Loading...
PZC Minutes 04-05-2005Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes VO 1\ u COLORADO April 5, 2005 5:00 pm — 5:30 pm Commission Work Session I. Call to Order The meeting was called to order at 5:35 pm II. Roll Call All Commissioners were in attendance. III. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda Commissioners requested that Item B under Consent Agent be placed on the Regular Agenda for discussion. IV. Conflicts of Interest Commissioner Savage disclosed a conflict with Item B on the Consent Agenda, Final Design — Duplex, Property Location: Lot 68, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision /4223 Wildridge Road West, Applicant/Owner. Stephen Turner. Commissioner Evans revealed conflict with Item #10; Minor Project — Satellite Antennae, Property Location: Lot 3, Block 3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision /1060 W. BC Blvd; Item #12; Variance — Front Setback Encroachments, Property Location: Lot 22, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision /77 Metcalf Rd; and Item #13; Sketch Plan — Commercial Remodel, Property Location: Lot 22, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision /77 Metcalf Rd. V. Consent Agenda: A. Approval of the March 15th, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes Commissioner Karow motioned for approval of Item A and Commissioner Didier seconded the motion. All commissioners were in favor and the motion carried unanimously. VI. Comprehensive Plan Update — (Public Hearing) Description: The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the Land Use and Community Framework section of the draft plan. This section includes: Existing Land Use Pattern, Opportunity and Constraints, Future Land Use Plan, and Community Framework/Key Goals and Policies of the Plan. Eric Heidemann began by introducing Pat Dawe from RNL Design and continued with the presentation of the Staff Memo. PUBLIC HEARING OPENED Pat Dawe presented to the Commission background and comments on the critical need of vision to produce a Comprehensive Plan. He continued with his analysis of the maps, discussing historical opportunities, emphasis on public access, and the input of public comment. Lynn Morgan, 3755 Wildridge Road East, approached the podium and complimented the staff on the work to date performed. He mentioned the need of public use "pocket parks ", connection of Avon to Wildridge via bike lanes between the two areas, installing a road behind the Pet Center to access Metcalf by the sub station to avoid commercial traffic, and thought it was a great job so far. Dominic Mauriello, as a Wildridge resident, voiced from the podium that he appreciated the opportunity to participate. As a representative of Vail Resorts, he commented that the "Red House" wasn't a historical structure. As Barney 1204, LLC representative, Mr. Mauriello commented that his client was concerned with the area allocated for residential /low density and he read the statement in the Comp Plan along Nottingham Road, parallel to 1 -70. He felt that the Comp Plan should encourage and give incentive to rezone and up zone the area in order to upgrade the properties thus giving the area an opportunity to improve visually, financially and be rehabilitated. He continued with the character and road improvements of Nottingham Road should have curb and gutter, drainage underground, swales removed to provide an aesthetic value. Commissioner Evans began with Page 7 for comments by the commission. Page 8 comments, Page 9 comments, Map comments were brought up by Commissioner Didier on the Existing Land Use Map and the changes already implemented such as the school site issue. Commissioner Evans responded that the maps needed to demonstrate the agreement of land use and what does the Town really want the land uses to be and how does one get around it all. Eric Heidemann voiced that the comments and notations of change would be best voiced now so changes can be initiated. Commissioner Evans thought that identification of pocket parks and open space would be helpful on the maps and that Avon's neighbors should be identified on the maps along with their land uses well. George McCausey, representative of the Avon Center, questioned if it were appropriate to discuss Lot 61. Commissioner Evans responded that a future meeting would be better. Commissioner Evans mentioned the cultural heritage and historical significance does not reflect the direction of the Town. Commissioner Karow agreed along with Commissioner Didier that defining Avon as unique via its heritage hasn't been figured out. Commissioner Evans voiced the need in the Comp Plan for an alternate route out of Wildridge via June Creek road in the event of fire as a secondary access. Larry Brooks agreed that it should be included in the plan. As well, a preferred access to Bachelor Gulch by a lift Page 13, wish list. Commissioner Didier commented that the Forest Service lands by Metcalf Road should be identified for its potential use since there always exists the a probability of land swap. Eric Heidemann suggested that mapping work could address and present those parcels not identified by ownership. Page 15 and 16 are definitions. Page 17 and 18 are key roles and community framework plan. Larry Brooks, Town Manager, approached the podium and questioned Planning Area M. Mr. Brooks commented that consideration should be given to access modes to parcels such as directing commercial vehicles through residential areas. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED B. Final Design — Duplex (Item originally on Consent Agenda) Property Location: Lot 68, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision /4223 Wildridge Road West Applicant/Owner. Stephen Turner Description: The applicant is proposing a duplex on this 5.24 -acre property. The lot is a steep downhill lot on Wildridge Road West and faces the June Creek Drainage on the western border of the Wildridge PUD. As proposed, the property would be accessed through an access easement on the developed property to the south (Lot 69). Building materials include stone, timber, and stucco. The sketch design was reviewed at the Commission's March 1, 2005 meeting. Matt Pielsticker presented the Staff Report to the Commission. Bernie Weber, project contractor, approached the podium to respond to commissioner concerns. He questioned the drainage issues and Mr. Pielsticker commented that the drainage needs to remain on Lot 68 and it is not to impact Lot 69. Commissioner Struve questioned the exercise room as a potential lock off. Commissioner Smith agreed with Commissioner Struve. Commissioner Karow was concerned with the appearance of the potential lock off but voiced that it conforms to Town Code. Commissioner Evans commented on several windows being off center from the exterior viewpoint and suggested centering would give better rhythm to home. Steve Turner, owner, questioned nanny quarters and the design review guidelines. Commissioner Karow moved to approve the Final Design — Duplex, Property Location: Lot 68, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision /4223 Wildridge Road West, subject to staff's approval conditions. Commissioner Didier seconded the motion. All commissioners were in favor and the motion passed unanimously. VII. Sign Design — Pizza Hut Property Location: Lot 67/68, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision /20 Nottingham Road Applicant. Tom Hronek, Sign Safari Description: The applicant, Tom Hronek of Sign Safari, is proposing two signs to replace the existing two building mounted Pizza Hut signs. The signs measure approximately 45 square feet (35.56" x 179.84 ") each and would be interior lit with fluorescents. Sign construction consists of polycarbonate faces and silk- screened graphics. Both proposed signs would be the same size and in the same locations as the existing signage. Matt Pielsticker presented the staff report and commented that the application was for two signs to be constructed, one on the north side and the other on the south side. A representative for Pizza Hut voiced her manager's opinion that additional lighting by the sign on the north side of the building would deter negative behavior in the parking lot. Commissioner Didier thought the sign was too large; Commissioner Karow and Commissioner Smith agreed with staff recommendations. Commissioner Struve and Commissioner Savage, Commissioner Evans supported staff recommendation. Commissioner Evans continued that there are alternative methods to increase lighting in the parking lot and questioned the sign code's allowance standards and thought they may bee too much. Commissioner Smith motioned for approval of Item VII, Sign Design — Pizza Hut, Property Location: Lot 67/68, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision /20 Nottingham Rd, Applicant. Dave Betts, Store Manager, with staff recommendations. Commissioner Karow seconded and the motioned carried unanimously. VIII. Sketch Design —13 Residential Units Property Location: Lot 12, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision /540 Beaver Creek Blvd. Applicant/Owner. Davis Partnership Architects /Daniel Ritsch Description: The applicant, Davis Partnership Architects, is proposing a 13 unit residential project on this lot. The proposed materials include a combination of stone veneer and wood siding with a maximum building height of 60' and maximum lot coverage of approximately 41%. The subject property measures approximately .69 acres and is currently undeveloped. Eric Heidemann presented the Staff Report. Commissioner Didier commented on the lot size and Mr. Heidemann commented that this lot was grandfathered in. Scott Nevin approached the podium to comment on staff's concern with the project and request direction on the split building view. Commissioner Evans questioned Commissioner Savage as an appraiser regarding the financial impact of this project. He continued that the issue is not multi family but multi structure. The Commission made a determination that the duplex building met the intent of the RHD Zoning category. Commissioner Struve approved the project; Commissioner Smith wanted to know from the owner why two structures were warranted. Mr. Ritsch felt it adds to the view corridor and provided more windows to the dwellers. Commissioner Karow queried the maximum height of 60 ft; the project is 54 feet in height. Commissioner Karow was concerned with the massing of the project and commented that the two structures worked. Commissioner Didier saw no problem with multiple units, seemed big, but voiced that future redevelopment in the area might consist of similar structure design. Commissioner Evans felt the two footprints were a good solution to the site but voiced concerned with the massing in the neighborhood. IX. Minor Project — Satellite Dishes Property Location: Lot 18/19, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision /281 Metcalf Applicant. Bill Varecha Description: William Varecha is proposing the installation of four (4) satellite dishes in the `common area' of the Metcalf Commercial Park property. The Commercial and Industrial Design