDED BARK MULCHED AREA -AROUND
TREES AND SHRUBS NOT COVERED BY GROUND
COVER
Natural Grass Areas (reveg)
SOD MIX OF GRASSES AND FESCUE SEED.
ARKANSAS VALLEY SEED COMPANY, NATIVE LOW
GROW MOUNTAIN MIX.SOD AREA TO BE 800 S.F.,
OTHER AREAS ARE TO SPRAYED WITH A
FERTILIZER AND SEED MIX.
MULCH
NG Spray Irrigation in sod areas
that will become mowed lawn,
temp drip irrigation in areas to
become more natural
MULCH
NATURAL GRASS AREA
(SODDED)IRRIGATION NOTE:
1 ALL RESEEDED AREAS ARE TO TEMPORARY DRIP IRRIGATION, REMOVE IRRIGATION AT ESTABLISHMENT
2 SODDED AREA IS TO HAVE RAIN BIRD POP-UP SPRAY IRRIGATION
3 THE GROUND COVER AND PLANTING BEDS ARE TO RECIEVE PERMANENT
MICRO SPRAY AND DRIP IRRIGATION
TOTAL OF PERMANENT DRIP AND SPRAY IRRIGATION AREA OF 1,200 S.F.
SNOW IN SUMMER, STONECROP, CREEPING
PHLOX, NATIVE LOW -GROW GRASSES, ROCKY
MTN. FESCUE
500 square feet of cover.
Q ACS
LLS P
C E
#5SP 5SPIREA, ANTHONY WATERER
(Spiraea japonica ‘Anthony Waterer’)
5000 square feet of SPRAY SEED cover. and 800 of SOD
2.5" to 4" CAL.5
Q A 2QA2 QUAKING ASPEN
(POPULUS TREMULOIDES)
GROUND COVER
Use of sod will be reviewed with budget as project progresses. Area will become
spray seeded and temp irrigation if budget does not allow for sod.970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION2/11/2019 11:27:26 AMA1.2LANDSCAPE PLAN 22A18512177 Saddle Ridge LoopPLANNING AND ZONING SET UPDATE SET2-4-19Single Family Residences atWildridge SubdivisionLot 22A, Avon CO 81620No.DescriptionDate12" = 1'-0"
LANDSCAPE UNITS - LOT 22A
1" = 10'-0"1 A0.0 LANDSCAPE PLAN- LOT 22A
1/8" = 1'-0"
LANDSCAPE LEGEND - LOT 22A
Attachment A
2 5 ' - 0 ".34' - 6 3/16"VIEW TO RED AND WHITEVIEW TO
GAME CREEK
8196'
elev at cornerLetter of supportL e tte r o f s u p p o rtMAIN LEVEL
8207' elev
EYE LEVEL
8212' elev
MAIN LEVEL
8209' elev
EYE LEVEL
8214' elev
LARGE
EVERGREEN
TREES 25' TALL
V I E W C O R R I D O R (S K Y T O V A L L E Y F L O O R )
P R O V I D E D W I T H L O T S P L I T T H A T W O U L D
N O T E X I S T W I T H D U P L E X
S U P P O R T A T 1 S T M T G
970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION2/10/2019 7:35:22 PMA1.1.6Unnamed18512177 Saddle Ridge LoopPLANNING AND ZONING SET UPDATE SET2-4-19Single Family Residences atWildridge SubdivisionLot 22, Avon CO 81620No.DescriptionDate1" = 20'-0"1
A0.0 SITE PLAN GOOGLE EARTH view
from neighbor study
VIEWS BETWEEN OR
AROUND THE HOMES
ARE IMPROVED WITH
THE 2 SINGLE FAMILY
HOMES OVER THE
DUPLEX
THE MAIN RIDGES IN
THE CURRENT DESIGN
ARE PARALLEL TO THE
VIEW. DUPLEX MASS
CREATES A LONG
RIDGE
PERPENDICULAR
THE HOMES ARE
BROKEN UP AND ARE
ABLE TO HAVE MORE
BACK YARD. THIS
INCREASES THE
DISTANCE TO THE
NEIGHBORS TO THE
WEST
Attachment A
6.8°
WOOD FENCE
CTV PEDESTAL
TELEPHONE
PEDESTAL
ELECTRIC
TRANSFORMER
SATTELITE
DISH
FLOWLINE OF
18" C.M.P. 8173.9
SEWER MANHOLE MH 520
RIM ELEVATION = 8184.8
INVERT (N) ELEVATION = 8179.0
INVERT (S) ELEVATION = 8178.8EDGE OF
ASPHALT
EDGE OF GRAVEL
FOUND No. 5 REBAR
WITH RED PLASTIC CAP
L.S. No. 5447
FOUND No. 5 REBAR
WITH RED PLASTIC CAP
L.S. No. 5447
BUILDING
SETBACK
BUILDING
SETBACK
BUILDING
SETBACK
UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT
(RECEPTION No. 226437)UTI
L
I
TY AND DRAI
NAGE EASEMENT(RECEPTI
ON No. 226437)
U TILITY A N D D RA IN A GE EA SEM EN T(REC EPTIO N N o. 226437)SLOPE MAINTENANCE, DRAINAGE AND
SNOW STORAGE EASEMENT
(RECEPTION No. 226437)
N 49°37'22"E - 114.02'S89°54'56"E - 210.69'S30°46'55"E - 100.81'
LOT 22
0.57 ACRES
ADDRESS: 2177 SADDLE RIDGE LOOP
LOT 21B
LOT 23
OT 25B
LOT 25A
LOT 24B
LOT 22B
12039.0 S.F.
LOT 22A
12877.7 S.F.
8180
819
0
8200
8
2
0
0
8190
8180
77'-9"
78
79
5%
first20'at
4%
80
84
96
92
96
92
8%
8%
84'-6
3%
3%
90
82'-0
81
81'-6"
94
92
90
88
86
84
84'84'
8%first20'at4%88
86
82'
94
95 81'6'82'390
92
9 0
88
94
94
92
8 6
8 4'
90
86
84
82
78
78
78
92
proposed
drainage
easement
82'84'
81'-6"
10
1 inch = 10 ft.
( IN FEET )
5
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 10 20
4"
4"
4"
10"
4"
4"
S
C TV
P
(SEE DETAIL)
VIEWPOINT
G
U
E
S
T
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
S U R F A C E D R A IN A G E T O D IT C H
PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE
ADJACENT HOME CORNER
(20' FROM THIS PROPERTY LINE
view path to Game Creek Bowl
3200 S.F. OF PROPOSED
NON DEVELOPEMENT AREA
(MAY HAVE LIMITED
DISTURBING TO CONNECT
TO UTILIES)
GROUND
COVER.
CS
QA 2
QA 2
QA 2
QA 2
QA 2
QA
QA
QA
QA
QA
QA QASP
SP
SP
SP SPLL
LL
LL LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
C E
C ECE
C ECE
MULCH
MULCH
SILT FENCIN
G ALO
N
G THE D
O
W
NHILL SIDE
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
FENCING
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
FENCING. SOME
REMOVAL OF SHRUBS
WILL OCCUR OUTSIDE
OF THE FENCE
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
FENCING.
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
FENCING.
SILT FENCING ALONG THE DOWNHILL SIDE 5' - 4 3/16"NOTE:
LARGE EVERGREE TREES EXI
ST ON NEI
GHBORS PROPERTY
I
N THI
S AREA,THE GOAL OF THE LARGE ASPEN AND 2 SMALLER ASPEN TREES
I
S TO BE TUCKED OUT OF NEI
GHBOR VI
EW PATHS.
CONTRACTOR SHALL REVI
EW HE PLACEMENT OF THESE 3 TREES.
LINE OF ROOF OVERHANG LINE OF ROOF OVERHANGCS
Q A 2
Q A
Q A
Q A
QA
SP
SP
SP
SP SPL L
L L
L L
L L
C E
C E
C E
C E
C E
L L
L L
L L
L L
L L L L
C E
C E
Q A 2
Q A 2
Q A 2
Q A 2
QA
QA
QA
GROUND
COVER.
AC C
O
NTR
OLLER
back flow valve
manual shut-off
valve
VALVE ASSE
M
BLY
Sensor stake in ground
to read soil moisture
contentAC CONTROLLERback flow valvemanual shut-off valveVALVE ASSEMBLYSensor stake in ground to read soil moisture contentTHE IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE DESIGNED BY THE
LANDSCAPE SUBCONTRACTOR.
The design shall:
(A) Prevent runoff, low head drainage, overspray, or other
similar conditions where irrigation water flows onto non-
targeted areas, such as adjacent property, non-irrigated areas,
hardscapes, roadways, or structures. Restrictions regarding
overspray and runoff may be modified if the landscape area is
adjacent to permeable surfacing and no runoff occurs or if the
adjacent non-permeable surfaces are designed and
constructed to drain entirely to landscaping.
(B) Conform to the hydrozones of the landscape design plan.
(C) Have matched precipitation rates within a hydrozone,
unless otherwise directed by the manufacturer's
recommendations.
(D) Meet the required operating pressure of the emission
devices using valve pressure regulators, sprinkler head
pressure regulators, inline pressure regulators, booster
pumps, or other devices. The pressure and flow
measurements identified at the design stage will be verified
prior to the installation of the system.
(E) Meet the requirements set in the American National
Standards Institute (ANSI) standard, ASABE/ICC 802-2014
"Landscape Irrigation Sprinkler and Emitter Standard authored
by the American Society of Agricultural and Biological
Engineers and the International Code Council and verified by
an independent third-party.
(F) Achieve the highest possible sprinkler spacing distribution
uniformity using the manufacturer's recommendations. All
sprinkler head installed in the turfgrass areas shall have a
distribution uniformity of 0.65 or higher using the protocol
defined in ASABE/ICC 802-2014 standard.
22A IRRIGATION NOTE:
1 ALL RESEEDED AREAS ARE TO TEMPORARY DRIP IRRIGATION
2 THE GROUND COVER AND PLANTING BEDS ARE TO RECIEVE PERMANENT
MICRO SPRAY AND DRIP IRRIGATION
3 ALL TEMPORARY IRRIGATION SHALL BE INSTALLED ABOVE GROUND AND PHYSICALLY REMOVED
AFTER 2 GROWING SEASONS OR AFTER PLANT ESTABLISHMENT, WHICHEVER COMES FIRST.
TOTAL OF PERMANENT DRIP AND MICRO SPRAY IRRIGATION AREA OF 1,700 S.F.
22A, NORTH HOUSE
Minimum Landscape Area Allowed = 25% of Lot Area 12877.7= 3,219.425 s.f.
Proposed Landscape area
(Lot area= 12877.7 s.f.)-(imperv. total 3,296.4 s.f.) = 9,581.3 s.f. Landscape area ( 74.4%)
Landscapre area 9,581.3 s.f. -2,350 s.f. of undisturbed area=7,231.3 s.f. of disturbed
Total irrigated area
1,700 s.f. (17.7% of the total landscape area)
Total Permanent Drip irrigation =500 s.f. (29% of irrigation total)
*at trees provide 1 gallon per hour, 3 times a week
* shrubs provide 1 gallon per hour, 3 times a week
Total Permanent micro spray irrigation =400 s.f. (23.5% of irrigation total)
*at planting beds and ground covers place mirco spray at
8'-0" spacing. 1/2 gallon per minute, 3 times a week
Total Permanent pop-up spray irrigation =800 s.f. (47% of irrigation total)
* at sodded mountain mix, water at volumes as recommented by the
'Water Wise residential guide for Western Colorado' 3 times a week
Total irrigated landscape area = 7,231.3 s.f.
Total permanent irrigation =1,700.0 s.f.
Total Temporary irrigation =5,531.3 s.f.+non irrigated 2,350 s.f.=(82.4 % of total landscape area)
Permanent drip irrigation at aspen trees and planting beds 500 s.f.
Permanent micro spray irrigation ground cover planting beds 400 s.f.
Use the following table as a guideline for how long to run your drip system (Note: watering
times are based on using 1.0 GPH Emitters):
Permanent pop up rain bird spray irrigation sodded turf 800 s.f.
22B IRRIGATION NOTE:
1 ALL RESEEDED AREAS ARE TO TEMPORARY DRIP IRRIGATION
2 THE GROUND COVER AND PLANTING BEDS ARE TO RECIEVE PERMANENT
MICRO SPRAY AND DRIP IRRIGATION
3 ALL TEMPORARY IRRIGATION SHALL BE INSTALLED ABOVE GROUND AND PHYSICALLY REMOVED
AFTER 2 GROWING SEASONS OR AFTER PLANT ESTABLISHMENT, WHICHEVER COMES FIRST.
TOTAL OF PERMANENT DRIP AND MICRO SPRAY IRRIGATION AREA OF 900 S.F.
22B, SOUTH HOUSE
Minimum Landscape Area Allowed = 25% of Lot Area 12038.5= 3,009.625 s.f.
Proposed Landscape area
(Lot area= 12038.5s.f.)-(imperv. total 3,578.4 s.f.) = 8460.1s.f. Landscape area ( 74.4%)
Landscapre area 8460.1s.f. -850 s.f. of undisturbed area=7,610.9 s.f. of disturbed
Total irrigated area
900 s.f. (11.8% of the total landscape area)
Total Permanent Drip irrigation =500 s.f. (29% of irrigation total)
*at trees provide 1 gallon per hour, 3 times a week
* shrubs provide 1 gallon per hour, 3 times a week
Total Permanent micro spray irrigation =400 s.f. (23.5% of irrigation total)
*at planting beds and ground covers place mirco spray at
8'-0" spacing. 1/2 gallon per minute, 3 times a week
Water at volumes as recommented by the
'Water Wise residential guide for Western Colorado' 3 times a week
Total irrigated landscape area = 7,610.9 s.f.
Total permanent irrigation =900 s.f.
Total Temporary irrigation =6,710.9 s.f.+non irrigated 850 s.f.=(89.4 % of total landscape area)
Permanent drip irrigation at aspen trees and planting beds 500 s.f.
Permanent micro spray irrigation ground cover planting beds 400 s.f.970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION2/11/2019 11:27:28 AMA1.2.1IRRIGATION PLAN18512177 Saddle Ridge LoopPLANNING AND ZONING SET UPDATE SET2-4-19Single Family Residences atWildridge SubdivisionLot 22A, Avon CO 81620No.DescriptionDate1" = 10'-0"1 A0.0 IRRIGATION PLAN- LOT 22A
12" = 1'-0"
IRRIGATION NOTES Attachment A
6.8°
WOOD FENCE
CTV PEDESTAL
TELEPHONE
PEDESTAL
ELECTRIC
TRANSFORMER
SATTELITE
DISH
FLOWLINE OF
18" C.M.P. 8173.9
8187.6
8188.1
8185.2
8182.4
8183.0
8181.0
8180.8
8179.1
8178.9
8177.1
8177.3
8176.1
8175.7
8175.2
8175.9
8176.3
EDGE OF ASPHALT
FLOWLINE OF
DITCH
EDGE OF
ASPHALT
EDGE OF GRAVEL
FOUND No. 5 REBAR
WITH RED PLASTIC CAP
L.S. No. 5447
FOUND No. 5 REBAR
WITH RED PLASTIC CAP
L.S. No. 5447
BUILDING
SETBACK
BUILDING
SETBACK
BUILDING
SETBACK
UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT
(RECEPTION No. 226437)UTI
L
I
TY AND DRAI
NAGE EASEMENT(RECEPTI
ON No. 226437)
U TILITY A N D D RA IN A GE EA SEM EN T(R EC EPTIO N N o. 226437)SLOPE MAINTENANCE, DRAINAGE AND
SNO
W STORAGE EASEMENT
(RECEPTION No. 226437)
N 49°37'22"E - 114.02'S89°54'56"E - 210.69'S30°46'55"E - 100.81'
LOT 22
0.57 ACRES
ADDRESS: 2177 SADDLE RIDGE LOOP
LOT 21B
LOT 23
LOT 25B
LOT 25A
S
A
D
D
L
E
R
I
D
GE
L
O
O
P
(
5
0
'
R
I
G
H
T
-O
F
-W
A
Y
)
LOT 24B
LOT 22B
12039.0 S.F.
LOT 22A
12877.7 S.F.
8180
819
0
8200
8
2
0
0
8190
8180
77'-9"
VIEWS
BEAVER CREEKMOUNTAINGAME CREEK BOWLRED AND WHITEMOUNTAIN10
1 inch = 10 ft.
( IN FEET )
5
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 10 20
4"
4"
4"
10"
4"
4"
S
C TV
P
GAS METER
GAS METERELEC/METER CLOSET
ELEC/METER CLOSET
E L E C
E L E C ELEC ELECE L E C
E L E C
ELECSEWERGASSEWERGASSEWERGASSE
W
ER
GAS
SEWERGASSEWERGASSEWER
GAS
SEWER
GAS
C A B L E A N D T E L E
C A B L E A N D T E L E
C A B L E A N D T E L E
C A B L E A N D T E L E CABLE AND TELECABLE AND TELE
SOIL STOCKPILE
SOIL STOCKPILE
DUMPSTER
DU
M
P
STER
MATERIAL STORAGE IN
GARAGE AND IN
DRIVEWAY
MATERIAL STORAGE IN
GARAGE AND IN
DRIVEWAY
C
O
NSTR
U
CTIO
N PARKIN
G O
N R
O
AD
C
O
NSTR
U
CTIO
N PARKIN
G O
N R
O
AD
JOB SIGN
C
O
NSTR
U
CTIO
N
TOIL
E
T
SILT FENCIN
G ALO
N
G THE D
O
W
NHILL SIDE
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
FENCING
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
FENCING. SOME
REMOVAL OF SHRUBS
WILL OCCUR OUTSIDE
OF THE FENCE
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
FENCING.
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
FENCING.
