Loading...
PZC Packet 012015WA Avon COLORADO Call to Order- 5:0013m Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda Tuesday, January zo, 2015 Avon Municipal Building - One Lake Street COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT- 2ND FLOOR Meetings are Open to the Public- II. ublic - II. Roll Call III. Additions & Amendments to the Agenda IV. Conflicts of Interest V. PUBLIC HEARING: Case #PUD14007 Property Location: Lot 38 and Lot 39, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision Property Address: 5032 & 5040 Wildridge Road East Zoning: PUD (Wildridge) Applicant: Bobby Ladd, RAL Architects Owner: Wildridge Lots, LLC Description: PUD Amendment to change allowed building type and replat the parcels. VI. UPDATE: Case #MJR14005 - Major Development Plan & Design Review Property Location: Tract G, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Property Address: 1 Lake Street Zoning: Park Applicant: Town of Avon Owner: Town of Avon Description: Update on Nottingham Pavilion revisions made through value engineering. VII. UPDATE: Minor Development Plan & Design Review Property Location: Avon Road Public Right of Way Property Address: Roundabout #4 Zoning: ROW Applicant: Town of Avon Owner: Town of Avon Description: Modifications to Avon Road roundabout #4 related to the 2015 AWSC display. PZC will decide whether removing "Lasso" sculpture is necessary. VIII. Meeting Minutes Approval • Meeting Minutes from January 6, 2015 X. Staff Approvals • 3od Temp Use Permit approved for Volvo Vehicle Display at the Westin Plaza XI. Other Business • PZC Vacancy XII. Adjourn Agenda posted on January 16, 2014 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: -Avon Municipal Building -Avon Recreation Center -Avon Public Library -Town of Avon Website www.avon.org - Please call 970-748-4030 for Directions ,A,,. Staff Report -Minor PUD Amendment avon January 20, 2015 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting COLORADO Report date January 20, 2015 Project type Case #PUD14007 - Minor PUD Amendment Legal description Lot 38 & 39, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision Zoning PUD Address 5032 & 5040 Wildridge Road East Prepared By Brian Garner, Town Planner Introduction Bobby Ladd with RAL Architects, Inc., the Applicant, representing Wildridge Lots, LLC, the Property Owner, is requesting a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment (the Application) to modify the allowed building type for Lots 38 & 39, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision (the Property). The current lot entitlements are as follows: Lot 38: Two (2) total dwelling units in the form of one (1) single -family -detached structure or one (1) duplex structure Lo" -9: Four (4) total dwelling units in the form of one (1) fourplex or two (2) duplex structures. The Application is requesting the ability to amend the zoning to re -subdivide the Property to develop a total of six (6) single -family -detached structures. No change to the entitled density is requested; only a change to the allowed building type. As required by the Avon Development Code, the application is being processed as a Minor PUD Amendment. Attached to this report are a Vicinity Map and the Application materials. Process Minor PUD Amendment Process This application is processed under §7.16.o6o(h), Amendments to a Final PUD, AMC. Subsection (1)(ii), sets forth criteria for a Minor Amendment, while subsection (2)(ii) sets forth the review procedures for the same process. The application, as submitted, meets the criteria for a Minor Amendment: A. The PUD amendment does not increase density, increase the amount of nonresidential land use or significantly alter any approved building scale and mass of development. B. The PUD amendment does not change the character of the development and maintains the intent and integrity of the PUD. C. The PUD amendment does not result in a net decrease in the amount of open space or result in a change in character of any of the open space proposed within the PUD. Public Notification In compliance with the Public Hearing and noticing requirements, a mailed notice was provided to all property owners within 300' of the property. Additionally, a notice was published in the January 20, 2015 PZC Meeting — 5032 & 5040 Wildridge Road East - PUD Amendment Vail Daily newspaper on January 9, 2015. Another set of public notification is required prior to a Town Council hearing. Public Hearings The January 20, 2015 meeting