Loading...
PZC Packet 090208 (2)a -� AV ON C O L O R A D O SITE TOUR (5:00pm — 5:15pm) Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda for September 2, 2008 Avon Town Council Chambers Meetings are open to the public Avon Municipal Building 1400 Benchmark Road Description: Walk down Main Street with Britina Design Group for final review. WORK SESSION (5:15pm — 5.300m) Description: Discussion of Regular Meeting agenda items. Open to the public. REGULAR MEETING (5:30pm) I. Call to Order II. Roll Call III. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda IV. Conflicts of Interest V. Consent Agenda VI. VII • Approval of the August 19, 2008 Meeting Minutes Approval of Resolution 08-06, Recommending Denial of the 'Avon 21' PUD Application for Lots 21, 65A, 65B, Tract Q, and Parcel TK -3, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Main Street Final Review Description: Justin Hildreth, Town Engineer, and the professional design team hired to implement the public way improvements piece of the Town Center West Investment Plan (the Plan), pursuant to the provisions of Title 12, Avon Municipal Code (AMC) and the Implementation section of the Plan, will provide a presentation of the finalized drawings and materials of Main Street. Final Design Review Sutter Residence Property Location: Lot 12, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision / 5712 Wildridge Road East Applicant / Owner: Ryan Sutter Description: This lot will be accessed off of Wildridge Road East and the proposed residence will measure approximately 6,370 sq. ft. including the garage area. The building is designed with gabled roofs and utilizes stucco, stone, wood shingles and wood siding on the exterior walls. VIII. Other Business IX. Adjourn Posted on August 29, 2008 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: • Avon Municipal Building, main lobby • . Avon Recreation Center, main lobby • Alpine Bank, main lobby • Avon Public Library On the Internet at httD./Iwww.avon.oro / Please call (970) 748.4030 for directions ;,, 411 Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission - Draft Meeting Minutes for August 19, 2008 AVON Avon Town Council Chambers Meetings are open to the public C o L o R A D 0 Avon Municipal Building / 400 Benchmark Road WORK SESSION (5:OOpm — 5.30pm) Description: Discussion of Regular Meeting agenda items. Open to the public. REGULAR MEETING (5:30pm) Call to Order The meeting was called to order at approximately 5:40 pm. II. Roll Call All Commissioners were present. III. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda There were no additions or amendments to the Agenda. IV. Conflicts of Interest Commissioner Evans disclosed a potential conflict with Item VII, Timeshare East Sketch Design Review. V. Consent Agenda Approval of the July 15, 2008 Meeting Minutes Commissioner Prince made a correction to the last bullet point of Other Business, to restate that what he said was "blight", and not "abandoned". The correct legal description will also be mentioned for this item. Commissioner Struve made two additional corrections: Item VIII, "the new trees will be planted as soon possible" to correct "as close as possible;" and Item VI, to strike his name from the motion as opposed. Commissioner Goulding moved to approve the consent agenda, as amended. The motion passed unanimously. VI. Final Design Review Speculative Residence Property Location: Lot 113, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision / 2070 Beaver Creek Point Applicant., TAB Associates / Owner. BBG Investments, LLC Description: Sketch Design review for a single-family residence on a Beaver Creek Point property. The structure measures approximately square feet and will utilize wood siding, stone and stucco on the exterior walls. Discussion: Jared Barnes presented Staff's report and highlighted the discussion items from the July 15, 2008 Sketch Design review meeting. Jared continued to discuss the report, and clarified the recommended motion. Bill Nutkins, representing TAB and Associates, presented a new drawing to the Commission showing a complete building elevation as viewed from the public right-of-way. He discussed changes to the Landscape Plan since first review. Commissioner Green questioned what changes have taken place, if any, since Sketch Design review. Bill responded that the entrance has been modified in response to comments received with respect to the roof form above the garage. The square footage has been reduced since sketch design as well Commissioner Goulding questioned if there was a way to ensure that the trees will be varied sizes, instead of all either 6' evergreens or 2" aspen trees. Todd cautioned that the height of the structure was close to the absolute maximum allowable height, and that he did not want to see the applicant back in months with a requested change. Commissioner Green questioned why the limits of disturbance were shown so far east of the house. The applicant responded that this was due to the steepness of the lot, and the finished grade contours dictate the limits of disturbance boundaries. Action: Commissioner Goulding moved to approve the Final Design plan for Lot 113, with staff conditions 1-4, and the condition that the additional landscaping comments related to tree size and rabbit brush numbers be incorporated into a new landscape plan; and the light fixture will be resubmitted to staff for approval. Commissioner Roubos seconded the motion and it passed with a unanimously. VII. Sketch Design Review Timeshare East Property Location: Lot 1, Riverfront Subdivision / 42 Riverfront Lane Applicant Aleksandr Sheykhet / Owner: Jim McIntyre, Starwood Vacation Ownership Description: Sketch Design application for the 'Timeshare East' property The design includes two buildings separated at grade: Building East (E), and Building Riverside (R). There are 74 units proposed in the two buildings. The East building is the taller of the two building and includes 58 2 -bedroom units, each with the ability to have a lock -off unit. The Riverside building is positioned between the East building and the Riverfront recreation path. This building contains the remaining 16 2 -bedroom units, also with the ability to have lock -offs. There is no Commercial land use proposed with this phase of development. Discussion: Matt Pielsticker presented the Staff Report. He highlighted the height, uses, and overall design of the two buildings. Staff pointed out the specific guidelines from the Riverfront Guidelines that specifically discuss Lot 1, the subject lot. Matt also pointed out the encroachments onto neighboring lots. Commissioner Green asked if the mock-up is apart of this application, or if it is a separate issue. Staff pointed out that these are two separate issues that deal with the same property. Commissioner Prince clarified that Timeshare West is the building directly to the west of the Westin Building. Commissioner Roubos asked Staff about their lot coverage table. Staff clarified that if this project were approved as submitted there would only be 0.25 acres of remaining building footprints for future development on Lots 5, 6, and 7. Commissioner Green asked for clarification on the encroachments. Matt Pielsticker went through the reduced plan sets to point out the sheets and where the encroachments were on the roof plans. ;4"_ Jim McIntyre, Starwood Vacation Ownership (SVO), clarified the mock-up issue. He clarified that the request was made of East West Partners and not SVO. He also clarified that they had no opinion on whether it should be moved or not. Commissioner Green stated that this is a discussion that should occur after the application is discussed. Jim McIntyre stated that for final design he will ensure that there are no building encroachments. He also discussed the identical materials proposed. Between the Hotel and Timeshare building there are over 40 different materials, colors, and textures and more variation could be visually chaotic. He also wants to state that the building designs help their clients understand that the two buildings are related. Jim McIntyre also believes that the Hotel is to be the grand statement on the site, while the SVO buildings are intended to flank, support, and enhance the hotel so that the entire PUD area comes across as a good composition. Chuck Madison, East West Partners, stated that the original PUD review contemplated that these three buildings, Timeshare East, Timeshare West, and the Westin Hotel, are to be the village center while rest of the buildings are to be a departure from the architecture seen on the buildings. Commissioner Roubos questioned the meaning of the 'village center' comment made by Chuck Madison. Mr. Madison responded that the village center is to be meant in the context of a similar architecture vernacular and roofing materials. Commissioner Prince asked if the two Timeshare buildings are intended to be identical or similar. Chuck and Jim both responded that the detailing is the same and colors are the same but due to the massing they will appear different. The use of stone on the east and north sides of Timeshare East will help create differentiation between the two buildings. Commissioner Green asked staff if they evaluated the parking for this lot with comparison to the PUD. Staff said they did and it is currently in compliance. Chuck Madison stated that the site coverage numbers are the first time he had heard of it. Matt Pielsticker responded that it was more intended to inform the Commission of the buildout process and how much site coverage is left for the PUD. Commissioner Green thanked staff for bringing that information forward. Commissioner Lane stated he has no issues with the architecture and colors that are provided; he stated that his concern is going to be the materials. He went further and questioned the use of a six story stone element. He said that he would prefer that the stone be carried through out the bottom two stories of the building instead of carried up six stories on one element. He clarified that this comment was only an opinion. Jim McIntyre stated that a majority of guests would be accessing these buildings through an underground passage for check-in purposes. Commissioner Lane questioned the fiber cement board material on the north elevation. He also asked if the metal material used on Timeshare West is used on this building. Alexander Sheykhet responded that the board is not metal and that the metal material is used in the reveals and between windows. Commissioner Lane stated that he would like to see the materials play out better, and he would like to see the colors applied to each elevation at Final Design. Commissioner Prince stated that he has no comments. Commissioner Roubos stated that the building appeared to be an apartment building. She stated that she can't see the variations on this building. Jim McIntyre stated that she should be able to visualize that when they submit for final design. Commissioner Roubos said that when she views this design the word 'monotonous' comes to mind. Commissioner Struve said he would not be in favor of this design if it bookended (along with Timeshare West) the Westin Hotel, but he would be in favor of the design bracketing the Westin Hotel. He also said the entry on the north elevation needs to be more prominent. He also commented on the flatness of the river building elevations, and the roof plans. Jim McIntyre stated that they originally had more variations, but were directed by the master architect that it needed to be simplified. Commissioner Struve also commented that the chimneys appeared to be out of scale on the River Building. Commissioner Prince questioned the distance from the River Building to the bike path. Aleksandr said that he would check to see and report back. Commissioner Goulding commented on the architectural hierarchy. He was sensitive to the architectural character due to the prominence of these buildings as viewed from Avon Road and 1-70. Commissioner Goulding also commented there has been no discussion with respect to LEED, and the need for an effort for LEED qualification. He commented that he would allow staff to provide him with compliance confirmation of the requirements of roof plane variation. He also stated that these buildings are not overly attractive and appear to be monolithic. He stated that the East building appears to be very monolithic. Commissioner Goulding stated that he would have concerns if the exact same materials and colors were made in the same manner. He stated that the East Elevation doesn't give him that "Wow" factor that makes a person want to enter this project.' He stated that the massing of all elevations need to be studied as they do not appear to have a great amount of variation — especially the East and North elevations. Commissioner Green stated that he agrees with Commissioner Goulding's comments. He clarified comments made earlier that the two Timeshare buildings can be complementary but certainly not identical. He also stated that color isn't the only item that differentiates two buildings. He commented that the entry elevation, from Avon Road, does lacks a great amount of interest. He stated that the elements on that elevation appear to be generic and do not provide much uniqueness. Commissioner Green wants to see how all three of these buildings come together. He stated that three dimensional views would be a great addition to this review. Commissioner Prince really wants to focus on the elevation of the buildings as viewed from Avon Road. Commissioner Lane questioned the finish materials for the Fireplace vents. The applicant stated that they would be painted to match adjacent materials. Action: No formal action necessary as this is a Sketch Review. The Commissioners then discussed the Mock-up issue. Commissioner Green asked his fellow Commissioners whether it can be removed or moved. Commissioner Goulding stated that if there are