Guidelines have specific requirements for all satellite dishes. The Town has received a letter from the property manager granting approval of the dishes by the owners association. Matt Pielsticker presented the Staff Report. William Varecha, applicant, approached the podium. He began with defining the dish use for broadcasting and receiving, and that they are situated in a location, staggered in placement, for ease of maintenance and signal reception. Mr. Varecha continued that he would be willing to move as far south as possible on the site if required. Commissioner Didier commented on the painting of the dishes and Mr. Varecha commented that they were available in a variety of colors but white was most common. Mr. Varecha circulated some photographs taken of the area and commented on the other dishes in the vicinity. Commissioner Didier suggested that pine trees would provide greater coverage and Mr. Varecha responded that there is an easement and a retaining wall and the width of pine trees might inhibit access. Commissioner Karow agreed with Commissioner Didier and staff's recommendation. Commissioner Evans suggested the movement southward was warranted and pine trees were appropriate, and that a compliance deposit for landscaping would be appropriate. Commissioner Savage commented that the residents of Wildridge would appreciate the secluded view of the dishes. Commissioner Karow moved to approve Item IX, Minor Project — Satellite Dishes, Property Location: Lot 18/19, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision /281 Metcalf, with the following conditions that the dishes be moved as fair south as possible, trees will be planted no later than 30 days following installation of dishes, painted to match adjacent vegetation, trees will consist of a minimum of 12 with at least 50% pine, and a bond of 125% of the project. Commissioner Struve seconded the motion and all commissioners were in favor. X. Minor Project — Satellite Antennae Property Location: Lot 3, Block 3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision /1060 W. BC Blvd Applicant. Jim Clancy — Vail Resorts Description: Jim Clancy is proposing the installation of three rooftop communication devices on the Westgate Building including: one pole with two directional transmit antennas, one pole with receiving antenna, and one pole with a web camera pointed towards the mountain. The new equipment would accommodate the new 2nd story tenant's (TV8) needs for transmitting information. The design guidelines have specific requirements for all antennas and satellite dishes. Matt Pielsticker presented to the Commission the Staff Report. Dominic Mauriello, applicant representative for TV8 and Vail Resorts, approached the podium for comment and questions. He voiced the ideal location, ease of signals via line of sight and continued by distributing photos to the commission and reviewing each. He continued that these antennae could be painted to mask their appearance and height will be determined by the probability of interference of the signal. Commissioner Savage questioned how were all the presented antennae installed. Response was that it occurred due to the lack of criteria in the guidelines prior to 2001. Commissioner Struve commented that it should be not over four feet tall and on the north side of the parapet. Commissioner Smith concurred with Commissioner Struve. Mike Olson, TV8 engineer, responded with the specs of the antennae and how it receives signals. Commissioner Karow voiced that it must be screened per guidelines. Mr. Varecha commented on the accuracy of the information being that TV8 is not the owners of the antennae and Commissioner Karow voiced that the application is for the design review of the antennae and the ownership of such was not under review. Commissioner Didier moved to approve Item X, Minor Project — Satellite Antennae, Property Location: Lot 3, Block 3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision /1060 W. BC Blvd, with conditions of painting the antennae, placement so that they can not be seen from highway 6 and if they are seen, will be immediately removed, that it does not exceed 4 feet in height, and it can not be seen from the viewpoint as demonstrated on page 8 of the applicant's provided picture booklet. Commissioner Struve seconded the motion and all commissioners were in favor. XI. Sketch Design — Duplex Property Location: Lot 96, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision /2360 Old Trail Applicant/Owner. Philip Matsen Description: The applicant is proposing a duplex on a .46 -acre property. The lot is uphill and accessed off of Old Trail Road. All bordering properties are developed or currently under construction. This application proposes two units, both measuring approximately 2,800 square feet. Building materials for this duplex include: stucco body, horizontal and vertical board on batten siding, stone base, and asphalt shingles. Matt Pielsticker presented the Staff Report. Philip Matsen, applicant, approached the podium to address commissioner inquiry. He voiced that the concerns of staff would be addressed in final design. Commissioner Didier began commissioner review by questioning the popouts on the front elevation and its grounding. Commissioner Karow commented that these plans were similar to 4 other units in Wildridge, voiced that the backside seemed a mirror image, and that landscaping could address the issue. Commissioner Smith stated that the mirror image in the rear needs to be addressed. Commissioner Struve expressed that the south entrance needed to be