completes the public hearing requirement with the PZC. As noted, the Council will make the final decision on this Application through a Resolution after holding one more public hearing. Proposed PUD Amendment The Property is currently undeveloped, zoned PUD and is included in the Wildridge Subdivision. The Wildridge Subdivision and PUD Plat contains a Land Use Summary table indicating the number of units entitled for each individual lot as shown in Exhibit i below. Highlighted are the subject properties with their respective entitlements. Exhibit i - Wildridge Subdivision and PUD Land Use Summary The Application includes a narrative, response to the mandatory review criteria, and preliminary site and building design plans showing the proposed development scenario. Conceptual Lot Split Plan: As demonstrated in the attached conceptual lot split plan, this Application is requesting to create six (6) separate lots of record that each would be permitted one (1) single -family -detached structure. January 20, 2015 PZC Meeting - 5032 & 5040 Wildridge Road East - PUD Amendment LM USE ILDM6UXX k } UN to UNITS urT L-46 2 UNIT: "CH �1� LCT 2 E UNITS LOT 47 1 UNIT LOT 3. 4 4 UNITS EACH LOT 40-59 I UNITS Fi" LOT 5-a 6 UNITS EACH 4UY 60 1 UNIT WAY LM li'-11 l "ITS EACH LW 61-71 7 UNITS SACH 57RI LOT 12 2 UNITS S1W LOT 13 DELMDALaT 4 HAVE WT It DELETED 14T 1-11-11 2 UNITS EACH TO I LOST 13 A UNITS LM 12 1 U111T A3 � LOT 16 3 UNITS LO3 134 14 2 UNITS EACH UITI LOT 17-1d 4 UNITS EACH LM 13 1 INIT LOT L9-75 2 UNITS DCII IAT 15-226 2 UMIIS LACK OT 74 6 UNITS Ln 2i-32 MOMO LOT 77 4 VAI T3 LOT 33-38 2 UNITS FACK Lot 79-74 6 UNITS MH LOT 39 a UNITS(: 9 WLEXES 44 1 FQ WL") LOT W99 4 UNITS EACH LOT 40. 41 2 UNITS PACK LM W100 2 UNITS EACH LfT1' 4.1,41 4 UNITS EACH LOC 101-102 4 UNITS "CH Wr 44-34 2 UNITS EACK Lot 1a3 -11G 2 UNITS FACH LC! is 3 UNITS LDC 111 1 UNITS EAT 56-63 2 MTS EAMi In 112-116 1 UNIT 9WK Im 64 4 UNITS kr I= 63-03 2 UKITS EACH BL=2 KM 84.94 3 UI4ITS LACK THI! Lei--- 4 KNITS EACH 'Wr 91 DELETI',D A1i1) LOT 4-12 2 CHITS EACH LOT 13 4 UNITS 1 Wa 5 IIhP WT 14 6 kN1TS UF—)-- 4 UNITS = 1516 2 UNIT! EACIS LOT 2,6.8 6 UNITS LACK DRAti IAT 17-18 4 UHITI SACH LAT 30 3 ITIeITS LACK LOT 19-24 2 U?IIT0 EACH L3T 4 3 UNITS UM Z5 4 DNITS LOT 7.10 10 UNITS EACH LOT 26-42 2 UNITS RACM LOT 9 6 UNITS LOT 43-46 4 UNITS LECH LOT L1 12 UNITS LOT 47-56 I MT1 3ACR IUCT A i I TRXU X. P. Q. L OFINSPACKMA1RUVAMSS i44T1 TRACT 61IGHT GIOMECIAL (4 APAIMEENTS) I' TRACT C.O IrAu 2• TRACT 9 ORAINAGC, ACCL55 ANG UTILITY The Application includes a narrative, response to the mandatory review criteria, and preliminary site and building design plans showing the proposed development scenario. Conceptual Lot Split Plan: As demonstrated in the attached conceptual lot split plan, this Application is requesting to create six (6) separate lots of record that each would be permitted one (1) single -family -detached structure. January 20, 2015 PZC Meeting - 5032 & 5040 Wildridge Road East - PUD Amendment The lot split plan also incorporates a deeded open space tract of 1.07 acre that would be commonly held by the six residential properties and maintained under the covenants and restrictions. Approval of this request would supersede the existing entitlement of a duplex and a fourplex on the respective lots. The Conceptual Lot Split Plan also demonstrates: • Proposed Lots 38A -38F and respective lot sizes • Proposed Open Space Tract of 1.07 acres • Existing easements for slope maintenance, drainage and snow storage • Existing platted utility and drainage easement • Proposed new utility and drainage easements • Proposed building setbacks retaining the existing Wildridge standards • Proposed platted "No Build" areas • The primary platted Access, Utility & Drainage Easement • Maximum building heights of 35 -feet Conceptual Site Plan: The applicant has provided a proposed site plan that demonstrates: • The proposed siting of the six home footprints (conceptual siting) • Proposed approximated square footage of each home footprint • Approximate location of retaining walls • Relationship of primary access drive to lots and homes • Fire truck/emergency response vehicle turnaround areas Next Steps if PZC Recommends Approval: • PZC recommendation and application presented to Town Council • If the application is approved by Council: o Major Subdivision review and approval by PZC and Town Council o Major Development Plan with Design Review for each new home proposed (PZC review and approval) o