areas of the Mock-up that have been applied to the building he would be fine for the Mock-up to be removed if all the materials have been applied to the Timeshare West building. Commissioner Struve will not vote to remove the Mock-up for the Timeshare West building. He is fine with removing the Lodge and the Westin mock-ups, but he would only support a move to the Mock-up for Timeshare West. _rr Chuck Madison requested that he be allowed to talk with his team and have this discussion Tabled and discussed at a later meeting. Action: The Commission took no formal action with respect to the Mockup. VIII. Harry A. Nottingham Park Master Plan Property Location: Tract G, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Description: Pedro Campos, representing Vail Architecture Group, is presenting the Draft Harry A. Nottingham Park Master Plan. The plan outlines future work and timelines for improvements to Nottingham Park as well as current costs associated with those improvements. Discussion: Commissioner Evans asked what the current status is and what the goals of this meeting are. Matt Gennett stated that Pedro Campos will be walking the Commission through the Master Plan and that the goals are to get a recommendation for the Master Plan areas and what the future plans for improvements are. Pedro Campos, Vail Architecture Group (VAg), outlined the proposal and what he wanted from this meeting. He asked for approval of the direction the plan is heading and the hierarchy of the proposed improvements. Sherry Dorward stated that she wanted to ensure that all proposed improvements are wanted and that the proposed five year timeframe is acceptable. Sherry Dorward and Pedro Campos outlined the proposed zones and stated that the zones were broken up due to common uses. Pedro Campos stated that Zone A is the Common Green. He presented a sketch of the envisioned improvements. Commissioner Prince questioned the rotary shown on the sketch near the Recreation Center. Justin Hildreth commented that the rotary is contemplated in the West Town Center Plan, but is not a part of the current Lake Street Improvements. He went further to state that a future Recreation Center Master Plan would propose improvements in that specific area. Pedro Campos presented the proposed Main Street Extension sketch and the Sport/Special Event Area sketch. He pointed out that the Special Event Area contemplated a few more buildings of a similar character that could help enhance the lake edge. Pedro Campos presented the sketch for the Lake Edge and Path. Sherry Dorward stated that this sketch would be best envisioned where the sand beach currently sits. Pedro Campos presented the second sketch for the Lake Edge. Here he highlighted the paths more high speed use and its meandering qualities. Commissioner Prince asked if the trees were intended to be planted throughout the edge between the path and the fence. Sherry Dorward responded that plantings would be placed in scattered spaces, but not throughout because there could be locations where a new fence could be highlighted. Pedro Campos presented Zone C. He stated that one good option would be to move the current playground facilities to the east toward the Recreation Center. Commissioner Evans questioned the need for the second proposed play area in Zone D. He asked that a greater amount of equipment be placed on the east side and that it be focused in one area. Commissioner Struve stated that due to the phasing this does have to be an immediate decision and the decision could be delayed. Pedro Campos stated that these comments were contemplated and that maybe and alternative playground area would be a better option. He presented a few options including one that incorporated the ditch, another which was theme oriented, another was a winter used park, and the final was a climbing space. Pedro Campos also stated that this area could be focused for a younger age group. Commissioner Prince, Roubos, and Evans all stated that the letter submitted by a home owner of one of the neighboring properties wished for the second (western) play area to be removed. Commissioner Green stated that this area should be primarily used for open space, but a secondary play area use. Pedro Campos stated that portals or gateways are a needed asset to signify entrance into the park. He showed a few sketch options of what these entrance gateways could be. Zone E was presented next and Pedro Campos highlighted the future need for facilities for this park. He stated that due to the existing buildings in this area, that this would be the most functional space for the need for improved facilities. Pedro Campos followed with a brief overview of Zone F. Sherry Dorward stated that this is a much later zone and the zone would be redeveloped to highlight a two path system. The final zone, Zone H, was presented as a future redevelopment site with many potential uses. Sherry Dorward presented the proposed phasing plan. Eric Heidemann asked that the Commission to focus on the phasing and priorities. Commissioner Evans stated that he feels that Zones A and C should be the top priorities given the proximity to other current and near future public improvements. Commissioners Green and Roubos agreed with Commissioner Evans' comments. Commissioner Roubos also stated that she felt as though Zone C would be the highest priority. Commissioner Goulding pointed out that a new Pump House fagade is an improvement that is a lower priority, but within a high priority zone. He would suggest that within specific Zones, the list of improvements be further prioritized to help Staff and Council budget for construction. Paul Anderson, Avon Resident, asked if a dog park was left out of this park. Sherry Dorward stated that the dog park was left out of the plan due to the high intensity of other uses. Action: No formal action is necessary. This plan will be presented to Council at their August 26th meeting. IX. Avon 21 PUD Zoning Application — CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING Property Location: Lots 21, 65A, 65B, Tract Q, and Parcel TK -3, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision / 62, 68, and 182 Benchmark Road Applicant/ Owner: Brian Judge, Orion Development Description: The applicant, Pedro Campos of the Vail Architecture Group, representing the owner of the property, EAH, LLC, is proposing a new Planned Unit Development (PUD) and a concurrent Preliminary Plan for Subdivision on a new development site comprised of the properties listed above, which are currently zoned Town Center (TC). The proposed PUD is envisioned to be comprised of three new buildings configured and designed as a contemporary, mixed-use development including retail space, office space, residential and lodging uses. This item was tabled from the August 5, 2008 meeting, following the review of the financial analysis performed by Stan Bernstein and Associates. Discussion: Pedro Campos began his presentation by reviewing Criteria number 2, the conformity with the overall design theme of the Town, sub -area recommendations, and design guidelines of the Town. He explained that there is no unified design theme for the Town. Commissioner Goulding brought up the notes from the July 15, 2008 meeting regarding this review criterion. He cited conflicts with specific elements of the East Town Center (ETC) District Plan that were brought forth at previous hearings. Commissioner Evans was in agreement that the application appeared to conflict with the ETC plan. Brian Judge approached the podium to address the Commissioner comments. He explained that there are clearly variations between this proposal (i.e. roof pitches) and the adopted guidelines of the Town. He felt that this all comes down to tradeoffs in the end. Mr. Judge requested feedback on the specific criteria, instead of 'agreeing to disagree' on this criterion. Pedro continued the presentation by beginning to step through the individual planning principles from the ETC Plan. Commissioner Struve explained the background and development of the ETC Plan, and the intentional 'scaling down' of this district compared to the West Town Center and Main Street area. Pedro responded that the buildings do step back, consistent with the recommendations borne out of the ETC plan. He showed on the building elevations where the buildings intentionally step back on the second, fourth, and sixth floors. Brian Judge explained his philosophy behind the sense of place created by this development, and its relationship to surrounding developments, both existing and potential future redevelopment. He explained his frustration that after six public meetings, he is finally starting to hear comments for the first time. Commissioner Evans opened the meeting for public comment. No comments were received Commissioner Goulding reviewed his notes. He pointed out, for example when looking at criterion number two, there are apparent discrepancies related to height, form, affordable housing, views and implementation when the proposal is compared to the design guidelines. Mr. Goulding highlighted his concern with the affordable housing mitigation. These are not deal killers, he said; however, he wanted to better understand the benefits. Brian Judge explained that they were requesting approximately 99 additional dwelling units; therefore, approximately 12% of the additional units requested would be "professional's units." Mr. Goulding continued by narrowing down his perceived public benefits with this development: a redevelopment of a much needed area of Town, some affordable housing mitigation, the creation of a public plaza, and the realignment of the public way. He did not feel that the benefits presented outweighed the other potential impacts. Mr. Goulding voiced concern with the lack of compliance with staff's (Public Works and Engineering) concerns that were already raised, the potential phasing, tenant relocation, and the general construction impacts to the Town such as tower cranes and contractor parking. He did not feel that these impacts have been adequately addressed. Commissioner Struve highlighted his primary concerns: height, mass and articulation, low pitched roofs, phasing, the disruption to the other Town business and residents, and the lack of attainable housing. Commissioner Roubos was in agreement with Commissioner Goulding with the opinion that parking, height, massing, density, rooflines, preservation of view corridors, employee housing, phasing, precedent to other redevelopment, and existing businesses are all ongoing issues. She disagreed that the roofline is not flat as represented. Ms. Roubos felt that these issues have been expressed at past meetings and this was not the first time these issues were raised. She disagreed with the applicant. Commissioner Prince expressed a concern with the flat appearance of the roofline. He felt that planning principles were the focus up to this meeting. Commissioner Prince echoed the other Commissioners' concerns that were already raised. He liked the feel of the pedestrian plaza and mall space; however, the overall height of the structures remains a great concern. Commissioner Lane voiced concerns with the phasing and attainable housing. He voiced concerns with phasing and massing. He questioned whether or not written design guidelines specifically tied to this development are appropriate. Matt Gannett explained that this is a typical requirement for Planned Unit Developments. Commissioner Lane liked the 'flavor' of the depictions, but would like a verbal background. Commissioner Green did not have issues with the architecture, but continues to struggle with ! the scale of the development as it relates to surrounding development and existing businesses Under Land Use, the scale and intensity of development is a struggle to agree with under these circumstances. When the ETC plan was developed, the tenant size mix of local businesses in the area was focused upon and this proposal might lose some of the tenant mix currently available in the area. Mr. Green continued to explain his perceived conflict with the policy that is to "ensure each development contributes to a healthy jobs balance mix for the Town." Another cited policy that Commissioner Green felt this application conflicts with is "to promote a wide range of residential uses." He stated that if you consider condo-tels and timeshare, fractional units, and 12 professional units a wide range than yes, you would meet this criterion. He did not feel that this development met this specific requirement. Mr. Green continued to point out that "vertical and horizontal mixed use to respond to changing market conditions." In concept this is mixed use. But when you look at the sustainable model, this plan might meet today's needs, but fails to deal with future land use desires in 30 years. Commissioner Green continues to struggle with how to get.around the public benefits of the project, in relation to the character of the Town of Avon. He questioned whether or not the character and height of the development is compatible with existing and planned uses, and the image of Avon. Commissioner Green continued to highlight the workforce housing program, and the struggle to properly address this issue. He felt that the architecture and density could probably be dealt with, but the other issues remain. Mr. Green felt the public benefit is the issue at hand. Commissioner Evans did not agree with the comment made by Commissioner Green that the architectural approach was "appropriate. Commissioner Evans reiterated all of the previous concerns raised by the Commission including phasing, the financial aspects related to phasing, and employee housing. He felt that it lacks adherence to the Town's vision of height, bulk, massing, and use of flat roofs. The residential impacts, traffic study results, and the ratio of public benefits are all concerns. Commissioner Evans went through all of the Comprehensive Plan's Goals and made the determination of either conformance or not. Goal A.1 Collaborate with Eagle County, adjacent municipalities, and other agencies to implement this plan and to ensure Avon's needs and goals are being met - Does not meet. Goal B.1 Provide a compact urban form - Yes, this application appears to meet. Goal B.2 Provide a distinct physical and visual separation between Avon and its surrounding communities that preserves the natural beauty of the surrounding mountains and the Eagle River valley— No. Goal CA Provide a balance of land uses that offers a range of housing options, diverse commercial and employment opportunities, inviting guest accommodations, and high quality civic and recreational facilities, working in concert to strengthen Avon's identity as both a year- round residential community and as a commercial, tourism and economic center.