SILT FENCING ALONG THE DOWNHILL SIDE 5' - 4 3/16"3200 S.F. OF PROPOSED NON DEVELOPMENT AREA
(MAY HAVE LIMITED DISTURBING TO CONNECT TO UTILITIES)
G
RADIN
G AN
D D
RIVE AC
CESS IM
PR
O
VE
M
ENTS
O
UTSIDE PR
O
PERTY LINE ARE SUBJECT TO A
RIG
HT-OF-W
AY PER
MIT
D
U
RIN
G C
O
NSTR
U
CTIO
N PR
O
VIDE A 6" DEEP x 12'
WIDE x A LEN
GTH OF 20' G
RAVEL TRACKIN
G PA
D
AT THE AC
CESS P
OINT TO THE SITE
18" DIA x30'
LONG CULVERT
18" DIA x30' LONG
CULVERT
W
ATER
W
ATER 970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION2/11/2019 11:27:28 AMA1.4CONSTRUCTION MGMT18512177 Saddle Ridge LoopPLANNING AND ZONING SET UPDATE SET2-4-19Single Family Residences atWildridge SubdivisionLot 22A, Avon CO 81620No.DescriptionDate1" = 10'-0"1 CONSTRUCTION MGMT
NOTE:
1. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR WILL APPLY AND COMPLETE
THE CONNECTION APPLICATION ON THE ERW&SD WEBSITE
BEFORE CONSTRUCTION COMENCES
2. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE THE WATER
AND SEWER LINES WITH ERW&SD PRIOR TO EXCAVATION
Attachment A
UP
WD DW
B U ILDIN GSETB A C KUTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT(RECEPTION No. 226437)N49°37'22"E - 114.02'L O T 2 1 B
8 1 8 0
8 1 9 084
928%3%8181'-6"929088868492proposed
drainage
easement82'
84'81'-6"7'-6"
10'-0"
22'-5 1_
2 "
2 3 '-6 3_
4 "
5'-0"5'-0"
4"
4"(SEE DETA IL)VIEW POINT13' - 6"9' - 6"25' - 0"13' - 4"10' - 3"12' - 9"26' - 8 1/2"cubbies under stair
open railing
STAIR AND LIGHT WELL
4' - 0"7' - 9 1/2"9' - 7 1/2"26' - 8 1/2"11' - 11"
8182' - 6"
6' - 4 1/2"
3' - 0 1/2"18' - 0"3' - 0 1/2"3' - 4"2' - 10"3' - 6"10' - 4 1/2"5' - 10"8182' - 0"
KIDS
BEDROOM 3
BATH
MUDROOM
MECHANICAL
2 CAR
GARAGE
8182' - 6"
8182' - 3 1/4"
LOW UNDER
STAIR STORAGE
METER CLOSET
4' - 9"45' - 5 1/2"
3' - 2"13' - 2 1/2"10' - 3 1/2"18' - 9 1/2"36' - 4"8' - 8 1/2"14' - 9"24' - 6"13' - 2 1/2"16' - 0"4' - 4"4' - 6"4' - 4"2' - 0 1/2"
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BATH
MASTER
CLOSET
LIVING ROOM
STAIR AND LIGHT WELL
UP
DN
DEN/OFFICE
DINING
AT GRADE
TERRACE8' - 1 1/2"12' - 3 1/2"12' - 9"4' - 6"5' - 4"3' - 1 1/2"15' - 2 1/2"6' - 3"6' - 0 1/2"14' - 6 1/2"10' - 9"11' - 8 1/2"7' - 8"4' - 8"MICROKITCHEN 7' - 3"5' - 6"2' - 3"3' - 0"2' - 3"2' - 3"3' - 0"coffe bar4' - 0 1/2"3' - 7"13' - 6"PANTRY6' - 6"5' - 7 1/2"3' - 6"3' - 2"42" REF36" RANGE7' - 9 1/2"2' - 1"3' - 0"3' - 0"
3' - 0"
LAUNDRY
PWDR
23' - 5 1/2"
15' - 2 1/2"
8192' - 7 3/4"
3' - 7"14' - 6 3/4"1' - 3"
7' - 6"
24' - 1 11/16"17' - 2 3/16"14' - 4"2' - 10 1/2"11' - 0 1/2"2' - 10 1/2"14' - 4"
STAIR AND LIGHT WELL
DN STUDY LOFT
KIDS
BEDROOM 1
KIDS
BEDROOM 2
8' - 11"8' - 1 1/2"13' - 2 1/2"14' - 3 1/2"12' - 3 1/2"7' - 8"A3.1
A3.0
A3.12
A3.1
1
1
3
8216' - 9"
EXISTING GRADE:8186'-9"
RIDGE ELEVATION:
RIDGE HT: 30'-0"
3:12
3:12
3:12
3:123:12
3:12EXISTING GRADE:8188'-0"
RIDGE ELEVATION:
RIDGE HT: 30'-5 "
8218' - 5"
EXISTING GRADE:8188'-0"
RIDGE ELEVATION:
RIDGE HT: 28'-9 3/4"
8216' - 9 3/4"
8211' - 10"
EXISTING GRADE:8184'-6"
NEW GRADE: 8182'-5"
RIDGE ELEVATION:
RIDGE HT: 29'-5"
8209' - 0"
EXISTING GRADE:8183'-6"
NEW GRADE: 8182'-1"
RIDGE ELEVATION:
RIDGE HT: 26'-11"
EXISTING GRADE:8186'-2"
NEW GRADE: 8181'-10"
EAVE ELEVATION:
EAVE HT: 22'-7 1/2"
8204' - 5 1/2"
EXISTING GRADE:8190'-6"
NEW GRADE: 8191'-0"
EAVE ELEVATION:
EAVE HT: 21'-11 5/8"
8212' - 3 5/8"
EXISTING GRADE:8193'-0"
NEW GRADE: 8192'-6 1/2"
EAVE ELEVATION:
EAVE HT: 20'-1 1/8"
8212' - 7 5/8"970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION2/11/2019 11:27:30 AMA2.0FLOOR PLANS18512177 Saddle Ridge LoopPLANNING AND ZONING SET UPDATE SET2-4-19Single Family Residences atWildridge SubdivisionLot 22A, Avon CO 81620True
North
Project
North No.DescriptionDate1/4" = 1'-0"1 A1.0 LOWER LEVEL
1/4" = 1'-0"2 A2.0 MAIN LEVEL
True
North
Project
North
1/4" = 1'-0"3 A3.0 UPPER LEVEL
True
North
Project
North
Area Schedule (Gross Building)
Name Area
Lower Level Area 549.3 SF
Main Level Area 1504 SF
Upper Level Area 708.1 SF
Grand total: 3 2761.5 SF
1/8" = 1'-0"4 ROOF PLAN
Attachment A
A2.0 MAIN LEVEL
8192' -7 3/4"
A3.0 UPPER LEVEL
8202' -11"
Plate Height
8211' -6"
A1.0 LOWER
LEVEL
8182' -6"10' - 1 3/4"10' - 3 1/4"8' - 7"MASTER BATH
PLATE HT
8200' -8 7/8"
LIVING ROOM
PLATE HEIGHT
8203' -9 3/4"8' - 1 1/8"11' - 2"3' - 6"3' - 6"970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION2/11/2019 11:27:34 AMA3.0EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS18512177 Saddle Ridge LoopPLANNING AND ZONING SET UPDATE SET2-4-19Single Family Residences atWildridge SubdivisionLot 22A, Avon CO 81620No.DescriptionDate1/4" = 1'-0"1 EAST ELEVATION
2 3D View 1 3 3D View 2
Attachment A
A2.0 MAIN LEVEL
8192' -7 3/4"
A3.0 UPPER LEVEL
8202' -11"
Plate Height
8211' -6"
A1.0 LOWER
LEVEL
8182' -6"
MASTER BATH
PLATE HT
8200' -8 7/8"
LIVING ROOM
PLATE HEIGHT
8203' -9 3/4"
1x8 SHIP LAP SIDING WITH DARK FINISH
ON R-5 ZIP PANEL ON 2X6 WOOD STUDS WITH
R-23 BIBS INSUALTION IN CAVITY
1x8 SHIP LAP VERTICAL SIDING WITH RECLAMED
FINISH ON R-5 ZIP PANEL ON 2X6 WOOD STUDS
WITH R-23 BIBS INSUALTION IN CAVITY 3:123:123 :1 2
3 :1 2
A2.0 MAIN LEVEL
8192' -7 3/4"
A3.0 UPPER LEVEL
8202' -11"
Plate Height
8211' -6"
Plate Height
8211' -6"
A1.0 LOWER
LEVEL
8182' -6"10' - 1 3/4"8' - 7"10' - 3 1/4"LIVING ROOM
PLATE HEIGHT
8203' -9 3/4"3:123 :1 2
A2.0 MAIN LEVEL
8192' -7 3/4"
A3.0 UPPER LEVEL
8202' -11"
A1.0 LOWER
LEVEL
8182' -6"
MASTER BATH
PLATE HT
8200' -8 7/8"3:123:123:123:12 970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION2/11/2019 11:27:36 AMA3.1EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS18512177 Saddle Ridge LoopPLANNING AND ZONING SET UPDATE SET2-4-19Single Family Residences atWildridge SubdivisionLot 22A, Avon CO 81620No.DescriptionDate1/4" = 1'-0"1 WEST ELEVATION
1/4" = 1'-0"3 NORTH ELEVATION
Attachment A
(3) RECESSED CAN
LIGHT AT ENTRY
(2) RECESSED CAN
LIGHT AT GARAGE
(2) RECESSED CAN
LIGHT AT ENTRY
970.328.5151 LIGHTS2177 Saddle Ridge Loop 2-4-19
Wildridge Subdivision
Lot 22A, Avon CO 81620
NORTH HOUSE
3/32" = 1'-0"1 A1.0 LOWER LEVEL RCP
3/32" = 1'-0"2 A2.0 MAIN LEVEL RCP
UP
WD DW
B U ILDIN GSETB A C KUTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT(RECEPTION No. 226437)N49°37'22"E - 114.02'L O T 2 1 B
8 1 8 0
8 1 9 084
928%3%8181'-6"929088868492proposed
drainage
easement82'
84'81'-6"7'-6"
10'-0"
22'-5 1_
2 "
2 3 '-6 3_
4 "
5'-0"5'-0"
4"
4"(SEE DETA IL)VIEW POINT13' - 6"9' - 6"25' - 0"13' - 4"10' - 3"12' - 9"26' - 8 1/2"cubbies under stair
open railing
STAIR AND LIGHT WELL
4' - 0"7' - 9 1/2"9' - 7 1/2"26' - 8 1/2"11' - 11"
8182' - 6"
6' - 4 1/2"
3' - 0 1/2"18' - 0"3' - 0 1/2"3' - 4"2' - 10"3' - 6"10' - 4 1/2"5' - 10"8182' - 0"
KIDS
BEDROOM 3
BATH
MUDROOM
MECHANICAL
2 CAR
GARAGE
8182' - 6"
8182' - 3 1/4"
LOW UNDER
STAIR STORAGE
METER CLOSET
4' - 9"45' - 5 1/2"
3' - 2"13' - 2 1/2"10' - 3 1/2"18' - 9 1/2"36' - 4"8' - 8 1/2"14' - 9"24' - 6"13' - 2 1/2"16' - 0"4' - 4"4' - 6"4' - 4"2' - 0 1/2"
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BATH
MASTER
CLOSET
LIVING ROOM
STAIR AND LIGHT WELL
UP
DN
DEN/OFFICE
DINING
AT GRADE
TERRACE8' - 1 1/2"12' - 3 1/2"12' - 9"4' - 6"5' - 4"3' - 1 1/2"15' - 2 1/2"6' - 3"6' - 0 1/2"14' - 6 1/2"10' - 9"11' - 8 1/2"7' - 8"4' - 8"MICROKITCHEN 7' - 3"5' - 6"2' - 3"3' - 0"2' - 3"2' - 3"3' - 0"coffe bar4' - 0 1/2"3' - 7"13' - 6"PANTRY6' - 6"5' - 7 1/2"3' - 6"3' - 2"42" REF36" RANGE7' - 9 1/2"2' - 1"3' - 0"3' - 0"
3' - 0"
LAUNDRY
PWDR
23' - 5 1/2"
15' - 2 1/2"
8192' - 7 3/4"
3' - 7"14' - 6 3/4"1' - 3"
7' - 6"
24' - 1 11/16"17' - 2 3/16"14' - 4"2' - 10 1/2"11' - 0 1/2"2' - 10 1/2"14' - 4"
STAIR AND LIGHT WELL
DN STUDY LOFT
KIDS
BEDROOM 1
KIDS
BEDROOM 2
8' - 11"8' - 1 1/2"13' - 2 1/2"14' - 3 1/2"12' - 3 1/2"7' - 8"A3.1
A3.0
A3.12
A3.1
1
1
3
8218' - 1 5/16"
EXISTING GRADE:8186'-9"
RIDGE ELEVATION:
RIDGE HT: 31'-4 5/16"
4:12
4:12
4:12 4:124:12
4:12EXISTING GRADE:8188'-0"
RIDGE ELEVATION:
RIDGE HT: 32'-5 13/16"
8220' - 5 13/16"
EXISTING GRADE:8188'-0"
RIDGE ELEVATION:
RIDGE HT: 30'-0 3/4"
8218' - 0 3/4"
EXISTING GRADE:8184'-6"
NEW GRADE: 8182'-5"
RIDGE ELEVATION:
RIDGE HT: 31'-2"
8211' - 8 1/2"
EXISTING GRADE:8183'-6"
NEW GRADE: 8182'-1"
RIDGE ELEVATION:
RIDGE HT: 29'-7 1/2"
EXISTING GRADE:8186'-2"
NEW GRADE: 8181'-10"
EAVE ELEVATION:
EAVE HT: 22'-7 1/2"
8203' - 6"
EXISTING GRADE:8190'-6"
NEW GRADE: 8191'-0"
EAVE ELEVATION:
EAVE HT: 21'-10"
8212' - 4"
EXISTING GRADE:8193'-0"
NEW GRADE: 8192'-6 1/2"
EAVE ELEVATION:
EAVE HT: 19'-11 7/16"
8212' - 5 15/16"
8213' - 7"970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION2/3/2019 3:07:47 PMA2.0FLOOR PLANS18512177 Saddle Ridge LoopPLANNING AND ZONING SET2-4-19Single Family Residences atWildridge SubdivisionLot 22, Avon CO 81620True
North
Project
North No.DescriptionDate1/4" = 1'-0"1 A1.0 LOWER LEVEL
1/4" = 1'-0"2 A2.0 MAIN LEVEL
True
North
Project
North
1/4" = 1'-0"3 A3.0 UPPER LEVEL
True
North
Project
North
Area Schedule (Gross Building)
Name Area
Lower Level Area 549.3 SF
Main Level Area 1504 SF
Upper Level Area 708.1 SF
Grand total: 3 2761.5 SF
1/8" = 1'-0"4 ROOF PLAN
A2.0 MAIN LEVEL
8192' -7 3/4"
A3.0 UPPER LEVEL
8202' -11"
Plate Height
8211' -6"
A1.0 LOWER
LEVEL
8182' -6"10' - 1 3/4"10' - 3 1/4"8' - 7"MASTER BATH
PLATE HT
8200' -8 7/8"
LIVING ROOM
PLATE HEIGHT
8203' -9 3/4"8' - 1 1/8"11' - 2"3' - 6"3' - 6"970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION2/3/2019 3:07:51 PMA3.0EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS18512177 Saddle Ridge LoopPLANNING AND ZONING SET2-4-19Single Family Residences atWildridge SubdivisionLot 22, Avon CO 81620No.DescriptionDate1/4" = 1'-0"1 EAST ELEVATION
2 3D View 1 3 3D View 2
A2.0 MAIN LEVEL
8192' -7 3/4"
A3.0 UPPER LEVEL
8202' -11"
Plate Height
8211' -6"
A1.0 LOWER
LEVEL
8182' -6"
MASTER BATH
PLATE HT
8200' -8 7/8"
LIVING ROOM
PLATE HEIGHT
8203' -9 3/4"
1x8 SHIP LAP SIDING WITH DARK FINISH
ON R-5 ZIP PANEL ON 2X6 WOOD STUDS WITH
R-23 BIBS INSUALTION IN CAVITY
1x8 SHIP LAP VERTICAL SIDING WITH RECLAMED
FINISH ON R-5 ZIP PANEL ON 2X6 WOOD STUDS
WITH R-23 BIBS INSUALTION IN CAVITY 4:124:124 :1 2
4 :1 2
A2.0 MAIN LEVEL
8192' -7 3/4"
A3.0 UPPER LEVEL
8202' -11"
Plate Height
8211' -6"
Plate Height
8211' -6"
A1.0 LOWER
LEVEL
8182' -6"10' - 1 3/4"8' - 7"10' - 3 1/4"LIVING ROOM
PLATE HEIGHT
8203' -9 3/4"4:124 :1 2
A2.0 MAIN LEVEL
8192' -7 3/4"
A3.0 UPPER LEVEL
8202' -11"
A1.0 LOWER
LEVEL
8182' -6"
MASTER BATH
PLATE HT
8200' -8 7/8"4:124:124:124:12 970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION2/3/2019 3:07:53 PMA3.1EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS18512177 Saddle Ridge LoopPLANNING AND ZONING SET2-4-19Single Family Residences atWildridge SubdivisionLot 22, Avon CO 81620No.DescriptionDate1/4" = 1'-0"1 WEST ELEVATION
1/4" = 1'-0"3 NORTH ELEVATION
February 19, 2019 PZC Meeting – 2177 Saddle Ridge B 1
Staff Report – Major Development Plan & Alternative Equivalent Compliance
February 19, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission
Meeting Case #MJR19003 and AEC19002
Project type
Major Development Plan and Alternative Equivalent Compliance
Public Hearing Required
Legal Description Lot 22B Block 1Wildridge Subdivision
Zoning Planned Unit Development (PUD)
Address 2177 Saddle Ridge
Prepared By David McWilliams, Town Planner
Staff Report Overview
This staff report contains two applications for consideration by the PZC: Major Development Plan
with Design Review for a new proposed single-family house; and an Alternative Equivalent
Compliance (AEC) for the roof pitch under the required 4:12 pitch.
Summary of Request
Jeff Manley (the Applicant) with Martin Manley Architects proposes a new house for Lot 22B (the
south unit). The building is 3 stories, 2,799 s.f. of livable space and includes a 1,007 s.f. garage. The
lowest level is ground level at the garage side and located below grade on the uphill side of the house.
It has a mix of shed roofs, mainly at 3:12, and a ridged roof at 7:12. The proposal is best described as
mountain modern style.
Public Notice
Notice of the public hearing was published in the February 8 edition of the Vail Daily in accordance
with Sec. 7.16.020(d) of the Avon
Development Code. Mailed notice is not
required for this application type.
Property Description
Lot 22B is .276 acres located near the
intersection of Saddle Ridge Loop and
Beaver Creek Point. It is zoned PUD and
accommodates a single family per the PUD
standards, updated in early 2019. It borders
duplex and single-family houses.
Planning Analysis
Lot Coverage, Setback and Easements: Lot
22A has a building envelope, easements, and a
limit of disturbance line that were modified
during the PUD amendment process, shown on
Attachment B, sheet A1.1.
February 19, 2019 PZC Meeting – 2177 Saddle Ridge B 2
Building Height: The maximum building height permitted for this property 35 feet. The applicant
is proposing a maximum building height of 30’-7” if the AEC is approved, and discussed in the AEC
section, below.
Parking: The project is required three (3) parking spaces, which are provided between the garage
and the spaces in front of the garage.
Design Standards Analysis
Landscaping & Irrigation: The building is proposed to be landscaped primarily with aspen, a
spruce tree, three deciduous shrub species, native grasses, ground cover, and mulch areas (sheet A1.3,
attachment B). The Landscape Unit count provided is 153.5 with 152 required. The application takes
advantage of the bonus for retained vegetation and for temporary irrigation. Permanent irrigation is
proposed as drip irrigation. Staff is concerned that the spruce tree is planned too close to the house and
may be deemed a fire hazard by the fire code. A condition of to place the tree further away from the
house is included in the recommended motion, below.
Building Design, Building Materials and Colors: The primary exterior building materials are wood
siding (stained brown and dark brown) and stone veneer (Attachment B, sheet A0.0). Colors were
reviewed for conformance with Sec. 7.28.090(j)(4)(viii), Building Materials, and determined to
comply with the design standards. All materials are of high quality and compliment Avon’s built
landscape.
Retaining Walls: There are two retaining walls on the south radiating from the garage to build into
the hill and create positive drainage. There is also a wall proposed to retain the driveway. All
retaining walls are proposed as river rock materials and rock excavated during construction. They are
between four (4’) and two (2’) feet tall.
Roof Material and Pitch: The roof material and pitch were reviewed for compliance with Sec.
7.28.090(d)(3) Roofs. The applicant is proposing many 3:12 roof pitches. Pitches are required to be
4:12 or above, therefore an Alternative Equivalent Compliance review is necessary, found below.
Roofline Modulation: AMC requires roofline modulation for buildings. Staff worked with the
applicant to improve the long roofline that extends nearly end to end of the second floor, thereby
creating more appearance of a broken-up form. Staff encourages PZC to assess the design for
conformance of this piece.
Exterior Lighting: The proposed lighting (Attachment C), is all recessed can lights below roofs or
overhangs, is Dark Sky Compliant, and the locations and quantity are found to be compliant with
lighting code.
Site Design: Code requires that, “Buildings shall be oriented to optimize solar access,” and staff is
concerned that this structure may not achieve this.
Major Development Plan & Design Review - Review Criteria
§ 7.16.080(f), Development Plan
1. Evidence of substantial compliance with the purpose of the Development Code as
February 19, 2019 PZC Meeting – 2177 Saddle Ridge B 3
specified in §7.04.030, Purposes;
Staff Response: The Application complies with the applicable purposes outlined in the Development
Code. Purpose (a) states, “Divide the Town into zones, restricting and requiring therein the location,
erection, construction, reconstruction, alteration and use of buildings, structures and land for trade,
industry, residence and other specified uses; regulate the intensity of the use of lot areas; regulate
and determine the area of open spaces surrounding such buildings; establish building lines and
locations of buildings designed for specified industrial, commercial, residential and other uses within
such areas; establish standards to which buildings or structures shall conform; establish standards
for use of areas adjoining such buildings or structures.”
2. Evidence of substantial compliance with §7.16.090, Design Review;
Staff Response: This Major Design and Development Plan Application should be assessed for
compliance with the Design Review criteria of the Development Code. The Design Review section
seeks quality development and structures that are visually harmonious with the site and the
surrounding vicinity. Conformance with this code section is discussed below and in Staff Analysis.
The roof pitch deviation from the Development Code is included for Alternative Equivalence
Compliance review, below.
3. Consistency with the Avon Comprehensive Plan;
Staff Response: The site is located in the Northern Residential District (District 11 of the
Comprehensive Plan), which states, “Due to the limited number of existing trees and shrubs and
the open character of the property, special care should be taken to ensure that all structures are
compatible with one another and in harmony with the natural surroundings.” During the PUD
process, the applicant noted that a potential duplex design would involve a roof ridge line parallel to
the street, thereby causing more visual disharmony than the split lots. A perpendicular line would
create more permeability from the neighboring lots. Now, the tallest ridge is proposed to be parallel
with the street.
The District includes principles that encourage minimal alteration to the natural environment and
steep slope development. This Application generally proposes a design that is consistent with the
Goals and Policies contained in the Comprehensive Plan, however, Policy C.2.4 states, “Encourage
landscaping and building locations that enhance neighborhood views and view corridors.”
4. Consistency with any previously approved and not revoked subdivision plat,
planned development, or any other precedent plan or land use approval for the property
as applicable;
Staff Response: The application is in conformance with the accompanying requirements of the
PUD zoning and the Development Code.
5. Compliance with all applicable development and design standards set forth in this
Code, including but not limited to the provisions in Chapter 7.20, Zone Districts and
Official Zoning Map, Chapter 7.24, Use Regulations, and Chapter 7.28, Development
Standards; and
Staff Response: The analysis contained in this staff report addresses all applicable Development
Code standards.
6. That the development can be adequately served by city services including but
February 19, 2019 PZC Meeting – 2177 Saddle Ridge B 4
not limited to roads, water, wastewater, fire protection, and emergency medical services.
Staff Response: The proposal was referred to the Eagle River Water and Sanitation District for
compliance with the property’s’ water allocation and received comments that are included in the
development application. All special services are well established in the subdivision.
§7.16.090(f), Design Review
1. The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community;
or, where redevelopment is anticipated, relates the development to the character of Avon
as a whole;
Staff Response: The Application proposes a design that may not relate to the character of the
surrounding community, due to a long roof ridge.
2. The design meets the development and design standards established in this
Development Code; and
Staff Response: Besides the roof design, the design is either compliant with the development
and design standards contained in the Development Code or seeks an Alternative Equivalent
Compliance.
3. The design reflects the long- range goals and design criteria from the Avon
Comprehensive Plan and other applicable, adopted plan documents.
Staff Response: Applicable adopted plans include the Avon Comprehensive Plan and provisions of
the Development Code. The design has been evaluated for conformance with these plans and
besides the concerns mentioned, staff has determined the proposed design meets the requirements as
proposed.
7.16.120 - Alternative Equivalent Compliance
Alternative equivalent compliance is a procedure that allows development to meet the intent of
the design-related provisions through an alternative design. It is not a general waiver or
weakening of regulations; rather, this application procedure permits a site-specific plan that is
equal to or better than the strict application of a design standard specified in the Development
Code. This procedure is not intended as a substitute for a variance or administrative modification
or a vehicle for relief from standards in this Chapter. Alternative compliance shall apply only to
the specific site for which it is requested and does not establish a precedent for assured approval of
other requests.
Review Criteria.