Building Permit review and approval (administrative) Staff Analysis Staff worked closely with the applicant to propose a project that meets the applicable review criteria, meets the intent of the Development Code and the Comprehensive Plan and to mitigate impact to adjacent properties. The proposal to allow six separate single -family - detached structures in lieu of the entitled duplex and fourplex (or two duplexes) does not change the density and will have an overall positive effect on the mass and scale of the developed property. By separating the potential structural massing, the visual impact of the developed site is minimized revealing increased building articulation, increased light and air between units, and decreased impact to wildlife migration. After reviewing the PUD review criteria below, Staff finds the Application is in conformance with the purpose of the Development Code, review criteria, and any potentially negative impact to neighboring properties has been mitigated to the fullest extent. The development January 20, 2015 PZC Meeting — 5032 & 5040 Wildridge Road East - PUD Amendment 3 pattern in this portion of Wildridge is a mix of duplex and single -family -detached homes (predominantly duplex structures); the proposed Application will help provide variety in building forms and create a more diverse development pattern. PUD Review Criteria Pursuant to §7.16.o6o(e)(4), Review Criteria, AMC, the PZC shall consider the following criteria when forming the basis of a recommendation: (i) The PUD addresses a unique situation, confers a substantial benefit to the Town, and/or incorporates creative site design such that it achieves the purposes of this Development Code and represents an improvement in quality over what could have been accomplished through strict application of the otherwise applicable district or development standards. Such improvements in quality may include, but are not limited to: improvements in open space provision and access; environmental protection; tree/vegetation preservation; efficient provision of streets, roads, and other utilities and services; or increased choice of living and housing environments. Staff Response: The stated purposes of §7.04, Development Code, AMC, and §7.16.o6o, PUD, AMC, includes statements regarding the implementation of the Comprehensive Plan; regulating intensity of use; avoiding increased demands on public services and facilities; and providing for compatibility with the surrounding area, among other statements. The proposed amendment does not increase demands on public services, and provides compatible building layouts with the surrounding area. It should be noted that all other applicable development standards (parking, design standards, access requirements) would remain intact. Additionally, the application proposes deeded open space and non -buildable area representing nearly half of the total lot area. (ii) The PUD rezoning will promote the public health, safety, and general welfare; Staff Response: The Application will promote the public health, safety and welfare by separating the structures and allowing more light and air between dwelling units which confer additional benefits to the surrounding community and for wildlife migration across the site. . (iii) The PUD rezoning is consistent with the Avon Comprehensive Plan, the purposes of this Development Code, and the eligibility criteria outlined in § A6.o6o(b); Staff Response: The proposed PUD amendment is part of an established PUD, and is therefore not subject to the eligibility criteria or Public Benefit requirements outlined in §7.16.o6o(b). Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan is required and analysis is provided below. January 20, 2015 PZC Meeting — 5032 & 5040 Wildridge Road East - PUD Amendment 4 The Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan includes this property within District 24: Wildridge Residential District. The planning principals specific to this property include the following: • Site buildings of varying sizes along the street to maximize sun exposure, protect views, be compatible with existing surrounding development, and break up building bulk. The Wildridge District planning principles contemplate enhancing and promoting open space connectivity. Approval of this Application would result in an additional deeded open space tract, improved building massing and maximized sun exposure. (iv) Facilities and services (including roads and transportation, water, gas, electric, police