PZC Minutes 091702 (3)Minutes of Planning & Zoning Commission
September 17, 2002
Council Chambers
Town of Avon Municipal Building
400 Benchmark Road
I. Call to Order
The meeting was called to order at 6:00 PM.
II. Roll Call
All Commissioners were present with the exception of Commissioner Him.
III. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda
No additions to the amendment, however, staff did make note that today at noon, the following
Commissioners attended the color mockup review for Chapel Square (Item A: Under VI):
Commissioner Smith, Macik, Wolfe, and McClinton. There was some discussion at our site tour
regarding the color of the projected walls on Building C, the color of the cinder block protruding
on top of the existing retail building, the cornice color as proposed, and the painting of all
mechanical vents and stairwells along the back of the buildings.
IV. Conflicts of Interest
There were no conflicts of interest to disclose.
V. Consent Agenda
The Meeting Minutes from the September 3, 2002 Planning & Zoning Commission were
approved unanimously. Chairman Karow moved, Chairman Smith seconded. Motion carried 5
to 2, with Chairman Wolfe abstained from approval of the minutes.
VI. Conditions of Final Design
A. Chapel Square Modifications to Final Design
Proposed colors
Applicant: Timberline Management
Staff made a brief presentation of the application. The applicant, Dominic Mauriello of Braun
Associates and Greg Gastineau of Timberline Management, made a brief summary of the colors
proposed and asked if there were any questions. Commissioner Wolfe asked for clarification of
the fascia, soffit, and bands below the railing. The applicant said that those will be treated as
the trim, remaining green. Clarification for Building A and C. Those areas that protrude will be
light brown. On the retail building, the block courses will be light tan. The applicant confirmed
this for the Commission. Commissioner Wolfe asked about the green cornice, and said that it
would not compliment the proposed new colors. Commissioner Macik, Smith, and McClinton
agreed with Commissioner Wolfe's comments. Commissioner McClinton asked for clarification
about the recessed areas around the windows. Dominic Mauriello asked about the questions,
and pointed out that the lightness of the cornice if left as is will disappear. The applicant prefers
the green cornice. Also, Dominic said that they would not want to paint any of the freestanding
units but will paint the vents attached to the building. Railings and doorways would remain
green, anything affixed to building would be painted brown to match the new base color.
Elevated equipment that is attached to the building, such as that behind Masato's and Outback
should be painted brown. Greg Gastineau said that the costs were prohibitive to paint to match
the base brown on the mechanical equipment.
Commissioner Wolfe moved that the painting and color scheme for Chapel Square is approved
per the September 17, 2002 letter from Dominic Mauriello with the following clarifications:
1/ Fascias, soffits, and railings will be green.
2/ Areas referred to as recessed shall be the projected areas.
3/ On the back of the buildings, railings may remain green, but any mechanical equipment
mounted or attached to the building be repainted brown to match the base.
4/Cornices will remain as they are and not repainted to match light tan. This includes Wal-Mart.
Commissioner Smith seconds. Vote passes, with Commissioners Evans and Karow abstaining.
B. Lot C, Phase 1 B, Block 2, ACBC Subdivision
Final Design Details
Staff made a brief presentation of the details submitted for approval. The Commissioners
deliberated on the proposed details, saying that the metal is out of place on the building with the
wood. Commissioner Macik likes the metal. Commissioner Karow said the detail meets all
criteria for approval. Commissioner Wolfe did not feel that the detail was consistent with the
building, saying that it did not appear to correlate to anything on the building. Commissioner
Evans said the detail meets the criteria, but that the detail was not sufficient. Commissioner
Karow moves to approve. Commissioner Macik seconds. The motion fails, 4 to 2 with
Commissioner Smith, McClinton, Evans, and Wolfe voting against.
Commissioner Wolfe made a motion to reject detail SKA-123, on the basis that the design
shown is inconsistent with the rest of the building details. Commissioner McClinton seconds.
The motion carries 4 to 2, with Commissioner Karow and Macik voting against the motion.
VII. Sketch Design Plans
A. Lot 10B, Block 2 Wildridge
Single Family Home
Applicant: Mike Dantas
The applicant was not present. The Commission recommended breaking up the elevations with
a bellyband. Commissioner Wolfe said that several elevations would benefit from materials,
particularly the west and north elevations. Commissioner Karow is fine with the approval as
recommended. Commissioner Macik said that the dormers were a little out of scale and
supports breaking up the elevations. Commissioner Smith agrees with staff comments and
would like the height issue clarified. Commissioner McClinton agreed. Chairman Evans agreed
with the recommendations and the Commissioner comments, and asked that the landscaping
plan be revised since it is inadequate as proposed.
Commissioner Karow moved to approve with staff conditions. Commissioner Macik seconded.
The motion ties 3 to 3, with Commissioners Karow, Macik, and McClinton voting for and
Commissioners Smith, Evans, and Wolfe voting against. The motion dies.
Commissioner Smith made another motion for approval including all of staff recommended
motions and adding:
Minutes of P&Z Meeting
September 17, 2002
Page 2
1/ Building height be clarified; and
2/ The elevations be broken up on north and west elevations.
The motion passes 4 to 2, with Commissioners Evans and McClinton opposed.
B. Lot 52, Block 1, Wildridge
Duplex Residence
Applicant: Scharpf Construction
Staff made a brief presentation. The applicant, Tony Scharpf, asked if there were any
questions. Commissioner McClinton asked if the band running across the South and East
elevations was stucco and the applicant agreed. Commissioner Smith, Macik, Karow, and
Wolfe agreed with the staff recommendation. Commissioner Evans agreed. Commissioner
Karow moved to approve the plans with conditions as recommended. Commissioner Smith
seconded. Motion passed unanimously.
VIII. Other Business
A. Lot 49, Block 4, Wildridge
Deck & Room Addition
B. Lot 37, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Nawojazyk Duplex
Modified entry foyer, driveway widening
C. Revocation of Compliance Deposit in Design Guidelines
Ruth Borne explained that the Compliance Deposit is to be officially removed at the next Council
meeting. Commissioner Wolfe asked about the rationale behind the removal of the deposit, and
reminded the Commission that Council said that they would enhance Community
Development's ability to enforce issues. Chairman Evans encouraged the Commissioners to
attend the Council meeting with their thoughts on the matter.
IX. ADJOURN
Commissioner Smith made a motion to adjourn and the motion was approved unanimously.
The meeting was adjourned at 6:50 PM.
Respectfully submitted,
Tambi Katieb, AICP
Acting Recording Secretary
APPROVED: '\
Chris Evans
Chairman
Michael McClinton '
Secretary
Minutes of P&Z Meeting
September 17, 2002
Page 3