Loading...
PZC Packet 081500Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission Site Tour August 15, 2000 12:00 PM Council Chambers Town of Avon Municipal Building 400 Benchmark Road I. Site Tour Site visit of projects considered for review at the August 15, 2000 Regular Meeting Meet in front of the Municipal Building. Lunch is available to Commissioners who RSVP by 10:30 AM, Monday. Posted on August 11, 2000 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: • Avon Municipal Building, main lobby • Avon Recreation Center, main lobby • Avon / Beaver Creek Transportation Center • City Market, main lobby • On the Internet at http: / /www.avon.org Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission Work Session August 15, 2000 5:30 PM Council Chambers Town of Avon Municipal Building 400 Benchmark Road Agenda I. Discussion of regular meeting agenda items. Posted on August 11, 2000 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: • Avon Municipal Building, main lobby • Avon Recreation Center, main lobby • Avon / Beaver Creek Transportation Center • City Market, main lobby • On the Internet at http: / /www.avon.org Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission Regular Meeting August 15, 2000 6:00 PM Council Chambers Town of Avon Municipal Building 400 Benchmark Road Agenda I. Call to Order II. Roll Call III. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda IV. Conflicts of Interest V. Consent Agenda A. Approval of the July 18, 2000 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes [Tab 1 ] Posted on August 11, 2000 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: • Avon Municipal Building, main lobby • Avon Recreation Center, main lobby • Avon / Beaver Creek Transportation Center • City Market, main lobby • On the Internet at http: / /www.avon.org VI. Public Hearings Lot 12, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision [Tab 2] Project Type: PUD Amendment Address: 5712 E. Wildridge Road VII. Fence Applications Lot 46A, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision [Tab 3] Project Type: Split Rail Fence Address: 2410 Saddleridge Loop Owner: Gil Fancher VIII. Other Business A. Village at Avon Design Guidelines [Tab 41 Parcels K and L B. Staff Approvals: 1. Lot 2, Avon Town Square 90 Benchmark Road Adding of exterior vestibule to first floor corner entrance (Wells Fargo Building) 2. Lot 41, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision 2121 Longspur Road Stucco color change IX. Adjourn Posted on August 11, 2000 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: • Avon Municipal Building, main lobby • Avon Recreation Center, main lobby • Avon / Beaver Creek Transportation Center • City Market, main lobby • On the Internet at http: / /www.avon.org Town of Avon PUD Staff Report August 15, 2000 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date August 1, 2000 Project type Amended Planned Unit Development (PUD) Legal description Lot 12, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision Current Zoning Single Family (PUD) Address 5712 Wildridge Road East Introduction According to the Final Subdivision Plat, Replat Number 2 of Wildridge, Town of Avon, Lot 12, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision has development rights for a single family residence. The Town of Avon is modifying the PUD to increase the development rights on the site for a duplex residence on the site. This issue is brought before you because incorrect development information on Lot 12, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision was provided to the owner. Staff erroneously informed the owner that the property had development rights for a duplex residence. The owner apparently relied upon this information in purchasing the property. A few weeks ago, the owner was informed that this property was indeed a single family lot and a duplex was not permitted under the Wildridge PUD. Based upon discussions with the Town Attorney, the Town has filed an application for a PUD Amendment to increase the amount of development rights on the property to a duplex. Attached, please find a memo prepared by Burt Levin, Town Attorney, outlining the legal theory supporting this matter. The criteria for amending the PUD are set forth below and provide an adequate basis for approving the PUD amendment for this property. PUD Review Criteria 1. Conformance with the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan's Goals and Objectives. Goal Al: Ensure a balanced system of land uses that maintains and enhances Avon's identity as a residential community and as a regional commercial, tourism and entertainment center. Goal H1: Establish and maintain a high quality visual image of the Town. This proposal is consistent with the goal and policies of the Town by supporting a range of residential uses. 2. Conformity and compliance with the overall design theme of the town, the sub -area design recommendations and design guidelines of the Town. The project is surrounded by duplex properties. Lot 12, Block 4, is almost an acre in size. The site abuts Tract J, which is Town owned designated open space and then extends onto Forest Service property. The project will have to conform to all of the design criteria established by the Town through the final design review process. 3. Design compatibility with the immediate environment, neighborhood, and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, character, and orientation. Town of Avon Community Development \ \finance \cd - public \p &z \staff reports\2000 \081500 \I12b4pudreport.doc (970) 748 -4030 Fax (970) 949 -5749 Planned Unit Development Amendment Lot 12, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision August 15, 2000 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Page 2 of 3 The property was granted Final Design review in 1998 for a single family home. Staff erroneously identified this property as a duplex lot in the Staff Report. All of the design factors suggest that a duplex design is compatible with the environment, neighborhood and the adjacent properties. Most of the adjacent lots are duplex or triplex lots. There are only nine (9) single family lots in Wildridge. Five (5) of the single - family lots are in Block 1 located on Beaver Creek Point. 4. Identification and mitigation or avoidance of natural and /or geologic hazards that affect the property upon which the PUD is proposed. There are no known natural or geologic hazards on this site. 5. A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing on and off site traffic circulation that is compatible with the town transportation plan. One access point from Wildridge Road for this property will accommodate the traffic and circulation constraints for this site compatible with Town requirements. 6. Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to optimize and preserve natural features, recreation, views and function. A duplex on this property will not have a significant impact on the views from surrounding properties nor will it effect adjacent Town owned open space (Tract J) and the existing easement for the Town water storage facilities. 7. Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, functional, and efficient relationship throughout the development of the PUD. The phasing plan shall clearly demonstrate that each phase can be workable, functional and efficient without relying upon completion of future project phases. 