and fire protection, and sewage and waste disposal, as applicable) will be available to serve the subject property while maintaining adequate levels of service to existing development; Staff Response: This PUD amendment does not change the current entitlement of six total residential units; therefore the existing services can adequately serve the property. The application has been provided to Eagle River Water and Sanitation District as well as Eagle River Fire Protection District for review and no concerns were raised by these agencies. Additionally, a single curb cut from Wildridge Road East is proposed thereby reducing the Town's maintenance requirements. (v) Compared to the underlying zoning, the PUD rezoning is not likely to result in significant adverse impacts upon the natural environment, including air, water, noise, storm water management, wildlife, and vegetation, or such impacts will be substantially mitigated, Staff Response: The proposed PUD amendment should further mitigate impacts to the natural environment, wildlife, vegetation, and air beyond the current entitlement since the structural massing will be minimized and dispersed. Additionally, storm water management is improved with more opportunities for storm water runoff between the buildings. (vi) Compared to the underlying zoning, the PUD rezoning is not likely to result in significant adverse impacts upon other property in the vicinity of the subject tract; and Staff Response: Approval of the PUD amendment would not result in significant adverse impacts upon other property in the vicinity as the proposed PUD Amendment maintains the existing entitled density, and increases the building setbacks and utility/drainage easements. (vii) Future uses on the subject tract will be compatible in scale with uses or potential future uses on other properties in the vicinity of the subject tract. Staff Response: Single -family -detached residential use is compatible in scale with current and potential uses on other properties in the vicinity of the Property. January 20, 2015 PZC Meeting — 5032 & 5040 Wildridge Road East - PUD Amendment 5 Staff Recommendation Staff requests that the PZC conduct a public hearing, consider public comments, and direct Staff to prepare a formal Findings of Fact, Record of Decision, and Recommendation to Council pursuant to Section 7.16.020(f)(3), Findings. Recommended Motion: I move to recommend Town Council approval of Case #PUD14007, an application for a Minor PUD Amendment for Lot 38 and 39, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision together with the findings of fact. The Following Findings May be Applied Should the PZC Approve the Application 1. The PUD amendment does not increase density, increase the amount of nonresidential land use or significantly alter any approved building scale and mass of the development. 2. The PUD amendment does not change the character of the development and maintains the intent and integrity of the PUD. 3. The PUD amendment does not result in a net decrease in the amount of open space or result in a change in character of any of the open space proposed within the PUD. 4. The application was evaluated pursuant to Section 7.16.o6o(e)(4), Review Criteria, AMC, and found to be in compliance with the mandatory review criteria. Attachments A: Vicinity Map B: Application Materials January 20, 2015 PZC Meeting — 5032 & 5040 Wildridge Road East - PUD Amendment 5032 & 5040 Wildridge Road East r -- 0 z G) C: Z Z This map was pmdunedbythe Community Development Department. Useoithismap Feet should ba iorgeneralpurposes only Tb—fAvondoesnof—httha Property Boundaries accuracy of the data contained herein. Created by C.—hily Development Department - ] 180 360 Wildridge Road East PUD PUD Amendment Lots 38 and 39 Block 4 Wildridge Subdivision Town of Avon, Colorado December 16, 2014 r41fects, inc Irrliarg a P'Innnir r InI"rims I;ry;dn �a a a A r PIN.' ` Pt 0125 ��250 375 feet Wildridge Rd f Introduction Lots 38 and 39 sit on the north side of Wildridge Road East soon after the four way intersection that signifies the split of Wildridge Road East and West. Lot 38 is the western portion of the proposed PUD and is approximately 1.02 acres. Lot 39 is the easter portion of the proposed PUD and is approximately 2.463 acres and abuts Town of Avon property Tract O, including an encroachment from the building located upon it. The properties are very steep with extremely limiting grades and building siting areas. There