stronger and questioned the use of stucco. Mr. Matsen replied that stucco was more durable and the cedar was getting torn up. Commissioner Savage suggested moving the windows and changing their sizes. XII. Variance — Front Setback Encroachments — Public Hearing Property Location: Lot 22, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision /77 Metcalf Rd Applicant. Evans Chaffee Construction Description: Evans Chaffee Construction Group Inc. is requesting a Variance from the minimum 25' setback requirement to allow for the encroachment of the building structure (enclosed stairway and portion of proposed 3rd story addition). A portion of the structure (stairs) currently encroaches into the 25' setback; however, the structure is considered legal non - conforming as it was built prior to the adoption of the zoning code. The applicant's proposal is to enclose the stairs and add a 3`d story to the building, which will also encroach into the 25' setback. The encroachment would place the building approximately 17' from the front property line. Eric Heidemann presented the Staff Report. All commissioners agreed with the staff report. No public comment was offered. OPEN PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED PUBLIC HEARING Commissioner Didier motioned for approval of Item XII, Variance — Front Setback Encroachments Property Location: Lot 22, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, 77 Metcalf Road Applicant: Evans Chaffee Construction. Commissioner Smith seconded. The motion passed unanimously. XIII. Sketch Plan — Commercial Remodel Property Location: Lot 22, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision /77 Metcalf Rd Applicant: Evans Chaffee Construction Description: In conjunction with a Variance application for front yard setback encroachments, the applicant is proposing a sketch design plan for a complete remodel of the exterior of the building. The remodel is extensive and includes the addition of another floor to the building making the building 3 stories in height. The existing stairwell on the east elevation would be enclosed with corrugated metal siding and the exterior of the building would take on a new look with new materials including: lap siding, cementitious siding, and cedar timbers. Matt Pielsticker presented the Staff Report. Michelle Evans approached the podium to comment on staff's concerns. She mentioned that the gable roof would dump snow to the rear where the Montessori School playground is located and it would drain snow to the front and could be dangerous. Commissioner Didier questioned the second access to the site and comment was made that delivery would be easier. Commissioner Smith commented that the building had a better appearance. XIV. Zoning Code Amendments — (Public Hearing) Applicant. Town of Avon — Community Development Description: The proposed ordinance would add a public benefit review criteria for all rezoning, Special Review Use (SRU), Planned Unit Development (PUD), and Variance applications. Additionally, the ordinance would repeal and re -enact several supplemental regulations from the Zoning chapter of the Municipal Code. Eric Heidemann presented the Staff Memo to the Commissioners. OPEN PUBLIC HEARING Dominic Mauriello approached the podium to voice his concern regarding the setback. He suggested rewording of the term `public benefit' as it is too vague and should be dealt with in the PUD process. He suggested that staff should attempt to define "public benefit' so there would be no question in determining compliance. He continued with opening a discussion on the water feature issue. CLOSED PUBLIC HEARING Commissioner Evans motioned for approval of the Zoning Amendments subject to removal of the "public benefit" criteria from the variance, SRU, and general rezoning applications. Commissioner Didier seconded the motion. All commissioners were in favor and it passed unanimously. XV. Amendments to the Town of Avon Residential Commercial, and Industrial Design Review Guidelines — (Public Hearing) Applicant: Town of Avon — Community Development Description: The proposed resolution would amend the residential fencing requirements as well as many of the Commercial and Industrial Site Design and Building Design requirements (i.e. site access, building height, building materials and colors, roofs, etc). The proposed amendments would also add review criteria for all Commercial and Industrial design applications including 'building massing' and 'pedestrian frontages.' The proposed amendments were developed primarily by the Community Development Committee. Eric Heidemann discussed the staff memo with the commission and advised that it will be presented at the next Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. There was no public comment. OPEN PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED PUBLIC HEARING Commissioner Smith made motion to accept the Amendments as presented to the Town of Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Design Review Guidelines with two modifications to the Fencing and Screening requirements; 1) Item #2 will state that the split rail design will have no more than 3 horizontal rails, and; 2) sub -line #4 should read 'areas enclosed by fencing can be no more than 2,000 square feet'. Commissioner Savage seconded the motion and the motion passed unanimously. Adjourn Commissioner Evans motioned to adjourn; Commissioner Smith seconded the motion. The meeting was adjourned at 9:50 pm. Respectfully submitted, Ruth Weiss Recording Secretary APPROVED: Chris Evans Chairman Terry Smith Secretary