— he did not feel that the range is there. Goal C.2 Ensure that Avon continues to develop as a community of safe, interactive, and cohesive neighborhoods that contribute to the Town's overall character and image.— this does not meet this goal based on the ETC plan. Goal C.3 Use mixed-use development to create a more balanced, sustainable system of land uses — this application meets this goal. Goal CA Encourage sustainable commercial development that enhances Avon's overall economic health, contributes to the community's image and character, and provides residents and visitors with increased choices and services — Until we see a functional phasing plan, this application does not contribute to the economic health of the Town. Goal D.1 Ensure that development and redevelopment is compatible with existing and planned adjacent development and contributes to Avon's community image and character— based on the ETC plan, Commissioner Evans felt that this application does not comply. Goal D.2 Create community gateways and streetscapes that reflect and strengthen Avon's unique community character and image— this application does meet this Goal. Goal D.3 Develop new and continue to enhance existing cultural and heritage facilities, events, and programs that strengthen Avon's community character and image — he felt that this Goal is not applicable. Goal E.1 Ensure that there is a positive environment for small businesses— Commissioner Evans felt that this application utterly failed to demonstrate compliance with this Goal. Goal F.1 Achieve a diverse range of quality housing options to serve diverse segments of the population — fails to meet. Commissioner Evans felt that Goal G.3 is not applicable, but that it does meet Goal G.4 and Goal G.5. Goal H.1 Protect Avon's unique natural setting and its open spaces. — in some aspects it does meet this Goal, but due to the proposed height it may not meet this in other areas. Goal 1.1 Provide an exceptional system of parks, trails, and recreational programs to serve the year-round leisure needs of area residents and visitor— he feels that plaza could be considered open space and therefore could meet this. Goal 1.2 Coordinate and collaborate with surrounding jurisdictions and agencies to develop seamless recreational opportunities — not applicable in his mind. Goal J.1 Utilize this comprehensive plan in all town dealings including capital planning, operation/maintenance of facilities, and programming of events — he noted that applicant states that the proposal meets this Goal. Goal J.2 Ensure cost effective provision and development of public facilities and services. — Commissioner Evans felt that this Goal is addressed with the Engineering Staffs concerns. He continued to review the 12 PUD review Criteria and the redevelopment standards based on current zoning. Commissioner Evans felt that, in the end, Criteria 2 Conformity and compliance with the overall design theme of the town, the sub -area design recommendations and design guidelines adopted by the town — this application does not meet; Criteria 3 Design compatibility with the immediate environment, neighborhood, and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, character, and orientation — does not meet; Criteria 4 Uses, activity, and density which provide a compatible, efficient, and workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity — meets. Criteria 5 Identification and mitigation or avoidance of natural and/or geologic hazards that affect the property upon which the PUD is proposed — is not applicable, Criteria 6 Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions designed to produce a functional development responsive and sensitive to natural features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the community — appears to meet; Criteria 7 A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing on and off-site traffic circulation that is compatible with the town transportation plan — yes; Criteria 8 Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to optimize and preserve natural features, recreation, views and function — yes; Criteria 9 Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, functional and efficient relationship throughout the development of the PUD. The phasing plan shall clearly demonstrate that each phase can be workable, functional and efficient without relying upon completion of future project phases— Does not meet the intent, based on the financial model produced at the last meeting; Criteria 10 Adequacy of public services such as sewer, water, schools, transportation systems, roads, parks, and police and fire protection — not demonstrated yet; Criteria 11 That the existing streets and roads are suitable and adequate to carry anticipated traffic within the proposed PUD and in the vicinity of the proposed PUD — until traffic study is complete and engineering signed off it has not been met; Criteria 12 a) The application demonstrates a public purpose which the current zoning entitlements cannot achieve - there isn't anything that could not be achieved that the current zoning already permits; Criteria 12 b) Approval of the zoning application provides long term economic, cultural or social community benefits that are equal to or greater than potential adverse impacts as a result of the changed zoning rights - does not meet; Criteria 12 cl The flexibility afforded in approval of the zoning application will result in better siting of the development, preserving valued environmental and cultural resources, and increasing the amount of public benefit consistent with the community master plan documents - yes, based on plaza and roadways; however, the zoning application is not necessary for these improvements. In total, Commissioner Evans felt that the application conflicted with 8 of the 12 mandatory PUD review criteria. Matt Gennett recommended tabling to the September 16`" meeting instead of the September 2nd meeting to give the applicant adequate time to provide outstanding information, such as architectural design guidelines, and to respond to technical concerns raised by other department; and to give Planning Staff time to review such material. Brian Judge explained his frustration with the process, the comments received, the lack of direction throughout the process, and the inability to complete his slide presentation. Action: Commissioner Green moved to table the application to the September 2nd, 2008 meeting in order to further discuss the comments. Commissioner Struve seconded the motion and all commissioners were in favor. The motion passed unanimously with a 6-0 vote. Commissioner Goulding was absent. The motion and resulting action were then further discussed. Mr. Judge did not feel that he could cure all of the issues that were expressed during the public hearing by the September 2nd meeting. He requested a vote at this time and to reconsider the motion. Commissioner Evans questioned his fellow Commissioners to see if anybody would like to entertain a reconsideration of the action to table. Commissioner Green motioned to reconsider the motion that had already been approved. The motion was seconded, and the motion to overturn the previous motion to table passed with a 5-1 vote. A discussion continued relating to the ability to vote on the application tonight, and bring forth a resolution memorializing the comments made during the hearing. New Motion: Commissioner Roubos made a motion to recommend DENIAL of the. PUD, as submitted, to the Town Council based upon the findings that this application does not meet the 12 PUD Criteria listed in 17.20.110 (AMC), with further documentation to be provided at the September 2"d meeting via resolution. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Struve. The motion to DENY passed with a 5-1 vote. X. Other Business • Community Survey to be handed in by Friday. • Thursday Open House for Main Street Design • Water District and painting • PUD Process discussion • Evans may be late or absent for the September 2, 2008 meeting XI. Adjourn r The meeting was adjourned at approximately 10:45pm. a TOWN OF AVON PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION No. 08-06 A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING DENIAL TO TOWN COUNCIL OF THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) AMENDMENT APPLICATION FOR LOTS 21, 65A, 65B, TRACT Q, AND PARCEL TK -3, BLOCK 2, BENCHMARK AT BEAVER CREEK, TOWN OF AVON, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO WHEREAS, Pedro Campos of the Vail Architecture Group, representing the owner of the property, EAH, LLC, has applied for a PUD Amendment for Lots 21, 65A and 656; Tracts Q & R; And Parcel No. TK -3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, pursuant to Section 17.20.110 of the Avon Municipal Code; as presented in the original application dated February 6, 2008; and WHEREAS, Pursuant to the pertinent noticing procedures required by law, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon held public hearings on June 3, 2008, June 17, 2008, July 1, 2008, July 15, 2008, August 5, 2008, and August 19, 2008; at which time the applicant was given an opportunity to present their proposal for a new PUD and hear the feedback from both the Commission and members of the public, in addition to the written comments from Staff regarding this PUD request; and WHEREAS, The Planning and Zoning Commission considered the following criteria when evaluating this application: 1. Conformance with the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan Goals and Objectives. 2. Conformity and compliance with the overall design theme of the town, the sub -area design recommendations and design guidelines of the Town. 3. Design compatibility with the immediate environment, neighborhood, and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, character, and orientation. 4. Uses, activity, and density which provide a compatible, efficient, and workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity. 5. identification and mitigation or avoidance of natural and/or geologic hazards that affect the property upon which the PUD is proposed. 6. Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions designed to produce a functional development responsive and sensitive to natural features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the community. 7. A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing on and off site traffic circulation that is compatible with the Town Transportation Plan. 8. Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to optimize and preserve natural features, recreation, views and function. 9. Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, functional, and efficient relationship throughout the development of the PUD. The phasing plan shall clearly demonstrate that each phase can be workable, functional and efficient without relying upon completion of future project phases. 10. Adequacy of public services such as sewer, water, schools, transportation systems, roads, parks, and police and fire protection. 11. That the existing streets and roads are suitable and adequate to carry anticipated traffic within the proposed PUD and in the vicinity of the proposed PUD. 12. That the PUD or amendment to PUD requested provides evidence of substantial compliance with the following public purpose provisions, as outlined in Section 17.28.085 of the Avon Municipal Code (as follows): Zoning applications The Town shall consider the following public benefit criteria when evaluating zoning applications: (1) The application demonstrates a public purpose which the current zoning entitlements cannot achieve. T (2) Approval of the zoning application provides long-term economic, cultural or social community benefits that are equal to or greater than potential adverse impacts as a result of the changed zoning rights. (3) The flexibility afforded in approval of the zoning application will result in better siting of the development, preserving valued environmental and cultural resources and increasing the amount of public benefit consistent with the community master plan documents. WHEREAS, Section 17.20.110(h) of the Avon Municipal Code states the following: It shall be the burden of the applicant to demonstrate that submittal material and the proposed development plan comply with each of the following design criteria or demonstrate that one (1) or more of them is not applicable, or that a particular development solution consistent with the public interest has been achieved; and WHEREAS, after holding a public hearing at their August 19, 2008 meeting, the Planning & Zoning Commission made the following findings with respect to the subject application: 1. The application fails to demonstrate compliance with the applicable twelve (12) principle PUD design criteria, as required by Title 17.20.110(h) of the Avon Municipal Code, and as further detailed in the meeting minutes from the August 19, 2008 hearing which are a part of the materials packet for the September 2, 2008 meeting. 