are small pockets of manageable grades and slopes mostly situated on the upper and western portion of the lots. The areas of the lots that abut Wildridge Road East are extremely steep and limiting for site access, with there in reality being only one reasonable area for site access on the far Eastern edge of Lot 39. The proposed PUD amendment would vacate the current two (2) platted lots, currently zoned for 6 total units in duplexes and fourplexes, and create seven (7) new lots. All of the new lots would be governed under Covenants and Restrictions written specifically for this PUD amendment. Six (6) of the parcels would be zoned for one (1) single family residence on each property and the seventh parcel would be deeded as open space and commonly held by the six residential properties and maintained under the Covenants and Restrictions. With the singular access point, the lots would all be accessed and served by a single roadway that would be created across access easements platted onto each lot. The roadway would be designed to accommodate two way traffic and meet the requirements of the ERFPD for fire truck access, including a turnaround area at the end of the roadway for fire truck maneuvering. All of the existing easements and setbacks along the properties would be maintained with the exception of the easements and setbacks along the vacated lot line between Lots 38 and 39. Consequently, all of the new proposed lots will be platted with the same blanket easements and setbacks along the new property lines as defined on the recorded Wildridge plat document. The steep topography across the subject properties forces the need for grading and retaining walls to construct the proposed improvements. The retaining walls would be necessary under the currently approved development standards and by splitting the units into smaller masses the opportunity to integrate the structure design into the site is greatly improved allowing the buildings to work with the topography to decrease the magnitude of the necessary retaining walls while affording increased opportunity to mitigate their impact through landscaping, terracing, and building siting. In addition the singular access point takes advantage of the only truly accessible portion of the property along Wildridge Road East and consolidates the retaining and grading into one access road versus spreading it out across the subject properties in multiple accesses and intersections. TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY LOT R38'ID BLOCK 4 WILD TC'N HGE TOWN OG A EAGLE COUNTY, COLORA00 Zoning Analysis Existing Density Lot 38 - 2 Units (1 duplex) Lot 39 - 4 Units (1 fourplex or 2 duplexes) Total - 6 Units Setbacks Along Wildridge Rd E - 25' Rear (N property line) - 10' Side (Adjacent to Lot 37) - Side (Internal) - 7.5' Proposed Lot 38A - 1 Unit Lot 38B - 1 Unit Lot 38C - 1 Unit Lot 38D - 1 Unit Lot 38E - 1 Unit Lot 38F - 1 Unit Total - 6 Units Along Wildridge Rd E - 25' Rear (N property Line) - 10' 7.5' Side (Adjacent to Lot 37) - 7.5' Side (Internal) - 7.5' Along proposed internal Road - 25' Height 35' 35' Ear �E Q�� a r�L7 Gj - - TI- -- ^' all *2 wia.�a, ruo �,..,,.......p�.. ween..,, ��, a�e�m�e� Conceptual Lot Split Plan __ A 0.1 PUD Review Criteria L The PUD addresses a unique situation, confers a substantial benefit to the town, and/or incorporates creative site design such that it achieves the purposes of this Development Code and represents an improvement in quality over what could have been accomplished through strict application of the otherwise applicable district or development standards. Such improvements in quality may include, but are not limited to: improvements in open space provision and access; environmental protection; tree/ vegetation preservation; efficient provision of streets, roads, and other utilities and services; or increased choice of living and housing environments. The stated purposes of the Town of Avon Development Code and PUD criteria, refer to implementation of the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan which regulates intensity of use, demands on access and utilities, creating and preserving open space, and providing for compatibility with the surrounding areas and development. The proposed PUD amendment meets the intent of these criteria in the following ways: 1) does not increase the allowable density for the properties so there is not increased demands to public services, access, and utilities. 