The PZC shall use the following review criteria as the basis for a decision on an application
for alternative equivalent compliance:
1. The proposed alternative achieves the intent of the subject design or development standard to
the same or better degree than the subject standard;
2. The proposed alternative achieves the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan to
the same or better degree than the subject standard;
3. The proposed alternative results in benefits to the community that are equivalent to or better
than compliance with the subject standard; and
4. The proposed alternative imposes no greater impacts on adjacent properties than would occur
through compliance with the specific requirements of this Title.
AEC Request
February 19, 2019 PZC Meeting – 2177 Saddle Ridge B 5
The roof design component requires an AEC for PZC consideration. The Application proposes a
minimum roof pitch of 3:12, instead of the required 4:12 on the roof sections, in deviation of AMC sec.
7.28.090(d)(3)(i):
All residential buildings shall have pitched roofs with a rise of not less than four (4) inches in twelve
(12) inches of distance. Primary roofs shall have a four-to-twelve (4:12) minimum and a twelve-to-
twelve (12:12) maximum. Secondary roofs shall have a four-to-twelve (4:12) minimum and metal roofs
shall have a three-to-twelve (3:12) minimum. Flat roofs may be permitted as secondary roofs or if the
flat roof is consistent with the architectural style of the building.
The summary of the request can be found in Attachment D.
Applicant Response
The mountain modern design uses low snug roofs. This aids in neighboring houses being able to look
over this home. The scale of the building is lower. The comparison house shown with 4:12 forms has
a higher overall height (30’ –7” vs 33’-3 1/8’) and empty interior space. The “pivot point” of the roof
is at the wall and therefore following code would result in an unnecessarily taller structure.
Staff Analysis
PZC is instructed to review the alternative for achieving the intent of the subject design standard,
which is in part informed by the Purposes section of Avon Municipal Code. Section 7.04.030(l)
states, “Promote architectural design which is compatible, functional, practical and complimentary
checking to Avon's sub-alpine environment.” The design as presented appears to meet all of the
guidelines. The intent of mandating a 4:12 pitch is to create an attractive angled shape of the roof, and
a unified aesthetic throughout town. Snow loading is another concern that the Municipal Code seeks
to avoid by prohibiting low-pitched roofs.
The type of home proposed is best described as “mountain modern,” which generally favors a lower
pitched roof, unique structure shape, and large windows and doors. The height reduction and layout
seem to adhere to the Avon Comprehensive Plan, “Policy A.1.5: Promote development that maximizes
sun exposure and protects views.” The south elevation of the house does not appear to maximize sun
exposure, which seems in contrast to the mountain modern aesthetic and the Comp Plan.
Overall, staff is satisfied that the roof design achieves the intent of the Municipal Code. Staff feels
that while it has some design concerns for the house as noted in the above sections, the 3:12 pitches
do not hurt the overall aesthetic and the design favorably compliments the adjacent properties and
surrounding community. The PZC should carefully assess the application for compliance with the
review criteria, listed above. Staff has outlined a recommended motion for approval of the AEC
request.
Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of the Alternative Equivalent Compliance application for Lot 22B Block 1
Wildridge Subdivision with the following findings:
Findings:
1. The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.080(f), Development Plan,
§7.16.090(f), Design Review, and §7.16.120 Alternative Equivalent Compliance;
2. The AEC achieves the intent of the roof design standard to the same or better degree than the
subject standard;
February 19, 2019 PZC Meeting – 2177 Saddle Ridge B 6
3. The AEC achieves the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan to the same or better
degree than the roof design standards, including Policy A.1.5;
4. The AEC results in benefits to the community that are equivalent to compliance with the roof
design standards; and
5. By limiting the height of the building, the AEC imposes no greater impacts on adjacent
properties than would occur through compliance with the specific requirements of the Avon
Development Code.
Recommended Motion:
“I move to approve Case #AEC19002, an application for Alternative Equivalent Compliance for Lot
22B Block 1 Wildridge Subdivision together with the findings of fact and conditions as recommended
by Staff.”
Staff Recommendation for MJR19003 Major Design & Development Plan:
Staff recommends approving the Major Development Plan application for Lot 22B Block 1 Wildridge
Subdivision to a later date, with the following findings of fact and conditions:
Findings:
1. The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.080(f), Development Plan,
§7.16.090(f), Design Review. The design meets the development and design standards
established in the Avon Development Code;
2. The application is complete;
3. The application provides sufficient information to allow the PZC to determine that the
application complies with the relevant review criteria;
4. The application complies with the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan;
5. The demand for public services or infrastructure exceeding current capacity is mitigated by the
application; and
6. The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community.
Conditions:
1. The spruce tree shall be installed so the crown does not come within ten (10) feet of the house.
Motion to Approve the Application:
“I move to approve Case #MJR19003, an application for Major Design and Development Plan for
Lot 22B Block 1 Wildridge Subdivision together with the findings of fact as recommended by Staff.”
Exhibits
A. Design & Development Plans
B. Lighting Plan
C. AEC Alternative Design
Date: 2-4-19
Meeting at TOA RE: Design review 2177 Saddle Ridge Loop, Lot 22B South house
The lot 22 at 2177 Saddle Ridge Loop is being split into 2 single family lots that will result in the lot 22B,
southern most lot, at a size of 12,038.5 s.f. or .276 acres.
During the approved split of the lot the following restrictions were placed on the property.
1 The building footprint will be limited to 2000 s.f.
2 The total livable area of the home shall be limited to 2800 s.f.
3 A building envelope was established at 3300 s.f. in which the building, overhangs, roofs, and
decks are to be kept within. On grade terraces, drives, and walks would be able to extend
beyond the envelope, but not into any non-development area.
4 Non development area was designated to maintain a natural landscape and buffer to the
neighbors.
The home is proposed as a mountain modern design. The home is a 5 bedroom, 4 bath residence with
a 3 car garage and a large waterproof deck on the south end. The design has the roof planes set to
create interesting interior volumes and capture the commanding views. The deck is set up to capture
views to Game Creek Bowl. During the lot split meetings there was concern of the neighbors of
diminishing their easterly views. While protecting their view is not a design restriction, we feel that it is
a concern to address. The presented design addresses their concerns by working to limit the overall
height of the building by roof form and reducing the roof pitch. The primary roof is at 7:12 pitch, which
meets code. We will be applying and seeking approval for an AEC for the ability to provide the home
with secondary roof forms at a 3:12 roof pitch (with asphalt shingles) in lieu of the min secondary roof
slope of 4:12 called out in the development code. We feel that this lowered roof pitch enhances the
design, reduces wasted interior volume, lowers the height of the building at the street façade, and
reduces the overall building height. The presented design, with the 3:12 pitched roofs, creates a
maximum building height of 30’-4 1/2”, or 4’-7 1/2” below the developable right of 35’-0” maximum
building height. ( For reference: The 4:12 pitch creates a ridge at 33’-3” roof height; still below max, but
unnecessarily taller)
We believe that we have created a handsome home that fits well within the language of the Wildridge
neighborhood and fits the design goals of the owners. We are seeking approval at the next P and Z
meeting on Feb. 19th, 2019 for the building design and the AEC.
The exterior lighting for the home will be accomplished using recessed can lighting within the soffits or
roofs, or cantilevered structures. This shall conform to the Town’s darksky restrictions. Lighting is to
be located in the following location: (3) at the entry terrace, (2) at the cantilever over the garage doors,
and (4) at the side covered waterproof deck.
Thank you,
Jeffrey P Manley AIA
Martin Manley Architects
970-328-1299 (direct)
970-688-0326 (cell)
www.martinmanleyarchitects.com
Attachment A
ZONING INFORMATION-Lot 22B
Lot 22B, Wildridge Subdivision
2177 Saddle Ridge Loop, Avon Colorado
Zoning: Single Family Lot,
Lot 22B Area = .276 acres = 12,038.5 s.f.
Maximum Lot Coverage Allowed = 50% of Lot Area 12,038.5= 6,019.25 s.f.
Minimum Landscape Area Allowed = 25% of Lot Area 12,038.5= 3,009.625 s.f.
Platted Building Envelope = 3300 s.f. (allowed by plat)
Proposed Building Height= 30'-7 1/8" (<35'-0" allowed by right)
Proposed Livable Area = 2798.8 s.f. (<2,800 s.f. allowed by plat)
Proposed Garage Area =1,006.9 s.f.
total =3,805.7 s.f.
Proposed Lot coverage by building/footprint =1,645.4 s.f. (allowed footprint of <2,000 s.f. by plat)
Proposed Impervious area
(Building ) 1,645.4 s.f. + 1,933 s.f. (drive + terraces) = 3,578.4 s.f.
Proposed Landscape area
(Lot area= 12,038.5 s.f.)-(imperv. by footprint 1,645.4 s.f.) = 10,393.1 s.f. Landscape area ( 86.3%)
(Lot area= 12,038.5 s.f.)-(imperv. total 3,578.4 s.f.) = 8,460.1s.f. Landscape area ( 70.3%)
Platted no disturb area = 850 s.f.
Parking Requirements: 3 spaces required
Snow Storage: 20 % of 1,593 s.f. Drive = 318.6 s.f. of snow storage (330 s.f. provided)
Exterior Lighting: Dark sky compliant, RECESSED CAN LIGHTING
Roofing:
50-Year (TL) Asphalt shingle
Elk-GAF , Prestique High Def, Charcoal
Flashing, and Gutters:
Paint lock aluminum
Color: to match black
Waterproof garage roof terrace and Entry patio
saw cut concrete slab
Drive:Asphalt drive
Windows:
Aluminum Clad windows and doors
Color: iron ore
Timbers, and fascia
1x6 and 2x8, Wood Fascia Trim
Color: FLOOD 913 Ebony (200%) semi-transparent
Typical Horizontal wide Siding: 1X8 ship lapped or T&G
Wood Siding Rough sawn texture
Color: FLOOD 910 Mushroom semi-transparent
Typical Horizontal thin Siding: 1X6 ship lapped
Wood Siding Rough sawn texture
Color: FLOOD 707 Tobacco (darken) semi-transparent
Stone Veneer: greystone-Telluride stone co.
drystack, Rectilinear stones,
Horizontal/linear stack
Same stone for wall caps 970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject No.:DateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION2/10/2019 7:12:54 PMA0.0COVER18512177 Saddle Ridge LoopPLANNING AND ZONING SET update 2-11-192-04-19Single Family Residences atWildridge SubdivisionLot 22B, Avon CO 816202177 Saddle Ridge Loop
PLANNING AND ZONING
SET update 2-11-19
Single Family Residences at
Wildridge Subdivision
Lot 22B, Avon CO 81620
2-04-19
No.DescriptionDateProject Team Information
Owner: 2177 SADDLE RIDGE LOOP LLC
PO BOX 741
AVON, CO 81620-0741
Location: 2177 Saddle Ridge Loop
Lot 22, Block 1,
Wildridge Subdivision
Parcel Number 1943-354-03-011
Architect:Martin Manley Architect
Jeffrey P Manley AIA
PO Box 1587
Eagle, CO 81631
970.328.5151
jeff@martinmanleyarchitects.com
General Contractor:
DW Dantas Construction LLC
Dave Dantas
PO Box 2322
Avon, CO 81620
970.376.6111
dave@dwdantas.com
Parcel Number:1943-354-03-011
Location: 2177 Saddle Ridge Loop,Lot 22, Block 1,
Wildridge Subdivision
Class of Work: New Construction
Type of Construction: Type V-B
Type of Occupancy: R3
Levels: 2-story + basement
Fire Sprinklers: No
Monitored alarm system: Yes
Heating: Forced air
Furnace:Min. 92% efficiency, GAS
2015 International Residential Code (IRC) including Appendix F & G
12" = 1'-0"
ZONING SUMMARY
12" = 1'-0"
COLOR BOARD
Attachment A
UP
DN
DWWD638.5 SF
Lower Level Area
1006.9
SF
Garage
1504 SF
Main Level Area
656.2 SF
Upper Level Area 970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION2/10/2019 7:36:56 PMA0.1AREA CALCULATIONS18512177 Saddle Ridge LoopPLANNING AND ZONING SET update 2-11-192-04-19Single Family Residences atWildridge SubdivisionLot 22B, Avon CO 81620No.DescriptionDate1/8" = 1'-0"1 A1.0 LOWER LEVEL
1/8" = 1'-0"2 A2.0 MAIN LEVEL
1/8" = 1'-0"3 A3.0 UPPER LEVEL
Area Schedule (Gross Building)
Name Area
Lower Level Area 638.5 SF
Main Level Area 1504 SF
Upper Level Area 656.2 SF
Grand total: 3 2798.8 SF
Area Schedule (Gross garage)
Name Area
Garage 1006.9 SF
Grand total: 1 1006.9 SF
Attachment A
6.8°
WOOD FENCE
CTV PEDESTAL
TELEPHONE
PEDESTAL
ELECTRIC
TRANSFORMER
SATTELITE
DISH
FLOWLINE OF
18" C.M.P. 8173.9
8187.6
8188.1
8185.2
8182.4
8183.0
8181.0
8180.8
8179.1
8178.9
8177.1
8177.3
8176.1
8175.7
8175.2
8175.9
8176.3
EDGE OF ASPHALT
FLOWLINE OF
DITCH
EDGE OF
ASPHALT
EDGE OF GRAVEL
FOUND No. 5 REBAR
WITH RED PLASTIC CAP
L.S. No. 5447
FOUND No. 5 REBAR
WITH RED PLASTIC CAP
L.S. No. 5447
BUILDING
SETBACK
BUILDING
SETBACK
BUILDING
SETBACK
UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT
(RECEPTION No. 226437)UTI
L
I
TY AND DRAI
NAGE EASEMENT(RECEPTI
ON No. 226437)
U TILITY A N D DR A IN A G E EA SEM EN T(REC EPTIO N N o. 226437)SLOPE MAINTENANCE, DRAINAGE AND
SNO
W STORAGE EASEMENT
(RECEPTION No. 226437)
N 49°37'22"E - 114.02'S89°54'56"E - 210.69'S30°46'55"E - 100.81'
LOT 22
0.57 ACRES
ADDRESS: 2177 SADDLE RIDGE LOOP
LOT 21B
LOT 23
LOT 25B
LOT 25A
S
A
D
D
L
E
R
I
D
GE
L
O
O
P
(
5
0
'
R
I
G
H
T
-O
F
-W
A
Y
)
LOT 24B
LOT 22B
12039.0 S.F.
LOT 22A
12877.7 S.F.
8180
819
0
8200
8
2
0
0
8190
8180
77'-9"
78
79
5%
first20'at
4%
80
84
96
92
96
92
8%
8%
84'-6
3%
3%
90
82'-0
81
81'-6"
94
92
90
88
86
84
84'84'
8%first20'at4%88
86
82'
94
95 81'6'82'390
92
9 0
88
94
94
92
8 6
8 4'
90
86
84
82
78
78
78
92
proposed
drainage
easement
82'84'
81'-6"7'-6"10'-0"
2 5 '-0 "10'-0"10'-0"7'-6"10'-0"22'-73_
8"
22'-51_2"
30'-33_4"
23'-63_
4"
5'-0"5'-0"
VIEWS
BEAVER CREEKMOUNTAINGAME CREEK BOWLRED AND WHITEMOUNTAIN10
1 inch = 10 ft.
( IN FEET )
5
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 10 20
4"
4"
4"
10"
4"
4"
S
C TV
P
(SEE DETAIL)
VIEWPOINT
T.O. WALL
B.O. WALL
2'-0"8182'
8180'
G
U
E
S
T
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
95' 9 BET
W
EEN D
RIVE W
AY C
U
RB C
UTS
SURFACE DRAINAGE TO DITCH28' - 1"27'
-
0"
ROUGHLT 55 FEET BETWEEN BUILDINGS
T.O. WALLB.O. WALL
4'-0"
8194' 8190'
T.O. WALL
B.O. WALL
2'-0"8184'
8182'VI
EW LI
NE DI
STANCE
AROUND CORNER
I
S 165 FEET
(TO SOUTH
)
GRADE IN
THIS AREA
IS LOWERED
TO IMPROVE
SIGHT LINE
TO DRIVE
PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE
ADJACENT HOME CORNER
(20' FROM THIS PROPERTY LINE
view path to Game Creek Bowl
3200 S.F. OF PROPOSED NON DEVELOPEMENT AREA
(MAY HAVE LIMITED DISTURBING TO CONNECT TO UTILIES)
67' - 8"50' - 5"65' - 5 1/2"
65' - 5 1/2"
5 0 ' - 5 "2' - 9"
Total Lot 22
Area: 24916.63 s.f.
Area of no disturbance/natural: 3200 s.f. (undisturbed at back of lot and under south neighbor’s trees)
Lot 22A Lot 22B
Area:12877.7 s.f.Area:12038.5 s.f.
Area of no disturb: 2350 s.f.Area of no disturb: 850 s.f.
Area of no disturbance on lot= 10527.7 s.f.Area of no disturbance on lot= 11188.5 s.f.
Area within envelope: 3300 s.f.Area within envelope: 3300 s.f.
T.O. WALL
B.O. WALL
4'-0"8190'
8186'
T.O. WALLB.O. WALL
2'-6"
8188' 8185' 6 14' - 0"14' - 0 13/16"
SNOW
STORAGE AREA
330 S.F.
SNOW
STORAGE AREA
330 S.F.
SILT FENCIN
G ALO
N
G THE D
O
W
NHILL SIDE
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
FENCING
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
FENCING. SOME
REMOVAL OF SHRUBS
WILL OCCUR OUTSIDE
OF THE FENCE
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
FENCING.
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
FENCING.
SILT FENCING ALONG THE DOWNHILL SIDE 5' - 4 3/16"18" DIA x30'
LONG CULVERT
18" DIA x30' LONG
CULVERT
ZONING INFORMATION-Lot 22A
Lot 22A, Wildridge Subdivision
2177 Saddle Ridge Loop, Avon Colorado
Zoning: Single Family Lot,
Lot 22A Area = .286 acres = 12877.7 s.f.
Maximum Lot Coverage Allowed = 50% of Lot Area 12877.7= 6,438.85 s.f.
Minimum Landscape Area Allowed = 25% of Lot Area 12877.7= 3,219.425 s.f.
Platted Building Envelope = 3300 s.f. (allowed by plat)
Proposed Building Height= 30'-5" (<35'-0" allowed by right)
Proposed Livable Area = 2761.5 s.f. (<2,800 s.f. allowed by plat)
Proposed Garage Area =831.2 s.f.
total =3,592.7 s.f.
Proposed Lot coverage by building/footprint =1,381.4 s.f. (allowed footprint of <2,000 s.f. by plat)
Proposed Impervious area
(Building ) 1,381.4 s.f. + 1,915 s.f. (drive + terraces) =3,296.4s.f.
Proposed Landscape area
(Lot area= 12877.7 s.f.)-(imperv. by footprint 1,381.4 s.f.) = 11,496.3 s.f. Landscape area ( 89.3%)
(Lot area= 12877.7 s.f.)-(imperv. total 3,296.4 s.f.) = 9,581.3 s.f. Landscape area ( 74.4%)
Platted no disturb area = 2,350 s.f.
Parking Requirements: 3 spaces required
Snow Storage: 20 % of 1,464 s.f. Drive = 292.8 s.f. of snow storage (330 s.f. provided)
Exterior Lighting: Dark sky compliant, RECESSED CAN LIGHTING
ZONING INFORMATION-Lot 22B
Lot 22B, Wildridge Subdivision
2177 Saddle Ridge Loop, Avon Colorado
Zoning: Single Family Lot,
Lot 22B Area = .276 acres = 12,038.5 s.f.
Maximum Lot Coverage Allowed = 50% of Lot Area 12,038.5= 6,019.25 s.f.
Minimum Landscape Area Allowed = 25% of Lot Area 12,038.5= 3,009.625 s.f.
Platted Building Envelope = 3300 s.f. (allowed by plat)
Proposed Building Height= 30'-3" (<35'-0" allowed by right)
Proposed Livable Area = 2798.8 s.f. (<2,800 s.f. allowed by plat)
Proposed Garage Area =1,006.9 s.f.
total =3,805.7 s.f.
Proposed Lot coverage by building/footprint =1,645.4 s.f. (allowed footprint of <2,000 s.f. by plat)
Proposed Impervious area
(Building ) 1,645.4 s.f. + 1,933 s.f. (drive + terraces) = 3,578.4 s.f.
Proposed Landscape area
(Lot area= 12,038.5 s.f.)-(imperv. by footprint 1,645.4 s.f.) = 10,393.1 s.f. Landscape area ( 86.3%)
(Lot area= 12,038.5 s.f.)-(imperv. total 3,578.4 s.f.) = 8,460.1s.f. Landscape area ( 70.3%)
Platted no disturb area = 850 s.f.