8. Adequacy of public services such as sewer, water, schools, transportation systems, roads, parks, and police and fire protection. Public services are adequate to accommodate the addition of one dwelling unit. 9. That the existing streets and roads are suitable and adequate to carry anticipated traffic within the proposed PUD and in the vicinity of the proposed PUD. Traffic will not be adversely impacted by the addition of one dwelling unit. 10. Development Standards Other that the change from a single family to a duplex residence, this amendment will not affect the Wildridge PUD development standards now in effect for this property. Recommended Motion I move to approve the Planning & Zoning Resolution 00 -6, recommending approval of the application for amendment to the Wildridge PUD to establish Lot 12, Block 4 as a duplex lot. If you have any questions regarding this project or anything in this report, please call me at 748 -4009 or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, Ruth O. Borne, Assistan6irector Community Development Town of Avon Community Development 970) 748 -4030 Fax (970) 949 -5749 Memo To: Planning & Zoning Commission From: Burt Levin, Town Attorney Date July 24, 2000 Re: Resolution No. 00,6 PUD Amendment for Lot 12, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision (from a single - family lot to a duplex lot) Summary: The owner of the property known as Lot 12, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, purchased the property in 1999. Prior to her purchase of the property, staff in the Community Development Department provided the owner with land use information via fax, which erroneously indicated the property was zoned duplex. The owner reasonably relied upon this information in purchasing the property. Recently, the owner contacted Community Development staff and was informed that the property is in fact zoned as a single - family lot. The owner presented to Community Development the fax she had received from the Town erroneously advising her that her property was zoned as a duplex lot. The owner now requests that the Wildridge PUD be amended to show, consistent with the information coming from the Town which she relied upon, that the property is zoned as a duplex lot. The property in question is surrounded by duplex lots, abuts Forest Service property, and is almost an acre in size. The property is appropriate for a duplex. The case law in Colorado as it applies to this situation is clear. The doctrine of equitable estoppel is founded upon principles of fair dealing and is designed to aid the law in the administration of justice in cases where without its aid, manifest injustice would result. City & County of Denver v. Stackhouse, 135 Colo. 289, 310 P.2d 296 (1957). In proper cases, it is applicable to governmental entities. Colorado Water Quality Control F:cou nciVmemos /2000/112 b4wr Commission v. Town of Frederick, 641 P.2d 958 (Colo.1982). In order for the doctrine of equitable estoppel to be invoked, it must be established that the party to be estopped knew the relevant facts and that it intended its conduct or representations to be the basis of action by the party seeking the estoppel, or at least that he acted in such a way that the party seeking estoppel had a right to believe it was so intended. In addition, the party asserting the doctrine must have been ignorant of the true facts and must have changed its position in reliance on the conduct or representations, to his injury. Chamberlain v. Poe, 127 Colo. 215, 256 P.2d 229 (1953). An actual intent to mislead or defraud is not essential to the creation of an equitable estoppel. Piz v. Housing Authority, 132 Colo. 457, 289 P.2d 905 (1955). The critical element is reliance. See Cline v. City of Boulder, 168 Colo. 112, 450 P.2d 335 (1969). CORPORATION OF the PRESIDING BISHOP OF the CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, 689 P.2d 738 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1984) In this case, the owner of Lot 12, Block 4, Wildridge, purchased the property based at least in part upon incorrect information supplied by the Town that the property allowed a duplex. The owner contends that she would not have purchased the property had she been informed by the Town that that the property as currently zoned is limited to a single family residence. Under these circumstances the Town could well be estopped from prohibiting the owner to build a duplex (or sell her lot as a duplex lot). As such, the Wildridge PUD should be amended. Recommendation: I recommend that the Planning & Zoning Commission recommend to the Town Council approval of the PUD Amendment for Lot 12, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision. • Page 2 TOWN OF AVON PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 00-6 SERIES OF 2000 A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING TO THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF AVON APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE WILDRIDGE PUD FOR LOT 12, BLOCK 4, WILDRIDGE SUBDIVISION, TOWN OF AVON, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO WHEREAS, Alice Leeds has applied for an amendment to the Wildridge PUD to convert Lot 12, Block 4 from a single family lot to a duplex lot. WHEREAS, after notices required by law, a public hearing on said application was held by the Planning & Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon. WHEREAS, said application is consistent with all legal requirements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends to the Town Council of the Town of Avon approval of the application for amendment to the Wildridge PUD to establish Lot 12, Block 4 as a duplex lot. ADOPTED THIS 15th DAYOFAUGUST, 2000 Signed: Date: Chris Evans, Chair Attest: Date: Andrew Karow, Secretary JOHN & GREER GARDNER 5723 Wildridge Road East Avon, Colorado 81620 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 3426 Vail, Colorado 81658 August 4, 2000 Avon Planning & Zoning Commission PO Box 975 Avon, Colorado 81620 Attn: Recording Secretary Re: Lot 12, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision With respect to the Avon Community Development Department's application for duplex development of the above - referenced property, we wish to express our stroag okiections to such development. Our residence is directly across Wildridge Road from the subject lot and is a single family structure, even though our lot (Lot 82, Block 4) was designated for a duplex and is large enough (13 acres) to easily accommodate such development. The downgrade of zoning to duplex residential for Lot 12, Block 4, would not be consistent with other development from our property to the west, on both sides of Wildridge Road. Duplex development would also severely decrease our property value. Looking at how Wildridge has been developed, we think it should be obvious that some duplex designs are not very successful for their lots. As Wildridge is built out, it is our hope that many of the duplex lots, like ours, will be developed as single family. Certainly, from a Community Development perspective, duplex development should not be officially encouraged by the Town, and downgrading of zoning should not be permitted. Sincerely, John M. Gardner Greer S. Gardner August 4, 2000 Town of Avon Planning and Zoning Commission's Recording Secretary P.O. Box 975 Dear P &Z Commissioners, We are writing to oppose the amendment to the Wildridge PUD concerning Lot 12, Block 4. We believe the property should remain a single - family lot for the following reasons: • There is already a mix of single family and duplex lots. In this case we believe the topography and current density argues best for a single family as currently designated. • Crowding duplexes onto more lots creates twice the vehicle traffic and human congestion distracting from the potential ambiance and character of Wildridge. • While we understand there are improvements scheduled for Nottingham Road, there are presently none for Metcalf Road or Wildridge Road. Consider infrastructure improvements first! Set a precedent for the region. • There are no plans to separate Metcalf commercial traffic from Wildridge residential traffic; it is already congested at times and Wildridge is only 60% built out. • Property values are affected when density increases; the area becomes less attractive to potential buyers and existing residents. • With the remaining supply of lots in Wildridge we believe the efforts of the P &Z should be to enhance the subdivision, not increase its already high density. You should consider the desires of existing residents who have invested in the future of Avon. • If the Town of Avon changes zoning on a