2) consolidates the properties to a single new roadway access onto Wildridge Road East limiting the points of access along the public road which offers improved safety, maintains snow storage areas along Wildridge Road East, and minimizes curb cuts and maintenance within the public right of way. 3) Creates deeded open space areas to preserve the natural environment and limit development to a suitable size, location, and density given the challenges with the topography of the subject property. 4) Creates a solution that is compatible with the surrounding environment and development with a greater opportunity for decreased building mass, increased open space, preservation of light and views, and integration of the structures into the site. ii. The PUD rezoning will promote the public heath, safety, and general welfare. The proposed PUD amendment does not adversely affect the public health, safety, and welfare, and as stated in the points above improves it in several facets. iii. The PUD rezoning is consistent with the Avon Comprehensive Plan, the purposes of this Development Code, and the eligibility criteria outlined in section 7.16.060(b). The proposed PUD amendment is part of the already established Wildridge PUD and is therefore not subject to the eligibility criteria or public benefit requirements. Under the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan, this property is included within District 24, Wildridge Residential District. This district includes the following planning principal: "Site buildings of varying sizes along the street to maximize sun exposure, protect views, be compatible with existing surrounding development, and break up building bulk." By splitting the density from larger structures such as duplexes and fourplexes into single family structures, the building bulk is broken up into half and one quarter of what could be built under the current governing development standards. Smaller structures promotes increased opportunity for views, sun exposure, and consistent open space and landscaping between structures. Subsequently, this PUD proposal contemplates a variety of single family residence sizes all compatible with the surrounding properties. iv. Facilities and services (including roads and transportation, water, gas, electric, police and fire protection, and sewage and waste disposal, as applicable) will be available to serve the subject property which maintaining adequate levels of service to existing developments. Since this PUD amendment proposes the same total density as is currently permitted on the lot, the existing services in place area adequate to serve this proposal without impacting any existing service. V. Compared to the underlying zoning, the PUD rezoning is not likely to result in significant adverse impacts upon the natural environment, including air, water, noise, storm water management, wildlife, and vegetation, or such impacts will be substantially mitigated. This proposed PUD amendment improves the natural environment by decreasing building bulk and creating integrated open space between structures. This also improves storm water management by creating increased opportunities for water to migrate across the site between smaller structures versus needing to be directed around larger structures constructed under the current approved development standards. A Compared to the underlying zoning, the PUD rezoning is not likely to result in significant adverse impacts upon other property in the vicinity of the subject tract, and This proposed PUD amendment does not create any adverse impacts on other properties as it maintains the existing density, easements and setbacks adjacent to current existing properties, and replaces internal setbacks and easements equal to the current existing development standards and in greater number providing more open space and functionality for surface and underground impacts. vii. future uses on the subject tract will be compatible in scale with uses or potential future uses on other properties in the vicinity of the subject tract. This proposed single family residential use is compatible with the scale and current uses of the surrounding properties as demonstrated on the attached Vicinity Map, and in most cases proposes smaller structures than exist on the immediately surrounding properties. L �a Avon, L „L' PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REPORT To: Town of Avon Planning and Zoning Commission From: Justin Hildreth, Town Engineer Date: January 14, 2015 Agenda Topic: Project