Parking Requirements: 3 spaces required
Snow Storage: 20 % of 1,593 s.f. Drive = 318.6 s.f. of snow storage (330 s.f. provided)
Exterior Lighting: Dark sky compliant, RECESSED CAN LIGHTING
970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION2/10/2019 7:35:20 PMA1.1SITE PLAN18512177 Saddle Ridge LoopPLANNING AND ZONING SET UPDATE SET2-4-19Single Family Residences atWildridge SubdivisionLot 22, Avon CO 81620No.DescriptionDate1" = 10'-0"1 A0.0 SITE PLAN
12" = 1'-0"
ZONING SUMMARY- LOT 22A
12" = 1'-0"
ZONING SUMMARY- LOT 22B
Attachment A
2 5 ' - 0 ".34' - 6 3/16"VIEW TO RED AND WHITEVIEW TO
GAME CREEK
8196'
elev at cornerLetter of supportL e tte r o f s u p p o rtMAIN LEVEL
8207' elev
EYE LEVEL
8212' elev
MAIN LEVEL
8209' elev
EYE LEVEL
8214' elev
LARGE
EVERGREEN
TREES 25' TALL
V I E W C O R R I D O R (S K Y T O V A L L E Y F L O O R )
P R O V I D E D W I T H L O T S P L I T T H A T W O U L D
N O T E X I S T W I T H D U P L E X
S U P P O R T A T 1 S T M T G
970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION2/10/2019 7:35:22 PMA1.1.6Unnamed18512177 Saddle Ridge LoopPLANNING AND ZONING SET UPDATE SET2-4-19Single Family Residences atWildridge SubdivisionLot 22, Avon CO 81620No.DescriptionDate1" = 20'-0"1
A0.0 SITE PLAN GOOGLE EARTH view
from neighbor study
VIEWS BETWEEN OR
AROUND THE HOMES
ARE IMPROVED WITH
THE 2 SINGLE FAMILY
HOMES OVER THE
DUPLEX
THE MAIN RIDGES IN
THE CURRENT DESIGN
ARE PARALLEL TO THE
VIEW. DUPLEX MASS
CREATES A LONG
RIDGE
PERPENDICULAR
THE HOMES ARE
BROKEN UP AND ARE
ABLE TO HAVE MORE
BACK YARD. THIS
INCREASES THE
DISTANCE TO THE
NEIGHBORS TO THE
WEST
Attachment A
6.8°
WOOD FENCE
CTV PEDESTAL
TELEPHONE
PEDESTAL
ELECTRIC
TRANSFORMER
SATTELITE
DISH
FLOWLINE OF
18" C.M.P. 8173.9
SEWER MANHOLE MH 520
RIM ELEVATION = 8184.8
INVERT (N) ELEVATION = 8179.0
INVERT (S) ELEVATION = 8178.8EDGE OF
ASPHALT
EDGE OF GRAVEL
FOUND No. 5 REBAR
WITH RED PLASTIC CAP
L.S. No. 5447
FOUND No. 5 REBAR
WITH RED PLASTIC CAP
L.S. No. 5447
BUILDING
SETBACK
BUILDING
SETBACK
BUILDING
SETBACK
UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT
(RECEPTION No. 226437)UTI
L
I
TY AND DRAI
NAGE EASEMENT(RECEPTI
ON No. 226437)
U TILITY A N D D RA IN A GE EA SEM EN T(REC EPTIO N N o. 226437)SLOPE MAINTENANCE, DRAINAGE AND
SNOW STORAGE EASEMENT
(RECEPTION No. 226437)
N 49°37'22"E - 114.02'S89°54'56"E - 210.69'S30°46'55"E - 100.81'
LOT 22
0.57 ACRES
ADDRESS: 2177 SADDLE RIDGE LOOP
LOT 21B
LOT 23
OT 25B
LOT 25A
LOT 24B
LOT 22B
12039.0 S.F.
LOT 22A
12877.7 S.F.
8180
819
0
8200
8
2
0
0
8190
8180
77'-9"
78
79
5%
first20'at
4%
80
84
96
92
96
92
8%
8%
84'-6
3%
3%
90
82'-0
81
81'-6"
94
92
90
88
86
84
84'84'
8%first20'at4%88
86
82'
94
95 81'6'82'390
92
9 0
88
94
94
92
8 6
8 4'
90
86
84
82
78
78
78
92
proposed
drainage
easement
82'84'
81'-6"
10
1 inch = 10 ft.
( IN FEET )
5
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 10 20
4"
4"
4"
10"
4"
4"
S
C TV
P
(SEE DETAIL)
VIEWPOINT
G
U
E
S
T
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
S U R F A C E D R A IN A G E T O D IT C H
PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE
ADJACENT HOME CORNER
(20' FROM THIS PROPERTY LINE
view path to Game Creek Bowl
3200 S.F. OF PROPOSED
NON DEVELOPEMENT AREA
(MAY HAVE LIMITED
DISTURBING TO CONNECT
TO UTILIES)
GROUND
COVER.
CS
QA 2
QA 2
QA 2
QA 2
QA 2
QA
QA
QA
QA
QA
QA QASP
SP
SP
SP SPLL
LL
LL LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
C E
C ECE
C ECE
MULCH
MULCH
SILT FENCIN
G ALO
N
G THE D
O
W
NHILL SIDE
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
FENCING
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
FENCING. SOME
REMOVAL OF SHRUBS
WILL OCCUR OUTSIDE
OF THE FENCE
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
FENCING.
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
FENCING.
SILT FENCING ALONG THE DOWNHILL SIDE 5' - 4 3/16"NOTE:
LARGE EVERGREE TREES EXI
ST ON NEI
GHBORS PROPERTY
I
N THI
S AREA,THE GOAL OF THE LARGE ASPEN AND 2 SMALLER ASPEN TREES
I
S TO BE TUCKED OUT OF NEI
GHBOR VI
EW PATHS.
CONTRACTOR SHALL REVI
EW HE PLACEMENT OF THESE 3 TREES.
LINE OF ROOF OVERHANG LINE OF ROOF OVERHANGCS
Q A 2
Q A
Q A
Q A
QA
SP
SP
SP
SP SPL L
L L
L L
L L
C E
C E
C E
C E
C E
L L
L L
L L
L L
L L L L
C E
C E
Q A 2
Q A 2
Q A 2
Q A 2
QA
QA
QA
GROUND
COVER.
AC C
O
NTR
OLLER
back flow valve
manual shut-off
valve
VALVE ASSE
M
BLY
Sensor stake in ground
to read soil moisture
contentAC CONTROLLERback flow valvemanual shut-off valveVALVE ASSEMBLYSensor stake in ground to read soil moisture contentTHE IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE DESIGNED BY THE
LANDSCAPE SUBCONTRACTOR.
The design shall:
(A) Prevent runoff, low head drainage, overspray, or other
similar conditions where irrigation water flows onto non-
targeted areas, such as adjacent property, non-irrigated areas,
hardscapes, roadways, or structures. Restrictions regarding
overspray and runoff may be modified if the landscape area is
adjacent to permeable surfacing and no runoff occurs or if the
adjacent non-permeable surfaces are designed and
constructed to drain entirely to landscaping.
(B) Conform to the hydrozones of the landscape design plan.
(C) Have matched precipitation rates within a hydrozone,
unless otherwise directed by the manufacturer's
recommendations.
(D) Meet the required operating pressure of the emission
devices using valve pressure regulators, sprinkler head
pressure regulators, inline pressure regulators, booster
pumps, or other devices. The pressure and flow
measurements identified at the design stage will be verified
prior to the installation of the system.
(E) Meet the requirements set in the American National
Standards Institute (ANSI) standard, ASABE/ICC 802-2014
"Landscape Irrigation Sprinkler and Emitter Standard authored
by the American Society of Agricultural and Biological
Engineers and the International Code Council and verified by
an independent third-party.
(F) Achieve the highest possible sprinkler spacing distribution
uniformity using the manufacturer's recommendations. All
sprinkler head installed in the turfgrass areas shall have a
distribution uniformity of 0.65 or higher using the protocol
defined in ASABE/ICC 802-2014 standard.
22A IRRIGATION NOTE:
1 ALL RESEEDED AREAS ARE TO TEMPORARY DRIP IRRIGATION
2 THE GROUND COVER AND PLANTING BEDS ARE TO RECIEVE PERMANENT
MICRO SPRAY AND DRIP IRRIGATION
3 ALL TEMPORARY IRRIGATION SHALL BE INSTALLED ABOVE GROUND AND PHYSICALLY REMOVED
AFTER 2 GROWING SEASONS OR AFTER PLANT ESTABLISHMENT, WHICHEVER COMES FIRST.
TOTAL OF PERMANENT DRIP AND MICRO SPRAY IRRIGATION AREA OF 1,700 S.F.
22A, NORTH HOUSE
Minimum Landscape Area Allowed = 25% of Lot Area 12877.7= 3,219.425 s.f.
Proposed Landscape area
(Lot area= 12877.7 s.f.)-(imperv. total 3,296.4 s.f.) = 9,581.3 s.f. Landscape area ( 74.4%)
Landscapre area 9,581.3 s.f. -2,350 s.f. of undisturbed area=7,231.3 s.f. of disturbed
Total irrigated area
1,700 s.f. (17.7% of the total landscape area)
Total Permanent Drip irrigation =500 s.f. (29% of irrigation total)
*at trees provide 1 gallon per hour, 3 times a week
* shrubs provide 1 gallon per hour, 3 times a week
Total Permanent micro spray irrigation =400 s.f. (23.5% of irrigation total)
*at planting beds and ground covers place mirco spray at
8'-0" spacing. 1/2 gallon per minute, 3 times a week
Total Permanent pop-up spray irrigation =800 s.f. (47% of irrigation total)
* at sodded mountain mix, water at volumes as recommented by the
'Water Wise residential guide for Western Colorado' 3 times a week
Total irrigated landscape area = 7,231.3 s.f.
Total permanent irrigation =1,700.0 s.f.
Total Temporary irrigation =5,531.3 s.f.+non irrigated 2,350 s.f.=(82.4 % of total landscape area)
Permanent drip irrigation at aspen trees and planting beds 500 s.f.
Permanent micro spray irrigation ground cover planting beds 400 s.f.
Use the following table as a guideline for how long to run your drip system (Note: watering
times are based on using 1.0 GPH Emitters):
Permanent pop up rain bird spray irrigation sodded turf 800 s.f.
22B IRRIGATION NOTE:
1 ALL RESEEDED AREAS ARE TO TEMPORARY DRIP IRRIGATION
2 THE GROUND COVER AND PLANTING BEDS ARE TO RECIEVE PERMANENT
MICRO SPRAY AND DRIP IRRIGATION
3 ALL TEMPORARY IRRIGATION SHALL BE INSTALLED ABOVE GROUND AND PHYSICALLY REMOVED
AFTER 2 GROWING SEASONS OR AFTER PLANT ESTABLISHMENT, WHICHEVER COMES FIRST.
TOTAL OF PERMANENT DRIP AND MICRO SPRAY IRRIGATION AREA OF 900 S.F.
22B, SOUTH HOUSE
Minimum Landscape Area Allowed = 25% of Lot Area 12038.5= 3,009.625 s.f.
Proposed Landscape area
(Lot area= 12038.5s.f.)-(imperv. total 3,578.4 s.f.) = 8460.1s.f. Landscape area ( 74.4%)
Landscapre area 8460.1s.f. -850 s.f. of undisturbed area=7,610.9 s.f. of disturbed
Total irrigated area
900 s.f. (11.8% of the total landscape area)
Total Permanent Drip irrigation =500 s.f. (29% of irrigation total)
*at trees provide 1 gallon per hour, 3 times a week
* shrubs provide 1 gallon per hour, 3 times a week
Total Permanent micro spray irrigation =400 s.f. (23.5% of irrigation total)
*at planting beds and ground covers place mirco spray at
8'-0" spacing. 1/2 gallon per minute, 3 times a week
Water at volumes as recommented by the
'Water Wise residential guide for Western Colorado' 3 times a week
Total irrigated landscape area = 7,610.9 s.f.
Total permanent irrigation =900 s.f.
Total Temporary irrigation =6,710.9 s.f.+non irrigated 850 s.f.=(89.4 % of total landscape area)
Permanent drip irrigation at aspen trees and planting beds 500 s.f.
Permanent micro spray irrigation ground cover planting beds 400 s.f.970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION2/10/2019 7:35:23 PMA1.2.1IRRIGATION PLAN18512177 Saddle Ridge LoopPLANNING AND ZONING SET UPDATE SET2-4-19Single Family Residences atWildridge SubdivisionLot 22, Avon CO 81620No.DescriptionDate1" = 10'-0"1 A0.0 IRRIGATION PLAN- LOT 22A
12" = 1'-0"
IRRIGATION NOTES Attachment A
6.8°
WOOD FENCE
CTV PEDESTAL
TELEPHONE
PEDESTAL
ELECTRIC
TRANSFORMER
SATTELITE
DISH
FLOWLINE OF
18" C.M.P. 8173.9
SEWER MANHOLE MH 520
RIM ELEVATION = 8184.8
INVERT (N) ELEVATION = 8179.0
INVERT (S) ELEVATION = 8178.8
FLOWLINE OF
DITCH
EDGE OF
ASPHALT
EDGE OF GRAVEL
FOUND No. 5 REBAR
WITH RED PLASTIC CAP
L.S. No. 5447
FOUND No. 5 REBAR
WITH RED PLASTIC CAP
L.S. No. 5447
BUILDING
SETBACK
BUILDING
SETBACK
BUILDING
SETBACK
UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT
(RECEPTION No. 226437)UTI
LI
TY AND DRAI
NAGE EASEMENT(RECEPTI
ON No. 226437)
U TILITY A N D DR A IN A G E EA SEM EN T(REC EPTIO N N o. 226437)SLOPE MAINTENAN
CE, DRAINAGE AND
SNO
W STORAGE EASEMENT
(RECEPTION No. 226437)
N 49°37'22"E - 114.02'S89°54'56"E - 210.69'S30°46'55"E - 100.81'
LOT 22
0.57 ACRES
ADDRESS: 2177 SADDLE RIDGE LOOP
LOT 21B
LOT 23
LOT 25B
LOT 25A
LOT 24B
LOT 22B
12039.0 S.F.
LOT 22A
12877.7 S.F.
8180
819
0
8200
8
2
0
0
8190
8180
77'-9"
78
79
5%
first20'at
4%
80
84
96
92
96
92
8%
8%
84'-6
3%
3%
90
82'-0
81
81'-6"
94
92
90
88
86
84
84'84'
8%first20'at4%88
86
82'
94
95 81'6'82'390
92
9 0
88
94
94
92
8 6
8 4'
90
86
84
82
78
78
78
92
proposed
drainage
easement
82'84'
81'-6"
10
1 inch = 10 ft.
( IN FEET )
5
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 10 20
4"
4"
4"
10"
4"
4"
S
C TV
P
(SEE DETAIL)
VIEWPOINT
G
U
E
S
T
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
S U R F A C E D R A IN A G E T O D IT C H
PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE
ADJACENT HOME CORNER
(20' FROM THIS PROPERTY LINE
view path to Game Creek Bowl
3200 S.F. OF PROPOSED
NON DEVELOPEMENT AREA
(MAY HAVE LIMITED
DISTURBING TO CONNECT
TO UTILIES)14' - 0"14' - 0 13/16"
GROUND
COVER.
CS
QA 2
QA 2
QA 2
QA 2
QA 2
QA
QA
QA
QA
QA
QA QASP
SP
SP
SP SPLL
LL
LL LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
C E
C ECE
C ECE
MULCH
MULCH
SILT FENCIN
G ALO
N
G THE D
O
W
NHILL SIDE
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
FENCING
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
FENCING. SOME
REMOVAL OF SHRUBS
WILL OCCUR OUTSIDE
OF THE FENCE
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
FENCING.
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
FENCING.
SILT FENCING ALONG THE DOWNHILL SIDE 5' - 4 3/16"NOTE:
LARGE EVERGREE TREES EXI
ST ON NEI
GHBORS PROPERTY
I
N THI
S AREA,THE GOAL OF THE LARGE ASPEN AND 2 SMALLER ASPEN TREES
I
S TO BE TUCKED OUT OF NEI
GHBOR VI
EW PATHS.
CONTRACTOR SHALL REVI
EW HE PLACEMENT OF THESE 3 TREES.
LINE OF ROOF OVERHANG LINE OF ROOF OVERHANGCS
Q A 2
Q A
Q A
Q A
QA
SP
SP
SP
SP SPL L
L L
L L
L L
C E
C E
C E
C E
C E
L L
L L
L L
L L
L L L L
C E
C E
Q A 2
Q A 2
Q A 2
Q A 2
QA
QA
QA
GROUND
COVER.
18" DIA x30'
LONG CULVERT
18" DIA x30' LONG
CULVERT
QA
Deciduous Trees
Count
QUAKING ASPEN
(POPULUS TREMULOIDES)
1.5" to 2.5" CAL.
Size
7
12
Symbol Name
Deciduous Shrubs
LL DWARF KOREAN LILAC
(SYRINGA MEYERI 'PALABIN')
OR Fendler ceanothus, mountain-lilac
#5 10
22
CE #5 7COTONEASTER DAMMERI CORAL BEAUTY
(COTONEASTER DAMMERI)
GC
Perennial Ground covers
400 square feet of cover.
CS
Conifer Trees
6'-8' tall 1
1
Colorado Spruce
(Picea pungens)
Mulched Areas
SHREDDED BARK MULCHED AREA -AROUND
TREES AND SHRUBS NOT COVERED BY GROUND
COVER
Natural Grass Areas (reveg)
SEED MIX OF GRASSES AND FESCUE SEED.
ARKANSAS VALLEY SEED COMPANY, NATIVE LOW
GROW MOUNTAIN MIX.AREAS ARE TO SPRAYED
WITH A FERTILIZER AND SEED MIX.
MULCH
NG Temp drip irrigation in areas to
become more natural
MULCH
IRRIGATION NOTE:
1 ALL RESEEDED AREAS ARE TO TEMPORARY DRIP IRRIGATION, REMOVE IRRIGATION AT ESTABLISHMENT
2 THE GROUND COVER AND PLANTING BEDS ARE TO RECIEVE PERMANENT
MICRO SPRAY AND DRIP IRRIGATION
TOTAL OF PERMANENT DRIP AND SPRAY IRRIGATION AREA OF 1,500 S.F.
SNOW IN SUMMER, STONECROP, CREEPING
PHLOX, NATIVE LOW -GROW GRASSES, ROCKY
MTN. FESCUE
500 square feet of cover.
Q A
CS
LLS P
C E
#5SP 5SPIREA, ANTHONY WATERER
(Spiraea japonica ‘Anthony Waterer’)
5000 square feet of SPRAY SEED cover.
2.5" to 4" CAL.5
Q A 2QA2 QUAKING ASPEN
(POPULUS TREMULOIDES)
GROUND COVER
Landscape and Irrigation table
AREA MATRIX:
ZONING INFORMATION-Lot 22B
Lot 22B Area = .276 acres = 12,038.5 s.f.
Maximum Lot Coverage Allowed = 50% of Lot Area 12,038.5= 6,019.25 s.f.
Minimum Landscape Area Allowed = 25% of Lot Area 12,038.5= 3,009.625 s.f.
Platted Building Envelope = 3300 s.f. (allowed by plat)
Proposed Livable Area = 2798.8 s.f. (<2,800 s.f. allowed by plat)
Proposed Garage Area =1,006.9 s.f.
total =3,805.7 s.f.
Proposed Lot coverage by building/footprint =1,645.4 s.f. (allowed footprint of <2,000 s.f. by plat)
Proposed Impervious area
(Building ) 1,645.4 s.f. + 1,933 s.f. (drive + terraces) = 3,578.4 s.f.
Proposed Landscape area
(Lot area= 12,038.5 s.f.)-(imperv. by footprint 1,645.4 s.f.) = 10,393.1 s.f. Landscape area ( 86.3%)
(Lot area= 12,038.5 s.f.)-(imperv. total 3,578.4 s.f.) = 8,460.1 s.f. Landscape area ( 70.3%)
Platted no disturb area = 850 s.f.
Proposed Temp Irrigation only in reveg. seeded areas.
Temp irrigation to be removed after establiment of seeded areas.
Landscape Units = 8,460.1 s.f. -850 s.f. of undisturbed area=7,610.1 / 50 s.f. per unit =152.2 units
25% Landscape Units to be provided be trees = 25% of 152.2 units =38.05 units by trees
Landscape Material (trees)New Existing retained Units
Deciduous 1.5" -2.5" caliper/clump = 4 units per tree X 7=28 4 units per tree X 0 =0 28 units
Deciduous 2.5" -4" caliper/clump = 7 units per tree X 5=35 9 units per tree X 0 =0 35 units
Evergreen 6'-8' high =6 units per tree X 1 =6 11 units per tree X 0=11 6 units
Landscape Material (shrubs)New Existing retained Units
Shrubs, 5 gallon = 1 unit per shrub X 20 =22 1.2 units per shrub X 0 =0 22 units
Perennial Ground covers Units
1 unit per 400 s.f. 400 s.f. proposed / 400 s.f.=1 units 1 units
Hardscape Material Units Awarded calculation Units
Shredded Bark (mulch at planting beds around trees)1/500 s.f. 500 s.f. planting bed area/500 =1 1 Units
subtotal 93 units
Retained Existing Vegetation Mass Bonus Landscape Units Awarded
300+ square feet of native Vegetation 10%
Proposed Undisturbed Native vegetation Area = 900 s.f.< 300 s.f. Bonus to be applied
10 % of 93 units = 9.3 9.3 units
subtotal 102.3units
Drip Irrigation Bonus Landscape Units Awarded
80% or more of total landscaped area on temporary irrigation 50%
50 % of 102.3 units = 51.15 Bonus to be applied 51.15units
Total Landscape Units Proposed (152.2 required)153.45 units
NOTE: TREES WITHIN UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE NOT COUNTED IN UNIT TOTAL 970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION2/10/2019 7:35:25 PMA1.3LANDSCAPE PLAN 22B18512177 Saddle Ridge LoopPLANNING AND ZONING SET UPDATE SET2-4-19Single Family Residences atWildridge SubdivisionLot 22, Avon CO 81620No.DescriptionDate1" = 10'-0"1 A0.0 LANDSCAPE PLAN- LOT 22B
1/8" = 1'-0"
LANDSCAPE LEGEND - LOT 22B
12" = 1'-0"
LANDSCAPE UNITS - LOT 22B
Attachment A
6.8°
WOOD FENCE
CTV PEDESTAL
TELEPHONE
PEDESTAL
ELECTRIC
TRANSFORMER
SATTELITE
DISH
FLOWLINE OF
18" C.M.P. 8173.9
8187.6
8188.1
8185.2
8182.4
8183.0
8181.0
8180.8
8179.1
8178.9
8177.1
8177.3
8176.1
8175.7
8175.2
8175.9
8176.3
EDGE OF ASPHALT
FLOWLINE OF
DITCH
EDGE OF
ASPHALT
EDGE OF GRAVEL
FOUND No. 5 REBAR
WITH RED PLASTIC CAP
L.S. No. 5447
FOUND No. 5 REBAR
WITH RED PLASTIC CAP
L.S. No. 5447
BUILDING
SETBACK
BUILDING
SETBACK
BUILDING
SETBACK
UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT
(RECEPTION No. 226437)UTI
L
I
TY AND DRAI
NAGE EASEMENT(RECEPTI
ON No. 226437)
U TILITY A N D D RA IN A GE EA SEM EN T(R EC EPTIO N N o. 226437)SLOPE MAINTENANCE, DRAINAGE AND
SNO
W STORAGE EASEMENT
(RECEPTION No. 226437)
N 49°37'22"E - 114.02'S89°54'56"E - 210.69'S30°46'55"E - 100.81'
LOT 22
0.57 ACRES
ADDRESS: 2177 SADDLE RIDGE LOOP
LOT 21B
LOT 23
LOT 25B
LOT 25A
S
A
D
D
L
E
R
I
D
GE
L
O
O
P
(
5
0
'
R
I
G
H
T
-O
F
-W
A
Y
)
LOT 24B
LOT 22B
12039.0 S.F.
LOT 22A
12877.7 S.F.
8180
819
0
8200
8
2
0
0
8190
8180
77'-9"
VIEWS
BEAVER CREEKMOUNTAINGAME CREEK BOWLRED AND WHITEMOUNTAIN10
1 inch = 10 ft.