residential property a precedent is set for individuals who want to change zoning, something not always in the best interest of Avon or existing property owners. As residents we depend upon the P &Z to make thoughtful and strategic decisions regarding architectural standards and requests for changes in density. Please make your decisions based upon the long -term vision of Avon and the needs of current residents. Consider quality enhancements when considering requests for change, not how to place more duplexes in a subdivision with limited access. Look for ways to decrease density, widen roads, encourage tree and vegetation planting, and increase open space. Thank you for your consideration. af:7aeorgan 5735 Wildridge Road East H) 949 -4436 Town of Avon Final D o rt Staff Re p AUGUST 15, 2000 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date Project type Legal description Zoning Address Introduction August 15, 2000 Revised Fence Application Lot 46A, Block 1, Wildridge Single Family — PUD 2410 Saddleridge Loop On July 18, 2000 the Planning & Zoning Commission denied the original application for a fence on this property. On July 19, 2000 the applicant, E. Gil Fancher, revised the application and submitted it for approval under this new application. Since this was the only outstanding application item for the August 151 meeting, Staff accommodated the applicant's request to expedite the process and provided the application for vote via fax to the Planning & Zoning Commission. Staff recommended approval at that time, based on what representations were made by the applicant in the modified application. Planning and Zoning members voted to approve this application via fax, rather than hold a formal meeting. Subsequent to this fax voting, it is necessary to ratify the motion at this meeting. A consensus for approving the revised fence application was reached by a majority of the Commissioners with the condition that no chicken wire or other fencing be installed on the lower portion (kick space) of the fence to prevent the possible migration of small wildlife consistent with the Division of Wildlife's recommendations. This applicant was informed of this unratified vote and it's proposed condition by Staff. At the writing of this Staff report, a five (5) split rail fence was being constructed by the applicant in the modified area informally approved by the Planning and Zoning Commissioners. Design Review Considerations According to the Commission's Procedures, Rules & Regulations, Section 4. 10, the Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of this project: 1. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other provisions of the Zoning Code. • Allowed use: Staff believes that this fence conforms with the allowed residential use in this instance. Town of Avon Community Development \ \finance \cd - public \p &z \staff reports\2000 \081500 \lot 46a- fence.doclot9bl3.doc (970) 748 -4030 Fax (970) 949 -5749 Lot 46A, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision, Revised Fence Application August 15, 2000, Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting • Lot Coverage: The fence will enclose a portion of the south and west side of the property (as indicated on the attached diagram). The fence also duplicates some of the existing fencing already on the property. • Setbacks: There is no conlflict with allowing a split rail fence in the setback. The existing fences on the property all have a portion of fencing in the setback, to delineate the property lines. • Building Height: The applicant's request should be consistent with the Division of Wildlife's standard subdivision recommendations that fences should not exceed 48" in height, and leave a space of 16" open in the lower half of the fence to allow for deer fawns and elk calves migration. • Landscaping: The fences will be visible from surrounding properties and increase the amount of split rail fences on the property. There are fences which delineate more than three properties in the immediate vicinity and are very visible. 2. The type and quality of materials of which the structure is to be constructed. A standard split rail fence is consistent with the Town's requirements for fencing materials. 3. The appearance of proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways, with respect to architectural style, massing, height, orientation to street, quality of materials, and colors. The appearance of the existing split rail fences combined with the new application will create numerous fences which appear to have no beginning or ending and duplicate one another. However, this revised fence application will be more compact and acceptable since it delineates only a singular area adjacent to and behind the home. 4. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired. The fence request duplicates existing fences in the neighborhood. This application is for a small area and in Staff's opinion, is of no significant impact to aesthetic values. 5. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. Not applicable. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the fence application with the following condition(s): The location and design of this fence shall be as defined in the letter dated July 19, 2000 to Ruth O. Borne, including the attached revised site plan, as submitted in the application. Town of Avon Community Development \ \finance \cd - public \p &z \staff repo rts\2000 \081500 \lot 46a- fence.doc (970) 748 -4030 Fax (970) 949 -5749 Lot 46A, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision, Revised Fence Application August 15, 2000, Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Recommended Motion Staff recommends approval of the fence application with the following condition(s): 1. The location and design of this fence shall be as defined in the letter dated July 19, 2000 to Ruth O. Borne, including the attached revised site plan, as submitted in the application. If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please don't hesitate to call me at 748 -4002, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, 14107 Assistant Director Community Development Town of Avon Community Development \ \finance \cd - public \p &z \staff repo rts\2000 \081500 \lot 46a- fence.doc (970) 748 -4030 Fax(970)949 -5749 Fancher 2410 Saddle Ridge Loop • P.O. Box 1141 • Avon, CO 81620 • (970) 949 -0610 August 8, 2000 Town of Avon Community Development Town of Avon Planning & Zoning RE: Split Rail Fence for 2410 Saddle Ridge Loop To Whom It May Concern: Attached please find a letter to Ruth Borne with a revised submittal for the split rail fence for 2410 Saddle Ridge Loop in Wildridge, submitted July 19, 2000. Please keep in mind that we originally submitted for this fence the first week in May and for whatever reason were not acknowledged until the July meeting. On July 20 Ruth Borne left a message on our voice mail saying she did not see a problem with our fence. We saw this as a go ahead and began working on our fence the following Monday, July 24. That afternoon we had a call telling us that our fence was not approved so we halted our fence "construction" immediately. Last Wednesday, August 2, we had a message from Tambi Katieb saying "Planning and Zoning did make a vote on your split rail fence, the modified application that you submitted to Ruth on July 19, on the condition that no chicken wire is used to close the fence off for wildlife reasons." This was a message saying there had been a vote and that we were approved so we continued "construction" of our fence. Today, August 8, we received a call from Tambi saying that one of the P and Z members had been out of town and that our fence "construction" should be halted again. A quorum is a quorum and approval is approval and should not be taken back once given. We are sorry that one member did not get his /her vote but we feel, from the amount of time it has taken to the approval then disapproval, as though we are getting pulled in many directions. Our fence is a very attractive split rail fence, photo