Update for Case #MJ R14005, H.A. Nottingham Park Pavilion Summary: The Planning and Zoning Commission (PZC) approved a Major Development Plan for the H.A. Noottingham Park Pavilion on July 15th, 2014. Construction commenced in August and is expected to be completed by January 28th with the exception of several elements that are temperature dependent like landscaping and exterior painting. These elements will be completed in early summer of 2015. This memo is to update the PZC on the design changes that have occurred since the July meeting. Discussion: Town Council requested a project design team be created to assist in the decision making process regarding design and attempt to reduce project costs. The project design team included Jake Wolf, Dave Dantes, Virginia Egger, and Chris Evans (Contractor). The following are major design changes approved by the project design team: 1. Reduction of the pumphouse and green room roof height by 5 -Feet 2. Pumphouse exterior and green room exterior changed from basalt stone panels to black stucco ($176,556 savings) 3. Removal of faux window on east side of pumphouse ($1,982 savings) 4. Change from stone to concrete pavers that match the Main Street Mall Pavers on viewing terrace and plaza ($137,756 savings) 5. Remove row of 3 -FT tall boulders in front of stage ($5,861 savings) 6. Relocated boat ramp from north of stage to south of stage to improve access (no savings) 7. Reduction in landscape materials and Parks Staff will self-perforn the landscaping installation ($35,763 savings) 8. Revised stone veneer from modular buff sandstone to brownstone ($95,500 savings) 9. Revised lighting package to more affordable fixtures that are still compatible with the DMX control system. ($65,384 savings) There are two additional revisions the Project Team is considering: removal of the sound baffle system. The sound baffle system is designed to improve sound projection for non - amplified sound events and costs $200,00o as proposed. The venue will be tested with musicians, assessed and the Project Team will make a desicion regarding the sound baffles. The second revisions contemplated is the deletion of the steel facia plate goes around the canopy beams hiding the steel beams, providing a cleaner appearance and costs $123,512. The Project Team will determine the need for the steal facia after the construction is completed by evaluating the canopy aesthetics with the remaining project funds. Spikes to prevent birds from nesting on the canopy will be installed if the steel facia plate is deleted. Attachments: Take Photos onWednesday Avon, L „L' PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REPORT To: Town of Avon Planning and Zoning Commission From: Justin Hildreth, Town Engineer Date: January 14, 2015 Agenda Topic: Project Update 2015 World Cup Element in Roundabout 4 SUMMARY The Planning and Zoning Commission (PZC) approved a Minor Design and Development Plan for the 2015 Alpine World Ski Championships (AWSC) element in roundabout 4 as part of the Avon Road Streetscape Improvement Project on August 22nd 2014 and amended on October 21, 2014. The 2015 AWSC element is intended to pull design elements form the Beaver Creek and Vail race venues. The piece is intended to remain in place for 2 -years while the Town explores a more permanent "monumental" art piece for this critical Town Center roundabout. Staff is recommending several changes to the 2015 AWSC from what was approved by PZC including adding the word "Avon" above Town Center on each of the columns and removing the Lasso sculpture. The word Avon will be in the same color as Town Center and be aligned vertically between the metal bands that support the large banner. There have been concerns expressed that the Lasso sculpture is two large for the element, is partially blocked from view, and makes the 2015 WASC element too busy. The Lasso sculpture will be returned to its original location, north of the White River building on Benchmark Road. REVIEW CRITERIA The PZC shall use the Development Plan and Design Review criteria as the basis for a decision. Staff has provided a response to each mandatory review criteria below: §7.16.o8o(f), Development Plan (1) Evidence of substantial compliance with the purpose of the Development Code as specified in §7.04.030, Purposes; (2) Evidence of substantial compliance with the §7.16.ogo, Design Review. (3) Consistency with the Avon Comprehensive Plan; (4) Consistency with any previously approved and not revoked