( IN FEET )
5
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 10 20
4"
4"
4"
10"
4"
4"
S
C TV
P
GAS METER
GAS METERELEC/METER CLOSET
ELEC/METER CLOSET
E L E C
E L E C ELEC ELECE L E C
E L E C
ELECSEWERGASSEWERGASSEWERGASSE
W
ER
GAS
SEWERGASSEWERGASSEWER
GAS
SEWER
GAS
C A B L E A N D T E L E
C A B L E A N D T E L E
C A B L E A N D T E L E
C A B L E A N D T E L E CABLE AND TELECABLE AND TELE
SOIL STOCKPILE
SOIL STOCKPILE
DUMPSTER
DU
M
P
STER
MATERIAL STORAGE IN
GARAGE AND IN
DRIVEWAY
MATERIAL STORAGE IN
GARAGE AND IN
DRIVEWAY
C
O
NSTR
U
CTIO
N PARKIN
G O
N R
O
AD
C
O
NSTR
U
CTIO
N PARKIN
G O
N R
O
AD
JOB SIGN
C
O
NSTR
U
CTIO
N
TOIL
E
T
SILT FENCIN
G ALO
N
G THE D
O
W
NHILL SIDE
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
FENCING
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
FENCING. SOME
REMOVAL OF SHRUBS
WILL OCCUR OUTSIDE
OF THE FENCE
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
FENCING.
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
FENCING.
SILT FENCING ALONG THE DOWNHILL SIDE 5' - 4 3/16"3200 S.F. OF PROPOSED NON DEVELOPMENT AREA
(MAY HAVE LIMITED DISTURBING TO CONNECT TO UTILITIES)
G
RADIN
G AN
D D
RIVE AC
CESS IM
PR
O
VE
M
ENTS
O
UTSIDE PR
O
PERTY LINE ARE SUBJECT TO A
RIG
HT-OF-W
AY PER
MIT
D
U
RIN
G C
O
NSTR
U
CTIO
N PR
O
VIDE A 6" DEEP x 12'
WIDE x A LEN
GTH OF 20' G
RAVEL TRACKIN
G PA
D
AT THE AC
CESS P
OINT TO THE SITE
18" DIA x30'
LONG CULVERT
18" DIA x30' LONG
CULVERT
W
ATER
W
ATER 970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION2/10/2019 7:35:25 PMA1.4CONSTRUCTION MGMT18512177 Saddle Ridge LoopPLANNING AND ZONING SET UPDATE SET2-4-19Single Family Residences atWildridge SubdivisionLot 22, Avon CO 81620No.DescriptionDate1" = 10'-0"1 CONSTRUCTION MGMT
NOTE:
1. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR WILL APPLY AND COMPLETE
THE CONNECTION APPLICATION ON THE ERW&SD WEBSITE
BEFORE CONSTRUCTION COMENCES
2. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE THE WATER
AND SEWER LINES WITH ERW&SD PRIOR TO EXCAVATION
Attachment A
UP DWWDD D R A IN A G E E A S E M E N T
7 9
5 %
9 6
3 %
9 0
84'
84'8 %
8 8
8 6
9 4
9 5
9 0
8 8
9 4
9 4
9 2
8 4 '9 0
22'-73_
8"
30'-33_
4"
10"
4"
13' - 6"9' - 6"25' - 0"36' - 4"26' - 8 1/2"cubbies under stair
open railing
STAIR AND LIGHT WELL
4' - 0"7' - 9 1/2"9' - 7 1/2"1' - 6"11' - 11"
8185' - 0"
6' - 4 1/2"
3' - 0 1/2"18' - 0"3' - 0 1/2"
1' - 1 1/2"11' - 2 1/2"5' - 6"2' - 8"24' - 0 1/2"11 1/2"12' - 0"
6' - 4 1/2"6' - 5"5' - 4 1/2"8' - 9"21' - 1"6' - 6"4' - 10"4' - 9 1/2"5' - 10 1/2"12' - 9"8184' - 6"
METER CLOSET
22' - 0"2' - 8 1/2"4' - 4"17' - 8"4' - 9"45' - 5 1/2"
2' - 10 1/2"13' - 0"8' - 7 1/2"6' - 0"14' - 11 1/2"36' - 4"10' - 5"13' - 0 1/2"24' - 6"13' - 2 1/2"16' - 0"MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BATH
MASTER
CLOSET
LIVING ROOM
STAIR AND LIGHT WELL
UP
DN
GUEST
BEDROOM
DINING
8' - 1 1/2"12' - 3 1/2"7' - 1"5' - 8"14' - 6 1/2"10' - 9"11' - 8 1/2"7' - 8"4' - 9 1/2"1' - 11"MICROKITCHEN4 1/2"3' - 6"8' - 10 1/2"2' - 9"2' - 0"3' - 0"coffe bar4' - 0 1/2"3' - 7"13' - 0"5' - 5 1/2"6' - 10"
PANTRY6' - 8 1/2"6' - 6"36" REF 48" RANGE
3' - 2"2' - 0"1' - 0"4' - 0 1/2"1' - 0"3' - 0"
LAUNDRY
23' - 5 1/2"
24' - 0 1/2"
4' - 10"4' - 10"
GUEST
BATH
3' - 6"4' - 1"2' - 9"2' - 7 1/2"3' - 11"10' - 3 1/2"
WATERPROOF
DECK TERRACE
OVER GARAGE
DUCT
CHASE
3' - 7"3' - 1 1/2"
2' - 6"5' - 0"4' - 0"10' - 0"3' - 0"
1' - 8 1/2"10' - 0"1' - 0 1/2"
8195' - 1 3/4"
12' - 5 1/2"2' - 5"10' - 0"5' - 3 1/2"2' - 7"12' - 8 1/2"
STAIR AND LIGHT WELL
DN
LOFT
KIDS
BEDROOM 1
KIDS
BEDROOM 28' - 1 1/2"13' - 2 1/2"7' - 8"45' - 6"
o p e n to b e lo w
36" tall wall or open railing14' - 8 1/2"10' - 7 1/2"
3:12
EXISTING GRADE:8185'-3"
NEW GRADE: 8184'-4"
RIDGE ELEVATION:
RIDGE HT: 27'-0"
8211' - 4"
EXISTING GRADE:8187'-0"
NEW GRADE: 8185'-0"
RIDGE ELEVATION:
RIDGE HT: 30'-4 1/2"
8215' - 4 1/2"
EXISTING GRADE:8188'-9"
RIDGE ELEVATION:
RIDGE HT: 30'-7 1/8"
8219' - 0"
EXISTING GRADE:8191'-11"
RIDGE ELEV.:
RIDGE HT: 27'-1
EXISTING GRADE:8192'-3"
RIDGE ELEVATION:
RIDGE HT: 27'-9
8220' - 5 1/4"
EXISTING GRADE:8194'-1"
NEW GRADE: 8194'-8"
RIDGE ELEVATION:
RIDGE HT: 26'-4 1/4"
NEW GRADE:8194'-1"
EAVE ELEVATION:
EAVE HT: 20'-10 3/8"
8205' - 2 1/16"
NEW GRADE:8194'-5"
EAVE ELEVATION:
EAVE HT: 10'-9 1/16
EXISTING
CONTOUR 8186
EXISTING
CONTOUR 8188
EXISTING
CONTOUR 8184
E X I S T I N G
C O N T O U R 8 1 8 6
BUILDING ENVELOPE
3:12
6:123:12
3:12
E X I S T I N G
C O N T O U R 8 1 9 2
8220' - 5 1/4"8220' - 0"6:126:123:12
EXISTING GRADE:8191'-0"
RIDGE ELEVATION:
RIDGE HT: 29'-5 1/4"
8219' - 4 1/8"
8214' - 11 3/8"970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION2/10/2019 7:12:55 PMA2.0FLOOR PLANS18512177 Saddle Ridge LoopPLANNING AND ZONING SET update 2-11-192-04-19Single Family Residences atWildridge SubdivisionLot 22B, Avon CO 81620True
North
Project
North No.DescriptionDate1/4" = 1'-0"1 A1.0 LOWER LEVEL
1/4" = 1'-0"2 A2.0 MAIN LEVEL
True
North
Project
North1/4" = 1'-0"3 A3.0 UPPER LEVEL
True
North
Project
North
Area Schedule (Gross Building)
Name Area
Lower Level Area 638.5 SF
Main Level Area 1504 SF
Upper Level Area 656.2 SF
Grand total: 3 2798.8 SF
1/8" = 1'-0"4 ROOF PLAN
Attachment A
A2.0 MAIN LEVEL
8195' -1 3/4"
A3.0 UPPER LEVEL
8205' -5"
Plate Height
8214' -6 1/8"
A1.0 LOWER
LEVEL
8185' -0"9' - 1 1/8"MASTER BATH
PLATE HT
8203' -2 7/8"
LIVING ROOM
PLATE HEIGHT
8207' -5 3/4"12' - 4"8' - 5"8188' - 0"
8185' - 6"
EXISTING GRADE
8184' - 0"
8184' - 6"
8185' - 0"6:123:12
3 :1 2
2X12 BELLY BAND WITH FLASHING AT TOP
1x6 SHIP LAP SIDING WITH LIGHTER FINISH
ON R-5 ZIP PANEL ON 2X6 WOOD STUDS WITH R-23 BIBS
INSUALTION IN CAVITY
1x8 SHIP LAP SIDING WITH DARK FINISH
ON R-5 ZIP PANEL ON 2X6 WOOD STUDS WITH
R-23 BIBS INSUALTION IN CAVITY
WIDE FLANGE STEEL COLUMN
WITH ADDRESS
WIDE FLANGE STEEL
COLUMN
AND TIMBER BEAM
STONE VENEER ON R-5
ZIP PANEL ON 2X6 WOOD
STUDS WITH R-23 BIBS
INSUALTION IN CAVITY
ASPHALT SHINGLES ON FULL
COVERAGE WATERPROOF
MEMBRANE ON ROOF SHEATHING ON
PRE ENGINEERED TRUSSES
ASPHALT SHINGLES ON FULL
COVERAGE WATERPROOF
MEMBRANE ON ROOF SHEATHING ON
14" LVL RAFTERS WITH R-48 BIBS
INSULATION
(2) RECESSED LIGHT FIXTURE IN FLOOR
CANTILEVER OVER LARGE GARAGE DOOR
(3) RECESSED LIGHT FIXTURE IN
FLOOR STRUCTURE ABOVE ENTRY
(4) RECESSED
LIGHT FIXTURES IN
ROOF STRUCTURE 970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION2/11/2019 10:12:03 AMA3.0EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS18512177 Saddle Ridge LoopPLANNING AND ZONING SET update 2-11-192-04-19Single Family Residences atWildridge SubdivisionLot 22B, Avon CO 81620No.DescriptionDate1/4" = 1'-0"1 EAST ELEVATION
2 3D View 1 3 3D View 2
Attachment A
A2.0 MAIN LEVEL
8195' -1 3/4"
A3.0 UPPER LEVEL
8205' -5"
Plate Height
8214' -6 1/8"
A1.0 LOWER
LEVEL
8185' -0"
MASTER BATH
PLATE HT
8203' -2 7/8"
LIVING ROOM
PLATE HEIGHT
8207' -5 3/4"
8190' - 6"
8193' - 0"
EXISTING GRADE
8194' - 1"
2X12 BELLY BAND WITH FLASHING AT TOP
1x6 SHIP LAP SIDING WITH LIGHTER FINISH
1x8 SHIP LAP SIDING WITH DARK FINISH
ASPHALT SHINGLES ON FULL COVERAGE WATERPROOF
MEMBRANE ON ROOF SHEATHING ON PRE ENGINEERED TRUSSES.
R-48 INSULATION AT BTM CHORD
6:123 :1 2
3:12
(4) RECESSED LIGHT FIXTURES IN ROOF STRUCTURE
A2.0 MAIN LEVEL
8195' -1 3/4"
A3.0 UPPER LEVEL
8205' -5"
Plate Height
8214' -6 1/8"
A1.0 LOWER
LEVEL
8185' -0"10' - 1 3/4"9' - 1 1/8"10' - 3 1/4"LIVING ROOM
PLATE HEIGHT
8207' -5 3/4"3:128194' - 0"
8188' - 0"
EXISTING GRADE
8194' - 0"
8190' - 0"
8188' - 0"
8186' - 0"
(4) RECESSED LIGHT FIXTURES IN ROOF STRUCTURE
(2) RECESSED
LIGHT FIXTURE
IN FLOOR
CANTILEVER
OVER LARGE
GARAGE DOOR
(3) RECESSED
LIGHT FIXTURE
IN FLOOR
STRUCTURE
ABOVE ENTRY
A2.0 MAIN LEVEL
8195' -1 3/4"
A3.0 UPPER LEVEL
8205' -5"
Plate Height
8214' -6 1/8"
A1.0 LOWER
LEVEL
8185' -0"
MASTER BATH
PLATE HT
8203' -2 7/8"9' - 1 1/8"10' - 3 1/4"10' - 1 3/4"8' - 1 1/8"3:126 :1 2 6:12 3:12E X I S T I N G G R A D E 970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION2/10/2019 7:13:02 PMA3.1EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS18512177 Saddle Ridge LoopPLANNING AND ZONING SET update 2-11-192-04-19Single Family Residences atWildridge SubdivisionLot 22B, Avon CO 81620No.DescriptionDate1/4" = 1'-0"1 WEST ELEVATION
1/4" = 1'-0"2 SOUTH ELEVATION
1/4" = 1'-0"3 NORTH ELEVATION
Attachment A
(3) RECESSED CAN
LIGHT AT ENTRY
(2) RECESSED CAN
LIGHT AT GARAGE
(4) RECESSED
CAN LIGHT
AT
WATERPROOF
DECK
970.328.0592 LIGHTS2177 Saddle Ridge Loop 2-04-19
Wildridge Subdivision
Lot 22B, Avon CO 81620
3/32" = 1'-0"1 A1.0 LOWER LEVEL RCP
3/32" = 1'-0"2 A2.0 MAIN LEVEL RCP
SOUTH HOUSE
Attachment B
UP DWWDD D R A IN A G E E A S E M E N T
7 9
5 %
9 6
3 %
9 0
84'
84'8 %
8 8
8 6
9 4
9 5
9 0
8 8
9 4
9 4
9 2
8 4 '9 0
22'-73_
8"
30'-33_
4"
10"
4"
13' - 6"9' - 6"25' - 0"36' - 4"26' - 8 1/2"cubbies under stair
open railing
STAIR AND LIGHT WELL
4' - 0"7' - 9 1/2"9' - 7 1/2"1' - 6"11' - 11"
8185' - 0"
6' - 4 1/2"
3' - 0 1/2"18' - 0"3' - 0 1/2"
1' - 1 1/2"11' - 2 1/2"5' - 6"2' - 8"24' - 0 1/2"11 1/2"12' - 0"
6' - 4 1/2"6' - 5"5' - 4 1/2"8' - 9"21' - 1"6' - 6"4' - 10"4' - 9 1/2"5' - 10 1/2"12' - 9"8184' - 6"
METER CLOSET
22' - 0"2' - 8 1/2"4' - 4"17' - 8"4' - 9"45' - 5 1/2"
2' - 10 1/2"13' - 0"8' - 7 1/2"6' - 0"14' - 11 1/2"36' - 4"10' - 5"13' - 0 1/2"24' - 6"13' - 2 1/2"16' - 0"MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BATH
MASTER
CLOSET
LIVING ROOM
STAIR AND LIGHT WELL
UP
DN
GUEST
BEDROOM
DINING
8' - 1 1/2"12' - 3 1/2"7' - 1"5' - 8"14' - 6 1/2"10' - 9"11' - 8 1/2"7' - 8"4' - 9 1/2"1' - 11"MICROKITCHEN4 1/2"3' - 6"8' - 10 1/2"2' - 9"2' - 0"3' - 0"coffe bar4' - 0 1/2"3' - 7"13' - 0"5' - 5 1/2"6' - 10"
PANTRY6' - 8 1/2"6' - 6"36" REF 48" RANGE
3' - 2"2' - 0"1' - 0"4' - 0 1/2"1' - 0"3' - 0"
LAUNDRY
23' - 5 1/2"
24' - 0 1/2"
4' - 10"4' - 10"
GUEST
BATH
3' - 6"4' - 1"2' - 9"2' - 7 1/2"3' - 11"10' - 3 1/2"
WATERPROOF
DECK TERRACE
OVER GARAGE
DUCT
CHASE
3' - 7"3' - 1 1/2"
2' - 6"5' - 0"4' - 0"10' - 0"3' - 0"
1' - 8 1/2"10' - 0"1' - 0 1/2"
8195' - 1 3/4"
12' - 5 1/2"2' - 5"10' - 0"5' - 3 1/2"2' - 7"12' - 8 1/2"
STAIR AND LIGHT WELL
DN
LOFT
KIDS
BEDROOM 1
KIDS
BEDROOM 28' - 1 1/2"13' - 2 1/2"7' - 8"45' - 6"
o p e n to b e lo w
36" tall wall or open railing14' - 8 1/2"10' - 7 1/2"
4:12
EXISTING GRADE:8185'-3"
NEW GRADE: 8184'-4"
RIDGE ELEVATION:
RIDGE HT: 29'-1 5/16"
8213' - 5 5/16"
EXISTING GRADE:8187'-0"
NEW GRADE: 8185'-0"
RIDGE ELEVATION:
RIDGE HT: 33'-3 1/8"
8218' - 3 1/8"
EXISTING GRADE:8188'-9"
RIDGE ELEVATION:
RIDGE HT: 30'-6 3/8"
8219' - 11"
EXISTING GRADE:8191'-11"
RIDGE ELEVATION:
RIDGE HT: 28'-0"8219' - 11"
EXISTING GRADE:8192'-3"
RIDGE ELEVATION:
RIDGE HT: 27'-8
8219' - 8 5/16"
EXISTING GRADE:8194'-1"
NEW GRADE: 8194'-8"
RIDGE ELEVATION:
RIDGE HT: 25'-7 5/16"
NEW GRADE:8194'-1"
EAVE ELEVATION:
EAVE HT: 20'-9 1/4
8204' - 7 15/16"
NEW GRADE:8194'-5"
EAVE ELEVATION:
EAVE HT: 10'-2 15/16
EXISTING
CONTOUR 8186
EXISTING
CONTOUR 8188
EXISTING
CONTOUR 8184
E X I S T I N G
C O N T O U R 8 1 8 6
BUILDING ENVELOPE
4:127:127:127:124:12
4:12
E X I S T I N G
C O N T O U R 8 1 9 2
8219' - 3 3/8"970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION2/3/2019 3:14:33 PMA2.0FLOOR PLANS18512177 Saddle Ridge LoopPLANNING AND ZONING SET2-04-19Single Family Residences atWildridge SubdivisionLot 22B, Avon CO 81620True
North
Project
North No.DescriptionDate1/4" = 1'-0"1 A1.0 LOWER LEVEL
1/4" = 1'-0"2 A2.0 MAIN LEVEL
True
North
Project
North1/4" = 1'-0"3 A3.0 UPPER LEVEL
True
North
Project
North
Area Schedule (Gross Building)
Name Area
Lower Level Area 638.5 SF
Main Level Area 1504 SF
Upper Level Area 656.2 SF
Grand total: 3 2798.8 SF
1/8" = 1'-0"4 ROOF PLAN
Attachment C
A2.0 MAIN LEVEL
8195' -1 3/4"
A3.0 UPPER LEVEL
8205' -5"
Plate Height
8214' -6 1/8"
A1.0 LOWER
LEVEL
8185' -0"9' - 1 1/8"MASTER BATH
PLATE HT
8203' -2 7/8"
LIVING ROOM
PLATE HEIGHT
8207' -5 3/4"12' - 4"8' - 0 3/4"8188' - 0"
8185' - 6"
EXISTING GRADE
8184' - 0"
8184' - 6"
8185' - 0"7:127:124:12
4:12
4 :1 2
2X12 BELLY BAND WITH FLASHING AT TOP
1x6 SHIP LAP SIDING WITH LIGHTER FINISH
ON R-5 ZIP PANEL ON 2X6 WOOD STUDS WITH R-23 BIBS
INSUALTION IN CAVITY
1x8 SHIP LAP SIDING WITH DARK FINISH
ON R-5 ZIP PANEL ON 2X6 WOOD STUDS WITH
R-23 BIBS INSUALTION IN CAVITY
WIDE FLANGE STEEL COLUMN
WITH ADDRESS
WIDE FLANGE STEEL
COLUMN
AND TIMBER BEAM
STONE VENEER ON R-5
ZIP PANEL ON 2X6 WOOD
STUDS WITH R-23 BIBS
INSUALTION IN CAVITY
ASPHALT SHINGLES ON FULL
COVERAGE WATERPROOF
MEMBRANE ON ROOF SHEATHING ON
PRE ENGINEERED TRUSSES
ASPHALT SHINGLES ON FULL
COVERAGE WATERPROOF
MEMBRANE ON ROOF SHEATHING ON
14" LVL RAFTERS WITH R-48 BIBS
INSULATION
(2) RECESSED LIGHT FIXTURE IN FLOOR
CANTILEVER OVER LARGE GARAGE DOOR
(3) RECESSED LIGHT FIXTURE IN
FLOOR STRUCTURE ABOVE ENTRY
(4) RECESSED
LIGHT FIXTURES IN
ROOF STRUCTURE 970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION2/3/2019 3:14:37 PMA3.0EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS18512177 Saddle Ridge LoopPLANNING AND ZONING SET2-04-19Single Family Residences atWildridge SubdivisionLot 22B, Avon CO 81620No.DescriptionDate1/4" = 1'-0"1 EAST ELEVATION
2 3D View 1 3 3D View 2
Attachment C
A2.0 MAIN LEVEL
8195' -1 3/4"
A3.0 UPPER LEVEL
8205' -5"
Plate Height
8214' -6 1/8"
A1.0 LOWER
LEVEL
8185' -0"
MASTER BATH
PLATE HT
8203' -2 7/8"
LIVING ROOM
PLATE HEIGHT
8207' -5 3/4"
8190' - 6"
8193' - 0"
EXISTING GRADE
8194' - 1"
2X12 BELLY BAND WITH FLASHING AT TOP
1x6 SHIP LAP SIDING WITH LIGHTER FINISH
1x8 SHIP LAP SIDING WITH DARK FINISH
ASPHALT SHINGLES ON FULL COVERAGE WATERPROOF
MEMBRANE ON ROOF SHEATHING ON PRE ENGINEERED TRUSSES.