attached. It has five rails as we were never keen on chicken wire to begin with nor did we ever mention chicken wire in our application. We were not aware that we had to specify the number of rails in the split rail fence and apologize for not doing so. The purpose of our fence is, as stated in our application, to contain our dogs and to keep other dogs out of our yard to maintain some privacy for our family. Wildridge has a dog problem. We take the same walk every night and every night we are chased by the same barking dog around the corner. There is no doubt that, when given the chance, this same dog loves to chase wildlife as well. Roaming dogs are more of a threat to wildlife than those contained within a fenced area. We realize the desire to help the wildlife, but deer will be more than able to clear our fence and smaller animals can clear the bottom and through the rails. We do live in a residential community and the would -be fenced area of our yard is small. The fence we are actually talking about is only two sides as the other two have been in place for many years. We are taking a step of responsibility in an effort to contain our dogs and give them some space without invading the space of our neighbors. We checked with our neighbors before submitting with the town to make sure that a fence was not offensive to them. We were told by Avon's Community Development to get an invisible fence and yet the shock collar system, while effective with many dogs, is 100% ineffective with one of ours. We would really like to be able to complete our fence. It is an odd position to be in to ask permission to do something to our own property, and we ask that you please consider where we are coming from. We are more than happy to keep the gates to our fence open when our family and/or our dogs are not in the yard, to appease any wildlife concerns. We applied for our fence before the rules on fencing were changed and we are surrounded by neighbors who have fencing to contain their dogs and protect their children. Our desire is to have a space for our dogs and to protect our family and our dogs from roaming neighborhood dogs. We think a little privacy is not too much to ask for and we would greatly appreciate final and formal approval from the Planning and Zoning Board. S01cerely % �enme Fancher E. Gil Fancher R Aug -10 -2000 17:12 From-TOWN OF AVON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 9709495749 T-066 P.005/006 F -176 Fancher 2410 Saddle Ridge Loop • P.O. Box 1141 - Avon, CO 81620 • (970) 949 -0610 July 19, 2000 Ruth O. Borne Town of Avon Community Development RE. Split Rail Fence for 2410 Saddle Ridge Loop Ms. Borne: Attached please find a revised submittal for the split rail fence that we desire for our property at 2410 Saddle Ridge hoop in Wildridge. It is unfortunate that our changes were not included in the application, but this is the fence that we would like to have approved. It is our belief that this fence will conform with what surrounds us as the neighboring properties have the same fencing. Our desire for the fence is twofold. Firstly we wish to shield our newborn child from roaming dogs and secondly we wish to keep roaming dogs away from our dogs. We began this process over two months ago and anxiously await your reply. You may reach us at home, 949 -0610, or on our cell numbers listed below, n erely, e ancher 3 0 -8972 (cell) C - E. Gil Fancher 904 -2002 (cell) Aug -10 -2000 17:12 From -TOWN OF AVON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 9709495749 T -066 P.006 /006 F -176 ,��Gt r- �j ai .i-6Rn cvd r-4 f !'� C •= ,J l •,itlC .4 Rv Ila r� � F +` g z •`.. T. Cam! � � � H ' a .,jY■ Cr'j � .Rr� � r Qi �1 a '1 tti.r � .•v {yW� s S. 7 5. is // f ^ ^'�•,Ir�:tQ.1,.� -.f I.,fi'�s y ,•- Mii�� tQ �' b� ,r" � , %^� •tea y't. . "%. Y,�,% r '" ��;' i. t \\� ��� v [•� $. %� � � . e'' u �• c � t� K .�e�� w :f,..d� ��?'•8r t% yJ• e'�•• r'•"/!'�'^tom, ,c 7N \� �• � a �. v. 4 Z4 ia' K 0 \ • O N } a m ° �a^ � A b T l oS'GS� v L.00N ELI \ tat u �p�c•�.':':':: I. •::� 'I SO IL �. � 4 °� 6�. 4 � , '.`r q'c � Q . a •� � ice' Q el rr- 1'a r i r- 1 I t ,I �i � LII 4.1 u t� r� t� 092MAums gszi'M Z086 *zs pca xv3 ZS ; crx ou"VCJ7E0 �I Z0 'd 82IE91MD S 'OH XV3 ZS3 WE SiIG&O -MaNT I8 Nd J20 Q3M 00- 6I -'Ifl� r M he VALLEY C O L O R A D O August 8, 2000 Peter Jamar Peter Jamar Associates, Inc. PO Drawer 4727 Vail, CO 81658 RE: Village at Avon Design Guidelines Dear Peter: This letter is to follow up on our meeting of August 3'd, regarding the draft Design Review Guidelines for the Village at Avon (Planning Areas K and L). Following is a summary of our comments and recommendations. Since Planning Areas K and L are the target regional commercial areas and we anticipate large box retailers, we are suggesting that you couple the design standards along with the design guidelines into one document. In doing so, you will hopefully dictate the type of building that is integrated to local identity (allowing for creativity) yet still retaining the high visibility that corporate retailers demand. We have categorized our comments according to the sections which we understand Arthur Erickson's group will be detailing: Architectural Theme The architecture theme should be established to avoid the "big -box" design. All of the guidelines and standards should be drafted to accomplish a variety of scale within the context of the alpine environment. The appearance of several buildings making up one retail area, rather than one large rectangular building, may be accomplished through several design principles. One effective solution is to limit the use of similar building elevations. Facades may have a minimum standard of architectural treatment per linear feet. The aesthetic character requires clarification, especially with attention to animating features and facades for limited lengths when viewed from public rights of way. Wall plane projections and depths are not indicated. Uninterrupted lengths are not specified. All wall planes should require articulation and fenestration. This standard can be divided between retail stores based square footage (30,000 or less for instance), since massing will obviously affect the standards you should be applying to fagade and wall treatments. • Roof guidelines and standards are missing. Variation in rooflines, features and screening of rooftop equipment should be codified in this document. Treatment of Post Office Box 975 400 Benclunark Road parapet heights, eaves, slopes and roof planes should be explicit. Uninterrupted Avon, Colorado 81620rooflines should be prohibited. 970- 748 -4000 970- 949 -9139 Fax 970- 845 -7708 TTY The Village Design Guidelines Staff Comments, Page 2 August 8, 2000 Back and side facades and entryways are not addressed. High visibility of entrances, orientation of facades in relation to public ways and the character of such design features for these areas should have explicit standards and design principles. Architectural details should reflect the alpine environment and synthesize this environment with the warmth of a Western slope retail area. Materials and Colors • There are no specific standards on materials and colors used in building. Again, you can separate standards (i.e., no metallic, fluorescent/no prefab steel paneling) from guidelines (i.e., aesthetically pleasing /no apparent `back' of building /compatible with adjoining development) in one document. • The use of split face masonry and other urban/industrial materials should be minimized, if not prohibited all together. • Materials for retaining and decorative walls must be specified. • Indigenous colors found in the mountain environment should be established and published as a specific standard. Lighting Lighting standards and guidelines should be more specific to types of approved fixtures and integration with treatment. Light trespass affecting existing neighborhoods, as well as overall light pollution should be minimized. Streetscape and Adjacent Site Elements Guidelines such as scale, efficiency and distribution of surface parking areas