2. The applicant has failed to prove to the Commission that the submittal material and the proposed development plan comply with each applicable PUD design criteria, or that a development solution consistent with the public interest is available for any given conflict with a specific criterion. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon, Colorado, hereby recommends that the Avon Town Council deny the PUD Amendment application for Lots 21, 65A and 65B; Tracts Q & R; And Parcel No. TK -3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, Town of Avon, Eagle County Colorado, with the findings set forth herein. „r ADOPTED AND REAFFIRMED THIS 2nd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2008 Signed. Chair Attest: Secretary Date: Date: ,T,. Memo To: Town of Avon Planning and Zoning Commission From: Justin Hildreth, P.E., Town Engineergty (- Date: August 28, 2008 Re: Avon Main Street Streetscape Improvements— Presentation of Final Design Summary: The Main Street project consists of a new road from Avon Road to the east portal of Harry A. Nottingham Park in the current location of the pedestrian mall. The project will also include utility, drainage, and roadway work on the area immediately east of the Avon Public Library, and will consist of a shared vehicular/pedestrian roadway that prioritizes public gathering spaces, plazas, and unimpeded pedestrian movements. The streetscape design follows guidelines and concepts set forth in the Town Center West Investment Plan. Britina Design Group (Britina) will present the final design for the streetscape, which is included as Exhibit A. The meeting will start with a presentation by Britina and then the Avon Planning and Zoning Commission will be given a tour of the site. Following the tour, Britina will complete the presentation and request approval of the final design. Chronology • August 14, 2007: The Town Center West Investment Plan and Avon Urban Renewal Plan is adopted by the Town Council, forming the Avon Urban Renewal Authority • March 11, 2008: American Civil Constructors is awarded the construction contract for Lake Street • Match 25, 2008: Britina Design Group is awarded the design contract for Main Street Streetscape Improvements Public Process • May 22,2008: Joint Public Open House with the Nottingham Park Master Plan • May 29, 2008: First stakeholder meeting for the Main Street Design Project • July 9, 2008: Second stakeholder group meeting presenting two design options • July 10, 2008: Second public open house presenting two design options • July 15, 2008: Planning and Zoning Commission hearing presenting the preliminary design options • July 22, 2008: Avon Urban Renewal Authority hearing presenting the preliminary design options • August 13, 2008: Third stakeholder meeting presenting preliminary final design • August 13, 2008: Second Planning and Zoning Commission hearing presenting preliminary final design • August 21, 2008: Third public open house presenting the preliminary final design • August 26, 2008: Avon Urban Renewal Authority hearing approving the final design Stakeholder Grouo In order to collaboratively create a better design and detail for the Main Street Streetscape, Britina formed a stakeholder group comprised of public officials, local business owners, library representatives, adjacent property owners, property managers, community representatives, and Town of Avon staff, including members from the Engineering, Community Development, Recreation and Public Works departments. There have been three meetings with the group, the first to present the project and gain initial feedback, the second to select design themes for the project, and the third to present a preliminary final design. Avon Main Street Streetscape Improvements August 27, 2008 Page 2 of 12 Public Outreach One joint public meeting in conjunction with the Harry A. Nottingham Park Master Plan and two public meetings dedicated to Main Street have also been held. Approximately 20 to 30 people attended each of the public open houses. Avon Arts Council In addition to the stakeholder group, Britina has been meeting with the Avon Arts Council to facilitate public art selection. It is anticipated that the public art will be incorporated into several of the plaza areas and into the actual streetscape design. Artists are currently preparing concepts for presentation to the Avon Arts Council at the end of September. The final art selection shall occur at the end of October. Background: As an overview, the West Town Center District was envisioned to be the 'heart' and central gathering place of the Avon community, and reinforce the future role of the district outlined in the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan: "Social, cultural, intellectual, political, and recreational gatherings occur in this district. In addition, the district acts as the common ground between the full-time residents, part-time residents and destination guests through diverse retail and entertainment opportunities. The West Town Center District will be an intensely developed mixed-use, pedestrian -oriented area that serves as the primary focus for residential and lodging development within the overall Town Center." As part of the West Town Center plan implementation, the Town of Avon has begun several important reconstruction efforts within the district, including completion of Avon Station, the realignment of Benchmark Road (Lake Street), and the on-going master planning and conceptual design efforts for Harry A. Nottingham Park. The Main Street streetscape is the next project funded and undertaken by the Avon Urban Renewal Authority, and will serve as a catalyst for the development contemplated in the adopted planning documents. Discussion: Main Street is perhaps the most critical public infrastructure project undertaken in Avon since the Avon Road roundabouts and will serve as the main attraction and public gathering space in the Town Center West District. Success of this project is critical, and the design relatively complex, due to private property owners bordering much of the site, fixed building entry grades, vacant lots, and numerous existing and future utilities, including water, sanitary sewer, storm sewer and the Metcalf irrigation ditch. Two options, A and B were presented to the Public, Stakeholders, Planning and Zoning Commission and the Town Council. The majority at all of the meetings preferred the Option A design. As a Result, Main Street's final design is grounded in the forms and elements of the preliminary 'Option A' design. As such, it is a playful, narrative walk through the history, culture and forms of the Avon community and the physical forms of the valley floor. The soft, rounded elements of the design create a quiet, gentle and informal experience, punctuated by whimsical art pieces that illustrate the history, culture and landscape of Avon. In order to incorporate a modern aesthetic, the embracing forms of the design are 'carved' and 'polished' to reflect a sophisticated interpretation of the natural landscape. Avon Main Street Streetscape Improvements August 27, 2008 Page 3 of 12 Although the final design is largely based on the theme and design of 'Option A', elements of the refined design also draw from 'Option B'. For example, the connection between the Library and Recreation Center, the more direct route of 'Option B' was preferred, and therefore, the overall design of 'Option A' was adjusted to incorporate this layout. Aesthetically, the final design reflects a refined version of the natural, rounded forms of preliminary 'Option A' and its graceful vocabulary of rough, real materials adapted and shaped into an elegant and sophisticated palette. The design focuses on the five center or plaza spaces outlined in the Town Center West Investment Plan including Lake Street/Main Street Plaza, Library/Recreation Center Plaza, Sheraton/Seasons Piazza, Lettuce Shed Plaza and the Eastern Gateway at Benchmark Road. The Lake Street/Main Street Plaza is designed to connect Main Street with Harry A. Nottingham Park and includes stone seating walls, a water feature and an overlook of the Park. The Library/Recreation Center Plaza is designed as a transitional space that connects the Recreation Center to the Library and retains space for the Librarys programming. This space contains an art feature, terraced landscaped garden and an overlook to Beaver Creek. The Seasons/Sheraton Plaza is envisioned to be a piazza and the primary gathering area for Main Street. It will include art integrated into the streetscape, decorative lighting and plenty of moveable tables and chairs. Lettuce Shed Plaza is envisioned to be the meeting and orienting place for Main Street because of the movement from the Riverfront Subdivision, gondola and Avon Station to Main Street. It will include Rush lighting and an artist designed fire pit. The eastern gateway is the primary transition and entryway from Avon Road. It will contain a gateway art feature designed to announce Main Street. Also, Lettuce Shed Lane will contain landscaping and historical elements relating to Avon's history. Avon West Town Center District Investment Plan In attempt to address the concerns of the Planning and Zoning commission communicated at the August 13, 2008 hearing, Staff correlated the Main Street design to the applicable sections of the Avon West Town Center District Investment Plan (Investment Plan). The Residential, Commercial and Industrial Design Review Guidelines do not apply to Public Improvements in the Right -of -Way. Section II of the Investment Plan includes the design guidelines of the Avon West Town Center District. The design guidelines are primarily for the existing and future buildings in the Avon Town Center District Area, including Lot 61, The Seasons, Avon Center, The Sheraton, Parking Structure, Town Hall and Nottingham Inn. There are several guidelines in Section B -District Wide, Section C -Streets and Public Spaces and Section D -Public Signage that apply to the Main Street project. The following outlines the relevant sections of the Investment Plan and explains how the Main Street design complies with and exceeds the guidelines in the Investment Plan. B.4 Civic Art Civic art can provide visitors as well as residents with multiple and layered expressions of a history and culture that is unique to a place. The West Main Street civic art program has gone hand-in-hand with the overall streetscape design. As a result, the proposed Civic Art program exceeds the requirements outlined in the Investment Plan. From the beginning of the design process, the project team art consultant, McGrath and Braun, has worked with both Avon Main Street Streetscape Improvements August 27, 2008 Page 4 of 12 the project team and the Avon Arts Council to determine the location, feel, design and character of the West Main Street public art. By integrating public art from the beginning of the design process, our team has benefited from a comprehensive approach to the art of Main Street. Not only do we have significant public art pieces at each center along the street, we also have allowed the public art process to infuse the entire streetscape design with an artistic feel and character. Eastern Gatewav The Eastern Gateway will identify West Main Street with a grand presence and will be easily visible from Avon Road. The gateway will set the tone of the street by utilizing sustainable and indigenous materials where possible. The piece will incorporate a variety of textures and materials making it visually and tactually interesting from all angles, day and night, and in all seasons. Lettuce Shed Lane History Panels These interpretive panels will be placed along the length of the Lettuce Shed Lane pedestrian walk, the primary north -south corridor used by visitors to Avon. The panels will illustrate Avon's history from early times to modern day, providing residents and visitors a sense of context for Avon as a unique place. Lettuce Shed Lane Plaza Intended as an outdoor "living room," this piece will act as both a focal point along the street and as the "hearth" for the plaza space. This fire -based piece will refer to Avon's history as well as look to Avon's future by incorporating sustainable and indigenous materials where possible. Seasons/Sheraton Plaza The Seasons / Sheraton Plaza art piece will provide the central focal point for the plaza. While primarily a horizontal piece, elements such as columns, boundary towers and festoon lighting will emphasize and enclose the piece. Library and Recreation Center Pedestrian Corridor This installation will create a colorful, punctuated, multi -piece passageway for pedestrian traffic that is interesting in day, night and all seasons. Based on whimsical references to Avon's stories, symbols and history, the art will use bright colors, variety of textures and approachable scale to attract children and adults. Library Roundabout Capitalizing on the interplay between the Library and the name of the Town, this playful installation will juxtapose "A"'s depicted in a variety of typefaces and colors to form a tower structure. The "A" tower will act as the centerpiece to the library roundabout and the visual terminus to the Library & Rec Center Plaza pedestrian walk. The "A" tower is well located because it relates library users and the letter A for Avon. Nottingham Plaza Water Feature The Nottingham Plaza water feature will be the iconic western gateway to Main Street, while also serving as a playful gathering space, overlook to the park, and performance area. The water feature will incorporate materials from the Eastern Gateway, such as stone and metal, and provide a changing series of water and Avon Main Street Streetscape Improvements August 27, 2008 Page 5 of 12 lighting depending on the events and seasons. The water feature will be designed to have substance so that is has a presence in the winter months, when it is not operating. B.5 Character Misrepresentations