R-48 INSULATION AT BTM CHORD7:124 :1 2
4:12
(4) RECESSED LIGHT FIXTURES IN ROOF STRUCTURE
A2.0 MAIN LEVEL
8195' -1 3/4"
A3.0 UPPER LEVEL
8205' -5"
Plate Height
8214' -6 1/8"
A1.0 LOWER
LEVEL
8185' -0"10' - 1 3/4"9' - 1 1/8"10' - 3 1/4"LIVING ROOM
PLATE HEIGHT
8207' -5 3/4"4:127:127:1 2
8194' - 0"
8188' - 0"
EXISTING GRADE
8194' - 0"
8190' - 0"
8188' - 0"
8186' - 0"
(4) RECESSED LIGHT FIXTURES IN ROOF STRUCTURE
(2) RECESSED
LIGHT FIXTURE
IN FLOOR
CANTILEVER
OVER LARGE
GARAGE DOOR
(3) RECESSED
LIGHT FIXTURE
IN FLOOR
STRUCTURE
ABOVE ENTRY
A2.0 MAIN LEVEL
8195' -1 3/4"
A3.0 UPPER LEVEL
8205' -5"
Plate Height
8214' -6 1/8"
A1.0 LOWER
LEVEL
8185' -0"
MASTER BATH
PLATE HT
8203' -2 7/8"9' - 1 1/8"10' - 3 1/4"10' - 1 3/4"8' - 1 1/8"4:127 :1 2 7:12
4:12E X I S T I N G G R A D E 970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION2/3/2019 3:14:40 PMA3.1EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS18512177 Saddle Ridge LoopPLANNING AND ZONING SET2-04-19Single Family Residences atWildridge SubdivisionLot 22B, Avon CO 81620No.DescriptionDate1/4" = 1'-0"1 WEST ELEVATION
1/4" = 1'-0"2 SOUTH ELEVATION
1/4" = 1'-0"3 NORTH ELEVATION
Attachment C
February 19, 2019 Code Text Amendment Public Hearing
To: Planning and Zoning Commission
From: David McWilliams, Town Planner
Meeting Date: February 19, 2019
Topic: Code Text Amendment - Continued Public Hearing
INTRODUCTION
This memo serves as an update from the last public hearing of several Code Text Amendment
proposals. Staff encourages a review of the February 5, 2019 memo that covers the amendments
more in depth.
SUMMARY OF UPDATES
Alternative Design
Parking was removed from the eligible code sections and language about community public benefit
was removed, in favor of the already-proposed criteria (3) regarding no negative impact on health
and safety.
Employee Housing Mitigation
Staff deleted the “households generated” section from Table 7.20-14 because as noted during the
public hearing, it was double-counted as originally proposed. The arithmetic it now only included
in Table 7.20-15 and relates to unit size for different accommodation types.
Staff updated the Fee-in -lieu section to read as follows: “Fees-in-lieu as defined by Town Council
resolution updated every two years, may be provided only for any fractional remainder of the
requirement generated under this chapter totaling less than 1.0 employee, subject to the following
requirements:” Staff feels that this better achieves the intent of the entire section than what was
originally proposed. Along with eliminating the household generated error (discussed at the first
public hearing), a new table on the next page spells out the expected mitigation amount of different
already-existing projects and shows the maximum expected fee associated with on-site buildout.
Below is an investigation of the fee per square foot, which is then used to calculate the fee for left
over employee mitigation, based on the minimum square footage of the smallest unit.
Calculation of Payment in Lieu
80% AMI 100% AMI
Area Median Income for Family of 3 $ 62,640 $ 78,300
Maximum Initial Sales Price $ 213,150 $ 266,156
Affordable Price per square Foot $ 189.25 $ 1,126
Market Price per Square foot $ 350.60 $ 350.60
Administrative Fee 15% 15%
Payment in Lieu per Square Foot $ 186.55 $ 131.43
February 19, 2019 Code Text Amendment Public Hearing
USE Units Emp. Rate Jobs
Jobs/
Emp.
Total
Emp.
Mitigation
Rate
Emp.
Mitigation
Required 3br 2 br 1 br Stud.
Left
Over
80% AMI
Fee
100%
AMI Fee
Lodge/Hotel 190 .8/Rm 144 1.2 120.0 10%12.00
Prop. Managem 0 .4/Rm 0 1.2 0.0 10%0.00
Commercial SF 11,000 2.8 30.8 1.2 25.7 10%2.57
14.57 4 0.57 42,009$ 29,756$
Wyndham
USE Units Emp. Rate Jobs
Jobs/
Emp.
Total
Emp.
Mitigation
Rate
Emp.
Mitigation
Required 3br 2 br 1 br Stud.
Left
Over
80% AMI
Fee
100%
AMI Fee
Lodge/Hotel 74 .8/Rm 59.2 1.2 49.3 10%4.93
Prop. Managem 0 .4/Rm 0 1.2 0.0 10%0.00
Commercial SF 1,956 2.8 5.4768 1.2 4.6 10%0.46
5.39 1 1 0.64 47,481$ 33,632$
USE Units Emp. Rate Jobs
Jobs/
Emp.
Total
Emp.
Mitigation
Rate
Emp.
Mitigation
Required 3br 2 br 1 br Stud.
Left
Over
80% AMI
Fee
100%
AMI Fee
Lodge/Hotel 142 .8/Rm 113.6 1.2 94.7 10%9.47
Prop. Managem 4 .4/Rm 1.6 1.2 1.3 10%0.13
Commercial SF 536 2.8 1.5008 1.2 1.3 10%0.13
9.73 2 1 0.98 72,369$ 51,261$
Colorado World Resorts
USE Units Emp. Rate Jobs
Jobs/
Emp.
Total
Emp.
Mitigation
Rate
Emp.
Mitigation
Required 3br 2 br 1 br Stud.
Left
Over
80% AMI
Fee
100%
AMI Fee
Lodge/Hotel 0 .8/Rm 0 1.2 0.0 10%0.00
Prop. Managem 81 .4/Rm 32.4 1.2 27.0 10%2.70
Commercial SF 0 2.8 0 1.2 0.0 10%0.00
2.70 1 0.95 70,509$ 49,943$
Sheraton Mtn Vista
Lot B Hotel
February 19, 2019 Code Text Amendment Public Hearing
Staff estimates the table on the right to be a fair
representation of the current Inclusionary Zoning/
Commercial Linkage requirements of other jurisdictions.
Staff does not garuntee these numbers but hopes that they
provide a fair estimate of the overall appetite in different
communities.
Staff feels comfortable placing language in the ordinance
that recognizes the Sheridan property’s unique situation
of having already provided twenty (20) units throughout
the original PUD, before a rezoning to Town Center took
place. This is included in the findings and
recommendation section below.
Development Bonus
No new changes are proposed.
Short-term Rentals
Staff corrected an oversight by including a definition of STR in the Definitions section. Originally
the definition was only in the Overlay districts section.
Roof Design
At the last meeting, staff failed to mention changes to the code that already affect roof design in
the Wildridge Subdivision. The codified language is below:
The old reading:
(2) Building Height on Steep Slopes. Determining building height on steep slopes has frequently
resulted in three-story walls on the downhill side that create an overbearing presence on
properties below. Therefore, the visual impact of building height and massing on lots with steep
slopes shall be reduced by articulating the building facades and creating proportional stories in
a multi-story building. Building height will be reduced for buildings or portions of buildings with
flat roofs as follows:
(A) Four-to-twelve (4:12) roof slopes or greater: thirty-five (35) feet.
(B) Less than a four-to-twelve (4:12) roof slope: thirty (30) feet.
The new reading:
(2) Building Height on Steep Slopes. Determining building height on steep slopes has frequently
resulted in three-story walls on the downhill side that create an overbearing presence on
properties below. Therefore, the visual impact of building height and massing on lots with steep
slopes shall be reduced by articulating the building facades and creating proportional stories in
a multi-story building.
(3) Building height will be reduced for buildings or portions of buildings with flat roofs as follows:
(A) Four-to-twelve (4:12) roof slopes or greater: thirty-five (35) feet.
(B) Less than a four-to-twelve (4:12) roof slope: thirty (30) feet.
Jurisdiction
Commercial
Rate
Residential
Rate
Eagle County 45% 45%
Telluride 40% 60%
Vail 20% 10% of GRFA
San Jose, CA 20% 20%
Basalt 20% 25%
San Miguel
County 15% 15%
Snowmass 60% 60%
Aspen/Pitkin 60% 60%
Mt. Crested
Butte ? 15%
Crested Butte none none
Frisco none none
Silverthorne none none
February 19, 2019 Code Text Amendment Public Hearing
This change reinforces the height limitation as discussed and would serve as an additional hurdle
to an Alternative Design application.
Staff also investigated other jurisdictions in the area for their height restrictions.
• Vail’s approach is, “For a flat roof or mansard roof, the height of buildings shall not
exceed thirty feet (30'). For a sloping roof, the height of buildings shall not exceed thirty
three feet (33')” and generally limits roof height in any given district by 3 feet.
• Cordillera Valley Club’s approach is, “A mix of one and two story building masses is
required. Three story masses are discouraged, however, when approved, must be broken
down in scale and have either a one story element or lower roof attached,” and, “Roof
forms shall be limited to low-pitched gable, shed, or double-pitch roofs in the range of 4:12
to 8:12. 3:12 roofs may be allowed, as well as other roof forms, such as curved roofs or
flat roofs, at the discretion of the DRB.”
• The Wildridge design guidelines states, “On open/non-tree covered sites roof pitches shall
approximate slope of the natural contour. The ridge of the roof shall run perpendicular to
the slope. Roof pitches on tree covered lots are not as visible and therefore do not have to
approximate the slope of the ground. A 3:12 roof slope is the minimum for shake roofs”
(The guidelines only allow shake and sod roofs which must contact the ground).
Homes should be designed to complement the site’s landscape. No matter the direction that the
code amendment takes, proper building forms, massing, and overall aesthetic are ultimately in the
eye of the beholder and staff relies on the PZC and Town Council to assist in cases that require
discretion. Staff contends that the adopted (but not yet code) language of the Wildridge code
section protects that special neighborhood in a special way, and a blanket three (3) foot drop, like
that in Vail, is proposed for other residential projects.
Other Changes
For the fire mitigation sections, staff updated the language and the location according to
recommendations from the Eagle County wildfire mitigation coordinator. Also included is a web
link below that summarizes the International Wildland-Urban Interface Code.
CODE TEXT AMENDMENT REVIEW CRITERIA
The review procedures for this application are governed by the Development Code. According to
the AMC §7.16.040(c), Review Criteria, the PZC and Town Council shall use the following
review criteria as the basis for recommendations and decisions on applications to amend the text
of the Development Code:
(1) The text amendment promotes the health, safety and general welfare of the Avon
community;
(2) The text amendment promotes or implements the goals and policies of the Avon
Comprehensive Plan;
(3) The text amendment promotes or implements the purposes stated in the
Development Code; or
(4) The text amendment is necessary or desirable to respond to changed conditions,
new planning concepts or other social or economic conditions.
Staff Response: The amendments are timely in addressing some of the pressing needs of the Town
and the greater Eagle County community. They promote the health, safety and welfare of the
February 19, 2019 Code Text Amendment Public Hearing
community and implement goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan (including the ACHP,
Attachment A) and the Development Code, specifically (n), “Achieve a diverse range of attainable
housing which meets the housing needs created by jobs in the Town, provides a range of housing
types and price points to serve a complete range of life stages and promotes a balanced, diverse
and stable full time residential community which is balanced with the visitor economy.”
AVAILABLE ACTIONS
1. Continue the Public Hearing pending additional information.
2. Approve Findings of Fact and Record of Decision recommending that the Town Council
approve the application.
3. Approve a modified Findings of Fact and Record of Decision recommending that the Town
Council deny the application.
RECOMMENDED MOTION
“I move to recommend that the Avon Town Council approve Case #CTA19001, an application to
amend and update the Avon Municipal Code, with the findings and fact and record of
recommendation attached as Attachment C to Staff’s report.”
ATTACHMENTS
(A) Select PZC Material dated February 5, 2019
(B) Code Text Amendments in order
(C) Findings of Fact and Recommendation for Town Council Approval
LINKS
Town of Avon Community Housing Plan
https://www.avon.org/DocumentCenter/View/18728/Avon-Housing-Plan?bidId=
CAST Vacation Home Rentals Report
https://coskitowns.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/VHR-report-6-12-15-FINAL.pdf
Summary of Inclusionary Zoning Practices in Colorado Communities – Chafee County
http://www.chaffeehousing.org/EndUserFiles/57044.pdf
International Wildland-urban Interface Code
https://codes.iccsafe.org/content/IWUIC2018/effective-use-of-the-international-wildland-
urban-interface-code
To: Planning and Zoning Commission
From: David McWilliams, Town Planner
Meeting Date: February 5, 2019
Topic: Code Text Amendment Public Hearing
INTRODUCTION
Staff has combined several Code Text Amendment proposals for a public hearing. The PZC shall
conduct a public hearing and use the below timeline and criteria on the last pages to recommend
approval or denial of the Avon Municipal Code (AMC) amendment application to the Town Council.
Staff has added some minor amendments that were not part of the recent work sessions, that are shown
in the order they will be added.
Process
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGES
Alternative Design
Staff was directed, through the Strategic Plan, to tie the Alternative Equivalent Compliance (AEC)
process (now re-named Alternative Design) to more tangible public benefits (Attachment D, page
1). Since the work sessions, staff was directed to scale back from a list of those public benefits to
a system that grants the alternative under similar criteria as before. Separately, staff is proposing a
change to roof pitch language because it has been the principle code section that has required AEC
applications.
Employee Housing Mitigation
Staff was directed, through the Avon Community Housing Plan (ACHP, Attachment A), to
determine an approach for inclusionary zoning and commercial linkage. Many communities in
the valley and the state have these programs in an attempt to offset housing from the production
of jobs that a new development generates. Included as Attachment B is a matrix created by the
Eagle County Housing Authority of practices in neighboring communities.
The proposed strategy does not explicitly meet the ACHP income range goal for Area Median
Income (AMI) between 80% -120%, but the units provided are expected to be principally in the
Town Core, and accessible to transit, groceries, and other associated amenities, making them
desirable to a wide array of tenants.
Changes since the PZC work sessions include updated criteria defining the affordability range to
include the above referenced AMI level and specifying the “up or mid valley” as the required
location for the provision of off-site housing. (Attachment C, page 6)
Attachment A, 1
Below is a list of some of the
properties that staff imagines
may be subject to the
inclusionary zoning
requirements in the foreseeable
future. It would not apply to
properties with vested rights (like
the Riverfront or Village at
Avon). They are represented
visually to the left.
Staff analyzed the development scenarios for some recent projects to calculate the estimated
mitigation regime needed. Note that staff interprets the Colorado World Resorts project to be
under the “Property Management” Jobs Generated (.4 jobs per unit) category, as opposed to the
other properties that are under “Lodge/ Hotel” (.8 jobs per unit). These employee units could be
provided through any of the methods found in section 7.20(d).
Building or complex name Address Acres
Square
Feet
Benchmark Shopping Center 82 Beaver Creek Boulevard 2.13 92782.8
1st Bank 11 West Beaver Creek Boulevard 1.714 74661.84
Christy Sports 182 Avon Road 0.928 40423.68
Annex 142 Benchmark 1.496 65165.76
Nottingham Commercial Lots 121 - 111 Nottingham Road 1.067 46478.52
Avon Center Lot C 160 West Beaver Creek Boulevard 2.28 99316.8
160 West Beaver Creek Boulevard 0.583 25395.48
Nottingham Ranch 68-95 Post Boulevard 3.8 165528
Chapel Square parcels 92 Benchmark 2 87120
140 Benchmark 2.864 124755.8
230 Benchmark 1.08 47044.8
Avon Plaza 150 East Beaver Creek Boulevard 1.33 57934.8
North-71 91 Beaver Creek Place 0.57 24829.2
ANB Bank 71 Beaver Creek Place 0.76 33105.6
51 Beaver Creek Place 0.59 25700.4
Attachment A, 2
Sheraton Mtn Vista
USE UNITS EMP. RATE JOBS
JOBS/
EMP. EMPLOYEES
HOUSEHOLD
GEN. UNITS MITIGATION
UNITS
REQUIRED
Lodge/Hotel 190 .8/Rm 144 1.2 120 1.8/per 66.7 10% 6.7
Prop. Mgmt. 0 .4/Rm 0 1.2 0 1.8/per 0.0 10% 0.0
Commercial (SF) 11,000 2.8 30.8 1.2 25.66 1.8/per 14.3 10% 1.4
8.1
Wyndham
USE UNITS EMP. RATE JOBS
JOBS/
EMP. EMPLOYEES
HOUSEHOLD
GEN. UNITS MITIGATION
UNITS
REQUIRED
Lodge/Hotel 74 .8/Rm 59.2 1.2 49.33333 1.8/per 27.4 10% 2.7
Prop. Mgmt. 0 .4/Rm 0 1.2 0 1.8/per 0.0 10% 0.0
Commercial (SF) 1,956 2.8 5.4768 1.2 4.564 1.8/per 2.5 10% 0.3
3.0
Lot B Hotel
USE UNITS EMP. RATE JOBS
JOBS/
EMP. EMPLOYEES
HOUSEHOLD
GEN. UNITS MITIGATION
UNITS
REQUIRED
Lodge/Hotel 142 .8/Rm 113.6 1.2 94.66667 1.8/per 52.6 10% 5.3
Prop. Mgmt. 4 .4/Rm 1.6 1.2 1.333333 1.8/per 0.7 10% 0.1
Commercial (SF) 536 2.8 1.5008 1.2 1.250667 1.8/per 0.7 10% 0.1
5.4
Colorado World Resorts
USE UNITS EMP. RATE JOBS
JOBS/
EMP. EMPLOYEES
HOUSEHOLD
GEN. UNITS MITIGATION
UNITS
REQUIRED
Lodge/Hotel 0 .8/Rm 0 1.2 0 1.8/per 0.0 10% 0.0
Prop. Mgmt. 81 .4/Rm 32.4 1.2 27 1.8/per 15.0 10% 1.5
Commercial (SF) 0 2.8 0 1.2 0 1.8/per 0.0 10% 0.0
1.5
Attachment A, 3
Finally, the fees-in-lieu portion of the process (Attachment C, page 7) is proposed at a maximum
of 50% of the project’s impact requirement. Staff feels that the provision of a housing fund to
tackle its own projects might make sense at this time. As Town Owned Properties planning and
execution is completed, this number could be lowered. The allowed maximum fees-in-lieu portion
is much lower in other communities. Staff is still investigating the type and structure that the fee
should take. A preliminary example (taken from the Eagle County Affordable Housing
Guidelines: Administrative Procedures) is included below. Staff could update this to represent a
different AMI or other factors as appropriate. Likewise, current draft language requires that Town
Council adopt a resolution to determine the fee, but codified language could reference the most
current AMI data available and include and forgo the resolution.
Development Bonus
The Development Bonus section was originally proposed in 2009 as part of the Development Code
overhaul. Staff decided to include this section with edits as a possible appropriate method to gain
additional employee housing or other public benefits when applicants need relief or additions from
the AMC. This is a likely alternative to the PUD process (of negotiated zoning) that should still
combine public benefits with appropriate design.
Since the work session, staff has updated the language to include a housing density bonus
applicable to R-H, where the dimensional standards include a density maximum of dwelling units
per acre. An applicant would have the ability to negotiate an increase the units per acre of the
project based on the provision of affordable units, defined as an AMI of 80% -140%. (Attachment
C, page 10). This example came from Frisco, where the bonus is not part of a negotiated process,
but by-right in certain zone districts near their core.
Short-term Rentals
Staff was directed to determine new short-term rental (STR) regulations to create a more formal
application and compliance process for homeowners. While these documents are not very
different from the ones presented a few weeks ago at the work session, staff encourages a deeper
dive into these proposals than at the previous meeting. (Attachment D, page 11). Since the first
work session, staff edited the complaint / violation process as well as the list of required items to
present for licensing. Staff left health / safety standards within the code and removed others to be
administered as staff policy.