should be mentioned here. Also, restrictions on off - street (lot) parking locations (i.e., front loading a superstore) should be specified as a standard. There should be pedestrian standards as they relate to these large commercial projects, since the desired result should be to interface these car - oriented developments with the local neighborhoods and existing pedestrian patterns. Pedestrian circulation should promote a safe and friendly atmosphere. Internal sidewalks (and the specifications of such), external sidewalks, walkways, shelters, and the distinguishing features of these areas from auto areas need clarification. Again, both guidelines and standards should speak to the integration of patios, courtyards and shopping areas as they relate to the principal buildings. Interior and exterior `cart' parking, typical to a regional department store, should have treatment specified as both standards and guidelines. Shared parking allowances should be standards to provide both accessibility and incentive to developments that share these spaces rather than creating completely separate parking areas for each commercial site. Along with architectural treatment of the building, streetscape elements will serve to define and enhance this gateway to the Village at Avon. Language should be crafted in the form of a guideline to this effect. The Village Design Guidelines Staff Comments, Page 3 August 8, 2000 Screening of Mechanical Equipment `Trash Dumpsters' and `Mechanical Screening' sections can be more specific in regards to colors and screening and their overall integration with landscaping and visibility. Loading docks are not addressed in any detail or form. Large docks should be completely enclosed and have the same treatment as the primary structure. Standards for general site condition and trash should be established. Signage Square footage on signage is not indicated in detail sufficient to restrict billboard style signage. Signage, including trademarks, should be limited to a maximum area. You may want to consider integrating into this document part or all of the Town of Avon standards for signage, materials and lighting. Miscellaneous Employee housing on -site should either be made a requirement or a serious design guideline consideration perhaps with the incentive of relaxing roofing standards in certain instances. National corporate retailers considering this project may not be aware of the acute employee shortages and the difficulty of providing adequate employee housing. City Market has successfully implemented such a program in Avon and throughout Colorado. John Caldwell, Director of Real Estate for City Market, has offered to provide information on their success in providing on -site employee housing at: (970) 244 -1074. Fire access standards and guidelines should be addressed. Noise ordinance is not apparent. • No provision for on -site recycling bins is apparent. Overall, it appears as though you have the basis of guidelines started though not with sufficient detail to lead into more stringent standards that are necessary to guarantee a desirable outcome in these core regional commercial areas. Both standards and guidelines can be developed to promote architectural and design solutions. However, we would ask that you keep in mind the strong marketing pressure and potentially detrimental aesthetics that could result as a consequence of regulations woven so loosely that corporate developments see no compelling reason to contribute to the community's sense of place. Feel free to call our department with any questions that you may have. Kind Regards, Tambi Katieb, AICP G cc: Mike Matzko, Community Development Director Larry Brooks, Assistant Town Manager William J. Post, Applicant Representative Memo To: Planning and Zoning Commissioners Thru: Mike Matzko, Community DevelopmentD'C4Y\,- From: Tambi Katieb, AICP Date August 15, 2000 Re: Design Review Guide for Parcels K and L, Village at Avon Summary As required by the Town's approval ordinance for the Village at Avon, and the Village at Avon PUD Guide Section 7(b), the Town received a copy of the proposed Design Review Guidelines for Parcels K and L for our review and subsequent approval. The PUD Guide allows us sixty (60) days for review and approval of this document. It was officially received by Staff on August 9, 2000. Also, this Design Guideline document (as submitted) meets the minimum requirement allowed by the PUD Guide. Recommendation: Staff recommends review and approval of the Design Review Guidelines for Parcels K and L as proposed. Since under the terms outlined in the PUD guide this is the required minimum for design review guidelines, Staff also recommends that Planning and Zoning comments on this document be forwarded and incorporated into these guidelines at their first substantial amendment by the applicant. It is our understanding that these basic guidelines will be amended as soon as the first regional retail store has applied for permits. Attachments: Letter from William J. Post (August 9, 2000) Design Review Guide- Planning Areas K and L FREDERICK S. OTTO WENDELL B. PORTERFIELD, JR. WILLIAM J. POST Mike Matzko TOWN OF AVON P.O. Box 975 Avon, Colorado 81620 Dear Mike: OT" 9 PORTERFIELD & POST LLc ATTORNEYS AT LAW POST OFFICE BOX 3149 VAIL, COLORADO 816W3149 August 9, 2000 PHYSICAL ADDRESS: 0051 EAGLE ROAD EMERALD ACRES BLDG. III EAGLE -VAIL, COLORADO 81620 TEL. (970) 949.5380 FAX (970) 845 -9135 Re: The Village (at Avon) Design Review Guide In accordance with Section 7(b) of the Supplemental Regulations contained within The Village (at Avon) PUD Guide, I hereby submit on behalf of Traer Creek LLC the revision of the Design Review Guide for Parcels K and L (originally submitted on July 28, 2000) to the Planning and Zoning Commission for its review and approval. Please place this matter on the agenda for action at the regular Planning and Zoning Commission meeting scheduled for August 15, 2000. Very truly yours, William J. Post WJP:lds enclosure wjp \Itrs \tofavon drb 1 Y THE VILLAGE (at Avon) Design Review Guide - Planning Areas K and L I. INTRODUCTION These design guidelines provide guidelines for the design of improvements within Parcels K and L of The Village (at Avon). A. Overall Design Theme The overall design theme for Parcels K and L of The Village (at Avon) is�: to establish an attractive appearance for visitors and residents and yet be flexible enough to allow for affordable design solutions. The Village (at Avon) will $e amending these guidelines to include more detailed supplementary architectural, site planning, landscape design guidelines prior to the issuance of building permits within Areas K and L. B. Purpose of the Guidelines The purpose of this document is to establish certain design guidelines for Planning Areas K and L of The Village (at Avon). These guidelines provide jqr the development of regional commercial and mixed uses in a manner consistent with the overall context of the Village at Avon and its surroundings. In addition to the Design Guidelines, there are several other documents that may affect the design and development of property within rhese Planning Areas. it!: is strongly recommended that developers, architects, and property owners review these documents prior to making any development/design decisions. These documents include, without limitation The Village (at Avon) PUD Guide, recorded covenants, and Town of Avon building codes. Contacting The Village (at Avon) Design Review Board (DRB) and the Town bf Avon Department of Community Development to review and discuss these and other pertinent documents is a prudent first step in the design/developme�nt process. The Village (ai Avon) TI. DESIGN REVIEW PROCEDURE W The design review requirements for The Village (at Avon) will follow timeframes and submittal requirements as described in The Village (at Avon) Design Review Board Guidelines, Rules and Procedures. In order to facilitate development approval, site plan and architectural review should occur as a coordinated process. The applicant