subdivision plat, planned development, or any other precedent plan or land use approval for the property as applicable; (5) Compliance with all applicable development and design standards set forth in this Code, including but not limited to the provisions in Chapter 7.20, Zone Districts and Official Zoning Map, Chapter 7.24, Use Regulations, and Chapter 7.28, Development Standards; and (6) That the development can be adequately served by city services including but not limited to roads, water, wastewater, fire protection, and emergency medical services. §7.16.ogo(f), Design Review (1) The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community; or, where redevelopment is anticipated, relates the development to the character of Avon as a whole; (z) The design meets the development and design standards established in this Development Code; and (3) The design reflects the long range goals and design criteria from the Avon Comprehensive Plan and other applicable, adopted plan documents. RECOMMENDATION If PZC wishes to approve these updated design plans, the recommended motion is: "I move to approve the Minor Design & Development Plan for Lasso and Town Center lettering at Roundabout #4, Avon Road Right -of -Way, citing conformance with the review criteria contained in §7.16.o8o(f) and §7.16.ogo(f), AMC." PHOTO is 2015 WASC Element in Roundabout 4 looking towards the southeast. PHOTO z: 2015 AWSC Element in Roundabout 4 looking to the north east. Avon COLORADO I. Call to Order— 5:0013m II. Roll Call All commissioners were present. III. Additions & Amendments to the Agenda • None IV. Conflicts of Interest Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes for Tuesday, January 6, 2015 Avon Municipal Building — One Lake Street • Chairman Clancy disclosed a conflict with the application in item V. and recused himself for that item. The PZC appointed Commissioner Minervini to chair item V. in Chairman Clancy's absence. V. PUBLIC HEARING: Case #TMP'4002 Property Location: Lot i Eagle River at Avon Subdivision Property Address: 38359 Highway 6 & 24 Zoning: PUD Applicant: Bill Simmons, Beaver Creek Resort Owner: Beaver Creek Resort Description: Temporary Use Permit for employee parking on vacant lot for ski season Notice: Vaily Daily 12/26; Action: Commissioner Struve moved to approve the application with the Temporary Use Permit termination date coinciding with the last day of Beaver Creek Resort ski season, with findings as prepared in the TMP14002 staff report. Commissioner Baum seconded the motion and the motion passed unanimously. VI. PUBLIC HEARING: Case #PUD14006 Minor PUD Amendment Property Location: Lot lo, Block 3 Wildridge Subdivision Property Address: 4010 Wildridge Road West Zoning: PUD Applicant: Mauriello Planning Group Owner: Andrei & Moica Gasperlin Description: PUD amendment to allow the lot to be split for development of two single -family - detached units. Action: Commissioner Minervini moved to approve the application with findings as prepared in the PUD14006 staff report. Commissioner Struve seconded the motion and the motion passed unanimously. VII. PUBLIC HEARING: Case #PUD14005 Minor PUD Amendment Property Location: Lot 44, Block 4, Wildridge Property Address: 5123 Longsun Lane Zoning: PUD Applicant: Bruce Baca, 5123 Longsun Lane January 6, 2015 PZC Meeting Minutes Owner: Bruce Baca, 5123 Longsun Lane Description: PUD amendment to allow the lot to be split for development of two single -family - detached units Action: Commissioner Bonidy moved to approve the application with conditions: 1. The residential footprint be limited to 4,00o square feet and the total livable area limited to 6,500 square feet z. The applicant shall propose limited site coverage and limited buildable area upon presentation to Town Council. Commissioner Hardy seconded the motion. At vote, two were in favor and four opposed. Motion failed. Commissioner Struve moved to table the application, seconded by Commissioner Minervini. At vote, four in favor with Commissioners Hardy and Bonidy opposing. The motion passed. VIII. Meeting Minutes Approval • Meeting Minutes from December 16, 2014 Action: The minutes were approved unanimously. IX. Other Business • Vacant PZC seat advertised 1.2.2015 for 2.5 weeks; council interview candidates 1.27.2015 • One more minor PU D amendments coming to PZC [7a 1.20.2015 meeting X. The meeting was adjourned at 6:3513m Approved this Day of , 2015 SIGNED: Jim Clancy, Chairman 2 1 January 6, 2015 PZC Meeting Minutes