Attachment A, 4
Several local jurisdictions have tried to solve some of their perceived short-term rental issues
through a complaint hotline. Staff initially contemplated including this in the proposed code and
decided against it due to the limited number of properties it would be expected to serve. That is,
compared to other jurisdictions, the number STR taking place outside of a managed property
(Westin, Falcon Point, etc.) are low. A hotline would be an unnecessary expense and
administrative burden that would not serve many people. While a STR agent is required in case
of emergencies within a unit, (plumbing, smoke alarms etc.) reliance on the Police Department for
other types of issues (noise) will still be the standard practice. Staff contemplates a violation
protocol where the subject properties are cross referenced to monthly police call records to
determine if any rentals are causing problems.
While not proposed, staff has heard mention by some stakeholders that a specific tax on STR to
provide affordable housing might be an appropriate approach to balance the needs of homeowners
and the community’s needs for housing. Staff could produce this addition if deemed necessary.
That is, in a case like the Colorado World Resorts project, the building is constructed for condos
but the expectation is that many of the units will be rented short-term. By including a STR
affordable housing tax, the externalities may be captured and mitigated by town-funded activities.
Roof Design
In recent years, the AMC has consistently been stretched with respects to roof pitch. Specifically,
the “mountain modern” aesthetic (clean lines, unique shapes, large windows, and connections with
outdoors), oftentimes clash with the requirements of the code. Staff feels a revision that achieves
the intent of the original code while allowing for new design types may be in order. The proposal
would allow 3:12 pitches as the primary roof pitch while limiting the height of the roof, therefore
avoiding the potential of a tall, box shaped house.
Other Changes
Staff has prepared additional language to various Code sections, to better respond to best practices
and changing situations. Specifically, wildfire mitigation is addressed in the Subdivision and
Landscape sections. Chapter 8.36 changes to include sight distance triangles into the scope of
removal/control are not subject to a PZC hearing but are included for review and recommendation.
CODE TEXT AMENDMENT REVIEW CRITERIA
The review procedures for this application are governed by the Development Code. According to
the AMC §7.16.040(c), Review Criteria, the PZC and Town Council shall use the following
review criteria as the basis for recommendations and decisions on applications to amend the text
of the Development Code:
(1) The text amendment promotes the health, safety and general welfare of the Avon
community;
(2) The text amendment promotes or implements the goals and policies of the Avon
Comprehensive Plan;
(3) The text amendment promotes or implements the purposes stated in the Development
Code; or
(4) The text amendment is necessary or desirable to respond to changed conditions,
new planning concepts or other social or economic conditions.
Staff Response: The amendments are timely in addressing some of the pressing needs of the Town
and the greater Eagle County community. They promote the health, safety and welfare of the
community and implement goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan (including the ACHP,
Attachment A, 5
Attachment A) and the Development Code, specifically the (n), Achieve a diverse range of
attainable housing which meets the housing needs created by jobs in the Town, provides a range
of housing types and price points to serve a complete range of life stages and promotes a balanced,
diverse and stable full time residential community which is balanced with the visitor economy.”
AVAILABLE ACTIONS
1. Continue the Public Hearing pending additional information.
2. Approve Findings of Fact and Record of Decision recommending that the Town Council
approve the application.
3. Approve a modified Findings of Fact and Record of Decision recommending that the
Town Council deny the application.
RECOMMENDED MOTION
“I move to recommend that the Avon Town Council approve Case #CTA19001, an application to
amend and update the Avon Municipal Code, with the findings and fact and record of
recommendation attached as Attachment D to Staff’s report.”
ATTACHMENTS
(A) Sections from the Town of Avon Community Housing Plan
(B) Eagle County Housing Tools Matrix
(C) Code Text Amendments for review
(D) Code Text Amendment Recommendation for Approval
LINKS
Town of Avon Community Housing Plan
https://www.avon.org/DocumentCenter/View/18728/Avon-Housing-Plan?bidId=
CAST Vacation Home Rentals Report
https://coskitowns.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/VHR-report-6-12-15-FINAL.pdf
Summary of Inclusionary Zoning Practices in Colorado Communities – Chafee County
http://www.chaffeehousing.org/EndUserFiles/57044.pdf
Attachment A, 6
The Comprehensive Plan:
• Achieve a diverse range of housing densities, styles, and types, including rental
and for sale, to serve all segments of the population.
• Coordinate with neighboring communities to provide an attainable housing
program that incorporates both rental and ownership opportunities, affordable for
local working families.
Goals and Objectives of this Housing Plan are as follows:
• Focus on increasing deed restricted homeownership opportunities for households
making equivalent of 140% or less of the Area Median Income - $430,000 for a
household of three people in 2018.
• Grow the inventory of homeownership and “missing middle” inventory, in place of
additional rental housing stock, to create a more balanced portfolio with a long-
term goal of 50% rental, 50% ownership.
• When considering new rental housing, prioritize price point, quality and amenities
attractive to “step up” renters and seniors looking to downsize, focusing on the 80-
120% AMI level.
• Stabilize or increase the percentage of year-round residents; currently 55% of all
dwelling units in Avon are occupied by year-round residents.
• Stabilize or increase the percentage of Eagle County working residents Avon.
• Seek to add at deed restricted units to the inventory in the short term.
• Strengthen regional partnerships with other communities and entities (i.e. Habitat
for Humanity, other municipalities, Eagle County) to make projects happen.
• As sites redevelop, strive for “no net loss” of units in the 80-120% AMI range, and
when possible, increase housing serving the local year-round population.
• Re-evaluate goals and objectives on an annual basis, including the ongoing
monitoring of new projects and housing stock in the mid-valley; appendices may
be updated by Resolution.
Strengths and Assets
• An inventory of 670 price-controlled housing units, 63 of which are deed
restricted for sale units that were a result of successful PUD negotiations;
Policy
• Update mitigation/linkage policies to be more proactive in addressing housing
needs. Current policies are limited to very narrowly defined locations and
development requests, and the current mitigation rate is low compared with peer
communities.
• Consider implementing an inclusionary housing policy. Inclusionary housing
was considered in the 2010 code update, but was not adopted at that time.
Inclusionary housing is a tool to create housing affordable to locals. It is
recommended to look at inclusionary housing and mitigation/linkage at the same
time, to better understand how the two tools complement each other, support
Attachment A, 7
policy goals, and maintain a level playing field for commercial and residential
development.
Inclusionary
Housing
A percentage of residential units in new
subdivisions/PUDs are workforce housing. Market
homes support workforce units. Only effective if new
subdivisions/PUDs are developed/ redeveloped.
Carbondale, Eagle,
Eagle County, San
Miguel County
Linkage/Mitigation Requiring new residential and/or commercial
development to contribute to workforce housing
relative to demand generated by the new
construction. For residential, mitigation rate often
increases with house size, and deed restricted units
are typically exempt. Fees in lieu provides revenue
stream that fluctuates with building activity.
Documented relationship between fee and impact
required.
Telluride, Aspen, Mt.
Crested Butte
Attachment A, 8
Attachment A, 9
Attachment A, 10
Attachment B, 1
Attachment C, 1
7.08.010 - General definitions.
Short Term Rental means the rental of property for a total continuous duration of less than thirty (30)
days.
7.16.070 - Subdivisions.
(e) Preliminary Plan Review Criteria. The reviewing authority will use the following review criteria as the
basis for recommendations and decisions on applications for preliminary plan subdivision applications:
(1) The proposed subdivision shall comply with all applicable use, density, development and design
standards set forth in this Development Code that have not otherwise been modified or waived
pursuant to this Chapter and that would affect or influence the layout of lots, blocks and streets.
Applicants shall not create lots or patterns of lots in the subdivision that will make compliance with
such development and design standards difficult or infeasible;
(2) The subdivision application shall comply with the purposes of this Development Code;
(3) The subdivision application shall be consistent with the Avon Comprehensive Plan and other
community planning documents;
(4) The land shall be physically suitable for the proposed development or subdivision;
(5) The proposed subdivision shall be compatible with surrounding land uses;
(6) There are adequate public facilities for potable water supply, sewage disposal, solid waste
disposal, electrical supply, fire protection and roads and will be conveniently located in relation to
schools, police, fire protection and emergency medical services;
(7) The proposed utility and road extensions are consistent with the utility's service plan and are
consistent with the Avon Comprehensive Plan and Comprehensive Transportation Master Plan;
(8) The utility lines are sized to serve the ultimate population of the service area to avoid future land
disruption to upgrade under-sized lines;
(9) The subdivision is compatible with the character of existing land uses in the area and shall not
adversely affect the future development of the surrounding area;
(10) A proposed subdivision for an existing PUD shall be consistent with the relevant PUD Master
Plan as reflected in the approval of that PUD;
(11) Appropriate utilities, including water, sewer, electric, gas and telephone utilities, shall provide a
"conditional capacity to serve" letter for the proposed subdivision;
(12) That the general layout of lots, roads, driveways, utilities, drainage facilities and other services
within the proposed subdivision shall be designed in a way that minimizes the amount of land
disturbance, minimize inefficiencies in the development of services, maximizes the amount of
open space in the development, preserves existing trees/vegetation and riparian areas, reduces
wildfire fuel density and form, protects critical wildlife habitat and otherwise accomplishes the
purposes of this Development Code;
Attachment B, 2
Attachment C, 2
(13) Evidence that provision has been made for a public sewage disposal system or, if other methods
of sewage disposal are proposed, adequate evidence that such system shall comply with state
and local laws and regulations;
(14) Evidence that all areas of the proposed subdivision that may involve soil or topographical
conditions presenting hazards or requiring special precautions have been identified by the
applicant and that the proposed use of these areas are compatible with such conditions or that
adequate mitigation is proposed;
(15) The subdivision application addresses the responsibility for maintaining all roads, open spaces
and other public and common facilities in the subdivision and that the Town can afford any
proposed responsibilities to be assumed by the Town;
(16) If applicable, the declarations and owners' association are established in accordance with the
law and are structured to provide adequate assurance that any site design standards required by
this Development Code or conditions of approval for the proposed subdivision will be maintained
or performed in a manner which is enforceable by the Town; and
(17) As applicable, the proposed phasing for development of the subdivision is rational in terms of
available infrastructure capacity and financing.
Attachment B, 3
Attachment C, 3
Table 7.16-1:
Development Review Procedures and Review Authority
Procedure Director PZC TC
Comprehensive Plan Amendment (§7.16.030) R H-R H-D
Code Text Amendment (§7.16.040) R H-R H-D
Rezoning (§7.16.050) R H-R H-D
Planned Unit Development
(§7.16.060)
Administrative PUD D A
Minor PUD Amendment R H-R H-D
Lot Split PUD Amendment for
Wildridge PUD R H-R H-D
Major PUD Amendment R H-R H-D
Preliminary PUD R H-R H-D
Final PUD R H H-D
Subdivision (§7.16.070)
Administrative Subdivision D A
Minor Subdivision D A
Preliminary Plan R H-R H-D
Final Plan R H-D
Development Plan (§7.16.080)
Minor D or R H-D A
Major R H-D A
Major in Town Core R H-R H-D
Design Review (§7.16.090) D or R H-R or H-
D
H-D or
A
Attachment B, 4
Attachment C, 4
Special Review Use (§7.16.100) R H-D A
Variance (§7.16.110) R H-D A
Alternative Equivalent Compliance Design (§7.16.120) R R-D or R A or R-
D
Right-of-way Vacation (§7.16.130) R H-D
Vested Property Right (§7.16.040) R H-R H-D
Location, Character and Extent (§7.16.150) R H-D A
Annexation (§7.36) R H-R H-D
Appeal (§7.16.160) H-D
1041 Permit (§7.40) R H-R H-D
Historic and/or Cultural Preservation Designated (§7.50) H-D
Attachment B, 5
Attachment C, 5
7.16.120 - Alternative designequivalent compliance.
Alternative designequivalent compliance is a procedure that encourages creative and original design
where the site conditions or proposed use prevent strict compliance with allows development to meet the
intent of the design-related provisions of this Chapterthrough an alternative design. It is not a general waiver
or weakening of regulations; rather, this application procedure permits a site-specific plan that is equal to
or better than the strict application of a design standard specified in this Development Code. This procedure
is not intended as a substitute for a variance or administrative modification or a vehicle for relief from
standards in this Chapter. Alternative designcompliance shall apply only to the specific site for which it is
requested and does not establish a precedent for assured approval of other requests.
(a) Applicability. A request for alternative designequivalent compliance shall be made concurrently with
a site-specific application for a procedure identified in this Chapter. The alternative designequivalent
compliance procedure shall be available only for the following sections of this Development Code:
(1) Section 7.20.100, Employee Housing Mitigation;
(2) Section 7.28.040, Mobility and Connectivity;
(3) Section 7.28.050, Landscaping;
(4) Section 7.28.060, Screening;
(5) Section 7.28.070, Retaining Walls;
(6) Section 7.28.080, Fences;
(7) Section 7.28.090, Design Standards; and
(8) Section 7.32.040, Paved Trail Design.
(b) Review Alternative design Procedures. Applications for alternative designequivalent compliance shall
be processed concurrently with the underlying development application for which alternative
designequivalent compliance with the applicable design standards is desired and shall follow the
procedures for such underlying development application. Applicants are generally required to define
the alternative design element(s), show a concept plan or similar visual aid with the proposed deviation
and a design that would be allowed by code, and respond to the review criteria, below. Applications
for alternative equivalent compliance may be initiated by the owner of property for which alternative
equivalent compliance is desired.
(c) Review Authority. The review authority shall be the review authority as set forth for the underlying
development application. The PZC shall review all alternative designequivalent compliance
applications that have a concurrent minor development plan application.
(d) Review Criteria. The review authority shall use the following review criteria as the basis for a decision
on an application for alternative designequivalent compliance:
(1) The proposed alternative achieves the intent of the subject design or development standard to
the same or better degree than the subject standard;
(2) The proposed alternative achieves the Goals, and Policies, and District Planning Principles of
the Avon Comprehensive Plan to the same or better degree than the subject standard;
(3) The proposed alternative results in benefits to the community that are equivalent to or
better than compliance with the subject standard; and The proposed alternative design will not
negatively impact public health and safety; and
(4) The proposed alternative imposes no greater impacts on adjacent properties than would occur
through compliance with the specific requirements of this Title.
(e) Conditions. The reviewing authority may recommend or impose conditions on an approval for
alternative designequivalent compliance provided that such conditions are related to ensuring the
performance of the alternative designequivalent compliance to meet or exceed the subject standard.
Attachment B, 6
Attachment C, 6
Such conditions may include performance guarantees, required timeframes or the ability to revoke an
approval for alternative designequivalent compliance.
(f) Effect of Approval. Alternative designequivalent compliance shall apply only to the specific site for
which it is requested and shall not establish a precedent for approval of other requests.
Attachment B, 7
Attachment C, 7
7.20.100 - Employee housing mitigation.
(a) Applicability.
The standards of this Section shall apply to new multi-family (3 or more units), commercial,
accommodation units, and other non-residential development within the Town of Avon. Governmental and
non-profit entities must also adhere to these standards.
(b) Exemptions.
(1) Redevelopment of Pre-Existing Use and Change in Use.
Redevelopment or remodeling of an existing use or the change from one use to another is
exempt from the requirements of this Section, provided such activity does not create additional
employment generation as determined by Table 7.20-14, below. Only the uses and floor areas
that existed prior to the redevelopment or remodeling shall be exempt from the requirements of
this Section. Any new floor area or unit or any change in use which creates additional employee
generation as determined by Table 7.20-14 shall be subject to the provisions of this Section.
(2) Vested Property Rights are exempted from the provisions of this Section.
(c) When applicable, employee housing mitigation shall be provided in accordance with these standards:
To determine the number of employee housing units that must be provided, the following formulas
shall be used:
Table 7.20-14
Employee Housing Mitigation Formulas
Factor Calculation
Commercial
Size of development Leasable square feet
Jobs generated 2.8 per 1,000 sq. ft. Rate x sq. ft./1,000
Employees generated 1.2 jobs per employee Jobs generated/1.2
Households generated 1.8 employees per unit Employees generated/1.8
Units requiredEmployee
Mitigation Required 10% mitigation Households Jobs generated x
10%
Lodging and Property Management
Size of development # of rooms or # of units
Jobs generated
Lodge/hotel - # of rooms x 0.8
0.8/ room;
Prop. management - # of units x 0.4
0.4/ unit
Employees generated 1.2 jobs per employee Jobs generated/ 1.2
Households generated 1.8 employees per unit Employees generated/ 1.8
Units requiredEmployee
Mitigation Required 10% mitigation Households Jobs generated x
10%
Attachment B, 8
Attachment C, 8
Residential
Size of development # of Dwelling Units
Jobs generated .33 per dwelling unit # of units x 0.33
Employees generated 1.2 jobs per employee Jobs generated/1.2
Employee Mitigation
Required 10% mitigation Jobs generated x 10%
Note: The required employee housing mitigation shall be rounded to the nearest whole
number.
(d) Methods of Housing Mitigation.
General Requirements. All units shall be placed under a deed restriction, administered by the Valley Home
Store, that limits occupancy or ownership of units to Eagle County residents or workers.
For any of the following Housing Mitigation Methods, all proposed unit(s) shall comply with the minimum size
requirements shown in table 7.20-15, and all applicable design requirements.
TABLE 7.20-15
Minimum Size of Housing Units
Type Minimum Size of Unit (SF)
Number of
Employees
Housed
Studio 500 1.25
1 bedroom 750 1.75
2 bedroom 800 2.25
3 or more bedroom 1,225 3.5
No Credit Given: If the gross residential floor area (GRFA) of the proposed unit(s) is in excess of the
minimum required gross residential floor area (GRFA), the additional gross residential floor area (GRFA)
shall not be eligible for use as any form of future credit or for the commercial linkage or inclusionary zoning
employee housing mitigation.
(1) Construction of unit(s) on the site on which the development is proposed.
(2) Construction of deed restricted unit(s) within the Town of Avon, provided such land, site or
structure has not been previously deed-restricted to employee or affordable housing by any party.
(3) Construction of unit(s) outside the Town of Avon but within the Eagle Valley, provided such land,
site or structure has not been previously deed-restricted to employee or affordable housing by any
party. Prior to construction of such unit(s), consent of the relevant jurisdiction or homeowner’s
association (if required) to placement of a deed restriction on the unit(s) must be obtained, in
addition to any required land use approvals. Units outside of the Town of Avon must be within the
80% - 140% AMI range, as defined by the Avon Comprehensive Plan, within the Up or Mid Valley,
as defined by the Eagle River Valley Housing Needs and Solutions plan.
(4) Deed restricting existing free market unit(s) within the Town or the Eagle Valley.
i. As a condition of approval when the deed restriction of existing free market unit(s) is
proposed, Applicants must obtain the approval of The Town for the specific unit(s) to be
deed restricted. Applicants must demonstrate to the satisfaction of The Town that (a) the
long-term affordability of the proposed unit(s) is adequately protected, considering issues
Attachment B, 9
Attachment C, 9
including but not limited to long term maintenance and homeowner’s assessments; and (b)
the affected property does not prohibit the type of housing proposed. The Town may
request additional inform ation about the proposed unit(s) as reasonable to make such a
determination. Such approval may contain provisions to ensure that any unit(s) so
restricted meets long term standards for maintenance and affordability.
ii. Units outside of the Town of Avon must be within the 80% - 140% AMI range, as defined
by the Avon Comprehensive Plan, within the Up or Mid Valley, as defined by the Eagle
River Valley Housing Needs and Solutions plan.
iii. Prior to deed restriction of such unit(s) when located outside the Town, consent of the
relevant jurisdiction or homeowner’s association (if required) to placement of a deed
restriction on the unit(s) must be obtained, in addition to any required land use approvals.
(5) Fees-in-lieu as defined by Town Council resolution updated every two years, may be provided
provide only for any fractional remainder of the requirement generated under this chapter totaling
less than 1.0 employee, subject to the following requirements:
i. Time of Payment and Use of Funds. Payment of the in-lieu fee shall be made to the
Town prior to the issuance of any building permits for the free market portion of the
development.
ii. Interest Bearing Account. The Town shall transfer the funds to an interest-bearing
account.
iii. Authorized Uses of Fees. The funds, and any interest accrued, shall be used only for the
purpose of planning for, subsidizing or developing affordable and employee housing.
iv. Refund of Fees.
(A) Seven Year Limit. Fees collected pursuant to this section may be returned to the
then present owner or property for which a fee was paid, if the fees have not been spent
within seven (7) years from the date fees were paid, unless the Town Council shall have
earmarked the funds for expenditure on a specific project, in which case the Town
Council may extend the time period by up to three (3) more years.
(B) Written Request. To obtain the refund, the present owner must submit a written
request to the Director within one (1) year following the end of the seventh (7th) year
from the date payment was received.
(C) Payments Determined. For the purpose of this section, payments collected shall
be deemed spent on the basis that the first payment shall be the first payment out.
(e) Housing mitigation plan required.
The housing mitigation plan shall include the following:
(1) Calculation and method. The calculation of, and method by which housing is to be provided, in
compliance with Table 7.20-14 and Section 7.20.100(d).
(2) Unit Descriptions. If deed restricted housing units are to be developed, a site plan and building
floor plans (if applicable), illustrating the number of units proposed, their location, the number of
bedrooms, gross floor area of each unit, and the rental/sale mix of the development.
Attachment B, 10
Attachment C, 10
(3) Timing of review/amendments. The housing mitigation plan shall be submitted to and approved
by the Director prior to, or concurrent with, application to the Town for the free market portion of
the initial development plan. Review and approval of plans by the Town for construction of
affordable housing shall be prior to, or concurrent with, the free market portion of the
development plan. Any amendment to the housing mitigation plan shall require Director approval.