should be aware of review timetables and should structure plan submissions so that sufficient time for plan modifications can: be scheduled. A. Pre - Application Conference Prior to the formal submittal of any request for approval to proceed with building site improvements, an informal pre - application conference shall be held between the applicant and the Design Review Board representative. This conference shall serve to acquaint the applicant with the Design Guidelines and to allow staff to become familiar with the applicant's development intent and design philosophy. A schematic site plan and building concept drawings will aid in discussion at this conference, however applicants are encouraged not to prepare detailed designs which might require extensive revision as a result of the pre- application conference. An applicant shall bring the following information in a brief summary: • General project concept • Specific uses proposed, and intensity of use proposed (floor area and parking demand) • Proposed construction timing • General concepts concerning building size and exterior materials, and general site plan concepts: An exterior materials package including roof material and color, wall treatment, glass and glazing. Site plan concepts including site organization, landscaping, irrigation, grading, lighting, and signs. Preliminary Plan Review Following the informal pre - application conference between the applicant and the Design Review Board representative an applicant may submit for Preliminary Review. The requirements shall be as follows: 1 Six copies of the Preliminary Plans which shall include; a. Site Plans b. Floor Plans The Village (at Avon) c C. ,Elevations d Roof Design e. Exterior Materials and Colors f Sketches of character of the proposed structure g- Landscape Plans h- Revegetation Plans if applicable i. Initial drainage and erosion control measures I Square footage breakdown for commercial, service, and residential areas. All site and landscape plans shall be a minimum of 1 "= 20' scale. 1/16'; 118'; or 1/4" = PO optional for floor and elevation plans. The DRB requires that plans be submitted at least 35 days prior to a meeting; oJ' the DRB for adequate review time. In accordance with the Village at Avon Annexation and Development Agreement during this review period a copy of the Preliminary Plans will be forwarded to the Town of Avon Planning and Zoning Commission for comment. If the Planning and Zoning Commission so desires, they may forward their comments to the DRB prior to the scheduled DRB meeting. G Preliminary Plan Action The DRB shall take one of the following actions; I. Approve the proposal and authorize n a Letter of Preliminary Approval subject to such conditions as it finds necessary; or 2. Continue the hearing for changes or additional information needed to resolve substantive design issues; or 3. Deny the proposal stating the specific reasons for denial. A copy of the Preliminary Plan findings will be transmitted to the Town of Avon Planning and Zoning Commission for informational purposes. D. Final Plan Review Following Preliminary Plan approval an applicant may submit for Final Plan Review. A Final Plan submittal must include the following information: 1. Final Plan Review Checklist and Review Fee. The Village (at Avon) 3 2. 3. One full set of all building elevations accurately rendered in the proposed colors. Six (6) sets of the following: a. Site Plan (dimensioned) at scale 1 "= 10'showing.• 1) Property boundaries of the subject property and adjacent t Property lines 20' outside of the subject property, 2) Setback lines: 3) Easements; 4) Existing and proposed contours at 2' intervals; S) Building footprint and eave drip line locations; 6) Driveways and curb cuts if any; 7) Site drainage; 8) Utilities including meter and exterior panel locations and evidence of adequate sewer service gradient; 9) Site improvements such as .sidewalks, steps, ADA access and egress routes, landscape materials, site furniture, premises boundaries, railings, fences, etc.; b. Architectural Plans at .scale 114" = 1'0" showing the following: 1) Dimensioned floor plans of the all proposed buildings; 2) Square footage of all floor plans including total buildings) footprint and impervious surfaces; 3) All building elevations with existing and f nal grade shown: 4) Longitudinal and cross building sections through all principal masses of the building. S) Building height calculation referenced to the surveyed elevation of the nearest property corner or other permanent witness point, calculated elevation of top of foundation concrete and calculated ridge, parapet or wall height elevation; 6) Exterior lighting plan and lamp wattage; The Village (at Avon) 4 7) Exterior materials sample board and colors and written specifications, 2 color photographs of sample board. C. Landscape planar scale 1,, = IO'showing: 1) Hard and soft surface treatments; 2) Plant materials with legend of numbers, sizes species and common name; 3) Street furniture including but not limited to tree grates and cages, planters, seating, tables, fences, walls, refuse containers, etc; and 4) Irrigation and maintenance plan. d Grading /Construction Management Plan at scale I" = 10' showing; 1) Erosion, dust and trash controls, trash dumpster, construction limitfencing and sanitary facilities: 2) Curb and sidewalk protection; 3) Site grading; 4) Materials staging areas; 5) Concrete truck washout basin; 6) Construction trailer location (if any); 7) Site access routes construction impact limit; 8) Worker Parking Plan; 9) Pedestrian and Vehicular Traffic Plan demonstrating uninterrupted pedestrian and vehicular traffic access and egress to and between adjacent properties throughout the construction period, • and 10) Construction sign (4'x 4' maximum) design and location. The construction sign must display the owner's name, street address, Building Permit Number, builder name with telephone number for routine and emergency contact. Additionally the sign may display up to two real estate brokers logos and telephone numbers. No other construction related signs are permitted (e.g. Subcontractors, suppliers, services, architect, bank etc.) The Village (at Avon) 5 e. , Other: I) Parking requirement and location. E Final Plan Action The DRB shall take one of the following actions: I. Approve the proposal and authorize a Letter of Final Approval subject to such conditions as it finds necessary; or 2. Continue the hearing for changes or additional information needed to resolve substantive design issues, or 3. Deny the proposal stating the specific reasons for denial F. Governing Authority and Regulations The Village (at Avon) Design Review Board is charged with the function of reviewing and acting upon the general design and appearance of any building, construction, paving, grading or landscaping proposed on any lot or parcel of land within The Village (at Avon). The Village (at Avon) Design Review Board will review any building, building alteration, landscaping, or signage proposed within The Village (at Avon). III. URBAN DESIGN Urban Design, as related to these guidelines, refers to all aspects of the development, excluding architecture, within the urbanized area of The Village (at Avon) south of interstate Highway 70. It includes the relationship of building to site and outdoor space, Parking areas and access, pedestrianways and sidewalks, landscaping, streetscapes and street furniture, sculpture, signs, fencing, and lighting. Generally all those elements that create the image of a Town and how they are combined are considered the Urban Design. A. General Design Considerations Surrounding the buildings and along the public ways, landscape plantings, walks, public lighting, site furnishings, and signage should create a year - round, coherent and festive atmosphere. It is the combination of the architectural and landscape styles that will create The Village (at Avon). Landscaping should be considered an integral part of the design of all projects. Individual properties should be designed to