and "Theme" Environments The Investment Plan proposes a modern mountain aesthetic instead of literal interpretations or mimicry of Victorian architecture, mining vernacular, and architectural styles found primarily in the European Alpine environs. For the West Main Street project, the design team has embraced the Town of Avon standard of using materials that are authentic and high quality, and apply them in a design that is a modern representation of a traditional Colorado mountain aesthetic. The primary streetscape material is a local Colorado stone with a warm palette of brown, gold, red and buff. This stone is used to highlight the central gathering spaces of the streetscape, and will be installed in the ground plane, the vertical bollard elements and the public art pieces. Moving away from the central gathering spaces, the materials continue to reinforce the rich colors of the native stone, done in both pavers and colored concrete. Overall, the West Main Street design draws from the natural, rich palette of materials indigenous to Colorado, and applies these in a fresh and modern aesthetic. B.6 Important Public Views From the beginning of the West Main Street design, our team has been aware of the significant public views identified in the Investment Plan. The final design highlights and reinforces these views. View West across Nottingham Park toward Bellvache Ridge and the Benchmark Lake Looking West across Nottingham Park, the view is framed and highlighted by a public art feature/fountain that rises up on either side of the central plaza. In the center of the sculpture, the water element acts as an interactive feature whose transparency allows the view to take precedence. Library & Recreation Center view to Beaver Creek and Rockv Cliff In order to frame the view to the mountain at the Library and Recreation Center, the central pathway between the two uses was aligned along the view corridor axis. Public art panels on either side of the pathway help to channel and reinforce and complement the view. Lettuce Shed Lane View to Westin. Beaver Creek and Rockv Cliff In order to reinforce the view corridor along Lettuce Shed Lane, the final design creates an open frame toward the mountain. All streetscape elements hug the sides of the corridor, which not only preserves the view, but also allows for much-needed screening of the service area of the Seasons property. Eastern Gatewav View to Main Street, Rockv Cliff and Beaver Creek Creating an interesting, inviting and dynamic view into the redeveloped Main Street was one of the primary goals of the streetscape design. By placing the public art element in line with the Main Street axis, as well as Avon Main Street Streetscape Improvements August 27, 2008 Page 6 of 12 creating a large and open public plaza around the element, both auto and pedestrian visitors will have a view into the redeveloped streetscape and the surrounding mountain resort landscape. B.7 Solar Orientation and Shading Exposure Flexibility is the key to achieving a streetscape experience that is comfortable during all times of the year. For the West Main Street design, we have several layers of outdoor seating, each of which can be used comfortably in both cold and warm weather. In order to help inform our awareness of solar exposure along the street, our team completed a shade study of the site during each season and throughout the day. The final placement of benches, chairs and other outdoor seating was informed by the shade study data. In the cold months, we have specified movable outdoor chairs and benches that can be repositioned throughout the day to take advantage of sun exposure. In addition, we have designed fixed stone benches in the open green spaces that will be shaded by deciduous trees in the summer, but will allow the warm rays of the sun to heat the space and material during the cooler winter months. The chosen street furniture also takes climatic comfort into consideration by using a sustainable wood material on the bench seats, which will be cooler in the summer and warm and comfortable in the cooler months. During warmer weather outdoor seating to is positioned utilize the natural shade of trees to provide a cool and sun -protected place to rest. 8.8 Water Resources The Investment Plan requires stringent management of stormwater runoff to reduce surface water pollution, prevent flooding and conserve potable water. Numerous best management practices are included in the Main Street project to meet these requirements. Stormwater Manaeement Plan The stormwater management plan includes the local drainage facilities required to drain the proposed roadway. As part of the water quality design, hydrodynamic separation systems will be used to remove sediment and total suspended solids. This is the same method used to treat the water quality on Lake Street. The historic drainage patterns of the Main Street corridor and the public storm sewer outfall will be maintained. Stormwater Best Management Practices The surface treatment for Main Street is proposed to consist of pavers and concrete that will include an underdrain system that will direct any runoff that penetrates the surface to the public storm sewer through the underdrain. The underdrain extends to the northern plant beds where runoff drains through the soil and functions like a porous landscape detention best management practice. Avon Main Street Streetscape Improvements August 27, 2008 Page 7 of 12 C.1 Utilities As required in Section C.1 of the Investment Plan, all utilities along Main Street are located in either unobtrusive underground vaults or within raised planting beds, screened by vegetation. Some examples of low visibility utility applications along Main Street are the plug outlets located at or below grade in tree grates and covered at the bottom of light fixtures. In addition, concert -level electrical service will be available at the Sheraton/Season's Plaza, and the Nottingham Park Plaza — hidden in raised planting beds or underground vaults. In some cases, low profile pedestals may be located with planting and screened. Transformers and other large above -ground utility structures are prohibited on Main Street and will be located on the peripheral of the project and screened by landscaping. Throughout Main Street, the utilities were designed to accommodate both daily and special event needs in a manner that is unobtrusive yet comprehensive. At the West end and the Sheraton plaza, electrical disconnects for staging with be incorporated into the hardscape features. C.2 Paving Materials Section C.2 of the Investment Plan requires pavement materials that include brick, concrete unit pavers, stone pavers, and/or concrete with additives such as sandblasted texture, unique scoring patterns and color. Asphalt is not permitted on Main Street, Lettuce Shed Lane or Avon Station. Natural materials, such as stone, are being used throughout the design in various applications including paving, seating, columns, public art pieces and landscape areas. For example, several types of stone paving have been specified to enhance each plaza space. The seat walls and retaining walls are faced and capped with stone and the on -street planters are contained by a low stone curb. Stone beams will be placed in the planting bed bands and will serve as natural benches. In addition, stone and wood mulch are proposed for all planting beds. Finally, the design incorporates extensive landscape enhancements in the form of trees, planting beds (shrubs, ornamental grasses and perennials), planter pots with annuals and turf areas. Local Stone Paving At each plaza space on West Main Street, a variety of natural stone paving material is specified. In addition, stone is being specified for bollards, seat walls, columns and natural benches. Because this stone material will need to coordinate with the stone used by artists for elements like the Eastern Gateway sculpture and the Harry A. Nottingham Park fountain, the design team have been working closely with the selected artists to find a local quarry that can supply the most attractive, durable and desirable regionally available stone product. Concrete Pavers In addition to stone paving, concrete pavers are specified at each plaza space. We have specified two (2) color combinations, alternating as the pattern radiates away from each plaza center. The pavers mimic cobble and come in a variety of sizes to create random ashlar pattern. To further the "piazza" feel of the Seasons/Sheraton plaza, the concrete pavers are organized in a circular pattern. The concrete pavers are supplied locally and were chosen for their durability and character. Avon Main Street Streetscape Improvements August 27, 2008 Page 8 of 12 Colored Concrete Paving The majority of the remaining paving areas will be paved with colored concrete. Scored, integral colored concrete with a broom finish is specified for the roadway areas. Scored, integral colored concrete with a sand finish is specified for the sidewalks connecting the plaza spaces and patio spaces adjacent to existing buildings. Several additional integral colored concrete bands with sand finish radiate from each plaza space, enhancing the ground plane and providing a separation between various types of paving. C.3 On -Street Parking Section C.3 of the Investment Plan encourages on -street parking to compliment the necessary commercial and residential components of the area and to serve as a buffer between moving traffic and the pedestrian environment. On -street parallel parking is provided on the north side of Main Street except in the plaza areas. C.4 Grading As specified in Section C.4 of the Investment Plan the grading has created smooth transitions for a safe pedestrian experience and comfortable accessibility for the elderly and disabled. The grading is designed to minimize its prominence so that Main Street appears to be flat and comfortable despite the 20 feet of grade differential from the Eastern Gateway to the Harry A. Nottingham Park Plaza. Gradinz and Stormwater Runoff The grading directs runoff to drain overland to either the northern plant beds or the curb inlets located along the southern Main Street flowline. Runoff is then conveyed by the public storm sewer downstream to the Eagle River. The northern plant beds are equipped with an underdrain system that provides porous landscape detention, a best management practice that removes sediment and debris prior to entering the storm sewer system. In addition, we are proposing to use a hydrodynamic separation system, such as Stormceptor or Vortechs, is proposed to remove trash, sediment and the total suspended solids from the stormwater in the public storm sewer system. Nottingham Park At the interface between West Main Street and Nottingham Park, the slight change in elevation between the Park and the street is used to create a sense of `overlook' between the two areas. Both the main plaza space and the side seat walls gradually embrace the slope and use it to create a series of terraced seating areas along each side of the main plaza space. Library/Rec Center There is an existing drop in grade between the Library and the Rec Center. In the redeveloped streetscape, this change in grade was considered when choosing the pathway between the two uses, so that the final Avon Main Street Streetscape Improvements August 27, 2008 Page 9 of 12 pathway orientation was plotted to ensure the most gradual slope. In addition, the grade change between the redeveloped streetscape and the sunken library plaza was formalized with a wall and railing that permits the Library to have an at -grade outdoor plaza protected with a wall and fence. Central Public Plaza In the Season's/Sheraton Plaza, careful consideration of the grades allows the main plaza space to appear flat and open, without obvious grading or central drains. In our experience, plaza spaces require minimal grade changes in their central gathering areas to be successful, and we have ensured all plaza spaces are carefully graded to appear smooth and flat. Foundation Walls No additional foundation walls are exposed in the West Main Street project area. C.6 Pedestrian Corridors, Paths, Steps and Ramps The Main Street streetscape design functions as a large pedestrian -only plaza, with cars having secondary importance to people, as specified in Section C.6 of the Investment Plan. As such, the entire streetscape is designed to have the look and feel of a plaza space, including the roadway surface, which utilizes colored and textured concrete in varying bands of color that mimic the appearance of a large sidewalk space. Curb and Gutter Although the Investment Plan calls for Main Street to be without curb and gutter, the final design allows for curb and gutter in some sections of the street. This change was instituted to allow for adequate drainage and snow removal within the project area and has been approved the Avon Urban Renewal Authority. Steps and Ramps In order to increase the accessibility of Main Street, ramps were used to make changes in grades wherever possible, and between all significant public spaces. Where steps are needed, they are designed to have a wide, shallow appearance that is visually elegant and more accessible than a traditional -height riser and tread. The roadway ramps to meet the plaza grades as an additional traffic calming measure while keeping the plaza spaces at a uniform grade for the pedestrians. C.7 Walls, Fences and screening Stone seating walls are used throughout the streetscape to provide seating and grade retention. In some areas, these walls are carved from slabs of natural stone, and in others, they are faced with a natural stone product with rich texture per Section C.7 of the Investment Plan. The fences that will be required in the Library/Recreation Center Plaza and potentially along Lot B will match the Avon Station fence, and complies with Section C.7 of the Investment Plan. Additional