(f) Certification of Action. The Director, or its designee, shall certify the approval, approval with conditions,
or denial of the housing mitigation plan, or of an amendment thereto. Such approval, approval with
conditions, or denial shall be based on compliance with the provisions of this Division, unless an
exception is granted by variance.
(g) Appeal. Upon final approval or denial of the housing mitigation plan by the Director an appeal to Town
Council may be filed pursuant to Section 7.16.160 - Appeal.
(2) Employee housing units shall be located on-site. The applicant may propose alternatives to on-
site employee housing mitigation in accordance with the alternative equivalent compliance
process set forth in Section 7.16.120. When considering proposals for off-site employee housing,
preference shall be given to locations closer to the applicant's property, locations in the Town and
locations which are served by mass transit.
(3) Employee housing units shall be owned by the owner of the commercial space for which the
employee housing units serve and shall be used exclusively by employees of such commercial
space; or employee housing units shall be offered for sale subject to a deed restriction that
restricts the appreciation of price and which restricts eligible buyers and renters in accordance
with the form of price controlled housing deed restriction adopted by the Town. Applicants may
voluntarily propose to meet the employee housing units with rent controlled units through the
alternative equivalent compliance process.
(4) Employee housing mitigation shall be satisfied by providing one (1) residential studio unit, one
(1) bedroom in a residential unit or any combination thereof, for each required employee housing
unit of mitigation. The minimum size for a studio unit shall be five hundred (500) square feet and
the minimum size for a one-bedroom residential unit shall be seven hundred fifty (750) square
feet.
Attachment B, 11
Attachment C, 11
7.20.110 Development bonus.
Definitions. For this section:
Development bonus means an incentive-based tool that permits a project increased height, lot coverage
(for the Town Center District), building height, reduced parking minimums, reduced building permit fees,
increased residential density (in the Residential High Density RH district) reduced landscape area, or
landscape unit requirements; in exchange for helping the community achieve the public policy goals as
defined below.
Development bonus type means the offer provided by the proposal for consideration by the review
authority that corresponds to one of the listed in section (e), below.
(a) Purpose. Development bonuses may be awarded for proposed development projects in the Town
Center, Mixed-Use Commercial, Neighborhood Commercial, and Residential High-Density zone
districts where the application meets Town goals and complies with minimum development standards
and requirements. A development bonus may be allowed where the negative impacts of such allowance
on the public or on adjacent property owners do not outweigh the benefits to the public. The public
benefits identified in this section are related to promoting the viability and functionality of higher density
and more intense site development. Development bonuses that provide housing are preferred.
(b) Applicability. Development bonuses are only allowed for consideration where the applicant has
demonstrated substantial
(c) Procedures. An application for a development bonus shall be submitted concurrently with the principle
application for development of the property and shall follow the review procedures, notice requirements,
and hearing requirements of the underlying development application. A public hearing and
recommendation by PZC, followed by a public hearing by Town Council is required before the Town
Council takes action on any application for a development bonus. A development bonus shall only be
effective and binding on the Town if stated in a development agreement which contains provisions
stating that the development bonus is contingent upon the performance and completion by the applicant
property owner of any public facilities, public improvements and/or conveyance of a property interest
for public facilities or improvements offered for the development bonus.
(d) Criteria. The following criteria for specific public benefits shall be considered when evaluating
development bonuses:
(1) General criteria.
(i) Absolute maximum. The absolute cumulative maximum potential development bonus
shall be a variation of 20% from the standard required in the development code, except
for Section 7.22.110(e)(1)(i) and (ii).
(ii) Cumulative development bonuses. Subject to the absolute maximum for development
bonus stated in sub-section (i) above, multiple development bonuses may be awarded
by the Town Council and may be applied cumulatively to a property.
(iii) Additional water rights dedication. Additional water rights shall be dedicated for any
development bonus which increases the water consumption for the property and such
additional water rights dedication shall not be considered as a dedication of surplus water
right as defined in Development Review Type 6, below.
(iv) Council review and approval. Approval of a development bonus, if any, shall be
determined by Town Council in the Town Council’s discretion after considering the
Attachment B, 12
Attachment C, 12
Review Criteria. Approval of a development bonus shall be by ordinance and shall be
documented in a development agreement.
(2) Review Criteria. The PZC and Town Council shall consider the following criteria as the basis
for a recommendation or decision for a development bonus proposal.
(i) Exceed minimum standards of one or more of the development bonus types. A
development bonus may only be considered and awarded where the development bonus
type exceeds the minimum requirements established elsewhere in the Development
Code.
(ii) Promote Town goals and policies. The public benefits shall generally promote or
implement the goals or policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan and purposes stated in
this Development Code.
(iii) Payment-in-lieu. For all development bonus types, where an on-site contribution or land
dedication is not practical or appropriate, the Town Council may consider a cash
contribution towards such facility or improvement by a payment-in-lieu of dedication. The
amount of the payment-in-lieu shall be calculated by considering current and projected
real estate values and construction costs. The amount of a payment-in-lieu should be
the equivalent value of an on-site dedication considering the additional administrative,
transaction, financing and timeframe costs associated with properly utilizing cash
proceeds.
(iv) Mitigation of impacts. The reviewing authority may require an analysis and may require
mitigation of the additional impacts of a development bonus on all public facilities,
infrastructure, and services which serve the property, including but not limited to public
infrastructure, streets, additional water rights required to serve the development, fire
protection, ambulance services, schools, parks, and recreation. In addition, where a
development bonus may result in negative impacts to adjacent or nearby properties or
impacts to the general public, the Town may require mitigation of such impacts as a
condition to granting the development bonus.
(v) Location and design. The location and design of any contribution towards public parking,
transit, pedestrian enhancement, streetscape improvement, or civic facility shall be in
conformance with the Town of Avon’s Comprehensive Plan and other applicable plans
and regulations of the Town, shall be acceptable to the Town taking into consideration
functionality, current and projected demand, and long term maintenance and operation
costs, and shall include such legal documents as are deemed necessary and acceptable
to the Town.
(e) Development bonus types
(1) Housing. A development bonus may be awarded that meets the following criteria:
(i) A density bonus where:
(A) A minimum of 50 percent of the total number of bonus units is provided within the
80% - 140% Area Median Income (AMI) range;
(B) For each additional dwelling unit allowed, at least two housing units at within the
80% - 140% AMI range, as defined by the Avon Comprehensive Plan, are provided
on property outside of the subject property, but within the Town or within one mile
of any corporate limit of the Town;
(C) Payment-in-lieu for providing affordable housing based upon existing real estate
values, market conditions, market trends, the anticipated timeframe to utilize funds
to secure and provide housing, transactional costs and administrative costs for the
Attachment B, 13
Attachment C, 13
Town to secure and provide housing, and determined by the Town Council fees-
in-lieu resolution updated every two years; or,
(ii) A reduction of building fees may be allowed for the provision of housing units within the
80% - 140% AMI range.
(iii) Other development bonuses may be made in all applicable zone districts through the
provision of affordable housing or a payment-in-lieu.
(2) LEED certification or similar certification demonstrating high building efficiency performance.
A development bonus may be awarded for certification.
(3) Public parking or transit contribution. A development bonus may be awarded for contributions
towards public parking and/or transit.
(4) Pedestrian enhancements. The following criteria shall be considered for development
bonuses for pedestrian enhancements:
(i) Off-site pedestrian enhancements shall be no further than 2,500 feet (as measured by the
most direct existing or planned pedestrian routes) from the property boundary of the
development.
(ii) On-site pedestrian enhancements shall be open to the public and shall be owned and
maintained by the property owner or an owners’ association.
(5) Streetscape enhancements. A development bonus may be awarded for streetscape
enhancements. Streetscape enhancements may include plazas, courtyards, fountains,
public art, benches, tables, kiosks, pocket parks, play areas and other enhancements to
public pedestrian areas. The following criteria shall be considered for development bonuses
for streetscape enhancements:
(i) Streetscape enhancement shall be no further away than 1,500 feet from the property
boundary.
(ii) On-site streetscape enhancements shall be open to the public and shall be owned and
maintained by the property owner or an owners’ association.
(iii) Civic facility. A development bonus may be awarded for the provision of land or
improvements for civic facilities. Civic facilities may include a library, health clinic,
municipal facilities, performing arts venues, or other facilities which are open to the public
and promote the health, safety, welfare or culture of the Avon community. The civic facility
shall be located on-site or, if off-site, shall be within a reasonable proximity of the property
to benefit the property.
(6) Water rights dedication. A development bonus may be awarded for the provision of surplus
water rights which exceed the water rights dedication required to serve the property.
Attachment B, 14
Attachment C, 14
7.20.090 - Overlay districts.
(a) Short Term Rental Overlay - STRO.
(1) Intention. The Short Term Rental Overlay (STRO) zone district is intended to allow short term rentals
of properties, including but not limited to accommodation, apartments, bed and breakfast,
condominium, hotel, lodge, motel and residential properties for periods fewer than thirty (30) days
subject to the provisions of this Chapter. The STRO zone district shall be an overlay zone district
which shall apply to allow short term rentals of properties. Properties in the STRO zone district
shall otherwise be subject to all requirements of the underlying zone district.
(2) Allowed Use. The following uses shall be permitted in the STRO District:
(i) The uses permitted in the underlying zone district or planned unit development (PUD).
(ii) Short term rental, except that short term rental use shall not be permitted for any residential
unit which is deed restricted for affordable housing, long term residential use, primary
residential use or full time residential use.
(3) Short Term Rental. For the purpose of this Chapter, short term rental shall mean the rental of
property for a total continuous duration of less than thirty (30) days.
(43) Development Standards. The developments standards within this overlay zone district are
regulated by the underlying zone district.
(b4) Planned Unit Development. All PUD zone districts shall comply to the dimensional and
development standards as well as the review processes and criteria outlined in Section 7.16.060,
Planned Unit Developments.
(5) Sales and Public Accommodations Tax Licenseing. Any property owner who leases or rents
property in the STRO District shall obtain a sales tax license in accordance with Chapter 3.08
and a public accommodations tax short-term rental license in accordance with Chapter 3.28. The
failure to obtain proper licensing a sales tax license or public accommodations tax license prior to
using property for short term rental in the STRO shall be a violation and subject to penalties as
described in Title 3.
(6) This chapter shall not supersede or affect any private conditions, covenants or restrictions
applicable to a short-term rental property.
Attachment B, 15
Attachment C, 15
Chapter 7.24.050 – Use-specific regulations.
(e) Short-Term rental. A short-term rental must comply with the following limitations and conditions:
(1) No license shall be issued without an affidavit, signed by the owner or designee under penalty of
perjury, certifying that the short-term rental property is in habitable condition and complies with
the health and safety standards set forth in this chapter. Within thirty (30) days of receipt of a
complete application for a short-term rental license, if the Director finds that the application
complies with this chapter, the Director shall issue a short-term rental license. The license shall
be issued in the name of the owner or designee, and shall not be transferable.
(2) Local Agent Required. Each owner shall appoint a natural person or property management firm
located within a sixty (60) minute distance of the short-term rental property that is available at all
times for the duration of rental occupation, to serve as the local agent for the short-term rental
property. The owner shall notify the Finance Director or designee in writing of the appointment of
a local agent within five (5) days of such appointment or modification of any such appointment.
(3) If the proposed short-term rental property is located within a duplex, the application shall include
a copy of a written notice provided to the last known address of the record owner of the adjoining
residential dwelling unit. The written notice shall include a copy of the completed application, and
shall be sent by first-class United States mail at least seven (7) days prior to the filing of the
application.
(4) Notice. Any notice required by this chapter to be given to an owner is sufficient if sent by first-
class mail to the address provided by the owner on the most recent license or renewal
application. Notice given to the local agent, by first-class mail to the address provided by the
owner, shall also be sufficient to satisfy any required notice to the owner under this chapter.
(5) Health and Safety Standards. Buildings, structures or rooms shall not be used for purposes other
than those for which they were designed or intended.
(i) Roofs, floors, walls, foundations, ceilings, stairs, handrails, guardrails, doors, porches,
all other structural components, and all appurtenances thereto shall be capable of
resisting any and all forces and loads to which they may be normally subjected, and
shall be kept in sound condition and in good repair.
(ii) Smoke detectors, carbon monoxide detectors and fire extinguishers shall be installed
and operable, and all wood-burning fireplaces and stoves shall be cleaned on an
annual basis.
(iii) An operable toilet, sink, and either a bathtub or shower shall be located within the same
building, and every room containing a toilet or bathtub/shower shall be completely
enclosed by walls, doors, or windows that will afford sufficient privacy.
(6) Infractions.
(i) If an infraction is found to have occurred during the routine compliance operations of Town
staff, a formal complaint shall be sent to the owner describing in detail the violation(s) of
this chapter alleged to have occurred on the short-term rental property within three (3)
business days.
(ii) If there are three (3) or more infractions issued for the same short-term rental property
within any consecutive twelve-month period, the Town Manager or designee may fine the
licensee for that short-term rental property upon written notice to the owner. Fine for first
infraction: $500; second $1,500; third or more $2,500.
Attachment B, 16
Attachment C, 16
(7) Revocation. The Town Manager or designee shall revoke any short-term rental license that was
issued in error or the recipient of multiple violations. Revocation duration shall be for one (1) year.
The Town shall notify an owner, in writing, of any revocation and the reasons therefor. The owner
may appeal any revocation by filing a written appeal with the Town Manager or designee within ten
(10) days of the date of the revocation notice. In the written appeal, the owner shall describe the
reason for the appeal, and may request a hearing before the Town Manager or designee. The
hearing shall be informal, and may be conducted in person or by telephone, at the discretion of the
Town Manager or designee. At the hearing, the owner shall have the opportunity to be heard on
the revocation. Within ten (10) days of the hearing, the Town Manager or designee shall either
uphold or reverse the revocation, in writing. The decision of the Town Manager or designee shall
be final.
(8) Violation and Penalty.
(i) It is unlawful for any owner, local agent or occupant of a short-term rental property to violate
any provision of this chapter or any other applicable provision of this Code.
(ii) Any person violating any of the provisions of this chapter shall be subject to the penalties
above and also those contained in Chapter 1.09 of this Municipal Code. Any remedies
provided for in this Section shall be cumulative and not exclusive and shall be in addition to
any other remedies provided by law. The imposition of any penalty under this Code shall not
preclude the Town or affected property owner from instituting any appropriate action or
proceeding to require compliance with the provisions of this Code.
Attachment B, 17
Attachment C, 17
7.28.050 - Landscaping.
(5) Planting Plan Required. All planting plans must note and delineate all planting and sod areas,
and include hydrozones with similar microclimate, soil conditions, slope, and plant materials with
similar water demand. Individual hydrozones that mix high and low water use plants shall not be
permitted. Hydrozone areas shall be designated by number, letter, or other designation on the
landscape design plan and irrigation design plan. The plan shall comply with the International
Wildland-Urban Interface Code.
(vi) Soil Amendment.
(A) Topsoil of irrigated grasses (including turf), shrubs, perennials, and annuals shall be a
sandy loam to a depth of at least six (6) inches containing at least five percent (5%) organic
matter by volume.
(B) Amended tree soil should have a minimum planting hole diameter of two (2) times as large
as the root ball diameter. Both topsoil and subsoil layers shall be sandy loam. The topsoil
shall be at least six (6) inches and have five percent (5%) organic matter by weight and
subsoil shall have at least one to three percent (1 - 3%) organic matter by weight.
(C) A minimum of four (4) cubic yards of organic matter soil amendment per one-thousand
square feet of landscaped area shall be required as necessary to meet the five percent (5%)
organic matter specification.
(D) Shredded rubber, pine needles and shredded western red cedar are prohibited within five
(5) feet of any structure and discouraged from being used within Zone 1 defensible space
as mulch due to their higher level of combustibility.
Attachment B, 18
Attachment C, 18
7.28.090 - Design standards.
(4) Roofs:
(i) Pitched roofs, particularly those located over building entrances, shall be oriented such that
excessive snow and ice does not accumulate over or drop onto pedestrian walkways,
parking areas or drives. Special protection, such as snow fences, shall be required for roofs
so oriented.
(ii) Overhangs are required on pitched roofs and shall extend at least one and one-half (1.5)
feet from the point where the wall meets the roof as horizontally measured from the exterior
wall of the structure.
(iii) Roofing materials shall be suitable for local environmental conditions. Colors shall be
natural or earth tones.
(5) Weather Protection for Pedestrian Areas:
(i) Building Design:
(A) Buildings shall be designed so that entries, steps, balconies and pedestrian walkways or
sidewalks are protected from precipitation shedding off roofs.
(B) Sheltering roofs or building projections for protection from rain, wind, snow and ice shall
be provided in areas of pedestrian activity around public/ institutional, commercial and
mixed-use buildings, including sheltered entranceways at major entrances and pedestrian-
oriented façades along public sidewalks or walkways.
(C) Buildings shall avoid roof designs, canopy structures or other design features that would
allow accumulated snow, ice or rain or to fall or slide onto sidewalks or walkways. Roofs
shall be designed to protect doorways, exterior stairs, balconies, garage entrances, bicycle
parking and pedestrian sidewalks and walkways from snow and ice. Where sloping rooflines
incline toward such areas, protective features, such as arcades, loggias and dormers, shall
be used to protect pedestrians from falling snow. Such devices need not be continuous if
foundation planning beds are located to set the walkway away from the building facades.
(D) Additional roof design requirements are located in Section 7.28.090, Design Standards.
(ii) Sidewalk Design:
(A) Pedestrian walkways shall be clearly defined through the use of consistent pavers and
signage.
(B) Pedestrian walkways shall be designed to minimize potential conflicts with snow
management operations and ensure pedestrian safety by:
(1) Limiting grade changes where possible; and
(2) Using ramps instead of stairs where a change in grade is necessary.
(d) Generally Applicable Residential Design Standards:
(1) Applicability. The standards in this Section are applicable to the development of any residential
development pursuant to Section 7.28.010, Purpose and Applicability.
(2) Building Separation. The minimum separation between residential buildings, including accessory
buildings, is fifteen (15) feet. Architectural projections, such as decks, bay windows and roof
overhangs, may project into the separation area, but may not encroach into required setbacks.
Attachment B, 19
Attachment C, 19
(3) Roofs:
(i) All residential buildings shall have pitched roofs as follows:
Minimum
Pitch
Maximum
Pitch
Main Building Form 3:12 [1] 12:12
Secondary Building Form 3:12 [2] N/A
Metal 3:12 N/A
with a rise of not less than four (4) inches in twelve (12) inches of distance. Primary roofs shall
have a four-to-twelve (4:12) minimum and a twelve-to-twelve (12:12) maximum. Secondary
roofs shall have a four-to-twelve (4:12) minimum and metal roofs shall have a three-to-twelve
(3:12) minimum.
[1] Main building form roof pitches under 4:12 are required to be three (3) feet lower than the zone
district’s maximum height. Flat roofs are allowed if consistent with the architectural style of
the building.
[2] Flat roofs may be are permitted as secondary building form roofs or if it the flat roof is consistent
with the architectural style of the building.
(ii) All buildings shall incorporate roofline modulation.
(iii) Large expanses of bright, reflective materials are not permitted; however, standing seam
metal, copper or weathering steel (corten) may be acceptable.
Attachment B, 20
Attachment C, 20
7.32.040 - Paved trail design.
(a) Purpose. The purpose of this Section is to provide for the planning, layout, construction and
maintenance of recreational trails to provide for a safe and efficient network of regional and local trails
for the enjoyment of Avon's residents and visitors.
(b) Applicability. The following standards shall apply to any trails or paths required by the Town through
the development approval process. For standards not specifically listed here, the design, layout and
construction details in the Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan, Avon Comprehensive Transportation
Plan or Eagle Valley Regional Trails Plan shall apply. These standards are not inflexible and may be
modified through the Alternate Equivalent Compliance process in Section 7.16.120, Alternative
Equivalent Compliance, if different design or materials can be shown to provide better performance
and or environmental sensitivity.
Attachment C
PZC Recommendations: #CTA19001 Page 1 of 2
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECCOMENDATION TO TOWN COUNCIL
DATE OF DECISION: February 19, 2019
TYPE OF APPLICATION: Code Text Amendments
PROPERTY LOCATION: Town of Avon
FILE NUMBER: #CTA19001
APPLICANT: Town of Avon
These recommendations are made in accordance with the Avon Development Code
(“Development Code”) §7.16.040(c):
DECISION: Recommendation to approve the Title 7: Development Code Text Amendments.
FINDINGS:
1. The application is complete;
2. The application provides sufficient information to allow the reviewing authority to
determine that the development application complies with the relevant review
criteria;
3. The text amendments were reviewed with the criteria listed in Avon Municipal Code
Section 7.16.040(c), Review Criteria, and are found to be in substantial compliance as
outlined in the staff report for the February 5 and 19, 2019 public hearings;
4. The text amendments promote the health, safety, and general welfare of the Avon
Community;
5. The text amendments promote and implement the goals and policies of the Avon
Comprehensive Plan;
6. The text amendments implement the Avon Community Housing Plan by providing
inclusionary housing requirements for new development;
7. The text amendments promote and implement the purposes stated in the
Development Code, including Section 7.04.030 (n), by achieving a diverse range of
attainable housing types and price points to serve a diverse and stable full-time
residential community;
8. The Lot C, Avon Center at Beaver Creek property provided twenty (20) perpetually
deed-restricted dwelling units on the at the initial stage of development, as required
by the original PUD, before a rezoning to Town Center took place and should be
recognized and offset in the ordinance; and
9. The text amendments are necessary and desirable to respond to changed conditions
and new planning concepts.
CONDITION:
1. The Ordinance presented to Council will acknowledge that the Lot C development has
satisfactorily addressed community housing requirements with current development
and up to the threshold established by the Ordinance for new development.
Attachment C
PZC Recommendations: #CTA19001 Page 2 of 2
THESE FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECORD OF DECISION ARE HEREBY APPROVED:
BY:______________________________________ DATE: ___________________
PZC Chairperson