respect and enhance the design of streetscapes. The most appropriate shrubs and trees are those that are known to be hardy, and which have a natural appearance within Avon's mountain - valley location. The Village (at Avon) 6 B• Area Wide Guidelines Sitin Conditions: Buildings and other improvements should be individually designed for the situ on which they are to be placed. The site and its relationship to other structures, scenic values, views and climatic orientation should be the dominant factors in the design and siting of buildings. Pedestrian accessways should be incorporated into the site designs. Buildings and improvements should be designed and sited to conform to the terrain and to take advantage of views. Terraced buildings and parking will minimize site disturbance, provide less costly construction and provide Opportunities for privacy and views by grade separation. Passive solar design as a component of the architectural design of individual buildings is encouraged. The use of sun exposure - reducing elements such as overhangs, pergola's, canopies, eaves and awnings can be designed as integral components of the architectural design. Outdoor spaces such as courtyards and plazas can have southern exposure to extend the periods of seasonal use and comfort. However, within these spaces, there should be a variety of sun and shade conditions to allow full use during the extreme heat of summer months and take advantage of warm winter days. North facing entries and outdoor spaces should be carefully considered because of winter conditions. Complete vehicular circulation, including back up and turn around areas, if applicable must be provided. Permanent parking areas must be concrete, asphalt, or other hard surface with spaces clearly marked. Two handicapped stalls per each 100 stalls is recommended. Snow storage areas equaling 15% of all outdoor surface - parking areas are recommended. Driveway or maneuvering areas within a parking lot must be designed to provide for safe and reasonable maneuverability of vehicles. StnP.in�: All parking spaces within permanent paved parking areas must be striped in a manner clearly showing the layout of the intended stall. Maintenance: All parking areas must be maintained in a safe and sanitary condition and kept in good repair. Provisions should be made for the plowing of snow from all outdoor surface - parking areas. The village (at Avon) 7 Parkin& Area Landscape: Parking area interior landscape can be confined to islands. Trees, flowers , grasses and shrubs are recommended for these islands. Draima &e: The builder is responsible for preventing erosion of the site both during construction and after the project is complete. Runoff of silt, debris or sedimentation onto adjacent streets, gutters, sidewalks, rights -of -way, storm drain systems or adjacent properties should be avoided. The Town of Avon's stormwater and drainage manual should be reviewed and used as a guideline. Drainage into common open space areas is not allowed except in planned drainage channels or drainage easements. Drainage swales should not surface drain across major walkways or trail systems. Drainage can be piped or rock lined if flows are significant and/or if it flows into natural channels. Parking bays and walkways should not slope toward the building without adequate provisions for draining storm water away from the structure. All paved areas must be sloped to properly drain. Paved areas must be designed to carry surface water to the nearest practical street, storm drain or natural water course approved by the Design Review Board. Concentrated flows of water from parking areas should be collected in an appropriate manner. A detailed drainage study, if deemed appropriate, must be prepared by a Civil Engineer and submitted to the Design Review Board for approval. Planting All landscape development, including specific landscape elements such as planters, retaining walls, and berms must be approved by the Design Review Board. Plant material selection and placement must ensure safe sight lines to traffic and signs. Care should be taken that no hazards are created for pedestrians and vehicles by plant litter. Plants are to be installed and maintained according to sound horticultural practices. Plantings must be consistent in quality and character with an approved materials list by the DesignReview Board. The Village (at Avon) Shrub planting beds can be mulched to prevent erosion and help retain moisture. All planting beds can be contained on all sides by a hard edge (i.e. sidewalk, wood, or steel edging, ed building, or curb). Snow loading should be consider when locating shrub areas so as to avoid winter damage to plants. Shrubs should be a minimum size of five gallons. Hedges, in winter, become snow fences and must be placed accordingly, Trees: Trees must be planted to provide for tree growth without disruption of adjacent areas. Each tree or tree "clump" must be no smaller than two inches in caliper. Replacement, if necessary; and maintenance of each tree is the responsibility of the builder. bead trees must be replaced promptly with a tree of the same type, quality and size. Trees should be chosen and located to provide a function such as screening, shade, view enframement or accent. Accent plantings can occur at locations such as building entries, parcel entries or pedestrian areas. Care should be taken when selecting and locating trees so that Evergreen trees don't significantly shade streets in winter creating hazardous icing conditions; nor should they block south - facing windows limiting solar access. Mulches: Mulches can be utilized to treat the areas around tree and shrub plantings in all Zones. Rock mulch is discouraged adjacent to asphalt areas. Grasses: Grasses can be used in several situations, two of which are: In large open areas as a soil stabilizing agent and for visual effect (primarily viewed from vehicular traffic). Close to pedestrian areas where visual relief from extensive pavement is desired. In large open areas numerous grass mixes can be considered. Thought should be given to water requirements and availability, maintenance requirements, potential fire hazard of dry grass, and visual effect desired. In these areas, rough grass mixes could be utilized. Native grasses and wildflowers/bulbs require less water, less mowing and lend themselves well to the perimeter areas, and when utilized, should be selected to match adjacent native grasses. The Village (at Avon) 9 In more intensively developed areas with pedestrian traffic anticipated, bluegrass mixes can be utilized to provide a lush, green appearance. Bluegrass mixes require more water and mowing than rough or dryland grasses and should be used judiciously. Irrigation: Irrigation is required in all formal landscaped areas. The intent is to keep the plant material healthy in appearance by meeting plant water requirements for proper growth and development. The type of irrigation will be determined by the intensity of landscape development and the associated water requirements of the plant species. For example, parking lot islands that contain only river rock mulch and trees may receive a drip irrigation system whereas plazas that have bluegrass, as well as trees and shrubs will require more traditional irrigation systems. Suggested irrigation techniques depending on the intensity of landscape development include the following: • Automatic spray irrigation system • Manual spray irrigation system • Automatic trickle irrigation system • Quick coupler system Exterior Furnishings: Within the landscape, three - dimensional objects are the most readily perceived. Careful design and use of these elements in the public and semi - public areas is critical in order to convey permanence and identity, as well as theme. Furnishings should be provided as appropriate and establish character through a unified design vocabulary, and provide strong visual continuity while fulfilling functional requirements. Mechanical Screenin Ground- mounted equipment such as power transformers and air