care has been taken to have the design screen existing back door facilities for some of the buildings. For instance Lettuce Shed Lane has been designed so that the historical panels and landscaping screen the utilities and loading dock of the Seasons. Avon Main Street Streetscape Improvements August 27, 2008 Page 10 of 12 C.8 Street Furnishings The Main Street design utilizes a palette of street furnishings that reinforce the overall aesthetic of the redeveloped streetscape and complies with the guidelines outlined in Section C.8 of the Investment Plan. The following specified street furnishings are also constructed of recycled materials, where appropriate: Benches (both freestanding and carved stone slab) Bear -Proof Trash Receptacles Moveable Cafe Chairs and Tables Game Tables Stone Bollards Combination Ski Racks/Bike Racks/Newspaper Racks Planter Pots Decorative Tree Grates C.9 Plant Material In order to minimize the amount of imperivious surfaces along West Main Street, planters, trees, lawns and planting beds were placed throughout the spaces. Within these 'green' areas, native, hardy and drought -tolerant plants that are also beautiful and visually interesting across seasons are specified. All plant material and location of plantings that have been specified complies with Section C.9 of the investment plan. Irrigation In those areas that require irrigation, low-water drip systems have been specified. This includes the on - street planter pots, which will be irrigated with an internal drip system that will reduce maintenance costs and water use. The planting beds will be irrigated with an automated low-water drip system. The lawn areas will be planted with a low-water rhizome turf -type tall fescue, which provides a durable, green turf area suitable for activity while demanding far less water than bluegrass. The lawn areas will be irrigated with an automated spray system. Amended native topsoil will be utilized rather than imported material. Street Tree Caliper The caliper of the trees will range from 3" to 4", depending on the species and location per Section C.9 of the Investment Plan. C.10 Lighting Creative and artistic lighting is proposed through the Main Street design in addition to the standard Avon West Town Center District standard street lighting fixture. All of the lights will have timers and shut -offs to ensure they are only light when required and are compliant with the Avon Night Lighting Ordinance. Avon Main Street Streetscape Improvements August 27, 2008 Page 11 of 12 True Calor Rendering All lighting will have a CRI of greater than 70 wherever possible, which will provide true color rendering of people, materials and streetscape details. LED Lighting Currently all landscape accent lights, and in -grade lighting will be specified as LED sources. Seasonal Lighting Street trees will have LED holiday lighting attached. In addition, the additional LED fixtures along the street will have the ability to display seasonally -appropriate colors. C.11 Activities and Special Events All of the major plazas and public activity spaces provide access to electricity for special events. Electrical outlets are proposed for each tree and adequate power will be provided at the Harry A. Nottingham Park Plaza and the Sheraton/Seasons Piazza space. Main Street is designed to be cosed to accommodate large events such as fairs, markets and festivals. Also, The following elements are located in each plaza: Eastern Gatewav Interactive public art feature Lettuce Shed Plaza Fire Pit Integrated Seating Season's/Sheraton Plaza Game Tables Moveable Chairs and Tables Interactive Art Feature in Paving Library/Rec Center Plaza Children's Library Garden Open Green Play Hill Public Art Panels "A" Sculpture Nottingham Park Plaza Interactive Water Sculpture Performance Area Avon Main Street Streetscape Improvements August 27, 2008 Page 12 of 12 C.12 Carts and Vendors Areas for vending carts have been created along the pedestrian pathways between each plaza space. Electricity will be available for the vending carts. In addition, we recommend movable vending carts be permitted in the Season's/Sheraton Plaza until the adjacent properties have been developed. C.14 Snow Removal and Storage At the August 26, 2008, Avon Urban Renewal Authority hearing, Staff received direction to minimize snowmelt while attempting to implement it in an environmentally responsible manner. Therefore, the snowmelt system for Main Street will connect to the Waste Heat Recovery project from the Avon Wastewater Plant. The current schedule for the Waste Heat Recovery project is for the design to be completed in 2009 and the facility be constructed in 2010. Thus the Public Works Department will need to manually remove snow for at least one winter season until such a facility is established. The Public Works Department will be requesting special equipment to remove the snow to protect the streetscape design. The Streetscape design and snowmelt areas will be designed to have snow storage and snow accumulation areas while still providing for a safe pedestrian experience. Furnishings and other site fixtures will be enhanced by snow accumulation. Section D. Public Signage The public signage guidelines in Section D of the Investment Plan provide detailed guidelines for exterior way -finding and establish a controlled program for the Town Center district. Avon Station and Lake Street projects follow the public signage guidelines and have set the color palate and sign design. The signs proposed for the Main Street -project are of identical design, including the color and masonry, to the signs at Avon Station and Lake Street. Recommendations: Approve the Main Street final design because it complies with the Avon West Town Center District Investment Plan. Attachments: Exhibit A- Main Street Streetscape Improvements Final Design Turf Steps Newspaper Rack Sunken Library Plaza Retaining Wall with Railing Library & Rec Center Plaza Art Feature A" Sculpture -Art Feature Bench -Type B Concrete Paving -Type C Concrete Paving -Type B Deciduous Shade Tree Stone Paving -Type C Concrete Paving -Type D Concrete Pavers -Type C Concrete Pavers -Type Lettuce Shed Lane -Art Feature Wayfinding Feature - Concrete Pavers -Type A - Concrete Pavers -Type B - Concrete Paving -Type E - Pedestrian Light Fixture - Concrete Paving -Type A - Stone Seat Wall Nottingham Plaza Water Feature Planter Pot -Type C Gateway Signage Trash Receptacle Stone Bollards Planter Pot -Type B Tree Grate -Type A Planter Pot -Type A Concrete Paving -Type A Stone Paving -Type B Decorative Column with Festoon Lighting Movable Tables & Chairs Concrete Pavers -Type E Concrete Pavers -Type F Seasons - Sheraton Plaza An Feature Stone Paving -Type A Tree Grate -Type B Adirondack Chairs Lettuce Shed Focal Point - An Feature Rush Lighting Feature Wayfinding Feature Planting Bed Bench -Type A Bike Racks Concrete Paving -Type F Ornamental Tree Stone Bench Eastern Gateway - Art Feature Existing Tree Wayfinding Feature THE TOWN OF West Main Street AVON STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS Library & Rec Center Plaza - Lettuce Shed Plaza Awn West Main Street - View West l 4ilk ea�c Oaf Wu � s.miSF, ii w. �4 1 Nottingham Park Plaza Awn West Male Street - View East Eastern Gateway "'"w"' OF West Main Street AVONSTREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS Gateway Wayfnding Sign /— Deciduous Shade Tree Stone Paving -TypeA �— Nottingham Plaza Water Feature Steps into Park Turf Lawn 1 Stone Seat Wall Concrete Paving -Type A Concrete Paving -Type B Concrete Pavers -Type D Concrete Pavers -Type C Bike Racks — Gateway Wayfinding Sign Planter Pot -Type B Planter Pot -Type C Pedestrian Light Lake Avenue Street Treatment Stone Paving -Type A Nottingham Park Water feature Bench -Type B --� THE TOWN Of West Main Street AVONSTRE' 1 SCA IMPROVEMENTS Deciduous Tree Ornamental Tree Library & Rec Center An Feature Planter Pot -Type C Stone Bollard Tree Grace -Type B Concrete Pavers -Type C Concrete Pavers -Type D — Concrete Pavers -Type C Concrete Paving -Type C — Stone Bench in Terraced Lawn — Stone Paving -TypeA Concrete Pavers -Type C Concrete Pavers -Type D Concrete Paving -Type C Pedestrian Light Trash Receptacle Planter Pot -Type B Stone Ballard Stone Planter Curb THE TOWN OF I West Main Street AVON I STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS ti IN Bench -Type A Stone Paving -Type A Concrete Pavers -Type F Concrete Pavers -Type E OrnamentalTree Raised Pedestrian Crossing Concrete Planter Splash Strip Concrete Paving -Type A Trash Receptacle Festoon Lighting Decorative Column Seasons ! Sheraton Plaza Art Feature Movable Tables and Chairs E4 THE TOWN OF West Main Street AVON STREP F S C A P E E Decorative Column �` ` •- �,....� ' ` Deciduous Tree .r ' Stone Bollards Seasons - Sheraton Plaza Art Feature — - -- Festoon Lighting t f -- Planter Seat Wall 7 — Planter Pot -Type B ..r ti IN Bench -Type A Stone Paving -Type A Concrete Pavers -Type F Concrete Pavers -Type E OrnamentalTree Raised Pedestrian Crossing Concrete Planter Splash Strip Concrete Paving -Type A Trash Receptacle Festoon Lighting Decorative Column Seasons ! Sheraton Plaza Art Feature Movable Tables and Chairs E4 THE TOWN OF West Main Street AVON STREP F S C A P E 7 60 0 e Interpretive Art Panels Concrete Pavers -Type A Concrete Pavers -Type B Art Planter Seat Wall Trash Receptacle Planter Pot -Type B Planter Retaining Wall Lettuce Shed Focal PointAm Feature Adirondack Chairs – - OrnarrentalTree Bench -Type A �— Stone Bollards Deciduous Tree Concrete Paving -Type A Concrete Paving -Type C Concrete Paving -Type B Adirondack Chairs Lettuce Shed Foul Point Art Feature Stone Paving -Type A Concrete Pavers -Type C skrAnn � � MMI 4 M!I ry ✓•IUNN 14e Wq NIlW 1NlNl Rlj THE TOWN Of I West Main Street AVONI STREETSCA IMPROVEMENTS I Concrete Paving -Type C Concrete Paving -Type B -A Concrete Pavers -Type C _ Concrete Paving -Type A Planter Pot -Type B Bicycle Racks Concrete Paving -Type B Stone Bench Planting Bands THE TOWN OF AYO N Pedestrian Light Turf Lawn Gateway Wayfnding Sign Ornamental Tree Stone Bench Eastern Gateway -Art Feature Deciduous Shade Tree ;KOW 3 •N A , ,, ftft ,. Concrete Paving -Type B Planter Pot -Type B Concrete Pavers -Type D Concrete Pavers -Type A West Main Street STREETSCA; a ■ �t iG pn u ` stn n a t� as map mon Pedestrian Light Turf Lawn Gateway Wayfnding Sign Ornamental Tree Stone Bench Eastern Gateway -Art Feature Deciduous Shade Tree ;KOW 3 •N A , ,, ftft ,. Concrete Paving -Type B Planter Pot -Type B Concrete Pavers -Type D Concrete Pavers -Type A West Main Street STREETSCA; a The numbers identifying the pi materials picNred below correspond to both the site plan on this banner as weH as to the colored site plan banner, where applicable. Stone Paving - Type A M oiar slate ant n azhlar pxttem. Stone Paving - Type B Multi -odor sarvlaori cu[ in yenning bond pattern. Stone Paving - Type C Mdi--color PaWMY r rmdom co i, patten. Sam Concrete Paver- Canl:rele Paver- Concrete Paver - Type A Type B Type C "Avon RM Bli "Three Tone Br « "Ao n &.,dCi Twr8led Ve , w pavers T=ned Vere pacers canes pa. in nindsn in rardc uhiarpaztem. in random asNar pattern. pattern. Concrete Paver - Concrete Paver - Concrete Paver - Type D Type E Type F 'Mirecnta Ris`Turcded "AArnn Blend "Cobble "Mini Ris" Cabbie Vextian piersn rutlnn snres pavers in cri we pass n crt.nr asNar pane, patter, pstten Concrete Paving - Concrete Paving - Concrete Paring - Type A Type B Type C "lbrve Gdd'Colored NO Grande" coWnid "Carbde" Coloed concrete with hght concrete vnth sindsape crncri with sand• -•y brown finish. finish. Posh. Concrete Paving - Concrete Paving - Concrete Paving - Type D Type E Type F '1e .. Cdn d 'Con." Coin Star&rl grey conocse orcrete vmh sandsrepe ri w :int with ligf[ boom finch finch bro-yn fineh. rvornxcr++w ..._, IA`, THE TOWN Of West Main Street AVONSTREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS The numbers identifying the site fumishings pictured below correspond to both the site plan on this banner as well as to the colored site plan barvmr, where applicable. Bench - Type A Bench - Type B 'Arzatn' 13 f berch wrth by ea� bench w woad mat aM dw wood seat and olrre powdercoated frame paAmowed frame. Adrandock Chairs Spelak seating A LetWre Shed Lane Focal Pont h wAble Tabble; & QIaLa At Seasons Shmtan Plain - "Park Centre" cries, Tree Grate - Type A Trac Brute - ,ONO "Gast non. T�wB Iw „Flat Rainbow' BeY-prent Miesh Cast nn. Rawl With az y& ,. logo. Planter Pots - Types A -C Bicycle Rack "Rig' Sr mless Steel Newapaw flack 1�M1 11 8 ;' 4 Stoics Bogard Stone Phuder Curb Stone Veneer w m "Oklahami THE TOWN OF West Main Street MON STREETSL < 'R� Tenant Directory & Events Sign ! Pedestrian Directional Sign 4 Vehicular Directional Sign a Pedestrian Directional Sign K Pedestrian Pedestrian Sign Directional Sign with Clock s N �y N Avon Main Street Signage Family The signs represented below depia [he majority of the Avon Main Street Signage Farnily as outlined in the West Town Center investment Ran. Some, or all, of these signs wall appear within the Awn West Main Sb eet Streetscape Improvxocems project, based on need iu ll ll _ THE TOWN OF • West Main Street AVON STREETSCAPE :.,_- V'EMENTS Eastern Gateway Art Piece The Eastern Gateway will identify West Main Street with a grand presence and will be easily visible ii Avon Road. The gateway will set the tone of the street by utilizing sustainable and indigenous materials where possible. The piece will incorporate a variety of textures and materials malting it visually and tactually interesting from all angles , day and night. and in all seasons. THE TOWN Of Nottingham The Nottingham Plaza water feaure will be the iconic western gateway to Main Street while also serving as a playful gathenng space, overlook to the pad, and performance area. The water feature will incorporate materials from the Eastern Gateway, such as stone and metal, and provide a LLchanging series of water and lighting depending on the events and seasons. !