handling equipment must be screened from public view by either materials integral with the building, a fence or landscaping, all of which must be approved by the Design Review Board prior to construction. Utility boxes should be located away from buildings, toward parcel property lines or painted to match surroundings. In all cases, plant material must be used to screen these boxes. Fencing may be used in combination with plant materials. Phone pedestals, meters and transformers will, whenever possible, occur to the side and rear of buildings. Vacuum breakers (irrigation equipment) will be located below grade in inspection pit housings or adequately screened by landscaping. The Village (at Avon) 10 Trash Dumpsters: Trash dumpsters shall be properly screened on all sides and enclosed by a roof if located outside. Screenin and Fen cin : Service Area Screening - All service areas are to be properly screened from adjacent land uses. Lim The lighting systems will serve functional and aesthetic roles. These include: • To provide security and visual safety. • To serve as directional indicators for both vehicular and pedestrian traffic. • To provide extended outdoor use time, particularly in pedestrian gathering areas. • To reinforce the identity and character through form, color and materials of fixtures, visual light quality and placement. In all commercial /retail and office parcels, lighting plans must be approved by the Design Review Board. Pedestrian Scale Liahtin The use of low -level light sources at the pedestrian scale to accent or illuminate the ground plane provides a special opportunity to reinforce the unique identity and "sense of place" found in the area. This is achieved by a variety of lighting fixture types and lower mounting heights. At night, these design elements provide light for safety and aesthetic effect. By day, the physical shapes and sizes lend animation and scale to pedestrian spaces. Fixtures at a height of 16" can be utilized to illuminate pedestrian traffic areas. Additional pedestrian scale lights may be utilized, including smaller bollard light (42" height) and canister type lights on overhead structures. Handicapped considerations: Consideration for the handicapped should be a part of the design process for any project in accordance with appropriate ADA standards. The Village (at Avon) 11 1V. TECHNICAL DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS Grading and Drainage The following grades should be observed: • Ground shall slope away from all buildings at a minimum of six inches (6 ") in ten feet (10'). • All planted areas should drain at a minimum of two percent (2 %). Maximum slopes on planted areas should be 2:1 (grass 4:1). • All paved streets and driveways with curb and gutter should drain at a minimum of one -half percent 0 /2 %). • All walkways and other paving should drain at a minimum of one percent 0 %). Maximum ramp grade should be eight percent (8 %). Walkway slopes should be kept to a minimum to ensure pedestrian safety in the winter. • All parking bays should drain at a minimum of one -half percent (1/2 %). Maximum grade should be five percent (5 %), to ensure pedestrian safety on ice and snow. Landscaping (recommended plant materials) Deciduous Trees: • Ash • Hackberry • Aspen • Willow • Cottonwood Evergreen Trees: • Blue Spruce • Douglas Fir • Ponderosa Pine, .Limber Pine Deciduous Shrubs: • Buffaloberry • Snowberry • Common Lilac • Sumac • Mountain Mahogany • Willow • Potentilla Evergreen Shrubs: • Juniper • Yucca. Ground Covers/Flowers: • Artemesia • Perennials • Daylily • Wildflowers • Mahonia The Village (at Avon) 12 Grasses: • Blue Stem • Blue Drama • Buffalo Grass • Fescue Recommended Mulches: Signs: • Cobble: Four- to six -inch (4" - 6 ") average diameter, tan or Cobble should be infilled with one - quarter inch 1/4 "y in color. weak growth. )pea gravel to inhibit • Washed River Rock: One -half to three- quarter inch (1/2" -3/4 ") average diameter, smooth and tan or gray in color. Gravel should be installed a minimum of three inches (3 ") deep. • Wood chips, Pole Peelings or Equal: Free of sticks or litter and should be installed a minimum of three inches (3") deep. The purpose of these criteria is to establish design standards that ensure the owner and tenants identification and visual continuity. Unless otherwise approved by the Design Review Board as part of a unified signage plan for a particular project, the following sign standards shall apply: Prospective owners and tenants should review the criteria and then co- ordinate directly with a selected sign contractor. After a drawing has been prepared which meets tenant's approval, final drawings should be submitted to the Design Review Board for approval. Drawings should indicate size, color, typeface, illumination, locations, layout, installation method, and any other pertinent information. Material and color samples should also be submitted. General Sign Recommendations: • No animated, flashing, time /temperature or audible signs will be permitted • All signs and their installation must comply with all local building and electrical codes and bear the UL label. • There must be no exposed raceways, cross - overs, conduits, conductors, tramformers, or junction boxes. • Rotating signs will not be permitted. • No sign may extend above the roofline of the building. • The letter style, color, and material may be selected by tenant with approval by the Design Review Board. Highly stylized or extremely ornate typefaces will not be allowed, unless it is an established trademark. The Village (at Avon) 13 • No advertising placards, banners, pennants, insignia, trademarks or other descriptive material can be affixed or maintained along the glass panels and supports of shop windows and doors or upon the exterior walls of the building. • No sign manufacturer's labels or other identification will be permitted on the exposed surface of signs, except those required by local ordinance which must be in an inconspicuous location. • No sign, advertisement, billboard or advertising structure of any kind may be displayed for public view on any portion of the properties or on any lot except in accordance with the standards set by, and with the prior written approval of the Design Review Board. • All Signs must conform to prescribed setback and sight lines unless otherwise authorized. Commercial/Retail Signs: The length of total sign must not exceed 1/3 of the retail store frontage. The area of the sign must not exceed 10% of the storefront area. Spacing between adjacent signs must be a minimum of four feet (41). The "copy" and "logo" criteria for each sign is as follows: Tenants may only display their established trade names, or simply state their basic products (i.e., "Baker Shoes "). No additional advertising will be allowed (i.e., "Discount Sales ", "Quality Shoes ", etc.). Retail/commercial shops at corner locations will be allowed no more than three signs (two fascias and one arcade). Shops in all other locations will be permitted only two signs (one fascia and one arcade). Free - standing buildings having four (4) exposed elevations will be allowed to have signs only on two primary exposed elevations, unless otherwise approved by the Design Review Board. Office Signs: Signs for office structures are to be monument type. Maximum height allowance will be six feet (6') with twelve feet (12') as a maximum horizontal dimension. General Lighting Recommendations: • Illuminating Engineering Society Criteria and Standards will prevail. • Average foot candle levels will apply: Arterial - 1.0 Collector - 0.6 Local Road - 0.4 Commercial/Business Parking Lots - 0.6 The Village (at Avon) 14 • Mininmum foot candle levels must be approximately 1/3 -1/4 of the average foot candle level. • A minimum uniformity ratio of 3:1 must be maintained, • Light poles will be a maximum of 35', steel, aluminum or fiberglass poles_ • High pressure sodium (hps) lamps will be used. • Controls should be light sensing types and integral to the fixture. The Village (at Avon) 15 TnTAI P 1 R