� 45 a LibraryCorridor This installation will create a colorful, punctuated, multi -piece passageway for pedestrian traRc that is interesting in day. nit and all seasons. Based on whimsical references to Avon's stories, symbols and history, the art will use bright colors, variety of textures and approachable scale to attract children and adults. 4 Library Roundabout Capitalizing on the interplay between the Library and the name of the Town, this playful installation will juxtapose'A"'s depicted in a variety of typefaces and colors W form a tower strveiure. The _ thetower will act as the centerpiece to the library roundabout and the visual temonus to the Library & Rec Cerner Plaza pedestrian walk (5 Seasons / Sheraton Plaza Art Piece The Seasons / Sheraton Plaza art piece will provide the central focal point for the plaza. While primanly a horizontal piece, elements such as columns, boundary towers and festoon lighting will emphasize and enclose the piece. ra Lettuce Shed Lane Plaza Intended as an outdoor"limng =m;'this piece will act as both a focal pant along the street and as the "hearth" for the plaza space. This fire -based piece will refer m Avon's history as well as look to Avon's future by incorporating sustarable and indigenous materials where possible. Lettuce Shed Lane History Panels These Interpretive panels will be placed along the length of Lettuce Shed Lane pedestrian walk the armory condor used by v hors w Avon. The panels will illustrate Avon's history from niny times to modem day, providing nesidents and visitors a sense of context forAvan as a unique place. The numbers identifying the light fixtures pictured below correspond to both the lighting plan on this banner as well as to the colored site Night Lighting plan banner, where applicable. Step & Seat Wall Lighting Stone Bench & Wall Planting Lighting Ballard Uplights Art Wall Panels 'SnoW Light Beams Win vu,d cmopy opnon. Plaza Tree Uphghts Paving Marker Lights Festoon Lighting .lush Lighting Future f: nth coiaid I,Jued moral paces. Of Art Feature .Multi -Color Tree Lighting THE TOWN OE West Main Street AVONSTREL SCA .JVEMENTS Staff Report FINAL DESIGN PLAN c0 L O R A D O September 2, 2008 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date August 29, 2008 Project type Single Family Residence Legal description Lot 12, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision Zoning 2 Units — PUD Address 5712 Wildridge Road East Introduction The applicant, Ryan Sutter, has submitted a Final Design application for a single family residence with an attached accessory unit over the garage on Lot 12, Block 4 of the Wildridge Subdivision. The lot will be accessed off of Wildridge Road East and the proposed residence will measure approximately 6,370 sq. ft., inclusive of the garage area. The building is designed with gabled roofs with asphalt shingles and corten metal roofing and utilizes stone, wood shingles, vertical wood siding and horizontal log siding on the exterior walls. As proposed, the structure appears to contain two dwelling units, which is technically allowed per the zoning on the lot. The second residence is located above the garage and is called out on the plans as the Guest House. The Guest House is considered a second dwelling unit since it contains cooking facilities and is designed to be independent of the primary dwelling unit. The applicant is representing that this unit's interiors will only be roughed in during the construction of the residence and that it will be finished at a later date. However, since the applicant is applying for a single-family residence and given the regulations of the building code regarding proper structural separtation, Staff will require that the kitchen in the Guest House be removed to ensure that a single family residence is proposed. Included with this report are a vicinity map (Exhibit A), Color Board and Light fixture specification sheet (Exhibit B), and reduced plan sets with a site plan, floor plans, and elevations (Exhibit C). Review History In 2001, the owner of the property applied for and received approval for a PUD Amendment for the subject property. The PUD Amendment changed the zoning on the lot from a maximum density of one (1) dwelling unit to two (2) dwelling units. In 2006, a Final Design application was approved for an 8,400 square foot duplex residence. The approved plan had a similar site layout with the driveway access from the southern corner of the lot and the residence placed in the northern two-thirds (2/3) Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 12, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision — Sutter Residence Final Design September 2, 2008 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Page 2 of 8 AYON of the lot. The approved plan also used numerous engineered retaining walls throughout the site and had a limited landscaping plan. At the Commission's March 4, 2008 meeting, the Sketch Design review took place for this property during which several comments were made related to the following design issues: the dificullty of the site, the amount of retaining walls proposed, and the lack of natural landscaping. Design Review Considerations According to the Town of Avon Residential, Commercial. and Industrial Desian Review Guidelines, Section 7, the Commission shall consider the following items when reviewing the design of this project: 1. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other provisions of the Town of Avon Zoning Code. • Allowed use: The proposed residential use is permitted given the duplex - PUD zoning. • Density. The lot is zoned for a duplex residence and the single family density is appropriate. • Lot Coverage: Maximum site coverage allowed under the Wildridge PUD is fifty percent (50%). The project is in compliance with the PUD, proposing nineteen percent (19%) lot coverage. • . Setbacks: The setbacks for the property are typical for Wildridge with a twenty- five foot (26) wide front yard setback and ten foot (10') wide side yard building setbacks. The subject lot does not contain a rear yard setback since the side yard setbacks intersect at a point in the rear of the lot. Even though the building is within all required setbacks, an Improvement Location Certificate (ILC) will be required to document the exact location to ensure no encroachments occur. • Easements: A Utility and Drainage Easement of seven and one-half feet (7.5') in width borders both of the side property lines on the north and south, while a ten foot (10') wide Slope Maintenance, Drainage, and Snow Storage Easement borders the east side of the property. It is not advised to place landscaping within platted easements; however, it is the owners responsibility if this landscaping requires removal and replacement in the future. • Building Height: The proposed residence measures approximately thirty four feet and nine inches (34'-9") at its tallest point which complys with the zoning code's maximum height of thirty five feet (35'). Even though the building is within the maximum height allowed under zoning, an Improvement Location Certificate (ILC) will be required to document the exact location to ensure its compliance. • Grading/Drainage: All existing and proposed grades are indicated on the site plan. • Parking: This project, when viewed as a duplex residence, requires five (5) parking spaces (two (2) per unit under 2,500 sq. ft. / three (3) per unit over 2,500 sq. ft). As stated earlier in this report, the applicant will be required to remove the Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 12, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision — Sutter Residence Final Design mw September 2, 2008 Planning R Zoning Commission Meeting Page 3 of 8 AEON kitchen from the Guest House to comply with a single family residence design, which in turn will reduce the parking requirements by two (2) spaces. The result is a need for three (3) parking spaces and the applicant has proposed a total of four (4) parking spaces, two (2) interior and two (2) exterior spaces, which do meet the parking requirements. 2. The general conformance with Goals and Policies of the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan, and any sub -area plan which pertains. The project complies with the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan. 3. Whether adequate development rights exist for the proposed improvements. Adequate development rights exist on the property for a single family residence. 4. The Final Design plan is in general conformance with Sub -Sections A through D of the Residential. Commercial, and Industrial Desiqn Guidelines. A. Site Development: o Site Design: The Design Guidelines put emphasis on site layout design and state that structures should blend in with natural settings and limit the need for extensive site grading and slope retention. The site is steep and uphill that contains a platted non -developable area in the northern portion of the property and significant topographical change along the lower portion of the lot. This lot will require special consideration to the site design, grading and drainage, use of retaining walls, and treatment of exposed slopes. The applicant has provided a site plan that builds the proposed residence into the hill side. Due to the steepness of the lot, the applicant has proposed a large number of retaining walls that will all need to be engineered. Although the proposed residence doesn't step up the lot as the guidelines would suggest the applicant has proposed to pull the residence as far east as possible. The Guidelines state that all disturbed areas should be revegetated with native seed. The applicant intends to restore disturbed areas with vegetation as shown on the landscape plan and discussed later in this report. Staff recommends that the applicant use revegetation matting on all steep slopes to ensure vegetation growth. o Site Access: Access to the site is provided with a twelve foot (12') wide driveway from Wildridge Road East. The applicant is representing that the driveway meets the maximum grade requirements by stating a ten percent (10%) grade is used for a majority of the driveway. The balance of the driveway meets the four percent (4%) maximum for the first twenty feet (20') adjacent to the roadway and parking areas. Staff does have concerns about the drivway's ability to meet the four percent (4%) maximum grade adjacent to the roadway. Staff recommends that the site plan provide spot elevations to prove that the design meets the requirements. Staff also has concerns about the Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 12, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision — Sutter Residence Final Design September 2, 2008 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Page 4 of 8 MR driveway adjacent to the garage and the apparent drainage into the garage. Staff would recommend that the applicant revise the drawings to ensure that there is positive grading away from the garage. o Parking and Loading: The intent of the parking guidelines is to provide residents and guests with suitable parking locations that are also durable and functional. The parking requirements of this section are discussed above in the parking zoning requirements. The material used for the driveway is asphalt which is acceptable and it appears the applicant meets the parking requirements. o Site Grading: Due to the location of the proposed residence and the use of retaining walls, the amount of site grading is minimal. The guidelines do state the following: Where finished grades require retaining wall placement, a series of lower retaining walls with landscaped terraces is preferable to a high wall with an unbroken vertical face. The applicant is proposing to use all engineered retaining walls that contain little space for planting beds. Staff would recommend that the retaining walls on the west side of the driveway be stepped more to create a greater amount of planting areas inbetween the retaining walls. As stated earlier in this report, due to the steepness of the lot engineered retaining walls will be required for a majority of the necessary slope retention. Staff understands this hardship but feels that an alternative design to the site, through modifications to the retaining walls and landscaping plan, could result in a better aesthetic design. The applicant is proposing retaining walls that extend beyond the property line and into the public ROW. The guildines state that all grading work must be contained within the property boundaries. Staff recommends that the applicant revises their site plan to ensure that all retaining walls are fully within their property boundaries. o Drainage: The Guidelines have been generally met with regard to drainage as the drainage is mostly set away from the buildings and into the drainage easements. Staff does have concerns that the drainage from the western portion of the lot and its lack of adequate positive drainage away from the western portion of the structure. Staff recommends that the applicant revise the grading plan to ensure that there is proper drainage away form the western side of the structure. The Guidelines require that all drainage easments remain unobstructed. The applicant is not proposing any landscaping within the platted Drainage easements. Snow Removal and Storage: The project has a note designating the area to the north and east of the driveway as snow storage areas. Although the site plan does not contain shaded areas of snow storage, it appears that there is plenty of space for snow to be stored. The driveway contains an area to the east that is at least ten feet (10') in width and over one Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 12, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision — Sutter Residence Final Design�!! September 2, 2008 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Page 5 of 8 AYBN hundred and fifty feet (150) of length. Staff feels that this is adequate to meet the Snow Storage requirements of the Design Guidelines. B. Building Design: o Building Materials and Colors: A variety of quality building materials are proposed with this application including: Stone, wood shingles, vertical wood siding, and horizontal log siding. The applicant has proposed general colors for the wood siding, wood shingles, trim, and roofing materials (Exhibit B), but the applicant has also stated his desire to use reclaimed materials. The reclaimed materials could alter the final colors of the building materials, therefore Staff recommends that the applicant provide a physical color board to staff for final approval prior to issuance of a building permit. These proposed colors do meet the Design Guideline requirements and staff is of the opinion that they are acceptable with the condition listed above. o Exterior Walls, Roofs, and Architectural Interest. The building's massing is broken up with varying building materials, wall planes, roof elevations, and use of fenestration. The applicant has used a high quality of arichetecture to create an interesting composition. The building utilizes a large amount of stone as a base material with a mixture of vertical wood siding and wood shingles on the east and south building elevations. The north and west building elevations have minimal interest, but are acceptable due to the lack of viasbility of the home. The Design Guidelines don't specifically state that wood shingles are an allowed or disallowed exterior building material, but they do state that asphalt shingles and cements shingles are not allowed. The proposed residence does utilize asphalt shingles and cor-ten as roofing materials which are encouraged by the Design Guidelines. The proposal also includes the use of solar panel on a portion of the roof area. The Guidelines do not contemplate the use of solar panels, but staff feels that they are acceptable due to depictions on the elevations of flush mounted panels. o Outdoor Lighting: The applicant has proposed to use exterior lighting on the proposed residence (Exhibit B). Although the light fixture locations are not called out on the plans, the light fixture proposed does comply with our outdoor lighting ordinance. C. Landscaping: o Design Character: The design appears to generally comply with the intent of the Residential Landscaping Guidelines, but could be improved to help provide better screening for retaining walls. In terms of plantings, there are a total seven (7) Colorado Blue Spruce trees at a height of six feet (6), twenty four (24) Aspen trees varying from two inch (2") to three inch (Y) calipers, fifteen (15) Buckbrush shrubs, ten (10) Snowberry shrubs, 'eight (8) Alpine Current shrubs, six (6) Siberian Peashrubs, and eighteen (18) Big Sage shrubs. The applicant has provided a majority of the trees to the Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 12, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision — Sutter Residence Final Design � September 2, 2008 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Page 6 of 8 MON south of the proposed residence and staff feels that some of those planting could be moved to the east of the retaining walls to help provide a greater level of screening. The applincant has provided shrub planting in the beds created between the retaining walls. Staff would recommend that a more mature planting be used in those locations to help provide a more immediate screening for the retaining walls. According to the applicant, all trees would meet the minimum size requirements as prescribed by the Design Guidelines: 6' minimum height for evergreens, 2" minimum caliper for deciduous trees, and 5 gallon minimum for shrubs. The proposal appears to meet the Guidelines' requirements for landscaped area and irrigated area. o Irrigation/Watering: The applicant is not proposing any perminant irrigation and will only temporarly irrigate the planting beds to help ensure initial growth. It appears that the applicant has meet the requirements of this section of the Design Guidelines. o Retaining Walls: There are numerous retaining walls proposed with this site design. All of the retaining walls do not comply with the non - structurally designed retaining walls that are encouraged by the Design Guidelines. It appears that the applicant has provided a structurally designed retaining wall and staff will require that the designs be stamped by a Structural Enginneer and that the Engineer provide calculations to the Engineering Department prior to issuance of a building permit. The applicant is proposing to use a mixture of stone veneer retaining walls and boulder retaining wall which are both acceptable. The applicant has not committed to using a specific type of stone veneer and staff would recommend that the stone veneer on the retaining walls match the stone used on the proposed residence. As stated earlier in this report, Staff would recommend that the retaining walls, specifically those to the west of the driveway provide more stepping to create a greater amount of area for mature plantings. 5. The compatibility of proposed improvements with site topography, to minimize site disturbance, orient with slope, step building with slope, and minimize benching or other significant alteration of existing topography. The lot has a steep uphill slope that requires a good amount of slope retention. With that in mind, Staff is of the opinion that the proposed improvements do limit the amount of site disturbance. Staff does have one concern, the plans do not show limits of site disturbance fencing on the north, south, or east sides of the development. Staff recommends that the applicant revise the construction management plan to ensure that there is limits of site disturbance completely surrounding the proposed development. 6. The appearance of proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways, with respect to architectural style, massing, height, orientation to street, quality of materials, and colors. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 12, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision — Sutter Residence Final Design ,o. September 2, 2008 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Page 7 of 8 AVON The applicant has proposed high quality materials and earth tone colors that should make this project visually compatible with the surrounding environment. The property is adjacent to open space to the north and a developed lot to -the south. Staff feels that the proposed improvements are compatible with the surrounding area. 7. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired. No monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired with the proposed improvements. 8. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. The project is in general conformance with the Town's adopted goals and policies and is a use by right per the Wildridge Subdivision. Staff Recommendation Staff is recommending Tabling of this Final Design application for a single family residence on Lot 12, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision due to inconsistancies with sections A -D of the Residential Design Review Guidelines. If the Commission chooses a recommendation of Approval, Staff would recommend the following conditions be included: 1. The title block of all sheets be revised to use the proper Legal description of Lot 12, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision; 2. Sheets A-010 and A-012 be revised to remove the Stepped Boulder Retaining Wall note that points to the proposed residence; 3. The Construction Management Plan (Sheet A-012) be revised to ensure limits of disturbance fencing completely surrounding the proposed improvements; 4. The Floor Plans (Sheet A-102) be revised to remove the kitchen facilities from the Guest House; 5. Revise the Site Plan (Sheet A-011) to provide spot elevations for the driveway to ensure positive grading and drainage away from the garage and to ensure the maximum slope requirements are met; 6. Revise the Site Plan (Sheet A-011) to ensure all retaining walls are fully within the property boundaries; 7. The Landscaping Plan be revised to provide better screening for the retaining walls and more mature plantings; 8. The Landscaping Plan be revised to provide revegetation matting on all steep slopes to ensure growth of the revegetated areas; 9. All Retaining Walls over four feet (4) in height be revised to reflect a non- structural wall or a detail be added so that the design receives a stamped approval from a Colorado Licensed Professional Structural Engineer and that all required calculations be received and approved by the Town Engineer; 10.The applicant provide staff with physical samples of all colors for all materials, especially reclaimed materials prior to approval of any colors or materials; 11.The retaining walls to the west of the driveway be revised to provide more stepping and landscaping to better screen the walls; and Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 , Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 12, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision — Sutter Residence Final Design September 2, 2008 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Page 8 of 8pV0N 12. Except as otherwise modified by this approval, all material representations made by the applicant or applicant representatives in this application and in public hearings shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of approval. Recommended Motion 1. "1 move to table the Final Design application for a single family residence on Lot 12, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision to a following meeting, due to the inconsistancies between the application and section A -D of the Residential Design Review Guidelines." If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748-4023, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, J Barnes Planner I Exhibits: A. Vicinity Map B. Color Board and Light Fixture Specification Sheet C. Reduced Plan Sets Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 � 'rl 1 The exterior siding of the guest house (above the garage) will be as shown below with the trim being the same as on the main house. The window frames on this house will also be dark brown. The exterior lighting will be sconces as shown below. The Great Outdoors Wall Sconce by Minka Lavery. 8990 -61 -PL, Part #: 2324177. Width: 7.5, Height: 19.75", Projection: 12.25' zizz szz meal oo m nu oa SNOZIHOH lV8fll3311HOHV I Y µ U IM 1 \ E N�a319 � -r opeaoloo 'uony uo!S!n!pgnS 96plapl!M - Z L fol 21311ns visa X1'8 NV.QJ JOJ 03uap!SO�J MON y sn nv a 90 19119 LSI -.t 4N V*IJ O 0 OZ /I uL9ld nS a `o g m oa_ X O E�� \ V 1U O—N��_NN0000 OOOOOOOONNNN rri ' a r r r Q¢QQQQQ¢QQQ¢ V � l� OZS C2 V n n n z� N g m oa_ X O E�� \ V 1U O—N��_NN0000 OOOOOOOONNNN rri ' a r r r Q¢QQQQQ¢QQQ¢ /' r� /\�\�.,, `�` V (ZSOB p?'S„i„pO 11'I;ZIIZ%Og Od SNOZWOH lVNn1O311HO?JV es OpeJoloO 'uony uolSlnlpgnS ebpljpl!M - Z L lol 21311ns d1S12j18 NVAl l BOJ WuaplSO�f mON y o sn �tva 90/91/90 4N P -Old N bulb ugsuo) 0 �. _ ..•;I ..;/,'i i i�,_, 1-r.,l'. a �” � _ -�*YJ . 1 V F d Hs o sn �tva 90/91/90 4N P -Old N bulb ugsuo) 0 �. _ ..•;I ..;/,'i i i�,_, 1-r.,l'. a �” � _ -�*YJ . 1 J e - `UOhd - - ope�alo� uolslhlpQ�S a6p!aPl!M- ZG N ,�nl� Fav 311(15 ao� aoUap�sa� MaN�- — ` 1 � d // (j.1e jL l_f _____ ___ _ ___ __ __ __ _ __ _ __ ___�M.bt`l Zt OtB_i_;._; _Y__ __ _ _ /__-1__, d 90/91190 - ui 0 U) 0 0- 0 0� a. SNOZWOH IV2IMDKIH�a� OPP10100 i 'UOAV UOISIA1pqnS 96p!jpl!M - Z 6 101 �Mins ViSNiR NVA�J iI 101 GOUGPS8� MON V M ui Z < ogLL LU 9 P- z It U- qw- CIJ N "0-.t7 CO C? 0 z (S w 00<0 < g o 0 M z U- ww W 0 < o z o< M W LU a 't LL z w W W w z T z0 LL x F- Wo 0 LL w w 0 w W Z -j w OO 0 "t LL _ J -- .0-,Z - .0-.9 - ui,j Y 0 Y 8do<o a ozo LU M zo Q� O� Of cr 0 CLDU Z< < cr Of Wo <>Oz< 0 z W CO -J wz-j Stu wwo2ww F-- — LL z 0, W gzw 080co< 0 zo LL co it z L XLL w LL, 0 W 0 2 < CLO< Z W W -j U- 0 MI W Cif 0 :;z I 0 > Q z L) 0 00< M. WWW 0 an z 'm LL < 0 co 3:WW < < w 0 Z D� W .Lu >2 uj 0� w g (!) w zo�w t- r uj ly 0 om� < z 0 ca W LL w 0 X LU LO T— z 0 LLI U) z 0 C) W U) std V -4-A suoIJ995 Ilem WIUIOF� sag 191190 \7 3 U) W Q o m SNOZ180H i"nIO311"",v Op2J010o i i 'UOAV . uo!s!nlpgnS abpupl!M - Z l lol 21311ns visa V NVAl BOJ 90uapls@8 mON y 90/91/90 J UPIJ "J0 lanai . gMOI 'N'a�01d 0 Q 0 oa SNOZIHOH WWiD IHO21V Op2J0!0o I I `UOAV p«szzle,6, uo!s!n!pgns aBp!aPl!M - Zl 101 213ii s ` isi1 ji'R N`d�l J SOI aoUap!sa�{ MON y LJ 31'-6' 19 .6* l 12'- 0' t '(1' 0 4j 1L S1 S s C I ®® 111 ®® z l r -A n coru� ON VIOId 0 - o -- 54 ut?ld "J° 19^91 u!eW _ Q 90191190 —_ - v�;r,_, w+_:i1: y,r, w o: wn,o„i LixiLe xoa oa SNOZWOH IV8010311HONV e012 SL2 �pL6� I opeloloo , 'uony uoisinipgnS OBpupl!M - Zl jol �1311ns VISNi'R NVAl SOI OOuapisO�l MON y °N V*IJ WIJ JOOJ� lanai aaddn y o soe oo'senwo u'zua xoe oa SNOZ180H lv8nl3311H38V zz szz mmi r—I opeaoloo `uony uoisinipgnS 96pupl!M - Z[ jol 21311ns ` iSNI'8 NVAJ J JOI aouapisa�l MON y I -llT: H nN g fad suoIJen91I o — lquiplin� 15el ' ail -'°N Q 90191190 l0m C � � t0 O a m a ago i o „„„z.oaod SNOZNOHl"%3311HOW OpBJOI0D I I IUOAV eoasi<uis�„ �� uo!s!n!pgng 96piJpl!M - Z L lol 21311ns ViSNi V NVA1 l JOJ aouap!sa�l MaN y nl } °NV "d UOlqe^911 o buippno gSaM ? Vi°S 90191190 a _rn�n)v`d3�r-."I in.,J c.o. .ry,.: uvsA—:-r.,\J do J N J a y J a p C � IF— � °Im a (0 a C a I I F F I .0 .o -.se € � I � m nl } °NV "d UOlqe^911 o buippno gSaM ? Vi°S 90191190 a _rn�n)v`d3�r-."I in.,J c.o. .ry,.: uvsA—:-r.,\J SNOZIHOH WIORIHO"v opejoloo 'UOAV I U01SIAipqnS 96p!jpl!M - Z -N V*J jol S 2J311ns ViSNi V NVAJ BOJ 80u9l)!sa� mON V L 90191190 is ue oo sninoo ;a'nzuzxoe oe SN021iJOH lV2ff11�311H�aV OPBU0100 I 'UOny ., P4 S abpijpliM-Z61 l 21311ns `d1S12j1'8 NVM3 JOI aouaP!Sa-d MGN y — s1 �, 9A1g99dsa9d -'IN m 90191190 0